Search This Blog
Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Load More
Trendy Right Now

Popular Posts

Showing posts with label FBI. Show all posts
WiFi
Credential stealing fake network FBI Hotel Wi-Fi Attacks https MFA Phishing travel VPN WiFi

Think Hotel Wi-Fi Is Safe? Hackers Have Several Ways to Prove You Wrong

 



For many travelers, connecting to hotel Wi-Fi is one of the first things they do after checking in. But while some guests use the network for banking and work, others avoid sensitive activity unless they are connected through a VPN.

So, how safe is hotel Wi-Fi?

Cybersecurity experts say the answer is more nuanced than simply calling public Wi-Fi dangerous. Modern encryption has reduced many of the risks associated with public networks, but hotel Wi-Fi can still expose travelers to rogue networks, phishing attacks, poorly configured infrastructure and vulnerable devices.

In many cases, the biggest risk may not be the network itself, but how the user connects to and behaves on it.


The first risk can come from a fake network

Security analyst Udaya Vemuri advises travelers to be cautious about joining a network simply because its name appears to belong to the hotel.

Attackers can create fake Wi-Fi networks with names almost identical to legitimate hotel networks. The technique, known as an "evil twin" attack, can trick guests into connecting to an attacker-controlled access point.

The FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center warned about this threat in a 2020 advisory, noting that criminals can create networks resembling legitimate hotel Wi-Fi and potentially monitor activity or redirect victims to fraudulent login pages. The agency also warned that hotel guests have limited control over the security of the infrastructure they are using, which may prioritize convenience over stronger security practices.

Travelers should therefore confirm the exact Wi-Fi name with hotel staff before connecting rather than selecting the network that merely looks familiar.


Simply sharing a network does not mean you are compromised

Dahvid Schloss, chief operating officer of cybersecurity firm Suzu Labs and a former government hacker who has security-tested hotel chains, takes a less alarmist view.

Schloss compares hotel Wi-Fi with other public networks, such as those in coffee shops. In his assessment, the likelihood of being attacked simply because another malicious user is connected to the same network is low.

That distinction matters because the common image of hackers automatically reading passwords from public Wi-Fi is outdated.

The Federal Trade Commission says most websites now use encryption, meaning information sent between a device and a legitimate website is generally protected even when the underlying network is public. HTTPS can therefore provide substantial protection against traffic interception.

However, HTTPS does not prove that a website is legitimate. Attackers can create encrypted fraudulent websites and use phishing or redirection to persuade victims to submit credentials.

This means a traveler can still be exposed even when the connection itself appears encrypted.


Fake hotel portals can steal credentials

Hotels commonly use captive portals that redirect guests to a webpage after they connect to Wi-Fi. These pages may request a room number, surname, email address or access code.

Because travelers expect this process, attackers can imitate it.

A rogue network may display a fake hotel login page or redirect users to a fraudulent Microsoft 365, email or banking page. In such cases, the attacker does not necessarily need to break encryption. The victim may simply be tricked into providing the information.

This makes phishing and social engineering an important part of the hotel Wi-Fi threat.


Network security is not a perfect guarantee

Recent research also shows why travelers should not assume that network-level protections make public Wi-Fi completely secure.

Researchers at the University of California, Riverside reported in February 2026 that weaknesses in Wi-Fi client isolation can, under certain conditions, allow attackers to bypass protections designed to prevent devices on the same network from interacting with one another.

Their AirSnitch research demonstrated techniques that could potentially allow an attacker to intercept or manipulate traffic despite client isolation.

The findings do not mean every hotel network is vulnerable, but they reinforce an important point: users should not rely entirely on the security mechanisms implemented by a public network.


Your device can be the weakest link

Both experts place considerable emphasis on user behavior.

Schloss argues that laptops can be particularly vulnerable to poor security habits because they are frequently used to download files, install software and access corporate systems. Smartphones are not immune, but their operating systems often impose stronger application restrictions.

The FBI recommends updating operating systems and applications before travel, keeping security software current, backing up important data, disabling Bluetooth when unnecessary and preventing devices from automatically reconnecting to public networks.

Automatic reconnection is particularly important because a device may join a previously saved network without the user consciously verifying that it is legitimate.

Browser warnings should also never be ignored. A certificate warning, unexpected redirect or request to install software can indicate that something is wrong with the connection or destination.


Use cellular data for sensitive activity

Vemuri takes a more cautious approach when handling sensitive information. For banking, work systems and other private activity, he uses a mobile hotspot instead of hotel Wi-Fi. When hotel Wi-Fi is unavoidable, he keeps devices updated, enables multifactor authentication and avoids sensitive tasks.

The FBI similarly recommends using a phone's hotspot instead of hotel Wi-Fi when possible, particularly for sensitive activity and telework.

A cellular hotspot is not completely immune to cyber threats, but it removes the user from the hotel's shared wireless environment and reduces exposure to risks associated with public Wi-Fi.


A VPN and MFA can add protection

For travelers who need to use hotel Wi-Fi, a reputable VPN can provide another layer of security by encrypting traffic between the device and the VPN provider. The FBI recommends reputable VPNs for telework over hotel Wi-Fi.

A VPN is not a substitute for other security measures, however. It cannot prevent phishing, malware downloads or users from voluntarily entering credentials into fraudulent websites.

Multifactor authentication can limit the damage if a password is compromised. The FBI recommends MFA for sensitive accounts and advises users to enable login notifications so suspicious activity can be detected quickly.

Travelers should configure MFA before leaving home rather than waiting until they are already on the road.


What travelers should do

Before connecting to hotel Wi-Fi, users should:

  1. Confirm the legitimate network name with hotel staff.
  2. Update their operating system, browser and applications.
  3. Disable automatic connection to public networks.
  4. Enable MFA and account security alerts.
  5. Use a cellular hotspot for banking and highly sensitive activity where possible.
  6. Use a reputable VPN for sensitive work when hotel Wi-Fi is unavoidable.
  7. Verify the website address and HTTPS before entering credentials.
  8. Avoid unfamiliar downloads or software updates prompted by Wi-Fi portals.
  9. Disable Bluetooth when it is not needed.
  10. Never bypass browser security warnings.


So, is hotel Wi-Fi safe?

Hotel Wi-Fi is not automatically dangerous, but it should not be treated as a trusted network either.

Simply sharing a network with an attacker does not mean a modern device will automatically be compromised, particularly when legitimate services use encryption. At the same time, rogue access points, fake captive portals, phishing, vulnerable devices and weaknesses in network isolation can create opportunities for attackers.

For routine browsing, an updated device using legitimate HTTPS websites can be reasonably protected. For banking, corporate systems and other highly sensitive activity, using a cellular hotspot remains the more cautious option.

The practical rule for travelers is simple: do not panic about hotel Wi-Fi, but do not trust it blindly either. Verify the network, secure your devices and accounts, and keep sensitive activity off shared networks whenever possible.

Read more »
RaaS
ALPHV BlackCat Ransomware Cyber Attacks DigitalMint FBI RaaS

Former DigitalMint negotiator sentenced to 70 months for conspiring with BlackCat ransomware affiliates

 



A former ransomware negotiator who was hired to help organizations respond to cyber extortion incidents has been sentenced to 70 months in federal prison after admitting he secretly worked with BlackCat ransomware affiliates, using confidential client information to increase ransom payments while participating in additional ransomware attacks.

