Search This Blog
Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

About Me

Load More
Trendy Right Now

Popular Posts

Showing posts with label ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS). Show all posts
zero Day vulnerability
Cyber intrusion Cyber Security CyberThreat DDoS FortiGate IoT IP Address Networkk Infrastructure ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) VPN Vulnerabilities Firewalls zero Day vulnerability

Firewalls and VPNs Under Siege as Businesses Report Growing Cyber Intrusions

 


A security researcher has discovered an ongoing cyberattack that is active, exploiting a newly discovered vulnerability in Fortinet's FortiGate Firewalls to infiltrate corporate and enterprise networks and has been conducting this activity for some time. A security advisory published on Tuesday by Fortinet confirmed the existence of the critical security flaw known as CVE-2024-55591 and indicated that the vulnerability is currently being exploited in the wild. 

Nevertheless, cybersecurity experts are voicing their concerns over the possibility that malicious actors are exploiting this flaw as a zero-day vulnerability - a term that refers to a software vulnerability exploited before the vendor is made aware of or has issued a patch for it. According to a report by Fortinet, attackers may have actively targeted this vulnerability since at least December, many months before it was publicly disclosed and patched. 

In particular, organisations that heavily rely on FortiGate Firewalls for perimeter defence face a significant threat when the vulnerability is exploited by exploiting CVE-2024-55591. As a result of the vulnerability's criticality, enterprises should apply security updates as soon as possible and examine their systems for any indications of unauthorized access as soon as possible. Even though zero-day exploits remain a threat, this development highlights the fact that cybercriminals are increasingly focusing on foundational network infrastructure to gain a foothold in high-value environments. 

The use of virtual private networks (VPNs) as a critical defence mechanism against a variety of cyber threats has long been regarded as a crucial aspect of protecting digital communications from a wide range of threats. VPNs are effective in neutralising the risks associated with man-in-the-middle attacks, which involve unauthorised parties trying to intercept or manipulate data while it is in transit by encrypting the data transmissions. Through this layer of encryption, sensitive data remains secure, even across unsecured networks. 

One of the most prominent use cases for VPNs is that they serve the purpose of protecting people using public Wi-Fi networks, which are often vulnerable to unauthorised access. It has been shown that VPNs are significantly less likely to expose or compromise data in such situations because they route traffic through secure tunnels. Additionally, VPNs hide the IP addresses of users, thereby providing greater anonymity to users and reducing the possibility of malicious actors tracking or monitoring them. 

As a result of this concealment, network resources are also protected against distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, which often use IP addresses as a method of overloading network resources. Even though VPNs have been around for decades, their use today does not suffice as a standalone solution due to the increasingly complex threat landscape that exists in today's society. To ensure comprehensive protection against increasingly sophisticated attack vectors, it is important to integrate their capabilities with more advanced, adaptive cybersecurity measures. 

It seems that conventional security frameworks, such as Firewalls and VPN,s are becoming increasingly outpaced as the cybersecurity landscape continues to evolve due to the sophistication and frequency of modern threats, which have increased significantly over the past few years. Businesses across many industries are experiencing an increasing number of breaches and vulnerabilities, and traditional methods of addressing these vulnerabilities are no longer capable of doing so. 

Due to the widespread transition from on-premises infrastructure to remote and digitally distributed work environments, legacy security architectures have become increasingly vulnerable, forcing enterprises to reassess and update their defence strategies. Firewalls and VPNs were once considered to be the cornerstones of enterprise network security; however, in today's increasingly complex threat environment, they are having trouble meeting the demands. 

In the past, these technologies have played an important role in securing organisational boundaries, but today, the limitations of those technologies are becoming increasingly apparent as organisations transition to a cloud-based environment and undergo rapid digital transformation. In the year 2025, technological advances are expected to change the way industry operations are conducted—for instance, the adoption of generative artificial intelligence, automation, and the proliferation of Iot and OT systems. 

Despite these innovations, there are also unprecedented risks associated with them. For example, malicious actors use artificial intelligence to automate spear-phishing efforts, craft highly evasive malware, and exploit vulnerabilities more quickly and accurately than they could previously. In addition, as Ransomware-as-a-Service (Raas) is on the rise, the barrier to entry for hackers is dropping, enabling a broader set of threat actors to conduct sophisticated, scalable attacks on businesses. To respond effectively to the complexities of a digitally driven world, organisations must adopt proactive, adaptive cybersecurity models that are capable of responding to the challenges of this dynamic threat environment and moving beyond legacy security tools.

