Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Showing posts with label cryptocurrency security. Show all posts

Astaroth Malware Adopts GitHub Infrastructure to Target Crypto Investors

 


A new attack is now underway involving the notorious Astaroth banking Trojan, a banking Trojan which is used to steal cryptocurrency credentials, and cybersecurity researchers at McAfee have discovered that this Trojan exploited the GitHub platform for distribution. This is a worrying revelation that emphasises the increasing sophistication of cybercrime. 

Known for its stealthy and persistent nature, the malware has evolved to make use of GitHub repositories as backup command-and-control centres whenever its primary servers are taken down, thus enabling it to continue operating even under takedown attempts on its primary servers.

A McAfee study found that the campaign is mostly spread through deceptive emails that lure unsuspecting recipients into downloading malicious Windows shortcuts (.lnk) files as a result of these emails. It is believed that the Astaroth malware is silently installed by the malicious executable files. Once these files are executed, they will deeply enslave the victim's system, as soon as they are executed. 

As the Trojan runs quietly in the background, it employs advanced keylogging techniques so that it can steal banking and cryptocurrency credentials, transmitting the stolen information to the attackers' remote infrastructure via the Ngrok reverse proxy. 

In this sophisticated approach, cybercriminals are increasingly utilising legitimate platforms such as GitHub to conceal their tracks, maintain persistence, and extend their reach in the digital finance ecosystem, thereby illustrating how hackers are using legitimate platforms to maintain persistence, conceal their tracks, and expand their reach. 

McAfee Threat Research's investigation revealed that this campaign represents a pivotal shift in the Astaroth Trojan's operational framework, signalling that malware has entered a new age when it comes to adaptability and resilience. A major improvement over its earlier versions is the fact that now the latest variant does not rely on traditional command-and-control (C2) servers to handle its operations. 

As a result, GitHub is using its trusted and legitimate infrastructure to host crucial malware configuration files, allowing it to keep operating even when law enforcement or cybersecurity experts take down its primary servers to maintain uninterrupted activity. Using this strategic transition, Astaroth will be able to dynamically restore its functionality as it draws updates directly from GitHub repositories. 

These attackers have inserted encrypted configuration data into seemingly harmless images uploaded to these repositories that appear harmless by using advanced steganography techniques. A hidden portion of these images contains crucial operational instructions, which the malware retrieves and updates every two hours to update its parameters and evade detection. 

Astaroth exploits GitHub in this way to turn a mainstream development platform into a covert, self-sustaining control system, one that is much more elusive and difficult to counter than traditional C2 systems, making it much easier to use. In their research, researchers identified a highly deceptive infection strategy used by the Astaroth Trojan, involving phishing emails that are constructed in such a way that they seem both genuine and convincing.

As a result of the messages, recipients are enticed to download a Windows shortcut (.lnk) file that, when executed, discreetly installs malware on the host computer. A silent data theft program by Astaroth, which operates quietly behind the scenes, harvests sensitive banking and cryptocurrency credentials from unsuspecting victims by utilising keylogging techniques. 

For the stolen data to reach the attackers, an intermediary channel between the infected device and the command infrastructure is established by the Ngrok reverse proxy, which acts as a proxy between the attackers and the infected device. There is one distinctive aspect of this particular campaign: its adaptability to maintain operational continuity by using GitHub repositories instead of hosting malicious payloads directly. 

As opposed to hosting malicious payloads directly, the attackers use GitHub to store configuration files that direct infected bots to active servers when law enforcement or cybersecurity experts dismantle primary command-and-control systems. According to Abhishek Karnik, McAfee's Director of Threat Research and Response, GitHub's role in the attack chain can be attributed to the fact that it hosts these configuration files, which, in turn, redirect the malware to its active control points, thus ensuring sustained operation despite efforts to remove it. 

A recent Astaroth campaign does not represent the first time the organisation has targeted Brazilian users, a region in which it has repeatedly carried out malicious activities. According to both Google and Trend Micro, similar clusters of activity were detected in 2024, coded PINEAPPLE and Water Makara, which spread the same Trojan through deceptive phishing campaigns. 

