Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Supply Chain. Show all posts

Microsoft Announces the Microsoft Supply Chain Platform


Software as a Service (SaaS) applications from Microsoft that combine artificial intelligence, collaboration, low-code, security, and supply chain management have been launched as the Microsoft Supply Chain Platform.

Dynamics 365, Microsoft Teams, Power BI, Power Automate, Power Apps, Azure Machine Learning,
Azure Synapse Analytics, Azure IoT, the Microsoft Intelligent Data Platform, Azure Active Directory,
Defender for IoT and Microsoft Security Services for Enterprise are among the Microsoft
applications and platforms in this group.
Microsoft's PowerApps low-code development platform is intended to let users create a connected supply chain. It enables supply chain information, supply and demand insights, performance tracking, supplier management, real-time collaboration, and demand management to lessen risk.

Additionally, it addresses order tracking and traceability, pricing management, warehouse
management, and inventory optimization. According to Microsoft, businesses are suffering from an overabundance of petabytes of data that are dispersed among legacy systems, enterprise resource planning (ERP) software, and custom solutions, giving them a fragmented view of their supply chain.

The Microsoft Supply Chain Center preview has also been released by Microsoft. It promises to track global events that may impact a customer's supply chain, coordinate actions across a supply chain, and use AI to lessen supply and demand mismatches. According to Microsoft, this constitutes the foundation of the supply chain platform.

"Although supply chain disruption is not new, its complexity and the rate of change are outpacing organizations' ability to address issues at a global scale. Many solutions today are narrowly focused on supply chain execution and management and are not ready to support this new reality," said Charles Lamanna, corporate vice president, of Microsoft Business Applications and Platform, in a press release.

"Businesses are dealing with petabytes of data spread across legacy systems, ERP, supply chain management and point solutions, resulting in a fragmented view of the supply chain," Lamanna stated. 

"Supply chain agility and resilience are directly tied to how well organizations connect and orchestrate their data across all relevant systems. The Microsoft Supply Chain Platform and Supply Chain Center enable organizations to make the most of their existing investments to gain insights and act quickly." 

Even though it wants to serve as a platform for the entire supply chain, it will continue to collaborate with businesses like Accenture, Avanade, EY, KPMG, PwC, and TCS. Data from standalone supply chain systems, SAP and Oracle ERP systems, Dynamics 365, and other systems will be fed into the Microsoft Supply Chain Center.

Data ingestion for supply chain visibility is made possible via the Supply Chain Center's Data Manager capability. FedEx, FourKites, Overhaul, and C.H. Robinson are some of the partners in the preview launch. The supply and demand insights module, the order management module, the built-in Teams connection, and partner modules within the center are just a few of the prebuilt modules that the Supply Chain Center provides to solve supply chain disruptions.

According to Microsoft, the data remains consistent regardless of the module used because the center runs on a Dataverse common data service environment, eliminating the need to check which reports have the most recent data.

GitHub Introduces Private Flaw Reporting to Secure Software Supply Chain


GitHub, a Microsoft-owned code hosting platform, has announced the launch of a direct channel for security researchers to report vulnerabilities in public repositories that allow it. The new private vulnerability reporting capability allows repository administrators to enable security researchers to report any vulnerabilities found in their code to them. 

Some repositories may include instructions on how to contact the maintainers for vulnerability reporting, but for those that do not, researchers frequently report issues publicly. Whether the researcher reports the vulnerability through social media or by creating a public issue, this method may make vulnerability details insufficiently public. 

To avoid such situations, GitHub has implemented private reporting, which allows researchers to contact repository maintainers who are willing to enroll directly. If the functionality is enabled, the reporting security researchers are given a simple form to fill out with information about the identified problem.

According to GitHub, "anyone with admin access to a public repository can enable and disable private vulnerability reporting for the repository." When a vulnerability is reported, the repository maintainer is notified and can either accept or reject the report or ask additional questions about the issue.

According to GitHub, the benefits of the new capability include the ability to discuss vulnerability details privately, receiving reports directly on the same platform where the issue is discussed and addressed, initiating the advisory report, and a lower risk of being contacted publicly.

