Search This Blog
Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

About Me

Load More
Trendy Right Now

Popular Posts

Latest News

AI Technology is Helping Criminal Groups Grow Stronger in Europe, Europol Warns

  The European Union’s main police agency, Europol, has raised an alarm about how artificial intelligence (AI) is now being misused by crimi...

All the recent news you need to know
Ransomware attack
Cyber Security Cybersecurity Digital Security free file converter risks Identity Theft malware protection Online Safety Ransomware attack

FBI Warns Against Free Online File Converters as Potential Cybersecurity Threats

 

Free online file converters have become a popular choice for users looking to convert files into different formats. Whether transforming a PDF into a Word document or switching between media formats, these tools offer convenience with just a few clicks. However, the FBI has issued a warning about the hidden dangers associated with such services.

Despite their ease of use, free file conversion tools may serve as a gateway for malware, potentially compromising users’ sensitive data. According to TechRadar, the FBI has identified certain converters that embed malicious software into the converted files. This malware can infect the user's system, allowing hackers to steal personal and financial information undetected.

Once installed, malware can extract crucial data, including:
  • Full names and home addresses
  • Social Security numbers
  • Banking and financial details
  • Cryptocurrency wallets and access keys
The stolen information is often exploited for identity theft, financial fraud, and other cybercrimes. In some cases, hackers deploy ransomware, which locks victims out of their own systems and demands a hefty ransom for data recovery.

Ransomware attacks have surged, affecting both businesses and individuals. When malware encrypts files, victims face a difficult choice—either pay the ransom or lose access to critical data. The FBI emphasizes that these threats are not limited to corporations; everyday internet users relying on free online tools are also at risk. A report from Cisco Talos highlights ransomware as one of the most significant security threats in recent years.

Mark Michalek, FBI Denver Special Agent in Charge, advises that awareness and education are the best defenses against malware attacks. To minimize risks, users should follow these cybersecurity best practices:
  • Use trusted sources – Only download or use file conversion tools from reputable websites and developers.
  • Keep security software updated – Install and regularly update antivirus and anti-malware programs to detect potential threats.
  • Avoid suspicious links and attachments – Do not open files or click on links from unknown sources.
  • Maintain data backups – Regularly back up important files to prevent data loss in case of an attack.

If you suspect that malware has been installed through a file converter, take immediate action:
  • Disconnect from the internet to prevent further data compromise.
  • Run a full system scan using reputable antivirus software to detect and remove malicious files.
  • Report the incident to law enforcement to document the attack and seek assistance.
While free online file converters provide convenience, they also pose significant cybersecurity risks. Users must remain vigilant and prioritize safety when handling digital files. By adopting precautionary measures and staying informed, individuals can protect their sensitive data from cyber threats.
Read more »
threat report
2FA Cyber Attacks Phishing Campaign Roman Encryption threat report

Roman Encryption Employed In Nearly 9K Phishing Attacks

 

Unpredictability is a hallmark of cybersecurity work. I doubt you expected to read an article linking Julius Caesar, the ancient Roman ruler, to almost a million phishing attacks so far in 2025. But, here we are. The phishing threat continues to grow, motivated by the lure of disseminating infostealer malware and exemplified by more sophisticated efforts, as the FBI has warned. 

The majority of cybercriminals involved in phishing assaults are not malicious coding experts; rather, they are what you might refer to as low-level chancers, with little expertise but high aspirations for a lucrative payout. Phishing-as-a-service platforms, which eliminate the need for all that bothersome technical expertise, aid them in this evil undertaking. According to recently published research, Tycoon 2FA is the most popular of these platforms and that's where Julius Caesar comes in.

It should come as no surprise that phishing is a persistent menace to both consumers and organisations. These are no longer the simple "you've won the Canadian lottery" or "I'm a Nigerian Prince and want to give you money" hoaxes of the past, but, thanks to AI, they've become much more difficult to detect and, as a result, much tougher to resist. As previously stated, the use of phishing-as-a-service platforms to accelerate attack formulation and deployment is especially problematic. 

