Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

About Me

Showing posts with label Dark Web. Show all posts

Undercover Operation Shuts Down Website Helping Hackers Internationally


Hackers used AVCheck to see malware efficiency

International police action has shut down AVCheck, an anti-virus scanning website used by threat actors to check whether their malware was detected by mainstream antivirus before using it in the attacks. The official domain “avcheck.net” now shows a seizure banner with the logos of the U.S. Secret Service, the U.S. Department of Justice, the FBI, and the Dutch Police (Politie).  

The site was used globally by threat actors

According to the announcement, AVCheck was a famous counter antivirus (CAV) website globally that enabled hackers to check the efficiency of their malware. Politie’s Matthijs Jaspers said, “Taking the AVCheck service offline marks an important step in tackling organized cybercrime." With the collaborative effort, the agencies have disrupted the “cybercriminals as early as possible in their operations and prevent victims." 

The officials also discovered evidence linking AVCheck’s administrators to encrypting services Cryptor.biz  (seized) and Crypt.guru (currently offline). Crypting services allow threat actors to hide their payloads from antivirus, blending them in the ecosystem. Hackers also use a crypting service to hide their malware, check it on AVCheck or other CAV services to see if is detected, and finally launch it against their targets. 

Details about the operation

Before the shutdown of AVCheck, the police made a fake login page warning users of the legal risks when they log in to such sites. The FBI said that “cybercriminals don't just create malware; they perfect it for maximum destruction.” Special Agent Douglas Williams said threat actors leverage antivirus services to “refine their weapons against the world's toughest security systems to better slip past firewalls, evade forensic analysis, and wreak havoc across victims' systems."

Operation Endgame

The undercover agents exposed the illegal nature of AVCheck and its links to ransomware attacks against the U.S. by purchasing these services as clients. According to the U.S. DoJ, in the “affidavit filed in support of these seizures, authorities made undercover purchases from seized websites and analyzed the services, confirming they were designed for cybercrime.”

The crackdown was part of Operation Endgame, a joint international law enforcement action that captured 300 servers and 650 domains used in assisting ransomware attacks. Earlier, the operation cracked down on the infamous Danabot and Smokeloader malware operations.

FBI Cracks Down on Dark Web Drug Dealers

 


A major criminal network operating on the dark web has been disrupted in a large international operation led by the FBI. Over 270 individuals have been arrested for their involvement in the online trade of dangerous illegal drugs such as fentanyl, meth, and cocaine. This operation involved law enforcement teams from the United States, Europe, South America, and Asia.


What is the dark web?

The dark web is a hidden part of the internet that isn’t available through standard search engines or browsers. It requires special tools to access and is often used to hide users’ identities. While it can offer privacy to those in danger or under surveillance, it is also known for being a place where criminals carry out illegal activities — from drug dealing to selling stolen data and weapons.


What was Operation RapTor?

The FBI’s mission, called Operation RapTor, focused on stopping the sale of illegal drugs through online black markets. Authorities arrested hundreds of people connected to these sites — not just the sellers, but also the buyers, website managers, and people who handled the money.

One of the most alarming parts of this case was the amount of fentanyl recovered. Authorities seized more than 317 pounds of it. According to FBI estimates, just 2 pounds of fentanyl could potentially kill about 500,000 people. This shows how serious the danger was.


Why this matters

These drug sellers operated from behind screens, often believing they were untouchable because of the privacy the dark web provides. But investigators were able to find out who they were and stop them from doing more harm. According to FBI leaders, these criminals contributed to drug addiction and violence in many communities across the country.

Aaron Pinder, a key official in the FBI’s cybercrime unit, said the agency has improved at identifying people hiding behind dark web marketplaces. Whether someone is managing the site, selling drugs, moving money, or simply buying drugs, the FBI is now better equipped to track them down.


What’s next?

While this operation won’t shut down the dark web completely, it will definitely make a difference. Removing major players from the drug trade can slow down their operations and make it harder for others to take their place — at least for now.

This is a strong reminder that the dark web, no matter how hidden, is not out of reach for law enforcement. And efforts like these could help save many lives by cutting off the supply of deadly drugs.