There has been a significant shift in cybersecurity dynamics that has led to a worrying trend: malicious actors are increasingly exploiting Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) as a strategy to gain an advantage over their adversaries. Since VPNs were originally developed as a way to enhance privacy and protect data, they are increasingly being repurposed by cybercriminals to facilitate complex attacks while masking their identity digitally. Because VPNs are dual-purpose devices, they have become instruments of exploitation, which poses a significant challenge for cybersecurity professionals as well as digital forensics teams to deal with. 

There is one particularly alarming technique for using VPN software to exploit vulnerabilities, which involves deliberately exploiting these vulnerabilities to bypass perimeter defences, infiltrate secure systems, and deploy malware without being it. When attackers identify and target these vulnerabilities, they can easily bypass perimeter defences, infiltrate secure systems, and deploy malware without being detected. 

Frequently, such breaches act as entry points into larger campaigns, such as coordinated phishing campaigns that attempt to trick individuals into revealing confidential information. Further, VPNs are known for the ability to mask the actual IP addresses of threat actors, a technique known as IP address masquerading, which enables them to evade geographical restrictions, mislead investigators, and remain anonymous when they launch cyberattacks.

In addition to enabling adversaries to circumvent Firewalls, VPNs also offer the option of encrypting and tunnelling, thus enabling them to penetrate networks that would otherwise be resistant to unauthorised access with greater ease. As a matter of fact, VPNs are often used as a means of spreading malicious software across unreliable networks. By using an encrypted VPN traffic, malware can be able to bypass traditional detection methods, thereby circumventing traditional detection methods. The shield of anonymity provided by VPNs can also be used by threat actors to impersonate legitimate organisations and initiate phishing campaigns, compromising the privacy and integrity of users. 

VPNs can also facilitate the spreading of Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks, which is equally troubling. As these networks are anonymised, it makes it difficult to trace the origin of such attacks, which hinders the development of appropriate response strategies and mitigation strategies. This paradox underscores the complexity of modern cybersecurity, since one security tool can serve both as a tool for cybercrime and a tool for security. 

Even though VPNs remain an important tool to keep users safe and anonymous, their misuse requires a proactive and multifaceted response. To combat this misuse, people need robust technological defences combined with ongoing awareness and education initiatives, which will help us address this misuse effectively. Only through such comprehensive measures can organisations ensure the integrity of VPN technology and ensure trust in the digital privacy infrastructure as long as the technology remains intact. 

Check Point has issued a formal warning regarding the active targeting of its VPN devices as part of an ongoing increase in cyber threats against enterprise infrastructure. As a result of this disclosure, people have been reminded again that there is a sustained campaign aimed at compromising remote access technologies and critical network defences. It is the second time in recent months that a major cybersecurity vendor has released such an alert in the past couple of months. 

According to Cisco, in April 2024, organisations are being warned about a widespread wave of brute-force attacks against VPNs and Secure Shell (SSH) services that are likely to impact several devices from Cisco, Check Point, SonicWall, Fortinet, and Ubiquiti, among others. In the first observed attack around March 18, attackers used anonymised tools, such as TOR exit nodes, proxy networks, and other techniques to obfuscate and avoid detection and block lists, to launch the attacks. 

In March of this year, Cisco had also noticed that passwords were being sprayed at their Secure Firewall appliances that were running Remote Access VPN (RAVPN) services. According to analysts, this is a reconnaissance phase, likely intended to lay the groundwork for more advanced intrusions to follow. Following a subsequent analysis by cybersecurity researcher Aaron Martin, these incidents were linked to a malware botnet dubbed "Brutus", which was previously undocumented. 

Over 20,000 IP addresses were found to be associated with this botnet that was deployed from both residential and cloud-hosted environments, which greatly complicated the process of attribution and mitigation. The threat landscape has only been compounded by Cisco's announcement that a state-sponsored hacker group, also known as UAT4356, has been utilising zero-day vulnerabilities found within its Firepower Threat Defence (FTD) and Adaptive Security Appliances to exploit zero-day vulnerabilities. 

