Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Showing posts with label Data Brokers. Show all posts

National Security at Risk: The CFPB’s Battle Against Data Brokers

The CFPB’s Battle Against Data Brokers

Data brokers work in secrecy, collecting personal details about our lives. These entities collect, and misuse our personal information without our explicit consent. 

The Rise of Data Brokers

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has taken notice, and their proposed regulations seek to hold data brokers accountable by subjecting them to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). This move transcends mere privacy concerns—it is a matter of national security.

For instance, data brokers can facilitate targeting individuals by allowing entities to purchase lists that match multiple categories, such as “Intelligence and Counterterrorism” combined with descriptors like “substance abuse,” “heavy drinker,” or even “behind on bills.” 

In other contexts, entities can buy records for pennies per person, leveraging relatively small investments into mass data collection. The concern is that adversaries, including countries like China, can use this data to identify targets for surveillance and other purposes. The government is increasingly worried about foreign governments’ access to Americans’ data.

The CFPB’s Call to Action

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau intends to propose new regulations that will compel data brokers to follow the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Earlier this month, CFPB Director Rohit Chopra stated that the agency is looking into rules to "ensure greater accountability" for companies that buy and sell consumer data, in line with an executive order signed by President Joe Biden in late February.

Chopra added that the agency is examining suggestions that would classify data brokers who sell specific categories of data as "consumer reporting agencies," requiring them to comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). The statute prohibits the sharing of certain types of data with companies unless they have a legally defined purpose.

The CFBP considers the purchase and sale of consumer data to be a national security issue rather than a privacy concern. Chopra cited three large data breaches—the 2015 Anthem leak, the 2017 Equifax hack, and the 2018 Marriott breach—as instances of foreign enemies illegally collecting Americans' personal information.  

The National Security Angle

He said, "When Americans' health information, financial information, and even their travel whereabouts can be assembled into detailed dossiers, it's no surprise that this raises risks when it comes to safety and security,". However, the attention on high-profile intrusions hides a more widespread, entirely legal phenomenon: data brokers' capacity to sell precise personal information to anyone willing to pay for it. 

The government is increasingly concerned about foreign governments gaining access to Americans' data. In March, the House passed legislation that would bar data brokers from selling Americans' personally identifiable information to "any entity controlled by a foreign adversary." 

Why Data Brokers Matter

According to the Protecting Americans' Data from Foreign Adversaries Act, data brokers would be facing fines from the Federal Trade Commission if they sold sensitive information — such as location or health data — to any person or business situated in a few countries. The Senate has yet to vote on the legislation.

US government agencies also depend on data brokers to keep surveillance on Americans. In 2022, the American Civil Liberties Union released a series of files exposing how the DHS (Department of Homeland Security) exploited location data to track the movement of millions of cell phones — and the users who own them — across the United States.

Data Brokers are Preparing to Challenge Privacy Legislation

 

Congress has been attempting to crack down on data brokers, and they are fighting back. In late March, the House voted unanimously to ban the sale of Americans' data to foreign rivals. And a data-collecting provision is included in the bill reauthorizing Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), the contentious act that authorises the National Security Agency, which is set to expire later this month. 

Negotiations over FISA's reauthorization became so heated that House Speaker Mike Johnson pulled the bill from consideration in February. The most contentious issue was an amendment proposed by Rep. Warren Davidson (R-OH) that would bar data brokers from selling customer data to law enforcement and require a warrant to access Americans' information, according to Politico's Influence newsletter in February. 

National security hawks in Congress and local law enforcement groups joined forces to oppose the amendment, with the National Sheriffs' Association alleging in a letter to Congress that it would "kneecap law enforcement". 

"On House amendments, the Sheriffs of this great country don't usually keep score. But on this one, we will keep score and know who our friends are by their votes against Congressman Davidson's amendment, which further erodes the rule of law in our country and empowers the cartels," the letter stated. 

With FISA about to expire at the end of the month, Congress will undoubtedly bring it up again. Some legislators have indicated that they are unlikely to support the bill unless privacy updates are included. "We must have these amendments. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), leader of the House Judiciary Committee, told Politico in February that "there's no way we're not going to have them.” 

Data brokers also seem to be entering the fight. Politico's Influence newsletter revealed that early this year, when the amendment was being discussed in the House, Relx, the parent company of data analytics company LexisNexis, based in the United Kingdom, hired the lobbying firm Venable. 

Recently, criticism of other Relx subsidiaries' data collecting and distribution policies has also surfaced. The New York Times revealed in March that a number of automakers were providing LexisNexis Risk Solutions with driving records of their clients, who then sold the data to insurance firms.

Data Broker Tracked Visitors to Jeffrey Epstein’s Island, New Report Reveals

 

The saga surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender with ties to numerous wealthy and influential figures, continues to unfold with alarming revelations surfacing about the extent of privacy intrusion. Among the latest reports is the shocking revelation that a data broker actively tracked visitors to Epstein’s private island, Little Saint James, leveraging their mobile data to monitor their movements. This discovery has ignited a firestorm of controversy and renewed concerns about privacy rights and the unchecked power of data brokers. 

