Search This Blog
Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Load More
Trendy Right Now

Popular Posts

Showing posts with label Data protection. Show all posts
Personal Data
cybersecurity threat Data Breach Data Leak Data protection data security Defence Ministry Personal Data

Afghans Report Killings After British Ministry of Defence Data Leak

 

Dozens of Afghans whose personal information was exposed in a British Ministry of Defence (MoD) data breach have reported that their relatives or colleagues were killed because of the leak, according to new research submitted to a UK parliamentary inquiry. The breach, which occurred in February 2022, revealed the identities of nearly 19,000 Afghans who had worked with the UK government during the war in Afghanistan. It happened just six months after the Taliban regained control of Kabul, leaving many of those listed in grave danger. 

The study, conducted by Refugee Legal Support in partnership with Lancaster University and the University of York, surveyed 350 individuals affected by the breach. Of those, 231 said the MoD had directly informed them that their data had been compromised. Nearly 50 respondents said their family members or colleagues were killed as a result, while over 40 percent reported receiving death threats. At least half said their relatives or friends had been targeted by the Taliban following the exposure of their details. 

One participant, a former Afghan special forces member, described how his family suffered extreme violence after the leak. “My father was brutally beaten until his toenails were torn off, and my parents remain under constant threat,” he said, adding that his family continues to face harassment and repeated house searches. Others criticized the British government for waiting too long to alert them, saying the delay had endangered lives unnecessarily.  

According to several accounts, while the MoD discovered the breach in 2023, many affected Afghans were only notified in mid-2025. “Waiting nearly two years to learn that our personal data was exposed placed many of us in serious jeopardy,” said a former Afghan National Army officer still living in Afghanistan. “If we had been told sooner, we could have taken steps to protect our families.”  

Olivia Clark, Executive Director of Refugee Legal Support, said the findings revealed the “devastating human consequences” of the government’s failure to protect sensitive information. “Afghans who risked their lives working alongside British forces have faced renewed threats, violent assaults, and even killings of their loved ones after their identities were exposed,” she said. 

Clark added that only a small portion of those affected have been offered relocation to the UK. The government estimates that more than 7,300 Afghans qualify for resettlement under a program launched in 2024 to assist those placed at risk by the data breach. However, rights organizations say the scheme has been too slow and insufficient compared to the magnitude of the crisis.

The breach has raised significant concerns about how the UK manages sensitive defense data and its responsibilities toward Afghans who supported British missions. For many of those affected, the consequences of the exposure remain deeply personal and ongoing, with families still living under threat while waiting for promised protection or safe passage to the UK.
Read more »
Privacy
AI governance AI Security Corporate Data Breach Cybersecurity Data protection Digital Risk ethical AI Information Security Privacy

Unsecured Corporate Data Found Freely Accessible Through Simple Searches

 


An era when artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly becoming the backbone of modern business innovation is presenting a striking gap between awareness and action in a way that has been largely overlooked. In a recent study conducted by Sapio Research, it has been reported that while most organisations in Europe acknowledge the growing risks associated with AI adoption, only a small number have taken concrete steps towards reducing them.

Based on insights from 800 consumers and 375 finance decision-makers across the UK, Germany, France, and the Netherlands, the Finance Pulse 2024 report highlights a surprising paradox: 93 per cent of companies are aware that artificial intelligence poses a risk, yet only half have developed formal policies to regulate its responsible use. 

There was a significant number of respondents who expressed concern about data security (43%), followed closely by a concern about accountability, transparency, and the lack specialised skills to ensure a safe implementation (both of which reached 29%). In spite of this increased awareness, only 46% of companies currently maintain formal guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence in the workplace, and even fewer—48%—impose restrictions on the type of data that employees are permitted to feed into the systems. 

It has also been noted that just 38% of companies have implemented strict access controls to safeguard sensitive information. Speaking on the findings of this study, Andrew White, CEO and Co-Founder of Sapio Research, commented that even though artificial intelligence remains a high priority for investment across Europe, its rapid integration has left many employers confused about the use of this technology internally and ill-equipped to put in place the necessary governance frameworks.

It was found, in a recent investigation by cybersecurity consulting firm PromptArmor, that there had been a troubling lapse in digital security practices linked to the use of artificial intelligence-powered platforms. According to the firm's researchers, 22 widely used artificial intelligence applications—including Claude, Perplexity, and Vercel V0-had been examined by the firm's researchers, and highly confidential corporate information had been exposed on the internet by way of chatbot interfaces. 

There was an interesting collection of data found in the report, including access tokens for Amazon Web Services (AWS), internal court documents, Oracle salary reports that were explicitly marked as confidential, as well as a memo describing a venture capital firm's investment objectives. As detailed by PCMag, these researchers confirmed that anyone could easily access such sensitive material by entering a simple search query - "site:claude.ai + internal use only" - into any standard search engine, underscoring the fact that the use of unprotected AI integrations in the workplace is becoming a dangerous and unpredictable source of corporate data theft. 

A number of security researchers have long been investigating the vulnerabilities in popular AI chatbots. Recent findings have further strengthened the fragility of the technology's security posture. A vulnerability in ChatGPT has been resolved by OpenAI since August, which could have allowed threat actors to exploit a weakness in ChatGPT that could have allowed them to extract the users' email addresses through manipulation. 

In the same vein, experts at the Black Hat cybersecurity conference demonstrated how hackers could create malicious prompts within Google Calendar invitations by leveraging Google Gemini. Although Google resolved the issue before the conference, similar weaknesses were later found to exist in other AI platforms, such as Microsoft’s Copilot and Salesforce’s Einstein, even though they had been fixed by Google before the conference began.

Microsoft and Salesforce both issued patches in the middle of September, months after researchers reported the flaws in June. It is particularly noteworthy that these discoveries were made by ethical researchers rather than malicious hackers, which underscores the importance of responsible disclosure in safeguarding the integrity of artificial intelligence ecosystems. 

It is evident that, in addition to the security flaws of artificial intelligence, its operational shortcomings have begun to negatively impact organisations financially and reputationally. "AI hallucinations," or the phenomenon in which generative systems produce false or fabricated information with convincing accuracy, is one of the most concerning aspects of artificial intelligence. This type of incident has already had significant consequences for the lawyer involved, who was penalised for submitting a legal brief that was filled with over 20 fictitious court references produced by an artificial intelligence program. 

Deloitte also had to refund the Australian government six figures after submitting an artificial intelligence-assisted report that contained fabricated sources and inaccurate data. This highlighted the dangers of unchecked reliance on artificial intelligence for content generation and highlighted the risk associated with that. As a result of these issues, Stanford University’s Social Media Lab has coined the term “workslop” to describe AI-generated content that appears polished yet is lacking in substance. 

In the United States, 40% of full-time office employees reported that they encountered such material regularly, according to a study conducted. In my opinion, this trend demonstrates a growing disconnect between the supposed benefits of automation and the real efficiency can bring. When employees are spending hours correcting, rewriting, and verifying AI-generated material, the alleged benefits quickly fade away. 

Although what may begin as a convenience may turn out to be a liability, it can reduce production quality, drain resources, and in severe cases, expose companies to compliance violations and regulatory scrutiny. It is a fact that, as artificial intelligence continues to grow and integrate deeply into the digital and corporate ecosystems, it is bringing along with it a multitude of ethical and privacy challenges. 

In the wake of increasing reliance on AI-driven systems, long-standing concerns about unauthorised data collection, opaque processing practices, and algorithmic bias have been magnified, which has contributed to eroding public trust in technology. There is still the threat of unauthorised data usage on the part of many AI platforms, as they quietly collect and analyse user information without explicit consent or full transparency. Consequently, the threat of unauthorised data usage remains a serious concern. 