The U.S. Department of Justice said Angelo Martino, 41, abused his position at incident response firm DigitalMint by sharing privileged information obtained during ransomware negotiations with BlackCat, also tracked as ALPHV. Prosecutors said the information allowed the ransomware group to negotiate from a stronger position while victims remained unaware that details intended to protect them had been disclosed to the attackers.

As part of his role, Martino managed active ransomware cases for organizations seeking assistance after cyberattacks. His work gave him access to confidential information that companies typically share only with trusted negotiators, including cyber insurance policy limits, internal assessments of how much they were prepared to pay, and negotiation strategies developed during incident response.

According to court documents, Martino began providing that information to BlackCat operators in April 2023. Prosecutors said he communicated with the group through multiple channels connected to BlackCat's extortion platform. While one conversation took place through the standard negotiation interface used during ransomware incidents, he also relied on an intermediary chat feature within the group's panel and the encrypted messaging application Tox to exchange information directly with the attackers outside the victims' view.

Federal prosecutors said those private communications were intended to help BlackCat maximize ransom demands. In exchange for sharing confidential information, including insurance coverage limits and the negotiating positions of victim organizations, Martino received a portion of the cryptocurrency paid by ransomware victims.

The Justice Department said five organizations whose cases were handled by Martino collectively paid more than $75 million to BlackCat affiliates between April and September 2023. Prosecutors argued that access to confidential negotiation data enabled the attackers to demand higher payments than they otherwise might have secured. The affected organizations operated in the financial services, healthcare, retail, hospitality, and nonprofit sectors, with several experiencing operational disruption alongside the financial losses associated with the attacks.

Investigators also determined that Martino later became an active participant in BlackCat's ransomware operation. In May 2023, he obtained affiliate access to the ransomware-as-a-service platform, permissions generally granted to trusted partners responsible for compromising victim networks and deploying the malware.

Court filings state that Martino shared those affiliate credentials with Kevin Martin and Ryan Goldberg, both cybersecurity professionals. The three men subsequently carried out additional ransomware attacks and agreed to divide ransom proceeds among themselves while paying 20% of each payment to BlackCat's administrators in exchange for continued access to the group's malware and extortion infrastructure.

One attack targeted a medical device manufacturer that ultimately paid approximately $1.2 million in ransom. Other organizations refused to pay but still incurred costs associated with business interruption, system recovery, and incident response following the attacks.

Prosecutors said Martino received millions of dollars in cryptocurrency through the conspiracy. Federal investigators recovered and seized more than $10 million in assets connected to the case, although authorities said some proceeds had already been used to purchase residential properties, vehicles, and a boat. As part of his sentence, Martino must forfeit assets linked to the criminal activity and pay 10% of his future income following his release from prison.

Before sentencing, Martino requested a reduced 24-month prison term, citing his cooperation with investigators during the prosecution of his co-conspirators. Martin and Goldberg were each sentenced to four years in prison earlier this year after pleading guilty for their involvement in the BlackCat attacks.

"Angelo Martino sold out the very victims he was hired to represent, handing their confidential negotiating positions to BlackCat actors to drive up ransoms and enrich himself," FBI Cyber Division Assistant Director Brett Leatherman said following the sentencing.

BlackCat operates as a ransomware-as-a-service platform, providing malware and extortion infrastructure to affiliates that compromise organizations and share a percentage of ransom payments with the group's administrators. The FBI has linked the operation to more than 1,000 victims and at least $300 million in ransom payments through September 2023. Although law enforcement disrupted parts of the group's infrastructure and previously released a decryptor for some victims, affiliates continued launching attacks after those actions.

DigitalMint said it was unaware of Martino's conduct until it was contacted by the Department of Justice and described itself as another victim of the scheme. The company said the employees involved were terminated immediately after the allegations came to light and that it fully cooperated with investigators throughout the criminal investigation.

The company also said Martino deliberately bypassed internal safeguards by communicating with threat actors through unauthorized channels that were not visible within its monitoring systems. According to DigitalMint, its security controls aligned with industry practices, but the unauthorized communications were intentionally concealed from the company's oversight mechanisms.

Read more »
signal
Backup CISA Cyber Security FBI Phishing signal

FBI Warns Russian-Linked Hackers Have Shifted Signal Phishing Campaign to Steal Backup Recovery Keys

 


The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) have issued an updated public service announcement warning that Russian intelligence-linked threat actors have expanded an ongoing phishing campaign targeting Signal users. Rather than attempting to intercept authentication codes alone, the attackers are now seeking victims' Signal Backup Recovery Keys, enabling them to restore encrypted cloud backups and gain access to historical conversations.

The latest advisory builds on an alert released in March 2026, when the agencies disclosed that Russian-backed operators were targeting users of commercial messaging applications, particularly Signal, through carefully crafted phishing campaigns. Those earlier attacks focused on compromising accounts by deceiving users into handing over verification codes, account PINs, or linking unauthorized devices to their Signal accounts, instead of defeating the application's end-to-end encryption.

According to the FBI, the threat actors have refined their social engineering techniques by impersonating automated Signal support accounts and introducing a new objective: convincing users to disclose the recovery keys that protect their encrypted backups.

The agencies said the campaign continues to concentrate on individuals considered to be of intelligence value, including current and former U.S. government officials, government personnel from allied nations, military members, political figures, journalists, and officials located in Ukraine.

The activity has been attributed to Russian Intelligence Services (RIS), including officers associated with Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) Border Guards and additional actors operating on behalf of the Russian military. Security researchers publicly track the activity under the designations UNC5792 and UNC4221.

Phishing campaign evolves beyond account hijacking

The updated advisory describes a notable change in the attackers' methods. Earlier phishing attempts largely sought one-time verification codes, Signal PINs, or persuaded victims to connect attacker-controlled devices to their accounts. The current campaign instead attempts to obtain the cryptographic recovery key used by Signal's Secure Backups feature.

To begin the attack, the operators pose as Signal's support team and distribute fraudulent messages claiming the messaging platform is introducing mandatory two-factor verification following an alleged increase in attacks carried out by hackers from Iran and post-Soviet countries. The messages falsely state that the security changes require users to configure Signal Backups in order to avoid losing conversations and media files.

Victims are instructed to navigate through the application's backup settings, enable Secure Backups, reveal the Backup Recovery Key, copy it to the clipboard, and complete what appears to be a legitimate setup process.

Signal's Secure Backups feature allows users to store encrypted copies of conversations on the company's cloud infrastructure. Those backups remain protected through end-to-end encryption, with the Backup Recovery Key serving as the only credential capable of decrypting and restoring the archived data. Because Signal does not retain this key, anyone who obtains it can restore the encrypted backup onto another device.

After victims complete the initial steps, the attackers send a second phishing message while continuing to impersonate Signal support. This follow-up communication claims the user's account is experiencing a synchronization problem and warns that stored messages and media could be permanently lost unless immediate action is taken.

The fraudulent notification instructs users to revisit the backup settings, copy the Backup Recovery Key once again, and paste it directly into the conversation under the pretense of preventing data loss.

If victims comply, the attackers obtain the recovery key and use it to restore the encrypted backup on devices under their control. This grants access to previously archived communications, including private conversations and group chats.

