Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

About Me

Showing posts with label RAT. Show all posts

Emerging Threat Uses Windows Tools to Facilitate Banking Credential Theft


An alarming development that underscores how financial cybercrime is evolving is a Windows-based banking trojan dubbed Coyote. It has been observed for the first time that a malware strain leveraging the Microsoft UI Automation (UIA) framework for stealthy extraction of sensitive user data has emerged. It was developed in 2024 by Kaspersky, and it is specifically targeted at Brazilian users. Through its advanced capabilities, Coyote can log keystrokes, record screenshots, and use deceptive overlays on banking login pages that are designed to fool users into providing their information to the malware. 


A security researcher at Akamai has reported that in the latest variant, the legitimate Microsoft UIA component, which is designed to provide accessibility to desktop UI elements for those with disabilities, is exploited to retrieve credentials from websites linked to 75 financial institutions and cryptocurrency platforms via a phishing attack. A novel abuse of an accessibility tool demonstrates that threat actors are becoming increasingly sophisticated in their attempts to circumvent traditional security measures and compromise digital financial ecosystems. 

The Coyote virus first appeared in Latin American cybersecurity in February 2024 and has since been a persistent and damaging threat across the region. Coyote, a banking trojan, was originally used to steal financial information from unsuspecting users by using traditional methods, such as keylogging and phishing overlays. 

Despite being classified as a banking trojan, its distribution mechanism is based on the popular Squirrel installer, a feature which is also the inspiration for its name, a reference to the coyote-squirrel relationship, which is a predator-prey relationship. It was not long ago that Coyote began targeting Brazilian businesses, with the intent of deploying an information-stealing Remote Access Trojan (RAT) in their networks in an effort to steal information. 

After the malware was discovered, cybersecurity researchers began to discover critical insight into its behaviour as soon as it became apparent. The Fortinet company released a comprehensive technical report in January 2025 that detailed Coyote's attack chain, including the methods used to propagate the attack and the techniques used to infiltrate the system. In the evolution of Coyote from conventional credential theft to sophisticated abuse of legitimate accessibility frameworks, one can see a common theme in modern malware development—a trend in which native system utilities are retooled to facilitate covert surveillance and data theft. 

Through innovation and stealth, Coyote is proving to be an excellent example of how regionally focused threats can rapidly escalate into globally significant risks through the use of innovation and stealth. The Coyote malware has evolved significantly in its attack methodology since its previous appearance in 2015, which has prompted cybersecurity professionals to have new concerns. 

Since December 2024, Akamai researchers have been following Coyote closely, and they have found out that earlier versions of the malware have mainly relied on keylogging and phishing overlays to steal login credentials from users of 75 targeted banking and cryptocurrency websites. However, users had to access financial applications outside of traditional web browsers in order for these methods to work, meaning that browser-based sessions largely remained safe. 

In contrast, Coyote's newest version, which was released earlier this year, demonstrates a markedly higher level of sophistication. Using Microsoft's UI Automation framework (UIA), Coyote can now detect and analyse banking and crypto exchange websites that are open directly within browsers by utilising its Microsoft UI Automation framework. As a result of this enhancement, malware is now able to identify financial activity more accurately and extract sensitive information even from less vulnerable sessions, significantly increasing the scope and impact of the malware. 

With stealth and precision, the Coyote malware activates on a victim's computer as soon as the program they are infected with—typically through the widely used Squirrel installer—is executed on their system. As soon as the malware has been installed, it runs silently in the background, gathering fundamental system details as well as continuously monitoring all active programs and windows. One of the primary objectives of this malware is to detect interactions with cryptocurrency platforms or banking services.

If Coyote detects such activity, it utilises the UI Automation framework (UIA) to programmatically read the content displayed on the screen, bypassing traditional input-based detection mechanisms. Furthermore, the malware is capable of extracting web addresses directly from browser tabs or the address bar, cross-referenced to a predefined list of financial institutions and crypto exchanges that are targeted. This further elevates the malware's threat profile. 

Upon finding a match, the tool initiates a credential harvesting operation that is aimed at capturing credentials such as login information and wallet information. As of right now, Coyote appears to have a geographic focus on Brazilian users, targeting companies like Banco do Brasil, Santander, as well as global platforms like Binance, as well. 