As in previous waves, the latest wave of infection follows a comparable infection chain, starting with a convincing phishing email with the DocuSign theme that tricks the recipient into downloading a compressed Windows shortcut (.lnk). When this file is downloaded and opened, it initiates an Astaroth installation process on the compromised system. 

Under the surface of the LNK file, a malicious script is hidden that obfuscates JavaScript, allowing it to retrieve further malicious scripts from an external source. By executing the AutoIt script, which downloads several components from randomly selected hard-coded domains, as well as an AutoIt script, further payloads are executed. 

It is believed that the Astaroth malware will be decrypted and injected into a newly created RegSvc.exe process as a result of this chain of execution, which culminates with the loading of a Delphi-based dynamic link library (DLL). Using the Delphi programming language, Astaroth constantly monitors browser activity, checks for open banking or cryptocurrency websites periodically, and also captures login credentials through keylogging. 

A reverse proxy, such as the Ngrok reverse proxy, facilitates the filtering of stolen credentials, ensuring that sensitive financial information is safely transmitted to the attackers and that immediate detection is avoided. In addition to having far-reaching implications for the cryptocurrency market and the broader digital economy, Astaroth's persistent threat carries far-reaching repercussions as well. Initially, this situation raised the vigilance of users and raised concerns about the reliability of digital asset security, which has increased the level of anxiety in the market.

Financial losses among affected individuals have intensified market anxiety, resulting in a dwindling of confidence among new participants, and thereby slowing adoption rates in the emerging digital finance space. Those kinds of incidents are expected to encourage the development of more stringent cybersecurity protocols on a long-term basis, resulting in exchanges, wallet providers, and blockchain-based businesses investing heavily in proactive defence mechanisms over the long run. 

In general, the market sentiment has remained cautious, as investors are wary of recurring attacks that threaten the perceived safety of cryptocurrencies. In addition to identifying the latest Astaroth campaign, McAfee's Advanced Threat Research team stepped in to report the malicious GitHub repositories that hosted its configuration promptly, as they played a crucial role in uncovering it. 

The collaborative efforts they made resulted in the removal of the repositories and the interruption of the malware's activities for a short period of time. As Director of Threat Research and Response at McAfee, Abhishek Karnik emphasised the widespread nature of the Trojan, particularly in Brazil, but acknowledged that it is still impossible to estimate how much money was stolen, especially in this country.

To reduce exposure, users should be vigilant, avoid opening unsolicited attachments, maintain updated security software, and use two-factor authentication to minimise vulnerability. It should be noted that the resurgence of Astaroth has highlighted a growing class of cyber threats aimed at the rapidly expanding Web3 ecosystem as a whole. 

According to industry experts, the industry's resilience will become increasingly dependent upon robust safeguards such as smart contract audits, decentralised identity frameworks, and cross-industry intelligence sharing as decentralised finance and blockchain applications mature and mature. In their opinion, improving security is a vital component of preventing breaches of data, but it is also essential to restore and sustain user trust. 

While regulators are still refining compliance standards for the digital asset sector, developers, organisations, and users need to work together to create a safe and sustainable crypto environment that is secure. In light of the Astaroth campaign, it is clear that cybercriminals are becoming not only more innovative but they are also more strategic when it comes to exploiting trusted digital ecosystems. 

The line between legitimate and malicious online activity is becoming increasingly blurred. Therefore, both individuals and organisations must become more aware of proactive defences and digital hygiene. As such, evolving threats become more prevalent, organisations must enhance resilience against them by strengthening incident response frameworks, integrating artificial intelligence for real-time threat detection, and investing in zero-trust security models. 

A cryptocurrency user's continuous education is more important than ever, such as recognising red flags for phishing, verifying email authenticity, and securing wallets with multi-factor authentication and hardware-based protection. Furthermore, it will be crucial for cybersecurity researchers to collaborate with technology platforms, regulatory authorities, and other organisations to eliminate the infrastructure that makes these attacks possible.

