Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Latest News

ShinyHunters Leak Exposes Harvard and UPenn Personal Data

  Hacking group ShinyHunters has reportedly published more than a million records stolen from Harvard University and the University of Penns...

All the recent news you need to know

Inspector Satellites and Orbital Security Risks in Modern Space Infrastructure

 

Not far from familiar orbits, small satellites labeled as inspectors are starting to raise questions about safety above Earth. Lately, signs point to Russian vehicles moving near critical communication platforms - moves seen as unusually close by many experts. Such actions stir unease across national authorities, military planners, and firms tied to satellite networks worldwide. Little by little, these events reveal a shift: space no longer just a zone of cooperation, but one where watching, listening, and taking position matter more than before. 

One way to look at it is through military and spy evaluations: the spacecraft known as Luch-1 and Luch-2 belong to Moscow’s fleet meant for monitoring other orbiting machines. Tracking records show Luch-2, sent up in March 2023, moving unusually close to more than a dozen European satellites. High above Earth - about 36,000 km - the craft operates within an orbital belt where units stay locked over one spot on the ground. 

High above Earth, geostationary orbit holds unique importance. Satellites here handle telecom signals, national defense networks, TV broadcasts, storm tracking, along with classified government links. Since each craft stays fixed above one spot on the planet, services remain constant across time zones and emergencies alike. Should an unknown satellite shift close without warning, such movement draws immediate attention from control centers worldwide. 

Security experts in Europe suspect the Luch satellites could be tapping into transmissions from several regional communication platforms. Radio links, tightly aimed between Earth terminals and orbiting craft, carry these exchanges. Sitting close to those pathways - either incoming or outgoing - a satellite might pick up what is sent, particularly when protective coding is weak or old. Gathering such information counts as signal surveillance, known as SIGINT; doing so from space offers ongoing reach into critical traffic streams. 

Worry isn’t limited to public infrastructure alone. Some of these orbiting platforms were said to serve private businesses alongside national agencies, backing up operations like those run by Intelsat. Because they fulfill civilian and strategic roles, their vulnerability grows - today’s armed forces lean on commercial space links for communication channels, moving information, and reaching remote computing resources. When such networks face interference, consequences may ripple through military planning, disaster reaction setups, air traffic messaging, or the synchronization of banking transfers. 

Not just monitoring, but deliberate meddling raises concern among authorities. Close-orbiting satellites might, under certain conditions, disrupt communications through signal manipulation or noise flooding. Even without crashes in space, proven precision in approaching vital infrastructure alters strategic calculations globally. Repeated incidents targeting British military satellite links confirm combat now extends beyond ground-based systems. 

Though updated models now include defenses like shifting signal frequencies, smart antenna adjustments, or improved data coding, security levels differ - especially on legacy commercial units still active. While some agencies and companies pour resources into monitoring tools for orbital activity, spotting odd patterns as they happen remains a priority. Older hardware often lags behind when it comes to resilience against modern threats. 

Nowadays, dependence on space technology keeps growing - so does the link between orbit safety and digital protection. Because global guidelines for close-up satellite activities remain sparse, maneuvers by inspection craft push demands for better rules. These safeguards aim to shield vital networks running everyday online functions. What happens above affects what happens below.

Infostealer Breach Exposes OpenClaw AI Agent Configurations in Emerging Cyber Threat

 

Cybersecurity experts have uncovered a new incident in which an information-stealing malware successfully extracted sensitive configuration data from OpenClaw, an AI agent platform previously known as Clawdbot and Moltbot. The breach signals a notable expansion in the capabilities of infostealers, now extending beyond traditional credential theft into artificial intelligence environments.

"This finding marks a significant milestone in the evolution of infostealer behavior: the transition from stealing browser credentials to harvesting the 'souls' and identities of personal AI [artificial intelligence] agents," Hudson Rock said.

According to Alon Gal, CTO of Hudson Rock, the malware involved is likely a variant of Vidar, a commercially available information stealer that has been active since late 2018. He shared the details in a statement to The Hacker News.