It is very common for individuals to be manipulated, profiled, and, in severe cases, to become the victims of identity theft as a result of this covert information extraction. Experts emphasise organisations must strengthen regulatory compliance by creating clear opt-in mechanisms, comprehensive deletion protocols, and transparent privacy disclosures that enable users to regain control of their personal information. 

In addition to these alarming concerns, biometric data has also been identified as a very important component of personal security, as it is the most intimate and immutable form of information a person has. Once compromised, biometric identifiers are unable to be replaced, making them prime targets for cybercriminals to exploit once they have been compromised. 

If such information is misused, whether through unauthorised surveillance or large-scale breaches, then it not only poses a greater risk of identity fraud but also raises profound questions regarding ethical and human rights issues. As a consequence of biometric leaks from public databases, citizens have been left vulnerable to long-term consequences that go beyond financial damage, because these systems remain fragile. 

There is also the issue of covert data collection methods embedded in AI systems, which allow them to harvest user information quietly without adequate disclosure, such as browser fingerprinting, behaviour tracking, and hidden cookies. utilising silent surveillance, companies risk losing user trust and being subject to potential regulatory penalties if they fail to comply with tightening data protection laws, such as GDPR. Microsoft and Salesforce both issued patches in the middle of September, months after researchers reported the flaws in June. 

It is particularly noteworthy that these discoveries were made by ethical researchers rather than malicious hackers, which underscores the importance of responsible disclosure in safeguarding the integrity of artificial intelligence ecosystems. It is evident that, in addition to the security flaws of artificial intelligence, its operational shortcomings have begun to negatively impact organisations financially and reputationally. 

"AI hallucinations," or the phenomenon in which generative systems produce false or fabricated information with convincing accuracy, is one of the most concerning aspects of artificial intelligence. This type of incident has already had significant consequences for the lawyer involved, who was penalised for submitting a legal brief that was filled with over 20 fictitious court references produced by an artificial intelligence program.

Deloitte also had to refund the Australian government six figures after submitting an artificial intelligence-assisted report that contained fabricated sources and inaccurate data. This highlighted the dangers of unchecked reliance on artificial intelligence for content generation, highlighted the risk associated with that. As a result of these issues, Stanford University’s Social Media Lab has coined the term “workslop” to describe AI-generated content that appears polished yet is lacking in substance. 

In the United States, 40% of full-time office employees reported that they encountered such material regularly, according to a study conducted. In my opinion, this trend demonstrates a growing disconnect between the supposed benefits of automation and the real efficiency it can bring. 

When employees are spending hours correcting, rewriting, and verifying AI-generated material, the alleged benefits quickly fade away. Although what may begin as a convenience may turn out to be a liability, it can reduce production quality, drain resources, and in severe cases, expose companies to compliance violations and regulatory scrutiny. 

It is a fact that, as artificial intelligence continues to grow and integrate deeply into the digital and corporate ecosystems, it is bringing along with it a multitude of ethical and privacy challenges. In the wake of increasing reliance on AI-driven systems, long-standing concerns about unauthorised data collection, opaque processing practices, and algorithmic bias have been magnified, which has contributed to eroding public trust in technology. 

There is still the threat of unauthorised data usage on the part of many AI platforms, as they quietly collect and analyse user information without explicit consent or full transparency. Consequently, the threat of unauthorised data usage remains a serious concern. It is very common for individuals to be manipulated, profiled, and, in severe cases, to become the victims of identity theft as a result of this covert information extraction. 

Experts emphasise that thatorganisationss must strengthen regulatory compliance by creating clear opt-in mechanisms, comprehensive deletion protocols, and transparent privacy disclosures that enable users to regain control of their personal information. In addition to these alarming concerns, biometric data has also been identified as a very important component of personal security, as it is the most intimate and immutable form of information a person has. 

Once compromised, biometric identifiers are unable to be replaced, making them prime targets for cybercriminals to exploit once they have been compromised. If such information is misused, whether through unauthorised surveillance or large-scale breaches, then it not oonly posesa greater risk of identity fraud but also raises profound questions regarding ethical and human rights issues. 

As a consequence of biometric leaks from public databases, citizens have been left vulnerable to long-term consequences that go beyond financial damage, because these systems remain fragile. There is also the issue of covert data collection methods embedded in AI systems, which allow them to harvest user information quietly without adequate disclosure, such as browser fingerprinting behaviourr tracking, and hidden cookies. 
By 
utilising silent surveillance, companies risk losing user trust and being subject to potential regulatory penalties if they fail to comply with tightening data protection laws, such as GDPR. Furthermore, the challenges extend further than privacy, further exposing the vulnerability of AI itself to ethical abuse. Algorithmic bias is becoming one of the most significant obstacles to fairness and accountability, with numerous examples having been shown to, be in f ,act contributing to discrimination, no matter how skewed the dataset. 

There are many examples of these biases in the real world - from hiring tools that unintentionally favour certain demographics to predictive policing systems which target marginalised communities disproportionately. In order to address these issues, we must maintain an ethical approach to AI development that is anchored in transparency, accountability, and inclusive governance to ensure technology enhances human progress while not compromising fundamental freedoms. 

In the age of artificial intelligence, it is imperative tthat hatorganisationss strike a balance between innovation and responsibility, as AI redefines the digital frontier. As we move forward, not only will we need to strengthen technical infrastructure, but we will also need to shift the culture toward ethics, transparency, and continual oversight to achieve this.

Investing in a secure AI infrastructure, educating employees about responsible usage, and adopting frameworks that emphasise privacy and accountability are all important for businesses to succeed in today's market. As an enterprise, if security and ethics are incorporated into the foundation of AI strategies rather than treated as a side note, today's vulnerabilities can be turned into tomorrow's competitive advantage – driving intelligent and trustworthy advancement.
Read more »
healthcare data breach
Data Breach Data Exfilteration Data protection data security Healthcare Healthcare Breach Healthcare Data healthcare data breach

Conduent Healthcare Data Breach Exposes 10.5 Million Patient Records in Massive 2025 Cyber Incident

 

In what may become the largest healthcare breach of 2025, Conduent Business Solutions LLC disclosed a cyberattack that compromised the data of over 10.5 million patients. The breach, first discovered in January, affected major clients including Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana and Humana, among others. Although the incident has not yet appeared on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ HIPAA breach reporting website, Conduent confirmed the scale of the exposure in filings with federal regulators. 

The company reported to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in April that a “threat actor” gained unauthorized access to a portion of its network on January 13. The breach caused operational disruptions for several days, though systems were reportedly restored quickly. Conduent said the attack led to data exfiltration involving files connected to a limited number of its clients. Upon further forensic analysis, cybersecurity experts confirmed that these files contained sensitive personal and health information of millions of individuals. 

Affected data included patient names, treatment details, insurance information, and billing records. The company’s notification letters sent to Humana and Blue Cross customers revealed that the breach stemmed from Conduent’s third-party mailroom and printing services unit. Despite the massive scale, Conduent maintains that there is no evidence the stolen data has appeared on the dark web. 

Montana regulators recently launched an investigation into the breach, questioning why Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana took nearly ten months to notify affected individuals. Conduent, which provides business and government support services across 22 countries, reported approximately $25 million in direct response costs related to the incident during the second quarter of 2024. The company also confirmed that it holds cyber insurance coverage and has notified federal law enforcement. 

The Conduent breach underscores the growing risk of third-party vendor incidents in the healthcare sector. Experts note that even ancillary service providers like mailroom or billing vendors handle vast amounts of protected health information, making them prime targets for cybercriminals. Regulatory attorney Rachel Rose emphasized that all forms of protected health information (PHI)—digital or paper—fall under HIPAA’s privacy and security rules, requiring strict administrative and technical safeguards. 

