Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Showing posts with label Camera Survellience. Show all posts

Private Operators to Manage Mobile Speed Cameras in New Zealand

 

In a significant shift, New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA) has opened a tender to hand over the management of the country's 45 mobile speed cameras to private operators from next year. This move, the first of its kind, is part of a broader initiative to revamp the nation's traffic enforcement strategy. 

Unlike the traditional setup where police issue speeding tickets, the winning private operator will not be responsible for penalizing drivers or receiving bonuses based on the number of violations. Instead, NZTA will retain control over processing images, issuing fines, and determining the placement of cameras. 

The tender emphasizes that the chosen provider must demonstrate the ability to meet evolving requirements, potentially including point-to-point mobile operations. This initiative aligns with NZTA's broader plan to take over all mobile and fixed speed cameras from the police by July 2025, with an additional 50 fixed cameras slated to be added soon. While the overall goal remains focused on enhancing road safety, the private operators will not receive any funds from mobile cameras. 

All fees collected will contribute to the Government consolidated fund. The tender specifically addresses spot speed tickets, emphasizing the use of unbranded vehicles and staff from the private company. Internationally, the involvement of third-party operators in delivering roadside mobile camera operations is a well-established practice, according to NZTA. 

The move aims to leverage private expertise for more efficient operations. The footage captured by these mobile cameras will be transmitted to data centres in Sydney, run by Amazon Web Services and Microsoft, and retained for 30 days while NZTA assesses it. However, the agency has been cautioned to manage risks concerning public trust and confidence in the system, highlighting the importance of safeguarding personal data. 

A noteworthy aspect of the tender is its potential expansion beyond speed-limit breaches. Bidders are expected to showcase capabilities in detecting individuals without seatbelts and drivers using mobile phones. The winning bidder must also have a proven track record in a comparable market, such as Australia, Europe, or the US, and be ready to set up operations in New Zealand by January. 

While the tender places a small weight on broader benefits, such as job creation in New Zealand, it underscores the need for a high degree of evidential accuracy, assurance, and effective cybersecurity. The selected provider will undergo monitoring and auditing, with a focus on ensuring the safety of mobile camera operators. 

This signifies a strategic shift in New Zealand's approach to traffic enforcement, emphasizing efficiency, technological advancements, and a collaborative effort between public and private entities. As the country looks to modernize its traffic management systems, this development could set a precedent for similar initiatives globally.

‘Elon Musk’ Book Reveals: Musk Wanted to use Tesla Cameras to Surveille on Drivers


A recently published biography of Elon Musk by Walter Isaacson has revealed some interesting facts about Tesla, a popular revelation being the company’s approach to privacy and its rather controversial idea regarding an internal monitoring camera installed in their cars. 

It has been confirmed in the biography that Twitter’s CEO once suggested Tesla record video of drivers' on-wheel behaviour using the internal monitoring camera. His asserted goal was to use the footage as proof to shield Tesla from inquiries in the event of a crash. 

The book ‘Elon Musk’ stated that Elon Musk pushed for the usage of the internal monitoring camera to record footage of Tesla drivers at first without their awareness with the intention of using the footage as proof in investigations linked to the Autopilot ADAS. 

According to an excerpt from the book, Musk was convinced that one of the main reasons for accidents was bad drivers and not bad software. "At one meeting, he suggested using data collected from the car's cameras – one of which is inside the car and focused on the driver – to prove when there was driver error," the excerpt read.

However, several privacy concerns were raised, one of them being a woman citing legal assistance from the corporation and privacy concerns about the fact that Tesla could not link the selfie streams to specific vehicles, even if they were involved in accidents.

Apparently, Musk was not happy with the answer as according to Isaacson, the "concept of 'privacy teams' did not warm his heart[…]I am the decision-maker at this company, not the privacy team. I don't even know who they are. They are so private you never know who they are," Musk said during their meeting.

Musk then recommended that a pop-up could be used instead to tell people that if they used Full Self-Driving Beta, Tesla would collect data in the event of a crash. The woman nodded, noting that "as long as we are communicating it to customers, I think we're okay with that." The exchange is quite telling of the way Elon Musk runs his companies, and also of his stance on privacy.

The pop-ups are currently a feature in Tesla vehicles, where the company will use the data from internal cameras and notifications will be provided to the users with an option to either agree or disagree with Tesla in collecting their cabin camera data. It is important to note that Tesla has not yet used inside photos of cars to defend itself in court cases or government inquiries involving the Autopilot system.

Currently, Tesla is facing a class action lawsuit in terms of video privacy, following allegations that groups of Tesla employees privately share invasive videos and images, that were the recordings of customers’ car cameras between 2019 and 2022. Another lawsuit was filed in Illinois that focused particularly on the cabin camera.  