Known by the codename ArcaneDoor, the cyber-espionage campaign has been ongoing since November 2023, targeting critical infrastructure networks as well as governments around the world as part of a broader cyber-espionage campaign. As the frequency and complexity of cyber attacks continue to increase, it is apparent that legacy perimeter defences are no longer adequate in terms of security. 

A layered, intelligence-driven approach to security includes detecting threats in real time, hardening systems continuously, and responding to incidents in a proactive manner. As well as strengthening cybersecurity resilience, fostering collaboration between public and private sectors, sharing threat intelligence, and providing ongoing training to employees can make sure that they remain ahead of their adversaries. There is no doubt that the future of secure enterprise operations is going to be determined by the ability to anticipate, adapt, and remain vigilant in this rapidly evolving digital age.
Read more »
Ransomwares
CISA & FBI CISA advisory Cyber Attacks Malwares Medusa Attacks Medusa Ransomware RaaS ransomware attacks ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) Ransomwares

Medusa Ransomware Attacks: CISA, FBI, and MS-ISAC Issue #StopRansomware Advisory

 

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), in partnership with the FBI and the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC), has issued a #StopRansomware advisory, warning organizations about the increasing threat of Medusa ransomware. 

Medusa, a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) variant, was first detected in 2021 and has since targeted over 300 victims across multiple critical infrastructure sectors. Industries such as healthcare, law, education, insurance, technology, and manufacturing have been particularly affected, highlighting the wide reach and severity of the ransomware’s impact. Medusa initially operated as a closed ransomware variant, meaning its developers had full control over its deployment and operations. 

Over time, it transitioned to an affiliate-based model, allowing external cybercriminals to use the ransomware while keeping certain aspects, such as ransom negotiations, under the control of the original developers. This shift has allowed Medusa to expand its reach, increasing its effectiveness as a cyber threat. Medusa demands ransoms ranging from $100,000 to as much as $15 million. 

Like many modern ransomware variants, it employs double extortion tactics—stealing sensitive data before encrypting victim networks. This strategy puts additional pressure on victims, as attackers can threaten to leak or sell stolen data if the ransom is not paid. Cybersecurity researchers from Symantec’s Threat Hunter team recently reported a rise in Medusa-related attacks over the past year. 

Medusa’s developers use initial access brokers (IABs) to gain entry into victim networks. These brokers operate within cybercriminal forums and marketplaces, selling access to compromised systems for amounts ranging from $100 to $1 million. Medusa affiliates rely on phishing campaigns and vulnerability exploitation to gain initial access, making it crucial for organizations to bolster their email security and patch known vulnerabilities. Once inside a system, Medusa operators use “living-off-the-land” (LotL) techniques, leveraging legitimate system tools to evade detection while conducting reconnaissance, data theft, and lateral movement.

Given Medusa’s evolving tactics, cybersecurity experts stress the importance of proactive defense measures. Organizations should deploy security patches, implement network segmentation, and restrict access to critical services from untrusted sources. Dan Lattimer, area vice president for Semperis in the UK and Ireland, emphasized the need for an “assumed breach” mindset, urging companies to shift from a prevention-focused approach to rapid detection, response, and recovery. 

As ransomware attacks grow more sophisticated, organizations must remain vigilant, continuously updating their cybersecurity strategies to mitigate risks and strengthen their defenses against threats like Medusa.
Read more »
VPN
BackLock Black Basta Cyberhacekrs Cybersecurity CyberThreat malware Ransomware ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) VBS VPN

Black Basta's Slowdown Coincides with BlackLock's Growth

 


The activity level of ransomware groups with "black" in their name has varied greatly over the early months of the new year. Despite the significant increase in attacks caused by the BlackLock ransomware group, the long-established Black Basta ransomware group appears to be about to break up, although it is still posing a persistent cybersecurity threat even so. 

Even though BlackLock was first identified as a ransomware-as-a-service operation in March 2024, the cyber-criminals have been actively targeting multiple platforms in the past few months, including Windows, VMware ESXi, and Linux systems, according to a report by cybersecurity firm ReliaQuest. According to a report by ReliaQuest, BlackLock, also known as El Dorado or Eldorado, utilizes a double-extortion strategy, which involves exfiltration of sensitive data from a victim before the encryption of their computer systems. 