Security consultant Wendell Bobst noted that healthcare organizations must improve vendor risk management programs by implementing continuous monitoring and stronger contractual protections. He recommended requiring certifications like HITRUST or FedRAMP for high-risk vendors and enforcing audit rights and breach response obligations. 

The incident follows last year’s record-breaking Change Healthcare ransomware attack, which exposed data from 193 million patients. While smaller in comparison, Conduent’s 10.5 million affected individuals highlight how interconnected the healthcare ecosystem has become—and how each vendor link in that chain poses a potential cybersecurity risk. As experts warn, healthcare organizations must tighten vendor oversight, ensure data minimization practices, and develop robust incident response playbooks to prevent the next large-scale PHI breach.
Read more »
Privacy Risks
Car Data Data collection Data Privacy Data protection Data Safety User Data data security Data Surveillance Mozilla Foundation Privacy Privacy Risks

Connected Car Privacy Risks: How Modern Vehicles Secretly Track and Sell Driver Data

 

The thrill of a smooth drive—the roar of the engine, the grip of the tires, and the comfort of a high-end cabin—often hides a quieter, more unsettling reality. Modern cars are no longer just machines; they’re data-collecting devices on wheels. While you enjoy the luxury and performance, your vehicle’s sensors silently record your weight, listen through cabin microphones, track your every route, and log detailed driving behavior. This constant surveillance has turned cars into one of the most privacy-invasive consumer products ever made. 

The Mozilla Foundation recently reviewed 25 major car brands and declared that modern vehicles are “the worst product category we have ever reviewed for privacy.” Not a single automaker met even basic standards for protecting user data. The organization found that cars collect massive amounts of information—from location and driving patterns to biometric data—often without explicit user consent or transparency about where that data ends up. 

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has already taken notice. The agency recently pursued General Motors (GM) and its subsidiary OnStar for collecting and selling drivers’ precise location and behavioral data without obtaining clear consent. Investigations revealed that data from vehicles could be gathered as frequently as every three seconds, offering an extraordinarily detailed picture of a driver’s habits, destinations, and lifestyle. 

That information doesn’t stay within the automaker’s servers. Instead, it’s often shared or sold to data brokers, insurers, and marketing agencies. Driver behavior, acceleration patterns, late-night trips, or frequent stops at specific locations could be used to adjust insurance premiums, evaluate credit risk, or profile consumers in ways few drivers fully understand. 

Inside the car, the illusion of comfort and control masks a network of tracking systems. Voice assistants that adjust your seat or temperature remember your commands. Smartphone apps that unlock the vehicle transmit telemetry data back to corporate servers. Even infotainment systems and microphones quietly collect information that could identify you and your routines. The same technology that powers convenience features also enables invasive data collection at an unprecedented scale. 

For consumers, awareness is the first defense. Before buying a new vehicle, it’s worth asking the dealer what kind of data the car collects and how it’s used. If they cannot answer directly, it’s a strong indication of a lack of transparency. After purchase, disabling unnecessary connectivity or data-sharing features can help protect privacy. Declining participation in “driver score” programs or telematics-based insurance offerings is another step toward reclaiming control. 

As automakers continue to blend luxury with technology, the line between innovation and intrusion grows thinner. Every drive leaves behind a digital footprint that tells a story—where you live, work, shop, and even who rides with you. The true cost of modern convenience isn’t just monetary—it’s the surrender of privacy. The quiet hum of the engine as you pull into your driveway should represent freedom, not another connection to a data-hungry network.
Read more »
data security flaws
Cloud Security Critical security flaw Customer Data Cyber Security Data protection data security data security flaws

Tata Motors Fixes Security Flaws That Exposed Sensitive Customer and Dealer Data

 

Indian automotive giant Tata Motors has addressed a series of major security vulnerabilities that exposed confidential internal data, including customer details, dealer information, and company reports. The flaws were discovered in the company’s E-Dukaan portal, an online platform used for purchasing spare parts for Tata commercial vehicles. 

According to security researcher Eaton Zveare, the exposed data included private customer information, confidential documents, and access credentials to Tata Motors’ cloud systems hosted on Amazon Web Services (AWS). Headquartered in Mumbai, Tata Motors is a key global player in the automobile industry, manufacturing passenger, commercial, and defense vehicles across 125 countries. 

Zveare revealed to TechCrunch that the E-Dukaan website’s source code contained AWS private keys that granted access to internal databases and cloud storage. These vulnerabilities exposed hundreds of thousands of invoices with sensitive customer data, including names, mailing addresses, and Permanent Account Numbers (PANs). Zveare said he avoided downloading large amounts of data “to prevent triggering alarms or causing additional costs for Tata Motors.” 

The researcher also uncovered MySQL database backups, Apache Parquet files containing private communications, and administrative credentials that allowed access to over 70 terabytes of data from Tata Motors’ FleetEdge fleet-tracking software. Further investigation revealed backdoor admin access to a Tableau analytics account that stored data on more than 8,000 users, including internal financial and performance reports, dealer scorecards, and dashboard metrics. 

Zveare added that the exposed credentials provided full administrative control, allowing anyone with access to modify or download the company’s internal data. Additionally, the vulnerabilities included API keys connected to Tata Motors’ fleet management system, Azuga, which operates the company’s test drive website. Zveare responsibly reported the flaws to Tata Motors through India’s national cybersecurity agency, CERT-In, in August 2023. 

The company acknowledged the findings in October 2023 and stated that it was addressing the AWS-related security loopholes. However, Tata Motors did not specify when all issues were fully resolved. In response to TechCrunch’s inquiry, Tata Motors confirmed that all reported vulnerabilities were fixed in 2023. 

However, the company declined to say whether it notified customers whose personal data was exposed. “We can confirm that the reported flaws and vulnerabilities were thoroughly reviewed following their identification in 2023 and were promptly and fully addressed,” said Tata Motors communications head, Sudeep Bhalla. “Our infrastructure is regularly audited by leading cybersecurity firms, and we maintain comprehensive access logs to monitor unauthorized activity. We also actively collaborate with industry experts and security researchers to strengthen our security posture.” 

The incident reveals the persistent risks of misconfigured cloud systems and exposed credentials in large enterprises. While Tata Motors acted swiftly after the report, cybersecurity experts emphasize that regular audits, strict access controls, and robust encryption are essential to prevent future breaches. 

As more automotive companies integrate digital platforms and connected systems into their operations, securing sensitive customer and dealer data remains a top priority.
Read more »
National Security
Artificial Intelligence Threats Cyber Defense Strategy Cyber Diplomacy Cyber Security Cybercrime Prevention Cybersecurity Data protection Digital Resilience Global Cyber Governance National Security

The Growing Role of Cybersecurity in Protecting Nations

 




It is becoming increasingly complex and volatile for nations to cope with the threat landscape facing them in an age when the boundaries between the digital and physical worlds are rapidly dissolving. Cyberattacks have evolved from isolated incidents of data theft to powerful instruments capable of undermining economies, destabilising governments and endangering the lives of civilians. 

It is no secret that the accelerating development of technologies, particularly generative artificial intelligence, has added an additional dimension to the problem at hand. A technology that was once hailed as a revolution in innovation and defence, GenAI has now turned into a double-edged sword.

It has armed malicious actors with the capability of automating large-scale attacks, crafting convincing phishing scams, generating convincing deepfakes, and developing adaptive malware that is capable of sneaking past conventional defences, thereby giving them an edge over conventional adversaries. 

Defenders are facing a growing set of mounting pressures as adversaries become increasingly sophisticated. There is an estimated global cybersecurity talent gap of between 2.8 and 4.8 million unfilled positions, putting nearly 70% of organisations at risk. Meanwhile, regulatory requirements, fragile supply chains, and an ever-increasing digital attack surface have compounded vulnerabilities across a broad range of industries. 

