Like recent data breaches, your personal information could now be with threat actors, and it is not your fault. This blog covers details related to the breach, and the steps you can take to protect your credit card and avoid misuse of credit card numbers.
In the notification sent to affected victims, Slim CD said hackers gained access to its network for almost a year, from August 2023 to June 2024. But they could only steal credit card details between June 14 and 15 of this year.
Earlier this year in June, Slim CD found that suspicious users had access to its systems. After that, the company launched an inquiry, which revealed that hackers had first gained entry into the networks in August 2023. The stolen data includes physical addresses, full names, credit card numbers and card expiry dates. Luckily, card verification numbers or CVVs weren't stolen, the company says.
Experts believe that without CVV, hackers can't do much with the stolen credit card data or make any fraudulent transactions with your credit card. But the risk of credit card fraud is still there.
Generally, if you suffer a major data breach, the company offers free access to either credit monitoring or identity theft protection services. But in the case of Slim CD, it isn't doing anything like this for affected users.
The Slim CD incident has highlighted various gap areas for both businesses and customers.
1. Robust Security Measures: Investment is crucial in this area this includes encryption, two-factor authentication, and frequent security audits. These steps can help protect against unauthorized attempts at stealing sensitive info.
2. Monitoring: Customers should frequently keep an eye on their bank statements and credit reports for any suspicious activity. Threat detection at an early stage can reduce the damage caused by a data breach.
3. Quick Response: In the event of a data breach, a fast response becomes important. Informing impacted individuals and offering support can help minimize the damage and rebuild trust.
4. Being Informed and Educated: Both companies and customers should be aware about the basic safety steps needed to be safe from a data breach. For businesses awareness programs and training campaigns can provide certain help.
In the realm of cybersecurity, ensuring the safety and integrity of a network is a multifaceted endeavor. One crucial aspect of this process is the regular assessment of potential vulnerabilities within the system. As a cybersecurity professional, our work revolves around identifying these vulnerabilities through automated scans and red team exercises, meticulously recording them in a Bugtrack Excel sheet, and collaborating with human analysts to prioritize and address the most critical issues. However, a recurring challenge in this process is the reluctance of some customers to whitelist the IP addresses of our scanning tools.
The Role of Whitelisting in Accurate Assessments
Whitelisting the scanner IP is essential for obtaining accurate and comprehensive results during security assessments. When the IP address of the scanning tool is whitelisted, it allows the scanner to perform a thorough evaluation of the network without being hindered by security measures such as firewalls or intrusion detection systems. This unrestricted access enables the scanner to identify all potential vulnerabilities, providing a realistic picture of the network's security posture.
The Reluctance to Whitelist
Despite the clear benefits, many customers are hesitant to whitelist the IP addresses of cybersecurity vendors. The primary reason for this reluctance is the perception that it could expose the network to potential threats. Customers fear that by allowing unrestricted access to the scanner, they are inadvertently creating a backdoor that could be exploited by malicious actors.
Moreover, there is a prevalent falsity in this approach. By not whitelisting the scanner IP, the results of the security assessments are often incomplete or misleading. The scanners may miss critical vulnerabilities that are hidden behind security measures, resulting in a report that underestimates the actual risks. Consequently, the management and auditors, relying on these reports, task the IT team with addressing only the identified issues, leaving the undetected vulnerabilities unaddressed.
The Illusion of Security
This approach creates an illusion of security. The customer, management, and auditors may feel satisfied with the apparent low number of vulnerabilities, believing that their network is secure. However, this false sense of security can be detrimental. Hackers are relentless and innovative, constantly seeking new ways to infiltrate networks. They are not deterred by the same security measures that hinder our scanners. By not whitelisting the scanner IP, customers are effectively blinding themselves to potential threats that hackers could exploit.
The Hacker's Advantage
Hackers employ manual methods and conduct long-term reconnaissance to find vulnerabilities within a network. They utilize a combination of sophisticated techniques and persistent efforts to bypass security measures. The tools and strategies that block scanner IPs are not effective against a determined hacker's methods. Hackers can slowly and methodically map out the network, identify weaknesses, and exfiltrate data without triggering the same alarms that automated scanners might. This means that even if a scanner is blocked, a hacker can still find and exploit vulnerabilities, leading to potentially catastrophic breaches.
The Need for Continuous and Accurate Scanning
Security scanners need to perform regular assessments—daily or weekly—to keep up with the evolving threat landscape. For these scans to be effective, the scanner IP must be whitelisted to ensure consistent and accurate results. This repetitive scanning is crucial for maintaining a robust security posture, as it allows for the timely identification and remediation of new vulnerabilities.
The Conference Conundrum
Adding to this challenging landscape is the current trend in cybersecurity conferences. Instead of inviting actual security researchers, security engineers, or architects who write defensive software, many conferences are being hosted by OEM vendors or Consulting organizations. These vendors often showcase the users of their security products rather than the experts who develop and understand the intricate details of cybersecurity defense mechanisms. This practice can lead to a superficial understanding of security products and their effectiveness, as the focus shifts from in-depth technical knowledge to user experiences and testimonials.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the reluctance to whitelist scanner IPs stems from a misunderstanding of the importance of comprehensive and accurate security assessments. While it may seem counterintuitive, whitelisting these IP addresses is a necessary step in identifying and addressing all potential vulnerabilities within a network.
