Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Showing posts with label phishing. Show all posts

Attackers Hijack Microsoft Email Accounts to Launch Phishing Campaign Against Energy Firms

 


Cybercriminals have compromised Microsoft email accounts belonging to organizations in the energy sector and used those trusted inboxes to distribute large volumes of phishing emails. In at least one confirmed incident, more than 600 malicious messages were sent from a single hijacked account.

Microsoft security researchers explained that the attackers did not rely on technical exploits or system vulnerabilities. Instead, they gained access by using legitimate login credentials that were likely stolen earlier through unknown means. This allowed them to sign in as real users, making the activity harder to detect.

The attack began with emails that appeared routine and business-related. These messages included Microsoft SharePoint links and subject lines suggesting formal documents, such as proposals or confidentiality agreements. To view the files, recipients were asked to authenticate their accounts.

When users clicked the SharePoint link, they were redirected to a fraudulent website designed to look legitimate. The site prompted them to enter their Microsoft login details. By doing so, victims unknowingly handed over valid usernames and passwords to the attackers.

After collecting credentials, the attackers accessed the compromised email accounts from different IP addresses. They then created inbox rules that automatically deleted incoming emails and marked messages as read. This step helped conceal the intrusion and prevented account owners from noticing unusual activity.

Using these compromised inboxes, the attackers launched a second wave of phishing emails. These messages were sent not only to external contacts but also to colleagues and internal distribution lists. Recipients were selected based on recent email conversations found in the victim’s inbox, increasing the likelihood that the messages would appear trustworthy.

In this campaign, the attackers actively monitored inbox responses. They removed automated replies such as out-of-office messages and undeliverable notices. They also read replies from recipients and responded to questions about the legitimacy of the emails. All such exchanges were later deleted to erase evidence.

Any employee within an energy organization who interacted with the malicious links was also targeted for credential theft, allowing the attackers to expand their access further.

Microsoft confirmed that the activity began in January and described it as a short-duration, multi-stage phishing operation that was quickly disrupted. The company did not disclose how many organizations were affected, identify the attackers, or confirm whether the campaign is still active.

Security experts warn that simply resetting passwords may not be enough in these attacks. Because attackers can interfere with multi-factor authentication settings, they may maintain access even after credentials are changed. For example, attackers can register their own device to receive one-time authentication codes.

Despite these risks, multi-factor authentication remains a critical defense against account compromise. Microsoft also recommends using conditional access controls that assess login attempts based on factors such as location, device health, and user role. Suspicious sign-ins can then be blocked automatically.

Additional protection can be achieved by deploying anti-phishing solutions that scan emails and websites for malicious activity. These measures, combined with user awareness, are essential as attackers increasingly rely on stolen identities rather than software flaws.


Fake DHL Pickup Slips Used in QR Code Phishing Scam

 

Criminals are using fake DHL pickup slips to carry out a new phishing scam that targets customers during periods of high online shopping activity, according to the company. 

The scam involves counterfeit versions of DHL’s familiar yellow delivery notices, which are typically left when a parcel cannot be delivered. Unlike genuine slips, the fake notices contain a QR code that prompts recipients to scan it to arrange a redelivery. 

Scanning the code redirects users to a fraudulent website designed to closely resemble DHL’s official site. Victims are then asked to enter personal information, including names, addresses and bank details, which can be used for financial fraud and identity theft. 

The tactic is part of a broader trend known as “quishing,” a form of phishing that relies on QR codes rather than email links. These scams are increasingly being spread through physical notices, emails, text messages and fake social media accounts. 

Jens-Uwe Hogardt, a spokesperson for DHL, said such fraud attempts are becoming more sophisticated and harder to detect. He noted that official DHL communications are sent only from verified email domains such as “@dhl.com” or “@dhl.de,” and that legitimate messages do not originate from generic email services. 

DHL advises customers to track parcels only through its official website or mobile app and to avoid scanning QR codes from unsolicited delivery notices. 

Users who believe they have been targeted are urged to contact local police and DHL customer service, change passwords immediately and refrain from sharing personal or financial details through unknown links. 

"If you suspect having received fraudulent emails, SMS or found a website or social media account that tries to pass off as DHL, we encourage you to let us know at your earliest convenience, so that we can quickly take actions to stop the fraud," DHL posted. 

Authorities and companies continue to warn that vigilance is especially important during peak shopping seasons, when delivery-related scams tend to increase.

2FA Fail: Hackers Exploit Microsoft 365 to Launch Code Phishing Attacks


Two-factor authentication (2FA) has been one of the most secure ways to protect online accounts. It requires a secondary code besides a password. However, in recent times, 2FA has not been a reliable method anymore, as hackers have started exploiting it easily. 

Experts advise users to use passkeys instead of 2FA these days, as they are more secure and less prone to hack attempts. Recent reports have shown that 2FA as a security method is undermined. 

Russian-linked state sponsored threat actors are now abusing flaws in Microsoft’s 365. Experts from Proofpoint have noticed a surge in Microsoft 365 account takeover cyberattacks, threat actors are exploiting authentication code phishing to compromise Microsoft’s device authorization flow.

They are also launching advanced phishing campaigns that escape 2FA and hack sensitive accounts. 

About the attack

The recent series of cyberattacks use device code phishing where hackers lure victims into giving their authentication codes on fake websites that look real. When the code is entered, hackers gain entry to the victim's Microsoft 365 account, escaping the safety of 2FA. 

The campaigns started in early 2025. In the beginning, hackers relied primarily on code phishing. By March, they increased their tactics to exploit Oauth authentication workflows, which are largely used for signing into apps and services. The development shows how fast threat actors adapt when security experts find their tricks.

Who is the victim? 

The attacks are particularly targeted against high-value sectors that include:

Universities and research institutes 

Defense contractors

Energy providers

Government agencies 

Telecommunication companies 

By targeting these sectors, hackers increase the impact of their attacks for purposes such as disruption, espionage, and financial motives. 

The impact 

The surge in 2FA code attacks exposes a major gap, no security measure is foolproof. While 2FA is still far stronger than relying on passwords alone, it can be undermined if users are deceived into handing over their codes. This is not a failure of the technology itself, but of human trust and awareness.  

A single compromised account can expose sensitive emails, documents, and internal systems. Users are at risk of losing their personal data, financial information, and even identity in these cases.

How to Stay Safe

Verify URLs carefully. Never enter authentication codes on unfamiliar or suspicious websites.  