Geopolitics has added to the tensions against this backdrop, exacerbated by the ever-increasing threat of cybercrime. There is no longer much difference between espionage, sabotage, and warfare when it comes to state-sponsored cyber operations, which have transformed cyberspace into a crucial battleground for national power. 

It has been evident in recent weeks that digital offensives can now lead to the destruction of real-world infrastructure—undermining public trust, disrupting critical systems, and redefining the very concept of national security—as they have been used to attack Ukraine's infrastructure as well as campaigns aimed at crippling essential services around the globe. 

In India, there is an ambitious goal to develop a $1 trillion digital economy by the year 2025, and cybersecurity has quietly emerged as a key component of that transformation. In order to support the nation's digital expansion—which covers financial, commerce, healthcare, and governance—a fragile yet vital foundation of trust is being built on a foundation of cybersecurity, which has now become the scaffolding for this expansion. 

It has become more important than ever for enterprises to be capable of anticipating, detecting, and neutralising threats, as artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and data-driven systems are increasingly integrated into their operations. This ability is critical not only to their resilience but also to their long-term competitiveness. In addition to the increasing use of digital technologies, the complexity of safeguarding interconnected ecosystems has increased as well. 

During October's Cybersecurity Awareness Month 2025, a renewed focus has been placed on strengthening artificial intelligence-powered defences as well as encouraging collective security measures. As a senior director at Acuity Knowledge Partners, Sameer Goyal stated that India's financial and digital sectors are increasingly operating within an always-on, API-driven environment defined by instant payments, open platforms, and expanding integrations with third-party services—factors that inevitably widen the attack surface for hackers. He argued that security was not an optional provision; it was fundamental. 

Taking note of the rise in sophisticated threats such as account takeovers, API abuse, ransomware, and deepfake fraud, he indicated that security is not optional. According to him, the primary challenge of a company is to protect its customers' trust while still providing frictionless digital experiences. According to Goyal, forward-thinking organisations are focusing on three key strategic pillars to ensure their digital experiences are frictionless: adopting zero-trust architectures, leveraging artificial intelligence for threat detection, and incorporating secure-by-design principles into development processes. 

Despite this caution, he warned that technology alone cannot guarantee security. For true cyber readiness, employees should be well-informed, well-practised and well-rehearsed in incident response playbooks, as well as participate in proactive red-team and purple-team simulations. “Trust is our currency in today’s digital age,” he said. “By combining zero-trust frameworks with artificial intelligence-driven analytics, cybersecurity has become much more than compliance — it is becoming a crucial element of competitiveness.” 

Among the things that make cybersecurity an exceptionally intricate domain of diplomacy are its deep entanglement with nearly every dimension of international relations-economics, military, and human rights, to name a few. As a result of the interconnectedness of our society, data movement across borders has become as crucial to global commerce as capital and goods moving across borders. It is no longer just tariffs and market access that are at the centre of trade disputes. 

It is also about the issues of data localisation, encryption standards, and technology transfer policies that matter the most. While the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) sets an international standard for data protection, it has also become a focal point in a number of ongoing debates regarding digital sovereignty and cross-border data governance that have been ongoing for some time. 

 As far as defence and security are concerned, geopolitical stakes are of equal importance to those of air, land, and sea. Since NATO officially recognised cyberspace in 2016—as a distinct operational domain comparable with the other three domains—allies have expanded their collective security frameworks to include cyber defence. To ensure a rapid collective response to cyber incidents, nations share threat intelligence, conduct simulation exercises, and harmonise their policies in coordination with one another. 

The alliance still faces a dilemma which is very sensitive and unresolved to the point where determining the threshold at which a cyberattack would qualify as an act of aggression enough to trigger Article 5, which is the cornerstone of NATO's commitment to mutual defence. Cybersecurity has become inextricable from concerns about human rights and democracy as well, in addition to commerce and defence.

In recent years, authoritarian states have increasingly abused digital tools for spying on dissidents, manipulating public discourse, and undermining democratic institutions abroad. As a consequence of these actions, the global community has been forced to examine issues of accountability and ethical technology use. The diplomatic community struggles with the establishment of international norms for responsible behaviour in cyberspace while it must navigate profound disagreements over internet governance, censorship, and the delicate balancing act between national security and individuals' privacy through the process of developing ethical norms.

There is no doubt that the tensions around cybersecurity have emerged over time from merely being a technical issue to becoming one of the most consequential arenas in modern diplomacy-shaping not only international stability, but also the very principles that underpin global cooperation. Global cybersecurity leaders are facing an age of uncertainty in the face of a raging tide of digital threats to economies and societies around the world. 

Almost six in ten executives, according to the Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2025, feel that cybersecurity risks have intensified over the past year, with almost 60 per cent of them admitting that geopolitical tensions are directly influencing their defence strategies in the near future. According to the survey, one in three CEOs is most concerned about cyber espionage, data theft, and intellectual property loss, and another 45 per cent are concerned about disruption to their business operations. 

Even though cybersecurity has increasingly become a central component of corporate and national strategy, these findings underscore a broader truth: cybersecurity is no longer just for IT departments anymore. Experts point out that the threat landscape has become increasingly complex over the past few years, but generative artificial intelligence offers both a challenge and an opportunity as well. 

Several threat actors have learned to weaponise artificial intelligence so they can craft realistic deepfakes, automate phishing campaigns, and develop adaptive malware, but defenders are also utilising the same technology to enhance their resilience. The advent of AI-enabled security systems has revolutionised the way organisations anticipate and react to threats by analysing anomalies in real time, automating response cycles, and simulating complex attack vectors. 

It is important to note, however, that progress remains uneven, with large corporations and developed economies being able to deploy cutting-edge artificial intelligence defences, but smaller businesses and public institutions continue to suffer from outdated infrastructure and a lack of talented workers, which makes global cybersecurity preparedness a growing concern. However, several nations are taking proactive steps toward closing this gap.

An example is the United Arab Emirates, which embraces cybersecurity not just as a technology imperative but also as a societal responsibility. A National Cybersecurity Strategy for the UAE was unveiled in early 2025. It is based on five pillars — governance, protection, innovation, capacity building, and partnerships. It is structured around five core pillars. It was also a result of these efforts that the UAE Cybersecurity Council, in partnership with the Tawazun Council and Lockheed Martin, established a Cybersecurity Centre of Excellence, which would develop domestic expertise and align national capabilities with global standards.

As a result of its innovative Public-Private-People model, which combines school curricula with nationwide drill and strengthens coordination between government and private sector, the country can further embed cybersecurity awareness across society. As a result of this approach, a more general realisation is taking shape globally: cybersecurity should be enshrined in the fabric of national governance, not as a secondary item but as a fundamental aspect of national governance. If cyber resilience is to be reframed as a core component of national security, sustained investment in infrastructure, talent, and innovation is needed, as well as rigorous oversight at the board and policy levels. 

The plan calls for the establishment of red-team exercises, stress testing, and cross-border intelligence sharing to prevent local incidents from spiralling into systemic crises. The collective action taken by these institutions marks an important shift in global security thinking, a shift that recognises that an economy's vitality and geopolitical stability are inseparable from the resilience of a nation's digital infrastructure. 

In the era of global diplomacy, cybersecurity has grown to be a key component, but it is much more than just an administrative adjustment or a passing policy trend. In this sense, it indicates the acknowledgement that all of the world's security, economic stability, and individual rights are inextricably intertwined within the fabric of the internet and cyberspace that we live in today. 

Considering the sophistication and borderless nature of threats in today's world, the field of cyber diplomacy is becoming more and more important as a defining arena of global engagement as a result. As much as traditional forms of military and economic statecraft play a significant role in shaping global stability, the ability to foster cooperation, set shared norms, and resolve digital conflicts holds as much weight.