The FBI emphasized that these attacks do not compromise Signal's encryption itself. Instead, they rely entirely on social engineering techniques that manipulate users into voluntarily surrendering the credentials needed to decrypt their own backups.

Compromised recovery keys remain a risk even after creating a new account

The updated advisory also highlights a recovery scenario that affected users may easily overlook.

According to the FBI, creating a new Signal account with the same phone number does not invalidate a Backup Recovery Key that has already been stolen. If attackers previously acquired the key, they may still be able to access any encrypted backups downloaded before the compromise was discovered.

To prevent future backup restorations using a compromised credential, users should generate a new Backup Recovery Key through Signal's backup settings. Creating a replacement key invalidates the previous one for subsequent backup downloads. However, the agencies cautioned that this action cannot revoke access to backups that attackers have already restored using the stolen key.

Agencies urge users to remain cautious of unsolicited support messages

The FBI and CISA reminded users that legitimate messaging platform support teams communicate only through official company email channels. They do not request verification codes through the application itself, nor do they send unsolicited messages instructing users to verify accounts, restore backups, or disclose recovery credentials.

Anyone who believes they may have interacted with the phishing campaign is encouraged to report the incident to the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), a local FBI field office, or CISA.

The advisory accentuates the fact that well-designed encryption remains effective only when the credentials protecting it remain under the user's control. Rather than attempting to break modern cryptography, state-sponsored threat actors are increasingly directing their efforts toward manipulating trusted users into revealing the keys that unlock their own protected data.

Read more »
sim swap
CBZC cryptocurrency Cyber Crime FBI Poland sim swap

Poland arrests four suspects in international SIM-swapping operation linked to multimillion-dollar cryptocurrency thefts

 



Polish law enforcement authorities have arrested four suspected members of an organized cybercrime group accused of orchestrating intricate SIM-swapping attacks that allegedly enabled the theft of millions of dollars in cryptocurrency from victims. The coordinated operation was led by Poland's Central Bureau for Combating Cybercrime (CBZC) with operational assistance from the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), highlighting the cross-border nature of the investigation.

According to investigators, the group combined technical intrusions with social engineering techniques to compromise organizations working alongside telecommunications providers. By infiltrating partner infrastructure and gaining unauthorized access to employee email accounts, the suspects allegedly obtained sensitive information that enabled them to perform fraudulent SIM-swapping attacks.

A SIM-swap attack involves transferring a victim's mobile phone number to a SIM card controlled by an attacker. Once the transfer is completed, the attacker can intercept SMS messages, one-time verification codes, password reset requests, and other communications that rely on the victim's phone number for authentication.

Authorities allege that after taking control of victims' mobile numbers, the cybercriminals intercepted SMS-based authentication messages and email communications before using that access to seize control of cryptocurrency exchange accounts. The attackers then transferred digital assets from compromised accounts before attempting to conceal the proceeds through an extensive laundering operation.

Investigators estimate that the criminal scheme generated millions of U.S. dollars in stolen cryptocurrency. The illicit proceeds were allegedly moved through a distributed financial network consisting of multiple domestic and international bank accounts, international payment platforms, and multi-currency digital wallets in an effort to obscure the origin of the funds. Polish authorities estimate that the total amount laundered exceeded tens of millions of Polish złoty, equivalent to at least approximately US$5 million based on current exchange rates.

In a statement describing the operation, CBZC said the suspects relied on specialized software together with social engineering techniques to gain unauthorized access to infrastructure belonging to organizations cooperating with telecommunications operators, as well as employee email accounts. Investigators said the information obtained during those compromises enabled the illegal cloning and takeover of victims' phone numbers through SIM-swapping attacks.

Authorities further stated that the suspects allegedly treated the criminal enterprise as a continuous source of income, repeatedly moving stolen assets across numerous financial accounts and cryptocurrency wallets located in multiple jurisdictions to complicate financial tracing efforts.

All four suspects have been placed in pre-trial detention. They face allegations including participation in an organized criminal organization, unauthorized access to information systems to facilitate theft, and money laundering. If convicted, the offenses carry penalties of up to 25 years' imprisonment under Polish law.

While Polish authorities have not publicly identified the individuals arrested because of the ongoing international investigation, blockchain investigator ZachXBT claimed that one of the detainees is Wojtek Kulisz, also known online by the alias "Merry." The identification was reportedly based on items visible in official footage released during the police operation. Authorities have not independently confirmed that claim.

Investigators have also declined to disclose which cryptocurrency exchanges were affected or identify the victims, citing the continuing international investigation. Law enforcement agencies say efforts to identify additional victims, trace stolen assets, and pursue further investigative leads remain ongoing.

The case stresses the urgency of the risks associated with SMS-based authentication. Security professionals have long advised cryptocurrency investors and organizations to replace SMS-based two-factor authentication with authenticator applications or hardware security keys whenever possible, as SIM-swapping attacks remain an effective method for bypassing text message verification when attackers successfully compromise telecommunications systems or manipulate carrier processes.

Read more »
rapid7
Cyber Crime Digital Fraud Extortion FBI FTSE IABs ransomware rapid7

Ransomware Revenues Climb as Criminal Networks Expand and Adapt like unwanted vines

 




Ransomware operators continue to generate substantial profits, with new research from Rapid7 indicating that several cybercrime groups are recording revenue growth that outpaces many publicly traded businesses.

According to the cybersecurity firm's analysis, ransomware groups collectively received an estimated $529.2 million during the first quarter of 2026. That figure represents a 39% increase compared with the same period a year earlier. Rapid7 noted that none of the companies within the FTSE 350 index reported year-over-year revenue growth exceeding 30% during that quarter, placing ransomware operators among the fastest-growing entities examined in the study.

Several well-established ransomware operations appear to be benefiting from this trend. Rapid7 estimates that the Qilin ransomware group generated approximately $193 million between July 2025 and March 2026. During the same period, the Gentleman group is estimated to have collected roughly $52 million in ransom payments.

Rapid7 researchers argue that modern ransomware operations bear little resemblance to the stereotype of small groups of hackers working independently. Instead, many function through interconnected networks of specialists who focus on specific stages of an attack. Some actors gain access to victim networks, others develop malware, while separate teams handle extortion demands and payment negotiations.

A major factor behind this growth is the emergence of Initial Access Brokers, or IABs. These actors specialize in obtaining access to corporate networks and then selling that access to other criminals. As a result, launching a ransomware attack no longer requires extensive technical expertise. Access to compromised systems, attack tools, and even managed cybercrime services can now be purchased through underground marketplaces.

Researchers say this division of labor has created a more structured criminal economy. Different groups contribute individual services, allowing ransomware campaigns to operate through networks that resemble commercial supply chains rather than isolated criminal crews.

The study also highlights the resilience of these operations. Infrastructure used by ransomware groups, including servers, data leak platforms, and victim negotiation portals, can often be restored quickly after disruptions. Law enforcement agencies, meanwhile, frequently require lengthy investigations and international coordination before conducting enforcement actions. This difference in speed allows many criminal networks to continue operating even when portions of their infrastructure are removed.

Rapid7 CTO EMEA Thom Langford said ransomware groups have demonstrated an ability to continue generating revenue despite disruptions because their operations are designed to function even when individual components are taken offline. In many cases, the removal of a single server or criminal group does not significantly affect the broader ecosystem supporting ransomware activity.