Use phishing-resistant authentication. Hardware security keys (like YubiKeys) or biometric logins are harder to trick.  

Enable conditional access policies. Organizations can restrict logins based on location, device, or risk level.  

Monitor OAuth activity. Be cautious of unexpected consent requests from apps or services.  

Educate users. Awareness training is often the most effective defense against social engineering.  


Antivirus vs Identity Protection Software: What to Choose and How?


Users often put digital security into a single category and confuse identity protection with antivirus, assuming both work the same. But they are not. Before you buy one, it is important to understand the difference between the two. This blog covers the difference between identity theft security and device security.

Cybersecurity threats: Past vs present 

Traditionally, a common computer virus could crash a machine and infect a few files. That was it. But today, the cybersecurity landscape has changed from compromising computers via system overload of resources to stealing personal data. 

A computer virus is a malware that self-replicates, travelling through devices. It corrupts data and software, and can also steal personal data. 

With time, hackers have learned that users are easier targets than computers. These days, malware and social engineering attacks pose more threats than viruses. A well planned phishing email or a fake login page will benefit hackers more than a traditional virus. 

Due to the surge in data breaches, hackers have got it easy. Your data- phone number, financial details, passwords is swimming in databases, sold like bulk goods on the dark web. 

AI has made things worse and easier to exploit. Hackers can now create believable messages and even impersonate your voice. These shenanigans don't even require creativity, they need to be convincing enough to bait a victim to click or reply. 

Where antivirus fails

Your personal data never stays only on your computer, it is collected and sold by data brokers and advertisers, or to third-parties who benefit from it. When threat actors get their hands on this data, they can use it to impersonate you. 

In this case, antivirus is of no help. It is unable to notice breaches happening at organizations you don't control or someone impersonating you. Antivirus protects your system from malware that exists outside your system. There is a limit to what it can do. Antivirus can protect the machine, but not the user behind it. 

Role of identity theft protection 

Identity protection doesn't concern itself with your system health. It looks out for information that follows you everywhere- SSN, e-mail addresses, your contact number and accounts linked to your finances. If something suspicious turns up, it informs you. Identity protection works more on the monitoring side. It may watch your credit reports for threats- a new account or a hard enquiry, or falling credit score. Identity protection software looks out for early warning signs of theft, as mentioned above. It also checks if your data has been put up on dark web or part of any latest leaks. 

FBI Warns of Cybercriminals Impersonating IC3 to Steal Personal Data

 

The FBI has issued a public service announcement warning that cybercriminals are impersonating the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) and even cloning its website to steal victims’ personal and financial data.Attackers are exploiting public trust in federal law enforcement by creating fake IC3-branded domains and lookalike reporting portals, then driving victims to these sites via phishing emails, messages, and search engine manipulation so people think they are filing a legitimate cybercrime report. 

The alert—referenced as PSA I-091925—describes threat actors spoofing the official IC3 website and related communications, with the goal of harvesting names, home addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, and banking details under the pretext of gathering evidence for an investigation or helping recover lost funds.The FBI stresses that visiting these fake sites or responding to unsolicited “IC3” outreach could lead not only to identity theft and financial fraud but also to further compromise through follow‑on scams using the stolen data.

Security experts situates this campaign within a broader surge in impersonation attacks, noting that law enforcement, government agencies, and major brands have all been targets of cloned sites and spoofed communications, often enhanced by AI to appear more convincing. It highlights that scammers may blend IC3 impersonation with other fraud patterns, such as bogus refund or recovery services, “phantom hacker” style tech‑support narratives, or messages claiming to fix account compromises, all framed as official FBI assistance. 

The FBI has issued guidelines to safeguard Americans from phishing campaign. The real IC3 does not charge fees, will never ask for payment or direct victims to third‑party companies to recover funds, and does not operate any official presence on social media. Genuine IC3 reporting should be done only through the official ic3.gov domain, accessed by typing the URL directly into the browser or using trusted bookmarks, rather than clicking on links in unsolicited messages or search ads. 

Additionally, to mitigate risk the FBI recommends treating any unexpected communication claiming to be from the FBI or IC3 with skepticism, independently verify contact details through official channels, and avoid sharing sensitive information or making payments based on pressure tactics. It closes by urging individuals and organizations to train staff on recognizing impersonation scams, double‑check domains and email addresses, and promptly report suspected fake FBI or IC3 activity using confirmed, legitimate FBI contact points.

Hackers Use Look-Alike Domain Trick to Imitate Microsoft and Capture User Credentials

 




A new phishing operation is misleading users through an extremely subtle visual technique that alters the appearance of Microsoft’s domain name. Attackers have registered the look-alike address “rnicrosoft(.)com,” which replaces the single letter m with the characters r and n positioned closely together. The small difference is enough to trick many people into believing they are interacting with the legitimate site.

This method is a form of typosquatting where criminals depend on how modern screens display text. Email clients and browsers often place r and n so closely that the pair resembles an m, leading the human eye to automatically correct the mistake. The result is a domain that appears trustworthy at first glance although it has no association with the actual company.

Experts note that phishing messages built around this tactic often copy Microsoft’s familiar presentation style. Everything from symbols to formatting is imitated to encourage users to act without closely checking the URL. The campaign takes advantage of predictable reading patterns where the brain prioritizes recognition over detail, particularly when the user is scanning quickly.

The deception becomes stronger on mobile screens. Limited display space can hide the entire web address and the address bar may shorten or disguise the domain. Criminals use this opportunity to push malicious links, deliver invoices that look genuine, or impersonate internal departments such as HR teams. Once a victim believes the message is legitimate, they are more likely to follow the link or download a harmful attachment.

The “rn” substitution is only one example of a broader pattern. Typosquatting groups also replace the letter o with the number zero, add hyphens to create official-sounding variations, or register sites with different top level domains that resemble the original brand. All of these are intended to mislead users into entering passwords or sending sensitive information.

Security specialists advise users to verify every unexpected message before interacting with it. Expanding the full sender address exposes inconsistencies that the display name may hide. Checking links by hovering over them, or using long-press previews on mobile devices, can reveal whether the destination is legitimate. Reviewing email headers, especially the Reply-To field, can also uncover signs that responses are being redirected to an external mailbox controlled by attackers.

