Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Showing posts with label IT Act. Show all posts

TRAI Seeks IT Act Powers to Act Against Spam-Tagging Apps Like Truecaller

 

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) seeks new powers in the Information Technology (IT) Act to take action against call management apps, including Truecaller, Hiya, and Whoscall, for marking or blocking legitimate commercial calls as spam. The regulator has requested additional authority to act against call management apps for misidentifying or blocking approved commercial numbers. 

Sources said TRAI wanted to act against call management apps for misidentifying or blocking approved commercial numbers. Numbers in the 1400 and 1600 series have been designated for official promotional and customer service purposes. TRAI does not have the authority to prosecute such digital platforms because, unlike telecom licensees, who are bound by TRAI’s directions issued under the Telecom Regulation Act, they function as information intermediaries under the IT Act. 

However, authorities said TRAI had sought amendments to the IT Act to designate it as an “authorized agency” to notify such digital platforms of alleged violations of the IT Act, directing them to stop or take steps to bring their services within the bounds of the law. Authorities said the electronics and information technology ministry had approved the proposal in principle and that DoT would take up the needed legislative action with the ministry. However, authorities said TRAI did not seek to regulate call identifier apps but that the regulator felt that as information intermediaries, they should follow the laws and regulations administered by TRAI. 

Authorities felt that such apps’ labeling or blocking of numbers in the 1400 and 1600 series not only deprived authorized users of a reliable means of reaching out to them but also disrupted government-led outreach efforts, especially those using numbers in these series. Authorities said such interference disincentivized enterprises from using the 1400 and 1600 series of numbers and tempted them to use ordinary 10-digit mobile numbers for customer outreach. 

This defeats the purpose of having designated numbers since it becomes difficult for consumers to differentiate between legitimate and fraudulent callers, ultimately undermining consumer confidence and making it easier for spammers to masquerade as legitimate entities. Truecaller said in a statement reacting to the reports that it complied with the TRAI regulations about commercial numbers. 

The firm stated that it did not put spam labels over or block numbers in the 1400 and 1600 series despite being reported as spam on its app by many users. India seeks to balance consumer rights and obligations by regulating commercial communications while ensuring that legitimate communication avenues are not cut off for businesses that use spam calls to sell or inform the public.

Clause Addition to the IT Act; Social Media Companies Now Responsible For All Nonuser Generated Content


A change brought in line with the changes in the US and Europe, the Indian government has recently added a clause to the proposed IT intermediary guidelines, making social media companies responsible for all nonuser produced content including supported content, distributed on their platforms. 

The change is expected to impact some extremely popular social media platforms, like Twitter, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram as well as Facebook. 

When the amended guidelines are made public, social media organizations will be required to accordingly and appropriately tag and identify all sponsored content published on their platforms and alongside it, draft standards, which are 'under consideration' of the law ministry, are expected to be notified in about a few weeks according to a senior government official “We have had a few rounds of discussions with the law ministry. 

These guidelines should be notified by February-end, the start of March.” Section 79-II of the Information Technology Act, 2000, right now absolves online intermediaries from obligation for any third party substance shared on their platform. In any case, with the new clause, the Act will give "safe harbor protection" to intermediaries, inasmuch as they just assume the job of a facilitator and not maker or modifier, in any way of the content posted.


What expedited the change was an issue that occurred in the previous year a disagreement regarding content between social media platform TikTok and Twitter-sponsored ShareChat where the latter had to bring down more than 100 videos from its platform. 

Right now, platforms like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram have certain features and tags through which ads and paid partnerships are displayed. Yet, publicists and advertisers state brands would rather push content through influencers to make it look increasingly organic. 

There is likewise no compulsion or onus on the influencers to highlight that the products and content they are supporting are paid for. 

However, Government authorities said such content, produced by influencers without the contribution of the social media platforms, may in any case not be secured by the most recent clause. This clause will relate to just such non-user produced content in which the platform is in some way involved.