The findings come amid continued financial losses linked to cybercrime. According to the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center, organizations and individuals reported more than $16 billion in cybercrime losses during 2024, reflecting the growing economic impact of digital fraud, extortion, and network intrusions.

To reduce ransomware risk, Rapid7 recommends that organizations continuously review their exposed systems and identify weaknesses that could provide attackers with an entry point. Particular attention should be given to misconfigured services, overlooked assets, and internet-facing systems, which are frequently targeted by Initial Access Brokers seeking access to corporate environments.

The company also advises security teams to make greater use of threat intelligence to understand how attackers operate, including the infrastructure, tools, and access methods commonly used during intrusions. Researchers further recommend strengthening identity security through tighter access controls, least-privilege policies, and monitoring for signs that employee credentials have been stolen, resold, or abused.

According to Rapid7, disrupting ransomware attacks before attackers establish access remains one of the most effective defensive strategies. By identifying weaknesses early and restricting opportunities for credential theft, organizations may be able to prevent ransomware incidents before they progress to the extortion stage.

Read more »
W3LL Phishing
Cyber Crime FBI Indonesian Police Joint Operation W3LL Phishing

FBI and Indonesian Police Dismantle W3LL Phishing Network in Major Cybercrime Bust

 

In a landmark international operation, the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) collaborated with the Indonesian National Police to dismantle the W3LL phishing network, a sophisticated cybercrime platform responsible for over $20 million in attempted fraud.Authorities seized critical infrastructure, including key domains, and detained the alleged developer, identified as G.L., marking the first joint U.S.-Indonesia effort to shut down a hacking platform.

The FBI's Atlanta division led the charge, emphasizing that the takedown severs a vital tool cybercriminals used to steal account credentials from thousands of victims worldwide. The W3LL phishing kit, sold for around $500, empowered even low-skilled hackers by providing ready-made templates mimicking legitimate login pages for banks and services like Microsoft 365. This phishing-as-a-service (PhaaS) model allowed attackers to deploy fake sites that harvested credentials, hijacked session cookies, and bypassed multi-factor authentication (MFA) via adversary-in-the-middle (AitM) techniques.

First documented by Group-IB in 2023, W3LL operated through an underground "W3LL Store" serving about 500 threat actors with tools for phishing, business email compromise (BEC), and stolen data sales. Active since 2017, the network's developer previously created spam tools like PunnySender and evolved W3LL into a full-service ecosystem, reselling over 25,000 compromised accounts from 2019 to 2023. Even after the W3LL Store shuttered in 2023, operations persisted via encrypted messaging, rebranding the kit and targeting over 17,000 victims in 2023-2024 alone. French firm Sekoia noted code reuse in other kits like Sneaky 2FA, highlighting W3LL's enduring influence in the cyber underground. 

FBI Atlanta Special Agent in Charge Marlo Graham hailed the bust as a strike against "full-service cybercrime," underscoring ongoing partnerships to protect the public. This operation disrupts a key resource for global fraud, but experts warn that cracked versions and similar kits continue circulating, perpetuating threats.For users in India and Asia, where phishing surges amid rising digital banking, the case spotlights the need for vigilance against PhaaS proliferation. 

As cybersecurity evolves, such takedowns signal stronger global enforcement, yet the low barrier to entry for phishing tools demands proactive defenses like direct URL typing and advanced MFA. This victory reinforces international cooperation's role in combating cybercrime, potentially deterring similar networks while urging organizations to bolster detection.
Read more »
Temu
Android Users Apps CapCut China data access Data Breach FBI Temu

FBI Warns Smartphone Users About Risks Linked to Foreign Apps, Especially Chinese Platforms

 



The Federal Bureau of Investigation has issued a fresh alert cautioning users about potential security and privacy threats posed by mobile applications developed outside the United States, particularly those linked to China. The advisory emphasizes that while the concern may seem obvious, many users continue to download such apps without fully understanding the risks.

In its public notice, the agency highlighted that a significant number of widely used and top-earning apps in the U.S. market are owned or operated by foreign companies. Many of these are tied to Chinese firms, raising concerns due to China’s legal framework governing data access.

At the center of the warning are provisions within China’s National Intelligence Law. Under Article 7, individuals and organizations are required to assist state intelligence efforts and maintain secrecy around such cooperation. Article 14 further allows authorities to demand support, data, or cooperation from entities and citizens. Together, these provisions create a legal pathway through which user data collected by apps could be accessed by the Chinese state.

Despite raising these concerns, the FBI has not published a formal list of high-risk apps. Instead, it has urged users to evaluate all foreign-developed applications before installing them. Media reports, including analysis referenced by outlets such as New York Post, suggest that popular platforms like CapCut, Temu, SHEIN, and Lemon8 fall into this broader category of concern.

Further analysis by TechRadar indicates that several of these apps rank highly in download charts across both Android and iOS platforms. On Android, for example, TikTok Lite appears among the most downloaded, alongside TikTok and Temu. Some apps are linked to developers based in Hong Kong or operate through complex international structures, making origin tracing less transparent. While Android devices face higher exposure due to sideloading capabilities, iPhone users are not entirely shielded from such risks.

Notably, platforms like TikTok, CapCut, and Lemon8 currently operate in the U.S. under TikTok USDS LLC, a joint venture backed by Oracle Corporation, with majority U.S. ownership. This structure means their U.S. operations are treated differently from their global counterparts, even though their origins remain tied to Chinese development.

The FBI stresses that its advisory is not a blanket ban on Chinese apps. Rather, it encourages users to be more vigilant. One key concern is the type of permissions users grant during installation. Many individuals overlook privacy policies, allowing apps to continuously gather sensitive data such as contact lists, location details, and personal identifiers.

This data can be used to build detailed social networks, which may later support targeted cyberattacks or social engineering campaigns. Some applications also include features that encourage users to invite contacts, enabling developers to collect additional personal data such as names, email addresses, phone numbers, and physical addresses.

Another major concern is data storage. Certain apps explicitly state that collected information may be stored on servers located in China for extended periods. In some cases, users cannot access app functionality unless they agree to such data-sharing practices.

Beyond privacy risks, the FBI also warns about potential cybersecurity threats. Some foreign-developed apps may include hidden malicious components capable of exploiting system vulnerabilities, collecting unauthorized data, or establishing persistent backdoor access on devices.

The advisory highlights that installing apps from unofficial sources significantly increases these risks. This is particularly relevant for Android users, where sideloading is more common. While official app stores conduct security checks to detect harmful code, third-party sources may bypass these safeguards. Companies like Google have taken steps to limit installations from unknown developers, though risks remain.

To mitigate exposure, the FBI recommends several precautionary measures:

• Install applications only from official app stores

• Review terms of service and user agreements carefully

• Restrict unnecessary permissions and data sharing

• Regularly update passwords

• Keep device software up to date

In a parallel development stressing upon global regulatory tensions, China recently ordered the removal of a decentralized messaging application created by Jack Dorsey from its local app store. Authorities claimed the app violated national internet regulations, reinforcing how governments worldwide are tightening control over digital platforms.

The larger takeaway is that app-related risks are no longer limited to malware alone. Increasingly, they are shaped by legal frameworks, data governance policies, and geopolitical dynamics. For everyday users, this makes informed decision-making around app downloads more critical than ever.