FBI Busts 270 in Operation RapTor to Disrupt Dark Web Drug Trade

 

Efforts to dismantle the criminal networks operating on the dark web are always welcome, especially when those networks serve as hubs for stolen credentials, ransomware brokers, and cybercrime gangs. However, the dangers extend far beyond digital crime. A substantial portion of the dark web also facilitates the illicit drug trade, involving some of the most lethal substances available, including fentanyl, cocaine, and methamphetamine. In a major international crackdown, the FBI led an operation targeting top-tier drug vendors on the dark web. 

The coordinated effort, known as Operation RapTor, resulted in 270 arrests worldwide, disrupting a network responsible for trafficking deadly narcotics. The operation spanned the U.S., Europe, South America, and Asia, and confiscated over 317 pounds of fentanyl—a quantity with the potential to cause mass fatalities, given that just 2 pounds of fentanyl can be lethal to hundreds of thousands of people. While the dark web does provide a secure communication channel for those living under oppressive regimes or at risk, it also harbors some of the most heinous activities on the internet. 

From illegal arms and drug sales to human trafficking and the distribution of stolen data, this hidden layer of the web has become a haven for high-level criminal enterprises. Despite the anonymity tools used to access it, such as Tor browsers and encryption layers, law enforcement agencies have made significant strides in infiltrating these underground markets. According to FBI Director Kash Patel, many of the individuals arrested believed they were untouchable due to the secrecy of their operations. “These traffickers hid behind technology, fueling both the fentanyl epidemic and associated violence in our communities. But that ends now,” he stated. 

Aaron Pinder, unit chief of the FBI’s Joint Criminal Opioid and Darknet Enforcement team, emphasized the agency’s growing expertise in unmasking those behind darknet marketplaces. Whether an individual’s role was that of a buyer, vendor, administrator, or money launderer, authorities are now better equipped than ever to identify and apprehend them. Although this operation will not completely eliminate the drug trade on the dark web, it marks a significant disruption of its infrastructure. 

Taking down major players and administrators sends a powerful message and temporarily slows down illegal operations—offering at least some relief in the fight against drug-related cybercrime.

Cybersecurity Agencies on High Alert as Attacks Spike After Pahalgam Incident



A rising tension between India and Pakistan has resulted in an intensified digital war, whose hacktivist groups have launched coordinated cyber offensives targeting government systems and critical infrastructure as a result of increasing tensions between the two countries. The attacks, which are fueled by geopolitical conflict, have expanded beyond the immediate region. 

A report suggests that hacktivist collectives from Asia, the Middle East, and North Africa (MENA) have united to disrupt the Indian cyber ecosystem, according to the report. There was a tragic incident on April 22, when armed terrorists shot a group of tourists in Pahalgam, the serene hill town in Kashmir administered by the Indian government, which was the trigger for this wave of activity. 

According to researchers from NSFOCUS, there had been an immediate and significant surge in cyber activity, which shook the nation. In the aftermath of the attack, cyber activity on both sides of the border intensified. It appears that the initial wave of cyberattacks has stabilised, however, cybersecurity threats persist. India witnessed an increase of 500% in targeted cyber intrusions, and Pakistan faced a rise of 700%. It was reported recently that several Pakistani hacker groups have attempted to breach Indian websites as part of an ongoing digital aggression campaign. 

The Indian cybersecurity agencies have responded robustly to these attempts, which have successfully detected and neutralised most of these threats, despite their efforts to undermine this. According to the reports, hacker collectives such as 'Cyber Group HOAX1337' and 'National Cyber Crew' have targeted websites belonging to the Army Public Schools in Jammu in the past. 

In their attempt to deface the websites, the attackers mocked the victims of the Pahalgam terror attack, which was widely condemned as both distasteful and inflammatory. As a result of the rise in cyber hostilities, we have seen the importance of digital warfare in modern geopolitical conflicts grow. This highlights the need for enhanced cyber vigilance and cross-border security collaboration that must be enhanced. 

The cyber threat landscape has intensified further since India launched Operation Sindoor in retaliation for a military operation targeting suspected terror camps across the border. It has been estimated that the launch of Operation Sindoor on May 7 has resulted in a sharp increase in malicious cyber activity as a result of these attacks, as reported by cybersecurity researchers at Radware and Cyble. 

As a result of the coordinated attacks conducted by hacktivist groups from across the eastern hemisphere, a substantial surge in cyber attacks was recorded on that day alone, with dozens of hacktivist groups actively participating. The Indian government, already dealing with the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack, which took place on April 22, has become the primary target of these attacks. Several threats have been launched against Indian institutions by groups aligned with pro-Pakistan and Bangladeshi interests, as well as with groups aligned with pro-Bangladeshi interests.