Private vulnerability reporting can be enabled from the repository's main page's 'Settings' section, in the 'Security' section of the sidebar, under 'Code security and analysis.' Once the functionality is enabled, security researchers can submit reports by clicking on a new 'Report a vulnerability' button on the repository's 'Advisories' page.

The private vulnerability reporting was announced at the GitHub Universe 2022 global developer event, along with the general availability of CodeQL support for Ruby, a new security risk and coverage view for GitHub Enterprise users, and funding for open-source developers.

The platform will provide a $20,000 incentive to 20 developers who maintain open-source repositories through the new GitHub Accelerator initiative. While, the new $10 million M12 GitHub Fund will support future open-source companies.

Feds, npm Issue Supply Chain Security Alert to Avoid Another SolarWinds


The lessons learned from the SolarWinds software supply chain attack were turned into tangible guidance this week when the United States Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA), the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), and the National Security Agency (NSA) released a joint best practises framework for developers to prevent future supply chain attacks.

In addition to the recommendations from the US government, developers received npm Best Practices from the Open Source Security Foundation in order to establish supply chain security open-source best practices.

"The developer holds a critical responsibility to the security of our software," the agencies said about the publication, titled Securing the Software Supply Chain for Developers. "As ESF examined the events that led up to the SolarWinds attack, it was clear that investment was needed in creating a set of best practices that focused on the needs of the software developer."

Meanwhile, OpenSSF announced that the npm code repository has grown to encompass 2.1 million packages.

Developers like Michael Burch, director of application security for Security Journey, praise the industry's proactive framework, but Burch adds that it is now up to the cybersecurity sector to put these guidelines into action, particularly a recommendation to implement software bills of materials (SBOMs).

Burch  concluded, "What we need now is the AppSec community to come together on the back of this guidance, and create a standard format and implementation for SBOMs to boost software supply chain security." 

Google Aims to Expand Bug Bounties to its Open Source Projects

What is OSS VRP Initiative

Google is planning to give out cash rewards for information on vulnerabilities found in any of its open source projects as a part of an undergoing attempt to strengthen the security of its open source code. The latest Open Source Software Vulnerability Rewards Program (OSS VRP), which adds to Google's Vulnerability Rewards Program, was declared in a blog post recently. 

According to DarkReading "Google has already offered bounties for bugs in its Chrome browser and the Android mobile operating system, both of whose base code are managed as open source projects. The company paid out $2.9 million to 119 researchers for their reports of vulnerabilities in Android, with the highest reward hitting $157,000. Similarly, the company paid $3.3 million to 115 researchers for finding bugs in Chrome in 2021."

Google pays if you find the bug

Google is willing to pay experts up to $31,337 for giving details on vulnerabilities in open source software programs-specifically those administered by Google- that affect the firm's services and software. 

Google's aim is to protect its own software supply chain, but since many non-Google developers use the company's open source software- like Go programming language and Angular Web framework- the initiative assures to promote securing the wider open source ecosystem too. 

Initially, Google will emphasize critical and most widely used projects, Francis Perron says, who's an open source technical program manager at Google. He wants to provide a high-quality bug-hunting experience, so Google picked projects with enough maturity in their response and processes to test this program. 

The project aims to secure the software supply chain

Widening the scope will happen after Google compiles enough internal data and assures that it can scale up without ruining the projects and experts. Protecting the software supply chain is now a crucial thing for technology firms and policymakers. 

Earlier this year, the Biden administration met with open source organizations and technology firms to explore new ways to promote secure coding, finding more bugs, and speed patching of open source projects. 

In 2021, Google pledged to invest $10 Billion over five years, the favorite effort by the OpenSSF, bringing a cybersecurity advisory group and supporting its Invisible Security zero trust initiative. 

Google is proud to both support and is a part of the open-source software community. Through our existing bug bounty programs, we’ve rewarded bug hunters from over 84 countries and look forward to increasing that number through this new VRP, said Google. 

