The heightened use of age verification systems across the internet is directly influencing how people think about online privacy tools. As more governments introduce these requirements, interest in privacy-focused technologies is rising in parallel.
Age verification laws are now being implemented in multiple countries, requiring millions of users to submit personal and often sensitive information before accessing certain websites, particularly those hosting adult or restricted content. While policymakers argue that these rules are necessary to prevent minors from being exposed to harmful material, critics continue to highlight the serious privacy risks associated with handing over such data.
Virtual Private Networks, commonly known as VPNs, are widely marketed as tools designed to protect user privacy and secure online data. In recent months, there has been a noticeable surge in VPN adoption in regions where age verification laws have come into force. This trend was particularly evident in the United Kingdom and the United States during the latter half of 2025, and again in Australia in March 2026.
However, whether VPNs can truly protect users during age verification processes is not a simple yes-or-no question. Their capabilities are limited in certain areas, and understanding both their strengths and weaknesses is essential.
What VPNs Can Protect
At a fundamental level, VPNs work by encrypting a user’s internet connection, which prevents third parties from easily observing online activity. This includes internet service providers, network administrators, and in some cases, government surveillance systems.
When a VPN connection is active, external observers are generally unable to determine which websites or applications a user is accessing. In the context of age verification, this means that third parties monitoring network traffic will not be able to tell whether a user has visited a platform that requires identity checks, provided the VPN is properly configured.
Certain platforms, including X (formerly Twitter), Reddit, and Telegram, have introduced age verification requirements in specific regions. Many adult websites have implemented similar systems.
In addition to hiding browsing activity, VPNs also encrypt the data being transmitted. This ensures that any information entered during the verification process cannot be easily intercepted by external parties while it is in transit. Even after the verification step is completed, ongoing internet activity continues to be routed through the VPN’s secure tunnel, maintaining a level of privacy.
Modern VPN services are also evolving into broader cybersecurity platforms. Leading providers such as NordVPN, Surfshark, and ExpressVPN now offer additional tools beyond basic encryption. These may include password management systems, encrypted cloud storage, antivirus protection, and identity theft monitoring services.
Some of these services also provide features such as dark web monitoring, financial compensation options in cases of identity theft, credit tracking, and access to support teams that assist users in resolving security incidents. These added layers can help reduce the impact if personal data submitted during an age verification process is later exposed or misused.
One of the central criticisms of age verification systems is the cybersecurity risk they introduce. In this context, advanced VPN subscriptions can offer tools that help users respond to potential data breaches, even if they cannot prevent them entirely.
What VPNs Cannot Protect
Despite their advantages, VPNs are not a complete solution for online anonymity. They do not eliminate all risks, nor do they make users invisible.
In the case of age verification, a VPN cannot prevent the verification provider from accessing the information that a user voluntarily submits. Organizations such as Yoti, Persona, and AgeGo are responsible for processing this data. These companies will still be able to view, verify, and in many cases temporarily store personal details.
Typical verification methods require users to submit sensitive information such as credit card details, government-issued identification documents, or biometric inputs like selfies. This data is directly accessible to the verification service, regardless of whether a VPN is being used.
Data retention practices vary between providers. For example, Yoti states that it deletes user data immediately after verification unless further review is required. In cases where manual checks are necessary, the data may be retained for up to 28 days.
The longer personal information remains stored, the greater the potential risk to user privacy and security. This concern has already been validated by real-world incidents. In October 2025, Discord experienced a data breach in which attackers accessed information related to users who had requested manual reviews of their age verification results.
It is important to understand that any personal data submitted online can potentially be used to identify an individual. The use of a VPN does not change this fundamental reality.
Why VPN Interest Is Increasing
The expansion of age verification systems has given rise to public awareness of online privacy issues. As a result, many users are exploring VPNs as a way to better protect themselves.
At the same time, some individuals are attempting to use VPNs to bypass age verification requirements altogether. This is typically done by connecting to servers located in countries where such laws have not yet been implemented. However, this approach is not consistently reliable and does not guarantee success, as many platforms use additional verification mechanisms beyond geographic location.
Final Considerations
VPNs remain an important tool for strengthening online privacy, particularly when it comes to protecting browsing activity and securing data in transit. However, they are not a complete safeguard against all risks associated with age verification systems.
Users should also be cautious when choosing a VPN provider. Many free services operate on business models that involve collecting and monetizing user data, which can undermine privacy rather than protect it. In contrast, reputable paid VPN services generally offer stronger security features and more transparent data handling practices.