Barracuda Networks security researchers released a report on March 19 outlining a whopping one million attacks in January and February alone. This figure becomes even more concerning when you consider that one platform, Tycoon 2FA, accounted for 89% of them. 

Nuch of this seems to be recent, with an outbreak in the middle of February, according to Deerendra Prasad, an associate threat analyst in Barracuda Network's threat analyst team, who stated that an investigation "revealed that the platform has continued to develop and enhance its evasive mechanisms, becoming even harder to detect.”

The malicious scripts used to prevent defenders from analysing the phishing pages have been updated to help evade discovery, Prasad said. The new script is not in plain text, but—wait for it—encrypted using a shifting substitution cipher. Indeed, there is something called a Caesar Cipher. This works by replacing every plaintext letter in a string with another that is a specified number of letters down the alphabet. 

To be honest, it's about as simple as it gets, because decrypting such messages requires only the shift number. It is named after Julius Caesar, who was known to use encryption to keep his personal communication private while in transit. "This script is responsible for several processes," Prasad told me, "such as stealing user credentials and exfiltrating them to an attacker-controlled server.”
Read more »
Personal Data
Bank CyberSecurity Bank Data Leak Cleo Server CLOP Customer Data Data Breach Data Leak Data Theft Identity Theft Personal Data

Western Alliance Bank Data Breach Exposes Nearly 22,000 Customers’ Personal Information

 

Western Alliance Bank has alerted nearly 22,000 customers that their personal information was compromised following a cyberattack in October. The breach stemmed from a vulnerability in a third-party vendor’s secure file transfer software, which allowed attackers to gain unauthorized access to the bank’s systems and extract sensitive customer data. 

Western Alliance, a subsidiary of Western Alliance Bancorporation with over $80 billion in assets, first disclosed the incident in a February SEC filing. The bank revealed that hackers exploited a zero-day vulnerability in the software, which was officially disclosed on October 27, 2024. However, unauthorized access to the bank’s systems had already occurred between October 12 and October 24. The breach was only confirmed after the attackers leaked stolen files online. 

According to breach notification letters sent to 21,899 affected customers and filed with the Office of Maine’s Attorney General, the stolen data includes names, Social Security numbers, birth dates, financial account details, driver’s license numbers, tax identification numbers, and passport information if previously provided to the bank. Despite the exposure, Western Alliance stated there is no evidence of fraud or identity theft resulting from the breach. 

To support affected customers, the bank is offering one year of free identity protection services through Experian IdentityWorks Credit 3B. Although Western Alliance did not disclose the name of the compromised software in its SEC filing or customer notifications, the Clop ransomware gang has claimed responsibility for the attack. In January, Clop listed the bank among 58 companies targeted in a campaign that exploited a critical zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2024-50623) in Cleo LexiCom, VLTransfer, and Harmony software. 

The ransomware group had previously leveraged similar security flaws in MOVEit Transfer, GoAnywhere MFT, and Accellion FTA to conduct large-scale data theft operations. Further investigations revealed that Clop exploited an additional zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2024-55956) in Cleo software in December. This allowed them to deploy a Java-based backdoor, dubbed “Malichus,” enabling deeper infiltration into victims’ networks. Cleo, which serves over 4,000 organizations worldwide, confirmed the vulnerability had been used to install malicious backdoor code in affected instances of its Harmony, VLTrader, and LexiCom software. 

The full extent of the breach remains unclear, but it highlights the growing risks posed by vulnerabilities in third-party software. Organizations relying on such solutions must remain vigilant, promptly apply security patches, and implement robust defenses to prevent similar incidents.
Read more »
Vulnerabiliies
Cyber Security Cyberattacks GitHub Security Breach Supply Chain. CI/CD Vulnerabiliies

GitHub Action Security Breach Raises Concerns Over Supply Chain Risks

 


An attack of a cascading supply chain was recently triggered by the compromise of the GitHub action "reviewdog/action-setup@v1", which ultimately led to the security breach of the "tj-actions/changed-files" repository. As a result of this breach, unintended secrets about continuous integration and delivery were exposed, raising concerns about the integrity of software supply chains. 