Investigators clarified that the data theft was not carried out using a specialized OpenClaw-focused module. Instead, the malware leveraged a broad file-harvesting mechanism designed to search for sensitive file extensions and directory paths. Among the compromised files were:
  • openclaw.json – Containing the OpenClaw gateway authentication token, a redacted email address, and the user’s workspace path.
  • device.json – Storing cryptographic keys used for secure pairing and digital signing within the OpenClaw ecosystem.
  • soul.md – Documenting the AI agent’s operational philosophy, behavioral parameters, and ethical guidelines.
Security researchers warned that stealing the gateway token could enable attackers to remotely access a victim’s local OpenClaw instance if exposed online, or impersonate the client in authenticated gateway interactions.

"While the malware may have been looking for standard 'secrets,' it inadvertently struck gold by capturing the entire operational context of the user's AI assistant," Hudson Rock added. "As AI agents like OpenClaw become more integrated into professional workflows, infostealer developers will likely release dedicated modules specifically designed to decrypt and parse these files, much like they do for Chrome or Telegram today."

The disclosure follows mounting scrutiny over OpenClaw’s security posture. The platform’s maintainers recently announced a collaboration with VirusTotal to examine potentially malicious skills uploaded to ClawHub, strengthen its threat model, and introduce misconfiguration auditing tools.

Last week, the OpenSourceMalware research team reported an active ClawHub campaign that bypasses VirusTotal detection. Instead of embedding malicious payloads directly within SKILL.md files, threat actors are hosting malware on imitation OpenClaw websites and using the skills as decoys.

"The shift from embedded payloads to external malware hosting shows threat actors adapting to detection capabilities," security researcher Paul McCarty said. "As AI skill registries grow, they become increasingly attractive targets for supply chain attacks."

Another concern raised by OX Security involves Moltbook, a Reddit-style forum built specifically for AI agents operating on OpenClaw. Researchers found that AI agent accounts created on Moltbook cannot currently be deleted, leaving users without a clear method to remove associated data.

Meanwhile, the STRIKE Threat Intelligence team at SecurityScorecard identified hundreds of thousands of publicly exposed OpenClaw instances, potentially opening the door to remote code execution (RCE) attacks.

"RCE vulnerabilities allow an attacker to send a malicious request to a service and execute arbitrary code on the underlying system," the cybersecurity company said. "When OpenClaw runs with permissions to email, APIs, cloud services, or internal resources, an RCE vulnerability can become a pivot point. A bad actor does not need to break into multiple systems. They need one exposed service that already has authority to act."

Since its launch in November 2025, OpenClaw has experienced rapid adoption, amassing more than 200,000 stars on GitHub. On February 15, 2026, Sam Altman announced that OpenClaw founder Peter Steinberger would be joining OpenAI, stating, "OpenClaw will live in a foundation as an open source project that OpenAI will continue to support."

Hackers Leak 600000 Customer Records as Canada Goose Opens Investigation


 

Luxury retail is a rarefied industry where reputations travel faster than seasonal collections. Canada Goose, a brand associated with Arctic-quality craftsmanship and premium exclusivity, is now facing scrutiny from an unexpected part of the internet. 

In a cyber incident that the outerwear company insists did not originate within its walls, a cache of customer transaction data has appeared on a notorious ransomware leak site, putting the company at the center of the cyber incident that appears to have originated from a cache of customer transaction information. It has been reported that hackers have compromised Canada Goose's internal systems, but the luxury clothing brand maintains that its systems have not been compromised. 

On ShinyHunters' data leak portal, Canada Goose has been listed as having had 600,000 customer records exfiltrated by the notorious ransomware collective ShinyHunters. This dataset, which is approximately 1.67 gigabytes in size, contains detailed information regarding e-commerce orders, such as customer names, addresses, telephone numbers, and credit card numbers. 

It is the company's preliminary assessment that the exposed information relates to historical customer transactions, and no evidence indicates a breach of Canada Goose's corporate network has yet to be discovered. In response to the company's statements, it is actively reviewing the authenticity, origin, and scope of the dataset and will take appropriate measures if any potential risks to customers arise. 

