Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Showing posts with label Meta. Show all posts

Technical Glitch Causes Global Disruption for Meta Users

 


In a recent setback for Meta users, a widespread service outage occurred on March 5th, affecting hundreds of thousands worldwide. Meta's spokesperson, Andy Stone, attributed the disruption to a "technical issue," apologising for any inconvenience caused.

Shortly after the incident, multiple hacktivist groups, including Skynet, Godzilla, and Anonymous Sudan, claimed responsibility. However, cybersecurity firm Cyberint revealed that the disruption might have been a result of a cyberattack, as abnormal traffic patterns indicative of a DDoS attack were detected.

The outage left Facebook and Instagram users unable to access the platforms, with many being inexplicably logged out. Some users, despite entering correct credentials, received "incorrect password" messages, raising concerns about a potential hacking event. Both desktop and mobile users, totaling over 550,000 on Facebook and 90,000 on Instagram globally, were impacted.

This isn't the first time Meta (formerly Facebook) faced such issues. In late 2021, a six-hour outage occurred when the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routes were withdrawn, effectively making Facebook servers inaccessible. The BGP functions like a railroad switchman, directing data packets' paths, and the absence of these routes caused a communication breakdown.

As the outage unfolded, users found themselves abruptly logged out of the platform, exacerbating the inconvenience. The disruption's ripple effect triggered concerns among users, with fears of a potential cyberattack amplifying the chaos.

It's worth noting that hacktivist groups often claim responsibility for disruptions they may not have caused, aiming to boost their perceived significance and capabilities. In this case, the true source of the disruption remains under investigation, and Meta continues to work on strengthening its systems against potential cyber threats.

In the contemporary sphere of technology, where service interruptions have become more prevalent, it is vital for online platforms to educate themselves on cybersecurity measures. Users are urged to exercise vigilance and adhere to best practices in online security, thus effectively mitigating the repercussions of such incidents.

This incident serves as a reminder of the interconnected nature of online platforms and the potential vulnerabilities that arise from technical glitches or malicious activities. Meta assures users that they are addressing the issue promptly and implementing measures to prevent future disruptions.

As the digital world persists in evolution, users and platforms alike must adapt to the dynamic landscape, emphasising the importance of cybersecurity awareness and resilient systems to ensure a secure online experience for all.




Signal Protocol Links WhatsApp, Messenger in DMA-Compliant Fusion

 


As part of the launch of the new EU regulations governing the use of digital "gatekeepers," Meta is ready to answer all of your questions about WhatsApp and Messenger providing end-to-end encryption (E2EE), while also complying with the requirements outlined in the Digital Markets Act (DMA). A blog post by Meta on Wednesday detailed how it plans to enable interoperability with Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp in the EU, which means users can message each other if they also use Signal's underlying encryption protocol when communicating with third-party messaging platforms. 

As the Digital Markets Act of Europe becomes more and more enforced, big tech companies are getting ready to comply with it. In response to the new competition rules that took effect on March 6, Google, Meta, and other companies have begun making plans to comply and what will happen to end users. 

There is no doubt that the change was not entirely the result of WhatsApp's decision. It is known that European lawmakers have designated WhatsApp parent company Meta as one of the six influential "gatekeeper" companies under their sweeping Digital Markets Act, giving it six months to allow others to enter its walled garden. 

Even though it's just a few weeks until the deadline for WhatsApp interoperability with other apps approaches, the company is describing its plans. As part of the first year of the regulation, the requirements were designed to support one-to-one chats and file sharing like images, videos, or voice messages, with plans for these requirements to be expanded in the coming years to include group chats and calls as well. 

In December, Meta decided to stop allowing Instagram to communicate with Messenger, presumably to implement a DMA strategy. In addition to Apple's iMessage app and Microsoft's Edge web browser, the EU has also made clear that the four parent companies of Facebook, Google, and TikTok are "gatekeepers," although Apple's parent company Alphabet and TikTok's parent company ByteDance are excluded. 

ETA stated that before the company can work with third-party providers to implement the service, they need to sign an agreement for interoperability between Messenger and WhatsApp. To ensure that other providers use the same security standards as WhatsApp, the company requires them to use the Signal protocol. 

However, if they can be found to meet these standards, they will accept others. As soon as another service sends a request for interoperability, Meta is given a window of three months in which to do so. The organization warns, however, that functionality may not be available for the general public to access immediately. 

The approach Meta has taken to interoperability is designed to meet the DMA requirements while also providing a feasible option for third-party providers looking to maximize security and privacy for their customers. For privacy and security, Meta will use the Signal Protocol to ensure end-to-end encrypted communication. This protocol is currently widely considered the gold standard for end-to-end encryption in E2EE.

Meta’s Facebook, Instagram Back Online After Two Hour Long Outage

 

On March 5, a technical failure resulted in widespread login issues across Meta's Facebook, Instagram, Threads, and Messenger platforms.

Meta's head of communications, Andy Stone, confirmed the issues on X, formerly known as Twitter, and stated that the company "resolved the issue as quickly as possible for everyone who was impacted, and we apologise for any inconvenience." 

Users reported getting locked out of their Facebook accounts, and the platform's feeds, as well as Threads and Instagram, did not refresh. WhatsApp, which is also owned by Meta, seems unaffected.

A senior official from the United States Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency told reporters Tuesday that the agency was "not cognizant of any specific election nexus nor any specific malicious cyber activity nexus to the outage.” 

The outage occurs just ahead of the March 7th deadline for Big Tech firms to comply with the European Union's new Digital Markets Act. To comply, Meta is making modifications, including allowing users to separate their Facebook and Instagram accounts, and preventing personal information from being pooled to target them with online adverts. It is unclear whether the downtime is related to Meta's preparations for the DMA. 

Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp went down for hours in 2021, which the firm blamed on inaccurate changes to routers that coordinate network traffic between its data centres. The following year, WhatsApp experienced another brief outage. 

Facebook engineers were dispatched to one of its key US data centres in California to restore service, indicating that the fix had to be done remotely. Further complicating matters, the outage briefly prevented some employees from using their badges to access workplaces and conference rooms, according to The New York Times, which initially reported that engineers had been called to the data centre.

Meta's AI Ambitions Raised Privacy and Toxicity Concerns

In a groundbreaking announcement following Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg's latest earnings report, concerns have been raised over the company's intention to utilize vast troves of user data from Facebook and Instagram to train its own AI systems, potentially creating a competing chatbot. 

Zuckerberg's revelation that Meta possesses more user data than what was employed in training ChatGPT has sparked widespread apprehension regarding privacy and toxicity issues. The decision to harness personal data from Facebook and Instagram posts and comments for the development of a rival chatbot has drawn scrutiny from both privacy advocates and industry observers. 

This move, unveiled by Zuckerberg, has intensified anxieties surrounding the handling of sensitive user information within Meta's ecosystem. As reported by Bloomberg, the disclosure of Meta's strategic shift towards leveraging its extensive user data for AI development has set off a wave of concerns regarding the implications for user privacy and the potential amplification of toxic behaviour within online interactions. 

