Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Showing posts with label NATO security threats. Show all posts

European Governments Turn to Matrix for Secure Sovereign Messaging Amid US Big Tech Concerns

 

A growing number of European governments are turning to Matrix, an open-source messaging architecture, as they seek greater technological sovereignty and independence from US Big Tech companies. Matrix aims to create an open communication standard that allows users to message each other regardless of the platform they use—similar to how email works across different providers. The decentralized protocol supports secure messaging, voice, and video communications while ensuring data control remains within sovereign boundaries. 

Matrix, co-founded by Matthew Hodgson in 2014 as a not-for-profit open-source initiative, has seen wide-scale adoption across Europe. The French government and the German armed forces now have hundreds of thousands of employees using Matrix-based platforms like Tchap and BwMessenger. Swiss Post has also built its own encrypted messaging system for public use, while similar deployments are underway across Sweden, the Netherlands, and the European Commission. NATO has even adopted Matrix to test secure communication alternatives under its NICE2 project. 

Hodgson, who also serves as CEO of Element—a company providing Matrix-based encrypted services to governments and organizations such as France and NATO—explained that interest in Matrix has intensified following global geopolitical developments. He said European governments now view open-source software as a strategic necessity, especially after the US imposed sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) in early 2025. 

The sanctions, which impacted US tech firms supporting the ICC, prompted several European institutions to reconsider their reliance on American cloud and communication services. “We have seen first-hand that US Big Tech companies are not reliable partners,” Hodgson said. “For any country to be operationally dependent on another is a crazy risk.” He added that incidents such as the “Signalgate” scandal—where a US official accidentally shared classified information on a Signal chat—have further fueled the shift toward secure, government-controlled messaging infrastructure. 

Despite this, Europe’s stance on encryption remains complex. While advocating for sovereign encrypted messaging platforms, some governments are simultaneously supporting proposals like Chat Control, which would require platforms to scan messages before encryption. Hodgson criticized such efforts, warning they could weaken global communication security and force companies like Element to withdraw from regions that mandate surveillance. Matrix’s decentralized design offers resilience and security advantages by eliminating a single point of failure. 

Unlike centralized apps such as Signal or WhatsApp, Matrix operates as a distributed network, reducing the risk of large-scale breaches. Moreover, its interoperability means that various Matrix-based apps can communicate seamlessly—enabling, for example, secure exchanges between French and German government networks. Although early Matrix apps were considered less user-friendly, Hodgson said newer versions now rival mainstream encrypted platforms. Funding challenges have slowed development, as governments using Matrix often channel resources toward system integrators rather than the project itself. 

To address this, Matrix is now sustained by a membership model and potential grant funding. Hodgson’s long-term vision is to establish a fully peer-to-peer global communication network that operates without servers and cannot be compromised or monitored. Supported by the Dutch government, Matrix’s ongoing research into such peer-to-peer technology aims to simplify deployment further while enhancing security. 

As Europe continues to invest in secure digital infrastructure, Matrix’s open standard represents a significant step toward technological independence and privacy preservation. 

By embracing decentralized communication, European governments are asserting control over their data, reducing foreign dependence, and reshaping the future of secure messaging in an increasingly uncertain geopolitical landscape.

NATO Collaborates with Start-Ups to Address Growing Security Threats

 

Marking its 75th anniversary at a summit in Washington DC this week, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) focused on Ukraine while emphasizing the importance of new technologies and start-ups to adapt to modern security threats.

In its Washington Summit Declaration, NATO highlighted its accelerated transformation to address current and future threats while maintaining a technological edge. This includes experimenting with and rapidly adopting emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI), biotechnology, and quantum computing.

Phil Lockwood, Head of NATO’s Innovation Unit, told Euronews Next, "We've long recognized that our ability to deter and defend relies on our technological edge. Although we're experiencing unprecedented technological innovation, our edge is potentially eroding. We must work hard to maintain this edge as adversaries and competitors pursue their own technological advancements."

One technology NATO is exploring is seabed mapping, with the Dutch start-up Lobster Robotics as a key partner. "If they had survey equipment, they could have detected the Nord Stream pipeline explosions. While they may not have intervened, at least the threat would have been known," said Stephan Rutten, co-founder and CEO of Lobster Robotics. Lobster Robotics is one of 44 companies selected from 1,300 applicants for NATO's Defence Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic (DIANA) program, which provides resources and networks to address critical defense and security challenges.

DIANA focuses on dual-use innovations, applicable both commercially and for defense. NATO also supports start-ups through the NATO Innovation Fund. Lobster Robotics' optical seabed mapping technology can significantly reduce costs and increase safety compared to using teams of divers. It is particularly useful for mapping critical underwater infrastructure like wind farms and oil rigs.

Access to government or defense contracts can be lucrative yet challenging for start-ups. "It comes down to networking. You need to know the people and how the organization works," Rutten said, noting that NATO’s approval helped them collaborate with governments. "I urge governments to think in the time scale of start-ups. They say they're moving fast, but procurement takes 18 months. I could start five new companies by then."

The Greece-based company Sortiria Technology, another underwater intelligence firm selected by NATO, also finds the procurement process lengthy. "There are long contraction cycles and varied buying processes in each country," said Angelos Tsereklas, Managing Director of Sortiria Technology. "But initiatives like DIANA and the NATO Innovation Fund, as well as support from the European Union and European Investment Bank, are disrupting that model."

This month, NATO launched a second round of the DIANA project, focusing on energy, human health, information security, logistics, and critical infrastructure. Information security is a top concern, with lessons to be learned from Ukraine's experience with sophisticated cyber attacks from Russia.

In its Washington Summit Declaration, NATO warned of cyber threats from Russia and China, announcing a new cyber alliance called the Integrated Cyber Defence Centre. This center will bring together civilian and military personnel from NATO member countries and industry experts.

One notable start-up is Hushmesh, which aims to create a safer, more efficient internet. While its vision may take decades to realize, CEO Manu Fontaine said, "The natural glide path is to develop services on an inherently secure, verified infrastructure." Hushmesh is currently developing a messaging service for a NATO pilot program in 2025.

The Washington Summit Declaration also stated NATO’s intent to monitor technological advancements on the battlefield in Ukraine through experimentation and rapid adoption of emerging technologies. Rutten noted that while government procurement remains challenging, change is underway. "Many countries are becoming more agile and open to innovation faster, inspired by the successes seen in Ukraine. However, it may take a few more years to fully implement these changes."