Ultimately, the fight against threats such as Astaroth transcends immediate containment; it represents an ongoing commitment to bolster digital trust, which is vital to the success of these attacks. In the process of embedding cybersecurity awareness into every layer of the Web3 ecosystem, the industry can transform every attempt at an attack into a catalyst for stronger, more adaptive security standards, which will enable businesses to remain competitive and secure.

Lazarus Group Suspected in $11M Crypto Heist Targeting Taiwan’s BitoPro Exchange

 

Taiwanese cryptocurrency platform BitoPro has blamed North Korea’s Lazarus Group for a cyberattack that resulted in $11 million in stolen digital assets. The breach occurred on May 8, 2025, during an upgrade to the exchange’s hot wallet system. 

According to BitoPro, the tactics and methods used by the hackers closely resemble those seen in other global incidents tied to the Lazarus Group, including high-profile thefts via SWIFT banking systems and other major crypto platforms. BitoPro serves a primarily Taiwanese customer base, offering fiat transactions in TWD alongside various cryptocurrencies. 

The exchange currently supports over 800,000 users and processes approximately $30 million in daily trades. The attack exploited vulnerabilities during a system update, enabling the unauthorized withdrawal of funds from a legacy hot wallet spread across several blockchain networks, including Ethereum, Tron, Solana, and Polygon. The stolen cryptocurrency was then quickly laundered through decentralized exchanges and mixers such as Tornado Cash, Wasabi Wallet, and ThorChain, making recovery and tracing more difficult. 

Despite the attack taking place in early May, BitoPro only publicly acknowledged the breach on June 2. At that time, the exchange assured users that daily operations remained unaffected and that the compromised hot wallet had been replenished from its reserve funds. Following a thorough investigation, the exchange confirmed that no internal staff were involved. 

However, the attackers used social engineering tactics to infect a cloud administrator’s device with malware. This allowed them to steal AWS session tokens, bypass multi-factor authentication, and gain unauthorized access to BitoPro’s cloud infrastructure. From there, they were able to insert scripts directly into the hot wallet system and carry out the theft while mimicking legitimate activity to avoid early detection. 

After discovering the breach, BitoPro deactivated the affected wallet system and rotated its cryptographic keys, though the damage had already been done. The company reported the incident to authorities and brought in a third-party cybersecurity firm to conduct an independent review, which concluded on June 11. 

The Lazarus Group has a long history of targeting cryptocurrency and decentralized finance platforms. This attack on BitoPro adds to their growing list of cyber heists, including the recent $1.5 billion digital asset theft from the Bybit exchange.

Sanctioned Russian Crypto Exchange Garantex Allegedly Rebrands as Grinex

 

International efforts to dismantle illicit financial networks are facing new challenges, as the recently sanctioned Russian cryptocurrency exchange Garantex appears to have rebranded and resumed operations under a new name—Grinex. Reports from blockchain analytics firm Global Ledger suggest that Grinex may be a direct successor to Garantex, which was shut down earlier this month in a joint operation by law enforcement agencies from the U.S., Germany, and Finland. 

Despite the crackdown, Global Ledger researchers have identified on-chain movements linking the two exchanges, including the transfer of Garantex’s holdings in a ruble-backed stablecoin, A7A5, to wallets controlled by Grinex. Off-chain clues further support the connection, such as the sudden surge in trading volume—Grinex reportedly handled over $40 million in transactions within two weeks of its launch. According to Lex Fisun, CEO of Global Ledger, social media activity also suggests a direct relationship between the platforms.

In a Telegram post, Sergey Mendeleev, a known figure associated with Garantex, downplayed the similarities between the two exchanges while making light of the situation. Meanwhile, reports indicate that former Garantex users have been transferring funds at the exchange’s physical offices in Europe and the Middle East, strengthening claims that Grinex is simply a rebranded version of the defunct platform. While leading blockchain analytics firms such as Chainalysis and TRM Labs have yet to verify these findings, Andrew Fierman, Head of National Security Intelligence at Chainalysis, acknowledged that early indicators point to a connection between Garantex and Grinex. 

