Instagram has firmly denied claims of a new data breach following reports that personal details linked to more than 17 million accounts are being shared across online forums. The company stated that its internal systems were not compromised and that user accounts remain secure.
The clarification comes after concerns emerged around a technical flaw that allowed unknown actors to repeatedly trigger password reset emails for Instagram users. Meta, Instagram’s parent company, confirmed that this issue has been fixed. According to the company, the flaw did not provide access to accounts or expose passwords. Users who received unexpected reset emails were advised to ignore them, as no action is required.
Public attention intensified after cybersecurity alerts suggested that a large dataset allegedly connected to Instagram accounts had been released online. The data, which was reportedly shared without charge on several hacking forums, was claimed to have been collected through an unverified Instagram API vulnerability dating back to 2024.
The dataset is said to include information from over 17 million profiles. The exposed details reportedly vary by record and include usernames, internal account IDs, names, email addresses, phone numbers, and, in some cases, physical addresses. Analysis of the data shows that not all records contain complete personal details, with some entries listing only basic identifiers such as a username and account ID.
Researchers discussing the incident on social media platforms have suggested that the data may not be recent. Some claim it could originate from an older scraping incident, possibly dating back to 2022. However, no technical evidence has been publicly provided to support these claims. Meta has also stated that it has no record of Instagram API breaches occurring in either 2022 or 2024.
Instagram has previously dealt with scraping-related incidents. In one earlier case, a vulnerability allowed attackers to collect and sell personal information associated with millions of accounts. Due to this history, cybersecurity experts believe the newly surfaced dataset could be a collection of older information gathered from multiple sources over several years, rather than the result of a newly discovered vulnerability.
Attempts to verify the origin of the data have so far been unsuccessful. The individual responsible for releasing the dataset did not respond to requests seeking clarification on when or how the information was obtained.
At present, there is no confirmation that this situation represents a new breach of Instagram’s systems. No evidence has been provided to demonstrate that the data was extracted through a recently exploited flaw, and Meta maintains that there has been no unauthorized access to its infrastructure.
While passwords are not included in the leaked information, users are still urged to remain cautious. Such datasets are often used in phishing emails, scam messages, and social engineering attacks designed to trick individuals into revealing additional information.
Users who receive password reset emails or login codes they did not request should delete them and take no further action. Enabling two-factor authentication is fiercely recommended, as it provides an added layer of security against unauthorized access attempts.
Trust Wallets in a post on X said, “We’ve identified a security incident affecting Trust Wallet Browser Extension version 2.68 only. Users with Browser Extension 2.68 should disable and upgrade to 2.69.”
CZ has assured that the company is investigating how threat actors were able to compromise the new version.
Mobile-only users and browser extension versions are not impacted. User funds are SAFE,” Zhao wrote in a post on X.
The compromise happened because of a flaw in a version of the Trust Wallet Google Chrome browser extension.
If you suffered the compromise of Browser Extension v2.68, follow these steps on Trust Wallet X site:
Please wait to open the Browser Extension until you have updated to Extension version 2.69. This helps safeguard the security of your wallet and avoids possible problems.
Social media users expressed their views. One said, “The problem has been going on for several hours,” while another user complained that the company ”must explain what happened and compensate all users affected. Otherwise reputation is tarnished.” A user also asked, “How did the vulnerability in version 2.68 get past testing, and what changes are being made to prevent similar issues?”
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has disclosed that it was affected by a data security incident involving a third-party contractor, after improper access to an internal system raised concerns about the handling of sensitive public information. The agency became aware of the issue in mid-December, although the activity itself is believed to have occurred earlier.
According to internal communications from the EEOC’s data security office, the incident involved the agency’s Public Portal system, which is used by individuals to submit information and records directly to the commission. Employees working for a contracted service provider were granted elevated system permissions to perform their duties. However, the agency later determined that this access was used in ways that violated security rules and internal policies.
Once the unauthorized activity was identified, the EEOC stated that it acted immediately to protect its systems and launched a detailed review to assess what data may have been affected. That assessment found that some personally identifiable information could have been exposed. This type of information can include a person’s name as well as other identifying or contact details, depending on the specific record submitted. The agency emphasized that the review process is still underway and that law enforcement authorities are involved in the investigation.
To reduce potential risk to affected individuals, the EEOC advised users to closely monitor their financial accounts for unusual activity. As an additional security step, users of the Public Portal are also being required to reset their passwords.
Public contracting records show that the system involved was supported by a private company that provides case management software to federal agencies. A spokesperson for the company confirmed its role and stated that both the contractor and the EEOC responded promptly after learning of the issue. The spokesperson said the company continues to cooperate with investigators and law enforcement, noting that the individuals involved are facing active legal proceedings in federal court in Virginia.
The company acknowledged that the employees had passed background checks in place at the time of hiring, which covered a seven-year period and met existing government standards. However, the incident highlighted gaps in relying solely on screening measures. In response, the company said it has strengthened oversight by extending background checks where legally permitted, increasing compliance training, and tightening internal controls related to hiring and employee exits. Those responsible for the hiring decisions are no longer employed by the firm.
