Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

About Me

Latest News

Hackers Trick Users with Fake Captchas to Steal Data

  Cybersecurity researchers have uncovered a new technique where attackers use fake Captcha tests to trick people into installing malware ca...

All the recent news you need to know

Texas Attorney General Probes Meta AI Studio and Character.AI Over Child Data and Health Claims

 

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has opened an investigation into Meta AI Studio and Character.AI over concerns that their AI chatbots may present themselves as health or therapeutic tools while potentially misusing data collected from underage users. Paxton argued that some chatbots on these platforms misrepresent their expertise by suggesting they are licensed professionals, which could leave minors vulnerable to misleading or harmful information. 

The issue extends beyond false claims of qualifications. AI models often learn from user prompts, raising concerns that children’s data may be stored and used for training purposes without adequate safeguards. Texas law places particular restrictions on the collection and use of minors’ data under the SCOPE Act, which requires companies to limit how information from children is processed and to provide parents with greater control over privacy settings. 

As part of the inquiry, Paxton issued Civil Investigative Demands (CIDs) to Meta and Character.AI to determine whether either company is in violation of consumer protection laws in the state. While neither company explicitly promotes its AI tools as substitutes for licensed mental health services, there are multiple examples of “Therapist” or “Psychologist” chatbots available on Character.AI. Reports have also shown that some of these bots claim to hold professional licenses, despite being fictional. 

In response to the investigation, Character.AI emphasized that its products are intended solely for entertainment and are not designed to provide medical or therapeutic advice. The company said it places disclaimers throughout its platform to remind users that AI characters are fictional and should not be treated as real individuals. Similarly, Meta stated that its AI assistants are clearly labeled and include disclaimers highlighting that responses are generated by machines, not people. 

The company also said its AI tools are designed to encourage users to seek qualified medical or safety professionals when appropriate. Despite these disclaimers, critics argue that such warnings are easy to overlook and may not effectively prevent misuse. Questions also remain about how the companies collect, store, and use user data. 

According to their privacy policies, Meta gathers prompts and feedback to enhance AI performance, while Character.AI collects identifiers and demographic details that may be applied to advertising and other purposes. Whether these practices comply with Texas’ SCOPE Act will likely depend on how easily children can create accounts and how much parental oversight is built into the platforms. 

The investigation highlights broader concerns about the role of AI in sensitive areas such as mental health and child privacy. The outcome could shape how companies must handle data from younger users while limiting the risks of AI systems making misleading claims that could harm vulnerable individuals.

Workday Suffers Data Breach in Broader Salesforce Campaign

 

Workday, a major player in the human resources sector, has disclosed a recent data breach caused by a social engineering attack targeting a third-party customer relationship management (CRM) system—specifically, a Salesforce instance.

Although Workday, headquartered in Pleasanton, California, provides services to over 11,000 organizations worldwide (including over 60% of the Fortune 500), the company reports that its main customer data environments known as "customer tenants" were not accessed or impacted by the breach. 

The breach, uncovered nearly two weeks before disclosure, exposed business contact information such as names, emails, and phone numbers contained in the compromised CRM. 

Workday clarified that the compromised data was mostly publicly available information frequently used for business contact purposes, but acknowledged that this exposure could still facilitate further social engineering or phishing attempts by malicious parties. Employees were alerted that attackers may attempt to contact them, impersonating HR or IT staff, to extract sensitive details or credentials. 

This incident is part of a larger ongoing campaign allegedly orchestrated by the ShinyHunters extortion group. BleepingComputer reports that this group specializes in targeting Salesforce CRM instances at major firms through tactics like voice phishing and social engineering. 

Their modus operandi often involves convincing employees to link a fraudulent OAuth application to the company's Salesforce environment, granting attackers access to download vital company databases. Subsequently, stolen data is used for extortion, and the attack group’s ransom notes have consistently identified themselves as ShinyHunters. 

Several other global corporations—including Adidas, Qantas, Allianz Life, Louis Vuitton, Dior, Tiffany & Co., Chanel, and Google—have fallen victim to similar attacks over the past few months, with activity believed to have started at the beginning of the year. 