For years, Epstein's island remained shrouded in secrecy, known only to a select few within his inner circle. However, recent investigations have shed light on the island's dark activities and the prominent individuals who frequented its shores. Now, the emergence of evidence suggesting that a data broker exploited mobile data to monitor visits to the island has cast a disturbing spotlight on the invasive tactics employed by third-party entities. 

The implications of this revelation are profound and far-reaching. It raises serious questions about the ethical boundaries of data collection and surveillance in the digital age. While the practice of tracking mobile data is not new, its use in monitoring individuals' visits to sensitive and controversial locations like Epstein’s island underscores the need for greater transparency and accountability in the data brokerage industry. 

At its core, the issue revolves around the fundamental right to privacy and the protection of personal data. In an era where our every move is tracked and recorded, often without our knowledge or consent, the need for robust data protection regulations has never been more pressing. Without adequate safeguards in place, individuals are vulnerable to exploitation and manipulation by unscrupulous actors seeking to profit from their private information. 

Moreover, the revelation highlights the broader societal implications of unchecked data surveillance. It serves as a stark reminder of the power wielded by data brokers and the potential consequences of their actions on individuals' lives. From wealthy elites to everyday citizens, no one is immune to the pervasive reach of data tracking and monitoring. 

In response to these revelations, there is a growing call for increased transparency and accountability in the data brokerage industry. Individuals must be empowered with greater control over their personal data, including the ability to opt-out of invasive tracking practices. Additionally, regulators must step up enforcement efforts to hold data brokers accountable for any violations of privacy rights. 

As the investigation into the tracking of visitors to Epstein’s island continues, it serves as a sobering reminder of the urgent need to address the growing threats posed by unchecked data surveillance. Only through concerted action and meaningful reforms can we safeguard individuals' privacy rights and ensure a more ethical and responsible approach to data collection and usage in the digital age.

General Motors Ceases Sharing Driver Behavior Data with Data Brokers

 


General Motors announced on Friday that it ceased sharing information on driving habits of its customers with two data brokers involved in creating risk assessments for insurance companies.

This decision came in response to a recent report by The New York Times revealing that General Motors had been sharing data on mileage, braking, acceleration, and speed of drivers with the insurance industry for several years. These data were collected through the OnStar Smart Driver feature in General Motors' internet-connected cars, often without the drivers' knowledge. This feature gathered driving data and offered feedback and digital rewards for safe driving.

Some drivers reported that their insurance premiums increased due to the shared data, which General Motors provided to two brokers, LexisNexis Risk Solutions and Verisk, who then sold it to insurance firms.

A spokesperson for General Motors, Malorie Lucich, stated via email that since Wednesday, they have halted the sharing of OnStar Smart Driver customer data with LexisNexis or Verisk. Lucich emphasized the company's commitment to customer trust and stated that they are actively reviewing their privacy procedures and policies.

In response to the situation, Romeo Chicco from Florida, whose insurance rates nearly doubled after his Cadillac's driving data was collected, filed a complaint seeking class-action status against General Motors, OnStar, and LexisNexis.

An internal document, examined by The New York Times, indicated that as of 2022, over eight million vehicles were enrolled in the Smart Driver program. A company insider revealed that the program's annual revenue was in the low millions of dollars.

How to Protect Your Personal Financial Information from Data Brokers


In today’s digital age, personal information is a hot commodity. Data brokers buy and sell this information, often without our knowledge or consent. This can include sensitive financial information, which can be used for identity theft or other fraudulent activities.

Fortunately, there are steps you can take to protect your personal financial information from data brokers. 

Here are some tips to help you fight back:

1. Monitor your credit reports: Regularly check your credit reports from the three major credit bureaus (Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion) to ensure that there are no unauthorized accounts or inquiries. If you find any suspicious activity, report it immediately.

2. Freeze your credit: Consider placing a security freeze on your credit reports. This will prevent anyone from accessing your credit report without your permission, making it more difficult for identity thieves to open new accounts in your name.

3. Opt-out of data sharing: Many companies share your personal information with third parties for marketing purposes. You can opt-out of this by contacting the company directly and requesting that they stop sharing your information.

4. Use strong passwords: Use strong, unique passwords for all of your online accounts and enable two-factor authentication whenever possible. This will make it more difficult for hackers to access your accounts and steal your personal information.

5. Be cautious when sharing personal information: Be cautious when sharing personal information online or over the phone. Only provide this information when it is absolutely necessary and when you are sure that the person or company requesting it is legitimate.

Protecting your personal financial information from data brokers is important for preventing identity theft and other fraudulent activities. 

By following these tips, you can take control of your personal information and keep it safe from prying eyes.