There are partial details in the leaked records, including payment card brand names, the final four digits of card numbers, and in some cases, the first six digits of the issuing bank's name. Among the additional data in the dataset are payment authorization metadata, order histories, device and browser information, and transaction values.

Despite the absence of full credit card numbers, cybersecurity experts warn that even partial financial and transactional information can be manipulated to facilitate targeted scams, social engineering attacks, and fraud schemes. As part of its public denial, ShinyHunters has not indicated that the Canada Goose dataset is connected with recent social engineering campaigns targeted at single sign-on environments and cloud infrastructures.

In its claim, the group asserts that the records are a result of a breach of the payment processor in August 2025, a claim which has not been independently verified. According to the structure of the leaked data, it may have been derived from a hosted storefront or external payment processing platform, a fact that may support the group's assertion.

ShinyHunters has established itself as a company that penetrates e-commerce ecosystems, SaaS platforms, and cloud-hosted services, obtaining and publishing large quantities of consumer data in order to exert additional pressure on these companies. As described in threat intelligence assessments, ShinyHunters are an established data extortion operation with a history of obtaining and publicizing significant amounts of customer information from leading brands and online platforms.

Since the early 2010s, the group has been associated with a number of high-profile intrusions that frequently target e-commerce ecosystems, software as a service providers, and cloud environments where large datasets can be aggregated and monetized. 

A number of security researchers have also linked the collective with voice phishing and other social-engineering techniques aimed at compromising corporate credentials and shifting into cloud-based systems. In accordance with established patterns, stolen data is typically leveraged for financial coercion, sold on underground marketplaces, or published publicly on the leak portal of the group when ransom demands have not been met. 

Currently, it is not possible to determine whether Canada Goose has impacted customers in the exact manner described above. The company has stated it is examining the dataset to determine its authenticity, origin, and breadth before making a determination regarding whether customer notifications will be necessary.

There is a report that the exposed records contain partial payment card information, including the brand name of the card, the final four digits of the card number, and the ISIN number of the issuing bank, as well as details regarding the payment authorization. 

Cybersecurity professionals note that, even if full primary account numbers are not presented, truncated financial information, when combined with names, contact information, and transaction histories, can materially increase the success rate of targeted phishing schemes, credential harvesting schemes, and fraud schemes.

In addition to purchase histories, order values, and device and browser metadata, the dataset contains transaction information as well. Using such contextual information may allow adversaries to identify high spenders and develop convincing, transaction specific lures that mimic legitimate post-purchase correspondences.

Despite the lack of complete payment card details, the level of granularity increases downstream risk. Separately, ShinyHunters has recently been linked by independent researchers to a series of social engineering campaigns aimed at compromising single-sign-on environments and cloud accounts through social engineering.

According to the group, when questioned whether there was a correlation between those operations and the Canada Goose data, they denied such a connection, stating that the records were a consequence of a breach at a third-party payment processor dating back to August 2025. This assertion has not been independently verified. 

There is an apparent similarity between the structure of the leaked files including field labels such as checkout identifiers, shipping line entries, cart tokens, and cancellation metadata and export schemas that are typically generated by hosted storefronts and payment processing platforms. Although this does not establish the provenance of the data definitively, it indicates that the data may have originated within the environment of an external service provider rather than from a direct compromise of the retailer’s internal systems. 

It is evident that the incident underscores a broader reality facing retailers operating in increasingly interconnected digital supply chains. While core systems may remain unchanged, exposure risks may arise from third-party integrations which handle payments, order processing, and customer data storage. 

It has been observed by industry analysts that organizations that utilize external commerce and payment infrastructure must conduct rigorous vendor risk assessments, monitor their vendors continuously, and coordinate incident response procedures to limit downstream exposure. 

Customers are advised to maintain increased vigilance against unsolicited communications that reference past purchases or payment activity until the scope of the data is conclusively understood. 

A key takeaway from this episode is that data stewardship goes far beyond corporate boundaries, and resilience relies on ecosystem oversight as much as internal security protocols.