Although Workday didn't confirm direct involvement with Salesforce in their public statement, a company spokesperson indicated the breach was associated with business contact data in the Salesforce platform. The attackers primarily leveraged social engineering, not technical vulnerabilities, to obtain unauthorized access. This breach highlights the increasing effectiveness of well-crafted social engineering attacks targeting SaaS platforms and the persistent threat posed by organized groups such as ShinyHunters. While the compromise did not reach more sensitive internal systems, Workday and similar organizations face ongoing risks of secondary attacks fueled by the exposed contact data.

PayPal Password Leak Puts Millions of Users on High Alert

 


It has been reported that millions of PayPal accounts have been traded on underground forums, which has raised a new wave of alarm in the ever-evolving landscape of cybercrime. Using the moniker “Chucky_BF”, a hacker announcing the availability of a dataset of 15.8 million PayPal accounts for the startlingly low price of $750 USD has advertised what he claims is a dataset of 15.8 million PayPal accounts. 

There has been widespread discussion across social media about the trove, which allegedly contains a 1.1 gigabyte text file that stores plaintext email and password combinations, making them accessible and ready for immediate use for malicious purposes. According to the hacker, the records he created cover a wide range of email providers, such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, among others, suggesting that the victims are spread around the globe. 

A concern, however, may be the inclusion of PayPal-specific login URLs and mobile URLs, which appear to be structured in such a way as to facilitate an automated exploit. The stolen credentials are organized along with direct links to PayPal sign-in portals that you can use to sign into PayPal—for example, the /signin, /signup, /connect, and the Android application URIs—in a way that makes them easy for cybercriminals to deploy as a toolkit. 

According to screenshots of the offer being circulated on the internet, there are rows of raw email:password:url entries, an information dump format commonly used in underground credential dumps. Even though the authenticity of the data has not been confirmed, due to its structured nature and low asking price, concerns have been raised that the data could rapidly be acquired by cybercriminals eager to exploit any portion of the data.

Those who would want to be attackers could use a dataset like this as the foundation for credential stuffing attacks, phishing campaigns, or even large-scale fraud against PayPal users across multiple countries if they wanted to make such a purchase. 

Not just because of the numbers, but because PayPal is a trusted platform for millions of businesses and individuals throughout the world, the hacker’s bold claims have caught the attention of the world. The central player in the global ecosystem of digital payments, even unverified reports of a massive leak raise immediate questions regarding the potential financial loss, the reputational damage, and the security of user identities in an environment that is becoming increasingly hostile. 

It is important to note, however, that while the alleged dataset has sparked headlines, experts emphasise that a thorough analysis of the situation is necessary. Neither PayPal nor any of its subsidiaries have ever been directly breached by large-scale attackers who have taken millions of user records from the company's systems. This distinction is crucial because previous incidents related to PayPal—such as one involving around 35,000 users—were attributed to credential stuffing or the use of previously stolen data, not to flaws within PayPal's own infrastructure. 

If the claims made by "Chucky_BF" are accurate, it appears as though the dataset has more likely come from an infostealer malware infection than from PayPal's servers themselves. A malicious program, known as an infostealer malware infection, infects computers and mobile devices and can often be delivered through phishing emails, malicious downloads, or compromised websites in order to gain access to personal data. 

It has been shown that the malware is silently extracting stored login information, browser history, cookies, and autofill information from a system once inside, then sending this information to cybercriminals. This theory is supported by the fact that the hacker shared samples that included PayPal login URLs and Android URIs. In contrast to the centralised dump that PayPal's systems may have produced, this dataset may have gathered stolen logs from compromised personal devices all over the world, carefully restructured to appear as if they were stolen from PayPal. 

The practice of rebranding or repackaging stolen data is common within cybercrime markets, where rebranding can enhance a person's perception of how valuable it is. Recent discoveries strengthen this belief. Researchers identified 184 million login credentials, including unique usernames and passwords, that had been exposed through a misconfigured cloud server in May of 2025, according to cybersecurity researcher Jeremiah Fowler. 

In the same way that PayPal credentials are believed to have been retrieved via infostealer malware rather than through a direct company breach, those credentials are almost certainly the result of infostealer malware. Information-stealing malware is extremely destructive. In Hudson Rock's research, it has been determined that such malware is not only readily available on the dark web but has been successfully infiltrating not just individual users, but also critical institutions, according to Hudson Rock's research. 

