TikTok’s lead regulator in Europe, Ireland’s Data Protection Commission (DPC) said that TikTok accepted during the probe about hosting European user data in China. DPC’s deputy commissioner Graham Doyle said that “TikTok failed to verify, guarantee, and demonstrate that the personal data of (European) users, remotely accessed by staff in China, was afforded a level of protection essentially equivalent to that guaranteed within the EU,”
Besides this, Doyle said that TikTok’s failure to address the dangers of possible access to Europeans’s private data by Chinese authorities under China’s anti-terrorism, counter-espionage, and other regulations, which TikTok itself found different than EU’s data protection standards.
TikTok has declared to contest the heavy EU fine, despite the findings. TikTok Europe’s Christine Grahn stressed that the company has “never received a request” from authorities in China for European users’ data and that “TikTok” has never given EU users’ data to Chinese authorities. “We disagree with this decision and intend to appeal it in full,” Christine said.
TikTok boasts a massive 1.5 billion users worldwide. In recent years, the social media platform has been under tough pressure from Western governments due to worries about the misuse of data by Chinese actors for surveillance and propaganda aims.
In 2023, the Ireland DPC fined TikTok 354 million euros for violating EU rules related to the processing of children’s information. The DPC’s recent judgment also revealed that TikTok violated requirements under the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) by sending user data to China. The decision includes a 530 million euro administrative penalty plus a mandate that TikTok aligns its data processing rules with EU practices within 6 months.
In the last few years since the war in Ukraine began, several European countries have experienced unusual and suspicious activities. These events include online attacks, spying, fires, and efforts to spread false information. Investigations suggest that many of these actions may be linked to Russia or groups working in its interest.
According to a report studied by journalists from a global news agency, at least 59 such incidents have taken place. These actions are believed to be part of a broader strategy known as "hybrid attacks" which mix cybercrime, sabotage, and misinformation to confuse or harm other countries without direct warfare.
Some of these incidents involved hackers breaking into politicians' accounts or important systems. In other cases, there were attempts to cause damage through arson or even plans to smuggle explosives onto cargo flights. These activities have raised serious concerns among security agencies.
Officials from NATO believe these attacks serve two purposes: to create political tension within countries and to reduce international support for Ukraine. Nations that have supported Ukraine the most— like Poland, Finland, Estonia, and Latvia—have been targeted more often.
In the Baltic Sea, mysterious shipping activity has raised suspicions of Russian involvement in damaging undersea cables and pipelines. On land, authorities in some countries have accused Russia and its close ally Belarus of creating border tensions by pushing migrants toward their borders. Fires in Lithuania and Poland have also been publicly connected to these efforts.
When asked for a response, Russian officials denied all the accusations and claimed there was no solid proof of their involvement.
In a separate investigation, journalists from a European media alliance managed to secretly join an online group linked to Russian hackers. The journalist, after gaining the group's trust, was asked to perform tasks such as putting anti-West stickers in European cities and gathering personal data about people and groups.
This group was also linked to cyberattacks targeting vital infrastructure in European and NATO member countries. They appear to be part of a growing number of hacker collectives that act on behalf of Russian interests.
A European Union representative described these operations as an invisible form of war that is becoming more common across the continent— not just in countries near Russia.
Security experts say Russian intelligence may be hiring short-term agents through online channels to carry out small-scale missions. Because these people work anonymously and are hard to trace, it's difficult to hold anyone directly responsible.
According to the Czech foreign minister, there have been around 500 suspicious cases across Europe. Of these, about 100 have been officially blamed on Russia. He added that such attacks are happening more frequently now.
Poland’s space agency, POLSA, has reported a cyberattack on its systems, prompting an ongoing investigation. In response to the breach, the agency quickly disconnected its network from the internet to prevent further damage. As of Monday, its official website was still offline.
Government and Cybersecurity Teams Take Action
Poland’s Minister of Digital Affairs, Krzysztof Gawkowski, confirmed that cybersecurity experts detected unauthorized access to POLSA’s systems. Security specialists have since secured the affected infrastructure and are now working to determine who was behind the attack. However, officials have not yet shared whether the hackers were financially motivated cybercriminals or politically driven groups. The method used to infiltrate the agency’s network also remains undisclosed.
Why Hackers Target Space Agencies
Organizations involved in space research and technology are often appealing targets for cybercriminals. Many of these agencies collaborate with defense and intelligence sectors, making them vulnerable to attacks that could expose confidential projects, satellite communications, and security-related data. A cyberattack on such an agency could disrupt critical operations, leak classified research, or even interfere with national security.
Poland Faces a Surge in Cyberattacks
Poland has become one of the most frequently targeted countries in the European Union when it comes to cyber threats. Earlier this year, Gawkowski stated that the country experiences more cyber incidents than any other EU nation, with most attacks believed to be linked to Russian actors. Poland’s strong support for Ukraine, both in military assistance and humanitarian aid, has likely contributed to this rise in cyber threats.