Read more »
Malware attacks
Airport WiFi Security Cyber Attacks cybersecurity threats FBI FBI FBI warning Hacker attack Internet Routers Malware attacks

FBI Warns Outdated Wi-Fi Routers Are Being Targeted in Malware and Botnet Attacks

 

Cybersecurity risks could rise when outdated home routers stop getting manufacturer support, federal agents say. Devices from the late 2000s into the early 2010s often fall out of update cycles, leaving networks open. Without patches, vulnerabilities stay unaddressed - making intrusion more likely over time. Older models reaching end-of-life lack protection upgrades once available. This gap draws attention from officials tracking digital threats to household systems. 

Older network equipment often loses support as makers discontinue update releases. Once patching ends, weaknesses found earlier stay open indefinitely. Such gaps let hackers break in more easily. Devices like obsolete routers now attract criminals who deploy malicious code. Access at admin level gets seized without owners noticing. Infected machines may join hidden networks controlled remotely. Evidence shows law enforcement warning about these risks repeatedly. 

Built from hijacked devices, botnets answer to remote operators. These collections of infected machines frequently enable massive digital assaults. Instead of serving legitimate users, they route harmful data across the web. Criminals rely on them to mask where attacks originate. Through hidden channels, wrongdoers stay anonymous during operations. 

Back in 2011, Linksys made several routers later flagged as weak by the FBI. Devices like the E1200, E2500, and E4200 came under scrutiny due to security flaws. Earlier models also appear on the list - take the WRT320N, launched in 2009. Then there is the M10, hitting shelves a year after that one. Some routers come equipped with remote setup options, letting people adjust settings using web-connected interfaces. 

Though useful, such access may lead to problems if flaws are left unfixed. Hackers regularly search online for devices running open management ports, particularly ones stuck on old software versions. Hackers start by spotting weak routers, then slip through software gaps to plant harmful programs straight onto the machine. Once inside, that hidden code opens the door wide - giving intruders complete control while setting up secret talks with remote hubs. 

Sometimes, these taken devices ping those distant centers each minute, just to say they’re still online and waiting. Opened network ports on routers might let malware turn devices into proxies. With such access, attackers send harmful data across infected networks instead of launching attacks directly. Some even trade entry rights to third parties wanting to mask where they operate from. What makes router-based infections tricky is how hard they are to spot for most people. 

Since standard antivirus tools target laptops and phones, routers often fall outside their scope. Running within the router's own software, the malware stays hidden even when everything seems to work fine. The network keeps running smoothly, masking the presence of harmful code tucked deep inside. Older routers without regular updates become weak spots over time. 

Because of this, specialists suggest swapping them out. A modern replacement brings continued protection through active maintenance. This shift lowers chances of intrusions via obsolete equipment found in personal setups.
Read more »
malware
ATM jackpotting Bank Security FBI Financial crime malware

ATM Jackpotting Malware Triggers Record Global ATM Heists in 2025

 

ATM jackpotting attacks surged dramatically in 2025, with cybercriminals using specialized malware to force cash machines to spit out money on command, often without touching any customer account. This new wave of attacks exposed serious weaknesses in how banks protect the physical and digital components of their ATM fleets. 

According to FBI figures, there have been about 1,900 reported ATM jackpotting cases in the United States since 2020, and more than 700 of those incidents occurred in 2025 alone, causing over 20 million dollars in losses. The attacks rely heavily on malware families such as Ploutus, which has been around for over a decade but continues to evolve. Instead of targeting customer accounts, Ploutus directly compromises the ATM’s operating system, allowing crooks to drain cassettes in minutes before anyone notices something is wrong. 

To execute a jackpotting operation, attackers first need physical access to the machine’s internals. The FBI notes that gangs often use widely available “generic” keys to open the service panel, then remove or connect to the hard drive or USB ports. Once inside, they either load malware onto the existing drive or swap in a pre‑infected disk that boots a compromised operating system capable of issuing unauthorized dispense commands. In many cases, a mule returns later, enters a secret code or connects a device, and collects the cash as the ATM empties itself.

What makes these operations so dangerous is that the malware can bypass normal bank authorization checks and trigger cash withdrawals without a card, PIN, or even a linked account.Because the machine behaves as if it is performing legitimate transactions, banks often only discover the theft after reconciling cash levels and seeing large, unexplained shortages. The U.S. Justice Department has already charged dozens of suspects in jackpotting schemes, including crews tied to transnational criminal groups accused of stealing millions of dollars from victim banks and credit unions. 

In response, the FBI and regulators are urging financial institutions and ATM operators to harden both physical and software defenses. Recommended steps include replacing standard locks, reinforcing ATM cabinets, keeping systems fully patched, and closely monitoring machines for signs of tampering or unexpected restarts. As 2026, ATM jackpotting has become a priority threat for the banking sector, underlining the need for continuous security upgrades and better coordination between banks, law enforcement, and cybersecurity teams.
Read more »
Scam
Bangladesh Cybersecurity FBI Identity Fraud Privacy Scam

U.S. Authorities Shut Down Online Network Selling Fake Identity Templates

 



United States federal authorities have taken down an online operation accused of supplying tools used in identity fraud across multiple countries. The case centers on a Bangladeshi national who allegedly managed several websites that sold digital templates designed to imitate official government identification documents.

According to U.S. prosecutors, the accused individual, Zahid Hasan, is a 29-year-old resident of Dhaka. He is alleged to have operated an online business that distributed downloadable files resembling authentic documents such as U.S. passports, social security cards, and state driver’s licenses. These files were not physical IDs but editable digital templates that buyers could modify by inserting personal details and photographs.

Court records indicate that the operation ran for several years, beginning in 2021 and continuing until early 2025. During this period, the websites reportedly attracted customers from around the world. Investigators estimate that more than 1,400 individuals purchased these templates, generating nearly $2.9 million in revenue. Despite the scale of the operation, individual items were sold at relatively low prices, with some templates costing less than $15.

Law enforcement officials state that such templates are commonly used to bypass identity verification systems. Once edited, the counterfeit documents can be presented to banks, cryptocurrency platforms, and online services that rely on document uploads to confirm a user’s identity. This type of fraud poses serious risks, as it enables financial crimes, account takeovers, and misuse of digital platforms.

The investigation intensified after U.S. authorities traced a transaction in which Bitcoin was exchanged for fraudulent templates by a buyer located in Montana. Following this development, federal agents moved to seize multiple domains allegedly connected to the operation. These websites are now under government control and no longer accessible for illegal activity.

The case involved extensive coordination between agencies. The FBI’s Billings Division and Salt Lake City Cyber Task Force led the investigation, with support from the FBI’s International Operations Division. Authorities in Bangladesh, including the Dhaka Metropolitan Police’s Counterterrorism and Transnational Crime Unit, also assisted in tracking the alleged activities.

A federal grand jury has returned a nine-count indictment against Hasan. The charges include multiple counts related to the distribution of false identification documents, passport fraud, and social security fraud. If convicted, the penalties could include lengthy prison sentences, substantial fines, and supervised release following incarceration.

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Benjamin Hargrove. As with all criminal proceedings, the charges represent allegations, and the accused is presumed innocent unless proven guilty in court.