More U.S. Investors Join Legal Dispute With South Korea Over Coupang Data Breach

 



A fresh wave of U.S.-based investment firms has joined an ongoing legal confrontation with the government of South Korea over its handling of a large scale cybersecurity incident involving Coupang.

On February 11, it was confirmed that three additional investors, Abrams Capital, Durable Capital Partners, and Foxhaven Asset Management, have formally moved to participate in arbitration proceedings. These firms are aligning with Greenoaks Capital and Altimeter Capital, which had already initiated legal action. By filing official notices, the new claimants are adopting and supporting the earlier case rather than launching a separate one.

At the center of the dispute is an allegation that South Korean authorities unfairly targeted Coupang and, by extension, other U.S.-linked businesses operating in the country. The investors claim that Seoul’s regulatory response following a large-scale consumer data breach amounted to discriminatory treatment that caused severe financial harm.

The controversy traces back to a disclosure made in November, when Coupang announced that personal information belonging to roughly 33 million customers in South Korea had been exposed in a cyber incident. Data breaches of this scale typically involve unauthorized access to customer records, which may include names, contact information, and other identifying details. The announcement triggered widespread public concern, political scrutiny, legal complaints, and cross-border tensions.

According to the investors pursuing arbitration, the government’s actions after the breach significantly affected shareholder value, resulting in losses amounting to billions of dollars. They argue that the regulatory measures taken were disproportionate and damaged investor confidence.

In addition to arbitration efforts, the newly joined investors have sent letters supporting calls for a formal review by U.S. authorities into South Korea’s conduct. Neil Mehta, founder and managing partner of Greenoaks Capital, stated that American policymakers and investors increasingly view the case as an example of the need to defend U.S. companies against what they see as unfair foreign government actions.

Coupang was established in 2010 by Korean-American entrepreneur Bom Kim, a graduate of Harvard University. Over the past decade, it has become the most widely used e-commerce platform in South Korea, surpassing long-established domestic conglomerates such as Shinsegae in online retail presence. The company has expanded beyond traditional online shopping into food delivery services, streaming platforms, and financial technology offerings, further strengthening its footprint in the country’s digital economy.

South Korea’s Justice Ministry has confirmed receipt of additional notices signaling intent to arbitrate. In an official statement, the ministry said it would respond in a systematic and professional manner through its International Investment Dispute Response Team, indicating that the government intends to formally defend its position.

The issue has also contributed to rising trade friction between Washington and Seoul. U.S. President Donald Trump has warned that tariffs on South Korean goods could increase to as much as 25 percent amid broader economic tensions.

Separately, the United States House Committee on the Judiciary recently issued a subpoena to Coupang as part of an ongoing investigation examining alleged discriminatory treatment of American companies operating abroad.

As arbitration proceedings advance, the case is expected to test not only corporate accountability in the wake of major data breaches, but also the strength of international investment protections and the diplomatic balance between two long-standing economic partners.

Microsoft Uncovers DNS-Based ClickFix Variant as Stealer Campaigns Escalate Across Windows and macOS

 

Microsoft has revealed a new evolution of the ClickFix social engineering technique, where attackers manipulate users into executing commands that initiate a Domain Name System (DNS) lookup to fetch a secondary malicious payload.

In this updated approach, threat actors use the “nslookup” command—short for nameserver lookup—triggered through the Windows Run dialog. The command performs a custom DNS query that retrieves instructions for the next stage of the attack.

ClickFix has gained traction in recent years and is commonly distributed through phishing emails, malvertising campaigns, and drive-by download schemes. Victims are typically redirected to fraudulent landing pages featuring fake CAPTCHA checks or fabricated system alerts, urging them to run commands in the Windows Run dialog or the macOS Terminal app to “resolve” non-existent issues.

The technique has spread rapidly over the past two years because it relies on users unknowingly infecting their own systems, effectively bypassing traditional security safeguards. Its success has led to multiple offshoots, including FileFix, JackFix, ConsentFix, CrashFix, and GlitchFix.