The EEOC stated that protecting sensitive data remains a priority but declined to provide further details while the investigation continues. Relevant congressional oversight committees have also been contacted regarding the matter.
The disclosure comes amid increased public attention on the EEOC’s role in addressing workplace discrimination, particularly as diversity and inclusion programs face scrutiny across government agencies and private organizations. Recent public outreach efforts by agency leadership have further placed the commission in the spotlight.
More broadly, the incident underlines an ongoing cybersecurity concern across government systems: the risk posed by insider access through contractors. When third-party personnel are given long-term or privileged access, even trusted environments can become vulnerable without continuous monitoring and strict controls.
A large collection of data reportedly taken from Spotify has surfaced online, drawing attention to serious issues around copyright protection, digital security, and large-scale data misuse. The dataset, which is estimated to be close to 300 terabytes in size, is already being distributed through public torrent networks.
The claim comes from Anna’s Archive, a group previously known for archiving books and academic research. According to information shared by the group, it collected metadata for roughly 256 million tracks and audio files for about 86 million songs from Spotify. Anna’s Archive alleges that this archive represents nearly all listening activity on the platform, estimating coverage at around 99.6 percent.
Anna’s Archive has framed the project as a cultural preservation effort. The group argues that while mainstream music is often stored in multiple locations, lesser-known songs are vulnerable to disappearing if streaming platforms remove content, lose licensing agreements, or shut down services. From this perspective, Spotify was described as a practical starting point for documenting modern music history.
The archive is reportedly organised by popularity and shared through bulk torrent files. Anna’s Archive claims that the total size of the collection makes it one of the largest publicly accessible music metadata databases ever assembled.
Details released by the group suggest that highly streamed tracks were stored in their original 160 kbps format, while less popular songs were compressed into smaller files to reduce storage demands. Music released after July 2025 may not be included. At present, full access is limited to metadata, with audio files being released gradually, beginning with the most popular tracks.
Spotify has since issued an updated statement addressing the situation. The company confirmed it identified and disabled the user accounts involved in what it described as unlawful scraping activity. Spotify said it has introduced additional safeguards to prevent similar incidents and is actively monitoring for suspicious behaviour.
The company reiterated its long-standing position against piracy, stating that it works closely with industry partners to protect artists and copyright holders. In an earlier clarification, Spotify explained that the incident did not involve a direct breach of its internal systems. Instead, it said a third party collected public metadata and used illicit methods to bypass digital rights protections in order to access some audio files.
Spotify has not confirmed the scale of the data collection claimed by Anna’s Archive. While the group asserts that almost the entire platform was archived, Spotify has only acknowledged that a portion of its audio content may have been affected.
At this stage, it remains unclear how much of Spotify’s library was actually accessed or whether legal action will be taken to remove the data from torrent networks. Copyright experts note that redistributing licensed music without permission violates copyright laws in many jurisdictions, regardless of whether it is presented as preservation.
Whether the archive can be effectively taken down or contained remains uncertain.
It was orchestrated by the Clop ransomware group, a highly motivated cybercriminal syndicate that was well known for extorting large sums of money from their victims. During the attack, nearly 3.5 million individuals' personal records, such as those belonging to students, faculty, administrative staff, and third-party suppliers, were compromised, resulting in the compromise of the records.
Established in 1976, the university has grown over the last five decades into a major national educational provider. The university has enrolled approximately 82,700 students and is supported by a workforce of 3,400 employees.
Of these, nearly 2,300 are academics. This breach was officially confirmed by the institution through a written statement posted on its website on early December, while Phoenix Education Partners' parent organization, which filed a mandatory 8-K filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, formally notified federal regulators of the incident in early December.
In this disclosure, the first authoritative acknowledgment of a breach that experts claim may have profound implications for identity protection, financial security, and institutional accountability within the higher education sector has been made. There is a substantial risk associated with critical enterprise software and delayed threat detection, highlighting how extensive the risks can be.
The breach at the University of Phoenix highlights this fact. The internal incident briefing indicates that the intrusion took place over a period of nine days between August 13 and August 22, 2025. The attackers took advantage of an unreported vulnerability in Oracle's E-Business Suite (EBS) - an important financial and administrative platform widely used by large organizations - to exploit the vulnerability.
During the course of this vulnerability, the threat actors were able to gain unauthorized access to highly sensitive information, which they then exfiltrated to 3,489,274 individuals, including students, alumni, students and professors, as well as external suppliers and service providers. The university did not find out about the compromise until November 21, 2025, more than three months after it occurred, even though it had begun unfolding in August.
According to reports, the discovery coincided with public signals from the Cl0p ransomware group, which had listed the institution on its leaked site, which had triggered its public detection. It has been reported that Phoenix Education Partners, the parent company of the university, formally disclosed the incident in a regulatory Form 8-K filing submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on December 2, 2025, followed by a broader public notification effort initiated on December 22 and 23 of the same year.
It is not unusual for sophisticated cyber intrusions to be detected in advance, but this delayed detection caused significant complications in the institution's response efforts because the institution's focus shifted from immediate containment to ensuring regulatory compliance, managing reputational risks, and ensuring identity protection for millions of people affected.
