Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Showing posts with label PoC Exploit Code. Show all posts

LogoFAIL: UEFI Vulnerabilities Unveiled

The discovery of vulnerabilities is a sharp reminder of the ongoing conflict between innovation and malevolent intent in the ever-evolving field of cybersecurity. The tech community has been shaken by the recent discovery of LogoFAIL, a set of vulnerabilities hidden in the Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) code that could allow malicious bootkit insertion through images during system boot.

Researchers have delved into the intricacies of LogoFAIL, shedding light on its implications and the far-reaching consequences of exploiting image parsing vulnerabilities in UEFI code. The vulnerability was aptly named 'LogoFAIL' due to its origin in the parsing of logos during the boot process. The severity of the issue is evident from the fact that it can be exploited to inject malicious code, potentially leading to the deployment of boot kits — a type of malware capable of persistently infecting the system at a fundamental level.

The vulnerability was first brought to public attention through a detailed report by Bleeping Computer, outlining the specifics of the LogoFAIL bugs and their potential impact on system security. The report highlights the technical nuances of the vulnerabilities, emphasizing how attackers could exploit weaknesses in UEFI code to compromise the integrity of the boot process.

Further exploration of LogoFAIL is presented in a comprehensive set of slides from a Black Hat USA 2009 presentation by researcher Rafal Wojtczuk. The slides provide an in-depth analysis of the attack vectors associated with LogoFAIL, offering valuable insights into the technical aspects of the vulnerabilities.

In a more recent context, the Black Hat Europe 2023 schedule includes a briefing on LogoFAIL, promising to delve into the security implications of image parsing during system boot. This presentation will likely provide an updated perspective on the ongoing efforts to address and mitigate the risks that LogoFAIL poses.

The gravity of LogoFAIL is underscored by additional resources such as the analysis on binarly.io and the UEFI Forum's document on firmware security concerns and best practices. Collectively, these sources highlight the urgency for the industry to address and remediate the vulnerabilities in the UEFI code, emphasizing the need for robust security measures to safeguard systems from potential exploitation.

Working together to solve these vulnerabilities becomes critical as the cybersecurity community struggles with the consequences of LogoFAIL. The industry must collaborate to establish robust countermeasures for the UEFI code, guaranteeing system resilience against the constantly changing cyber threat environment.


Onapsis Report: Flaws to be Fixed Immediately

CISA urged government organizations to fix the seven vulnerabilities it had added to its inventory on Thursday by September 8. The 'Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog' is a list of CISA vulnerabilities that should be patched because they are known to be actively exploited in cyberattacks. 
List of vulnerabilities actively used by hackers, including the most recent security bugs from Apple. Google, SAP, and Microsoft.

Vulnerabilities

Onapsis disclosed the major SAP CVE-2022-22536 vulnerability in February and gave it a 10/10 severity level. CISA promptly alerted administrators of the need to fix the flaw because failure to do so could result in data loss, risks of financial fraud, disruptions of crucial business processes, ransomware attacks, and the cessation of all operations

The vendor addressed the issue in February in Web Dispatcher, Content Server 7.53, NetWeaver Application Server ABAP, NetWeaver Application Server Java, and ABAP Platform.

According to Doyhenard's research study, "both CVE-2022-22536 and CVE-2022-22532 were remotely exploitable and could be utilized by unauthenticated attackers to entirely compromise any SAP installation on the planet."

On Wednesday, Apple announced security upgrades for the CVE-2022-32893 and CVE-2022-32894 flaws in macOS and iOS/iPadOS, stating that these vulnerabilities might be used to execute code on unsecured devices.

Apple did not explain how the vulnerabilities were being exploited, however, given that CVE-2022-32894 permits code to be run with kernel privileges, it would enable total device takeover.

Google Chrome 104.0.5112.101, which was released on Tuesday, has a remedy for the CVE-2022-2856 vulnerability. Vulnerability researcher Hossein Lotfi found more information about the problem, albeit it hasn't been disclosed how hackers have used it in attacks.

Microsoft resolved the CVE-2022-21971 remote code execution vulnerability in the February 2022 Patch Tuesday, but there is no data on how it is currently being used in the wild. However, CVE-2022-26923 affects Active Directory Domain Services and involves privilege escalation. Days after Microsoft issued a fix in May, PoC exploits started to surface.

Martin Doyhenard, an Onapsis researcher, will give a paper on exploiting inter-process communication in SAP's HTTP server on August 10 at the Black Hat conference and on August 13 at the Def Con conference. The 18-page document Onapsis published describing its findings is also available.