In the international community, the central question facing it is no longer whether the concept of cybersecurity deserves to be included in diplomatic dialogue, but rather how effectively global institutions can implement this recognition into tangible results in the future. To maintain peace in an era where the next global conflict could start with just one line of malicious code, it is becoming imperative to establish frameworks for responsible behaviour, enhance transparency, and strengthen crisis communications mechanisms. 

Quite frankly, the stakes are simply too high, as if they were not already high enough. Considering how easily a cyberattack can disrupt power grids, paralyse transportation systems, or compromise electoral integrity, diplomacy in the digital sphere has become crucial to the protection of international order, especially in a world where cyberattacks are a daily occurrence.

The cybersecurity diplomacy sector is now a cornerstone of 21st-century governance – vital to safeguarding the interests of not only national governments, but also the broader ideals of peace, prosperity, and freedom that are at the foundation of globalisation. During these times of technological change and geopolitical uncertainty, the reality of cyber security is undeniable — it is no longer a specialized field but rather a shared global responsibility that requires all nations, corporations, and individuals to embrace a mindset in which digital trust is seen as an investment in long-term prosperity, and cyber resilience is seen as a crucial part of enhancing long-term security. 

The building of this future will not only require advanced technologies but also collaboration between governments, industries, and academia to develop skilled professionals, standardise security frameworks, and create a transparent approach to threat intelligence exchange. For the digital order to remain secure and stable, it will be imperative to raise public awareness, develop ethical technology, and create stronger cross-border partnerships. 

Those countries that are able to embrace cybersecurity in governance, innovation, and education right now will define the next generation of global leaders. There will come a point in the future when the strength of digital economies will not depend merely on their innovation, but on the depth of the protection they provide, for the interconnected world ahead will demand a currency of security that will represent progress in the long run.
Read more »
user consent
AI Photo Scanning AI Surveillance Camera Roll Access Cybersecurity awareness Data protection Facebook Data Tracking Meta Privacy Concerns Privacy user consent

Users Warned to Check This Setting as Meta Faces Privacy Concerns

 


A new AI experiment launched by Meta Platforms Inc. continues to blur the lines between innovation and privacy in the rapidly evolving digital landscape of connectivity. There has been a report that the tech giant, well known for changing the way billions of people interact online, has begun testing an artificial intelligence-powered feature that will scan users' camera rolls to identify pictures and videos that are likely to be shared the most. 

By leveraging generative AI, this new Facebook feature will simplify the process of creating content and boosting user engagement by providing relevant images to users, applying creative edits, and assembling themed visual recaps - effectively turning users' own galleries into curated storyboards that tell a compelling story. 

Digital Trends reported recently that Meta has rolled out a feature for users in the United States and Canada that is currently opt-in and available on an opt-in basis. This is their latest attempt to keep pace with rivals like TikTok and Instagram in a tightening battle for attention. Apparently, the system analyses unshared media directly on the users' devices, identifying what the company refers to as "hidden gems," which would have otherwise remained undiscovered. 

As much as the feature is intended to promote more frequent and visually captivating posts through convenience, it also reignites long-standing discussions about data access, user consent, and the increasingly blurred line between personal privacy and algorithmic assistance that has become commonplace in the era of social media. During a move that has both sparked curiosity and unease, Meta quietly rolled out new Facebook settings that will allow the platform to analyse images stored within users' camera rolls-even those images that have never been uploaded or shared online—in a move that has sparked both intrigue and unease. 

With the advent of artificial intelligence, the feature is billed as “camera roll sharing suggestions,” which is intended to help people generate personalised recommendations such as travel highlights, thematic albums, and collages based on their private photos using the camera roll. According to Meta, the feature operates only with the consent of the user and is turned off by default, emphasising the user's complete control over whether or not he or she chooses to participate. Nevertheless, the emerging reports indicate a very different story. 

Many users claim that the feature is already active within their Facebook application despite having no memory of enabling it to begin with, indicating that it is an opt-in feature. It is for this reason that a growing number of people are starting to become sceptical of data permissions and privacy management, which has heightened ongoing concerns. As a result of these silent activations, there is still a broader issue at play-users might easily overlook background settings which grant extensive access to their personal information. 

The privacy advocacy community is therefore urging users to reexamine their Facebook privacy settings and to ensure their access to local photo libraries aligns with their expectations of digital privacy and comfort levels. By tapping Allow on a pop-up message labelled "cloud processing," Facebook users are in effect agreeing to Meta's AI Terms of Service, in which the platform will be able to analyse their stored media and even facial characteristics through artificial intelligence. 

After activating the feature, the user's camera roll will be continuously uploaded to Meta's cloud infrastructure, allowing Facebook to uncover so-called "hidden gems" within their photos, and select a collage, an AI-driven collage, a themed album, or create an edit tailored to individual moments. These settings were first introduced to select users as part of testing phases last summer, but they are now gradually appearing across the platform, hidden deep within the app's configuration menus under options such as "personalised creative ideas" and "AI-powered suggestions". 

According to Meta, the purpose of the tool is to improve the user experience by providing private, shareable recommendations of content based on the user's own device, all of which are created by Meta. Despite the fact that the company insists that the suggestions are only visible to those with an account, they are not used for targeted advertising. These suggestions are based on parameters such as time, location, and people or objects present. However, the quiet rollout has sparked the discomfort of some users who claim that they have never knowingly agreed to be notified about the service. 

There have been many reports of people finding the feature already activated, despite having no memory of granting consent, raising renewed concerns about transparency and informed user choice. Privacy advocates have said that although the tool may appear harmless and a simple way to simplify creative posting, it actually reveals a larger and more complex issue: the gradual normalisation of deep access to personal data under the guise of convenience, which has been occurring in recent years.

Keeping in mind the fact that Meta continues to expand its generative AI initiatives, the company's ability to mine personal images unposted for algorithmic insights enables Meta to pursue its technological ambitions in a way that often goes against the clear awareness of its users. Such features serve as a reminder of the delicate balance that exists between innovation and individual privacy in the digital age, as the race to dominate the AI ecosystem intensifies. 

In response to growing privacy concerns over Meta's data practices, many users are taking advantage of Meta's "Off-Facebook Activity" controls to limit the amount of personal information the company can collect and use beyond the platform's own application, as privacy concerns have intensified. In addition to being available on Facebook and Instagram, this feature allows users to view, manage, and delete the data that is shared with Meta by third-party services and websites. 

In the Facebook account's settings and privacy settings, users can select Off-Facebook Activity under "Your Facebook Information" so that they will be able to see what platforms have transmitted their data to, clear their history, and disable future tracking. Additionally, similar tools can be found under the Ads and Data & Privacy sections of Instagram under the Ads tab.

It is important to note that by disabling these options, Meta will not be able to store and analyse any activity that occurs outside of its ecosystem - ranging from e-commerce interactions to app usage patterns - reducing the personalisation of ads and limiting data flow between Meta and external platforms.

Despite the fact that the company maintains that this information assists in improving user experiences and providing relevant content, many critics believe that the practice violates one's privacy rights. Additionally, the controversy has reached the social media arena, where users continue to express their frustrations with Meta's pervasive tracking systems. In one viral TikTok video that has accumulated over half a million views, the creator described disabling the feature as a "small act of defiance," encouraging others to do the same to reclaim control of their digital footprint. 

While experts are warning that, despite the fact that Meta remains able to function properly, certain permissions needed for its functionality remain active, which means that complete data isolation remains elusive even after turning off tracking. However, privacy advocates assert that clearing off-Facebook Activity and preventing future tracking remain among the most effective methods users can use to significantly reduce Meta's access to their personal information. 