It was found that employees of some of the most sensitive organisations in the United States had been infected by the virus, including the Pentagon, Lockheed Martin, Honeywell, branches of the military, and even the FBI, according to the analysis. Taking advantage of infostealers highlights that even institutions that have robust security frameworks can be compromised, which underscores how vulnerable consumers may be to similar threats that they are not aware of or are unable to protect themselves from. 

PayPal users face immediate and multifaceted risks if the data is fabricated or recycled, millions of real credentials are still in circulation despite the fact that some of the data may be fabricated or recycled. The information that cybercriminals possess can be used to launch credential stuffing attacks in which stolen email-password pairs are tested across multiple platforms in search of accounts whose credentials are reusable. Because most individuals recycle the same login information across a wide range of financial, e-commerce, and social platforms, a compromise of a single PayPal account can lead to an overall e-commerce invasion. 

Besides direct financial theft, there are also other risks associated with structured datasets such as this, including phishing campaigns that can be created to mimic PayPal login pages and lure victims into providing updated credentials. This data can also be used for social engineering purposes by attracting individuals to tailored scams that exploit their trust in financial institutions. Depending on the extent of the data, there could be a loss of revenue, fraud, and recovery costs of billions of dollars, depending on whether it was authentic. 

As of the time of writing, PayPal has not confirmed or denied the authenticity of the dataset. HackRead.com, which reported the sale, was also unable to independently confirm the claims. I have contacted the company to get their opinion, but I anticipate that any confirmation or rebuttal of the statement would affect the level of response its global user base will require. However, vigilance has not been abandoned by cybersecurity experts in cases where unverified leaks make headlines. 

In cases where unverified leaks make headlines, it would be prudent for users to assume the worst and take proactive measures to protect themselves. Analysts recommend that all PayPal users immediately: Reset their PayPal password to a strong, unique one. Enable Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), ideally through an authenticator app instead of SMS. 

Check linked email accounts for unusual login activity. Use password managers to avoid reusing credentials across multiple platforms. Run updated antivirus and anti-malware scans on devices to detect possible infections. Monitor financial transactions closely, enabling alerts for any suspicious payments. Consider identity theft protection services, particularly for users who conduct significant business via PayPal. 

Experts also stress the importance of an overall digital hygiene program. As infostealer malware has emerged as one of the most potent and pervasive forms of cybersecurity, experts advise updating software regularly, being cautious when browsing, and being sceptical when receiving unsolicited emails or downloading files. 

A significant risk reduction can be achieved for businesses, especially those relying heavily on PayPal for e-commerce, by implementing endpoint protection solutions and employee training programs. The alleged theft of PayPal credentials serves as a stark reminder of the fragile balance between trust and e-commerce in general. 

In spite of the fact that PayPal may not have suffered any direct breaches, the reputational fallout of its brand and its users still lingers, especially when the company's brand is compromised. With the rise of cybercrime marketplaces, stolen or recycled data will likely continue to be retrieved, repackaged, and sold to eager customers for the foreseeable future. 

The only way to stay ahead of attackers is to practice proactive security, so the only way to protect yourself is to stay ahead of them. As a result, whether the 15.8 million credentials that were advertised by “Chucky_BF” represented a real new breach, a compilation of stolen logs, or simply a rebranded dump of older leaks, the underlying issue remains the same: in today's digital economy, personal data is a commodity and vigilance is not optional - it is the price of taking part. 

The lesson from this episode is clear: your password should not be changed after confirmation, but now rather than later. Considering the ever-expanding digital landscape, incidents such as the alleged sale of PayPal credentials underscore a more important truth that security is no longer just an optional layer of protection, but a fundamental responsibility of everyone involved in the online economy today. In addition to immediate countermeasures like password resets or multifactor authentication, users must adopt a mindset of continuous cyber-resilience in addition to these immediate countermeasures. 

Digital accounts should be treated in the same way as physical assets in order to prevent them from being compromised. It is essential to pay close attention to the evolving nature of threats and take the time to utilise tools that go beyond basic security hygiene to detect compromised credentials early, such as hardware security keys, zero-trust authentication models, and regular dark web monitoring. 

There is no doubt that in an environment where a brand's reputation is fragile, cybersecurity awareness is integral to a business's daily operations, especially for small businesses that rely heavily on platforms like PayPal. By embedding cybersecurity awareness into everyday operations, businesses are not only protecting revenues but also strengthening customer trust. 