Although it is unlikely that this regional concentration will remain static for long, threat actors often launch malware campaigns in limited geographies for the purpose of testing them out before attempting to spread their campaign to a broader audience. Among the latest versions of Coyote malware, there is an impressive combination of technical refinement and operational stealth that sets it apart from typical financial Trojans in terms of performance.

It is particularly noteworthy that it utilises Microsoft's UI Automation framework to look directly at application window content to be able to steal sensitive information without having to rely on visible URLs or browser titles. There are no longer any traditional techniques for this variant that rely on keylogging or phishing overlays, but rather rely on UI-level reconnaissance that allows it to identify and engage with targeted Brazilian cryptocurrency and banking platforms with remarkable subtlety. Further increasing its evasiveness is its ability to operate offline. 

By doing so, it can gather and scan data without requiring a connection to the command-and-control (C2) server. In order to initiate an attack sequence, the malware first profiles the infected system, obtaining information such as the name of the device, the operating system version, and the credentials of the user. As a result, Coyote scans the titles of active windows in an attempt to find financial platforms that are well-known. 

If no direct match is found, Coyote escalates its efforts by parsing the visual user interface elements via the UIA interface, resulting in critical data such as URLs and tab labels that are crucial for the application. As soon as the application detects a target, it uses an array of credential harvesting techniques, which include token interception and direct access to usernames and passwords.

Although the current campaign remains focused in Brazil, the fact that Coyote can operate undetected at the user interface layer and that it uses native Windows APIs poses a serious and scalable threat to businesses across the globe. Considering its offline functionality, small network footprint, and ability to evade standard security solutions, it is a potent reminder that legitimate system tools can be repurposed to quietly undermine digital defences complex cybersecurity landscape that is getting ever more complex. 

Cybersecurity is rapidly evolving, and it is becoming increasingly apparent to us that the dynamic between threat actors and defenders has become more of a high-stakes game, where innovation can change the balance quite rapidly between the two sides. A case study such as the Coyote malware underscores the fact that even system components which appear harmless, such as Microsoft's UI Automation (UIA) framework, can be exploited to achieve malicious objectives. 

Although UIA was created to enhance accessibility and usability, the abuse of the tool by advanced malware proves the inherent risks associated with native tools that are trusted. The objective of security researchers is to give defenders a better understanding of the inner workings and methods employed by Coyote, so they can detect, mitigate, and respond more effectively to such stealthy intrusions. 

It is important to note that the exploitation of UIA as an attack vector is not simply a tactic that is used for a single attack-it signals a shift in adversarial strategy that emphasises invisibility and manipulation of systems. Organisations must strengthen their security posture by observing how legitimate technologies may be repurposed as a means to commit cybercrime, as well as staying vigilant against threats that blur the line between utility and vulnerability. 

There is no question that the advent of Coyote malware marked a turning point in the evolution of cyber threats. It underscores the growing abuse of legitimate system tools for malicious purposes as well. Using Microsoft's UI Automation framework (UIA), an accessibility feature which was created to support users with disabilities, Coyote illustrates to us that trusted functionality could be repurposed to steal information from systems by silently infiltrating them. 

The malware operations of this company, which are currently focused on Brazilian financial institutions and crypto exchanges, represent the emerging trend toward stealth-driven malware campaigns that target specific regions of the globe. A call to action has been issued to defenders by this evolution, as traditional security tools that are based on network-based detection or signature matching may not be up to the task of combating threats that operate entirely within the user interface layer and do not require the use of command-and-control communications. 

Consequently, organisations have to develop more nuanced strategies to keep their data secure, such as behavioural monitoring, heuristic analysis, and visibility of native API usage. As a further precaution, maintaining strict controls over software distribution methods, such as Squirrel installers, is also a great way to prevent the spread of early-stage infections. By adopting a silent, system-native approach, Coyote reflects a change in the cyber threat landscape, shifting away from overt, disruptive attacks to covert, credential-stealing surveillance. 

Coyote utilizes low-noise approaches to achieve maximum data exfiltration, often as part of long-term campaigns, in order to evade detection, resulting in maximum data exfiltration. This demonstrates the sophistication of modern malware and the urgent need for adaptive cybersecurity frameworks to cope with these threats. In addition to exploiting UIA, it is also likely that it will result in more widespread abuse of accessibility features that have traditionally been overlooked in security planning, and which may eventually become a major security concern.