Cybersecurity experts note that the availability of such tools highlights the growing sophistication of digital fraud networks. The case is an alarming call for the importance of international cooperation and continuous monitoring to protect identity systems and prevent large-scale misuse of personal data.



Read more »
Password Security
Compromised Passwords Cyber Security Cyberattacks CyberCrime Data Theft FBI FBI Alert Password Security

FBI Discovers 630 Million Stolen Passwords in Major Cybercrime Investigation

 

A newly disclosed trove of stolen credentials has underscored the scale of modern cybercrime after U.S. federal investigators uncovered hundreds of millions of compromised passwords on devices seized from a single suspected hacker. The dataset, comprising approximately 630 million passwords, has now been integrated into the widely used Have I Been Pwned (HIBP) database, significantly expanding its ability to warn users about exposed credentials. 

The passwords were provided to HIBP by the Federal Bureau of Investigation as part of ongoing cybercrime investigations. According to Troy Hunt, the security researcher behind the service, this latest contribution is particularly striking because it originates from one individual rather than a large breach aggregation. While the FBI has shared compromised credentials with HIBP for several years, the sheer volume associated with this case highlights how centralized and extensive credential theft operations have become. 

Initial analysis suggests the data was collected from a mixture of underground sources, including dark web marketplaces, messaging platforms such as Telegram, and large-scale infostealer malware campaigns. Not all of the passwords were previously unknown, but a meaningful portion had never appeared in public breach repositories. Roughly 7.4% of the dataset represents newly identified compromised passwords, amounting to tens of millions of credentials that were previously undetectable by users relying on breach-monitoring tools. 

Security experts warn that even recycled or older passwords remain highly valuable to attackers. Stolen credentials are frequently reused in credential-stuffing attacks, where automated tools attempt the same password across multiple platforms. Because many users continue to reuse passwords, a single exposed credential can provide access to multiple accounts, amplifying the potential impact of historical data leaks. 

The expanded dataset is now searchable through the Pwned Passwords service, which allows users to check whether a password has appeared in known breach collections. The system is designed to preserve privacy by hashing submitted passwords and ensuring no personally identifiable information is stored or associated with search results. This enables individuals and organizations to proactively block compromised passwords without exposing sensitive data. 

The discovery has renewed calls for stronger credential hygiene across both consumer and enterprise environments. Cybersecurity professionals consistently emphasize that password reuse and weak password creation remain among the most common contributors to account compromise. Password managers are widely recommended as an effective countermeasure, as they allow users to generate and store long, unique passwords for every service without relying on memory. 

In addition to password managers, broader adoption of passkeys and multi-factor authentication is increasingly viewed as essential. These technologies significantly reduce reliance on static passwords and make stolen credential databases far less useful to attackers. Many platforms now support these features, yet adoption remains inconsistent. 

As law enforcement continues to uncover massive credential repositories during cybercrime investigations, experts caution that similar discoveries are likely in the future. Each new dataset reinforces the importance of assuming passwords will eventually be exposed and building defenses accordingly. Regular password audits, automated breach detection, and layered authentication controls are now considered baseline requirements for maintaining digital security.
Read more »
Voice Cloning
AI Impersonation Cyber Attacks Encrypted Messaging Abuse FBI Government Cyber Threats Signal Exploits Smishing Attacks Social Engineering Vishing Scams Voice Cloning

Cyber Threat Actors Escalate Impersonation of Senior US Government Officials


Federal law enforcement officials are raising a lot of concern about an ongoing cybercrime operation involving threat actors impersonating senior figures across the American political landscape, including state government leaders, White House officials, Cabinet members, and congressional members. 

These threat actors continue to impersonate senior figures in the American political landscape. Based on information provided by the FBI, the social engineering campaign has been operating since at least 2023. 

The campaign relies on a calculated mix of both text-based and voice-based social engineering techniques, with attackers using smishing and increasingly sophisticated artificial intelligence-generated voice messages to bolster their legitimacy. 

There have been no shortages of victims in this operation, not only government officials, but also their family members and personal contacts, demonstrating the breadth of the operation and its persistence. 

Often when fraudsters initiate contact, they reference familiar or contextually relevant topics in order to elude detection while moving the fraud forward with the threat of taking down the target on encrypted messaging platforms. This tactic is often used to evade detection and further advance the fraud.

Several federal law enforcement agencies have identified this activity as part of a widespread espionage operation developed by a group of individuals who are impersonating United States government officials to obtain potentially sensitive information, as well as to perpetrate financial and influence-driven scams. 

In May, the bureau updated its report on the campaign, which indicated that it had been active since at least April 2025. However, in a follow-up update from Friday, it revised that assessment, adding that there is evidence that the impersonation campaign goes back to 2023, as well as the previous year. 

An FBI public service announcement revealed that malicious actors have posed as government officials and cabinet members of the White House, members of Congress and high-level officials of state governments in order to engage targets that have apparently included the officials' family members and personal acquaintances as targets. 

During the Trump administration, the government used encryption-enhanced messaging platforms, such as Signal, along with voice cloning technology that is designed to replicate the sounds of senior officials to convincingly mimic senior officials in government—taking advantage of the platform’s legitimate use during the administration as a way to communicate with government officials. 

It appears that the activity may have persisted across multiple administrations, including the Biden presidency, based on the expanded timeline, even though there has been no indication of how many individuals, groups, or distinct threat actors may have been involved during the period of the campaign. 

During the ongoing campaign, the FBI has published detailed guidelines that can assist individuals in recognizing and responding to suspicious communications in order to counter the ongoing campaign. In addition, the bureau advises consumers to do independent research before engaging anyone claiming to be a government official, such as researching the number, organization, or person from which the contact is coming, and verifying the legitimacy of that contact by using an independent contact method obtained separately. 

The importance of paying attention to subtle variations in email addresses, phone numbers, URLs, and spelling must be stressed above all else, since attackers often rely on subtle differences in order to make their attacks appear legitimized. 

As part of the guidance, people also highlight the telltale signs of manipulated or artificially generated content, including visual irregularities, unnatural movements, distorted features, and discrepancies in light and shadow, as well as audio cues such as call lag, mismatched speech patterns, or unnatural sound. 

Since artificial intelligence-driven impersonation tools have become increasingly sophisticated, the FBI cautions that the message may not be easily distinguishable from a genuine communication if it is not carefully examined. Anyone who has any doubts is encouraged to contact their organization's security teams or report the activity to the FBI. 

According to CSIA, the activity is primarily aimed at targets in the United States, the Middle East, and Europe that are high-value targets, including current and former senior government officials, military personnel, and political officials, along with civil society organizations, and other at-risk individuals. 

There are three dominant techniques that are used by the group to conduct this operation: phishing campaigns and malicious QR codes that are used to link a malicious computer to a victim’s account, zero-click exploits, which do not require interaction from the victim, and impersonating widely trusted messaging platforms such as Signal and WhatsApp to persuade targets to install spyware or provide information. 

In a recent study published by Google, CISA cited how multiple Russian-aligned espionage groups have abused Signal's "linked devices" feature by causing victims to scan weaponized QR codes, which has allowed attackers to silently pair their own infrastructure with the victim's account and receive messages simultaneously without completely compromising the victim's device. 

Additionally, the advisory noted that there is a growing trend among threat actors that they use completely counterfeit messaging applications instead of phishing pages to deceive their targets. This tactic has been recently shown in the findings of Android spyware masquerading as Signal that was targeting individuals in the United Arab Emirates and siphoning their backups of chats, documents, media, and contacts. 