Hidden Camera Invasion Alert: Holiday Rentals Discovered with a Disturbing Surge

 


Recently, it was found that one out of 10 owners of holiday rental properties install hidden cameras or microphones within their properties. This is when they are rented out on sites such as Airbnb. It is believed that seven out of ten hosts had a security camera in their bedroom, according to the survey. This horrifying breach of privacy was justified by landlords as an attempt to discover foul behavior among their guests. This was to catch them before they damaged anything. 

60% of Americans are concerned about hidden cameras in Airbnb houses in 2019, according to the latest survey. One in ten vacation home residents, according to a survey by real estate investment company IPX1031, said they discovered a hidden camera during their stay at the property. 

In recent years, vacation home rentals have become an increasingly popular form of lodging - made popular by platforms like Airbnb that have racked up multi-million dollar valuations - and have opened up new opportunities for travelers seeking unique experiences as well as for hustle hosts looking for a second income. 

There might be a hidden surveillance secret on these vacation rentals that might make them seem like a quick, easy, and cost-effective holiday win, but there could be an even more eerie aspect to the victim's next vacation rental that he/she might not have anticipated. 

In a survey of 34 hosts, 36 percent indicated that disorderly guest behavior has led them to enhance their properties with safety precautions. Vivint, a company that conducts tenant screening, says that over half of its hosts surveyed have reported rental homes vandalized by guests, 50 percent have suffered property damage, and 47 percent believe they have been victimized by thieves. 

A Vivint poll conducted earlier this year found that the majority of guests felt this was a serious violation of their privacy. Approximately 76 percent of the guests who stayed in holiday rentals in the study said that such surveillance deters them. This deters them from staying there again.

Based on a survey of 406 hosts and 602 guests, the study found a profound divide between what both groups considered acceptable in accommodation accommodations. It is also Airbnb's own rules that any security cameras and other recording devices are present inside or around a listing, regardless of whether they're operating or connected, and hosts have a responsibility to inform guests about the presence of such devices.

It is no secret that spy cameras have been a problem for quite some time. A recent report from Human Rights Watch, a New York-based non-profit organization dedicated to human rights, reports that there have been over 30,000 cases of filming by hidden cameras in South Korea between 2013 and 2018. 

According to Kenneth Bombace, CEO of the intelligence firm Global Threat Solutions, the number of reports involving hidden spy cameras has proliferated because of the ease of access and affordability of such devices, combined with the public's increasing ability to detect such devices. This study has revealed some unsettling revelations, including that one in ten of the rental hosts admitted to having hidden cameras or microphones hidden in their properties, without the knowledge of their guests, which is completely out of character. 

It is quite clear that 86% of those interviewed thought this was a massive intrusion into their personal space. This is quite justified given that it represents a breach of privacy for travelers. According to the study, almost three-quarters (76%) of people who stayed in a vacation rental for the night felt that such surveillance was enough to make them more reluctant to return. 

The study also revealed the grim reality of the types of damage guests cause to rental properties as a result of their actions. It is estimated that 40% of hosts have taken care of damages caused by their guests, with 23% of hosts suspecting that the damages were a deliberate act. 

There were USD 553 in damages per home, creating a significant financial burden for house owners, who now face multiple repair expenses. The majority of rental hosts have responded to these concerns by screening prospective guests via their social media profiles before allowing them to book their property, identifying guests who may prove problematic in the future. 

Furthermore, the study examined how rental hosts' perceptions of guest behavior differ from those of the guests themselves. In the survey, it was discovered that families ranked the highest in terms of potential guests, whereas groups of young people were rated lowest in terms of potential guests. 

Investing in the following security measures is an important way for hosts to keep their homes safe from troublesome children: alarm systems, regular inspections of the property, and motion-activated locks that help secure their properties. Nevertheless, such measures are not free, with hosts spending an average of USD 1,427 each year on property security. 

With summer in full swing across North America and Europe, this study's findings raise pertinent questions about the balance within the vacation rental industry between privacy and security. This is because people rent places during the summer. 

While hosts strive to protect their properties and ensure guests are safe, hidden cameras and microphones pose a serious threat to privacy infringements. This leads many to worry about how hosts protect their properties and provide a safe environment. 

Victims sympathize with the host who has to pay for damages. However, they want people to understand that many of them do this as a business, which can be quite lucrative for them. Victims' financial concerns should remain limited if they own properties they can rent. 

The key to a successful relationship between hosts and guests is a good understanding of how to communicate and be transparent. Harmonious experiences can be achieved by developing trust and respecting the boundaries of the victim's coworkers. As a result, both hosts and guests will be able to take advantage of the benefits of the booming vacation rental industry without having to compromise the level of privacy or security they are seeking from the experience. 

There is a growing need for all stakeholders to come together to find a middle ground to find a solution to this growing issue as the vacation rental market continues to grow. Keeping cameras out of bloody bedrooms sends the message that everyone involved is striving for trust, respect, and a positive experience.