Technisanct, a cybersecurity firm based in Kochi, released a report recently in which they noted that there has been a steady increase in offensive operations against government infrastructure, educational platforms, and public services. In various online forums and dark web communities, this wave of cyber aggression has been informally referred to as #OpIndia. 

In many ways, the campaign resembles past hacktivist movements which targeted nations like Israel and the United States, usually motivated by ideological motives, but not necessarily sophisticated enough to threaten the nation's security. The current attacks, experts caution, however, demonstrate a coordinated approach to threats, where threat actors are using both denial-of-service DosS) and defacement attacks to spread propaganda and disrupt networks. 

A sustained cyber battle has been waged between India and Pakistan, marked by both nationalist fervour and geopolitical tension as part of the India-Pakistan conflict, which has clearly evolved into a digital dimension of the conflict. Indian cybersecurity agencies must remain vigilant as they attempt to counter these persistent threats through proactive monitoring and rapid incident response, along with strengthened defensive protocols. 

It was decided by Prime Minister Narendra Modi to convene a cabinet committee on security (CCS) on April 30, 2025, to assess the evolving security situation in Jammu and Kashmir amid rising tensions in the region. During the high-level meeting, which took place at the Prime Minister's official residence on Lok Kalyan Marg, members of the national security apparatus, including Rajnath Singh, Amit Shah, and S. Jaishankar, were present, as well as key national security officials. 

In the discussion, Jaishankar discussed the recent wave of violence in the Kashmir Valley, concerns about cross-border security, and the threat of cyberattacks from hostile actors, as well as the threat of cyberterrorism. The Pakistani government has issued a provocative statement warning of a possible Indian military attack within a 24 to 36-hour window, which is similar to the one issued by Pakistan in a provocative statement. 

According to what Islamabad called credible intelligence, New Delhi is preparing to launch retaliatory strikes. The allegations of Pakistan's involvement in the Pahalgam terror attack of April 22 are supposedly based on unsubstantiated accusations. There has been public criticism of India's fabrication of an offensive narrative by Pakistan's Federal Minister for Information, Attaullah Tarar, cautioning that any such move would result in serious consequences if followed. 

It has been revealed that diplomatic and military signals have increased the level of tension in the existing volatile situation, with both sides locked in a tense standoff that spans both physical and virtual borders. There has been news that threat actors have attempted to deface the official website of Armoured Vehicle Nigam Ltd, which is another indication of the intensification of cyberhostility. It is a public sector company operated by the Ministry of Defence. 

It was reported that the attackers defaced the website by showing images associated with Pakistan, including the national flag and images of the 'Al Khalid' battle tank, an act that was seen as both provocative and symbolic by officials. This development has spurred the Indian cybersecurity agencies and expert teams to increase their real-time monitoring of the digital landscape, as a result of which they are concentrating their efforts on identifying threats that have been linked to Pakistani state-sponsored or affiliated groups. 

The authorities have confirmed that this increased surveillance is part of a greater effort to avert further attacks as well as neutralise any new threats that may arise. To counter the increasing wave of cyberattacks, a series of robust countermeasures is being put in place to strengthen the nation's digital security posture in response. For example, fortifying critical infrastructure, strengthening incident response protocols, and increasing online platform resilience across key industries are all examples of strengthening the nation's digital security posture. 

There was no doubt that the authorities were concerned that these proactive actions were aimed at ensuring India's defence and civilian systems were protected as well as that India's digital frontline was prepared to repel and withstand future cyberattacks as well. It has become increasingly apparent that cyberwarfare has become a central theatre of geopolitical rivalry in the modern world as the contours of contemporary conflict continue to evolve. 

Digital infrastructure, in the same way that physical borders play a crucial role in national security, has recently been heightened by several recent developments, and this serves as a reminder to all of us. Because of this, India needs to enhance its investments in advanced cybersecurity capabilities, establish strong public-private partnerships, and establish a comprehensive national cyber defence strategy that is both responsive and flexible. 

To isolate and neutralise transnational cyber threat actors, it is not only necessary to implement technical fortification but also to conduct strategic diplomacy, share intelligence, and engage in international cooperation. It will be crucial to cultivate a culture of resilience, both at the institutional and individual levels, by cultivating cyber awareness. 

