A cybercrime network known as Scattered LAPSUS$ Hunters, or SLH, is offering financial rewards ranging from $500 to $1,000 per call to recruit women for voice phishing operations targeting corporate IT help desks.
The development was detailed in a threat intelligence brief published by Dataminr. According to the firm, recruits are provided with prepared scripts and paid upfront for participating in impersonation calls designed to trick help desk staff into granting account access. Analysts assess that specifically seeking female callers may be an intentional tactic to improve credibility and increase the likelihood of successful password or multi-factor authentication resets.
SLH is described as a high-profile cybercrime alliance associated with actors tied to LAPSUS$, Scattered Spider, and ShinyHunters. The group has previously demonstrated the ability to bypass multi-factor authentication using methods such as MFA prompt flooding and SIM swapping.
A core component of its intrusion strategy involves directly contacting help desks or call centers while posing as legitimate employees. Attackers attempt to persuade support staff to reset credentials or deploy remote monitoring and management software that enables persistent remote access. Once inside a network, Scattered Spider operators have been observed moving laterally into virtualized infrastructure, elevating privileges, and extracting sensitive enterprise information. In some incidents, the intrusion progressed to ransomware deployment.
To blend into legitimate traffic and evade detection, the actors routinely leverage trusted infrastructure and residential proxy services, including Luminati and OxyLabs. They have also used tunneling tools such as Ngrok, Teleport, and Pinggy, along with file-sharing platforms like file.io, gofile.io, mega.nz, and transfer.sh to transfer stolen data.
Earlier this month, Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, which tracks Scattered Spider under the alias Muddled Libra, described the actor as highly adept at manipulating human psychology. In one September 2025 investigation, attackers reportedly obtained privileged credentials through a help desk call, created a virtual machine, conducted Active Directory enumeration, and attempted to extract Microsoft Outlook mailbox data along with information downloaded from a Snowflake database.
Unit 42 also documented the group’s extensive targeting of Microsoft Azure environments through the Graph API to gain access to cloud resources. Tools such as ADRecon have been deployed to map directory structures and identify valuable assets.
Dataminr characterized the recruitment campaign as a calculated evolution in tactics, suggesting that the use of female voices may help bypass preconceived attacker profiles that help desk staff are trained to recognize.
Update: Shift Toward Branded Subdomain Impersonation and Mobile-Focused Phishing
In a follow-up assessment dated February 26, 2026, ReliaQuest reported observing ShinyHunters potentially transitioning to branded subdomain impersonation paired with live adversary-in-the-middle phishing and phone-guided social engineering. Observed domains followed formats resembling “organization.sso-verify.com.”
Researchers indicated that the group may be reusing previously exposed software-as-a-service records to craft convincing scenarios and identify the most effective internal targets. This method can enable rapid identity compromise and SaaS access through a single valid single sign-on session or help desk reset, without deploying custom malware.
ReliaQuest assessed that moving away from newly registered lookalike domains could help evade traditional domain-age detection controls. Simultaneously, mobile-oriented phishing lures may reduce visibility within enterprise network monitoring systems. The firm also noted signs of outsourced criminal labor to scale phone, email, and SMS outreach.
While the impersonation style resembles earlier Scattered Spider techniques, ReliaQuest attributed the recent subdomain activity primarily to ShinyHunters based on victim targeting patterns and operational behavior. The company stated it has no independently verifiable evidence confirming that the broader SLH collective is responsible for the subdomain campaign, though partial collaboration among groups remains possible. It also observed Telegram discussions indicating that the actors sometimes “unite” for specific social engineering operations, though the structure and scope of such collaboration remain unclear.
Security experts increasingly warn that help desks represent a critical weak point in modern enterprise defense. As organizations strengthen technical controls such as MFA and endpoint detection, attackers are redirecting efforts toward human intermediaries capable of overriding safeguards. Industry reporting throughout 2024 and 2025 has shown a consistent rise in vishing-led intrusions tied to cloud identity compromise.
Defensive recommendations include implementing stricter identity verification workflows, eliminating SMS-based authentication where possible, enforcing conditional access policies, and conducting post-call audits for new administrative accounts or privilege changes. Continuous monitoring of cloud logs and abnormal single sign-on activity is also considered essential.
The recruitment-driven expansion of scripted vishing operations signals an ongoing professionalization of social engineering. Rather than relying solely on technical exploits, threat actors are scaling psychologically informed tactics to accelerate high-volume, low-cost account compromise across enterprise environments.
Salesforce has confirmed it will not pay a ransom to an extortion group that claims to have stolen close to one billion records belonging to several of its customers. The company stated that it will not enter negotiations or make payments to any threat actor, reaffirming its policy of non-engagement with cybercriminals.
