Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

About Me

Showing posts with label Cloning. Show all posts

How Scammers Use Deepfakes in Financial Fraud and Ways to Stay Protected

 

Deepfake technology, developed through artificial intelligence, has advanced to the point where it can convincingly replicate human voices, facial expressions, and subtle movements. While once regarded as a novelty for entertainment or social media, it has now become a dangerous tool for cybercriminals. In the financial world, deepfakes are being used in increasingly sophisticated ways to deceive institutions and individuals, creating scenarios where it becomes nearly impossible to distinguish between genuine interactions and fraudulent attempts. This makes financial fraud more convincing and therefore more difficult to prevent. 

One of the most troubling ways scammers exploit this technology is through face-swapping. With many banks now relying on video calls for identity verification, criminals can deploy deepfake videos to impersonate real customers. By doing so, they can bypass security checks and gain unauthorized access to accounts or approve financial decisions on behalf of unsuspecting individuals. The realism of these synthetic videos makes them difficult to detect in real time, giving fraudsters a significant advantage. 

Another major risk involves voice cloning. As voice-activated banking systems and phone-based transaction verifications grow more common, fraudsters use audio deepfakes to mimic a customer’s voice. If a bank calls to confirm a transaction, criminals can respond with cloned audio that perfectly imitates the customer, bypassing voice authentication and seizing control of accounts. Scammers also use voice and video deepfakes to impersonate financial advisors or bank representatives, making victims believe they are speaking to trusted officials. These fraudulent interactions may involve fake offers, urgent warnings, or requests for sensitive data, all designed to extract confidential information. 

The growing realism of deepfakes means consumers must adopt new habits to protect themselves. Double-checking unusual requests is a critical step, as fraudsters often rely on urgency or trust to manipulate their targets. Verifying any unexpected communication by calling a bank’s official number or visiting in person remains the safest option. Monitoring accounts regularly is another defense, as early detection of unauthorized or suspicious activity can prevent larger financial losses. Setting alerts for every transaction, even small ones, can make fraudulent activity easier to spot. 

Using multi-factor authentication adds an essential layer of protection against these scams. By requiring more than just a password to access accounts, such as one-time codes, biometrics, or additional security questions, banks make it much harder for criminals to succeed, even if deepfakes are involved. Customers should also remain cautious of video and audio communications requesting sensitive details. Even if the interaction appears authentic, confirming through secure channels is far more reliable than trusting what seems real on screen or over the phone.  

Deepfake-enabled fraud is dangerous precisely because of how authentic it looks and sounds. Yet, by staying vigilant, educating yourself about emerging scams, and using available security tools, it is possible to reduce risks. Awareness and skepticism remain the strongest defenses, ensuring that financial safety is not compromised by increasingly deceptive digital threats.

Encryption Flaws Allow Hackers to Steal Vehicles without Leaving a Trace


New vulnerabilities were revealed earlier this week in the encryption frameworks utilized by immobilizers, the radio-enabled gadgets within cars that usually communicate at short range with a 'key fob' to easily unlock the car's ignition and permit it to start as discovered by researchers from KU Leuven in Belgium and the University of Birmingham in the UK. 

Issues were particularly identified in Toyota, Hyundai, and Kia who utilize and further implement a Texas Instruments encryption system called DST80. Aside from these, a couple of other influenced vehicles incorporate Camry, Corolla, and RAV4; Kia Optima, Soul, and Rio; the full rundown of vehicles that the researchers have found to have the cryptographic defects in their immobilizers is below:


In spite of the fact that the list likewise incorporates the Tesla S, the researchers announced the DST80 vulnerability to Tesla a year ago, and the company pushed out a firmware update that blocked the assault. Toyota has affirmed that the cryptographic vulnerabilities the researchers discovered are genuine. 

Be that as it may, their technique likely isn't as simple to pull off as the "relay" attacks that thieves have utilized over and overused to steal luxury cars and SUVs. Those, by and large, require just a couple of radio devices to expand the range of a key fob to open and start a victim's vehicle. One can pull them off from a reasonable distance, even though the walls of a structure. 

The researchers built up their key cloning technique by purchasing an assortment of immobilizers' electronic control units from eBay and reverse engineering the firmware to break down how they communicated with key fobs. They regularly saw it far as too simple to even consider cracking the secret value that Texas Instruments DST80 encryption utilized for authentication. 

Anyway, the issue lies not in DST80 itself however in how the carmakers implemented it: The Toyota fobs' cryptographic key depended on their serial number, for instance, and furthermore openly transmitted that serial number when checked with an RFID reader. What's more, Kia and Hyundai's key fobs utilized 24 bits of randomness instead of the 80 bits that the DST80 offers, making their secret values simple to figure. At the point when the affected carmakers and Texas Instruments were reached out for comments, Kia and Texas Instruments didn't respond. 

Be that as it may, Hyundai noted in a statement that none of its affected models are sold in the US. Toyota reacted in an explanation that “the described vulnerability applies to older models, as current models have a different configuration." 

In any case, the researchers have chosen to distribute their findings to uncover the genuine condition of immobilizer security and permit car owners to choose for themselves if it's sufficient. Protective car owners with hackable immobilizers may choose, like whether or not to utilize a steering wheel lock or not.