FCEB agencies are required to address the discovered vulnerabilities by the deadline to safeguard their networks from attacks that take advantage of the flaws in the catalog, as stated in Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-0: Reducing the Significant Risk of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities.

IoT and OT Impacted by Forescout Proof-of-Concept Ransomware Attack

 

Attackers will grow as defenders improve at resisting double extortion. Rather than focusing on IT, an option is to target operational technology (OT). Attacks on OT are not only harder to execute, but their consequences are also more difficult to mitigate.

Vedere Labs, a division of Forescout, has released a proof of concept (PoC) for a 'ransomware' attack that employs IoT for access, IT for traversal, and OT for detonation. Commonly known as R4IoT, it's the latest version of ransomware. R4IoT's ultimate purpose is to get an initial foothold by exploiting exposed and unprotected IoT devices like IP cameras, then installing ransomware in the IT network and using poor operational security procedures to enslave mission-critical systems. 

"It basically comes out of our observation of the shifting nature of the threat actors involved in ransomware — they've been changing strategies in the last couple of years," Daniel dos Santos, head of security research at Forescout's Vedere Labs, explained. The tipping point for thieves to start attacking such devices for ransomware assaults, according to dos Santos, "will most likely be when the IT and OT devices cross 50%." "And that'll be very soon. It will take between one and two years." 

According to the survey, Axis and Hikvision account for 77% of the IP cameras used by Forescout's 1,400 global customers. Axis cameras alone were responsible for 39% of the total. "This shows that exploiting IP camera flaws as a repeatable point of entry to a variety of businesses is a possibility," stated dos Santos in a report. 

In a neutral setting, this may mean infiltrating a corporate network system to drop ransomware and retrieve other payloads from a remote server to deploy cryptocurrency miners and perform DoS assaults against OT assets. Organizations should identify and patch vulnerable devices, enforce network segmentation, adopt strong password rules, and monitor HTTPS connections, FTP sessions, and network traffic to reduce the possibility and impact of possible R4IoT incidents.

"Ransomware has been the most frequent threat in recent years, and it has largely crippled enterprises by exploiting flaws in traditional IT equipment," the researchers noted. Dos Santos advised using the NIST Cybersecurity Framework and zero-trust architecture, as well as effective network segmentation.

For Three Years, Leading Messaging Servers were Scammed Using a URL Rendering Method

 

A complex URL rendering method has now been revealed as the source of global phishing attacks on several popular messaging and email systems.  Whatsapp, Instagram, iMessage, Facebook Messenger, and Signal were all popular platforms. Over three years, this allegedly allowed some malicious attackers to create realistic-looking phishing texts. 

Experts feel the unexpected finding has arrived at precisely the right time. Furthermore, researchers claim so by injecting right to left override, these rendering issues generate a vulnerability in the application's interface by displaying wrong URLs (RTLO). 

Unicode Control Characters with these names render all clients more vulnerable to URI spoofing attacks. When an RTLO character is injected into a string, it enables the string to be shown right-to-left instead of left-to-right in a browser or messenger app. The majority of the time, this character is used to display Arabic or Hebrew messages. 

The majority of individuals are prime targets, with the final goal of acquiring access to phishing attempts by spoofing several well-known domains. A handful of these flaws have been awarded a CVE which affects a wide variety of IM program versions. 

  • CVE-2020-20093 — Facebook Messenger 227.0 or earlier on iOS and 228.1.0.10.116 or earlier on Android 
  • (CVE-2020-20093) CVE-2020-20094 — Instagram version 106.0 or earlier on iOS, and version 107.0.0.11 or earlier on Android C
  • CVE-2020-20095 — iOS 14.3 or older with iMessage
  • CVE-2020-20096 — WhatsApp 2.19.80 or earlier (iOS) and 2.19.222 or earlier (Android) 

Signal, thankfully, does not have a CVE because the exact attack method was made evident to them. 
The CVE IDs are  ancient as the vulnerabilities were first discovered in August 2019 by a researcher  named 'zadewg.' 

When two independent URLs are concatenated to look like a single entity, for example, if they are judged to be two different URLs. And if a person clicks on the URL on the left, they will be led to one website, whilst clicking on the URL on the right will take them to another. 

According to research, the rendering problem does not work as effectively on email platforms such as Outlook.com, ProtonMail, or Gmail. However, many people might predict a series of attacks on other IM or email apps. 

The one-liner PoC is freely available and simple to use, even for those with no technical knowledge or no hacking expertise. In fact, even when more advanced technical principles are involved, there is ample evidence of RTLO-based misuse in the field. 