Despite growing concerns that Meta is utilising personal data in an increasingly expansive way in an effort to protect it, companies like Proton are positioning themselves as secure alternatives to Meta that emphasise transparency and user control. In response to the recent controversy over Meta's smart glasses - criticised for the potential to be turned into facial recognition and surveillance tools - calls have become more urgent for stronger safeguards against the abuse of private media. 

Unlike many of its peers, Proton advocates a fundamentally different approach: limiting data collection completely rather than attempting to manage it after it has been exposed. With Proton Drive, a cloud-based storage service that is encrypted, users can securely store their camera rolls and private folders without being concerned about third parties accessing them or harvesting their data. Regardless of the size of each file, including its metadata, all files are encrypted end-to-end, so that no one - not even Proton - can access or analyse the content of users. 

By encrypting photographs, people prevent the extraction of sensitive data, such as geolocation information and patterns, that can reveal personal routines and locations, through this level of security. With Proton Drive, users can store and retrieve their files anywhere using an app for both iOS and Android. Furthermore, users can control their privacy completely with a mobile app for both iOS and Android. In contrast to the majority of social media and tech platforms that monetise user data for advertising or model training, Proton's business model is entirely subscription-based, which eliminates the temptation to exploit the personal data of users. 

A five-gigabyte storage allowance is currently offered by the company, which is enough for about 1,000 high-resolution images, so that users are encouraged to safeguard their digital memories through a platform that prioritises confidentiality over commercialisation. Advocates for privacy are considering this model as a viable option in an era where technology is increasingly clashing with the right to personal security, a conflict that is becoming more prevalent. 

With the advancement of the digital age, the line between personalisation and intrusion becomes increasingly blurred, encouraging users to take an active role in managing their own data. The ongoing issues surrounding Meta's use of artificial intelligence to analyse photos, off-platform tracking, and secret data collection serve as a stark reminder that convenience is not always accompanied by privacy concerns. 

According to experts, reviewing app permissions, clearing connected data histories on a regular basis, and disabling non-essential tracking features can all help to significantly reduce the amount of unnecessary data exposed to the outside world. In addition, storing sensitive information in an encrypted cloud service like Proton Drive can also offer a safer environment while maintaining access to sensitive information. 

The power to safeguard our online privacy lies with the ability to be aware and act upon it. By remaining informed about new app settings, by reading consent disclosures carefully, and by being selective about the permissions users grant, every individual can regain control of their digital lives.

As artificial intelligence continues to redefine the limits of technology in our age, securing personal information has become more than a matter of protecting oneself from identity theft; it has become a form of digital self-defence that ensures users can remain innovative and preserve their basic right to privacy at the same time.
Read more »
Workforce Automation
Cloud Security Compliance Management Cybersecurity Data protection Digital Transformation Hybrid Work Network Safety Remote Work Technology Workforce Automation

Smart Devices Redefining Productivity in the Home Workspace


 

Remote working, once regarded as a rare privilege, has now become a key feature of today's professional landscape. Boardroom discussions and water-cooler chats have become much more obsolete, as organisations around the world continue to adapt to new work models shaped by technology and necessity, with virtual meetings and digital collaboration becoming more prevalent. 

It has become increasingly apparent that remote work is no longer a distant future vision but rather a reality that defines the professional world of today. There have been significant shifts in the way that organisations operate and how professionals communicate, perform and interact as a result of the dissolution of traditional workplace boundaries, giving rise to a new era of distributed teams, flexible schedules, and technology-driven collaboration. 

These changes, accelerated by global disruptions and evolving employee expectations, have led to a significant shift in the way organisations operate. Gallup has recently announced that over half of U.S. employees now work from home at least part of the time, a trend that is unlikely to wane anytime soon. There are countless reasons why this model is so popular, including its balance between productivity, autonomy, and accessibility, offering both employers and employees the option of redefining success in a way that goes beyond the confines of physical work environments. 

With the increasing popularity of remote and hybrid work, it is becoming ever more crucial for individuals to learn how to thrive in this environment, in which success increasingly depends on the choice and use of the right digital tools that will make it possible for them to maintain connection, efficiency, and growth in a borderless work environment. 

DigitalOcean Currents report from 2023 indicates that 39 per cent of companies operating entirely remotely now operate, while 23 per cent use a hybrid model with mandatory in-office days, and 2 per cent permit their employees to choose between remote working options. In contrast, about 14 per cent of these companies still maintain the traditional setup of an office, a small fraction of which is the traditional office setup. 

More than a location change, this dramatic shift marks the beginning of a transformation of how teams communicate, innovate, and remain connected across time zones and borders, which reflects an evolution in how teams communicate, innovate, and remain connected. With the blurring of the boundaries of the workplace, digital tools have been emerging as the backbone of this transformation, providing seamless collaboration between employees, ensuring organisational cohesion, and maximising productivity regardless of where they log in to the workplace. 

With today's distributed work culture, success depends not only on adaptability, but also on thoughtfully integrating technology that bridges distances with efficiency and purpose, in an era where flexibility is imperative, but it also depends on technology integration. As organisations continue to embrace remote and hybrid working models, maintaining compliance across diverse sites has become one of the most pressing operational challenges that organisations face today. 

Compliance management on a manual basis not only strains administrative efficiency but also exposes businesses to significant regulatory and financial risks. Human error remains an issue that persists today—whether it is overlooking state-specific labour laws, understating employees' hours, or misclassifying workers, with each mistake carrying a potential for fines, back taxes, or legal disputes as a result. In the absence of centralised systems, routine audits become time-consuming exercises that are plagued by inconsistent data and dispersed records. 

Almost all human resource departments face the challenge of ensuring that fair and consistent policy enforcement across dispersed teams is nearly impossible because of fragmented oversight and self-reported data. For organisations to overcome these challenges, automation and intelligent workforce management are increasingly being embraced by forward-looking organisations. Using advanced time-tracking platforms along with workforce analytics, employers can gain real-time visibility into employee activity, simplify audits, and improve compliance reporting accuracy. 

Businesses can not only reduce risks and administrative burdens by consolidating processes into a single, data-driven system but also increase employee transparency and trust by integrating these processes into one system. By utilising technology to manage remote teams effectively in the era of remote work, it becomes a strategic ally for maintaining operational integrity. 

Clear communication, structured organisation, and the appropriate technology must be employed when managing remote teams. When managing for the first time, defining roles, reporting procedures, and meeting schedules is an essential component of creating accountability and transparency among managers. 

Regular one-on-one and team meetings are essential for engaging employees and addressing challenges that might arise in a virtual environment. The adoption of remote work tools for collaboration, project tracking, and communication is on the rise among organisations as a means of streamlining workflows across time zones to ensure teams remain in alignment. Remote work has been growing in popularity because of its tangible benefits. 

Employees and businesses alike will save money on commuting, infrastructure, and operational expenses when using it. There is no need for daily travel, so professionals can devote more time to their families and themselves, enhancing work-life balance. Research has shown that remote workers usually have a higher level of productivity due to fewer interruptions and greater flexibility, and that they often log more productive hours. Additionally, this model has gained recognition for its ability to improve employee satisfaction as well as promote a healthy lifestyle. 

By utilising the latest developments in technology, such as real-time collaborations and secure data sharing, remote work continues to reshape traditional employment and is enabling an efficient, balanced, and globally connected workforce to be created. 

Building the Foundation for Remote Work Efficiency 


In today's increasingly digital business environment, making the right choice in terms of the hardware that employees use forms the cornerstone of an effective remote working environment. It will often make or break a company's productivity levels, communication performance, and overall employee satisfaction. Remote teams must be connected directly with each other using powerful laptops, seamless collaboration tools, and reliable devices that ensure that remote operations run smoothly. 