The number of cyberattacks against Poland has increased drastically in recent years. Reports indicate that attacks doubled in 2023 compared to previous years, with over 400,000 cybersecurity incidents recorded in just the first half of the year. In response, the Polish government introduced a cybersecurity initiative in June, allocating $760 million to strengthen the country’s digital defenses.
Other Space Agencies Have Also Been Targeted
This is not the first time a space agency has fallen victim to cyberattacks. Japan’s space agency, JAXA, has faced multiple breaches in the past. In 2016, reports suggested that JAXA was among 200 Japanese organizations targeted by suspected Chinese military hackers. In 2023, unknown attackers infiltrated the agency’s network, raising concerns that sensitive communications with private companies, such as Toyota, may have been exposed.
As space technology continues to advance, protecting space agencies from cyber threats has become more crucial than ever. These organizations handle valuable and often classified information, making them prime targets for espionage, sabotage, and financial cybercrime. If hackers manage to breach their systems, the consequences could be severe, ranging from stolen research data to disruptions in satellite operations and defense communications.
POLSA’s ongoing investigation will likely uncover more details about the cyberattack in the coming weeks. For now, the incident highlights the increasing need for governments and space organizations to invest in stronger cybersecurity measures to protect critical infrastructure.
Google is currently being investigated in Europe over privacy concerns raised about how the search giant has used personal data to train its generative AI tools. The subject of investigation is led by Ireland's Data Protection Commission, which ensures that the giant technical company adheres to strict data protection laws within the European Union. This paper will establish whether Google adhered to its legal process, such as obtaining a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA), before using people's private information to develop its intelligent machine models.
Data Collection for AI Training Causes Concerns
Generative AI technologies similar to Google's brand Gemini have emerged into the headlines because these tend to create fake information and leak personal information. This raises the question of whether Google's AI training methods, necessarily involving tremendous amounts of data through which such training must pass, are GDPR-compliant-its measures to protect privacy and rights regarding individuals when such data is used for developing AI.
This issue at the heart of the probe is if Google should have carried out a DPIA, which is an acronym for Data Protection Impact Assessment-the view of any risks data processing activities may have on the rights to privacy of individuals. The reason for conducting a DPIA is to ensure that the rights of the individuals are protected simply because companies like Google process humongous personal data so as to create such AI models. The investigation, however, is specifically focused on how Google has been using its model called PaLM2 for running different forms of AI, such as chatbots and enhancements in the search mechanism.
Fines Over Privacy Breaches
But if the DPC finds that Google did not comply with the GDPR, then this could pose a very serious threat to the company because the fine may amount to more than 4% of the annual revenue generated globally. Such a company as Google can raise billions of dollars in revenue every year; hence such can result in a tremendous amount.
Other tech companies, including OpenAI and Meta, also received similar privacy-based questions relating to their data practices when developing AI.
Other general issues revolve around the processing of personal data in this fast-emerging sphere of artificial intelligence.
Google Response to Investigation
The firm has so far refused to answer questions over specific sources of data used to train its generative AI tools. A company spokesperson said Google remains dedicated to compliance with the GDPR and will continue cooperating with the DPC throughout the course of the investigation. The company maintains it has done nothing illegal. And just because a company is under investigation, that doesn't mean there's something wrong with it; the very act of inquiring itself forms part of a broader effort to ensure that companies using technology take account of how personal information is being used.
Data Protection in the AI Era
DPC questioning of Google is part of a broader effort by the EU regulators to ensure generative AI technologies adhere to the bloc's high data-privacy standards. As concerns over how personal information is used, more companies are injecting AI into their operations. The GDPR has been among the most important tools for ensuring citizens' protection against misuse of data, especially during cases involving sensitive or personal data.
In the last few years, other tech companies have been prosecuted with regard to their data-related activities in AI development. Recently, the developers of ChatGPT, OpenAI, and Elon Musk's X (formerly Twitter), faced investigations and complaints under the law of GDPR. This indicates the growing pressure technological advancement and the seriousness in the protection of privacy are under.
The Future of AI and Data Privacy
In developing AI technologies, firms developing relevant technology need to strike a balance between innovation and privacy. The more innovation has brought numerous benefits into the world-search capabilities and more efficient processes-the more it has opened risks to light by leaving personal data not so carefully dealt with in most cases.
Moving forward, the regulators, including the DPC, would be tracking the manner in which the companies like Google are dealing with the data. It is sure to make rules much more well-defined on what is permissible usage of personal information for developing the AI that would better protect individuals' rights and freedoms in this digital age.
Ultimately, the consequences of this study may eventually shape how AI technologies are designed and implemented in the European Union; it will certainly inform tech businesses around the world.