Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Latest News

How We Got AD Admin In Red Teaming With GLM5.3 and RedactProxy

A client engaged us to red team their internal network. It was fully black box: zero input, no starting credentials, and no guidance on wher...

All the recent news you need to know

BigCommerce Merchants Hit in Supply Chain Breach After Ribon App Credentials Were Stolen

 



BigCommerce has started alerting merchants that customer data was stolen from their stores after attackers got hold of API credentials belonging to Ribon, a third-party storefront optimization app used by retailers across the platform.

The stolen credentials gave attackers access to customer records inside merchant accounts on BigCommerce between September 13 and September 17. For those four days, they pulled data page by page until the compromised key was revoked. Names, email addresses, phone numbers, and shipping addresses were taken. Passwords and payment card details were not, because BigCommerce stores that information in a separate system.

The breach did not originate inside BigCommerce. It traced back to a system compromise at Fastr, the parent company of Be A Part Of, the firm that develops and operates Ribon and its updated version, Ribon 1.5. Fastr's internal compromise exposed the API credentials those apps held, and attackers used them to walk directly into merchant environments without triggering any alarm at BigCommerce's own infrastructure level.

"On September 17, 2026, Commerce confirmed that API credentials belonging to third-party applications Ribon and Ribon 1.5, owned and operated by 'Be A Part Of,' a Fastr company, had been compromised due to a Fastr system compromise," BigCommerce told SecurityWeek. "This was not a breach of Commerce systems or the BigCommerce platform."

Ribon's own developers noticed the key was being misused on September 16. The access was cut on September 17, and BigCommerce uninstalled the app from all affected stores the same day. Merchants started receiving notifications from BigCommerce on September 18. In some stores, attackers also injected malicious scripts, though BigCommerce has only said this affected a small number of storefronts and has not specified what those scripts were designed to execute.

UK spirits retailer Master of Malt confirmed publicly it was among the merchants notified. In a statement on its website, the company said the attacker accessed its customer database and described what happened in plain terms. "It looks like hackers were able to compromise a BigCommerce Application key held by Ribon, which they were able to use to gain access to customer data held on their system." Master of Malt has reported the incident to the UK Information Commissioner's Office and said the impact may extend to hundreds of other retailers that had Ribon installed on their stores.

That point matters. This was not a breach contained to one retailer or to one retailer's mistakes. Every merchant that had Ribon connected to its BigCommerce store shared the same exposure risk, because every one of them relied on the same third-party credentials that Fastr failed to protect. The total number of affected merchants has not been disclosed. Fastr and Be A Part Of have not issued any public statement. Neither company had responded to media requests for comment as of the time of reporting.

BigCommerce hosts over 1,200 third-party apps and integrations. It told BleepingComputer it is providing log data to support Fastr's investigation. Seattle-based law firm Emery Reddy is already seeking potential claimants, noting that several retailers have begun sending breach notifications to their customers. The firm confirmed the exposed information matches what Master of Malt reported: names, email addresses, phone numbers, and physical addresses.

This incident is not the first time BigCommerce has had to yank a third-party app after attackers used it to reach merchant customers. In late 2024, electronics accessories maker ZAGG disclosed that unknown actors had breached FreshClick, another third-party BigCommerce integration, and injected payment-skimming code into its checkout. That attack ran from October 26 through November 7, 2024, and resulted in the theft of names, addresses, and live payment card data from customers completing transactions on ZAGG's site.

The two incidents differ in method. The FreshClick attack used malicious JavaScript to capture card details at the point of entry, in real time, as customers typed. The Ribon attack used a compromised backend key to query stored customer records directly, without any customer interaction required. No payment data changed hands this time, but the attacker had persistent, authenticated access to customer databases for four consecutive days before anyone pulled the key.

For shoppers at any retailer that used Ribon, names, email addresses, phone numbers, and home addresses are now in someone else's hands. That combination is more than enough to build convincing phishing messages or to attempt account takeover on other services where those same details appear. Affected customers should treat any unsolicited emails referencing their account details or recent orders with skepticism until the full scope of the incident is established.


Arista Warns of Critical Actively Exploited VCO Vulnerability

 

Arista has published Security Advisory 0183 warning of a critical vulnerability in on-premises VeloCloud Orchestrator (VCO), tracked as CVE-2026-93952. The advisory, dated September 22, 2026, assigns the flaw a CVSS 3.1 base score of 10.0, indicating the highest level of severity. The issue is caused by improper input validation and is already being actively exploited, making immediate assessment and remediation essential for affected organisations. 