When an email claims that a password reset or account change is required, the safest approach is to ignore the provided link. Instead, users should manually open a new browser tab and visit the official website. Organisations are encouraged to conduct repeated security awareness exercises so employees do not react instinctively to familiar-looking alerts.


Below are common variations used in these attacks:

Letter Pairing: r and n are combined to imitate m as seen in rnicrosoft(.)com.

Number Replacement: the letter o is switched with the number zero in addresses like micros0ft(.)com.

Added Hyphens: attackers introduce hyphens to create domains that appear official, such as microsoft-support(.)com.

Domain Substitution: similar names are created by altering only the top level domain, for example microsoft(.)co.


This phishing strategy succeeds because it relies on human perception rather than technical flaws. Recognising these small changes and adopting consistent verification habits remain the most effective protections against such attacks.



Smarter Scams, Sharper Awareness: How to Recognize and Prevent Financial Fraud in the Digital Age




Fraud has evolved into a calculated industry powered by technology, psychology, and precision targeting. Gone are the days when scams could be spotted through broken English or unrealistic offers alone. Today’s fraudsters combine emotional pressure with digital sophistication, creating schemes that appear legitimate and convincing. Understanding how these scams work, and knowing how to respond, is essential for protecting your family’s hard-earned savings.


The Changing Nature of Scams

Modern scams are not just technical traps, they are psychological manipulations. Criminals no longer rely solely on phishing links or counterfeit banking apps. They now use social engineering tactics, appealing to trust, fear, or greed. A scam might start with a call pretending to be from a government agency, an email about a limited investment opportunity, or a message warning that your bank account is at risk. Each of these is designed to create panic or urgency so that victims act before they think.

A typical fraud cycle follows a simple pattern: an urgent message, a seemingly legitimate explanation, and a request for sensitive action, such as sharing a one-time password, installing a new app, or transferring funds “temporarily” to another account. Once the victim complies, the attacker vanishes, leaving financial and emotional loss behind.

Experts note that the most dangerous scams often appear credible because they mimic official communication styles, use verified-looking logos, and even operate fake customer support numbers. The sophistication makes these schemes particularly hard to spot, especially for first-time investors or non-technical individuals.


Key Red Flags You Should Never Ignore

1. Unrealistic returns or guarantees: If a company claims you can make quick, risk-free profits or shows charts with consistent gains, it’s likely a setup. Real investments fluctuate; only scammers promise certainty.

2. Pressure to act immediately: Whether it’s “only minutes left to invest” or “pay now to avoid penalties,” urgency is a manipulative tactic designed to prevent logical evaluation.

3. Requests to switch apps or accounts: Authentic businesses never ask customers to transfer funds into personal or unfamiliar accounts or to download unverified applications.

4. Emotional storylines: Fraudsters know how to exploit emotions. They may pretend to be in love, offer fake job opportunities, or issue fabricated legal threats, all aimed at overriding rational thinking.

5. Asking for security codes or OTPs: No genuine financial institution or digital platform will ever ask for these details. Sharing them gives scammers direct access to your accounts.


Simple Steps to Build Financial Safety

Protection from scams starts with discipline and awareness rather than advanced technology.

• Take a moment before responding. Don’t act out of panic. Pause, think, and verify before clicking or transferring money.

• Verify independently. If a message or call appears urgent, reach out to the organization using contact details from their official website, not from the message itself.

• Activate alerts and monitor accounts. Keep an eye on all transactions. Early detection of suspicious activity can prevent larger losses.

• Use multi-layered security. Enable multi-factor authentication on all major financial accounts, preferably using hardware security keys or authentication apps instead of SMS codes.

• Keep your digital environment clean. Regularly update your devices, operating systems, and browsers, and use trusted antivirus software to block potential malware.

• Install apps only from reliable sources. Avoid downloading apps or investment platforms shared through personal messages or unverified websites.

• Educate your family. Many scam victims are older adults who may hesitate to talk about it. Encourage open communication and make sure they know how to recognize suspicious requests.


Awareness Is the New Security

Technology gives fraudsters global reach, but it also equips users with tools to fight back. Secure authentication systems, anti-phishing filters, and real-time transaction alerts are valuable but they work best when combined with personal vigilance.

Think of security like investment diversification: no single tool provides complete protection. A strong defense requires a mix of cautious behavior, verification habits, and awareness of evolving threats.


Your Takeaway

Scammers are adapting faster than ever, blending emotional manipulation with technical skill. The best way to counter them is to slow down, question everything that seems urgent or “too good to miss,” and confirm information before taking action.

Protecting your family’s financial wellbeing isn’t just about saving or investing wisely, it’s about staying alert, informed, and proactive. Remember: genuine institutions will never rush you, threaten you, or ask for confidential information. The smartest investment today is in your awareness.


Passkeys vs Passwords: Why Passkeys Are the Future of Secure Logins

 

Passwords have long served as the keys to our digital world—granting access to everything from social media to banking apps. Yet, like physical keys, they can easily be lost, copied, or stolen. As cyber threats evolve, new alternatives such as passkeys are stepping in to offer stronger, simpler, and safer ways to log in.

Why passwords remain risky

A password is essentially a secret code you use to prove your identity online. But weak password habits are widespread. A CyberNews report revealed that 94% of 19 billion leaked passwords were reused, and many followed predictable patterns—think “123456,” names, cities, or popular brands.

When breaches occur, these passwords spread rapidly, leading to account takeovers, phishing scams, and identity theft. In fact, hackers often attempt to exploit leaked credentials within an hour of a breach.

Phishing attacks—where users are tricked into entering their passwords on fake websites—continue to rise, with more than 3 billion phishing emails sent daily worldwide.

Experts recommend creating unique, complex passwords or even memorable passphrases like “CrocApplePurseBike.” Associating it with a story can help you recall it easily.

Enter passkeys: a new way to log in

Emerging around four years ago, passkeys use public-key cryptography, a process that creates two linked keys—one public and one private.

  • The public key is shared with the website.

  • The private key stays safely stored on your device.

When you log in, your device signs a unique challenge using the private key, confirming your identity without sending any password. To authorize this action, you’ll usually verify with your fingerprint or face ID, ensuring that only you can access your accounts.

Even if the public key is stolen, it’s useless without the private one—making passkeys inherently phishing-proof and more secure. Each passkey is also unique to the website, so it can’t be reused elsewhere.

Why passkeys are better

Passkeys eliminate the need to remember passwords or type them manually. Since they’re tied to your device and require biometric approval, they’re both more convenient and more secure.