Additionally, the makers will potentially offer it free of charge to the public which led to different concerns in the tech community. While the prospect of accessible AI technology may seem promising, critics argue that Zuckerberg's ambitious plans lack adequate consideration for the potential consequences and ethical implications. 

Following the new development, Mark Zuckerberg reported to the public that he sees Facebook's continued user growth as an opportunity to leverage data from Facebook and Instagram to develop powerful, general-purpose artificial intelligence. With hundreds of billions of publicly shared images and tens of billions of public videos on these platforms, along with a significant volume of public text posts, Zuckerberg believes this data can provide unique insights and feedback loops to advance AI technology. 

Furthermore, as per Zuckerberg, Meta has access to an even larger dataset than Common Crawl, comprised of user-generated content from Facebook and Instagram, which could potentially enable the development of a more sophisticated chatbot. This advantage extends beyond sheer volume; the interactive nature of the data, particularly from comment threads, is invaluable for training conversational AI agents. This strategy mirrors OpenAI's approach of mining dialogue-rich platforms like Reddit to enhance the capabilities of its chatbot. 

What is Threatening? 

Meta's plan to train its AI on personal posts and conversations from Facebook comments raises significant privacy concerns. Additionally, the internet is rife with toxic content, including personal attacks, insults, racism, and sexism, which poses a challenge for any chatbot training system. Apple, known for its cautious approach, has faced delays in its Siri relaunch due to these issues. However, Meta's situation may be particularly problematic given the nature of its data sources. 

Mark Zuckerberg Apologizes to Families in Fiery US Senate Hearing

Mark Zuckerberg Apologizes to Families in Fiery US Senate Hearing

In a recent US Senate hearing, Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta (formerly Facebook), faced intense scrutiny over the impact of social media platforms on children. Families who claimed their children had been harmed by online content were present, and emotions ran high throughout the proceedings.

The Apology and Its Context

Zuckerberg's apology came after families shared heartbreaking stories of self-harm and suicide related to social media content. The hearing focused on protecting children online, and it provided a rare opportunity for US senators to question tech executives directly. Other CEOs, including those from TikTok, Snap, X (formerly Twitter), and Discord, were also in the hot seat.

The central theme was clear: How can we ensure the safety and well-being of young users in the digital age? The families' pain and frustration underscored the urgency of this question.

The Instagram Prompt and Child Sexual Abuse Material

One important topic during the hearing was an Instagram prompt related to child sexual abuse material. Zuckerberg acknowledged that the prompt was a mistake and expressed regret. The prompt mistakenly directed users to search for explicit content when they typed certain keywords. This incident raised concerns about the effectiveness of content moderation algorithms and the need for continuous improvement.

Zuckerberg defended the importance of free expression but also recognized the responsibility that comes with it. He emphasized the need to strike a balance between allowing diverse viewpoints and preventing harm. The challenge lies in identifying harmful content without stifling legitimate discourse.

Directing Users Toward Helpful Resources

During his testimony, Zuckerberg highlighted efforts to guide users toward helpful resources. When someone searches for self-harm-related content, Instagram now directs them to resources that promote mental health and well-being. While imperfect, this approach reflects a commitment to mitigating harm.

The Role of Parents and Educators

Zuckerberg encouraged parents to engage with their children about online safety and set boundaries. He acknowledged that technology companies cannot solve these issues alone; collaboration with schools and communities is essential.

Mark Zuckerberg's apology was a significant moment, but it cannot be the end. Protecting children online requires collective action from tech companies, policymakers, parents, and educators. We must continue to address the challenges posed by social media while fostering a healthy digital environment for the next generation.

As the hearing concluded, the families' pain remained palpable. Their stories serve as a stark reminder that behind every statistic and algorithm lies a real person—a child seeking connection, validation, and safety. 

Privacy at Stake: Meta's AI-Enabled Ray-Ban Garners' Mixed Reactions

 



There is a high chance that Meta is launching a new version of Ray-Ban glasses with embedded artificial intelligence assistant capabilities to revolutionize wearable technology. As a result of this innovation, users will have the ability to process audio and video cues to produce textual or audible responses in response to their actions. 

Among the top features of these glasses is the “Look and Ask” feature, which is a feature that lets the wearer snap a picture and inquire about it instantly, thereby reducing the amount of time it takes to translate languages and improving the interaction between the user and the environment. 

For its upcoming AI-integrated smart glasses, Meta has announced that they are launching an early access program, which enables users to take advantage of a host of new features and privacy concerns. In addition to Meta AI, the company's proprietary multimodal AI assistant, Meta AI will be available as part of the second generation of Meta Ray-Bans. 

It is possible to control features and get information about what you are seeing in real-time using the wake phrase “Hey Meta.” In doing so, however, the company gathers an extensive amount of personal information about you, and it leaves room for interpretation as to how this data is used. 

Currently in the beta phase, the glasses come with an artificial intelligence assistant that can process video and audio prompts, and provide a text or audio output to users. The company plans to launch an early access trial program shortly. In his Instagram reel, Zuckerberg demonstrated that the glasses could be used to suggest clothes and translate text, illustrating how useful they can be daily. 

It is important to note, however, that privacy advocates are raising concerns about the potential risks resulting from such advanced technology, since all images taken by the glasses are stored by Meta, ostensibly to train the artificial intelligence systems that operate the glasses. 

There are significant concerns raised about the extent and use of data collected by Meta, building on ongoing concerns regarding Meta's privacy policies. Although Meta cites that while it collects 'essential' data for maintaining the functionality of the device, such as battery life and connectivity, users are free to provide additional data for developing new features. 

The company's privacy policy, however, still has a lot of ambiguity around the types of data it collects to identify policy violations and misuses. The first model of Meta included safety features such as a visible camera light and a switch for recording, but despite these features, sales and engagement were lower than expected. 

In addition to advancing the field of AI, Meta's new enhancements aim to rebuild public trust amidst privacy concerns while also aiming to achieve a technological breakthrough. It has been announced that Meta's latest Ray-Ban spectacles will include a built-in AI assistant offering innovative features, such as real-time photo queries and language translation, despite controversy surrounding privacy practices. 

Despite the advancements in wearable technology, trust remains one of wearable technology's biggest challenges. As part of the first version of Meta's smart glasses, several safety features had been installed, such as a flashing light that signals when the cameras are in use, an on/off switch, and others, to ensure the glasses were safe to wear.  

Although sales were not as expected, they were still a bit lower than what was predicted - down 20% from the target. The fact that only 10% of the glasses were active after 18 months since the first launch shows that Meta did not achieve what it might have liked, even though they were ultimately purchased. 

The new AI features that Meta is developing are, needless to say, desperate to change these stats. Even though privacy concerns still loom large, it remains to be seen whether the tech giant will be able to convince its users of the company's reliability when it comes to personal data.

Trading Tomorrow's Technology for Today's Privacy: The AI Conundrum in 2024

 


Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a technology that continually absorbs and transfers humanity's collective intelligence with machine learning algorithms. It is a technology that is all-pervasive, and it will soon be all-pervasive as well. It is becoming increasingly clear that, as technology advances, so does its approach to data management the lack thereof. Thus, as the start of 2024 approaches, certain developments will have long-lasting impacts. 