A comprehensive identity protection plan has been implemented by the University of Phoenix in response to the breach. This program offers a 12-month credit monitoring service, dark web surveillance service, identity theft recovery assistance, and an identity theft reimbursement policy that covers up to $1 million for those who have been affected by the breach.
The institution has not formally admitted liability for the incident, but there is strong evidence that it is part of a larger extortion campaign by the Clop ransomware group to take over the institution. A security analyst indicates Clop took advantage of a zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle's E-Business Suite in early August 2025, and that it has also been exploited in similar fashion to steal sensitive data from other prominent U.S universities, including Harvard University and the University of Pennsylvania, in both of whom confirmed that their students' and staff's personal records were accessed by an unauthorized third party using compromised Oracle systems.
The clone has a proven history of orchestrating mass data theft, including targeting various file transfer platforms, such as GoAnywhere, Accellion FTA, MOVEit, Cleo, and Gladinet CentreStack, as well as MFT platforms such as GoAnywhere. The Department of State has announced that a reward of up to $10 million will be offered to anyone who can identify a foreign government as the source of the ransomware collective's operations.
The resulting disruption has caused a number of disruptions in the business environment. In addition to the wave of incidents, other higher-education institutions have also been victimized by cyberattacks, which is a troubling pattern.
As a result of breaches involving voice phishing, some universities have revealed that their development, alumni, and administrative systems have been accessed unauthorized and donor and community information has been exfiltrated. Furthermore, this incident is similar to other recent instances of Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS) compromises across U.S. universities that have been reported.
These include Harvard University and the University of Pennsylvania, both of whom have admitted that unauthorized access was accessed to systems used to manage sensitive student and staff data. Among cybersecurity leaders, leadership notes the fact that universities are increasingly emulating the risk profile associated with sectors such as healthcare, characterized by centralized ecosystems housing large amounts of long-term personal data.
In a world where studies of student enrolment, financial aid records, payroll infrastructure and donor databases are all kept in the same place, a single point of compromise can reveal years and even decades of accumulated personal and financial information, compromising the unique culture of the institution.
Having large and long-standing repositories makes colleges unique targets for hacker attacks due to their scale and longevity, and because the impact of a breach of these repositories will be measured not only in terms of the loss of records, but in terms of the length of exposure as well as the size of the population exposed.
With this breach at University of Phoenix, an increasing body of evidence has emerged that U.S colleges and universities are constantly being victimized by an ever more coordinated wave of cyberattacks. There are recent disclosures from leading academic institutions, including Harvard University, the University of Pennsylvania, and Princeton University, that show that the threat landscape goes beyond ransomware operations, with voice-phishing campaigns also being used as a means to infiltrate systems that serve to facilitate alumni engagement and donor information sharing.
Among the many concerns raised by the developments, there are also concerns over the protection of institutional privacy. During an unusual public outrage, the U.S. Department of State has offered an unusual reward of $10 million for information that could link Clop's activities to foreign governments. This was a result of growing concerns within federal agencies that the ransomware groups may, in some cases, intersect with broader geopolitical strategies through their financial motivations.
University administrators and administrators have been reminded of the structural vulnerability associated with modern higher education because it highlights a reliance on sprawling, interconnected enterprise platforms that centralize academic, administrative, and financial operations, which creates an environment where the effects of a single breach can cascade across multiple stakeholder groups.
There has been a remarkable shift in attackers' priorities away from downright disrupting systems to covertly extracting and eradicating data. As a result, cybersecurity experts warn that breaches involving the theft of millions of records may no longer be outliers, but a foreseeable and recurring concern.
University institutions face two significant challenges that can be attributed to this trend-intensified regulatory scrutiny as well as the more intangible challenge of preserving trust among students, faculty, and staff whose personal information institutions are bound to protect ethically and contractually.
In light of the breach, the higher-education sector is experiencing a pivotal moment that is reinforcing the need for universities to evolve from open knowledge ecosystems to fortified digital enterprises, reinforcing concerns.
The use of identity protection support may be helpful in alleviating downstream damage, but cybersecurity experts are of the opinion that long-term resilience requires structural reform, rather than episodic responses.
The field of information security is moving towards layered defenses for legacy platforms, quicker patch cycles for vulnerabilities, and continuous network monitoring that is capable of identifying anomalous access patterns in real time, which is a key part of the process.
During crisis periods, it is important for policy analysts to emphasize the importance of institutional transparency, emphasizing the fact that early communication combined with clear remediation roadmaps provides a good opportunity to limit misinformation and recover stakeholder confidence.
In addition to technical safeguards, industry leaders advocate for expanded security awareness programs to improve institutional perimeters even as advanced tools are still being used to deal with threats like social engineering and phishing.
In this time of unprecedented digital access, in which data has become as valuable as degrees, universities face the challenge of safeguarding information, which is no longer a supplemental responsibility but a fundamental institutional mandate that will help determine the credibility, compliance, and trust that universities will rely on in years to come.