However, the technology isn’t yet universal. Compatibility issues between platforms like Apple and Microsoft have slowed adoption, though these gaps are closing as newer devices and systems improve integration.

The road ahead

From a cybersecurity perspective, passkeys are clearly the superior option—they’re stronger, resistant to phishing, and easy to use. But widespread adoption will take time. Many websites still rely on traditional passwords, and transitioning millions of users will be a long process.

Until then, maintaining good password hygiene remains essential: use unique passwords for every account, enable multi-factor authentication, and change any reused credentials immediately.

Arctic Wolf Report Reveals IT Leaders’ Overconfidence Despite Rising Phishing and AI Data Risks

 

A new report from Arctic Wolf highlights troubling contradictions in how IT leaders perceive and respond to cybersecurity threats. Despite growing exposure to phishing and malware attacks, many remain overly confident in their organization’s ability to withstand them — even when their own actions tell a different story.  

According to the report, nearly 70% of IT leaders have been targeted in cyberattacks, with 39% encountering phishing, 35% experiencing malware, and 31% facing social engineering attempts. Even so, more than three-quarters expressed confidence that their organizations would not fall victim to a phishing attack. This overconfidence is concerning, particularly as many of these leaders admitted to clicking on phishing links themselves. 

Arctic Wolf, known for its endpoint security and managed detection and response (MDR) solutions, also analyzed global breach trends across regions. The findings revealed that Australia and New Zealand recorded the sharpest surge in data breaches, rising from 56% in 2024 to 78% in 2025. Meanwhile, the United States reported stable breach rates, Nordic countries saw a slight decline, and Canada experienced a marginal increase. 

The study, based on responses from 1,700 IT professionals including leaders and employees, also explored how organizations are handling AI adoption and data governance. Alarmingly, 60% of IT leaders admitted to sharing confidential company data with generative AI tools like ChatGPT — an even higher rate than the 41% of lower-level employees who reported doing the same.  

While 57% of lower-level staff said their companies had established policies on generative AI use, 43% either doubted or were unaware of any such rules. Researchers noted that this lack of awareness and inconsistent communication reflects a major policy gap. Arctic Wolf emphasized that organizations must not only implement clear AI usage policies but also train employees on the data and network security risks these technologies introduce. 

The report further noted that nearly 60% of organizations fear AI tools could leak sensitive or proprietary data, and about half expressed concerns over potential misuse. Arctic Wolf’s findings underscore a growing disconnect between security perception and reality. 

As cyber threats evolve — particularly through phishing and AI misuse — complacency among IT leaders could prove dangerous. The report concludes that sustained awareness training, consistent policy enforcement, and stronger data protection strategies are critical to closing this widening security gap.

ClickFix Attack Tricks Users into Infecting Their Own Devices

 

Cybercriminals are increasingly using a social engineering attack called ClickFix, which manipulates victims into unknowingly initiating cyberattacks on their own systems. According to Microsoft’s 2025 Digital Defense Report, ClickFix has become the most common initial access technique, recorded in 47% of attacks tracked by Microsoft Defender Experts over the past year. This rise is largely attributed to attackers’ growing ability to bypass traditional anti-phishing protections and successfully exploit human behavior.

What is ClickFix?

ClickFix is a deceptive tactic that capitalizes on users' desire to solve perceived simple technical problems. It typically starts with a phishing email or fraudulent website designed to look like a legitimate service—one notable example was seen in spoofed Booking.com emails during the 2024 holiday season. 

The victim is prompted through a fake notification to resolve an issue, often by copying and pasting a code snippet or clicking through a sequence mimicking technical support instructions. Unbeknownst to the user, these instructions result in executing malicious PowerShell or mshta.exe commands, which launch malware directly into system memory—bypassing the need for a downloaded file and evading common antivirus solutions.

Changing threat landscape

ClickFix is especially concerning because it reflects a broader shift in cybercriminal tactics: exploiting human psychology over technical vulnerabilities. Security vendors highlight that this trend is amplified by the use of artificial intelligence, which enables attackers to craft highly convincing phishing lures and even simulate full conversation threads for business email compromise schemes. 

The payloads delivered through ClickFix attacks are diverse and dangerous, including ransomware, information stealers, remote access trojans (RATs), and worms such as Xorm, Danabot, and NetSupport RAT. Reports from security vendors indicate a 500% surge in ClickFix incidents in the first half of 2025, making up an estimated 8% of all attacks during that period.

Defense strategies and user awareness

Traditional defenses based on blocking suspicious attachments, network traffic, or sender domains cannot reliably stop ClickFix. Instead, organizations and individuals must focus on behavioral change: never follow unsolicited technical instructions without independent verification, and always treat requests for manual intervention—like pasting unfamiliar code—with skepticism.

Security awareness training and updated incident response plans are crucial for combating this new wave of attacks. As threat actors continue to refine their methods, education and skepticism remain the frontline defenses against self-induced cyber threats.

Fake Breach Alerts Target LastPass and Bitwarden Users to Hijack PCs

 

An ongoing phishing campaign is targeting users of LastPass and Bitwarden with fake breach alerts designed to install remote access tools on victims’ systems. The emails falsely claim that both password managers suffered security incidents and urge users to download a “more secure” desktop application to protect their data.

LastPass confirmed it was not hacked and labeled the messages as social engineering attempts meant to create urgency and prompt users to install malicious software. The campaign began over a holiday weekend to exploit reduced IT staffing and delay detection. Fake emails were sent from domains like hello@lastpasspulse[.]blog and hello@lastpasjournal[.]blog, mimicking official communication.

Similarly, Bitwarden users received nearly identical messages from hello@bitwardenbroadcast.blog, using the same urgent tone and lure of a secure desktop app update. Cloudflare has since blocked the phishing landing pages, identifying them as malicious.

The downloaded binaries install Syncro, a legitimate remote monitoring and management (RMM) tool, which then deploys ScreenConnect to enable remote access to the infected device. The Syncro agent is configured to hide its system tray icon and check in with the attacker’s server every 90 seconds, maintaining stealth. It disables security agents from Emsisoft, Webroot, and Bitdefender and avoids deploying other bundled tools like Splashtop or TeamViewer, focusing solely on gaining remote control.