High-Performance Laptops for Modern Professionals 


Despite the fact that laptops remain the primary work instruments for remote employees, their specifications can have a significant impact on their efficiency levels during the course of the day. In addition to offering optimum performance, HP Elite Dragonfly, HP ZBook Studio, and HP Pavilion x360 are also equipped with versatile capabilities that appeal to business leaders as well as creative professionals alike. 

As the world continues to evolve, key features, such as 16GB or more RAM, the latest processors, high-quality webcams, high-quality microphones, and extended battery life, are no longer luxuries but rather necessities to keep professionals up-to-date in a virtual environment. Furthermore, enhanced security features as well as multiple connectivity ports make it possible for remote professionals to remain both productive and protected at the same time. 

Desktop Systems for Dedicated Home Offices


Professionals working from a fixed workspace can benefit greatly from desktop systems, as they offer superior performance and long-term value. HP Desktops are a great example of desktop computers that provide enterprise-grade computing power, better thermal management, and improved ergonomics. 

They are ideal for complex, resource-intensive tasks due to their flexibility, the ability to support multiple monitors, and their cost-effectiveness, which makes them a solid foundation for sustained productivity. 

Essential Peripherals and Accessories 


The entire remote setup does not only require core computing devices to be integrated, but it also requires thoughtfully integrating peripherals designed to increase productivity and comfort. High-resolution displays, such as HP's E27u G4 and HP's P24h G4, or high-resolution 4K displays, significantly improve eye strain and improve workflow. For professionals who spend long periods of time in front of screens, it is essential that they have monitors that are ergonomically adjustable, colour accurate, and have blue-light filtering. 

With reliable printing options such as HP OfficeJet Pro 9135e, LaserJet Pro 4001dn, and ENVY Inspire 7255e, home offices can manage their documents seamlessly. There is also the possibility of avoiding laptop overheating by using cooling pads, ergonomic stands, and proper maintenance tools, such as microfiber cloths and compressed air, which help maintain performance and equipment longevity. 

Data Management and Security Solutions 


It is crucial to understand that efficient data management is the key to remote productivity. Professionals utilise high-capacity flash drives, external SSDs, and secure cloud services to safeguard and manage their files. A number of tools and memory upgrades have improved the performance of workstations, making it possible to perform multiple tasks smoothly and retrieve data more quickly. 

Nevertheless, organisations are prioritising security measures like VPNs, encrypted communication and two-factor authentication in an effort to mitigate risks associated with remote connectivity, and in order to do so, they are investing more in these measures. 

Software Ecosystem for Seamless Collaboration  


There are several leading project management platforms in the world that facilitate coordinated workflows by offering features like task tracking, automated progress reports, and shared workspaces, which provide a framework for remote work. Although hardware creates the framework, software is the heart and soul of the remote work ecosystem. 

Numerous communication tools enable geographically dispersed teams to work together via instant messaging, video conferencing, and real-time collaboration, such as Microsoft Teams, Slack, Zoom, and Google Meet. Secure cloud solutions, including Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Dropbox and Box, further simplify the process of sharing files while maintaining enterprise-grade security. 

Managing Distributed Teams Effectively 


A successful remote leadership experience cannot be achieved solely by technology; a successful remote management environment requires sound management practices that are consistent with clear communication protocols, defined performance metrics, and regular virtual check-ins. Through fostering collaboration, encouraging work-life balance, and integrating virtual team-building initiatives, distributed teams can build stronger relationships. 

The combination of these practices, along with continuous security audits and employee training, ensures that organisations keep not only their operational efficiency, but also trust and cohesion within their organisations, especially in an increasingly decentralised world in which organisations are facing increasing competition. It seems that the future of work depends on how organisations can seamlessly integrate technology into their day-to-day operations as the digital landscape continues to evolve. 

Smart devices, intelligent software, and connected ecosystems are no longer optional, they are the lifelines of modern productivity and are no longer optional. The purchase of high-quality hardware and reliable digital tools by remote professionals goes beyond mere convenience; it is a strategic step towards sustaining focus, creativity, and collaboration in an ever-changing environment by remote professionals.

Leadership, on the other hand, must always maintain trust, engagement, and a positive mental environment within their teams to maximise their performance. Remote working will continue to grow in popularity as the next phase of success lies in striking a balance between technology and human connection, efficiency and empathy, flexibility and accountability, and innovation potential. 

With the advancement of digital infrastructure and the adoption of smarter, more adaptive workflows by organisations across the globe, we are on the verge of an innovative, resilient, and inclusive future for the global workforce. This future will not be shaped by geographical location, but rather by the intelligent use of tools that will enable people to perform at their best regardless of their location.
Read more »
Password Privacy
Cyber Defenses cyberattack protection Data protection data security IP Address ISP NordVPN Online Privacy Password Privacy

Using a VPN Is Essential for Online Privacy and Data Protection

 

Virtual Private Networks, or VPNs, have evolved from tools used to bypass geographic content restrictions into one of the most effective defenses for protecting digital privacy and data security. By encrypting your internet traffic and concealing your real IP address, VPNs make it far more difficult for anyone — from hackers to internet service providers (ISPs) — to monitor or intercept your online activity. 

When connected to a VPN, your data is sent through a secure, encrypted tunnel before reaching its destination. This means that any information transmitted between your device and the VPN server remains unreadable to outsiders. Once your data reaches the server, it’s decrypted and forwarded to the intended website or application. In return, the response is re-encrypted before traveling back to you. Essentially, your data is “cloaked” from potential attackers, making it especially valuable when using public Wi-Fi networks, where Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks such as IP spoofing or Wi-Fi eavesdropping are common. 

For businesses, combining VPN usage with endpoint security and antivirus software strengthens overall cybersecurity posture by reducing exposure to network vulnerabilities.

A key advantage of VPNs lies in hiding your IP address, which can otherwise reveal your geographic location and online behavior. Exposing your IP makes you vulnerable to phishing, hacking, and DDoS attacks, and it can even allow malicious actors to impersonate you online. By rerouting your connection through a VPN server, your actual IP is replaced by the server’s, ensuring that websites and external entities can’t trace your real identity or location. 

In addition to safeguarding data, VPNs also help counter ISP throttling — the practice of deliberately slowing internet connections during high-traffic periods or after reaching data caps. With a VPN, your ISP cannot see the exact nature of your online activities, whether streaming, gaming, or torrenting. While ISPs can still detect VPN usage and measure total data transferred, they lose visibility into your specific browsing habits. 

Without a VPN, ISPs can track every website you visit, your search history, and even personal information transmitted over unencrypted connections. This data can be sold to advertisers or used to create detailed user profiles. Even browsing in Incognito mode doesn’t prevent ISPs from seeing your activity — it merely stops your device from saving it locally. 

Beyond using a VPN, good cyber hygiene is crucial. Keep your software and devices updated, use strong passwords, and enable antivirus protection. Avoid sharing unnecessary personal data online and think twice before storing sensitive information on unsecured platforms.  

Ultimately, a VPN isn’t a luxury — it’s a fundamental privacy tool. It protects your data, masks your identity, and keeps your online behavior hidden from prying eyes. In an era of widespread tracking and data monetization, using a VPN is one of the simplest and most effective ways to reclaim your digital privacy.
Read more »
VMO Incident
cyber resilience Cybersecurity Breach Data Privacy Data protection Digital Infrastructure Hong Kong Security Network Security Privacy Ransomware attack VMO Incident

Mobdro Pro VPN Under Fire for Compromising User Privacy

 


A disturbing revelation that highlights the persistent threat that malicious software poses to Android users has been brought to the attention of cybersecurity researchers, who have raised concerns over a deceptive application masquerading as a legitimate streaming and VPN application. Despite the app's promise that it offers free access to online television channels and virtual private networking features—as well as the name Modpro IPTV Plus VPN—it hides a much more dangerous purpose.