Cyber-attacks on Port of Los Angeles Doubled Since Pandemic


According to recent research, one of the world's biggest ports has witnessed an unusual spike in cyber-attacks since the outbreak began. The Port of Los Angeles' executive director, Gene Seroka, told the BBC World Service over the weekend that the facility receives roughly 40 million attacks every month. 

"Our intelligence shows the threats are coming from Russia and parts of Europe. We have to stay steps ahead of those who want to hurt international commerce. We must take every precaution against potential cyber-incidents, particularly those that could threaten or disrupt the flow of cargo,” he further added. 

Ransomware, malware, spear phishing, and credential harvesting attacks appear to be among the threats aimed against the facility, which is the busiest in the Western Hemisphere. The goal seems to harm the US economy in many situations, however, profits through extortion and data theft will also be a factor. 

Such dangers, if not adequately managed, can potentially exacerbate COVID-era supply chain snarls. Seroka said that port blockages will not be cleared completely until next year, even though the number of container ships waiting more than two days to offload has reportedly reduced from 109 in January to 20 today. 

"The past two years have proven the vital role that ports hold to our nation's critical infrastructure, supply chains and economy. It's paramount we keep the systems as secure as possible," Seroka expressed. 

The challenge is so acute that the port established one of the world's first Cyber Resilience Centers in collaboration with the FBI. It provides a single site for port stakeholders such as shipping corporations to receive, evaluate, and exchange threat intelligence. 

Ports have become such a popular target for cyber-criminals, particularly those aiming to undermine operations and extort businesses, due to their strategic significance to global trade.

NCSC Suggests to Reconsider Russian Supply Chain Risks


One of the UK's top security agencies has encouraged the public sector, critical infrastructure (CNI), and other institutions to rethink the hazards of any "Russian-controlled" elements of their supply chain. 

There is no evidence that the Russian government is preparing to compel private providers to harm UK interests, according to Ian Levy, technical director of the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC). That doesn't rule out the possibility of it happening or happening in the future, he continued. 

"Russian law already contains legal obligations on companies to assist the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB), and the pressure to do so may increase in a time of war. We also have hacktivists on each side, further complicating matters, so the overall risk has materially changed. The war has proven many widely held beliefs wrong and the situation remains highly unpredictable. In our view, it would be prudent to plan for the possibility that this could happen. In times of such uncertainty, the best approach is to make sure your systems are as resilient as you can reasonably make them,” Levy argued. 

All UK public sector organisations, those supplying services to Ukraine, CNI enterprises, organisations performing the activity that could be regarded as being in opposition to Russian interests, and high-profile institutions whose compromise would be a PR success for the Kremlin are all covered by the new NCSC guidelines. 

Levy continued, “You may choose to remove Russian products and services proactively, wait until your contract expires (or your next tech refresh), or do it in response to some geopolitical event. Alternatively, you may choose to live with the risk. Whatever you choose, remember that cybersecurity, even in a time of global unrest, remains a balance of different risks. Rushing to change a product that’s deeply embedded in your enterprise could end up causing the very damage you’re trying to prevent.” 

Even those companies which aren’t likely to be a target should remember that global sanctions could impact the availability of any Russian technology services. There was some good news from the NCSC. Levy said individuals using Kaspersky products could continue to do so relatively safely. He claimed that “massive, global cyber-attacks” are unlikely to be launched due to the conflict.

Viasat: Acid Rain Virus Disable Satellite Modems


The cyberattack which targeted the KA-SAT satellite broadband service to erase SATCOM modems on February 24 used a newly discovered data wiper virus. It impacted thousands in Ukraine and thousands more across Europe. 

A cybersecurity firm, SentinelOne, claims to have discovered a malware sample, which disrupted internet connectivity on February 24. The malware, called AcidRain, which was also likely utilized in the Viasat breach, is a Unix executable application which is meant to attack MIPS-based devices. This could indicate the attackers' lack of experience with the filesystem and firmware of the targeted devices, or their desire to create a reusable tool.

The same sample came from SkyLogic, the Viasat operator in charge of the damaged network, which is also situated in Italy. The software sample was also tagged with the moniker "ukrop," which could be a reference to the Ukraine Operation. 