Once connected via ScreenConnect, attackers can deploy additional malware, exfiltrate data, and access stored credentials from password managers. Syncro clarified that its platform was not breached; instead, attackers created a fraudulent MSP account to abuse the service. A separate phishing wave targeted 1Password users with similar tactics, redirecting them to onepass-word[.]com through a malicious email sent from watchtower@eightninety[.]com. 

Cybersecurity experts stress that users should never respond to such alerts via email and should verify security news only through official company websites and communications. Companies do not request master passwords, and any such demand is a definitive sign of phishing.

Phishing Campaign Uses Fake PyPI Domain to Steal Login Credentials


Phishing campaign via fake domains

A highly advanced phishing campaign targeted maintainers of packages on the Python Package Index (PyPI), utilizing domain confusion methods to obtain login credentials from unsuspecting developers. The campaign leverages fake emails made to copy authentic PyPI communications and send recipients to fake domains that mimic the genuine PyPI infrastructure.

Campaign tactic

The phishing operation uses meticulously drafted emails that ask users to confirm their email address for “account maintenance and security reasons,” cautioning that accounts will be suspended if not done. 

These fake emails scare users, pushing them to make hasty decisions without confirming the authenticity of the communication. The phony emails redirect the victims to the malicious domain pypi-mirror.org, which mimics the genuine PyPI mirror but is not linked to the Python Software Foundation.

Broader scheme 

This phishing campaign highlights a series of attacks that have hit PyPi and similar other open-source repositories recently. Hackers have started changing domain names to avoid getting caught. 

Experts at PyPI said that these campaigns are part of a larger domain-confusion attack to abuse the trust relationship inside the open-source ecosystem.

The campaign uses technical deception and social engineering. When users open the malicious links, their credentials are stolen by the hackers. 

Domain confusion

The core of this campaign depends upon domain spoofing. The fake domain uses HTTPS encoding and sophisticated web design to build its authority, which tricks users who might not pay close attention while accessing these sites. The malicious sites mimic PyPI’s login page with stark reality, such as professional logos, form elements, and styling, giving users an authentic experience. 

This level of detail in the craft highlights robust planning and resource use by threat actors to increase the campaign’s effectiveness.

How to stay safe?

Users are advised to not open malicious links and pay attention while using websites, especially when putting in login details. 

“If you have already clicked on the link and provided your credentials, we recommend changing your password on PyPI immediately. Inspect your account's Security History for anything unexpected. Report suspicious activity, such as potential phishing campaigns against PyPI, to security@pypi.org,” PyPI said in the blog post.

Phishing Expands Beyond Email: Why New Tactics Demand New Defences

 


Phishing has long been associated with deceptive emails, but attackers are now widening their reach. Malicious links are increasingly being delivered through social media, instant messaging platforms, text messages, and even search engine ads. This shift is reshaping the way organisations must think about defence.


From the inbox to every app

Work used to be confined to company networks and email inboxes, which made security controls easier to enforce. Today’s workplace is spread across cloud platforms, SaaS tools, and dozens of communication channels. Employees are accessible through multiple apps, and each one creates new openings for attackers.

Links no longer arrive only in email. Adversaries exploit WhatsApp, LinkedIn, Signal, SMS, and even in-app messaging, often using legitimate SaaS accounts to bypass email filters. With enterprises relying on hundreds of apps with varying security settings, the attack surface has grown dramatically.


Why detection lags behind

Phishing that occurs outside email is rarely reported because most industry data comes from email security vendors. If the email layer is bypassed, companies must rely heavily on user reports. Web proxies offer limited coverage, but advanced phishing kits now use obfuscation techniques, such as altering webpage code or hiding scripts to disguise what the browser is actually displaying.

Even when spotted, non-email phishing is harder to contain. A malicious post on social media cannot be recalled or blocked for all employees like an email. Attackers also rotate domains quickly, rendering URL blocks ineffective.


Personal and corporate boundaries blur

Another challenge is the overlap of personal and professional accounts. Staff routinely log into LinkedIn, X, WhatsApp, or Reddit on work devices. Malicious ads placed on search engines also appear credible to employees browsing for company resources.

This overlap makes corporate compromise more likely. Stolen credentials from personal accounts can provide access to business systems. In one high-profile incident in 2023, an employee’s personal Google profile synced credentials from a work device. When the personal device was breached, it exposed a support account linked to more than a hundred customers.


Real-world campaigns

Recent campaigns illustrate the trend. On LinkedIn, attackers used compromised executive accounts to promote fake investment opportunities, luring targets through legitimate services like Google Sites before leading them to phishing pages designed to steal Google Workspace credentials.

In another case, malicious Google ads appeared above genuine login pages. Victims were tricked into entering details on counterfeit sites hosted on convincing subdomains, later tied to a campaign by the Scattered Spider group.


The bigger impact of one breach

A compromised account grants far more than access to email. With single sign-on integrations, attackers can reach multiple connected applications, from collaboration tools to customer databases. This enables lateral movement within organisations, escalating a single breach into a widespread incident.

Traditional email filters are no longer enough. Security teams need solutions that monitor browser behaviour directly, detect attempts to steal credentials in real time, and block attacks regardless of where the link originates. In addition, enforcing multi-factor authentication, reducing unnecessary syncing across devices, and educating employees about phishing outside of email remain critical steps.

Phishing today is about targeting identity, not just inboxes. Organisations that continue to see it as an email-only problem risk being left unprepared against attackers who have already moved on.


Massive NPM Supply-Chain Attack Reaches Millions, Nets Hackers Less Than $1,000

 

The largest supply-chain attack in NPM ecosystem history impacted approximately 10% of cloud environments after attackers compromised maintainer Josh Junon's account through a phishing campaign, yet generated minimal profits for the perpetrators. 

The attack began when Junon fell victim to a password reset phishing lure, allowing threat actors to access his NPM account and push malicious updates to highly popular packages including chalk and debug-js, which collectively receive over 2.6 billion weekly downloads. The attackers embedded cryptocurrency-stealing malware that redirected Ethereum and Solana transactions to attacker-controlled wallets.

The compromise's reach was staggering, with Wiz security researchers finding that the targeted packages served as fundamental building blocks in 99% of cloud environments. During the two-hour window before discovery and removal, the malicious packages were downloaded by roughly 10% of cloud environments, demonstrating the rapid propagation potential of supply-chain attacks. 