A proactive approach to layered defences can ultimately be a source of peace of mind for the individual, who is confident that he or she will not be perpetually vulnerable to unseen adversaries while transacting, communicating, and operating online. Cybersecurity may seem complicated at first glance, but it is the discipline of foresight, vigilance, and accountability that ensures digital trust remains strong in the long run.

Fake Telegram Premium Website Spreads Lumma Stealer Malware

 

Cybersecurity researchers have uncovered a malicious campaign that uses a fraudulent Telegram Premium website to distribute a dangerous variant of the Lumma Stealer malware. According to a report by Cyfirma, the fake domain telegrampremium[.]app closely imitates the official Telegram Premium branding and hosts a file named start.exe.

The executable, developed in C/C++, is automatically downloaded when a user visits the site—no clicks required. Once executed, it collects sensitive data, including stored browser credentials, cryptocurrency wallet information, and system details, significantly raising the risk of identity theft. The site acts as a drive-by download, meaning malware is delivered without user consent.

Researchers noted the executable’s high entropy, indicating the use of a cryptor to conceal its operations and evade traditional security detection. Static analysis revealed that the malware imports numerous Windows API functions, giving it the ability to alter files, edit registry entries, access the clipboard, launch further payloads, and bypass defenses.

The Lumma Stealer variant also makes DNS queries through Google’s public DNS, sidestepping corporate network restrictions. It communicates with legitimate platforms like Telegram and Steam Community for possible command-and-control (C2) operations, while also relying on algorithmically generated domains to avoid domain takedowns.

The attackers rely on newly registered infrastructure, pointing to short-lived but highly targeted operations. The malware also drops disguised files in the %TEMP% directory, including encrypted payloads hidden as image files. These are later renamed and executed as obfuscated scripts, which help the malware erase its tracks.

Advanced evasion techniques include the use of commands like Sleep to delay execution and LoadLibraryExW to discreetly load DLLs, making early detection more difficult for security analysts.

How to Stay Safe
  • Deploy endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools that can spot behaviors linked to Lumma Stealer
  • Block known malicious domains
  • Enforce strict download restrictions to prevent drive-by attacks
  • Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) to minimize damage from stolen credentials
  • Rotate credentials regularly to limit attackers’ long-term access
  • Continuously monitor for unusual activity to ensure swift response

FBI Warns of Rising Online Threats Targeting Youth and Digital Assets





The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has raised concern over what it describes as a fast-expanding online threat, warning that criminal groups are becoming more organized and dangerous in cyberspace. The activity includes ransomware, phishing scams, cryptocurrency theft, and even violent real-world crimes linked to online networks.

According to the FBI, one of the most concerning groups involved in these activities is part of an online collective often referred to as “The Com,” short for “The Community.” This loosely connected network is made up of several subgroups, including one known as “Hacker Com.” The collective primarily communicates in English and has members spread across different countries.

A striking detail is that many individuals taking part are very young, with ages ranging from early teens to their mid-20s. Recruitment often happens on online gaming platforms, social media channels, or through existing members who look for people with shared interests.

The FBI notes that the scale and sophistication of these groups has increased substantially over the past four years. Members use advanced tools such as phishing kits, voice changers, and other techniques to disguise their identities and hide illegal financial dealings. These methods make it difficult for law enforcement to trace stolen funds or identify those responsible.

Much of the activity is financially motivated, especially through schemes involving cryptocurrency. Offenses include SIM swapping, hacking into networks, and in some cases, direct physical threats. The FBI has reported that criminal actors have resorted to extreme methods such as coercion, intimidation, and even violence to force victims into giving up access to digital accounts.

Beyond theft, some members also carry out dangerous acts such as swatting: making false emergency reports that lead armed law enforcement to a target’s home or issuing bomb threats. These tactics are sometimes used to distract authorities during larger cyberattacks or thefts. Disturbingly, certain groups have extended their activities into the offline world, where crimes can escalate into real-world violence.

Given the scope of the threat, the FBI is advising the public to be cautious when sharing personal details online. Posting photos, videos, or sensitive information on social media, dating platforms, or gaming forums can make individuals and families targets. Parents are especially encouraged to stay alert to their children’s online activity and to have open conversations about the potential risks.

For those who believe they may have been targeted or victimized, the FBI recommends keeping all available evidence, such as messages or transaction details, and reporting incidents promptly through its Internet Crime Complaint Center (ic3.gov) or by contacting a local FBI field office.

