Cyberattacks are increasingly being used alongside conventional military actions in the ongoing conflict involving Iran, with both state-linked actors and loosely organised hacker groups targeting systems in the United States and Israel.
A recent incident involving Stryker illustrates the scale of this activity. On March 11, the company confirmed that a cyberattack had disrupted parts of its global network. Employees across several offices reportedly encountered login screens displaying the symbol of Handala, a group believed to have links to Iran. The attack affected systems within Microsoft’s environment, although the full extent of the disruption and the timeline for recovery remain unclear.
Handala has claimed responsibility for the operation, stating that it exploited Microsoft’s cloud-based device management platform, Intune. According to data from SOCRadar, the group alleged it remotely wiped more than 200,000 devices across 79 countries. These claims have not been independently verified, and attempts have been made to seek confirmation from Microsoft. The group described the attack as retaliation for a missile strike in Minab, Iran, which reportedly killed more than 160 people at a girls’ school.
This breach is part of a broader surge in cyber activity following Operation Epic Fury, with multiple pro-Iranian actors directing attacks against American and Israeli systems.
State-linked groups target essential systems
A cybersecurity assessment indicates that several groups associated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, including CyberAv3ngers, APT33, and APT55, are actively targeting critical infrastructure in the United States.
These operations focus on industrial control systems, which are specialised computers used to manage essential services such as electricity grids, water treatment plants, and manufacturing processes. In some instances, attackers have gained access by using unchanged default passwords, allowing them to install malicious software capable of interfering with or taking control of these systems.
CyberAv3ngers has reportedly accessed industrial machinery in this way, while APT33 has used commonly reused passwords to infiltrate accounts at US energy companies. After gaining entry, the group attempts to weaken safety mechanisms by inserting malware into operational systems. APT55, meanwhile, has focused on cyber-espionage, targeting individuals connected to the energy and defence sectors to gather intelligence for Iranian operations.
Other groups linked to Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security, including MuddyWater and APT34, are also involved in these campaigns. MuddyWater has targeted telecommunications providers, oil and gas companies, and government organisations. It functions as an initial access broker, meaning it breaks into networks, collects login credentials, and then passes that access to other attackers.
Handala has also claimed additional operations beyond the Stryker incident. These include deleting more than 40 terabytes of data from servers at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and breaching systems linked to Verifone in Israel. However, Verifone has stated that it found no evidence of any compromise or service disruption.
Cyber operations are also being carried out by the United States and Israel.
General Dan Caine stated on March 2 that US Cyber Command was one of the first operational units involved in Operation Epic Fury. He said these efforts disrupted Iran’s communication and sensor networks, leaving it with reduced ability to monitor, coordinate, or respond effectively. He did not provide further operational details.
On March 13, Pete Hegseth confirmed that the United States is using artificial intelligence alongside cyber tools as part of its military approach in the conflict.
Separate reporting suggests that Israeli intelligence agencies may have used data obtained from compromised traffic cameras across Tehran to support planning related to Iran’s leadership, including Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Hacktivist networks operate with fewer constraints
Alongside state-backed actors, hacktivist groups have played a significant role. More than 60 such groups reportedly mobilised in the early hours of Operation Epic Fury, forming a coalition known as the Cyber Islamic Resistance.
This network coordinates its activity through Telegram channels described as an “Electronic Operations Room.” Unlike state-directed groups, these actors operate based on ideological motivations rather than central command structures. Analysts note that such groups tend to be less disciplined, more unpredictable, and more likely to act without regard for civilian impact.
Within the first two weeks of the conflict, the coalition claimed responsibility for more than 600 distinct cyber incidents across over 100 Telegram channels. These include attacks targeting Israeli defence-related systems, drone detection platforms such as VigilAir, and infrastructure affecting electricity and water services at a hotel in Tel Aviv.
The same group also claimed to have compromised BadeSaba Calendar, a widely used religious mobile application with more than five million downloads. During the incident, users reportedly received messages such as “Help is on the way” and “It’s time for reckoning,” based on screenshots shared online.
Some analysts assess that these groups may be using artificial intelligence tools to compensate for limited technical expertise, allowing them to scale operations more effectively.
Global actors join the conflict
Cyber intelligence findings suggest that participation in these operations is expanding geographically. Ongoing internet restrictions within Iran appear to be limiting the involvement of domestic hacktivists by disrupting Telegram-based coordination.
As a result, increased activity has been observed from pro-Iranian groups based in Southeast Asia, Pakistan, and other parts of the Middle East.
The Islamic Cyber Resistance in Iraq, also known as the 313 Team, has claimed responsibility for attacks on websites belonging to Kuwaiti government ministries, including defence-related institutions, according to a separate threat intelligence briefing. The group has also reportedly targeted websites in Romania and Bahrain.
Another group, DieNet, has claimed cyber operations affecting airport systems in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.
Russian-linked actors have also entered the landscape. NoName057(16), previously involved in cyber campaigns related to Ukraine, has launched distributed denial-of-service attacks, a technique used to overwhelm websites with traffic and render them inaccessible. Targets include Israeli municipal services, political platforms, telecommunications providers, and defence-related entities, including Elbit Systems, as noted by a threat intelligence monitoring platform.
The group is also reported to be collaborating with Hider-Nex, a North Africa-based collective that has claimed attacks on Kuwaiti government domains.
Some pro-Israeli hacktivist groups are active, including Anonymous Syria Hackers. One such group recently claimed to have breached an Iranian technology firm and released sensitive data, including account credentials, emails, and passwords.
However, these groups remain less visible. Analysts suggest that Israel primarily conducts cyber operations through state-controlled channels, reducing the role and visibility of independent actors. In addition, these groups often do not appear in alerts issued by agencies such as the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, making their activities harder to track.
These developments suggest how cyber operations are becoming embedded in modern warfare. Such attacks are used not only to disrupt infrastructure but also to gather intelligence, impose financial strain, and influence perception.
The growing use of artificial intelligence, combined with the involvement of decentralised and ideologically driven groups, is making attribution more complex and the threat environment more difficult to manage. As a result, cyber capabilities are now a central component of how conflicts are conducted, extending the battlefield into digital systems that underpin everyday life.
.jpg "Hacktivism: How Hacktivists are Using Digital Activism to Fight for Justice")
.jpg "Hacktivism: How Hacktivists are Using Digital Activism to Fight for Justice")
.webp "ICRC issues new rules for hacktivists in war zones: What you need to know")
.webp)