Despite the massive scale and widespread impact, the attackers' financial gains were surprisingly modest. Security Alliance analysis revealed the malicious code specifically targeted browser environments, hooking cryptocurrency signing requests to perform crypto-jacking operations. The attackers managed to steal only five cents worth of ETH and $20 of an obscure memecoin initially.

Socket researchers later expanded the investigation, discovering the same phishing campaign had compromised DuckDB's maintainer account with identical crypto-stealing code. Their comprehensive analysis traced total profits across all attacker wallets to approximately $429 in Ethereum, $46 in Solana, and small amounts in Bitcoin, Tron, Bitcoin Cash, and Litecoin, totaling roughly $600 . 

The limited payload targeting only cryptocurrency transactions likely prevented a more catastrophic security incident. Attackers could have deployed reverse shells, facilitated lateral network movement, or installed destructive malware given their privileged access . 

 
While companies invested significant hours in cleanup, rebuilding, and security auditing following the incident, the actual security implications remained minimal. The attacker wallets containing substantial amounts have been flagged by security services, further limiting the perpetrators' ability to convert or utilize their meager gains. 

This incident highlights both the vulnerability of open-source ecosystems to social engineering attacks and the potential for widespread impact even when financial motivation proves unsuccessful.

MostereRAT Malware Leverages Evasion Tactics to Foil Defenders

 


Despite the fact that cybercrime has become increasingly sophisticated over the years, security researchers have uncovered a stealthy phishing campaign in which a powerful malware strain called MostereRAT was deployed. This remote access trojan allows attackers to take full control of infected systems in the same way they would normally operate them, as though they were physically a part of them. 

It has recently been revealed that the campaign is being carried out by Fortinet's FortiGuard Labs using an array of advanced evasion techniques to bypass traditional defenses and remain undetected for extended periods of time. This operation was characterized by the unconventional use of Easy Programming Language (EPL) as a visual programming tool in China that is seldom used to carry out such operations. 

Through its use, staged payloads were constructed, malicious activity was obscured, and security systems were systematically disabled. Researchers report that these phishing emails, which are primarily targeted at Japanese users with business related lures, have been shown to lead victims to booby-trapped documents embedded within ZIP archives, and this ultimately allowed the deployment of MostereRAT to be possible. 

A malware campaign designed to siphon sensitive information from a computer is incredibly sophisticated, as it extends its reach by installing secondary plugins, secures its communication with mutual TLS (mTLS), and even installs additional remote access utilities once inside a computer, highlighting the campaign's calculated design and danger of adaptability once it enters the system. 

As FortiGuard Labs identified the threat, it is believed that the campaign distinguishes itself by its layered approach to advanced evasion techniques that can make it very difficult for it to be detected. It is noteworthy that the code is written in a language called Easy Programming Language (EPL) — a simplified Chinese based programming language that is rarely used in cyberattacks — allowing attackers to conceal the malicious activity by staging the payload in multiple steps. 

With MostereRAT, a command-and-control system can be installed on an enterprise network, and it demonstrates that when deployed, it can disable security tools, block antivirus traffic, and establish encrypted communications with the C2 infrastructure, all of which are accomplished through mutual TLS (mTLS). Infection chains are initiated by phishing emails that are crafted to appear legitimate business inquiries, with a particular emphasis on Japanese users. 

In these messages, unsuspecting recipients are directed to download a Microsoft Word file that contains a hidden ZIP archive, which in turn executes a hidden payload in the form of a hidden file. Decrypting the executable's components, installing them in the system directory, and setting up persistence mechanisms, some of which operate at SYSTEM-level privileges, so that control can be maximized. 

Moreover, the malware displays a deceptive message in Simplified Chinese claiming that the file is incompatible in order to further disguise its presence. This tactic serves as a means of deflecting suspicion while encouraging recipients to try to access the file in a more secure manner. As well as these findings, researchers noted that the attack flows and associated C2 domains have been traced to infrastructure first reported by a security researcher in 2020, as part of a banking trojan. 

However, as the threat has evolved, it has evolved into a fully-fledged remote access program called MostereRAT. 

Yurren Wan, the researcher at FortiGuard Labs, emphasized that the campaign was of a high severity, primarily because it integrated multiple advanced techniques in order to allow adversaries to stay undetected while in control of compromised systems, while maintaining complete control of the system at the same time. 

Using legitimate remote access tools to disguise their activity, attackers are able to operate in plain sight by enabling security defenses and disguising activity. It was noted by Wan that one of the most distinctive aspects of this campaign is its use of unconventional methods. For example, it is coded in Easy Programming Language (EPL), intercepts and blocks antivirus traffic at the network level, and can even escalate privileges to the level of Trusted Installer—capabilities that are rarely found in standard malware attacks. 

A MostereRAT exploit can be used to record keystrokes, exfiltrate sensitive data, create hidden administrator accounts, and make use of tools such as AnyDesk and TightVNC in order to maintain persistence over the long term over a target system once it becomes active. According to Wan, defense against such intrusions requires a layered approach that combines advanced technical safeguards with sustained user awareness. 

Additionally, he said that companies should ensure that their FortiGate, FortiClient, and FortiMail deployments are protected by the latest FortiGuard security patches, while channel partners can do the same by providing guidance to customers on how to implement a managed detection and response strategy (MDR) as well as encouraging them to take advantage of training courses such as the free Fortinet Certified Fundamentals (FCF) course in order to strengthen defenses further. 

At Deepwatch, Lauren Rucker, senior cyber threat intelligence analyst, emphasized that browser security is a crucial line of defense against phishing emails that are at the heart of the campaign. In the meantime, the risk of escalation to SYSTEM or TrustedInstaller can be reduced significantly if automatic downloads are restricted and user privilege controls are tightened. As soon as MostereRAT has been installed, it utilizes multiple techniques to undermine computer security. 

As a result of mostereRAT, Microsoft Updates have been disabled, antivirus processes have been terminated, and security software cannot communicate with their servers. By impersonating the highly privileged TrustedInstaller account, the malware escalates privileges, allowing attackers to take over the system almost completely. 

James Maude, the acting chief technology officer at BeyondTrust, explained that the campaign relies on exploiting overprivileged users and endpoints that don't have strong application control as a result of combining obscure scripting languages with trusted remote access tools. 

ManyereRAT is known for maintaining extensive lists of targeted security products, such as 360 Safe, Kingsoft Antivirus, Tencent PC Manager, Windows Defender, ESET, Avira, Avast, and Malwarebytes, among others. This application utilizes Windows Filtering Platform (WFP) filters in order to block network traffic from these tools, effectively preventing them from reaching their vendors' servers to send detection alerts or telemetry. 

