Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Showing posts with label Cloud Defense. Show all posts

NtKiller Tool Boasts AV/EDR Evasion on Dark Web

 

A threat actor dubbed AlphaGhoul has now begun to push NtKiller-a perilous tool-on the dark web forums, claiming it silently kills antivirus software and bypasses endpoint detection and response systems. As a malware loader, this tool targets popular security products such as Microsoft Defender, ESET, Kaspersky, Bitdefender, and Trend Micro. This puts organizations relying on traditional security in great danger. Its announcement consolidates the escalating commercialization of evasion tools in the underground. 

NtKiller has a modular pricing system; the base price is $500, while the inclusion of rootkit capabilities or UAC bypass would be an additional $300 each, demonstrating the refinement of cybercriminal sales. KrakenLabs researchers witnessed early-boot persistence, embedding the tool within a system at an early stage of boot time, which is long before most security monitors have become active. This mechanism complicates the work of security teams for detection and removal. 

Beyond basic process killing, NtKiller boasts HVCI disabling, VBS manipulation, and memory integrity bypasses among other advanced evasion tactics. Anti-debugging and anti-analysis protections thwart forensic examination and create a gap between hype and proven performance. The silent UAC bypass escalates privileges with no user prompts, its menace amplified when combined with rootkits for persistent, surreptitious access. 

While the claims target enterprise EDR in aggressive modes, independent verification is lacking, and caution should be exercised when reviewing true efficacy. Such tools pose a more significant challenge to organizations because they take advantage of timing and stealth over signature-based defenses. That makes behavioral detection necessary in the security stacks to help with mitigating these threats.

Cybersecurity professionals recommend vigilance, layered defense, and active monitoring as a way of mitigating tools such as NtKiller in these increasing dark web threats. As cybercriminals continue to improve evasion techniques, it requires moving the advantage beyond simple reliance on traditional antivirus. This incident has highlighted the need for timely threat intelligence within enterprise security strategies.

Amazon Links Five-Year Cloud Cyber Campaign to Russia’s Sandworm Group

 

Amazon is talking about a hacking problem that has been going on for a long time. This problem was targeting customers who use cloud services in countries. Amazon says that a group called Sandworm, which is linked to Russias intelligence is behind this hacking. Amazons team that looks at threats found out that this hacking has been happening for five years. The hackers were looking for weaknesses in how customers set up their devices than trying to find problems with the software. They were exploiting these weaknesses to get into customer environments. 

Amazon and the customers were using cloud services. The hackers were targeting these cloud-connected environments. The hacking group Sandworm is the one that Amazon says is responsible, for this activity. The people at Amazon looked at this problem in December. Amazons chief information security officer, CJ Moses said that this is a change in how some groups try to get into important systems. CJ Moses said that these groups are not trying to get in by using software that has not been updated. 

Instead they are looking at devices that are connected to the cloud and are not set up correctly. These devices are how they get into the organizations they are trying to attack. CJ Moses and the people, at Amazon think that this is a way that state-sponsored actors are trying to get into critical infrastructure. The devices that are connected to the cloud are the way that these actors get into the systems they are trying to attack. 

The cyberattacks were different from others. The systems that were compromised were not old or missing security updates. The people who did the attack found problems with the equipment that helps connect things, like gateways and devices that sit at the edge of networks. These devices had been set up incorrectly by the customers who used them. This equipment is usually between the networks of a company and the cloud services they use outside. 

So it gave the attackers a way to get into the rest of the system without needing to find brand weaknesses or use very complicated bad software at the start. The attackers used these edge devices as a kind of bridge to get into the system. They were able to do this because the devices were not set up correctly by the customers. The cyberattacks were able to happen because of this mistake. It made it easier for the attackers to get into the system. The compromised systems, including the routing equipment and gateways were the key, to the attack. 

The bad people got into the system. They were able to get important information like passwords. Then they were able to move to different cloud services and the internal system. Amazon looked at this. They think that the bad people were able to hide what they were doing by making it look like normal activity on the network. This made it harder to catch them. The bad people used passwords and normal paths, on the network so they did not trip any alarms. This meant that the security people did not notice them because they were not doing anything that seemed out of the ordinary. 

The Sandworm activity was seen times over a few years with signs of it going back to at least 2021. The people behind this campaign were going after targets all around the world. They were especially interested in organizations that do important work like those that deal with critical infrastructure. Amazon found out that the people behind the Sandworm activity were really focused on energy companies, in North America and Europe. This shows that the Sandworm activity was a thoughtful and planned operation and that is what makes it so serious the Sandworm activity is a big deal. 