Among paid options, some lower-cost services are widely marketed to new users entering the VPN space. For instance, Surfshark has been advertised at approximately $1.99 per month under long-term plans, while PrivadoVPN has promoted multi-year subscriptions priced near $1.11 per month.
However, pricing alone should not be the deciding factor. Security architecture, logging policies, and transparency practices remain far more critical when evaluating whether a VPN service genuinely protects user privacy. While VPNs can reduce certain risks, they cannot fully protect personal information once it has been directly shared with a verification service.
Various mental health mobile applications with over millions of downloads on Google Play have security flaws that could leak users’ personal medical data.
Researchers found over 85 medium and high-severity vulnerabilities in one of the apps that can be abused to hack users' therapy data and privacy.
Few products are AI companions built to help people having anxiety, clinical depression, bipolar disorder and stress.
Six of the ten studied applications said that user chats are private and encoded safely on the vendor's servers.
Oversecured CEO Sergey Toshin said that “Mental health data carries unique risks. On the dark web, therapy records sell for $1,000 or more per record, far more than credit card numbers.”
Experts scanned ten mobile applications promoted as tools that help with mental health issues, and found 1,575 security flaws: 938 low-severity, 538 medium-severity, and 54 rated high-severity.
No critical issues were found, a few can be leveraged to hack login credentials, HTML injection, locate the user, or spoof notifications.
Experts used the Oversecured scanner to analyse the APK files of the mental health apps for known flaw patterns in different categories.
Using Intent.parseUri() on an externally controlled string, one treatment app with over a million downloads launches the generated messaging object (intent) without verifying the target component.
This makes it possible for an attacker to compel the application to launch any internal activity, even if it isn't meant for external access.
Oversecured said, “Since these internal activities often handle authentication tokens and session data, exploitation could give an attacker access to a user’s therapy records.”
Another problem is storing data locally that gives read access to all apps on the device. This can expose therapy details, depending on the saved data. Therapy details such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), session notes, therapy entries. Experts found plaintext configuration data and backend API endpoints inside the APK resources.
“These apps collect and store some of the most sensitive personal data in mobile: therapy session transcripts, mood logs, medication schedules, self-harm indicators, and in some cases, information protected under HIPAA,” Oversecured said.
A newly launched U.S. mobile carrier is questioning long-standing telecom practices by offering phone service without requiring customers to submit personal identification. The company, Phreeli, presents itself as a privacy-focused alternative in an industry known for extensive data collection.
Phreeli officially launched in early December and describes its service as being built with privacy at its core. Unlike traditional telecom providers that ask for names, residential addresses, birth dates, and other sensitive information, Phreeli limits its requirements to a ZIP code, a chosen username, and a payment method. According to the company, no customer profiles are created or sold, and user data is not shared for advertising or marketing purposes.
Customers can pay using standard payment cards, or opt for cryptocurrency if they wish to reduce traceable financial links. The service operates entirely on a prepaid basis, with no contracts involved. Monthly plans range from lower-cost options for light usage to higher-priced tiers for customers who require more mobile data. The absence of contracts aligns with the company’s approach, as formal agreements typically require verified personal identities.
Rather than building its own cellular infrastructure, Phreeli operates as a Mobile Virtual Network Operator. This means it provides service by leasing network access from an established carrier, in this case T-Mobile. This model allows Phreeli to offer nationwide coverage without owning physical towers or equipment.
Addressing legal concerns, the company states that U.S. law does not require mobile carriers to collect customer names in order to provide service. To manage billing while preserving anonymity, Phreeli says it uses a system that separates payment information from communication data. This setup relies on cryptographic verification to confirm that accounts are active, without linking call records or data usage to identifiable individuals.
The company’s privacy policy notes that information will only be shared when necessary to operate the service or when legally compelled. By limiting the amount of data collected from the start, Phreeli argues that there is little information available even in the event of legal requests.
Phreeli was founded by Nicholas Merrill, who previously operated an internet service provider and became involved in a prolonged legal dispute after challenging a government demand for user information. That experience reportedly influenced the company’s data-minimization philosophy.
While services that prioritize anonymity are often associated with misuse, Phreeli states that it actively monitors for abusive behavior. Accounts involved in robocalling or scams may face restrictions or suspension.
As concerns grow rampant around digital surveillance and commercial data harvesting, Phreeli’s launch sets the stage for a broader discussion about privacy in everyday communication. Whether this model gains mainstream adoption remains uncertain, but it introduces a notable shift in how mobile services can be structured in the United States.