Taking advantage of Google's recent integration of Bard, its chat-based AI tool, into a host of other Google apps and services is a good example of how generative AI is being moved more directly into consumer life through the use of text, images, and voice. 

A super-charged version of Google Assistant, Bard is equipped with everything from Gmail, Docs, and Drive, to Google Maps, YouTube, Google Flights, and hotels, all of which are bundled with it. Using a conversational, natural-language mode, Bard can filter enormous amounts of data online, while providing personalized responses to individual users, all while doing so in an unprecedented way. 

Creating shopping lists, summarizing emails, booking trips — all things that a personal assistant would do — for those without one. As of 2023, we have seen many examples of how not everything one sees or hears on the internet is real, whether it be politics, movies, or even wars. 

Artificial intelligence technology continues to advance rapidly, and the advent of deep fakes has raised concern in the country about its potential to influence electoral politics, especially during the Lok Sabha elections that are planned to take place next year. 

There is a sharp rise in deep fakes that have caused widespread concern in the country. In a deepfake, artificial intelligence can be used to create videos or audio that make sense of the actions or statements of people they did not do or say, resulting in the spread of misinformation and damage to their reputation. 

In the wake of the massive leap in public consciousness about the importance of generative AI that occurred in 2023, individuals and businesses will be putting artificial intelligence at the centre of even more decisions in the coming year. 

Artificial intelligence is no longer a new concept. In 2023, ChatGPT, MidJourney, Google Bard, corporate chatbots, and other artificial intelligence tools have taken the internet by storm. Their capabilities have been commended by many, while others have expressed concerns regarding plagiarism and the threat they pose to certain careers, including those related to content creation in the marketing industry. 

There is no denying that artificial intelligence, no matter what you think about it, has dramatically changed the privacy landscape. Despite whatever your feelings about AI are, the majority of people will agree on the fact that AI tools are trained on data that is collected from the creators and the users of them. 

For privacy reasons, it can be difficult to maintain transparency regarding how this data is handled since it can be difficult to understand how it is being handled. Additionally, users may forget that their conversations with AI are not as private as text conversations with other humans and that they may inadvertently disclose sensitive data during these conversations. 

According to the GDPR, users are already protected from fully automated decisions making a decision about the course of their lives by the GDPR -- for example, an AI cannot deny a bank loan based on how it analyzes someone's financial situation. The proposed legislation in many parts of the world will eventually lead to more law enforcement regulating artificial intelligence (AI) in 2024. 

Additionally, AI developers will likely continue to refine their tools to change them into (hopefully) more privacy-conscious oriented tools as the laws governing them become more complex. As Zamir anticipates that Bard Extensions will become even more personalized and integrated with the online shopping experience, such as auto-filling out of checkout forms, tracking shipments, and automatically comparing prices, Bard extensions are on course to become even more integrated with the online shopping experience. 

All of that entails some risk, according to him, from the possibility of unauthorized access to personal and financial information during the process of filling out automated forms, the possibility of maliciously intercepting information on real-time tracking, and even the possibility of manipulated data in price comparisons. 

During 2024, there will be a major transformation in the tapestry of artificial intelligence, a transformation that will stir a debate on privacy and security. From Google's Bard to deepfake anxieties, let's embark on this technological odyssey with vigilant minds as users ride the wave of AI integration. Do not be blind to the implications of artificial intelligence. The future of AI is to be woven by a moral compass, one that guides innovation and ensures that AI responsibly enriches lives.

Meta Rolls Out Default End-to-End Encryption on Messenger Amid Child Security Concerns

 

Meta Platforms (META.O) announced on Wednesday the commencement of the rollout of end-to-end encryption for personal chats and calls on both Messenger and Facebook. This heightened security feature, ensuring that only the sender and recipients can access messages and calls, is now immediately available. 

However, Meta acknowledges that the process of implementing default end-to-end encryption may take some time to be fully carried out across all Messenger accounts. While users previously had the option to activate end-to-end encryption for individual messages, Meta's latest update aims to establish this advanced privacy measure as the default setting for all users. This signifies a noteworthy enhancement in safeguarding user data. 

Privacy Safety Issues 

In introducing encryption, Meta emphasized that the content of messages is now inaccessible to everyone, including the company itself, unless a user opts to report a message, as mentioned by Loredana Crisan, the head of Messenger, in a post unveiling this update. To make this decision, Meta collaborated with external experts, academics, advocates, and governmental entities. Their joint efforts aimed to pinpoint potential risks, ensuring that the enhancement of privacy goes hand-in-hand with maintaining a safe online environment, as highlighted in Crisan's announcement. 

Why Law Agencies Criticizing the Move? 

Meta Platforms' move to introduce default encryption on Messenger has drawn criticism from various quarters, with notable voices such as Home Secretary James Cleverly and James Babbage, director general for threats at the National Crime Agency, expressing concerns about its potential impact on detecting child sexual abuse on the platform. 

In a disappointed tone, Home Secretary James Cleverly highlighted the significance of Meta's decision as a setback, particularly in light of collaborative efforts to address online harms. Despite this disappointment, he stressed a continued commitment to working closely with Meta to ensure the safety of children in the online space. 

James Babbage, director general for threats at the National Crime Agency, echoed this sentiment, characterizing Meta's choice to implement end-to-end encryption on Facebook Messenger as highly disappointing. He emphasized the increased challenges their team now faces in fulfilling their role of protecting children from sexual abuse and exploitation due to this development. 

Let’s Understand E2EE 

End-to-end encryption (E2EE) in messaging ensures the confidentiality of messages for all parties involved, including the messaging service. Within the framework of E2EE, a message undergoes decryption exclusively for the sender and the designated recipient, symbolizing the two "ends" of the conversation and giving rise to the term "end-to-end." 

"When E2EE is default, we will also use a variety of tools, including artificial intelligence, subject to applicable law, to proactively detect accounts engaged in malicious patterns of behaviour instead of scanning private messages," the company wrote. 

While numerous messaging services claim to provide encrypted communications, not all genuinely offer end-to-end encryption. Typically, a message undergoes encryption as it travels from the sender to the service's server and subsequently from the server to the intended recipient. Nevertheless, in certain instances, the message may be briefly decrypted when it reaches the server before undergoing re-encryption. 

The nomenclature "end-to-end" encryption is apt because it renders it practically impossible for any intermediary to decrypt the message. Users can place confidence in the fact that the messaging service lacks the technical capability to read their messages. To draw a parallel, envisage sending a letter secured in a locked box, of which solely the sender and the recipient possess the key. This physical barrier for anyone else mirrors the digital functionality of E2EE.

Meta Extends Ad-Free Facebook and Instagram Premium Access Worldwide



With the introduction of its ad-free subscription service, Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, offers European users the chance to enjoy their favourite social platforms without being bombarded with advertisements. The recent ruling of the EU's Court of Justice ordered Meta to obtain the consent of users before personalizing any ads for those users in response to a recent ruling issued by the Court of Justice of the EU. With this move, Meta is showing that it is complying with the regulatory framework that is changing in the European Union. 

According to the announcement, users in these regions will have the opportunity to choose between continuing to use the platforms for free ad-support or signing up for a free ad-free subscription experience in November. There is no possibility that the user information will be used for targeting adverts during the subscription period. 