In addition, researchers found that another of the malware's core modules, elsedll.db, enabled robust remote access to remote computers by utilizing mutual TLS (mTLS) authentication, and supported 37 distinct commands ranging from file manipulation and payload delivery to screen capture and user identification. It is very concerning that the malware is deliberately installing and configuring legitimate software tools like AnyDesk, TightVNC, and RDP Wrapper to create hidden backdoors for long-term usage. 

To maintain exclusive control over these utilities, attackers stealthily modify the registry, conceal themselves as much as possible, and remain invisible to system users. The experts warn that the campaign represents an important evolution in remote access trojans in that it combined advanced evasion techniques with social engineering as well as legitimate tool abuse to achieve persistent compromise, highlighting the importance of maintaining a high level of security, enforcing strict endpoint controls, and providing ongoing user awareness training in order to avoid persistent compromise. 

There has been a significant evolution in cybercriminal operations, with many campaigns combining technical innovation with thoughtful planning, since the discovery of MostereRAT underscores the fact that cybercriminals have stepped beyond rudimentary malware to create sophisticated campaigns. As a company, the real challenge will be to not only deploy updated security products, but also adopt a layered, forward-looking defense strategy that anticipates such threats before they become a problem. 

A number of measures, such as tightening user privilege policies, improving browser security, as well as increasing endpoint visibility, can help minimize exposure, however, regular awareness programs remain crucial in order to reduce the success rate of phishing lures and prevent them from achieving maximum success. 

Furthermore, by partnering with managed security providers, organizations can gain access to expertise in detection, response, and continuous monitoring that are difficult to maintain in-house by most organizations. It is clear that adversaries will continue to exploit overlooked vulnerabilities and legitimate tools to their advantage in the future, which is why threats like MostereRAT are on the rise. 

In this environment, resilient defenses and cyber capabilities require more than reactive fixes; they require a culture of preparedness, disciplining operational practices, and a commitment to stay one step ahead within the context of a threat landscape that continues to grow rapidly.

SVG Phishing Campaign Bypasses Antivirus, Targets Colombian Judiciary

 

VirusTotal has uncovered a sophisticated phishing campaign that leverages SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) files to bypass traditional antivirus detection while impersonating Colombia's judicial system. The campaign was discovered after VirusTotal added SVG support to its AI Code Insight platform, which uses machine learning to analyze suspicious behavior in uploaded files. 

Campaign discovery and scale 

The malicious SVG files initially showed zero detections by conventional antivirus scans but were flagged by VirusTotal's AI-powered Code Insight feature for suspicious JavaScript execution and HTML rendering capabilities. Following the initial discovery, VirusTotal identified 523 previously uploaded SVG files that were part of the same campaign, all of which had evaded detection by traditional security software. 

Modus operandi 

The SVG files exploit the element to display HTML content and execute JavaScript when loaded. These files create convincing fake portals impersonating Colombia's Fiscalía General de la Nación (Office of the Attorney General), complete with case numbers, security tokens, and official government branding to build victim trust. 

When users interact with these fake portals, they see a phony download progress bar that simulates an official government document download process. While victims believe they are downloading legitimate legal documents, the malware simultaneously triggers the download of a password-protected ZIP archive in the background . 

Malware payload

Analysis of the extracted ZIP files reveals a multi-component attack containing four files: a legitimate Comodo Dragon web browser executable renamed to appear as an official judicial document, a malicious DLL, and two encrypted files. When the user opens the executable, the malicious DLL is sideloaded to install additional malware on the system. 

Evasion techniques

The campaign demonstrates sophisticated evasion tactics including obfuscation, polymorphism, and substantial amounts of dummy code designed to increase file entropy and avoid static detection methods. The attackers evolved their payloads over time, with earlier samples being larger (around 25 MB) and later versions becoming more streamlined. 

Detection challenges

SVG files present unique security challenges because they can contain executable JavaScript while appearing as harmless image files to users and many security tools. Traditional antivirus solutions struggle to analyze the XML-based SVG format effectively, making AI-powered behavioral analysis crucial for detection. 

The campaign highlights the growing trend of threat actors exploiting SVG files for phishing attacks, as these files can embed malicious scripts that execute automatically while maintaining the appearance of legitimate graphics. VirusTotal's AI Code Insight platform proved essential in exposing this campaign, demonstrating how machine learning can identify threats that traditional signature-based detection methods miss .

VoidProxy Phishing Platform Emerges as Threat Capable of Bypassing MFA


 

Researchers in the field of cybersecurity are warning that a sophisticated phishing-as-a-service (PhaaS) platform known as VoidProxy is being used by criminal groups for the purpose of evading widespread security controls and is demonstrating just how far this technology has advanced in criminal groups' ability to circumvent widely deployed security controls. 

In the form of a specialised tool developed by cybercriminals to target high-value accounts neutralising the defences of multi-factor authentication (MFA), VoidProxy is specifically designed and marketed for cybercriminals. There is no question that VoidProxy, developed by researchers at Okta, the identity and access management company, is different from any other phishing kit out there. 

Rather than relying on advanced infrastructures and evasion techniques, it combines these attributes with commoditised accessibility to make it both effective and dangerous even for relatively low-skilled attackers. In particular, VoidProxy makes a great deal of sense because it relies heavily on adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing, a method of intercepting authentication flows in real time, which makes it particularly alarming. 

Using this method, cybercriminals are not only able to capture credentials, but they can also take possession of multi-factor authentication codes and session tokens generated during legitimate sign-in transactions. By bypassing these common authentication methods, VoidProxy can bypass the security measures offered by SMS-based codes and one-time passwords from authenticator apps, which are typically relied upon by organisations and individuals as a last resort. 

When it comes to VoidProxy's infrastructure, it demonstrates a combination of sophistication and cost-effectiveness that is second to none. This phishing site is hosted by its operators using low-cost top-level domains like .icu, .sbs, .cfd, .xyz, .top, and .home, making it easy to use and easily trackable. It is also important to note that the phishing content, delivered through Cloudflare's reverse proxy services, further obscures the phishing site's actual infrastructure. 