There was a malicious code in the tj-actions/changed-files application last week, which introduced malicious code that was capable of extracting CI/CD secrets from the workflow logs and logging them within the log files. This incident affected approximately 23,000 repositories. Even though these logs were not accessible to the public, this exposure highlights significant security risks. In the case that the logs had become public, the attacker would have been able to gain unauthorized access to vital credentials.

Even though there has been an ongoing investigation into tj-actions/changed files, its developers have been unable to determine exactly how the attackers compromised GitHub's Personal Access Token (PAT) to gain access to critical data. For the unauthorized changes to be made, this token, which was used by an automated bot to modify code, appears to have played a pivotal role in the process. GitHub Actions and CI/CD pipelines need to be enhanced to prevent the spread of software supply chain vulnerabilities. This incident underscores the increasing threat of software supply chain vulnerabilities. 

A critical security breach has been identified in the widely used third-party GitHub Action, tj-actions/changed-files, that has been assigned the CVE-2025-30066 vulnerability. When a supply chain attack compromises the action that tracks file changes in pull requests and commits, it results in unauthorized disclosure of sensitive credentials since this action tracks file modifications. Among the secrets that were exposed were valid access keys, GitHub Personal Access Tokens (PATs), npm tokens, and private RSA keys. 

A security patch was implemented in version 46.0.1 as a response to the incident to mitigate the risk associated with it. As a result of an updated analysis from March 19, 2025, security researchers have suggested that this breach may have been the result of a similar compromise of another GitHub action, reviewdog/action-setup@v1, identified as CVE-2025-30154 by security researchers. Considering the timing of both incidents and the growing threat landscape surrounding software supply chains, there is a strong likelihood that there is a connection between them. 

The developments highlighted in this article underscore the importance of conducting rigorous security audits and maintaining enhanced monitoring practices within the GitHub ecosystem to prevent future threats. In the recent past, there was a security breach affecting GitHub Action tj-actions/changed-files that exposed critical security vulnerabilities in software supply chains, emphasizing the risks associated with third-party dependencies in continuous integration/continuous delivery. 

Through GitHub Actions, a widely used automation platform, developers can optimize their workflows through reusable components, allowing them to save time and money. However, due to the compromise of tj-actions/changed-files—a tool that detects changes in files in pull requests and commits—over 23,000 repositories were accessed unauthorized, resulting in the theft of sensitive workflow secrets. A security researcher first noticed unusual activity related to the repository on March 14, 2025, which led to the discovery of the breach. 

A malicious payload has been injected into CI/CD runners in an attempt to extract CI/CD runner memory, which exposed critical environment variables and workflow secrets within logs, which were discovered to have been injected by the attackers. An exploit like this could result in unauthorized access to confidential credentials, thereby posing a significant security risk to the organization. Having been provided with a critical lead by security researcher Adnan Khan, it has been confirmed that the root cause of this compromise stems from another GitHub Action called reviewdog/action-setup, which an independent organization maintains. 

The investigation revealed that the tj-actions/changed-files action was compromised because it was dependent on the tj-actions/eslint-changed-files action, which was itself dependent on the reviewdog/action-setup action. In addition to the attack on the review dog organization, multiple activities were also affected within that organization, indicating that the attack was more widespread than that. Maintainers of TJ-actions and Review Dog quickly mitigated this incident by implementing security patches and reducing further risks. 

To counteract growing threats within software supply chains, continuous security monitoring, dependency validation, and rapid mitigation strategies must be implemented to protect continuous integration/continuous delivery pipelines from future attacks. Wiz, one of the leading security firms, recommended that developers evaluate their potential exposure by performing a GitHub query to determine if any references to reviewdog/action-setup@v1 were found in their repositories. 