Facebook and Instagram users in the European Union are soon going to be able to enjoy an ad-free experience but at a cost. Starting in November of this year, we will be able to opt into the new, premium service offered by Meta, which is the company’s parent company that owns the platforms. Meta is the company behind the platforms that operates the platforms and is the parent company of Meta. 

Regarding pricing, 18-and-up users will be asked to pay €9.99 per month (roughly $10.55 per month) if they want to access sites without advertisements through a web browser, and €12.99 for users who want to access websites through streamlined iOS and Android apps. Facebook users will not be shown ads on Facebook or Instagram after enrolling in the program, and their data and online activities will not be used to tailor future ads based on their browsing activity. 

Every additional account added to a user's Account Center in the future will be charged an additional fee of €6 per month for the web and €8 per month for iOS and Android devices beginning on March 1, 2024, by way of an increase of fees every month.

Historically, Meta has operated solely by offering free social networking services to its users, and by selling advertising to companies who wish to reach those users. As a result of data privacy laws and other government policies that are affecting technology companies, especially in Europe, it illustrate the fact that companies have been redesigning their products to comply with those policies. 

It is estimated that more than 450 million Europeans, across 27 countries, use Amazon, Apple, Google, TikTok and other companies to comply with new rules in the European Union. The number of people using Facebook each month is estimated to be 258 million, according to Meta's estimates. According to Meta's estimate, 257 million people use Instagram every month as well. 

For iOS and Android, it is important to note that the prices are adjusted based on the fees imposed by Apple and Google by their respective purchasing policies. The subscription will be valid until March 1, 2024, for all linked accounts within the Account Center of a user for six months. A monthly fee of €6 will, however, be charged starting March 1, 2024, for each additional account listed in a user's Account Center, starting on the web and €8 for iOS and Android. 

Meta was effectively barred from combining data collected from users across its various platforms - including Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp - as well as from outside websites and apps in July, by the European Court of Justice, the highest court in the European Union, to protect the privacy of users. The E.U. regulators issued the fine in January for forcing Meta users to accept personalized ads as a requirement of using Facebook in a condition of fines of three billion euros. That decision was issued in response to a violation of privacy regulations. This may be a solution to comply in full with the judgment provided that we offer a subscription service without displaying adverts to our subscribers in Europe, Meta said in response to the European Court of Justice's judgement of July. 

A subscription can allow users to access the platforms without being exposed to the advertising that is displayed to their subscribers. There has been no paid and ad-free subscription for services like Facebook and Instagram since Facebook and its founder Mark Zuckerberg were formed in the early days of the company. As far as they are concerned, they have always believed that they can only offer their services for free, provided that advertisements accompany them. 

However, Meta is now offering a way for Instagram and Facebook users to subscribe to both services through one simple option. Due to pressure from the European Union, the move was made after the move was put forward, and therefore, the option is only available to customers in the European Union. 

This means that Instagram users in India will remain exposed to ads no matter whether they choose them or not, and will still see them on their feeds. In any case, if Instagram subscription plans prove to be popular in the European Union and Meta sees value in them, it might be possible for similar Instagram subscription plans to be introduced to India in the future.

It does seem quite a steep subscription price - even more so if users look at the figures in Indian rupees which would be Rs 880-Rs 1150 - but given that it allows users to enjoy Instagram and Facebook in ad-free settings, it is tempting. As well as this promise, Meta also promises that users of their paid plans will not be able to use their personal information for targeted marketing purposes. 

A short time ago Mark Zuckerberg said in an interview that Facebook wants their users to have free access to their service and added ads to it so that users and the company benefit from the process. This is one of the things that has been talked about again and again by Facebook and their CEO.

There will be no change to the ad-supported experience that Facebook and Instagram currently provide to users who choose to continue using the service for free. In Meta, users will be able to control their ad preferences and the ads shown to them as well as the data used for ad targeting by using tools and settings that will enable them to influence what ads they see and what data is used.

It is important to note that advertisers will continue to be able to target users who have opted for free, ad-supported online services in Europe, so they will still be able to conduct personalised advertising campaigns. To preserve both user and business value on its platforms, Meta commits to investing in new tools that offer enhanced controls over ad experiences on its platforms, so it can preserve value for both.

Meta is actively exploring options to provide teenagers with a responsible ad experience in line with the evolving regulatory landscape so that they will be able to explore advertising in a safe environment. Users over 18 will have the option of becoming subscribers for an ad-free experience, and Meta is actively exploring options to support teenagers in this area.

WhatsApp's New Twinning Feature: Manage Two Accounts on a Single Device

 


There has been an announcement by Meta that users of smartphone devices will soon have the ability to use two WhatsApp accounts on the same device. 

According to Zuckerberg, switching between work and personal accounts is now much easier with this feature in place – now you don't have to worry about logging out individually each time, carrying two phones, or having your messages sent from the wrong account. 

The WhatsApp Business feature has been in development for a few months now, both in the beta version of WhatsApp and in the business version. Now it is finally available. In a recent press release, Meta said the new capability aimed at making switching accounts easier for users, such as switching between their personal phone numbers and their professional numbers, a feature aimed to simplify life for users. 

There are many people who prefer to maintain two WhatsApp accounts: one for work and one for personal communication. As a result, these users need to download a copying app on Android or setup a WhatsApp Business account on iOS in order to use this method. In this situation, it is important to point out that the multi-account login feature opens up.

It gives users the option to switch from one WhatsApp account to another with just a few taps. For the feature to be enabled, users will need to obtain a new phone number (with a SIM card) or a new phone with multiple SIMs installed in order to use it. Through a one-time password, a verification will be done for the second number by the app.  

There has been some discussion regarding the availability of the feature on Android, but to date, it is only available on Android devices. In the coming weeks, users are expected to receive the new update. Meta also recommends that users only use the official WhatsApp application and not download unofficial or fake versions to make it easier for them to add more accounts. 

WhatsApp assures users that their messages are secure and private, whereas imitations may not provide the same level of security for your messages. Currently, Meta's decision is to create a new feature to make it easier for users to use multiple WhatsApp accounts on different devices in the future. 

As of 2021, Meta has now expanded this feature to include other smartphones, so users will now be able to access their accounts on Android tablets, browsers, or computers using the multi-device feature. As a result, users of Meta will now be able to use their WhatsApp accounts on two different smartphones simultaneously. 

When setting up a second account, users can do so by going to Settings > Add Account. When setting up, they will need their second mobile phone with a SIM or a device that has the physical or eSIM capabilities for multi-SIM. It was announced earlier this week that each account can have its own notifications and privacy settings. 

With the passkey support that WhatsApp launched earlier this week for the Android version, users can no longer use SMS-based two-factor authentication to log into the app. The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Meta, Mark Zuckerberg, has unveiled an upcoming functionality that will enable users to utilize two WhatsApp accounts on one device, thereby streamlining the administration of personal and professional dialogues. 

This functionality, initially accessible on the Android platform, is scheduled for global implementation in the forthcoming weeks. Users will be required to possess an extra telephone number for verification purposes. Meta strongly advises against the acquisition of unofficial WhatsApp versions due to security concerns. This advancement is congruent with Meta's endeavours to augment user satisfaction and extend multi-account capabilities across diverse devices.