"In the latest DNS-based staging using ClickFix, the initial command runs through cmd.exe and performs a DNS lookup against a hard-coded external DNS server, rather than the system's default resolver," the Microsoft Threat Intelligence team said in a series of posts on X. "The output is filtered to extract the Name: DNS response, which is executed as the second-stage payload."

Microsoft explained that this variation uses DNS as a “lightweight staging or signaling channel,” allowing attackers to communicate with their infrastructure while introducing an additional validation layer before delivering the next payload.

"Using DNS in this way reduces dependency on traditional web requests and can help blend malicious activity into normal network traffic," the Windows maker added.

Following the DNS lookup, the attack chain downloads a ZIP archive from an external server (“azwsappdev[.]com”). Inside is a malicious Python script that conducts system reconnaissance, executes discovery commands, and drops a Visual Basic Script (VBScript). That VBScript launches ModeloRAT—a Python-based remote access trojan previously linked to CrashFix campaigns.

To maintain persistence, the malware creates a Windows shortcut (LNK) file in the Startup folder, ensuring automatic execution whenever the system reboots.

Lumma Stealer and CastleLoader Activity Intensifies

Separately, Bitdefender has reported a spike in Lumma Stealer operations, fueled by ClickFix-style fake CAPTCHA campaigns. These attacks deploy an AutoIt-based version of CastleLoader, a loader attributed to a threat actor known as GrayBravo (formerly TAG-150).

CastleLoader checks for virtualization environments and certain security software before decrypting and executing the stealer in memory. Beyond ClickFix tactics, attackers are also using websites offering cracked software and pirated movies to lure victims into downloading malicious installers disguised as MP4 files.

Additional campaigns have delivered a counterfeit NSIS installer that runs obfuscated VBA scripts before launching AutoIt components responsible for loading Lumma Stealer. The VBA component establishes scheduled tasks to ensure persistence.

"Despite significant law enforcement disruption efforts in 2025, Lumma Stealer operations continued, demonstrating resilience by rapidly migrating to new hosting providers and adapting alternative loaders and delivery techniques," the Romanian cybersecurity company said. "At the core of many of these campaigns is CastleLoader, which plays a central role in helping LummaStealer spread through delivery chains."

One domain tied to CastleLoader infrastructure (“testdomain123123[.]shop”) was also identified as a Lumma Stealer command-and-control (C2) server, suggesting possible collaboration or shared services between operators. India has recorded the highest number of Lumma infections, followed by France, the U.S., Spain, Germany, Brazil, Mexico, Romania, Italy, and Canada.

"The effectiveness of ClickFix lies in its abuse of procedural trust rather than technical vulnerabilities," Bitdefender said. "The instructions resemble troubleshooting steps or verification workarounds that users may have encountered previously. As a result, victims often fail to recognize that they are manually executing arbitrary code on their own system."

Expanding Threat Landscape: RenEngine, macOS Stealers, and Malvertising

CastleLoader is not the only distribution mechanism in play. Since March 2025, campaigns using RenEngine Loader have spread Lumma Stealer through fake game cheats and pirated applications such as CorelDRAW. In these cases, RenEngine deploys Hijack Loader, which then installs the stealer. Kaspersky data shows primary impact in Russia, Brazil, Turkey, Spain, Germany, Mexico, Algeria, Egypt, Italy, and France.

Meanwhile, macOS users are increasingly being targeted. A campaign leveraging phishing and malvertising techniques has distributed Odyssey Stealer—a rebranded version of Poseidon Stealer and a fork of Atomic macOS Stealer (AMOS). The malware steals credentials and cryptocurrency wallet data from over 200 browser wallet extensions and multiple desktop wallet apps.

"Beyond credential theft, Odyssey operates as a full remote access trojan," Censys said. "A persistent LaunchDaemon polls the C2 every 60 seconds for commands, supporting arbitrary shell execution, reinfection, and a SOCKS5 proxy for tunneling traffic through victim machines."