With the increasingly contested digital frontier, India must remain proactive, unified, and forward-thinking at all times if it is to ensure that it is secured, sovereign, and fully “digitally self-reliant” as the threat of hybrid threats rises.

Large-Scale Data Breach at Frederick Health Exposes Patient Records

 


Two separate ransomware incidents have recently affected healthcare providers in Maryland and California and exposed sensitive information belonging to more than 1.1 million patients as a result, according to disclosures filed with federal regulators that recently broke the story. During one of the attacks, cybercriminals reportedly released approximately 480 gigabytes of data that had been unauthorised to be released by a method unknown to them. 

A filing by Frederick Health was filed with the US Department of Health and Human Services on March 28 the confirming that 934,326 individuals were affected by the cybersecurity breach. As reported by the Maryland-based healthcare organisation, the incident occurred on January 27, and it was a result of a ransomware attack that disrupted its computer infrastructure and contributed to the breach of sensitive information. 

It is still unclear how much information was compromised, but affected entities are still engaged in assessment and coordination of response efforts in compliance with federal laws regarding data protection, to find out the extent of the damage done. In the investigation that followed, it became evident that the attackers had gained access to a file-sharing server, which gave them access to various sensitive documents. This data varied from individual to individual, but included a mix of information that can be identified as identifying and data that can be protected by law. 

An attack on the network resulted in hackers obtaining patient names, addresses, birthdays, Social Security numbers, and driver's license information. Additionally, health-related information such as medical records, insurance policy information, and clinical care details was also snipped during the breach. 

There has been no public claim of responsibility for this breach at this point, and the stolen data has not yet been made available on dark web forums or marketplaces, making it possible to speculate that Frederick Health complied with a ransom demand to prevent the data from becoming public. Several steps have been taken by Frederick Health, which employs approximately 4,000 people and operates over 25 facilities, to minimise the negative impact of this security breach on its employees and facilities. 

In response to the incident, the organisation has offered complimentary credit monitoring and identity theft protection services through IDX to individuals who have been affected as part of its response. There were no official comments available, as no official commentary has yet been provided, because trying to contact a spokesperson for Frederick Health was unsuccessful at the time of reporting. 

The incident follows a growing trend in recent years of major data breaches in the healthcare sector. Recently, Blue Shield of California released a surprise announcement that they had been inadvertently exposed to 4.7 million members' protected health information by Google's analytics and advertising tools in the course of a breach announced earlier in the week. 

According to a recent report by Yale New Haven Health System (YNHHS), cybercriminals have gained access to the personal data of approximately 5.5 million patients as a result of an unrelated cyberattack. As a result of these events, the healthcare industry is facing increasingly escalating cybersecurity threats and their resulting consequences. 

Frederick Health was the victim of a ransomware attack in which no threat actor has officially claimed responsibility for the cyberattack, and it is not clear whether a ransom was ultimately paid in response to the cyberattack. As of late March, Frederick Health began sending individual notification letters to those affected, as well as offering complimentary credit monitoring and identity theft protection services to those affected by the disease. 

Upon learning of the breach, the organisation stated that it had since strengthened its cybersecurity infrastructure to protect data and increase monitoring for potential unauthorised access in response to the breach. Frederick Health Medical Group has been slammed in the wake of the breach after at least five class action lawsuits were filed. According to the allegations in the complaint, the organisation failed to implement adequate cybersecurity measures by industry standards, resulting in a significant risk of exposed patient data. 

Aside from this, plaintiffs have argued that the breach notification letters failed to provide adequate transparency, omitting details such as the type of data involved and the specific steps taken to prevent future incidents from being repeated. It was filed by Frederick Health patients Ernest Farkas, Joseph Kingsman, Jaquelyn Chaillet, James Shoemaker, Wesley Kibler, and Jennifer McCreary to bring this action against Frederick Health.

In the lawsuits, it is claimed that a breach in confidentiality has resulted in an ongoing and increased risk of identity theft and financial fraud, as well as additional personal financial burdens that were incurred as a result of efforts to mitigate the impact. A jury trial would supposedly be the best thing that could be done if the plaintiffs could prove negligence on the part of the healthcare provider, which may result in damages, attorney's fees, and punitive measures. 

