Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Showing posts with label Ghost Tap. Show all posts

Experts Say ‘Ghost Tapping’ Payment Scams Are Uncommon, But Consumers Should Still Stay Alert

 










As contactless payment systems become increasingly common at stores, public events, and seasonal markets, cybersecurity and payment security experts are reminding consumers to remain aware of how digital transactions work and to regularly monitor their financial activity. The warning follows growing discussions around so-called “ghost tapping” scams, a term used to describe situations where a payment could allegedly be processed through a smartphone’s tap-to-pay feature without the owner intentionally authorizing the transaction.

Despite online concern surrounding the issue, consumer protection specialists say incidents involving “ghost tapping” remain highly uncommon. Erin McGovern, a consumer protection official who has been monitoring complaints linked to the scam, said her organization has received fewer than 10 reports connected to these cases so far. However, she cautioned that risks associated with payment fraud may become more noticeable during busy shopping periods such as holiday markets, craft fairs, and seasonal events where large numbers of people rely on mobile payment systems for convenience.

At these public events, many vendors use portable payment terminals that allow customers to quickly complete purchases using smartphones or digital wallets instead of physical cash or bank cards. McGovern explained that while the speed and convenience of tap-to-pay technology make shopping easier, consumers should still remain careful about confirming the exact amount being charged before approving any transaction. She noted that shoppers sometimes become distracted in crowded environments, making it easier to overlook suspicious activity or incorrect payment totals.

The discussion around “ghost tapping” has raised concerns online because many consumers are unfamiliar with the technical limitations of contactless payment systems. Security specialists explain that tap-to-pay technology operates through Near Field Communication, commonly known as NFC. This wireless communication technology allows devices such as smartphones, smartwatches, and payment terminals to exchange encrypted payment information when placed extremely close together.

According to payment security experts, NFC technology only functions across a very short range, typically four centimeters or less. Michael Jabbara, Senior Vice President and Head of Payment Ecosystem Risk and Control at Visa, explained that the required distance is approximately the size of a small paper clip. Because of this limitation, an individual attempting to secretly trigger a payment would need to move unusually close to another person’s phone or pocket.

Jabbara stated that most people would naturally notice if someone entered their personal space to that extent. For that reason, experts say it would be highly difficult for a scammer to perform an unauthorized tap-to-pay transaction without drawing attention. While researchers acknowledge that such activity may be technically possible under certain conditions, they emphasize that it would be extremely unusual for it to happen without the victim becoming aware of suspicious behavior.

Still, cybersecurity professionals say the conversation surrounding “ghost tapping” highlights a broader and more realistic concern: many consumers fail to regularly review their banking activity or payment notifications. According to Jabbara, fraudsters often depend on victims ignoring account activity until the end of the month or waiting several weeks before reviewing statements. This delay can allow unauthorized purchases to remain undetected long enough for scammers to continue exploiting stolen payment information.

Financial security experts recommend reviewing banking applications, credit card activity, and digital wallet transactions frequently instead of waiting until a dispute becomes necessary. Early detection of suspicious purchases significantly increases the chances of stopping additional fraudulent activity and recovering lost funds.

Consumer protection authorities also note that individuals who believe they were targeted by payment fraud can dispute unauthorized charges directly with their bank or credit card provider. In some cases, victims may also submit formal complaints to their local attorney general’s office or consumer protection agencies for further investigation.

However, specialists say prevention remains the most effective defense against digital payment scams. One of the strongest recommendations from payment security experts is enabling instant transaction alerts through banking and credit card applications. Many financial institutions already use automated fraud-detection systems that analyze unusual spending behavior and risk patterns before approving transactions. Even so, transaction alerts provide another important layer of protection by notifying users immediately whenever money is spent through their account.

These notifications can help consumers quickly identify purchases linked to unfamiliar merchant names, unexpected locations, or payment amounts they did not approve. Experts say immediate awareness often prevents fraud from escalating into larger financial losses.

Another important safety measure is always requesting a receipt after making a purchase. Receipts serve as proof of payment and can become important evidence if consumers later need to challenge suspicious charges with their bank or payment provider. McGovern warned that vendors refusing to provide receipts or claiming that their payment system is suddenly malfunctioning could represent a potential warning sign of fraudulent behavior.

Cybersecurity analysts additionally point out that modern digital wallet systems, including services such as Apple Pay and Google Pay, already contain multiple layers of security protection. These systems rely on technologies such as tokenization and encryption, which help prevent actual card numbers from being directly exposed during transactions. Instead of transmitting sensitive banking details, digital wallets generate encrypted payment tokens designed to reduce the likelihood of financial data theft.

Although security protections built into modern payment platforms have substantially reduced many traditional forms of card fraud, experts caution that scammers continuously adapt their tactics as digital payment technology evolves. For that reason, cybersecurity professionals stress that awareness, regular account monitoring, transaction alerts, and cautious payment habits remain essential safeguards for consumers using contactless payment systems.

New Ghost Tap Assault Exploits NFC Mobile Payments to Steal Funds

 

The attackers are increasingly relying on a novel approach that employs near-field communication (NFC) to pay out victims' funds at scale. ThreatFabric's Ghost Tap technology enables fraudsters to cash out money from stolen credit cards related to mobile payment services such as Google Pay or Apple Pay while relaying NFC traffic. 

"Criminals can now misuse Google Pay and Apple Pay to transmit your tap-to-pay information globally within seconds," the Dutch security company stated. "This means that even without your physical card or phone, they can make payments from your account anywhere in the world.”

These attacks usually include deceiving victims into downloading malware for mobile banking, which subsequently uses an overlay attack or a keylogger to steal their banking credentials and one-time passwords. As an alternative, it can include a voice phishing feature.

Once the threat actors get the card information, they proceed to link the card to Apple Pay or Google Pay. However, the tap-to-pay information is sent to a mule, who is in charge of making fraudulent transactions at a business, in an effort to prevent the issuer from blocking the cards. A reliable research tool called NFCGate, which has the ability to record, examine, and alter NFC traffic, is used to achieve this. Using a server, NFC traffic can also be transferred between two devices. 

Researchers from TU Darmstadt's Secure Mobile Networking Lab stated that one device functions as a reader reading an NFC tag, while the other device emulates an NFC tag using the Host Card Emulation (HCE).

The most recent development is the first instance of NFCGate being misused to relay data, even though ESET previously noted that bad actors have previously utilised the technology to transfer NFC information from victims' devices to the attacker using NGate malware back in August 2024. 

"Cybercriminals can establish a relay between a device with stolen card and PoS [point-of-sale] terminal at a retailer, staying anonymous and performing cash-outs on a larger scale," ThreatFabric explained. "The cybercriminal with the stolen card can be far away from the location (even different country) where the card will be used as well as use the same card in multiple locations within a short period of time.” 

The approach has further benefits in that it can be employed to purchase gift cards at offline businesses without the fraudsters being physically present. Even worse, it can be utilised to expand the fraudulent operation by recruiting the assistance of multiple mules in different locations over a short period of time. 

Further complicating the detection of Ghost Tap assaults is the fact that the transactions appear as if they are originating from the same device, hence circumventing anti-fraud measures. It can be more difficult to determine their precise location and the fact that the associated card was not used to complete the transaction at the PoS terminal if the device is in flight mode.