As part of this process, it is important to determine if any of the projects might have been compromised by the recent supply chain compromise. It would be prudent to treat the detection of double-encoded base64 payloads within workflow logs as a confirmation of the leakage of sensitive information. If this happens, immediate remediation measures are required to prevent further security incidents. 

To reduce the risks associated with compromised actions, developers are advised to remove all references to these actions across branches, remove workflow logs that might contain exposed credentials, and rotate any potentially compromised secrets so that unauthorized access cannot occur. There is a need to take proactive security measures, such as pin GitHub Actions to specific commit hashes rather than version tags to reduce the probability that similar breaches will occur in the future. Furthermore, by utilizing GitHub's allow-listing feature, we can restrict unauthorized actions and enhance the security of our repositories. 

One must respond quickly to supply chain attacks, which may have far-reaching consequences as well as leak CI/CD secrets. Immediately following the breach, organizations must take steps to contain the breach, and they must develop long-term security strategies to protect themselves against future threats as well. The companies that are potentially impacted by this GitHub Actions supply chain attack should take immediate measures to protect their systems from further harm. To effectively counteract unauthorized access and further exploitation, all exposed secrets must be rotated. This is especially true for those secrets that were used between March 14 and March 15, 2025. 

Failure to replace compromised credentials could result in further exploitation. Further, security teams need to thoroughly review CI/CD workflows, paying close attention to unexpected outputs, particularly within the section on "changed files". There is a good chance that any anomalies may indicate an unauthorized modification or possible data leak. All workflow references should be updated to point to specific commit hashes rather than mutable tags so that they can be used to enhance security and mitigate the risk of a similar incident in the future. This will reduce the risk that attackers may inject malicious code into widely used GitHub Actions in the future. 

A robust security policy is also crucial for organizations. For this reason, organizations must utilize GitHub's allow-listing feature to restrict access to unauthorized actions, and they should conduct regular security audits of their third-party dependencies before integrating them into workflows. This kind of prevention measure can greatly reduce the chances of an attack on the supply chain or an unauthorized change in the source code. As a result of the recent breach, it has been highlighted how widely used automation tools are prone to vulnerabilities, which emphasizes the need to maintain continuous security monitoring and develop proactive defence strategies. 

Although some organizations, like Coinbase, successfully mitigated the impact of this incident, it serves as a reaffirmation that all organizations should continue strengthening their security postures and remain vigilant when it comes to evolving threats in the software industry. Recent information about a security breach with GitHub Actions confirms that the threats associated with supply chain attacks are continuing to grow in the modern software development industry. It has become increasingly important for organizations to enforce strong security frameworks for the sake of preventing cyber threats by implementing continuous monitoring mechanisms, thorough dependency audits, and enhanced access controls as cyber threats become more sophisticated. 

CI/CD pipelines need to be protected against unauthorized intrusions at all costs, and this incident highlights the urgency for proactive defense strategies to prevent this type of activity. Teams can mitigate vulnerabilities and ensure their workflows are protected by adopting secure coding best practices, enforcing strict authentication policies, and utilizing GitHub's security features, if they implement secure coding practices and enforce strict authentication policies. As software supply chain security has become a world-wide concern, maintaining vigilance and immediate response to incidents is crucial to ensuring operational integrity and resilience against evolving threats in an era when it has become paramount.
Read more »
Ransomware
Cyber Security Cybersecurity Hacking Medusa Ransomware

Authorities Warn Against Medusa Ransomware Surge

 

 
Federal agencies are urging individuals and organizations to stay vigilant against a rising ransomware threat that has affected hundreds of new victims in recent weeks. The FBI, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) have jointly issued an advisory detailing the tactics used by Medusa ransomware and how to mitigate its impact.

First identified in June 2021, Medusa is a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) variant that primarily targets critical infrastructure sectors, including healthcare, education, legal, insurance, technology, and manufacturing. Through the RaaS model, the ransomware's developers delegate attack execution to affiliates, who have collectively compromised over 300 victims in the past month alone.