With this approach, threat actors can demand a ransom in addition to the decryption of compromised files to obtain a promise that they will not reveal the stolen data once they have decrypted it. As reported by ReliaQuest, BlackLock has also reported a substantial increase in its activities over the last three months, with its data leak site registering fourteen times as many victims as it did in the previous three months of 2024. In light of this sharp increase, it is evident that BlackLock is becoming a greater threat to organizations, as it continues to expand its operations and refine its extortion tactics, which are becoming increasingly sophisticated. 

To enhance an enterprise's cybersecurity posture, it is crucial to have a thorough understanding of the Black Basta attack methodologies. The Black Basta ransomware group attacks targeted organizations by exploiting known vulnerabilities, system misconfigurations, and inadequate security controls. It has been determined that the group systematically focused on exposed Remote Desktop Protocol servers, weak authentication mechanisms, malware droppers disguised as legitimate files, and exposed RDP servers through analyzing its internal communications. 

In April 2022, blackBasta, a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) operation based in Russian, was first discovered. It is safe to say that Black Basta expanded quickly after the dismantling of the Conti ransomware group, taking advantage of the void left behind and including former Conti affiliates in its ranks in an effort to exploit the void left behind. Through this strategic expansion, the group was able to orchestrate attacks against hundreds of organizations throughout the world, establishing itself as an elite cybercriminal organization. 

According to cyber-intelligence firm Prodaft, the group's campaigns have declined steadily over the past couple of months, with its last known operations occurring in December, according to the firm. Since this group was previously one of the most dominant players in the ransomware landscape, it has been the subject of considerable attention within the cybersecurity community during this abrupt downturn in activity. There are numerous sophisticated attack vectors employed by Black Basta to compromise systems, which include the following. 

Among its primary tactics has been scanning for exposed RDP and VPN services around the world. This group frequently takes advantage of the default credentials available for VPN connections, or they use brute-force attacks to establish initial access by exploiting previously compromised credentials. Black Basta is also actively exploiting known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) in unpatched systems, taking advantage of organizations that are not updated with security patches, or are behind in updating their security systems. 

To make malware deployment much easier, ransomware operators often use MSI (Microsoft Installer) and VBS (Visual Basic Script) malware droppers that deliver malicious payloads discreetly to make malware deployments easier. The majority of these payloads are executed by misusing system utilities such as Rundll32.exe, which can be used to execute harmful DLL files as a result. Additionally, this group focuses on credential harvesting and privilege escalation, which allows them to gain a deeper understanding of a compromised network and to increase their impact.

Black Bastion’s tactics have been evolving over the years and are becoming more persistent. This is why organizations should adopt a proactive cybersecurity strategy, ensuring regular patching, robust authentication protocols, and continuous network monitoring to minimize the risks posed by this malware. There is no denying that the sophistication of malware used by threat actors greatly influences the effectiveness of ransomware operations. 

As a result of developing and maintaining proprietary crypters, prominent ransomware groups like Play, Qilin, and BlackLock have distinguished themselves from the competition. It has been widely believed that leading cybercriminal organizations have used customized crypters to enhance the stealth and operational efficiency of their malware, making security systems more difficult to detect and mitigate. 


A strategic advantage for these organizations is the ability to market their malware as faster and more evasive than the competitors, which will help them attract high-level affiliates. However, other ransomware groups, such as Bl00dy, Dragonforce, and RA World, rely on leaked ransomware builders that were originally developed by Babuk or LockBit. In his opinion, Jim Wilson, a ReliaQuest security analyst, believes such groups are either lacking the technical expertise required to develop proprietary malware or they are not able to afford to pay skilled developers to develop proprietary malware. From a cybersecurity perspective, the reliance on publicly available tools creates opportunities for defenders, as it enables them to analyze code and develop targeted countermeasures based on that analysis. 

Recently, BlackLock has become increasingly popular within cybercriminal forums. Wilson has noted that the group actively recruits affiliates, initial access brokers, and experienced developers through the Ramp forum. The alias "$$$" is used to identify this group as active within the Ramp cybercrime forums. The BlackLock group also frequently recruits "traffers" which are cybercriminals who send victims to malicious websites before passing them off to more experienced operatives for execution. According to incident response firms, ransomware groups typically gain their first access to enterprise networks through phishing campaigns as well as by utilizing remote access tools. 