Taking into account the Frederick Health data breach, it's important to note that it signifies a stark reminder of the growing cybersecurity vulnerabilities facing the healthcare sector-an industry that becomes increasingly reliant on the interconnected digital networks to provide necessary healthcare. Despite the fact that threat actors are continuously evolving their methods of attack, healthcare providers are required to take steps to protect sensitive patient information by adopting advanced security protocols, regularly auditing their systems, and implementing robust incident response strategies. 

In addition to the technical disruptions, such breaches may also affect patient trust, operational integrity and legal liability beyond the technical disruptions they cause. As a result of this incident, patients are reminded that it is important to exercise vigilance — monitoring credit reports, brokerage accounts, and insurance statements for unusual activity, as well as making use of identity protection services when available. 

There is also a responsibility that rests with legislators and regulators to determine whether existing cybersecurity regulations are adequate for creating a safe and secure environment, given the high-risk environment in which healthcare organizations operate today. 

There is no doubt that the Frederick Health case highlights the urgent need for an effective and proactive infrastructure for cybersecurity, one that is capable of not only responding to breaches, but also anticipating and neutralizing them prior to a breach having wide-ranging consequences.

Interlock Ransomware Gang Deploys ClickFix Attacks to Breach Corporate Networks

 

Cybersecurity researchers have revealed that the Interlock ransomware gang has adopted a deceptive social engineering technique called ClickFix to infiltrate corporate networks. This method involves tricking users into executing malicious PowerShell commands under the guise of resolving system errors or completing identity verification steps, leading to the deployment of file-encrypting malware. 

While ClickFix attacks have previously been associated with ransomware campaigns, this marks the first confirmed use by Interlock, a ransomware operation that surfaced in late September 2024. The group targets both Windows systems and FreeBSD servers and maintains a dark web leak portal to pressure victims into paying ransoms that can reach millions of dollars. Interlock does not seem to operate as a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) model. 

According to Sekoia researchers, Interlock began using ClickFix tactics in January 2025. Attackers set up fake websites mimicking legitimate IT tools—such as Microsoft Teams and Advanced IP Scanner—to lure victims. These fake sites prompt users to click a “Fix it” button, which silently copies a malicious PowerShell script to the user’s clipboard. If run, the command downloads a 36MB PyInstaller payload that installs malware under the guise of a legitimate tool. 

Researchers found the malicious campaign hosted on spoofed domains like microsoft-msteams[.]com, microstteams[.]com, ecologilives[.]com, and advanceipscaner[.]com. Only the last domain led to the actual malware dropper disguised as Advanced IP Scanner. When users unknowingly run the script, a hidden PowerShell window executes actions such as system reconnaissance, persistence via Windows Registry, and data exfiltration. The attackers deploy a range of malware via command-and-control (C2) servers, including LummaStealer, BerserkStealer, keyloggers, and the Interlock RAT—a basic remote access trojan capable of dynamic configuration, file exfiltration, shell command execution, and DLL injection. 

Post-compromise, Interlock operators use stolen credentials to move laterally through networks via RDP, leveraging remote access tools like PuTTY, AnyDesk, and LogMeIn. Data is exfiltrated to Azure Blob Storage, after which the Windows variant of Interlock ransomware is scheduled to run daily at 8:00 PM—a redundancy tactic to ensure encryption if the initial payload fails. The gang’s ransom notes have also evolved, now placing emphasis on the legal and regulatory consequences of leaked data. 

ClickFix attacks are gaining popularity among various cybercriminal groups, with recent reports also linking them to North Korean state-sponsored actors like the Lazarus Group, who use similar tactics to target job seekers in the cryptocurrency sector.

FBI Operated ElonmuskWHM: Undercover Money Laundering Site That Handled $90M in Crypto

 

In a bold and controversial move, the FBI operated a money laundering platform on the dark web under the alias “ElonmuskWHM,” aiming to infiltrate the criminal ecosystem it served. According to an investigation by 404 Media, the FBI’s undercover cybercrime operation lasted nearly 11 months and facilitated close to $90 million in cryptocurrency transactions. 

The ElonmuskWHM site allowed cybercriminals—including drug traffickers and hackers—to convert illicit cryptocurrency into cash, often mailed discreetly to customers across the country. In exchange, the operator took a 20% fee. The service, regularly advertised on forums like White House Market (WHM), offered anonymity and required no form of identity verification—making it a go-to laundering tool for bad actors avoiding mainstream exchanges like Coinbase or Binance. 