Other campaigns include:
  • Fake CAPTCHA pages on compromised websites tricking Windows users into running PowerShell commands that deploy StealC.
  • Email phishing attacks using malicious SVG files inside password-protected ZIP archives to deliver the open-source .NET stealer Stealerium.
  • Abuse of generative AI platforms such as Claude to host ClickFix instructions distributed via sponsored Google search results.
  • Fake Medium articles impersonating Apple’s Support Team to spread macOS stealers via domains like “raxelpak[.]com.”
"The C2 domain raxelpak[.]com has URL history going back to 2021, when it appeared to host a safety workwear e-commerce site," MacPaw's Moonlock Lab said. "Whether the domain was hijacked or simply expired and re-registered by the [threat actor] is unclear, but it fits the broader pattern of leveraging aged domains with existing reputation to avoid detection."

Malvertising abuse has also raised concerns. "The ad shows a real, recognized domain (claude.ai), not a spoof or typo-squatted site," AdGuard said. "Clicking the ad leads to a real Claude page, not a phishing copy. The consequence is clear: Google Ads + a well-known trusted platform + technical users with high downstream impact = a potent malware distribution vector."

macOS Threats on the Rise

Security researchers note a broader shift toward targeting Apple systems with advanced infostealers. According to recent analysis, macOS stealers now target more than 100 Chrome cryptocurrency extensions, and attackers are even acquiring legitimate Apple developer signatures to bypass Gatekeeper protections.

"Nearly every macOS stealer prioritizes cryptocurrency theft above all else," the company said. "This laser focus reflects economic reality. Cryptocurrency users disproportionately use Macs. They often hold significant value in software wallets. Unlike bank accounts, crypto transactions are irreversible. Once seed phrases are compromised, funds disappear permanently with no recourse."

"The 'Macs don't get viruses' assumption is not just outdated but actively dangerous. Organizations with Mac users need detection capabilities for macOS-specific TTPs: unsigned applications requesting passwords, unusual Terminal activity, connections to blockchain nodes for non-financial purposes, and data exfiltration patterns targeting Keychain and browser storage."


Volvo Hit in Conduent Breach Affecting 25 Million

 

A major data breach at business services provider Conduent has spiraled into a large-scale security incident affecting at least 25 million people across the United States, with Volvo Group North America among the latest victims. The breach, originally disclosed in early 2025, is now understood to be far more extensive than first reported, impacting residents in multiple states and exposing sensitive personal data. Texas authorities now estimate that 15 million people have been affected, up from an initial 4 million, while more than 10 million individuals in Oregon have also been caught up in the incident.

Conduent first confirmed in November 2025 that a cyberattack in January 2025 had exposed personal data belonging to over 10 million people. The compromised information included names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and health and insurance details, making it highly valuable for identity theft and fraud. Earlier, in April 2025, the company had revealed that attackers stole names and Social Security numbers during the same January intrusion, highlighting a pattern of gradually escalating disclosures as the scale of the breach became clearer.

Operational disruption accompanied the data exposure, as Conduent disclosed that a January cyberattack caused service outages impacting agencies in multiple U.S. states. Wisconsin and Oklahoma reported issues affecting payments and customer support, underscoring how attacks on back-office providers can cascade into interruptions of public services. Subsequent investigation determined that hackers had maintained access to Conduent’s network from October 21, 2024, to January 13, 2025, giving them ample time to exfiltrate personal data, including Social Security numbers, dates of birth, addresses, and health-related information.

The Safepay ransomware group later claimed responsibility for the attack in February 2025, adding an extortion dimension to the incident. Conduent, which offers printing and mailroom services, document processing, payment integrity, and other back-office support, has been sending breach notifications on behalf of affected clients, including Volvo Group North America. According to a filing with the Maine Attorney General, Volvo reported that 16,991 employees were impacted, and the company said it only learned of the incident in January 2026, many months after the original intrusion window.

In its notification letters, Conduent informed individuals that some of their personal information may have been involved due to services provided to their current or former health plans. The company stated it is not aware of any attempted or actual misuse of the compromised data but is urging recipients to consider steps to protect themselves. As part of its response, Conduent is offering free identity protection services to those affected, reflecting ongoing concern about long-term risks posed by the theft of such highly sensitive information.

Featured