The researchers underscored that Viasat did not offer technical indicators of compromise or a detailed incident response report. Instead, rogue commands damaged modems in Ukraine and other European countries, according to the satellite industry. The SentinelOne duo were perplexed as to how valid orders could produce such mayhem in the modem, "scalable disruption is more feasibly performed by delivering an update, script, or executable," they added. 

The program wipes the system and various storage device files completely. AcidRain executes an initial repetitive replacement and removal of non-standard files in the filesystem if the malware is launched as root "Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade and Max van Amerongen," SentinelOne threat experts, revealed. 

The wipers overwrite file structures with up to 0x40000 bytes of data or utilize MEMGETINFO, MEMUNLOCK, MEMERASE, and MEMWRITEOOB input/output control (IOCTL) service calls to erase data on compromised devices. 

The fact Viasat has supplied nearly 30,000 modems to get clients back online since the February 2022 attack and is still shipping more to speed up service restoration, suggests that SentinelOne's supply-chain threat scenario is correct. The IOCTLs used by this virus also resemble those used by the VPNFilter malware 'dstr' wiper plugin, a destructive program linked to Russian GRU hackers. 

The Ukrainian Computer Emergency Response Team recently stated a data wiper known as DoubleZero had been used in assaults on Ukrainian businesses. On the same day that Russia invaded Ukraine, they discovered IsaacWiper, a data wiper, and HermeticWizard, a new worm which dropped HermeticWiper payloads. ESET has discovered a fourth data-destroying malware strain called CaddyWiper, which wipes data across Windows domains and eliminates user data and partition information from associated drivers. 

Microsoft discovered a sixth wiper, now known as WhisperGate, in mid-January, which was being used in data-wiping attacks targeting Ukraine while masquerading as ransomware.

SureMDM Vulnerabilities Expose Organizations to Supply Chain Attacks

A chain of vulnerabilities in 42Gears' SureMDM device management products could have led to a supply chain disruption via the platform. 42Gears, based in Bangalore, was established in 2009 and offers mobile device management and productivity products for organizations with an extensive mobile workforce. 

The website's list consists of major customers, which include Deloitte, Saab, Lufthansa, Thales, Tesco, Intel, etc. Experts at Immersive Labs found and revealed the first flaws to 42Gears on July 6, 2021. A series of extra bugs disclosure along with 'failed' private security patches. 

It means efficient public security fixes were not issued until November 2021 and January 2022. 
"An authentication method can be turned on by the user, but an oversight in the setup allows Linux and Mac devices to bypass the authentication step. This has been fixed in the latest patch, but it is still not the default setting and requires the user to manually enable it," reports Security Week. Earlier in January, 42Gears told Immersive that they continuously applied additional patches beyond the reports by the experts. 

At this moment, Immersive thought that everything necessary for ensuring principles of trustworthy disclosure was done, and they could publicize their discovery. The identified vulnerabilities include a few that affect the 42Gears web console and also other Linux agents. 

But most critical are the web console vulnerabilities. Chaining these will allow a hacker to shut down security tools and enable malware into macOS, Linux, or Android devices that installed SureMDM. The Linux agent flaws can allow an attacker to execute remote code on the systems, mirroring the root user. 

Hackers can use authentication methods against the users via an oversight in the setup that lets Mac and Linux devices evade the authentication level. Security Week reports, "the SureMDM agent vulnerabilities include command injection on the Linux agent. Users with physical access to a device can use a hidden key sequence to launch SureLock (kiosk software included with SureMDM) as the root user. The attacker can then use command injection to gain local privilege escalation."

How To Assess Supply Chain Security For Your Business

No matter which sector your business works in, you have to depend on third parties that provide goods and services to support your business. It doesn't matter if you're a small business or a large organization operating in the manufacturing and supply chain, these third parties are important for your daily work. 

At some point, suppliers interact on-site or digitally with your business, and this makes them a threat factor. Businesses deal with these risk vectors by denying access to these supplies have, for instance, restricting access in a few areas, or using IT and network resources. 