A 404 Media review of court documents and online evidence confirmed the FBI’s direct role in running the site following the arrest of its original operator, Anurag Pramod Murarka, a 30-year-old Indian national. Murarka was eventually sentenced to over 10 years in prison. During its covert management, the FBI used the ElonmuskWHM site to investigate major crimes including drug trafficking, hacking schemes, and even a violent robbery in San Francisco. 

This FBI crypto sting is part of a broader pattern of law enforcement embedding within the digital underworld. Similar tactics were used in previous operations like Trojan Shield, where the agency ran a fake encrypted phone company named ANOM, secretly monitoring global criminal communications. Another example includes the infiltration of the ransomware group “Hive,” enabling the FBI to intercept communications and disrupt attacks. While effective, the ElonmuskWHM sting also sparked privacy concerns. Court documents reveal that the FBI requested data from Google identifying every user who watched a specific YouTube video, raising red flags about surveillance overreach and potential constitutional violations. 

Still, authorities defend such undercover cybercrime strategies as essential to understanding and dismantling complex digital criminal networks. Gabrielle Dudgeon, spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office, noted that the operation directly supported multiple federal prosecutions and investigations. As cybercrime becomes increasingly sophisticated, law enforcement agencies are evolving too—blurring ethical lines in the process. The ElonmuskWHM operation underscores the high-stakes chess match between digital criminals and those tasked with stopping them.

Dark Web Site DogeQuest Targets Tesla Owners Using Data from ParkMobile Breach

 

A disturbing dark web website known as DogeQuest has surfaced, targeting Tesla owners and associates of Elon Musk by publishing their personal information. The data used on the site appears to have been sourced largely from a 2021 breach of the ParkMobile app, which affected over 21 million users. 

According to privacy research group ObscureIQ, 98.2% of the individuals listed on DogeQuest can be matched to victims of the ParkMobile hack. The site initially operated on the surface web but now functions under a .onion domain, which anonymizes its hosting and complicates takedown efforts by authorities. The purpose of DogeQuest is masked as an “artistic protest” platform, encouraging acts of vandalism against Tesla vehicles. 

Although the site claims neutrality by stating it does not endorse or condemn actions taken, it openly hosts names, home addresses, contact details, and even employment information of more than 1,700 individuals. These include not only Tesla drivers but also DOGE employees, their families, and high-profile individuals from the military, cybersecurity, and diplomatic sectors. The website’s presence has allegedly been linked to real-world vandalism, prompting federal investigations into its operations. 

ObscureIQ’s analysis reveals that the core data used by DogeQuest includes email addresses, phone numbers, and license plate details—information originally accessed through ParkMobile’s compromised Amazon Web Services cloud storage. While ParkMobile claimed at the time that no financial data was exposed, the combination of breached user data and information purchased from data brokers has been enough to target individuals effectively. 

A class-action lawsuit against ParkMobile later resulted in a $32 million settlement for failing to secure user data. Despite the gravity of the situation, no other public reporting had directly connected DogeQuest to the ParkMobile breach until ObscureIQ’s findings were shared. The doxxing platform has evolved into a larger campaign, now also publishing details of prominent federal employees and private sector figures. A spreadsheet reviewed by the Daily Caller News Foundation highlights how widespread and strategic the targeting has become, with individuals from sensitive fields like defense contracting and public health policy among the victims. 

Law enforcement agencies, including the FBI and DOJ, are now actively investigating both the digital and physical components of this campaign. Just last week, the Department of Justice charged three individuals suspected of attacking Tesla vehicles and infrastructure across multiple states. However, officials have not yet confirmed a direct link between these suspects and DogeQuest. The FBI has also noted a troubling increase in swatting incidents aimed at DOGE staff and affiliates, indicating that the site’s influence may extend beyond digital harassment into coordinated real-world disruptions. 

With DogeQuest continuing to evade takedown attempts due to its anonymized hosting, federal authorities face an uphill battle in curbing the campaign. ParkMobile has so far declined to comment on the matter. As the scope and sophistication of this doxxing effort grow, it underscores the lingering impact of data breaches and the increasing challenges in protecting personal information in the digital age.