Security specialists at Palo Alto Networks’ Unit 42 have uncovered a complex spyware tool named Landfall that silently infiltrated certain Samsung Galaxy phones for close to a year. The operation relied on a serious flaw in Samsung’s Android image-processing system, which allowed the device to be compromised without the user tapping or opening anything on their screen.
Unit 42 traces the campaign back to July 2024. The underlying bug was later assigned CVE-2025-21042, and Samsung addressed it in a security update released in April 2025. The details of how attackers used the flaw became public only recently, after researchers completed their investigation.
The team emphasizes that even users who browsed risky websites or received suspicious files during that period likely avoided infection. Evidence suggests the operation was highly selective, targeting only specific individuals or groups rather than the general public. Based on submitted samples, the activity was concentrated in parts of the Middle East, including Iraq, Iran, Turkey, and Morocco. Who controlled Landfall remains unknown.
The researchers discovered the spyware while examining earlier zero-click bugs affecting Apple iOS and WhatsApp. Those unrelated flaws showed how attackers could trigger remote code execution by exploiting image-handling weaknesses. This motivated Unit 42 to search for similar risks affecting Android devices. During this process, they found several suspicious files uploaded to VirusTotal that ultimately revealed the Landfall attack chain.
At the center of this operation were manipulated DNG image files. DNG is a raw picture format built on the TIFF standard and is normally harmless. In this case, however, the attackers altered the files so they carried compressed ZIP archives containing malicious components. The image-processing library in Samsung devices had a defect that caused the system to extract and run the embedded code automatically while preparing the image preview. This made the threat a true zero-click exploit because no user action was required for infection.
Once the malware launched, it attempted to rewrite parts of the device’s SELinux security policy. This gave the operators broad system access and made the spyware harder to detect or remove. According to Unit 42, the files appeared to have been delivered through messaging platforms like WhatsApp, disguised as regular images. Code inside the samples referenced models such as the Galaxy S22, S23, S24, Z Flip 4, and Z Fold 4. Samsung believes the vulnerability existed across devices running Android 13, 14, and 15.
After installation, Landfall could gather extensive personal information. It could transmit hardware identifiers, lists of installed apps, contacts, browsing activity, and stored files. It also had the technical ability to activate the device’s microphone or camera for surveillance. The spyware included multiple features to avoid detection, meaning that fully removing it would require deep device repairs or resets.
Unit 42 noted similarities between Landfall’s design and advanced commercial spyware used by major surveillance vendors, but they did not identify any company or group responsible. Although Samsung has already released a fix, attackers could reuse this method on devices that have not installed the April 2025 update or later. Users are urged to check their security patch level to remain protected.
OpenAI has officially entered the web-browsing market with ChatGPT Atlas, a new browser built on Chromium: the same open-source base that powers Google Chrome. At first glance, Atlas looks and feels almost identical to Chrome or Safari. The key difference is its built-in ChatGPT assistant, which allows users to interact with web pages directly. For example, you can ask ChatGPT to summarize a site, book tickets, or perform online actions automatically, all from within the browser interface.
While this innovation promises faster and more efficient browsing, privacy experts are increasingly worried about how much personal data the browser collects and retains.
How ChatGPT Atlas Uses “Memories”
Atlas introduces a feature called “memories”, which allows the system to remember users’ activity and preferences over time. This builds on ChatGPT’s existing memory function, which stores details about users’ interests, writing styles, and previous interactions to personalize future responses.
In Atlas, these memories could include which websites you visit, what products you search for, or what tasks you complete online. This helps the browser predict what you might need next, such as recalling the airline you often book with or your preferred online stores. OpenAI claims that this data collection aims to enhance user experience, not exploit it.
However, this personalization comes with serious privacy implications. Once stored, these memories can gradually form a comprehensive digital profile of an individual’s habits, preferences, and online behavior.
OpenAI’s Stance on Early Privacy Concerns
OpenAI has stated that Atlas will not retain critical information such as government-issued IDs, banking credentials, medical or financial records, or any activity related to adult content. Users can also manage their data manually: deleting, archiving, or disabling memories entirely, and can browse in incognito mode to prevent the saving of activity.
Despite these safeguards, recent findings suggest that some sensitive data may still slip through. According to The Washington Post, an investigation by a technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) revealed that Atlas had unintentionally stored private information, including references to sexual and reproductive health services and even a doctor’s real name. These findings raise questions about the reliability of OpenAI’s data filters and whether user privacy is being adequately protected.