However, a full assessment of Grinex’s infrastructure is still underway. If Grinex is indeed a rebranded Garantex, it would not be the first time a sanctioned exchange has attempted to evade regulatory scrutiny through rebranding. Similar cases have been observed in the past—BTC-E, a Russian exchange taken down by U.S. authorities in 2017, later reemerged as WEX, only to collapse due to internal conflicts. Likewise, Suex, another Russian exchange sanctioned for facilitating illicit transactions, resurfaced as Chatex before facing renewed enforcement actions. 

The reappearance of Garantex in another form underscores the persistent difficulties regulators face in enforcing financial sanctions. Despite the seizure of its servers and domain, the exchange’s infrastructure appears to have been quickly reestablished under a new identity. Experts warn that non-compliant exchanges operating in high-risk regions will continue to find ways to circumvent restrictions. Before its takedown, Garantex had been identified as a hub for money laundering and illicit financial transactions. 

The U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned the exchange in 2022, citing its involvement in facilitating payments for ransomware groups such as Black Basta and Conti, as well as its ties to darknet marketplaces like Hydra. Court documents also revealed that Garantex provided financial services to North Korea’s Lazarus Group, a state-backed hacking organization responsible for some of the largest cryptocurrency heists in history, including the $1.4 billion Bybit hack.

Additionally, Russian oligarchs reportedly used the platform to bypass economic sanctions imposed after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Two individuals linked to Garantex’s operations, Lithuanian national and Russian resident Aleksej Besciokov and Russian citizen Aleksandr Mira Serda, have been charged with conspiracy to commit money laundering. Besciokov was arrested in India earlier this month while on vacation with his family and is expected to be extradited to the U.S. to face trial. 

While authorities work to contain illicit financial activity in the crypto space, the rapid emergence of Grinex serves as a reminder of how easily such operations can adapt and reappear under new identities. Analysts warn that other high-risk exchanges in Russia, such as ABCEX and Keine-Exchange, are poised to take advantage of regulatory loopholes and fill the void left by Garantex’s shutdown.

Cybercriminals Steal $112 Million Worth of Ripple's XRP Cryptocurrency

 

On Tuesday, approximately $112 million worth of the XRP cryptocurrency, which is centered around Ripple, was pilfered by hackers from a crypto wallet, as revealed by Ripple's co-founder and executive chairman, Chris Larsen.

Larsen disclosed on Wednesday that the stolen cryptocurrency belonged to him. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Larsen mentioned that unauthorized access occurred in some of his personal XRP accounts, distinct from Ripple. He assured that the problem was swiftly identified, and exchanges were notified to freeze the affected addresses. Law enforcement has also been engaged in the matter.

The announcement came less than an hour after crypto security researcher ZachXBT reported the hack on X. According to ZachXBT, the pilfered XRP funds had already been laundered through various crypto exchanges like Binance and Kraken. Binance acknowledged the incident, stating that they are actively supporting the investigation, and Kraken emphasized their proactive review to prevent their platform from being misused.

However, there is ambiguity regarding the ownership of the hacked wallet, whether it is linked to Ripple or not. XRPScan's on-chain data revealed that the compromised wallet was labeled "Ripple (50)" and was activated by another wallet called "~FundingWallet1" on November 5, 2018. Larsen's account activated ~FundingWallet1 on February 6, 2013, shortly after his own account, ~chrislarsen, was created.

When approached for comment, Ripple's spokesperson referred to Larsen's post and clarified that Ripple itself was not impacted. Ripple, established in 2012, aspires to be a payments and enterprise infrastructure provider, consisting of a network, protocol, and decentralized public ledger known as XRP Ledger. The value of XRP, the network's token, dropped by approximately 4% on the day of the hack.

In response to the incident, some XRP holders are urging the co-founders to disclose their crypto wallets and XRP holdings to enhance transparency. Meanwhile, others, including Thinking Crypto podcast host Tony Edward, are urging Larsen to distance himself from Ripple.

This cyber attack stands out as the most significant cryptocurrency theft in 2024 and ranks as the twentieth largest in recorded history, based on data compiled by Rekt, a website monitoring web3 and crypto breaches. In the previous year, hackers targeted approximately $2 billion in cryptocurrency, as reported by crypto security firms specializing in tracking such incidents.