Security specialists looked at the results. They think this is part of a bigger pattern with advanced threat actors. What is happening is that people are taking advantage of mistakes in how thingsre set up rather than looking for things that need to be updated. As organizations start to use hybrid and cloud-based systems this is becoming a bigger problem. Even people who are very good at IT can miss mistakes in how thingsre set up and this can leave them open, to attacks all the time. Security specialists and these advanced threat actors know that they can take advantage of these mistakes without setting off the warnings that something is wrong. 

Advanced threat actors are using these mistakes to get in. Amazons disclosure is a warning that having cloud security is not just about doing the usual updates. Companies that use cloud and hybrid environments for work need to do more. They need to make sure everything is set up correctly always check for problems with devices that are connected to the internet and limit who can get into the system. These things are very important, for security. Amazons cloud security is an example of this. Cloud security requires a lot of work to keep it safe. 

In a separate disclosure, Amazon also acknowledged detecting attempts by North Korean operators to conduct large-scale cyber activity, though this was unrelated to the Sandworm campaign. The company later clarified that the Russian-linked operation targeted customer-managed devices hosted on AWS rather than Amazon’s own infrastructure, and that the activity represented sustained targeting over several years rather than uninterrupted access.

Defend Against Phishing with Multi-Factor Authentication

 

Phishing has been a favored attack vector for threat actors for nearly three decades, and its utilization persists until it loses its effectiveness. The success of phishing largely hinges on exploiting the weakest link in an organization's cybersecurity chain—human behavior.

“Phishing is largely the same whether in the cloud or on-prem[ise], in that it’s exploiting human behavior more than it’s exploiting technology,” said Emily Phelps, director at Cyware.

These attacks primarily aim to pilfer credentials, granting threat actors unfettered access within an organization's infrastructure. Yet, successful cloud-based phishing assaults might be more intricate due to the nuanced ownership of the environment.

Phelps explained that in an on-premise scenario, a compromised ecosystem would be under the jurisdiction of an organization's security and IT team. However, in the cloud—like AWS or Azure—a breached environment is managed by respective organizations yet ultimately owned by Amazon or Microsoft.

Cloud Emerges as the Preferred Phishing Arena

As an increasing number of applications gravitate toward cloud computing, threat actors are unsurprisingly drawn to exploit this realm. Palo Alto Networks Unit 42's report unveiled a staggering 1100% surge in newly identified phishing URLs on legitimate SaaS platforms from June 2021 to June 2022.

The report delineated a tactic where visitors to legitimate web pages are enticed to click a link directing them to a credential-stealing site. By leveraging a legitimate webpage as the principal phishing site, attackers can modify the link to direct victims to a new malicious page, thereby sustaining the original campaign's efficacy.

Cloud applications provide an ideal launchpad for phishing assaults due to their ability to bypass conventional security systems. Cloud-based phishing is further facilitated by the ease of luring unsuspecting users into clicking malevolent email links. Beyond SaaS platforms, cloud applications such as video conferencing and workforce messaging are also being increasingly exploited for launching attacks.

The Role of Phishing-Resistant MFA

Among the most robust defenses against credential-stealing phishing attacks is multifactor authentication (MFA). This approach incorporates several security factors, including something known (like a password), something possessed (such as a phone or email for code reception), and/or something inherent (like a fingerprint). By requiring an additional code-sharing device or a biometric tool for authentication, MFA heightens the difficulty for attackers to breach these security layers.

In the event of a user falling prey to a phishing attack and credentials being compromised, MFA introduces an additional layer of verification inaccessible to threat actors. This may involve SMS verification, email confirmation, or an authenticator app, with the latter being recommended by Phelps.

However, as MFA proves effective against credential theft, threat actors have escalated their strategies to compromise MFA credentials. Phishing remains one of their favored methods, as cautioned by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA):

"In a widely used phishing technique, a threat actor sends an email to a target that convinces the user to visit a threat actor-controlled website that mimics a company’s legitimate login portal. The user submits their username, password, as well as the 6-digit code from their mobile phone’s authenticator app.”

To counter this, CISA endorses phishing-resistant MFA as a strategy to enhance overall cloud security against phishing attacks. Fast ID Online/WebAuthn authentication stands out as a popular option. It operates through separate physical tokens linked to USB or NFC devices or embedded authenticators within laptops and mobile devices.

An alternative approach, albeit less common, is PKI-based phishing-resistant MFA, employing security-chip embedded smart cards linked to both an organization and the individual user. While highly secure, this method necessitates mature security and identity management systems.

While any form of MFA contributes to safeguarding cloud data against phishing, relying solely on commonly used code-sharing methods falls short. Threat actors have devised ways to manipulate users into revealing these codes, often relying on users' inconsistent MFA setup practices. Adopting phishing-resistant MFA and incorporating multiple layers of authentication offers the utmost security against this prevalent cyber threat.