Broader Implications for AI Browsers
OpenAI is not alone in this race. Other companies, including Perplexity with its upcoming browser Comet, have also faced criticism for extensive data collection practices. Perplexity’s CEO openly admitted that collecting browser-level data helps the company understand user behavior beyond the AI app itself, particularly for tailoring ads and content.
The rise of AI-integrated browsers marks a turning point in internet use, combining automation and personalization at an unprecedented scale. However, cybersecurity experts warn that AI agents operating within browsers hold immense control — they can take actions, make purchases, and interact with websites autonomously. This power introduces substantial risks if systems malfunction, are exploited, or process data inaccurately.
What Users Can Do
For those concerned about privacy, experts recommend taking proactive steps:
• Opt out of the memory feature or regularly delete saved data.
• Use incognito mode for sensitive browsing.
• Review data-sharing and model-training permissions before enabling them.
AI browsers like ChatGPT Atlas may redefine digital interaction, but they also test the boundaries of data ethics and security. As this technology evolves, maintaining user trust will depend on transparency, accountability, and strict privacy protection.
Hong Kong, China — A recent cyberattack on Hongkong Post’s online mailing system has resulted in a major data breach affecting tens of thousands of users. According to officials, the hacker managed to access sensitive contact information from the EC-Ship platform, which is widely used for managing and sending mail.
Postmaster General Leonia Tai revealed that the attacker was able to view information stored in the address books of approximately 60,000 to 70,000 EC-Ship accounts. These records contained the names, addresses, email IDs, and phone numbers of both senders and recipients, as well as company names and fax numbers.
EC-Ship is a digital tool operated by the Hongkong Post, which helps individuals and businesses arrange mail deliveries locally and internationally. The platform allows users to save contact information, print shipping labels, and track parcels.
The breach began on Sunday night and continued into Monday. According to Tai, the attacker created a legitimate account on the platform and began exploring weaknesses in the system’s code. Though the system recognized unusual activity and temporarily suspended the attacker’s access, the hacker continued trying different techniques. Eventually, they discovered a flaw in the program’s code that allowed them to reach data stored in other users’ address books.
Tai stated that the issue was quickly identified and the affected programming code was patched to block further intrusions. However, the hacker had already extracted confidential information from a large number of users. The Hongkong Post has contacted affected account holders by email and asked them to alert anyone whose information may have been exposed.
Law enforcement agencies have launched an investigation into the incident. In the meantime, Hongkong Post is seeking expert advice to strengthen its digital defences.
Cybersecurity professionals have raised concerns over where the EC-Ship system is hosted. Some believe that sensitive systems like this should operate on government cloud servers, which offer more advanced protection. Tai responded that Hongkong Post follows standard security procedures and that their internal systems did detect and respond to the attack.
Efforts are now underway to migrate the EC-Ship service to a central government-managed internet platform that uses multiple layers of protection and round-the-clock monitoring. Officials hope this will reduce the chances of future incidents and better safeguard users’ data.
The digital advertising world is changing rapidly due to privacy concerns and regulatory needs, and the shift is affecting how advertisers target customers. Starting in 2025, Google to stop using third-party cookies in the world’s most popular browser, Chrome. The cookies are data files that track our internet activities in our browsers. The cookie collects information sold to advertisers, who use this for targeted advertising based on user data.
“Cookies are files created by websites you visit. By saving information about your visit, they make your online experience easier. For example, sites can keep you signed in, remember your site preferences, and give you locally relevant content,” says Google.
In 2019 and 2020, Firefox and Safari took a step back from third-party cookies. Following their footsteps, Google’s Chrome allows users to opt out of the settings. As the cookies have information that can identify a user, the EU’s and UK’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) asks a user for prior consent via spamming pop-ups.
Once the spine of targeted digital advertising, the future of third-party cookies doesn’t look bright. However, not everything is sunshine and rainbows.
While giants like Amazon, Google, and Facebook are burning bridges by blocking third-party cookies to address privacy concerns, they can still collect first-party data about a user from their websites, and the data will be sold to advertisers if a user permits, however in a less intrusive form. The harvested data won’t be of much use to the advertisers, but the annoying pop-ups being in existence may irritate the users.
One way consumers and companies can benefit is by adapting the advertising industry to be more efficient. Instead of using targeted advertising, companies can directly engage with customers visiting websites.
Advances in AI and machine learning can also help. Instead of invasive ads that keep following you on the internet, the user will be getting information and features personally. Companies can predict user needs, and via techniques like automated delivery and pre-emptive stocking, give better results. A new advertising landscape is on its way.