It is known as Mobdro Pro IPTV Plus VPN. Cleafy conducted an in-depth analysis of this software program and found that, as well as functioning as a sophisticated Trojan horse laced with Klopatra malware, it is also able to compromise users' financial data, infiltrating devices, securing remote controls, and infecting devices with Klopatra malware. 

Even though it is not listed in Google Play, it has spread through sideloaded installations that appeal to users with the lure of free services, causing users to download it. There is a serious concern among experts that those who install this app may unknowingly expose their devices, bank accounts, and other financial assets to severe security risks. At first glance, the application appears to be an enticing gateway to free, high-quality IPTV channels and VPN services, and many Android users find the offer hard to refuse. 

It is important to note, however, that beneath its polished interface lies a sophisticated banking Trojan with a remote-access toolkit that allows cybercriminals to control almost completely infected devices through a remote access toolkit. When the malware was installed on the device, Klopatra, the malware, exploiting Android's accessibility features, impersonated the user and accessed banking apps, which allowed for the malicious activity to go unnoticed.

Analysts have described the infection chain in a way that is both deliberate and deceptive, using social engineering techniques to deceive users into downloading an app from an unverified source, resulting in a sideload process of the app. Once installed, what appears to be a harmless setup process is, in fact, a mechanism to give the attacker full control of the system. 

In analyzing Mobdro Pro IPTV Plus VPN further, the researchers have discovered that it has been misusing the popularity of the once popular streaming service Mobdro (previously taken down by Spanish authorities) to mislead users and gain credibility, by using the reputation of the once popular streaming service Mobdro. 

There are over 3,000 Android devices that have already been compromised by Klopatra malware, most of which have been in Italy and Spain regions, according to Cleafy, and the operation was attributed to a Turkish-based threat group. A group of hackers continue to refine their tactics and exploit public frustration with content restrictions and digital surveillance by using trending services, such as free VPNs and IPTV apps. 

The findings of Cleafy are supported by Kaspersky's note that there is a broader trend of malicious VPN services masquerading as legitimate tools. For example, there are apps such as MaskVPN, PaladinVPN, ShineVPN, ShieldVPN, DewVPN, and ProxyGate previously linked to similar attacks. In an effort to safeguard privacy and circumvent geo-restrictions online, the popularity of Klopatra may inspire an uproar among imitators, making it more critical than ever for users to verify the legitimacy of free VPNs and streaming apps before installing them. Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) have been portrayed for some time as a vital tool for safeguarding privacy and circumventing geo-restrictions. 

There are millions of internet users around the world who use them as a way to protect themselves from online threats — masking their IP addresses, encrypting their data traffic, and making sure their intercepted communications remain unreadable. But security experts are warning that this perception of safety can sometimes be false.

In recent years, it has become increasingly difficult to select a trustworthy VPN, even when downloading it directly from official sites, such as the Google Play Store, since many apps are allegedly compromising the very privacy they claim to protect, which has made the selection process increasingly difficult. In the VPN Transparency Report 2025, published by the Open Technology Fund, significant security and transparency issues were highlighted among several VPN applications that are widely used around the world. 

During the study, 32 major VPN services collectively used by over a billion people were examined, and the findings revealed opaque ownership structures, questionable operational practices, and the misuse of insecure tunnelling technologies. Several VPN services, which boasted over 100 million downloads each, were flagged as particularly worrying, including Turbo VPN, VPN Proxy Master, XY VPN, and 3X VPN – Smooth Browsing. 

Several providers utilised the Shadowsocks tunnelling protocol, which was never intended to be private or confidential, and yet was marketed as a secure VPN solution by researchers. It emphasises the importance of doing users' due diligence before choosing a VPN provider, urging users to understand who operates the service, how it is designed, and how their information is handled before making a decision. 

It is also strongly advised by cybersecurity experts to have cautious digital habits, including downloading apps from verified sources, carefully reviewing permission requests, installing up-to-date antivirus software, and staying informed on the latest cybersecurity developments through trusted cybersecurity publications. As malicious VPNs and fake streaming platforms become increasingly important gateways to malware such as Klopatra, awareness and vigilance have become increasingly important defensive tools in the rapidly evolving online security landscape. 

As Clearafy uncovered in its analysis of the Klopatra malware, the malware represents a new level of sophistication in Android cyberattacks, utilising several sophisticated mechanisms to help evade detection and resist reverse engineering. As opposed to typical smartphone malware, Klopatra permits its operators to fully control an infected device remotely—essentially enabling them to do whatever the legitimate user is able to do on the device. 

It has a hidden VNC mode, which allows attackers to access the device while keeping the screen black, making them completely unaware of any active activities going on in the device. This is one of the most insidious features of this malware. If malicious actors have access to such a level of access, they could open banking applications without any visible signs of compromise, initiate transfers, and manipulate device settings without anyone noticing.

A malware like Klopatra has strong defensive capabilities that make it very resilient. It maintains an internal watchlist of popular Android security applications and automatically attempts to uninstall them once it detects them, ensuring that it stays hidden from its victim. Whenever a victim attempts to uninstall a malicious application manually, they may be forced to trigger the system's "back" action, which prevents them from doing so. 

The code analysis and internal operator comments—primarily written in Turkish—led investigators to trace the malware’s origins to a coordinated threat group based in Turkey, where most of their activities were directed towards targeting Italian and Spanish financial institutions. Cleafy's findings also revealed that the third server infrastructure is carrying out test campaigns in other countries, indicating an expansion of the business into other countries in the future. 

With Klopatra, users can launch legitimate financial apps and a convincing fake login screen is presented to them. The screen gives the user the appearance of a legitimate login page, securing their credentials via direct operator intervention. The campaign evolved from a prototype created in early 2025 to its current advanced form in 2035. This information is collected and then used by the attackers in order to access accounts, often during the night when the device is idle, making suspicions less likely. 

A few documented examples illustrate that operators have left internal notes in the app's code in reference to failed transactions and victims' unlock patterns, which highlights the hands-on nature of these attacks. Cybersecurity experts warn that the best defence against malware is prevention - avoiding downloading apps from unverified sources, especially those that offer free IPTV or VPN services. Although Google Play Protect is able to identify and block many threats, it cannot detect every emerging threat. 

Whenever an app asks for deep system permissions or attempts to install secondary software, users are advised to be extremely cautious. According to Cleafy's research, curiosity about "free" streaming services or privacy services can all too easily serve as a gateway for full-scale digital compromise, so consumers need to be vigilant about these practices. In a time when convenience usually outweighs caution, threats such as Klopatra are becoming increasingly sophisticated.

A growing number of cybercriminals are exploiting popular trends such as free streaming and VPN services to ensnare unsuspecting users into ensnaring them. As a result, it is becoming increasingly essential for each individual to take steps to protect themselves. Experts recommend that users adopt a multi-layered security approach – pairing a trusted VPN with an anti-malware tool and enabling multi-factor authentication on their financial accounts to minimise damage should their account be compromised. 

The regular review of system activity and app permissions can also assist in detecting anomalies before they occur. Additionally, users should cultivate a sense of scepticism when it comes to offers that seem too good to be true, particularly when they promise unrestricted access and “premium” services without charge. In addition, organisations need to increase awareness campaigns so consumers are able to recognise the warning signs of fraudulent apps. 

The cybersecurity incidents serve as a reminder that cybersecurity is not a one-time safeguard, but must remain constant through vigilance and informed decisions throughout the evolving field of mobile security. Awareness of threats remains the first and most formidable line of defence as the mobile security battlefield continues to evolve.
Read more »
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)