Extortion Group Claims to Have Breached Dozens of Salesforce Customers
The group behind the alleged theft calls itself “Scattered LAPSUS$ Hunters”, a name that appears to blend identities from three notorious cyber-extortion collectives: Scattered Spider, LAPSUS$, and ShinyHunters. Cybersecurity firm Mandiant, owned by Google, has been tracking this activity under the identifier UNC6040, though analysts say the group’s exact origins and membership remain unconfirmed.
According to Mandiant’s June report, the campaign began in May, when attackers used voice-based social engineering, or “vishing,” to trick employees at several organizations using Salesforce’s platform. Pretending to represent technical support teams, the callers persuaded employees to connect an attacker-controlled application to their company’s Salesforce environment. Once integrated, the app provided unauthorized access to stored customer data.
Security researchers described the tactic as simple but highly effective, since it relies on human trust rather than exploiting software vulnerabilities. Several organizations unknowingly granted the attackers access, enabling them to exfiltrate vast amounts of data.
Earlier this month, the extortionists created a leak site listing approximately 40 affected Salesforce customers, including large global firms. The site claimed that 989.45 million records had been compromised and demanded that Salesforce begin ransom negotiations “or all your customers’ data will be leaked.” The attackers added that if Salesforce agreed to pay, other victim companies would not be required to do so individually.
Salesforce, however, made its position clear. In a statement to media outlets, a company spokesperson said, “Salesforce will not engage, negotiate with, or pay any extortion demand.” The company also informed customers via email that it had received credible intelligence about plans by ShinyHunters to release the stolen data publicly, but it would still not yield to any ransom demand.
Broader Concerns Over Ransomware Economics
The incident adds to a growing global debate over ransom payments. Analysts say extortion and ransomware attacks persist largely because organizations continue to pay. According to Deepstrike Security, global ransom payments in 2024 reached $813 million, a decline from $1.1 billion in 2023 but still a major incentive for criminal groups.
Experts such as independent security researcher Kevin Beaumont have repeatedly criticized the practice of paying ransoms, arguing that it directly funds organized crime and perpetuates the cycle of attacks. Beaumont noted that while law enforcement agencies like the UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA) publicly discourage payments, some companies still proceed with negotiations, sometimes even with NCA representatives present.
Risks and Lessons for Organizations
Data stolen from cloud-based platforms like Salesforce may include customer identifiers, contact details, transaction histories, and other business records. Even without financial information, such data can be weaponized in phishing, identity theft, or fraud campaigns.
Security professionals advise all organizations using cloud platforms to implement multi-factor authentication, enforce least-privilege access controls, and review all third-party applications connected to their systems. Employees should be trained to verify unexpected support calls or administrative requests through official channels before granting access.
The Salesforce case underscores the growing sophistication of social engineering attacks targeting major enterprise platforms. As digital ecosystems expand, cybercriminals are increasingly exploiting human error rather than software flaws. Salesforce’s refusal to pay marks a firm stance in an era when ransom-driven extortion continues to dominate the threat landscape, sending a strong message to both the cybersecurity community and the attackers themselves.
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company has confirmed that customer information was exposed during a cyber incident that occurred in June. The company shared the update through a recent filing with California’s Attorney General, marking the latest in a growing number of attacks targeting the insurance sector.
The breach was traced back to a period between June 9 and June 10, when an unauthorized individual gained access to parts of the company’s systems. Although the incident was initially referred to as a network outage, a closer look revealed that certain personal details belonging to customers had been accessed and stolen.
According to the company’s investigation, which concluded about a month later on July 9, the compromised information included customers’ full names, birth dates, and driver’s license numbers. So far, the company has not revealed how many individuals were affected or who might be responsible for the breach.
Philadelphia Indemnity stated that no ransomware was used, and no files were encrypted during the incident. However, to better understand what happened and assess the damage, the company hired independent cybersecurity experts and reported the situation to law enforcement.
This breach comes at a time when cyberattacks targeting insurance companies appear to be on the rise. Security researchers have recently linked several similar incidents to a known hacking group called "Scattered Spider," although Philadelphia Indemnity has not confirmed any connection to that group in this case.
Other companies in the industry, including Aflac and Erie Insurance, also reported data breaches in June, suggesting a broader trend of insurance providers being targeted.
As of now, Philadelphia Indemnity has not issued a public statement beyond the regulatory filing and did not respond to requests for further comment.
The incident is a wake up call regarding the growing risks in the digital ecosystem and the importance of strong cybersecurity, especially for organizations that manage sensitive personal data. Customers are advised to monitor their accounts for unusual activity and consider taking precautionary steps like credit monitoring or identity theft protection.