Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Showing posts with label Music Industry. Show all posts

Spotify Partners with Major Labels to Develop “Responsible” AI Tools that Prioritize Artists’ Rights

 

Spotify, the world’s largest music streaming platform, has revealed that it is collaborating with major record labels to develop artificial intelligence (AI) tools in what it calls a “responsible” manner.

According to the company, the initiative aims to create AI technologies that “put artists and songwriters first” while ensuring full respect for their copyrights. As part of the effort, Spotify will license music from the industry’s leading record labels — Sony Music, Universal Music Group, and Warner Music Group — which together represent the majority of global music content.

Also joining the partnership are rights management company Merlin and digital music firm Believe.

While the specifics of the new AI tools remain under wraps, Spotify confirmed that development is already underway on its first set of products. The company acknowledged that there are “a wide range of views on use of generative music tools within the artistic community” and stated that artists would have the option to decide whether to participate.

The announcement comes amid growing concern from prominent musicians, including Dua Lipa, Sir Elton John, and Sir Paul McCartney, who have criticized AI companies for training generative models on their music without authorization or compensation.

Spotify emphasized that creators and rights holders will be “properly compensated for uses of their work and transparently credited for their contributions.” The firm said this would be done through “upfront agreements” rather than “asking for forgiveness later.”

“Technology should always serve artists, not the other way around,” said Alex Norstrom, Spotify’s co-president.

Not everyone, however, is optimistic. New Orleans-based MidCitizen Entertainment, a music management company, argued that AI has “polluted the creative ecosystem.” Its Managing Partner, Max Bonanno, said that AI-generated tracks have “diluted the already limited share of revenue that artists receive from streaming royalties.”

Conversely, the move was praised by Ed Newton-Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, an organization that advocates for AI companies to respect creators’ rights. “Lots of the AI industry is exploitative — AI built on people's work without permission, served up to users who get no say in the matter,” he told BBC News. “This is different — AI features built fairly, with artists’ permission, presented to fans as a voluntary add-on rather than an inescapable funnel of AI slop. The devil will be in the detail, but it looks like a move towards a more ethical AI industry, which is sorely needed.”

Spotify reiterated that it does not produce any music itself, AI-generated or otherwise. However, it employs AI in personalized features such as “daylist” and its AI DJ, and it hosts AI-generated tracks that comply with its policies. Earlier, the company had removed a viral AI-generated song that used cloned voices of Drake and The Weeknd, citing impersonation concerns.

Spotify also pointed out that AI has already become a fixture in music production — from autotune and mixing to mastering. A notable example was The Beatles’ 2023 Grammy-winning single Now and Then, which used AI to enhance John Lennon’s vocals from an old recording.

Warner Music Group CEO Robert Kyncl expressed support for the collaboration, saying, “We’ve been consistently focused on making sure AI works for artists and songwriters, not against them. That means collaborating with partners who understand the necessity for new AI licensing deals that protect and compensate rightsholders and the creative community.”

Music Streaming Royalties To Be Examined by The UK Government

 


Since the early days of the music industry, musicians, writers, and other creatives have spoken out about the unfairness of royalty share payments. This is when their works are played on Spotify and Apple Music. There will be a discussion of these issues within the government after an investigation was conducted in 2019. 

To investigate suggestions that the music streaming industry is not remunerated fairly for artists, the government is investigating the streaming industry. Musicians and artists are worried that they are not receiving as much money as record labels when their tracks are played on streaming services like Spotify, as there are concerns that their tracks may be stolen. 

It is essential to provide high-quality metadata for a track in the era of digital music to ensure that the people who contributed to the creation of a track are accurately credited and compensated. This is the most effective way to ensure music makers are properly credited. The metadata for songwriters and their works, however, lacks precision and completeness. It is often out of date or incomplete, especially regarding specifics. In some cases, insufficient or incorrect metadata can cause a significant delay in creators' payment for the use of their work. In some cases, no payment to the creators at all. 

There have recently been meetings brought together by experts from across the UK music industry. These meetings were to develop positive steps for improving music metadata for everyone involved. 