Cybercriminals often use known software vulnerabilities to attack systems by infiltrating them. Sophisticated ransomware groups are constantly trying to improve their attack strategies through utilizing innovative methods. There was a post made by "$$$" on Ramp on January 28, 2025, in which he asked hackers who had experience exploiting Microsoft's Entra Connect Sync, a software that allows Active Directory to be synchronized with Entra (formerly Azure Active Directory), to be exploited. 

Research published by SpecterOps in December 2024 was referenced as the basis for this request. As part of the research, attackers were able to inject their own Windows Hello for Business (WHFB) key into a victim's account to exploit Entra's synchronization mechanisms. Additionally, cybersecurity expert Garrity noted that Black Basta has demonstrated a proactive approach to vulnerability exploitation. 

The group reportedly discusses new vulnerabilities within days of security advisories being released and, while hesitant, considers purchasing exploits from emerging threat actors. Furthermore, there is evidence suggesting that Black Basta possesses the necessary resources to develop new exploits. Garrity’s analysis of Black Basta’s chat logs indicates a strategic yet opportunistic approach that prioritizes well-known vulnerabilities and high-value targets. 

While the group primarily leverages established exploit frameworks and widely available tools, discussions within their network suggest a potential for new exploit development and tactical evolution. For cybersecurity defenders, the key takeaway is the importance of prioritizing vulnerability remediation through an evidence-based security strategy. Cybersecurity firm Rapid7 has reported that Black Basta has continuously refined its social engineering techniques, incorporating enhanced malware payloads, improved delivery mechanisms, and advanced evasion tactics. 

The group has been observed leveraging Microsoft Teams to impersonate IT personnel, often masquerading as help desk or customer support representatives. Upon engaging a victim, attackers attempt to install remote management tools such as AnyDesk, TeamViewer, or ScreenConnect, deploy malicious QR codes, or establish a reverse shell using OpenSSH. Once access is secured, malware such as Zbot or DarkGate is used to escalate privileges, harvest credentials, and bypass multifactor authentication, ultimately leading to data exfiltration and ransomware deployment. 

A December 2024 attack investigated by ReliaQuest involved a Microsoft lookalike domain sending a flood of phishing emails to employees, followed by direct calls through Teams. Within minutes of gaining access via Quick Assist, the attacker established communication with a command-and-control server and began lateral movement within 48 minutes, successfully exfiltrating data from a manufacturing firm. Despite these ongoing attacks, intelligence from deep and dark web sources suggests that Black Basta’s leadership has exhibited signs of fatigue since mid-2024. 

According to RedSense analyst Bohuslavskiy, key members, including a critical administrator, have reportedly lost interest in ransomware operations, possibly due to prolonged involvement since 2019 or 2020. While the group appears to be scaling down, its infrastructure remains operational, with continued victim negotiations and ransomware deployments. However, declining operational standards have led to increased failures in decryption, rendering attacks even more destructive due to the group's growing negligence.

As well, Cybersecurity expert Garrity noted that Black Basta has been proactive when it comes to exploiting vulnerabilities. It has been reported that the group discusses new vulnerabilities as soon as security advisories are released, and while it is reluctant to buy exploits from emerging threat actors, the group is still considering doing so. Several pieces of evidence suggest that Black Basta possesses the necessary resources to develop new exploits based on evidence. 

According to Garrity's analysis of Black Basta's chat logs, the group takes a strategic yet opportunistic approach, prioritizing well-known vulnerabilities and high-value targets. Although the group primarily relies on established exploit frameworks and readily available tools, discussions within the group suggest that new exploits could be developed and tactically evolved in the future. 

Among the key takeaways for cybersecurity defenders is the importance of prioritizing vulnerability remediation as part of an evidence-based security strategy. According to Rapid7, Black Basta has continuously reworked its social engineering techniques, including enhancing malware payloads, improving delivery mechanisms, and incorporating evasion tactics to make it more effective than before. Observations have indicated that the group uses Microsoft Teams to impersonate IT employees, often masquerading as help desk or customer support representatives. 