By embracing this practice, customers can move beyond the illusion of security and take proactive measures to protect their networks from the ever-evolving threats posed by cybercriminals. The ultimate goal is to ensure that both the customer and their management are genuinely secure, rather than merely appearing to be so. Security measures that block scanner IPs won't thwart a dedicated hacker who uses manual methods and long-term reconnaissance. Thus, comprehensive vulnerability assessments are essential to safeguarding against real-world threats. Additionally, there needs to be a shift in how cybersecurity conferences are organized, prioritizing the inclusion of true security experts to enhance the industry's collective knowledge and capabilities.
--
Suriya Prakash and Sabari Selvan
CySecurity Corp
In the event that this occurs, outsiders will have access to your bank account information and other private information. They may even be able to listen in on your private discussions with loved ones, parents, or other family members.
However, you can tell if your wifi has been hacked or not by looking for these five indicators:
If your internet provider is normally trouble-free, an abrupt and unusual slowdown in your access to the internet may indicate that hackers have attacked your router.
Unknown gadgets, sometimes known as rogue devices, may indicate that hackers are trying to access private data from your router.
If you see this, you need to check if any unidentified devices are included in the list of connected devices by logging in to your router's IP address, which is typically found on the router itself.
Should this occur without warning, there may be a connection to hacker activity.
You won't be able to access the router and resolve the problem on your own because these annoying hackers typically alter your login credentials after they have access.
If you notice any strange new software on your device, it can be a sign that hackers have been targeting your network and maybe installing malware.
You will almost certainly notice this: if your browser starts directing you to strange websites, it's possible that hackers have altered your DNS settings. You may also notice things like ransomware messages appearing that purport to have sensitive data or photos, suggesting that hackers may have gained access to your router.
Fake purchasers will often contact real sellers of goods and appear to be interested in making a purchase in an attempt to obtain your private information.
The scammer would then lie and claim to have transferred monies that are only available through a dubious link, so the transaction never actually happens.
Usually, the link is a phishing one, where the seller enters their bank card information thinking they will get money, but inadvertently allows their account to be drained. There are, nevertheless, safety measures you can do. Downloading antivirus software would help prevent those hackers from getting near you.
Research published by Consumer Services (CSI) reveals increasing threats among bank executives in hiring new talent and facing cybercrime threats as a challenge. The survey received 279 executive responses from the banking sector nationwide, bankers listed cybersecurity dangers (26%) and hiring employees (21%) as the top problems in 2022.
The survey results, suggesting respondents from different bank asset sizes, provide an alternate look into how these organizations tackle concerning issues like compliance, technological innovations, and customer expectations.
For example, to improve user experience and increase market shares, banks are promoting the use of digital tools, like account opening (51% responses), customer relationship management (43% responses), and digital loans (36% respondents).
CSI is a leading fintech, regtech, and cybersecurity solutions partner operating at the intersection of innovation and service. It excels at driving the business forward with a unique blend of cutting-edge technology, effortless integration, and a commitment to authentic partnerships defined by our customer-first culture.
Customers have raised the bar in expectations from banks, and the latter should respond accordingly, says David Culbertson, CSI president, and CEO. The data is paired with banks' aspirations to improve digital tools, the banking industry is moving towards a digital-first mindset and aiming for digital advancement. Interestingly, bank leaders also aspire to open banking for growth, particularly for digital progress.
The latest research suggests how banking institutes measure their personal growth in the rising digital landscape scenario. "For example, although executives on average rated their institutions a healthy 4/5 on compliance readiness, regulatory changes remain top of mind, with 14% of respondents naming it their primary concern.," reports HelpNet Security.
Keeping the new administration in mind, bankers have mentioned "data privacy" (39% responses) and CECL (20% responses) as the most needed measures for banking institutions. "The continuation of remote work will make this a critical component, along with new asset types such as cryptocurrencies being adopted, and increasing privacy regulations.
On the other hand, ransomware is expected to remain a challenge alongside a bigger looming threat from quantum computing, which holds the potential to defeat modern encryption systems," reports HelpNet Security.
A new large-scale DDoS attack carried out late in the evening on September 2 led to the system failure of major banks and made some of their services unavailable. Thus, a number of large banks experienced problems with payments and card services for some time.
VTB, Sberbank and Alfa-Bank withstood the attack, but their Internet provider Orange Business Services experienced significant difficulties.
"Everything that went through Internet providers, including land points that are connected by wires, ATMs, POS terminals, did not work for some time," said a bank representative.
"The IT services of our partners and their communication providers faced a DDoS attack, which affected the payment of customers in remote service channels," VTB reported.
Sberbank reported that on September 2, a failure was recorded on the side of an external service provider, which could lead to short delays in the operation of individual services.
"Some reports recorded by the Downdetector resource could be related to problems with one of the local Internet providers," Alfa-Bank reported.