The vulnerability could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to access privileged internal functionality and compromise the VCO host. Successful exploitation may affect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the orchestrator, including data managed by it. Arista said the issue affects on-premises VCO deployments, while hosted and dedicated VCO versions have already been patched. The affected software includes VCO 5.2.3.15 and earlier in the 5.2.x series, 6.1.3.7 and earlier in the 6.1.x series, 6.4.2.7 and earlier in the 6.4.x series, and 7.0.0.2 and earlier in the 7.0.x series. 

An affected deployment requires certificate-based authentication between a VeloCloud Edge and VCO, access to the public portion of the Edge authentication certificate, and network access to the VCO web interface. Tenant or operator credentials are not required. Organisations that limit the VCO web interface to trusted administrative networks can reduce exposure, although this should be treated as a temporary defensive measure rather than a complete solution. Arista’s EOS-based networking products and several other listed Arista platforms are not affected by this vulnerability. 

Administrators should inspect VCO web-access, backend application and system logs for unusual requests, encoded URL components, references to internal services or unusually high request rates. Other warning signs include unexpected outbound traffic, unauthorized configuration changes, unexplained maintenance actions, command execution, file creation, database exports or access to credentials and certificates. Arista specifically identified suspicious files, the x-vc-opt HTTP header and connections from 142.93.149.77 and 104.248.126.159 as indicators requiring investigation. 

Arista recommends upgrading to a remediated VCO release as soon as possible. Fixes are available in VCO 5.2.3.16 and later within the 5.2.3 train, and VCO 6.4.2.8 and later within the 6.4.2 train; fixes for other release trains will be added. Until then, organisations should restrict web access, monitor inbound and outbound activity, review administrator actions and watch for backdoors or webshells. If compromise is suspected, operators should preserve relevant logs and file timestamps before remediation, contact Arista TAC, rotate credentials, validate managed Edge devices and consider rebuilding the orchestrator from trusted sources.

Meta Muse Flaw Lets Attackers Hijack AI Assistant


The Muse artificial intelligence assistant from Meta has been found to be vulnerable to an attack which allows malicious software to redirect its dictation traffic and control the actions performed by the application if it is locally running malware. 

The issue was demonstrated by security researcher Patrick Wardle in a proof-of-concept published on September 21, which demonstrates how an attacker with code execution rights under the user logged into Muse can exploit a hidden configuration in Muse. Wardle has also emphasized that the vulnerability does not provide an initial entry point into a Mac, but rather becomes dangerous after a malicious program or attacker has already been installed on the device. 

In addition, Wardle also warned that the attack may be delivered remotely via a ClickFix-style method, in which the victim is persuaded to execute a command without downloading or installing traditional malicious software. The Meta AI agent Muse was launched earlier this month as a personal AI agent capable of interacting with services and applications based on user permissions. Its capabilities include file sharing, email, messaging, calendars, shopping services, and smart-home applications. As a result of these permissions, the malicious process does not have to obtain the same access independently, making them particularly relevant to this attack. 

There is a problem with an undocumented Muse preference named endo_voyager_dictation_endpoint that controls the location where voice dictation is processed. The setting can be modified by an application running under the same user account. No additional macOS permission is necessary to modify the setting so that Meta's legitimate endpoint is replaced with an attacker's endpoint. 

A redirected endpoint can allow voice input intended for Muse to be sent to a service controlled by the attacker. Testing has demonstrated that both the audio and transcription can be intercepted. Once the input has been captured, the attacker can observe dictated prompts and influence Muse's instructions. 

A further significant benefit of the redirected traffic is that the token associated with the user's Muse account can be accessed and used to interact directly with Muse. Wardle demonstrated that the token can be accessed and used directly to access the account's chat history. Thus, malicious code is no longer simply stealing information, but rather abusing the AI assistant itself in order to carry out actions based on the privileges that have already been assigned. 

A secondary concern is how conventional endpoint security tools might interpret the activity. The Muse application is a legitimate, signed application, so actions initiated through it may appear to originate from a trusted process rather than directly from malware. Wardle's testing further revealed that access obtained through Muse tokens may extend beyond the compromised computer.

Using the token, the researcher was able to execute commands through Muse on another device since the same account can be used across multiple devices. In testing, the researcher was able to have the assistant on a smartphone report its location, scan for nearby Bluetooth devices, and identify smart home controls. 

Meta Releases Hotfix for Muse Zero-Day

The vulnerability has been addressed by Meta with a hotfix for Muse on MacOS. According to David Singleton of Meta Superintelligence Labs, the issue involves a local privilege escalation rather than a remote vulnerability. Moreover, exploitation requires malicious software to have already been installed under the user's account. 

By closing the configuration path that Wardle used in his proof-of-concept, the hotfix removes the ability to modify the dictation endpoint. As Meta stated, there was a limited practical risk associated with the attack since it requires the installation of local code. However, the requirement for local code execution does not necessarily exclude realistic attack scenarios. Wardle cited ClickFix-style attacks, in which victims are tricked into executing commands on their own computers.

