SMOKEDHAM is a highly adaptable backdoor planted through trojanized software installers and strives via malvertising campaigns. “UNC2465 has leveraged trojanized installers disguised as legitimate tools, such as KeyStore Explorer and Angry IP Scanner, to deliver SMOKEDHAM payloads,” says TRAC Labs.
Once deployed, SMOKEDHAM allows hackers initial entry to a victim’s device, making way for network surveillance, later movements, and deploying ransomware. If we look back, SMOKEDHAM has links with DARKSIDE ransomware, and UNC2465 has now shifted focus to Lockbit ransomware.
When infecting the target system, SMOKEDHAM uses stealthy techniques, this includes DLL side-loading and PowerShell obfuscation.
Manipulating Service: The backdoor changes configurations of Windows services like MSDTC to maintain presence and exploit privileges. “The purpose of running these commands is to later DLL side-load the binary named oci.dll retrieved from the C2 server.”
Trojanized Installers: Distributed through famous platforms like Google Ads, these trojan installers may look legit but contain a malicious SMOKEDHAM payload.
Registry and Batch Script Modifications: Infected scripts run payloads, and configure registry keys for maintaining presence, and also make PowerShell commands for obfuscation.
1. Using tools such as Advanced IP Scanner and Bloodhound to track valuable targets in a compromised network.
2. Credential Harvesting: Extracting login credentials for future exploitation.
3. Escaping Firewall: Using NGROK to leak internal services like RDP to the web, evading network defenses.
“Approximately 6 hours after the execution of the malicious binary on the beachhead host, the threat actors moved laterally to the Domain Controller using WMI,” says TRAC labs.
The SMOKEDHAM backdoor is a living example of sophisticated cyber threats corrupting the cybersecurity industry, with its advanced tools for surveillance, network infiltration, and persistence.
Malvertising refers to the use of online advertisements to spread malware. Unlike traditional phishing attacks, which typically rely on deceiving the user into clicking a malicious link, malvertising can compromise users simply by visiting a site where a malicious ad is displayed. This can lead to a range of cyber threats, including ransomware, data breaches, and financial theft.
The prevalence of malvertising is alarming. Cybercriminals leverage the vast reach of digital ads to target a large number of victims, often without their knowledge. According to NCSC, the complexity of the advertising ecosystem, which involves multiple intermediaries, exacerbates the issue. This makes identifying and blocking malicious ads challenging before they reach the end user.
To combat malvertising, NCSC recommends adopting a defense-in-depth approach. Here are some best practices that organizations can implement:
Several organizations have successfully implemented these best practices and seen significant reductions in malvertising incidents. For example, a major online retailer partnered with a top-tier ad network and implemented comprehensive ad verification tools. As a result, they were able to block over 90% of malicious ads before they reached their customers.
Malvertising, which comes from malicious + advertising involves the use of online advertisements to spread malware. Cybercriminals purchase ad space on legitimate websites, embedding malicious code within the ads. When users click these ads, they are redirected to malicious websites or have malware silently installed on their devices.
The recent campaign showcases the ingenuity of cybercriminals. By targeting dozens of Google products through malicious search ads, scammers managed to deceive users into visiting a fake Google homepage. This fake page, created using Looker Studio, was designed to lock up the browsers of both Windows and Mac users, effectively trapping them in a malicious environment.
The attackers utilized stolen or free accounts and leveraged Google's APIs to generate rotating malicious URLs. This tactic made it difficult for security systems to detect and block malicious ads and ensured a steady stream of potential victims.
1. Ad Placement: Cybercriminals purchased ad space on legitimate platforms, ensuring their malicious ads appeared in search results for popular Google products.
2. Redirection: When users clicked on these ads, they were redirected to a fake Google homepage. This page was meticulously crafted to resemble the genuine Google site, adding a layer of credibility to the scam.
3. Browser Lock: The fake homepage employed scripts to lock the user's browser, preventing them from navigating away or closing the tab. This tactic often creates a sense of urgency and panic, compelling users to follow the attackers' instructions.
4. Rotating URLs: By using Google's APIs, the attackers generated rotating URLs, making it challenging for security systems to blacklist the malicious sites. This ensured the longevity and effectiveness of the campaign.
The impact of such a campaign is far-reaching. Users who fall victim to these scams can experience a range of consequences, from minor annoyances to significant security breaches. The immediate impact includes browser hijacking, which can disrupt productivity and cause frustration. However, the long-term consequences can be more severe, including the installation of malware, theft of personal information, and financial loss.
Malvertising has been a more popular tool employed by cybercriminals in recent years to exploit unsuspecting internet users. When people click on an infected ad, malware is transferred to their computers and mobile devices, which is known as malvertising. Sadly, some contend that Big Tech's corporate policies are facilitating hackers' use of malvertising as a means of infiltrating computer systems.
![]() |
| Photo Courtesy: Malwarebytes |