Lawmaker Warns: Meta Chatbots Could Influence Users by ‘Manipulative’ Advertising


Senator Ed Markey has urged Meta to postpone the launch of its new chatbots since they could lead to increased data collection and confuse young users by blurring the line between content and advertisements.

The warning letter was issued the same day Meta revealed their plans to incorporate chatbots powered by AI into their sponsored apps, i.e. WhatsApp, Messenger, and Instagram.

In the letter, Markey wrote to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg that, “These chatbots could create new privacy harms and exacerbate those already prevalent on your platforms, including invasive data collection, algorithmic discrimination, and manipulative advertisements[…]I strongly urge you to pause the release of any AI chatbots until Meta understands the effect that such products will have on young users.”

According to Markey, the algorithms have already “caused serious harms,” to customers, like “collecting and storing detailed personal information[…]facilitating housing discrimination against communities of color.”

He added that while chatbots can benefit people, they also possess certain risks. He further highlighted the risk of chatbots, noting the possibility that they could identify the difference between ads and content. 

“Young users may not realize that a chatbot’s response is actually advertising for a product or service[…]Generative AI also has the potential to adapt and target advertising to an 'audience of one,' making ads even more difficult for young users to identify,” states Markey.

Markey also noted that chatbots might also make social media platforms more “addictive” to the users (than they already are).

“By creating the appearance of chatting with a real person, chatbots may significantly expand users’ -- especially younger users’ – time on the platform, allowing the platform to collect more of their personal information and profit from advertising,” he wrote. “With chatbots threatening to supercharge these problematic practices, Big Tech companies, such as Meta, should abandon this 'move fast and break things' ethos and proceed with the utmost caution.”

The lawmaker is now asking Meta to respond to a series of questions in regards to their new chatbots, including the ones that might have an impact on users’ privacy and advertising.

Moreover, the questions include a detailed insight into the roles of chatbots when it comes to data collection and whether Meta will commit not to use any information gleaned from them to target advertisements for their young users. Markey inquired about the possibility of adverts being integrated into the chatbots and, if so, how Meta intends to prevent those ads from confusing children.

In their response, a Meta spokesperson has confirmed that the company has indeed received the said letter. 

Meta further notes in a blog post that it is working in collaboration with the government and other entities “to establish responsible guardrails,” and is training the chatbots with consideration to safety. For instance, Meta writes, the tools “will suggest local suicide and eating disorder organizations in response to certain queries, while making it clear that it cannot provide medical advice.”  

Privacy Class Action Targets OpenAI and Microsoft

A new consumer privacy class action lawsuit has targeted OpenAI and Microsoft, which is a significant step. This legal action is a response to alleged privacy violations in how they handled user data, and it could be a turning point in the continuing debate over internet companies and consumer privacy rights.

The complaint, which was submitted on September 6, 2023, claims that OpenAI and Microsoft both failed to protect user information effectively, infringing on the rights of consumers to privacy. According to the plaintiffs, the corporations' policies for gathering, storing, and exchanging data did not adhere to current privacy laws.

According to the plaintiffs, OpenAI and Microsoft were accused of amassing vast quantities of personal data without explicit user consent, potentially exposing sensitive information to unauthorized third parties. The complaint also raises concerns about the transparency of these companies' data-handling policies.

This lawsuit follows a string of high-profile privacy-related incidents in the tech industry, emphasizing the growing importance of protecting user data. Critics argue that as technology continues to play an increasingly integral role in daily life, companies must take more proactive measures to ensure the privacy and security of their users.

The case against OpenAI and Microsoft echoes similar legal battles involving other tech giants, including Meta (formerly Facebook), further underscoring the need for comprehensive privacy reform. Sarah Silverman, a prominent figure in the entertainment industry, recently filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, highlighting the potentially far-reaching implications of this case.

The outcome of this lawsuit could potentially set a precedent for future legal action against companies that fall short of safeguarding consumer privacy. It may also prompt a broader conversation about the role of regulatory bodies in enforcing stricter privacy standards within the tech industry.

As the legal proceedings unfold, all eyes will be on the courts to see how this case against OpenAI and Microsoft will shape the future of consumer privacy rights in the United States and potentially serve as a catalyst for more robust data protection measures across the industry.

MasterClass: Online Learning Platform Accused of Violating Customer Privacy by Sharing Info to Meta


Online learning platform MasterClass has been charged for using trackers, transmitting certain customer data to Meta for advertisement purposes without users’ consent.

In regards to the case, the law firm Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, PLLC has been gathering the MasterClass victims, to take action against the Yanka Industries, owner of the online education platform. 

According to Milberg, their firm has “reasons to believe” that MasterClass has been using tracking tool that are “secretly transmit details about certain users and the videos they’ve watched to Facebook” for advertising purposes. They further noted that this data may link a MasterClass subscriber’s watch history to their Facebook accounts. 

“Many website operators gather data about the people who visit their websites by using an invisible tracking tool called the Meta (formerly known as Facebook) pixel. The pixel, which can be embedded on any webpage, can be programmed to record every action a visitor takes, such as the buttons they click, the searches they perform and the content they view,” explains Milberg.

The law firm further notes that the data collected via the tracking tools can be used by the website operator (in this case, Yanka Industries), to better target advertising to potential consumers.

“In the case of MasterClass.com, attorneys are specifically looking into whether the website is tracking which videos its users have watched and sending that information to Meta along with each person’s Facebook ID. A Facebook ID is a unique identifier linked to an individual’s Facebook profile and could potentially be used to match up a specific person with the videos they’ve watched on Yanka Industries’ website,” the firm stated.

If the accusations turn out to be true, MasterClass’ actions will then be a violation of the federal Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA).

At present, Milberg is not filing a lawsuit against MasterClass, but is pursuing mass arbitration instead. This is a relatively new legal strategy, according to the law firm, that is comparable to a class action lawsuit and enables a group of people to demand restitution from a company for alleged wrongdoing.

According to Milberg, if it is proven true that MasterClass violated the VPPA, the corporation would be liable for compensating each customer $2,500. However, there was no specific proof offered by Milberg against MasterClass.

Meta Responds to User Complaints by Introducing Feeds for Threads

Meta, the parent company of social media giant Facebook, has recently revealed its plans to introduce feeds for Threads, a messaging app designed for close friends. This move comes in response to user complaints about the lack of a central content hub and the need for a more streamlined user experience. The company aims to enhance the app's functionality and provide a more engaging platform for users to connect and share content.

According to reports from BBC News, Meta's decision to introduce feeds for Threads follows numerous user complaints regarding the app's limited capabilities and disjointed user interface. Users have expressed their desire for a central hub where they can view and interact with content shared by their friends, similar to the experience offered by other social media platforms. Responding to this feedback, Meta plans to incorporate feeds into Threads to address these concerns and improve the overall user experience.

In an official statement, Meta spokesperson Jonathan Anderson stated, "We have taken note of the feedback we received from Threads users. We understand the importance of creating a cohesive and engaging environment for our users, and we are actively working on implementing feeds within the app. This will allow users to easily navigate and interact with the content shared by their friends, enhancing their overall experience on Threads."