Initially, Medusa operated as a closed ransomware variant, where the same group that developed the malware also carried out attacks. However, it has since evolved into an affiliate-driven model, with developers recruiting attackers from dark web forums and paying them between $100 to $1 million per job.

Cybercriminals behind Medusa employ two primary attack vectors:
  • Phishing campaigns – Fraudulent emails trick users into downloading malicious attachments or clicking harmful links.
  • Exploiting unpatched vulnerabilities – Attackers take advantage of outdated software to infiltrate company networks.

Once inside, they utilize various legitimate tools to expand their access:

  • Advanced IP Scanner and SoftPerfect Network Scanner – Used to detect exploitable network vulnerabilities.
  • PowerShell and Windows command prompt – Help compile lists of targeted network resources.
  • Remote access tools like AnyDesk, Atera, and Splashtop – Assist in lateral movement across the system.
  • PsExec – Enables execution of files and commands with system-level privileges.
To avoid detection, attackers often disable security tools using compromised or signed drivers. They also delete PowerShell history and leverage Certutil to conceal their activity.

Similar to other ransomware strains, Medusa follows a double-extortion strategy. Not only do attackers encrypt stolen data, but they also threaten to leak it publicly if the ransom is not paid. Victims typically have 48 hours to respond, after which they may be contacted via phone or email.

A Medusa data leak site displays ransom demands along with a countdown timer. If victims need more time, they can delay the data release by paying $10,000 in cryptocurrency per extra day. Meanwhile, attackers may attempt to sell the stolen data to third parties even before the timer expires.

Federal authorities recommend the following preventative measures to reduce the risk of Medusa attacks:
  • Patch vulnerabilities – Keep all operating systems, software, and firmware updated.
  • Network segmentation – Prevent attackers from moving across connected systems.
  • Traffic filtering – Restrict access to internal services from untrusted sources.
  • Disable unused ports – Close unnecessary entry points to minimize security risks.
  • Backup critical data – Store multiple copies of important files in an isolated location.
  • Enable multifactor authentication (MFA) – Secure all accounts, especially those used for webmail, VPNs, and critical systems.
  • Monitor network activity – Use security tools to detect unusual patterns and alert administrators to potential threats.
By implementing these strategies, organizations can significantly lower their chances of falling victim to Medusa ransomware and other evolving cyber threats.
Read more »
Zero-day Flaw
Malicious Files nation-state hackers Threat Landscape Vulnerabilities and Exploits Zero-day Flaw

Windows Shortcut Vulnerability Exploited by 11 State-Sponsored Outfits

 

Since 2017, at least 11 state-sponsored threat groups have actively exploited a Microsoft zero-day issue that allows for abuse of Windows shortcut files to steal data and commit cyber espionage against organisations across multiple industries. 

Threat analysts from Trend Micro's Trend Zero Day Initiative (ZDI) discovered roughly 1,000 malicious.lnk files that exploited the flaw, known as ZDI-CAN-25373, which allowed cyber criminals to execute concealed malicious commands on a victim's PC via customised shortcut files.

“By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can prepare a malicious .lnk file for delivery to a victim,” researchers at Trend Micro noted. “Upon examining the file using the Windows-provided user interface, the victim will not be able to tell that the file contains any malicious content.”

The malicious files delivered by cybercriminals include a variety of payloads, including the Lumma infostealer and the Remcos remote access Trojan (RAT), which expose organisations to data theft and cyber espionage. 

State-sponsored outfits from North Korea, Iran, Russia, and China, as well as non-state actors, are among those behind the flaw attacks, which have affected organisations in the government, financial, telecommunications, military, and energy sectors across North America, Europe, Asia, South America, and Australia. 

Additionally, 45% of attacks were carried out by North Korean players, with Iran, Russia, and China each accounting for approximately 18%. Some of the groups listed as attackers are Evil Corp, Kimsuky, Bitter, and Mustang Panda, among others.