Several more IM and email programs are likely vulnerable to the same exploit, but only those listed above have been proven as vulnerable. As a result, users of the listed apps should be vigilant when receiving messages with URLs, always click on the left side, and keep an eye out for app security upgrades which may fix the problem.

Hackers Can Use a Replay Attack Due to a Honda Vulnerability

 

A 'replay attack' vulnerability has been discovered in specific Honda and Acura automobile models, allowing a nearby hacker to open the car and even start it from a short distance. The threat actor captures the RF signals transferred from the key fob to the automobile and resends them to gain control of the victim's car's remote keyless entry unit. 

A hostile hacker can employ a replay attack to mislead a website or service into giving them access to the user by recycling the information used to identify the user. If a hacker can find and repeat a specific string of information, someone can use it to deceive a website into believing it was there, allowing anyone to get access to the online account.

Attackers might utilize CVE-2022-27254 to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attack, or more particularly a replay attack, in which someone intercepted and manipulated the RF signals sent from a remote key fob to the automobile, and then re-transmitted these signals at a later time to unlock the car at his leisure. 

According to analysts, Blake Berry, Hong Liu, and Ruolin Zhou of the University of Massachusetts, as well as Cybereason Chief Security Officer Sam Curry, who discovered the vulnerability, the vulnerability in earlier models is mostly unaddressed. Honda owners, on the other hand, maybe able to defend themselves against such an attack. The remote engine start portion of the problem is also demonstrated in a video supplied by the researchers, however, no technical details or proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit code were published at the time. 

The Honda Civic (LX, EX, EX-L, Touring, Si, and Type R) models from 2016 through 2020 are the most afflicted by this issue. In a GitHub repository, Blake Berry explained it was also possible to change the intercepted commands and re-send them to get a completely different result. 

According to the experts' recommendations, automotive manufacturers should include "rolling codes," also known as "hopping codes." This security method responds to each authentication request with a unique code, ensuring the codes cannot be "replayed" by an offender at a later time. However, "At this moment, Honda has no plans to update older vehicles," the company stated. "It's crucial to remember this, while Honda is always improving security features as new models are released, motivated and technologically sophisticated thieves are striving to circumvent those safeguards." 

When not in use, users should store the key fobs in signal-blocking 'Faraday pouches', however, this strategy won't prevent a determined attacker from eavesdropping on signals when the fob is utilized. Consumers should choose Passive Keyless Entry (PKE) over Remote Keyless Entry (RKE), which makes it much tougher for an intruder to clone/read the signal due to the closeness they would need to be at to do so.

PoC Exploit Code Published for macOS Gatekeeper Bypass Vulnerability

 

Cybersecurity researcher Rasmus of F-Secure has published a proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit code for a macOS Gatekeeper bypass vulnerability that Apple fixed earlier this year in April. 

The PoC exploit code targets CVE-2021-1810, a flaw that can lead to the bypass of all three protections that Apple executed against downloading malicious files in macOS – file quarantine, Gatekeeper, and notarization. 

The vulnerability was spotted in the Archive Utility component of macOS Big Sur and Catalina and can be abused via a specially designed ZIP file. To successfully exploit the flaw, an attacker must trick a user into installing and opening an archive to implement malicious code inside. 

By exploiting the flaw, the attacker can implement unsigned binaries on macOS devices, even if the Gatekeeper enforces code signing or warn user of the malicious code implementation . According to Sten, the flaw is related to the way in which the Archive Utility handles file paths. Particularly, for paths longer than 886 characters, the com.apple.quarantine extended attribute would no longer apply, resulting in a Gatekeeper bypass for the files. 

While researching edge cases with long path filenames, the researcher identified that some macOS components acted surprisingly when the total path length reached a certain limit. Finally, Sten identified that it was feasible to design an archive with a hierarchical structure for which the path length was long enough so that Safari would call Archive Utility to unpack it and that Archive Utility would not apply the com.apple.quarantine attribute, but short enough to be browsable using Finder and for macOS to execute the code within. 

“In order to make it more appealing to the user, the archive folder structure could be hidden (prefixed with a full stop) with a symbolic link in the root which was almost indistinguishable from a single app bundle in the archive root,” the researcher explained in his blog post. 

The researcher also published a video demo of the exploit that creates the archive with the path length necessary to bypass CVE-2021-1810, along with a symbolic link to make the ZIP file look normal. The flaw was addressed with the release of macOS Big Sur 11.3 and Security Update 2021-002 for Catalina.