It is a layering of concealment that ensures researchers and defenders cannot determine the true IP address. The combination of this layering of concealment, in combination with its highly deceptive email campaigns, makes VoidProxy one of the most troubling emergences in the phishing service industry. In spite of the fact that the operation has never been reported until now, it demonstrates a level of maturity that is not often found in other phishing kits. 

Researchers at OKTA found that VoidProxy is capable of scaling attacks against large groups of victims, targeting enterprise users, who represent an invaluable entry point for fraud and data theft. In order to intercept authentication traffic, the service inserts itself between the victim and the authenticating service, thereby intercepting authentication traffic. As soon as credentials and multi-factor authentication data are captured, attackers can gain persistent access to a victim’s account, bypassing any protections that would otherwise make it difficult for them to access their account. 

It was only after Okta’s FastPass technology, a passwordless authentication service, identified and blocked a suspicious sign-in attempt via VoidProxy’s proxy network that a discovery of this kind was made. Researchers were able to unravel a much larger ecosystem of campaigns as a result of that single discovery, revealing a set of administrative panels and dashboards that cybercriminals were renting access to the service through the use of this service.

In recent days, the senior vice president of threat intelligence at Okta, Brett Winterford, described VoidProxy as “an example of phishing infrastructure that has been observed in recent years.” Both its ability to bypass the multi-factor authentication and its elaborate anti-analysis mechanisms have been criticised by Winterford. 

The VoidProxy phishing kit offers many layers of obfuscation, which differs from traditional phishing kits that can often be dismantled by tracking servers and blocking malicious domains. Phishing lures are sent through compromised email accounts, multiple redirect chains that make analysis a challenge, Cloudflare CAPTCHA, Workers that inspect and filter incoming traffic, and dynamic DNS that ensures the infrastructure is fast-moving. 

Using these techniques, the operation remained a secret until Okta discovered the operation, but the sophistication of the kit extended far beyond its technical defences. There are many ways attackers can distribute VoidProxy campaigns. The first is by sending phishing emails from compromised accounts linked to legitimate marketing and communication systems, such as Constant Contact, Active Campaign, and Notify Visitors, that are connected to VoidProxy campaigns. 

It is based on the reputation of established service providers that these lures will have a higher probability of escaping spam filters, allowing them to reach the inboxes of targeted users as soon as they click through, providing credentials. VoidProxy's response depends on what authentication the victim has configured.

Users who authenticate through single sign-on (SSO) are forwarded to phishing websites that are designed to harvest additional information from users, while non-federated users are directed directly to legitimate Microsoft and Google servers, while the phishing sites are designed to harvest additional information from users. In the end, affiliates deployed VoidProxy to harvest cookies through the AiTM proxy, which is hosted on an ephemeral infrastructure supported by dynamic DNS, thereby completing the final stage of the attack. 

By hijacking authenticated sessions through session cookies, attackers are able to gain access to the same level of functionality as legitimate users without the need to submit credentials repeatedly. Therefore, attackers can operate undetected until security teams detect unusual behaviour, resulting in the attacker inheriting trusted access. 

In addition to its accessibility, VoidProxy offers an administrative panel that enables paying affiliates to monitor the progress of their campaigns, as well as victim data. Due to the ease with which advanced phishing campaigns are conducted, a broader set of actors—from organised cybercrime groups to less sophisticated attackers- can engage in them as they become more familiar with the technology. 

Despite the fact that VoidProxy is a new and dangerous entrant into the phishing landscape, researchers emphasise the fact that not all defences against it are ineffective. Authenticators which are phishing-resistant, such as hardware security keys, passkeys, and smart cards, are proven to be able to block attackers from hijacking credentials or signing in through proxy infrastructure by preventing the attack. 

As a result of the research conducted by OKTA, it has been demonstrated that users equipped with these advanced authentication systems are less likely to be hacked or to be compromised via VoidProxy, but most organisations continue to rely on weaker methods of multi-factor authentication, such as SMS codes, which leaves them vulnerable to data interception. 

It has been Okta's intention to inform Google and Microsoft of VoidProxy's operations, to share intelligence with its SaaS partners, as well as to issue a customer advisory in response to the discovery. In addition to adopting phishing-resistant authentication, the company recommended that enterprises also take a broad set of security measures. 

There are several ways to do this, including limiting access to devices and networks based on trust, monitoring sign-in behaviour for anomalies, and providing users with streamlined mechanisms for reporting suspicious emails or log-in attempts. Additionally, it is crucial to cultivate a culture of cybersecurity awareness at the company. 

Employees should be trained on how to recognise phishing emails, suspicious login prompts, and common social engineering techniques, which can often lead to compromise in the organisation. Additionally, VoidProxy's rise also demonstrates a wider industry problem that the industry faces today: the proliferation of platform-based PHaaS that commoditises advanced attack techniques into a commodity. 

Other kits, such as EvilProxy, which was first reported in 2022, and Salty2FA, which was discovered earlier this year, have also demonstrated similar capabilities to bypass multi-factor authentication and hijack sessions in the past few years. In each successive platform, the stakes are raised for defenders, as techniques that were once reserved for highly skilled adversaries have become widely accessible to anyone willing to pay for access, which has raised the stakes for defenders. 

By lowering the technical barrier, these services are increasing the pool of attackers, resulting in an increase in phishing campaigns that are more effective than ever before, harder to detect, and more persistent in nature, and have a greater impact. With the emergence of VoidProxy, a critical change has been wrought in the cyber threat landscape that calls for a new approach to enterprise security. 

Legacy defences that depend solely on passwords or basic multiple-factor authentication methods will not suffice in the face of such adaptive adversaries. As a result of these threats, organisations need to create layers of security strategies, which are combined with proactive resilience, in order to protect themselves. 

Authenticators that can resist phishing attacks are essential for protecting the network from cyber threats, but in addition to them, businesses must be able to detect anomalies continuously, implement rapid incident response capabilities, and train their employees adequately. Collaboration across the cybersecurity ecosystem is also crucial. 

There is nothing more important than the importance of intelligence-sharing between vendors, enterprises, and researchers, as early detection of emerging threats and coordinated action can significantly reduce the damage caused by them. 

In today's rapidly evolving PhaaS platforms, enterprises have to change their approach from reactive defence to proactive adaptation, ensuring they are not just prepared to withstand today's attacks, but also prepared to anticipate tomorrow's attacks. Getting the most out of security is crucial in a digital world where trust itself has become one of the main targets. To be secure, one must be able to maintain agility and resilience.