By employing such a method, one might be able to gain a foothold without having to install conventional malware in order to exploit the Muse vulnerability. A broader concern with artificial intelligence agents that operate with extensive permissions has been highlighted by the vulnerability. As a result of Muse accessing a wide range of system resources and connected services, it may be possible for attackers to use those existing permissions once they have obtained control of the agent, rather than requiring separate access to each protected resource. 

In Wardle's testing, he demonstrated that the vulnerability can be exploited for a variety of purposes beyond the theft of dictated information. As part of the proof-of-concept activity, the user was able to take images and create documents on the Mac using Muse, in some cases without being made aware of. 

In addition, the research demonstrated that attackers controlling Muse sessions may interact with connected devices, although some actions are limited to the preparation of drafts during testing. This vulnerability does not imply the bypassing of macOS's underlying permission system directly, but rather the abuse of Muse once sensitive capabilities have been granted. As a result, the compromised process may be able to make requests through legitimate, signed applications, potentially making the results harder to distinguish from normal AI-aided operations. Moreover, the dictation system design of Muse contributed to the vulnerability as well. While Apple's dictation capabilities are available on device, Muse transmits voice inputs to Meta's infrastructure for processing. 

Wardle argued that this architecture created an endpoint that can be redirected by another local process. Several security and isolation controls have been implemented in the context of Muse, including its dedicated Secure VM architecture and additional safeguards designed to limit agent actions. However, the flaw revealed is not in the cloud environment designed to isolate user agents but in the macOS application itself. 

Personal artificial intelligence agents are increasingly being seen as sources of security concerns, particularly those that provide conversational capabilities as well as access to files, devices, accounts, and external services. In the event of an agent weakness, those permissions can be turned into an attack path. However, even if the underlying operating system enforces its normal security boundaries, the agent could potentially act as an attack vector.

Chinese Hackers Exploit ZyXEL Switch Flaw to Steal Data From Nearly 1,000 Devices

 

A Chinese threat actor has been using the recently discovered vulnerability in ZyXEL GS1900 switches to steal crucial information from the devices around the world, according to GreyNoise, a threat intelligence company.

The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-7273, has a CVSS score of 8.8 and is a stack-based buffer overflow, enabling a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute OS commands via a specially crafted HTTP request. 

ZyXEL has issued security updates for ten GS1900 switch models in June. However, according to GreyNoise, the flaw was actively exploited in August, targeting the devices in 48 countries. The threat actors used a Python script, which was significantly obfuscated to hide its purpose, to extract the hashes of the root credentials, configuration, and network information from 996 affected switches. 

While the script targeted the GS1900-24 switches with firmware versions 2.10 to 2.90, some of the command-line options in the script contained values related to libc base addresses and global offsets. Therefore, it might be possible that the threat actors could use the same vulnerability to target other firmware versions. The information stolen from the switches also showed that 564 devices were using default credentials. This lets the attackers effortlessly compromise these devices. 

On Monday, the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) added the vulnerability to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Also, per the Binding Operational Directive 26-04, all federal agencies must remediate this issue within 3 days of its publication. GreyNoise also reported that the same threat actor conducted Ubiquiti attacks, which involved exploiting the zero-day flaws to gain remote access and execute arbitrary code in the devices. 

In addition, the attackers used exploits targeting WordPress flaws to launch attacks against small businesses and government entities in July. The attacks entailed a threat actor compromising a Western government organization, stealing over 18000 sensitive documents from the agency’s backend database, and publishing the results on a Matrix communication service. 

However, the cybersecurity firm is yet to confirm if any of these attacks were conducted by the same threat actor. Acronis, another cybersecurity firm, previously identified threat actors using the Red Heron hacking group, which primarily used Gitea’s zero-day flaw to target more than 100 organizations worldwide.

Foreign Hackers Got Into Two Colorado Water Systems, Messed With Pump Controls and Killed the Alarms

 




Foreign actors broke into the industrial control systems of two small private water utilities in Colorado last month, altered pumping cycles, changed equipment settings, and shut off the alarms that would have told operators something was wrong. The state confirmed the incidents on Friday. It has not named the utilities or the attackers.

Both systems are privately owned and serve fewer than 200 people each. The intrusions happened in late August. According to the governor's office, the attackers disabled remote access, switched off alarms, and changed how water was being pumped before operators caught on and regained control. Water quality and treatment were not affected at either location.

"These were brief incidents and the risks were quickly addressed by the providers themselves, who subsequently alerted the state," said Ally Sullivan, a spokeswoman for Governor Jared Polis. "To our knowledge, treatment processes and water quality were not impacted at either provider."