Despite many aspects of metadata provision working well, and positive steps taken by several industry participants to improve it, there are still significant challenges to be overcome in several areas. To achieve this, it is essential that data is collected from creators promptly and that industry-standard identifiers are adopted and made accessible, particularly regarding metadata associated with work and songwriters. This is especially true of the links between sound recordings and musical works. 

The report has also stated that there have been reports that session musicians have not been paid for streams. This issue will be investigated by a working group of industry representatives tasked with looking into these concerns. There has been an investigation by the government into streaming music since 2019, and an imbalance in royalties was discussed in 2021 as the cause of the investigation. 

A member of the Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport (DCMS) Select Committee, who is investigating the music industry on behalf of the government, has said that she considers this a "welcome step towards understanding the frustrations of musicians and songwriters whose pay often falls below a fair level." 

Despite this, she added, the talk shop should produce concrete change and not just an opportunity for "talking heads to talk". Nile Rodgers, a guitarist, producer, and songwriter who helped create the music for the film Goodfellas, will be addressing the government in 2020. Among the royalties record labels receive as a result of streaming services, he said that they should keep up to 82% of the proceeds.

Earlier this year, Sir John Whittingdale, the minister for creative industries, described the project as a way of offering the UK an "enriching career opportunity".

As he went on to say, "This exceptional agreement on streaming metadata is an important step forward in making sure the contributions and creativity of UK musicians in the digital age are considered and fairly compensated for their contributions and creativity." 

Former chief economist at Spotify, Will Page, said music business officials are at the moment debating the way the money is being allocated in the industry. According to Page, if artists get to receive even 1% of what is generated in the United Kingdom through streams, they are also entitled to receive any cash generated there. 

A certain amount is not paid to the artist every time a song is heard on Spotify, because the artist is not paid a certain amount per instance that the song is played. 

Depending on the way the music is streamed and the rights that are held by labels or distributors, royalties that artists receive may differ depending on the agreement they have with the label or distributor or the way their music is distributed. 

To conclude, the UK government's decision to investigate streaming royalties for music is a great step forward in the direction of resolving long-standing issues regarding the streaming of music. 

As a result of digital streaming platforms, how music is consumed has changed greatly in recent years. However, it has also brought forth several challenges, especially when it comes to fair compensation for songwriters and artists who work on those platforms. 

With the government's initiative to examine streaming royalties, the government recognizes that right now, in this rapidly evolving landscape, it is critical to ensure that revenues are distributed more equitably. Record labels and streaming platforms have been criticized for disproportionately benefitting from the current royalty model, which is described as a rip-off. A songwriter or artist who is creating a song may receive minimal compensation for their work, while the artists receive no compensation at all. 

Taking this action by the UK government is a strong statement that the government is listening to the concerns of artists, songwriters, and musicians. It also states that their concerns are addressed. Throughout the document, all parties involved in the music industry are urged to create an ecosystem that supports sustainable and fair business. This is where everyone can survive and thrive. 

As part of the investigation, existing legislation on music streaming royalties will likely be examined in detail. In addition, license agreements and the dynamics of power between stakeholders and the industry.

Furthermore, the company might also explore alternative models, such as user-centric payment systems. These systems aim to ensure that royalties are distributed directly based on an individual user's listening habits, rather than pooling their revenues and distributing them randomly to each user.

It is anticipated that the outcome of this investigation will ultimately lead to reshaping the music industry in a way that is more transparent and equitable for artists and songwriters while also creating a more competitive environment for them. If there were reforms to reflect the value of creative work and to provide artists with more sustainable income streams resulting from that, that would be of great benefit to all. 

No doubt finding a solution to this complex issue will not be easy, however, and that will prolong the issue. There will also be a need for careful deliberation and collaboration between the interests of artists, songwriters, streaming platforms, and consumers in balancing these interests. Although, it is a positive development to see the UK government take action to address these concerns, which may have a lasting impact on the global music industry in the long run. 

Having made this decision, the UK government has achieved a significant milestone in its ongoing efforts to transform the music ecosystem into a more sustainable and fairer one exemplified by its decision to examine music streaming royalties. In essence, it is a step towards ensuring that artists and songwriters receive their fair share of revenues in the digital age, and to foster and sustain an industry that is thriving both for creators and for consumers, benefiting both of them.