As soon as the attacker engages a victim, he or she attempts to install remote management tools such as AnyDesk, TeamViewer, or ScreenConnect to deploy malicious QR codes, or to establish a reverse shell via OpenSSH in the event of an attack. Malware, such as Zbot, DarkGate, and other malicious programs, is then employed to escalate privileges, harvest credentials, and bypass multifactor authentication, resulting in data exfiltration and ransomware deployment. This attack is believed to have been perpetrated by a Microsoft-like domain that sent phishing emails to employees in December 2024, followed by direct calls through Teams. 

After gaining access via Quick Assist in less than five minutes, the attacker established a connection with a command and control server, started moving laterally within 48 minutes, and successfully extracted information from a manufacturing company within 48 minutes. However, information from deep and dark web sources suggests that the leadership of Black Basta has shown signs of fatigue since mid-2024 despite these ongoing attacks. 

It has been reported that RedSense analyst Bohuslavskiy believes key members, including a critical administrator, have lost interest in ransomware operations, possibly due to their prolonged involvement in the ransomware campaign from 2019 or 2020. Although the group appears to be reducing its operations, it has been continuing to negotiate with victims and deploy ransomware, despite its apparent scaling down. It is important to note that while operational standards are decreasing, more and more failures in decryption have arisen during the last few years, which has rendered attacks even more destructive due to the growing negligence of the group.
Read more »
ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS)
Cyber Attacks RaaS Ransomware ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS)

Rise in RaaS Operations and Implications for Business Security


Recently, there had been news regarding the cyber-attack in a Japanese port, that blocked the smooth transfer of goods – a hack in a Las Vegas resort which led to malfunction in slot machines and guest check-ins and a whopping $100 million loss, and loss of more than 2.5 million medical records, that were stolen by hackers.

These instances have one thing in common: they were all caused by ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) operations. 

The emergence of RaaS signifies a significant advancement in the field of cybercrime, with global corporations and public infrastructure bearing the consequences.

Here, we will discuss what RaaS is, how it operates and why it poses such dangers.

The Origin Of RaaS

RaaS initially came to light in 2009, following the invention of cryptocurrency. In the first place, cryptocurrency made it simpler for hackers to demand ransoms in an anonymous manner, which contributed to the spread of ransomware. Second, it allowed hackers to transact with one another for software and services without having to reveal who they were or run the danger of having their accounts frozen by banks.

Reveton became the first ransomware gang to adopt the RaaS model. The group created malware that, after infecting a victim's computer, claimed the victim had committed an online federal felony. Then, if the victim didn't pay the ransom, it threatened to put them in jail. Later, for a price, this software was made available to hackers with lower technical proficiency.

How Does RaaS Work?

The operation of RaaS is similar to software as a service (SaaS). To put it briefly, the program is created and maintained by a committed group of programmers, who then charge a fee to allow others to use it. Like any other SaaS business, the RaaS developers might even provide committed tech support and customer service.

This fee provided to the RaaS providers is a part of the ransom paid to the gang, indicating that the RaaS users are responsible for infiltrating the network, however, the ransom money goes to the RaaS provider.

The ransomware can evade detection and the most recent antivirus software by using updates like patches from the RaaS provider. This allows the malware to infiltrate a network, encrypt data, and take it.

What Does RaaS Mean For Business Security?

The emerging threat of ransomware attacks signifies that it is now important for organizations to garner an understanding of ransomwares and take measures accordingly. 

Certain areas require close attention:

  • Ransomware preparedness: A good ransomware response plan could make a huge difference when it comes to tackling a ransomware incident. This can further reduce the damage done by the ransomware and speed up response time.
  • Internal network security: It is also important to prevent hackers from moving within the accessed networks. Installing safeguards, according to the principle of least privilege (PoLP), is a good way to prevent hackers from accessing further in the networks. 
  • Encrypting sensitive data: Attackers using ransomware depend more on extortion as backup processes improve. To prevent hackers from utilizing sensitive information against you, it is advisable to encrypt sensitive data such as bank records, proprietary data, and customer personal information.

Unfortunately, boosting levels of cybersecurity is now a part of the “new normal.” There is nothing more the companies can do. It is necessary to consider increased security as standard operating procedure.  

Read more »
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)