A warning has been issued following an intensified international crackdown on commercial spyware, including a landmark ruling from a federal court in October which permanently barred NSO Group from targeting WhatsApp. Meta previously referred to that ruling as being a significant step forward in user privacy. 

In total, these disclosures demonstrate the rapid evolution of impersonation techniques that are changing the threat landscape for both public institutions and individuals. As a result, traditional trust signals are eroded by the convergence of encrypted communications, artificial intelligence-enabled voice synthesis, and social engineering. This has forced both governments and businesses to rethink the way sensitive interactions are initiated and verified in the future. 

Experts in the field of cybersecurity are increasingly emphasizing the importance of stricter authentication protocols, routine cybersecurity training for high-risk individuals, and clearer guidelines on how encrypted platforms should be used in official business. 

The campaign, which has been widely seen in government circles, also serves as a warning to businesses, civil society groups, and individuals that proximity to famous figures can themselves pose a risk to hackers. 

In the process of investigating and refining their response to these threats, federal agencies will have to find ways to strike a balance between the legitimate benefits of modern communication tools and measures that protect them from being exploited by others. For such campaigns to be limited in effect and for trust to be preserved in both digital communications and democratic institutions, sustained vigilance, cross-agency coordination, and public awareness will be critical.
Read more »
Virtual Kidnapping
Cyber Crime FBI Hacking Scammers Sensitive Information Virtual Kidnapping

FBI Alerts Public about Scammers Using Altered Online Photos to Stage Fake Kidnappings

 



The Federal Bureau of Investigation has issued a new advisory warning people about a growing extortion tactic in which criminals take photos posted online, manipulate them, and present the edited images as supposed evidence during fake kidnapping attempts. The agency reports that these incidents, often described as virtual kidnappings, are designed to panic the target into paying quickly before verifying the claims.


How the scam begins

The operation usually starts when criminals search social media accounts or any platform where people share personal photos publicly. They collect pictures of individuals, including children, teenagers, and adults, and then edit those images to make it appear as though the person is being held against their will. Scammers may change facial expressions, blur backgrounds, add shadows, or alter body positions to create a sense of danger.

Once they prepare these altered images, they contact a relative or friend of the person in the photo. In most cases, they send a sudden text or place a call claiming a loved one has been kidnapped. The message is crafted to create immediate panic and often includes threats of harm if payment is not made right away.


The role of fake “proof of life”

One recurring tactic is the use of emotionally charged photos or short video clips that appear to show the victim in distress. These materials are presented as proof that the kidnapping is real. However, investigators have observed that the content often contains mistakes that reveal it has been edited. The inconsistencies can range from missing tattoos or scars to unnatural lighting, distorted facial proportions, or visual elements that do not match known photos of the person.

Criminals also try to limit the victim’s ability to examine the images closely. Some use disappearing messages or apps that make screenshots difficult. Others send messages in rapid succession to prevent the victim from taking a moment to reach out to the supposed abducted individual.


Why these scams escalate quickly

Scammers depend on speed and emotional intensity. They frequently insist that any delay will lead to harm, which pressures victims to make decisions without checking whether their loved one is actually safe. In some situations, criminals exploit posts about missing persons by inserting themselves into ongoing searches and providing false updates.

The FBI urges people to be mindful of the information they share online, especially when it involves personal photos, travel details, or locations. The agency recommends that families set up a private code word that can be used during emergencies to confirm identity. Individuals should avoid sharing personal information with unknown callers or strangers while traveling.

If someone receives a threatening call or message, the FBI advises them to stay calm and attempt to contact the alleged victim directly through verified communication channels. People should record or capture any messages, screenshots, phone numbers, images, or audio clips connected to the incident. These materials can help law enforcement determine whether the event is a hoax.

Anyone who believes they have been targeted by a virtual kidnapping attempt is encouraged to submit a report to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center at IC3.gov. The agency requests detailed information, including phone numbers used by the scammer, payment instructions, message transcripts, and any photos or videos that were provided as supposed evidence.





Read more »
User Security
Cyber Fraud FBI IC3 Impersonation phishing User Security

FBI Warns of Cybercriminals Impersonating IC3 to Steal Personal Data

 

The FBI has issued a public service announcement warning that cybercriminals are impersonating the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) and even cloning its website to steal victims’ personal and financial data.Attackers are exploiting public trust in federal law enforcement by creating fake IC3-branded domains and lookalike reporting portals, then driving victims to these sites via phishing emails, messages, and search engine manipulation so people think they are filing a legitimate cybercrime report. 

The alert—referenced as PSA I-091925—describes threat actors spoofing the official IC3 website and related communications, with the goal of harvesting names, home addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, and banking details under the pretext of gathering evidence for an investigation or helping recover lost funds.The FBI stresses that visiting these fake sites or responding to unsolicited “IC3” outreach could lead not only to identity theft and financial fraud but also to further compromise through follow‑on scams using the stolen data.

Security experts situates this campaign within a broader surge in impersonation attacks, noting that law enforcement, government agencies, and major brands have all been targets of cloned sites and spoofed communications, often enhanced by AI to appear more convincing. It highlights that scammers may blend IC3 impersonation with other fraud patterns, such as bogus refund or recovery services, “phantom hacker” style tech‑support narratives, or messages claiming to fix account compromises, all framed as official FBI assistance. 

The FBI has issued guidelines to safeguard Americans from phishing campaign. The real IC3 does not charge fees, will never ask for payment or direct victims to third‑party companies to recover funds, and does not operate any official presence on social media. Genuine IC3 reporting should be done only through the official ic3.gov domain, accessed by typing the URL directly into the browser or using trusted bookmarks, rather than clicking on links in unsolicited messages or search ads. 

Additionally, to mitigate risk the FBI recommends treating any unexpected communication claiming to be from the FBI or IC3 with skepticism, independently verify contact details through official channels, and avoid sharing sensitive information or making payments based on pressure tactics. It closes by urging individuals and organizations to train staff on recognizing impersonation scams, double‑check domains and email addresses, and promptly report suspected fake FBI or IC3 activity using confirmed, legitimate FBI contact points.
Read more »
Salesforce
BreachForums Cyber Attacks Data Leak FBI LAPSUS$ Salesforce

BreachForums Taken Down by FBI and French Authorities as LAPSUS$-Linked Group Threatens Salesforce Data Leak

 



U.S. and French law enforcement agencies have seized the latest version of BreachForums, a cybercrime platform known for hosting stolen databases and leaked information. The takedown was carried out by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the U.S. Department of Justice, and French cybercrime authorities, who placed an official seizure notice on the site on October 9.

This development comes just hours before an extortion deadline announced by a threat group calling itself Scattered LAPSUS$ Hunters, which had threatened to leak data allegedly stolen from Salesforce and Salesloft if ransom demands were not met by October 10.

The seizure was first noticed on Telegram before it became official. A threat actor using the alias “emo” had observed that BreachForums’ domain was using Cloudflare name servers associated with previously seized FBI sites, suggesting law enforcement action was imminent.