Colorado officials did not name a suspect. Sullivan said the office "cannot confirm what foreign actors may have been involved," but pointed to a CISA-tracked Iranian-backed group that has been working to access drinking water and wastewater systems across the country. Federal authorities have made no formal attribution in the Colorado case.


Part of Something Bigger

Colorado is the latest state in a list that has now reached at least 12 reporting intrusions into water system controls this year. The EPA says more than 100 drinking water and wastewater systems have been hit in 2026, most accessed through programmable logic controllers, or PLCs, connected to the open internet via cellular modems, often without the utilities realizing it.

The summer's single worst episode came on July 26 and 27, when attackers hit more than 30 communities in Minnesota in what state IT officials called a coordinated assault. At least four cities publicly confirmed disruptions. One plant went offline entirely; others dropped to manual operation. In Georgia, hackers took down a pump station, cutting pressure enough that residents were advised to boil water before using it. No one reported getting sick.

The FBI and EPA issued a joint warning on July 30 describing attackers who remotely changed IP addresses and passwords on exposed controllers, locking operators out. In some cases, the intrusions created conditions where untreated groundwater could have entered distribution pipes.

CISA said it tracked attacks against more than 100 internet-exposed water sector systems in July alone, the majority accessed through PLCs attached directly to cellular modems.


The Group Investigators Are Watching

The most scrutinized suspect is CyberAv3ngers, a threat group formally tied to Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Cyber-Electronic Command. The U.S. Treasury sanctioned six of its senior officials in February 2024. The State Department has offered $10 million for information on the group's activities.

The group has run through four documented phases since 2020. It started by exploiting default passwords on Israeli-made water utility controllers, moved on to deploying custom malware called IOCONTROL against industrial and IoT devices, and this year shifted to actively exploiting an authentication bypass flaw in Rockwell Automation's widely used Logix PLCs. No vendor patch exists for that vulnerability.

Six federal agencies, CISA, the FBI, NSA, EPA, the Department of Energy, and U.S. Cyber Command, warned jointly on April 7 that Iranian-affiliated actors were actively hitting internet-facing PLCs across water, energy, government, and manufacturing sites.


Congress and Industry Push Back

Senators Adam Schiff and Amy Klobuchar introduced the Water Cyber Shield Act in August, which would give the EPA authority to audit utilities and mandate corrective action. The bill authorizes $300 million annually through existing water infrastructure funds.

At DEF CON, the National Rural Water Association launched the Water Watch Center, pairing five managed security firms with small utilities at no cost. The program targets systems serving under 10,000 people, which make up 91 percent of the country's roughly 50,000 community water systems.

Denver Water, which supplies about 1.5 million people across the metro area, told Axios it evaluated the threat after the Colorado disclosure and found its systems unaffected. Federal investigators are working with state officials to determine how the two utilities were accessed.

Cyberattack Hits University of Munich, Exposing Student Data

 

Germany’s Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU) is investigating a significant cyberattack that potentially exposed sensitive student information, including financial aid and health insurance data. The breach, detected on a Wednesday, led the university to disconnect affected servers and engage external cyber security experts while cooperating with law enforcement. 

The compromised records reportedly include students’ names, dates of birth, contact details, LMU email addresses, bank account information, and details about their courses of study and prior educational qualifications. In some cases, health insurance numbers and identifiers linked to Germany’s student financial aid program may also have been accessed, along with data related to leaves of absence. However, the university confirmed that examination records, specific course content, and individual academic performance data were not affected. 

Operational impact and response 

Following the discovery of the breach, LMU took several systems offline as a precaution, temporarily disrupting some internal services. While teaching activities continued uninterrupted, enrollment processes were briefly suspended and are expected to resume with extended deadlines to ensure students are not disadvantaged. Some students reported difficulties accessing university services needed for semester preparation, including course registration and grade viewing. The institution has not disclosed the number of affected individuals or the duration of unauthorized access, and no ransom demand has been publicly confirmed. 

Universities remain attractive targets for cybercriminals due to their extensive networks containing vast amounts of personal and financial information across large populations of students, researchers, and staff. Recent ransomware attacks have affected prominent U.S. institutions such as the University of Texas, University of Oklahoma, Stanford University, and the University of Michigan, with several incidents occurring after holiday breaks. Other notable cases include disruptions at the University of Pennsylvania, Columbia University, and Harvard University over the past years.

LMU has enlisted specialists to monitor dark-web forums and other platforms for signs that the stolen information is being circulated or misused. While there is currently no evidence that the data has been altered, deleted, or published, the investigation remains ongoing to determine the full extent of the breach. The attacker has not yet been identified, and the university continues to work with cybersecurity professionals and authorities to secure its systems and protect affected students.

Featured