The addition of feeds to Threads is expected to offer several benefits to users. It will provide a central content hub where users can view and engage with posts, photos, and videos shared by their friends. This new feature aims to foster a sense of community and encourage more active participation within the app. Moreover, the inclusion of feeds will enable users to stay up-to-date with the latest content from their close friends without having to navigate through multiple screens or individual conversations.

Meta's decision to address user feedback and enhance Threads aligns with the company's ongoing efforts to improve user satisfaction and retain a competitive edge in the social media landscape. By implementing feeds within the app, Meta aims to offer a more intuitive and enjoyable user experience, attracting and retaining users who value close-knit connections and personalized content sharing.

While Meta has not disclosed a specific timeline for the release of feeds on Threads, users can anticipate an update in the near future. The company remains committed to actively listening to user feedback and implementing changes that enhance the functionality and usability of its platforms.

Will Threads be a 'Threat' to Twitter?


About Threads

Meta, Instagram’s parent company launched Threads, which will be a text-based conversation app, rivaling Twitter.

Threads, released on Wednesday evening, a day before its scheduled release, allows users to join up directly from their Instagram accounts; it is a platform that allows users to publish short posts or updates that are up to 500 characters. They can include links, photos, or videos up to 5 minutes long.

More than 2 billion monthly active users will be able to import their accounts into Threads once it is made available to everyone.

Threads now have 70 million signups, according to a Friday morning post by Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and that number is certain to rise over the next few days. (In comparison, Instagram has 1.3 billion users that log on every day. Twitter has 259 million daily active users at the end of 2022. 13 million accounts in total are on Mastodon.)

A Threat to Twitter

Adam Mosseri, the CEO of Instagram, claimed that under Musk, Twitter's "volatility" and "unpredictability" gave Instagram the chance to compete. According to Mosseri in an interview, Threads is made for "public conversations," which is an obvious reference to how Twitter executives have described the service's function throughout the years.

In regards to its threads’ competitor space, Mosseri says “Obviously, Twitter pioneered the space[…]And there are a lot of good offerings out there for public conversations. But just given everything that was going on, we thought there was an opportunity to build something that was open and something that was good for the community that was already using Instagram.”

For some time now, Meta has been getting ready to introduce Threads, which it calls a "sanely run" substitute for Twitter. The response to Musk's recent limitation on how many tweets people may watch per day, according to internal business documents I've seen, served as the impetus for this week's app release. Furthermore, they assert that Meta expects "tens of millions" of users to use Threads within the first few months of its release.

As described by Mosseri, Thread is a “risky endeavor,” especially considering that it's a brand-new program that users must download. After receiving access to Threads earlier, users were able to rapidly fill out account information and follow lists by having Meta automatically pull information from my Instagram account.

In many important aspects, Threads is surprisingly similar to Twitter. Posts (or, as Mosseri refers to them, "threads") from accounts you follow are displayed in the app's main feed along with accounts that Instagram's algorithm has recommended. Reposting something allows you to add users’ opinions, and main feed answers are clearly shown. Though it might be added later, there is no feed that solely contains the people you follow.

Since Twitter has been around for a while and has amassed a distinctive network, it presents another element that Threads must deal with. It is evident from Meta's behavior that, despite Musk's theatrics over the previous few months, unseating Twitter would not be easy. It would be a mistake, in Mosseri's opinion, to "undervalue Twitter and Elon." The community on Twitter is tremendously powerful and vibrant, and it has a long history. The network effects are very powerful.

Meta's Ambitious Move: Launching a Dedicated App to Challenge Twitter's Dominance

 


There is talk that Meta, the Mark Zuckerberg company, is working on developing a rival for Twitter shortly since it has been announced that it wants public figures to join it, including the Dalai Lama and Oprah Winfrey, who are either planning to use it or will refer to it as a rival for Twitter. 

This standalone application is codenamed Project92, but a report by tech news site The Verge suggests that the official title could be Threads. This is based on its codename.

During an internal meeting on Thursday, Meta's chief product officer, Chris Cox, told employees that the app was Meta's response to Twitter, the social network owned by Facebook and Instagram. 

In addition to allowing users to follow accounts they already follow on Instagram, Meta's image-sharing application may also offer them the opportunity to bring over followers they previously had on decentralized platforms such as Mastodon, if they choose to do so. 

Meta spokesperson says the platform is being developed and released soon. According to Chris Cox, Meta's chief product officer, Meta's platform is currently being coded. There is no specific date for releasing the app though the tech giant intends to do so very soon. Several sources speculate that the launch could happen as early as June, but that is still far from certain. 

In recent weeks, screenshots of the company's upcoming app have surfaced online, providing a glimpse of how it might look shortly. The screenshots were shown internally to senior employees.

This BBC report is based on confirmation made to the BBC by sources within the company that these screenshots are genuine. The new platform layout will likely be familiar to people who use Twitter as a social media platform.

The screenshot shows that Meta will allow users to log in with their Facebook or Instagram ID number. This will save them the hassle of creating their ID number later. There are several options available to users for how to share their thoughts in a Twitter-style prompt, with other users able to like, comment, and re-share (basically retweet) their posts. Further, based on the screenshot, it appears that users may also be able to create a thread as well, which is a tangle of posts placed one after the other in a particular order. 

Moreover, according to The Verge, the app would be integrated with ActivityPub, a technology underpinning Mastodon, a decentralized collection of thousands of web pages that serves as a Twitter rival. This technology will allow social networks to interact with each other more easily. Theoretically speaking, users of the upcoming Meta app can move their accounts and followers over to apps supported by ActivityPub, like Mastodon, the new Meta app. 

The app is expected to be based on Instagram and users will be able to log in with their Instagram username and password, while their followers, user bio, and verification information will also transfer over to the new app as well, according to earlier reports. 

The app aims to give creators a "stable place to build and grow their audience" in addition to providing a safe, easy-to-use, and reliable place to create. 

There is no question that Elon Musk's Twitter will be facing a lot of opposition from the short text-based network P92, which has the potential to surpass both BlueSky and Mastodon in terms of its level of rivalry with Elon Musk's Twitter. The fact that both Mastodon and BlueSky have attracted users who were disillusioned with Twitter is a testament to the fact that building your social network from scratch and reestablishing the community from scratch is not easy.

Meta's Instagram community, however, is enormous, boasting more than a billion users worldwide. This far surpasses Twitter's estimated 300 million users, although Twitter's numbers are no longer verifiable. 

Moreover, the report points out that Meta, which is inspired by Twitter, will be able to populate a user's info via Instagram's account system in much the same way as Twitter does. A Meta spokesperson reportedly told me on the sidelines of the meeting that the company has already been working with prominent personalities such as Oprah Winfrey and the Dalai Lama to attract others to try the "Project 92" web app by joining the platform. 

As Musk has said, Twitter under his leadership has been experiencing a difficult time, although he has insisted Twitter's users have not declined since the Tesla boss purchased the platform back in October. Musk claimed several weeks after purchasing Twitter that a peak of more than 250 million daily active users had been achieved. This was a record high then. Because Twitter is based almost entirely on advertising revenue, it is experiencing financial difficulties. 