The Bureau emphasizes that awareness and vigilance are key defenses against these developing online dangers.


Federal Judge Allows Amazon Alexa Users’ Privacy Lawsuit to Proceed Nationwide

 

A federal judge in Seattle has ruled that Amazon must face a nationwide lawsuit involving tens of millions of Alexa users. The case alleges that the company improperly recorded and stored private conversations without user consent. U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik determined that Alexa owners met the legal requirements to pursue collective legal action for damages and an injunction to halt the alleged practices. 

The lawsuit claims Amazon violated Washington state law by failing to disclose that it retained and potentially used voice recordings for commercial purposes. Plaintiffs argue that Alexa was intentionally designed to secretly capture billions of private conversations, not just the voice commands directed at the device. According to their claim, these recordings may have been stored and repurposed without permission, raising serious privacy concerns. Amazon strongly disputes the allegations. 

The company insists that Alexa includes multiple safeguards to prevent accidental activation and denies evidence exists showing it recorded conversations belonging to any of the plaintiffs. Despite Amazon’s defense, Judge Lasnik stated that millions of users may have been impacted in a similar manner, allowing the case to move forward. Plaintiffs are also seeking an order requiring Amazon to delete any recordings and related data it may still hold. The broader issue at stake in this case centers on privacy rights within the home.

If proven, the claims suggest that sensitive conversations could have been intercepted and stored without explicit approval from users. Privacy experts caution that voice data, if mishandled or exposed, can lead to identity risks, unauthorized information sharing, and long-term security threats. Critics further argue that the lawsuit highlights the growing power imbalance between consumers and large technology companies. Amazon has previously faced scrutiny over its corporate practices, including its environmental footprint. 

A 2023 report revealed that the company’s expanding data centers in Virginia would consume more energy than the entire city of Seattle, fueling additional criticism about the company’s long-term sustainability and accountability. The case against Amazon underscores the increasing tension between technological convenience and personal privacy. 

As voice-activated assistants become commonplace in homes, courts will likely play a decisive role in determining the boundaries of data collection and consumer protection. The outcome of this lawsuit could set a precedent for how tech companies handle user data and whether customers can trust that private conversations remain private.

Pakistani Cybercriminals Turn Piracy Against Pirates in $4M Malware Scheme

 

A massive cybercrime operation based in Pakistan has been exposed after running a sophisticated infostealer malware campaign for five years, generating over $4 million by targeting software pirates. 

Operation details

The criminal network, primarily operating from Bahawalpur and Faisalabad, functioned like a multi-level marketing scheme but distributed malicious code instead of legitimate products. According to research, the group used search engine optimisation poisoning and forum posts to advertise pirated software such as Adobe After Effects and Internet Download Manager. 

Victims were redirected to malicious WordPress sites where infostealer malware, including Lumma Stealer, Meta Stealer, and AMOS was hidden within password-protected archives. The operation utilised disposable domains to mask the true source of infections, making detection more difficult. 

Financial infrastructure

The scheme's backbone consisted of two Pay-Per-Install (PPI) networks: InstallBank and SpaxMedia (later rebranded as Installstera). Over 5,200 affiliates operated at least 3,500 sites, earning payments for each successful malware installation or download. Payments were processed primarily through Payoneer and Bitcoin. 

The scale was enormous, with records showing 449 million clicks and more than 1.88 million installations during the documented period. Long-running domains proved most profitable, with a small fraction generating the majority of revenue. 

Downfall and exposure

The operation was accidentally exposed when the attackers themselves became infected by infostealer malware, revealing credentials, communications, and backend access to their own systems. This breach uncovered evidence of family involvement, with recurring surnames and shared accounts throughout the infrastructure. The group evolved their tactics over time, shifting from install-based tracking in 2020 to download-focused metrics in later years, possibly to evade detection or adapt monetisation methods. 

How to stay safe 

  • Avoid cracked or pirated software; rely on official developer sites and reputable distributors to prevent infostealer exposure at the source. 
  • Keep security suites updated and configure firewalls to block outbound C2 communication, reducing post-compromise impact if malware executes. 
  • Enable multi-factor authentication so stolen credentials are insufficient for account takeovers, and monitor accounts for identity-theft signals.
  • Maintain offline or secure cloud backups for recovery, stay alert to suspicious domain activity, and distrust “free” offers for expensive software that often hide hidden risks.