Following the seizure, Scattered LAPSUS$ Hunters confirmed the action on its Telegram channel through a PGP-signed message, claiming that all their BreachForums-related domains and backend infrastructure were taken offline and destroyed. The group, however, asserted that its members had not been arrested and that their Tor-based data leak site remained active.

“The era of forums is over,” the message read, warning members to maintain operational security and avoid new BreachForums clones, which the group claimed could be “honeypots” operated by law enforcement.


Compromised Infrastructure and Data

The group stated that during the seizure, all BreachForums database backups dating from 2023 to the present were compromised, along with escrow and server systems. They also alleged that their onion hidden service was affected because the underlying infrastructure had been seized and destroyed.

Despite this, Scattered LAPSUS$ Hunters insisted that the takedown would not affect their planned Salesforce data leak campaign. The group reiterated that the October 10 deadline for victims to comply with their ransom demands remained unchanged.

This marks the fourth major seizure in the history of BreachForums and its predecessors, including the earlier RaidForums. Both forums have been repeatedly targeted by global law enforcement operations and linked to several high-profile arrests over the years.

The group also revealed that the widely known administrator “pompompurin,” believed to have launched BreachForums after RaidForums’ closure, had merely been a “front,” suggesting that the forum’s operations were coordinated by a wider network of individuals from the start.


What Lies Ahead

While the seizure has temporarily disrupted the group’s clearnet operations, cyber experts caution that criminal forums often migrate to the dark web or encrypted channels to continue their activities. Authorities are expected to pursue further investigations in the coming weeks to identify and apprehend those involved.

For cybersecurity professionals and enterprises, it's high time to give importance to monitoring data exposure risks and staying alert to potential secondary leaks, especially when extortion groups remain active through alternate platforms.



Read more »
Software
FBI financial transactions Fraud phantom hacker Privacy schemes Software

FBI Warns Against Screen Sharing Amid Rise in “Phantom Hacker” Scam

 



The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has issued an urgent alert about a fast-spreading scam in which cybercriminals gain access to victims’ devices through screen-sharing features, allowing them to steal money directly from bank accounts.

Known as the “phantom hacker” scheme, the fraud begins with a phone call or message that appears to come from a legitimate bank or support service. The caller warns that the user’s account has been compromised and offers to “help” by transferring funds to a secure location. In reality, the transfer moves the victim’s money straight to the attacker’s account.

Traditionally, these scams relied on tricking users into installing remote-access software, but the FBI now reports a troubling shift. Scammers are increasingly exploiting tools already built into smartphones, specifically screen-sharing options available in widely used communication apps.

One such example involves WhatsApp, a messaging service used by over three billion people worldwide. The app recently introduced a screen-sharing feature during video calls, designed for legitimate collaboration. However, this function also allows the person on the other end of the call to see everything displayed on a user’s screen, including sensitive details such as login credentials and banking information.

Although WhatsApp notifies users to only share their screens with trusted contacts, attackers often use social engineering to bypass suspicion. The FBI notes that fraudsters frequently begin with a normal phone call before requesting to continue the conversation over WhatsApp, claiming that it offers greater security. Once the victim joins the call and enables screen sharing, scammers can observe financial transactions in real time without ever needing to install malicious software.

Experts emphasize that encryption, while essential for privacy, also prevents WhatsApp or any external authority from monitoring these fraudulent activities. The FBI therefore urges users to remain cautious and to never share their screen, banking details, or verification codes during unsolicited calls.

Cybersecurity professionals advise that individuals should hang up immediately if asked to join a video call or screen-sharing session by anyone claiming to represent a bank or technology company. Instead, contact the organization directly through verified customer-care numbers or official websites. Reporting suspicious incidents can also help prevent future cases.

The scale of financial fraud has reached alarming levels in the United States. According to new findings from the Aspen Institute, scams now cost American households over $158 billion annually, prompting calls for a national strategy to combat organized online crime. More than 80 leaders from public and private sectors have urged the creation of a National Task Force on Fraud and Scam Prevention to coordinate efforts between government bodies and financial institutions.

This rise in screen-sharing scams highlights the growing sophistication of cybercriminals, who are increasingly using everyday digital tools for exploitation. As technology advances, experts stress that public vigilance, real-time verification, and responsible digital habits remain the strongest defenses against emerging threats.



Read more »
Social Engineering
Corporate data Data Breach Extortion Scheme FBI Hackers Salesforce Social Engineering

FBI Warns of Hackers Exploiting Salesforce to Steal Corporate Data

 



The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has issued a pressing security alert regarding two cybercriminal groups that are breaking into corporate Salesforce systems to steal information and demand ransoms. The groups, tracked as UNC6040 and UNC6395, have been carrying out separate but related operations, each using different methods to compromise accounts.

In its official advisory, the FBI explained that attackers are exploiting weaknesses in how companies connect third-party tools to Salesforce. To help organizations defend themselves, the agency released a list of warning signs, including suspicious internet addresses, user activity patterns, and malicious websites linked to the breaches.


How the Attacks took place 

The first campaign, attributed to UNC6040, came to light in mid-2024. According to threat intelligence researchers, the attackers relied on social engineering, particularly through fraudulent phone calls to employees. In these calls, criminals pretended to be IT support staff and convinced workers to link fake Salesforce apps to company accounts. One such application was disguised under the name “My Ticket Portal.” Once connected, the attackers gained access to sensitive databases and downloaded large amounts of customer-related records, especially tables containing account and contact details. The stolen data was later used in extortion schemes by criminal groups.

A newer wave of incidents, tied to UNC6395, was detected a few months later. This group relied on stolen digital tokens from tools such as Salesloft Drift, which normally allow companies to integrate external platforms with Salesforce. With these tokens, the hackers were able to enter Salesforce systems and search through customer support case files. These cases often contained confidential information, including cloud service credentials, passwords, and access keys. Possessing such details gave the attackers the ability to break into additional company systems and steal more data.

Investigations revealed that the compromise of these tokens originated months earlier, when attackers infiltrated the software provider’s code repositories. From there, they stole authentication tokens and expanded their reach, showing how one breach in the supply chain can spread to many organizations.


The Scale of this Campaign 

The campaigns have had far-reaching consequences, affecting a wide range of businesses across different industries. In response, the software vendors involved worked with Salesforce to disable the stolen tokens and forced customers to reauthenticate. Despite these steps, the stolen data and credentials may still pose long-term risks if reused elsewhere.

According to industry reports, the campaigns are believed to have impacted a number of well-known organizations across sectors, including technology firms such as Cloudflare, Zscaler, Tenable, and Palo Alto Networks, as well as companies in finance, retail, and enterprise software. Although the FBI has not officially attributed the intrusions, external researchers have linked the activity to criminal collectives with ties to groups known as ShinyHunters, Lapsus$, and Scattered Spider.


FBI Recommendations

The FBI is urging organizations to take immediate action by reviewing connected third-party applications, monitoring login activity, and rotating any keys or tokens that may have been exposed. Security teams are encouraged to rely on the technical indicators shared in the advisory to detect and block malicious activity.

Although the identity of the hackers remains uncertain, the scale of the attacks highlights how valuable cloud-based platforms like Salesforce have become for criminals. The FBI has not confirmed the groups’ claims about further breaches and has declined to comment on ongoing investigations.

For businesses, the message is clear: protecting cloud environments requires not only technical defenses but also vigilance against social engineering tactics that exploit human trust.



Read more »
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)