Several concerns were responsible for the current advertiser boycott, including the degradation of the platform's moderation standards and the botched re-launch of Twitter's subscription service. This led to several verified impersonator accounts that started appearing on the platform. 

There is no doubt Meta has made a bold and ambitious move in entering the social media landscape with its announcement that it will launch a dedicated app to compete with Twitter's dominance in its space. By reshaping how people engage in real-time conversations in real-time, Meta has the potential to disrupt the status quo and disrupt people's social norms. 

The battle for microblogging supremacy intensifies as users eagerly await the release of this new app. It promises to be an exciting and transformational time in online communication as the world becomes more integrated.

Mata: Challenges in Data Transfer Between Countries May Affect Services


Meta, in a recent report, stated how its inability to transfer data "between countries and regions," where the company operates, may alter its ability to provide services to its users. The company added that this issue may further affect its financial results.

Apparently, Meta has been facing lawsuits in Europe and India, along with other jurisdictions for its 2016 and 2021 updates on WhatsApp on the basis of its service and privacy policy.

In a statement provided on Wednesday, Meta wrote, "If we are unable to transfer data between and among countries and regions in which we operate, or if we are restricted from sharing data among our products and services, it could affect our ability to provide our services, the manner in which we provide our services or our ability to target ads, which could adversely affect our financial results."

The multinational conglomerate further noted that countries like India and Turkey are apparently considering enacting legislation that requires local data storage and processing or is considering doing so already.

These legislative laws “could increase the cost and complexity of delivering our services, cause us to cease the offering of our products and services in certain countries, or result in fines or other penalties," the company said in Form 10-K.

The company has been under continuous legal and regulatory issues in a number of jurisdictions, one being India.

The Competition Commission of India is currently looking into the issue, investigating Meta for its alleged anti-competitive practices. Adding to this, the company is also facing lawsuits in regard to its unified payments interface (UPI) service WhatsApp Pay.

Amidst the ongoing investigations and legal actions, Amrita Mukherjee, Director, Legal, India operations, was purportedly fired by the corporation as part of a recent series of layoffs. The layoff has been a component of Meta's downsizing strategy, which was disclosed in March and will affect some 10,000 employees worldwide.

The issue is especially significant for Meta, since it has a weighty presence in India, with more than half a billion users utilizing its services.

The company's daily active users (DAUs) grew by 4% to 2 billion on average through December 2022 from the previous year, according to its annual report. The top three countries for DAU growth during that time were Bangladesh, the Philippines, and India.  

AI: the cause of the metaverse's demise?

 


In a dramatic change from its past plans to create a virtual world known as "the metaverse," Facebook has taken a completely different direction that has not been seen before. It was a project that consumed billions of dollars and resulted in a cumulative loss of $26 billion, despite spending billions on it. As a result, Facebook and other companies were forced to die in the metaverse due to investor pressure, forcing them to pursue the latest trend: artificial intelligence.

After being abandoned by the business world, the Metaverse, a once-hot technology that promised to give users a disorienting video-game-like virtual world in which to interact awkwardly, has died years after being touted as a future new era in communication technology. It had been around for three years at that time. 

As CEO of Meta Platforms, Mark Zuckerberg abandoned his ambitious project, Metaverse, to focus on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the AI industry. Zuckerberg was planning to launch the Metaverse as his next big thing, but he chose to quietly shelve the project indefinitely. 

Facebook's CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced in a post on Monday, 27 February, that Meta would establish an artificial intelligence product group dedicated to generative artificial intelligence. 

There was a time when the advent of the Metaverse was touted as the dawn of a dynamic, remote interactive environment. It was regarded as a turning point in technology. Despite its success, it faced severe criticism and backlash when it became the talk of the town. This was when it became a phenomenon. In recent years, people's interest in these topics has rapidly declined. Mark Zuckerberg reintroduced the metaverse concept, he is no longer pitching it to advertisers for the same reason. 

The virtual estate is becoming more popular. The price of Ethereum, the cryptocurrency that powers so much of this activity has a direct impact on the value of virtual land in this metaverse. While Ethereum prices have been volatile recently, many buyers and sellers struggle to keep up with the market. 

WeMeta also reports that virtual land parcel average sale prices have plummeted from over US$11,000 over the past year to under US$2,000, a significant drop compared to physical land parcel average sales prices. 

There has also been a remarkable 85% decline in virtual land sales in 2022. Ethereum-based metaverse projects, such as Decentraland and Sandbox, are seeing significant reductions in their valuations and other significant metrics as a result. 

In February 2022, some of the highest prices for land sold across Decentraland ever reached, at the time of this writing, an average of US$37,200 per acre. As a result, by August, their average value had fallen to US$5,100, a decrease of approximately 25 percent. Furthermore, Sandbox's average sale price dropped between US$35,500 in January and US$2,800 in August. This was with the same price falling from around US$35,500 in January. 

A substantial level of uncertainty has been introduced to the market by the volatility of cryptocurrency prices, specifically Ethereum. This has left investors uncertain about virtual investments. Furthermore, there is a lack of proper infrastructure, governance, and collaboration within this version of the metaverse at present. In that regard, it may be that some people believe the metaverse is nothing more than a marketing gimmick at the moment. 

The Metaverse has now joined the list of failed tech ideas buried at the deep end of the graveyard. The fact that the Metaverse was born and died in a way that angers the tech world shows the extent to which the industry was influenced by technology. 

As technology advances through AI, there is a real possibility of revolutionizing how consumers and businesses run their businesses. This is evidenced by the shift to AI. A chatbot powered by artificial intelligence can help automate repetitive tasks efficiently. A search engine powered by AI, such as ChatGPT, can interact with queries in a human-like fashion. As Reality Labs places more emphasis on AI, it may reduce company losses and open new possibilities for the company to tap into in the future.

AI, one of the fastest-developing fields, continues to make rapid advances in many industries today. These industries include marketing, media, and even healthcare, as the sector develops rapidly. According to Gartner, a leading research company, generative AI in these fields is predicted to grow dramatically shortly. By 2025, large organizations will create more outbound marketing messages from less than 2 percent to 30%. This is a dramatic increase from outbound marketing messages in 2022. However, generative AI won't be the only impact on society. 

In the transition from text to video, 90% of the content could be handled by AI by 2030, according to Gartner's projections. This would be possible because 90% of the content would come from AI and the rest from human input. 

Generative artificial intelligence has vast possibilities, but its access is not as wide as it could be. As an example, ChatGPT, as well as its mechanisms, are not open-sourced, meaning it is not available to the public in any way. Other companies would find it difficult to replicate this model because of this limitation. While Facebook intends to make these types of AI models smaller, this will, in turn, make them more accessible and easier to use for companies. This will enable generative AI to become more widespread and widely available in the future. 

There have been some reports suggesting that this is the end of the metaverse. However, other reports have suggested that we shouldn't think of Meta's redirection as a rejection of the metaverse at large. As an example, computer scientist Roy Amara developed Amara's Law. This states that humans often misjudge technology's timing and potential, overestimating or underestimating their short-term impact, and drastically underestimating their lasting impact in the long run. Skepticism and hype surrounding emerging technologies, such as self-driving cars, virtual reality (VR), and augmented reality (AR) are examples of this tendency. This is evident in the skepticism and hype surrounding these systems. It was once considered a fad to think that the internet would be a thing of the past. 