HelpNet Security says "by formalizing supplier assurance processes and using technology to facilitate their execution across all domains, companies can have confidence in the strength of the supply chain, mitigate cyber risks." 

Generally, IT departments keep an eye on official suppliers that your business use for various areas like cloud assistance, it still remains a business challenge to track cyber security challenges from suppliers throughout your company's supply chain. 

To reduce cybersecurity risks, your business should make sure the supplier you work with can be trusted on protecting the security of data, and services that they are given. In today's date, cyberattacks have become sophisticated, they don't attack the primary target but compromise the weakest link in the supply chain. 

How to identify risks? 
Most businesses use a manual approach for assessing their supplies, this includes spreadsheets, Word, or PDF questionnaires via email. However, it is a time-consuming process and cybersecurity risk in itself. Manually processing will make it a challenge for your business to have a clear overview of cybersecurity risks in the supply chain. 

If the data isn't collected on a daily basis, suppliers not able to fill these requirements may go undetected. Even worse, the risks across the supply chain may leave your organization vulnerable to serious cybersecurity implications. If it happens, you're already too late. 

A better approach for risk assessment 

If the data isn't collected on a daily basis, suppliers not able to fill these requirements may go undetected. Even worse, the risks across the supply chain may leave your organization vulnerable to serious cybersecurity implications. 

If it happens, you're already too late."A good framework for supplier assurance requires procurement teams, IT teams, and other departments to work together to ensure they understand each other’s domains, objectives, and responsibilities in terms of cybersecurity and regulatory compliance," reports Helpnet Security. 

Supply Chain Attack Conducted by Darkside Operator


Mandiant researchers have identified a supply chain attack against a CCTV provider by a Darkside ransomware gang affiliate that has been distinguished as UNC2465. UNC2465 and other linked gangs identified by FireEye/Mandiant as UNC2628 and UNC2659 are regarded as one of the key affiliates of the DARKSIDE Group. 

The intrusion began on 18 May 2021, a day after the public suspension of the DARKSIDE general program (Mandiant Advantage background). Mandiant believes that although no ransomware has been discovered, membership groups that have performed DARKSIDE attacks could employ several ransomware affiliate programs and switch to each other at any time. 

Mandiant found that the installers were malicious at the commencement of June and informed the CCTV firm of a possible compromise on this website, making it possible for UNC2465 to substitute legitimate and Trojanised files.

Although Mandiant does not anticipate that many individuals have been affected, this strategy is reported to boost awareness. 

Software supply chain attacks can be very complex, from the recent attacks discovered by FireEye to attacks targeting smaller suppliers. A single infiltration of the software supply chain attack gives access to all businesses running the software of a victim company – in this situation, UNC2465 has modified the installer instead of the software itself.

Mandiant noted in mid-May 2021, that numerous threat players quoted a notice that the operators of the service seemed to share with the DARKSIDE RaaS members. That notification indicated that it had lost the access and would be closing its service to its infrastructure, including its blog, payment, and CDN servers. 

Since then, other underground members have claimed that they are unpaid DARKSIDE affiliates, and in certain cases privately gave forum admins with proof indicating their claims are legitimate. 

Mandiant consulting responded to an intrusion in June 2021; The first vector, which Mandiant found was a trojanized security camera PVR installer from a reputable website. As a result of ongoing infrastructure use and equipment use since October 2020, Mandiant has attributed the general intrusion to DARKSIDE affiliate UNC2465. 

On 18 May 2021, a person accessed the Trojanized link in the concerned organization and installed a ZIP. A chain of Downloads and Scripts was run when the software was installed which led to SMOKEDHAM and afterward NGROK on the computer of the victim. 

Further malware use like BEACON is also reported to have taken place. The trojan program was enabled in Mandiant's opinion between 18 May 2021, and 08 June 2021. 

Mandiant indicates that the majority of publicly identified victims of ransomware shaming websites have progressed steadily over the last month. Despite the recent restriction on posts concerning ransomware in underground forums, threat actors may still exploit private chats and links to find ransomware services.