Olga Baranova, Operational Director of Orange Business Services in Russia and the CIS, said that since August 9, the company's cyber threat monitoring center has been recording attacks on financial clients around the clock using capacitive attacks such as Amplification, as well as attacks using encrypted protocols (HTTPS).
"These attacks continue even now. The most powerful one was about 100 Gbps. Moreover, in terms of the number of attacks we detected, this August is comparable to the entire last year," added she.
As explained by the founder and CEO of Qrator Labs, Alexander Lyamin, Amplification attacks are aimed at communication channels, and HTTPS or Application Layer attacks are aimed directly at applications. "DDoS attacks of this type are the most dangerous: they are difficult to detect and neutralize since they can simulate legitimate traffic," noted he.
Awillix specialists discovered vulnerabilities in bank chatbots that could allow fraudsters to transfer money without the knowledge of customers. Positive Technologies confirmed the risks. The largest banks reported that they limit the functionality of chatbots in messengers.
It should be noted that about 10% of Russian banks use chatbots: they can be used in messengers, mobile applications, social networks, on the website and in the contact center.
Alexander Gerasimov, Director of Information Security at Awillix, said that chatbots in messengers, which are used for individual account transactions, may be vulnerable to malicious attacks.
The company's specialists checked the security of chatbots in two Russian credit organizations and found similar logical vulnerabilities. They allow obtaining the number and expiration date of cards, as well as finding out the account balance and cell phone number of the client.
"During the pentests, it was possible to log into the test client's account and perform a money transfer operation," Alexander Gerasimov said.
Maxim Kostikov, head of the banking systems security research group at Positive Technologies, confirmed that chatbots can be subject to various vulnerabilities, which depend on their functionality. For example, security problems can allow you to get customer data, get into their personal accounts in the chatbot, and find out the card balance.
According to him, the most popular scenarios of deception are changing the functionality of the chatbot to collect information about the person who uses it, sending malicious software on behalf of a credit institution, replacing the robot with a fraudster during communication, creating fake chatbots of banks.
"If a person uses a bank chatbot, which is able to make money transfers in the messenger, two-factor authentication can be configured to log into the application to protect funds," stressed Infosystems Jet expert, adding that there is also a danger in cases when an attacker gained direct access to the victim's device physically or as a result of a malicious attack.
Financial organizations are planning to launch a pilot project of a system for accounting and analyzing telephone fraud, said Alexey Voilukov, vice president of the Association of Banks of Russia. The service will allow to monitor calls, identify unscrupulous operators and more effectively track the fraudsters.
The Association will present the developments to the regulatory agencies along with proposals for changing the legislation. In order to improve the response to criminal attacks, the project should be implemented on the basis of the site of the supervisory authority, for example, the Ministry of Internal Affairs.
Experts believe that the owner of such a system should be one of the government agencies, authorized to request information from operators about the sources of traffic and to process data containing the secrecy of communications.
"It is necessary to tighten legislation in the field of personal data protection and tighten control over bank employees since fraudsters often obtain information about customers through leaks," added experts.
Tinkoff Bank believes that it will take about a month to test the project after the creation of an interdepartmental anti-fraud group. The bank will become one of the pilot's participants.
Other major credit organizations also supported the idea of implementing the system. The pilot of the project can start as early as the end of 2021 or the beginning of 2022. However, full work will require changes in the law.
According to Tinkoff, the number of malicious calls in the first quarter of 2021 increased 2.3 times compared to the same period in 2020. In addition, about 80% of phone scammers use number spoofing, so after launching the project of the system of accounting and analysis of telephone fraud, it will be much more difficult for them to carry out attacks.
As a result of an international special operation, the Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine has stopped the activity of one of the world's largest phishing services for attacks on financial institutions in different countries.
The Prosecutor's Office said that as a result of the work of the phishing center, banks in 11 countries - Australia, Spain, the United States, Italy, Chile, the Netherlands, Mexico, France, Switzerland, Germany and the United Kingdom - were affected. According to preliminary data, the losses reach tens of millions of dollars.
It is reported that a hacker from Ternopil developed a phishing package and a special administrative panel aimed at the web resources of banks and their clients.
"The admin panel allowed to control the accounts of users who registered on compromised resources and entered their payment data, which were later received by the fraudsters. He created his own online store on the DarkNet network to demonstrate the functionality and sell his developments," the Prosecutor's Office explained the algorithm of the center's functioning.
More than 200 active buyers of malicious software were found.
According to the investigation, the hacker did not only sell their products but also provide technical support in the implementation of phishing attacks.
"According to the results of the analysis of foreign law enforcement agencies, more than 50% of all phishing attacks in 2019 in Australia were carried out with the help of the development of the Ternopil hacker," said the Department.
A criminal case has been opened on this fact under the article on unauthorized interference in the operation of computers, automated systems, computer networks, or telecommunications networks, as well as the creation of harmful software products for the purpose of using, distributing, or selling them.
Earlier, the deputy director of the National Coordination Center for Computer Incidents (NCCI), Nikolai Murashov, said that the United States had placed hackers in Montenegro and Ukraine. This was done allegedly under the pretext of protecting the elections.