It may also be that AI, especially generative AI, can lead to more convincing environments and characters in the metaverse. This could lead to significant advancements in the metaverse as a whole.  

The fact is that some deny the metaverse's death and even its waning popularity. This is especially true for women. It is predicted that the metaverse will succeed in the future as many companies employ it. 

Nevertheless, for this to happen, it will be necessary to implement some structural changes within the organization. For VR headsets to be affordable and more private, they will need to be sold at a significantly lower price. 

In the beginning, all inventions were just ideas—ones that had the potential to be terrifying, despite this, as time goes on, these small technological innovations become increasingly integrated into our daily lives to such a degree that we cannot imagine a world without them any longer. It may be that the metaverse tends toward this fate. Perhaps another immersive technological invention will replace it as soon as possible, so it must be discussed whether or not it will emerge again.

A metaverse can be described as a virtual platform that creates a social network of sorts. There is potential here. Nonetheless, it should be remembered that a fully functional system should be able to integrate interactive technologies such as VR, AR, and AI. It should however be noted that generative AI does not necessarily spell the end of the metaverse itself. However, they could benefit each other's development by promoting each other's success.

Facebook Shares Private Information With NHS Trusts

 


In a report published by The Observer, NHS trusts have been revealed to share private information with Facebook. As a result of a newspaper investigation, it was discovered that all of the websites of 20 NHS trusts were using a covert tracking tool to collect browsing data that was shared with the tech giant, it is a major breach of privacy that violated patient privacy. 

The trust has assured people that it will not collect personal information about them. It has not obtained the consent of the people involved in the process. Data were collected showing the pages people visited, the buttons they clicked, and the keywords they searched for.

As part of the system, the user's IP address was matched with the data and often the data was associated with their Facebook account details. 

A person's medical condition, the doctor's appointment, and the treatments they have received may be known once this information is matched with their medical information. 

Facebook might use it for advertising campaigns related to its business objectives as part of its business strategy. 

The news of this weekend's breach of Meta Pixel has caused panic across the NHS trust community. This is due to 17 of the 20 trusts using the tracking tool taking drastic measures, even apologizing for the incident. 

How does a Meta Pixel tracker work? What is it all about? 

Meta's advertising tracking tool allows companies to track visitor activity on their web pages and gain a deeper understanding of their actions. 

A meta-pixel has been identified as an element of 33 hospital websites where, whenever someone clicks on an appointment button to make an appointment, Facebook receives “a packet of data” from the Meta Pixel. Data about an individual household may be associated with an IP address, which in turn can be linked to its specific IP address. 

It has been reported that eight doctors have apologized to their patients. Furthermore, multiple trusts were unaware they sent patient data to Facebook. This was when they installed tracking pixels to monitor recruitment and charity campaigns. They thought they monitored recruitment specifically. The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has proceeded with its investigation despite this and privacy experts have verbally expressed their concerns in concert as well.

As a result of the research findings, the Meta Pixel has been removed from the Friedrich Hospital website. 

Piedmont Healthcare used Meta Pixels to collect data about patients' upcoming doctor appointments through Piedmont Healthcare's patient portal. These data included patients' names, dates, and times of appointments. 

Privacy experts have expressed concern over these findings, who are concerned that they indicate widespread potential breaches of patient confidentiality and data protection that are in their view “completely unacceptable ”. 

There is a possibility that the company will receive health information of a special category, which is legally protected in certain situations. As defined by the law, health information consists of information that relates to an individual's health status, such as medical conditions, tests, treatments, or any other information that relates to health. 

It is impossible to determine the exact usage of the data once it is accessed by Facebook's servers. The company states that the submission of sensitive medical data to the company is prohibited. It has filters in place to weed out such information if it is received accidentally. 

As several of the trusts involved explained, they originally implemented the tracking pixel to monitor recruitment or charity campaigns. They had no idea that patient information is sent to Facebook as part of that process. 

BHNHST, a healthcare trust in the town of Buckinghamshire, has removed the tracking tool from its website. It has been commented that the appearance of Meta Pixel on this site was an unintentional error on the part of the organization. 

When BHNHST users accessed a patient handbook about HIV medications, it appears that BHNHST shared some information with Facebook as a result of the access. According to the report, this data included details such as the name of the drug, the trust's name, the user's IP address, and the details of their Instagram account. 

In its privacy policy, the trust has made it explicitly clear that any consumer health information collected by it will not be used for marketing purposes without the consumer's explicit consent. 

When Alder Hey Children's Trust in Liverpool was linked to Facebook each time a user accessed a webpage related to a sexual development issue, a crisis mental health service, or an eating disorder, the organization also shared information with Facebook. 

Professor David Leslie, director of ethics at the Alan Turing Institute, warned that the transfer of patient information to third parties by the National Health Service would erode the "delicate relationship of trust" between the NHS and its patients. When accessing an NHS website, we have a reasonable expectation that our personal information will not be extracted and shared with third-party advertising companies or companies that might use it to target ads or link our personal information to health conditions."

According to Wolfie Christl, a data privacy expert who has been researching the ad tech industry to find out what is happening, "This should have been stopped long ago by regulators, rather than what is happening now. This is unacceptable in any way, and it must stop immediately as it is irresponsible and negligent." 

20 NHS trusts in England use the tracking tool to find their locations. Together the 20 trusts cover a 22 million population in England, reaching from Devon to the Pennines. Several people had used it for many years before it was discontinued. 

Moreover, Meta is facing litigation over allegations that it intentionally received sensitive health information - including information taken from health portals - and did not take any steps to prevent it. Several plaintiffs have filed lawsuits against Meta, alleging it violated their medical privacy by intercepting and selling their individually identifiable health information from its partner websites. T

Meta stated that the trusts had been contacted to remind them of the privacy policies in place, essentially to prohibit the sharing of health information between the organization and Meta. 

"Our corporate communication department educates advertisers on the proper use of business tools to avoid this kind of situation," the spokesperson added. The group added that it was the owner's responsibility to make sure that the website complied with all applicable data protection laws and that consent was obtained before sending any personal information. 

Several questions have been raised concerning the effectiveness of its filters designed to weed out potentially sensitive, or what types of information would be blocked from hospital websites by the company. They also refused to explain why NHS trusts could send the data in the first place. 

According to the company, advertisers can use its business software tools to grow their business by using health-based advertising to help them achieve their business goals. There are several guides available on its website on how it can display ads to its users that "might be of interest" by leveraging data collected by its business tools. If you look at travel websites, for instance, you might see ads for hotel deals appearing on the website. 

Meta was accused of not complying with part of GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation), in the sense that it moved Facebook users' data from one country to another without permission, according to the DPC. 

Meta Ireland was fined a record fine on Meta Ireland from the European Commission. This order orders it to suspend any future transfers of personal data to the US within five months. They have also ordered the company to stop any future data transfer to the US within the same period. Meta imposed an unjustified fine, according to the company.