According to Trend Micro, Microsoft has not fixed the flaw despite receiving a proof-of-concept exploit through Trend ZDI's bug bounty program. Trend Micro did not react to a follow-up request for comment on their flaw detection and submission timeline.

Microsoft's position remains that it will not be fixing the vulnerability described by Trend Micro at this time because it "does not meet the bar for immediate servicing under our severity classification guidelines," though the company "will consider addressing it in a future feature release," according to an email from a Microsoft spokesperson.

Meanwhile, Microsoft Defender can detect and block threat behaviour, as detailed by Trend Micro, and Microsoft's Windows Smart App Control prevents malicious files from being downloaded from the internet. Furthermore, Windows recognises shortcut (.lnk) files as potentially malicious file types, and the system will automatically display a warning if a user attempts to download one.
Read more »
Online Safety
Cyber Security Cyber websites CyberCrime CyberThreat ICE Online Safety

ICE Expands Online Surveillance With Tool Tracking 200+ Websites

 


To ensure the safety of citizens throughout the world, and to enforce immigration laws, the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have always relied heavily on social media monitoring as an essential component of their respective operations. As an integral part of the agency's “enhanced screening” protocols, which are applied to foreign nationals upon their arrival in the United States, such monitoring has been an integral part of the agency's programs for several years. 

In addition to enforcing the protocols at borders and international airports, even visitors who are visiting the country for a limited period are subject to them. As part of its extensive surveillance efforts, ICE has utilized a range of technological tools. These techniques include purchasing location information from third-party data brokers, accessing utility bill databases, and utilizing other information sources to track undocumented immigrants. 

In addition to gathering vast amounts of personal information, these methods enable the agency to conduct enforcement activities that are aimed at improving the quality of life of Americans. Recent developments have shown that ICE has adopted a new, advanced surveillance tool that is capable of continuously gathering, organizing, and analyzing information from various online platforms. As reported by Joseph Cox for 404 Media, this tool combines data from several social media services and websites to expand the capability of ICE in terms of digital surveillance.

In the course of implementing this technology, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is taking steps to improve its monitoring and data-gathering strategies in response to the threat that the agency is facing. The agency is preparing to expand its efforts to monitor and analyze online discourse as part of its digital surveillance efforts. These initiatives will be focused on individuals who are expressing negative opinions about the agency or making threats against its personnel. 

A recent request for information issued by ICE in November called for private sector companies that can improve the organization's monitoring capabilities to aid it in countering an increasing number of external threats, which are being spread through social media and other online platforms. As part of its 15-page statement outlining its objectives, the agency detailed the requirements for a specialized contractor to conduct extensive online monitoring as part of their monitoring efforts. 

In order to identify potential risks, it would be the responsibility of the selected entity to scan social media networks, publicly accessible online databases, the deep web, and the dark web. As part of ICE's efforts to pinpoint and assess potential threats, it has specified the need for advanced analytical tools such as geolocation tracking, psychological profiling, and facial recognition to assist in this process. These increased monitoring efforts have resulted in increased scrutiny of individuals who have consistently made negative statements about ICE or who have mentioned specific immigration enforcement personnel on social media. 

Through this initiative, the agency is showing its commitment to strengthening its security measures through enhanced digital surveillance and intelligence collection techniques. It was in November, just after Trump's electoral victory, when Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced multiple solicitations on federal procurement websites, seeking contractors for enhancing, upgrading, and expanding its technological capabilities so that it can better track, monitor, and monitor noncitizens. 

Trump's administration has been supporting the ICE agency despite its history of violating human rights, mistreating its detainees, and committing misconduct within its detention facilities and deportation operations. In his campaign, Trump promised that he would implement large-scale deportations, which he promptly carried out during his presidency. His administration took action within a couple of days after taking office by authorizing nationwide immigration enforcement operations, robbing ICE of restrictions on its activities in sensitive locations, including schools, hospitals, and places of worship. This policy shift enabled the department to take effective action against immigration violations everywhere. 

There was also the passage of the Laken Riley Act during the same time these measures were taking place, which gave ICE the authority to deport individuals convicted of minor offences, such as shoplifting, regardless of whether conviction had been obtained or not. As a result of bipartisan support, ten senators and 48 members of the House of Representatives voted in favour of this legislation, which has been criticized for undermining due process rights. As ICE is poised to expand its surveillance apparatus, policy changes are not the only factor driving it. 

Additionally, private contractors have financial interests that are influenced by these entities as they strive to maximize profits. These entities are motivated by profit and wish to broaden enforcement mechanisms, which in turn increases the number of people being monitored and detained. A growing anti-immigrant sentiment has sparked concern among advocacy organizations and civil society organizations about the protection of immigrant communities in the United States. 

A growing number of activists and civil society groups are now focusing on exposing and challenging the growing surveillance infrastructure, a system that has been built over the past decade, and which is being reinforced by an administration that has used incendiary rhetoric against immigrants and activists, calling them threats to the country. ICE’s Expanding Surveillance Network and Private Sector Involvement The growth of electronic monitoring within immigration enforcement has made BI Inc., an organization that has a $2.2 billion contract with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that is set to expire in July, one of the major beneficiaries of the expansion of electronic monitoring. 

The BI Inc., as the only provider of electronic monitoring devices for ICE, has a crucial role to play in implementing the agency’s surveillance programs as its exclusive provider of electronic monitoring devices. This company is owned and operated by a subsidiary of the GEO Group, the world's largest private prison corporation. They operate multiple immigration detention facilities that are contracted by the Department of Immigration and the Department of Homeland Security. Geo Group's involvement in political financing has also been heavily emphasized, with $3.4 million contributed to political campaigns in 2024 by Geo Group, of which $3.4 million went to the Make America Great Again super PAC. 

Last year, the company also spent $1.03 million on lobbying activities, directing a substantial amount ($340,000) in favour of policies that relate to immigration enforcement and alternatives to detention, a sector in which BI Inc. has long held a dominant position. Legal Challenges and Privacy Concerns Surrounding ISAP There have been several advocacy groups that are urging more transparency regarding ICE's Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP), which uses electronic surveillance rather than detention facilities to place immigrants under electronic surveillance. These groups include Just Futures Law, Mijente, and Community Justice Exchange. 

There have been some organizations that have sued ICE to obtain information regarding the type of data collected and the way it is used, but after examining the agency's response to these questions, they concluded in 2023 that the agency had not provided adequate assurances regarding the protection of data and privacy in ISAP. ICE’s Use of Facial Recognition Technology ICE has been using facial recognition software since 2020. 

They contracted Clearview AI, which is famous for scraping images from social networks and the internet without the consent of the individuals involved. By matching this data to names and cross-referencing it with law enforcement databases, the police can identify individuals suspected of crime. As a result of Clearview AI's practices being questioned in multiple jurisdictions, the EU has imposed a ban on its operations in the EU due to violations of the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR), which govern data collection and use. 

Numerous lawsuits have been filed against the company claiming that the company has engaged in unlawful surveillance practices in the United States. A $2.3 million contract with Clearview AI ended in September 2023, and it has not yet been decided whether or not the agency has renewed the contract or will continue to utilize the software in another manner. Moreover, Clearview AI has not only been in legal battles, but has also been actively lobbying against legislation that would regulate both its operation and the operation of data brokers as well. 

Growing Concerns Over ICE’s Surveillance Expansion With the increasing use of electronic monitoring and facial recognition technology by ICE, concerns remain regarding privacy violations, data security, and ethical implications that are associated with these technologies as they continue to expand their surveillance infrastructure. It is important to note that the agency relies on private companies with vested financial interests, which further emphasizes the complexity of immigration enforcement and civil liberties in a digital age.
Read more »
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)