As threat actors continue to refine their approaches, companies need to be vigilant, rethink what constitutes potential attack surfaces, and take measures to detect threats as soon as possible. Coyote is an example of malware that requires a combination of stronger tools, as well as a deeper understanding of the way even helpful technology can be turned into a security liability quickly if it is misused.

Cybercriminals Are Now Tricking Holidaymakers: How You Can Stay Safe

 


People planning their holidays are now facing a sneaky online threat. Cyber experts have discovered that hackers are building fake travel websites that closely resemble popular booking platforms. These websites are designed to fool people who are searching for vacation deals.


Imitation Websites Can Fool You

Researchers from HP Wolf Security have found that cyber attackers are copying the design of trusted travel sites, such as Booking.com. The fake pages use the same colours, logos, and overall style as the real ones, making it very difficult for most people to spot the difference.

However, there is a key warning sign. The information on these fake sites appears blurry or unclear. On top of this blurred page, a pop-up message shows up asking you to accept cookies.

Most internet users are familiar with cookie permission requests. Accepting cookies is normally safe and helps websites remember your settings. But in this scam, clicking on the cookie button secretly starts downloading harmful files.


What Happens When You Click?

When someone clicks to accept the cookies on these fake sites, a dangerous file is immediately downloaded to their computer. This file installs a type of harmful program known as a remote access trojan, or RAT.

The specific malware used in this case is called XWorm. Once installed, this program gives hackers full control over the device. The attackers can view your personal files, turn on your camera or microphone, shut down your security software, install other harmful programs, and steal important information such as passwords.


Why Holidaymakers Are Being Targeted

The security team noticed that this scam began spreading in early 2025. This period is when many people are busy planning summer trips and are more likely to click quickly without checking details carefully.

Experts also explained that because cookie banners have become a normal part of browsing, many people automatically click to accept without stopping to think. Hackers are using this habit to spread their malware more easily.


How to Protect Yourself

The most important way to stay safe is to slow down when browsing travel websites. Always check the web address carefully to make sure you are on the official website. Be extra careful if the page looks blurry, or if the cookie pop-up seems strange.

Take your time before clicking anything. Do not rush when making bookings, even if you feel excited or pressured. Scammers depend on people clicking too quickly.

Being careful and paying attention can help keep you safe from these kinds of online traps. Always verify the website before you move forward.

New AI Video Tool Scam Delivers Noodlophile Malware to Steal Your Data

 

Cybercriminals are using fake AI-powered video generation tools to spread a newly discovered malware strain called ‘Noodlophile’, disguised as downloadable media content.

Fraudulent websites with names like "Dream Machine" are being promoted in high-visibility Facebook groups, pretending to be advanced AI tools that can generate videos from user-uploaded files. However, these platforms are actually fronts for distributing information-stealing malware.

While cybercriminals leveraging AI for malware distribution isn't new, Morphisec researchers have uncovered a fresh campaign that introduces this new infostealer. “Noodlophile” is currently being sold on dark web forums, frequently bundled with services like "Get Cookie + Pass," indicating it's part of a malware-as-a-service operation linked to Vietnamese-speaking threat actors.

Once a victim uploads their file to the fake site, they receive a ZIP archive that supposedly contains the generated video. Instead, the archive includes a misleading executable named "Video Dream MachineAI.mp4.exe" and a hidden folder housing essential files for subsequent malware stages. On systems with file extensions hidden, the file could appear to be a harmless video.

"The file Video Dream MachineAI.mp4.exe is a 32-bit C++ application signed using a certificate created via Winauth," explains Morphisec.

This executable is actually a modified version of CapCut, a legitimate video editing software (version 445.0), and the naming and certificate are used to deceive both users and antivirus software.

Once run, the file executes a sequence of commands that launch a batch script (Document.docx/install.bat). This script then uses the Windows tool 'certutil.exe' to decode and extract a base64-encoded, password-protected RAR file that mimics a PDF. It also adds a registry key to maintain persistence on the system.

The batch script then runs srchost.exe, which executes an obfuscated Python script (randomuser2025.txt) from a hardcoded remote server. This leads to the in-memory execution of the Noodlophile stealer.

If Avast antivirus is found on the system, the malware uses PE hollowing to inject its code into RegAsm.exe. If not, it resorts to shellcode injection.

"Noodlophile Stealer represents a new addition to the malware ecosystem. Previously undocumented in public malware trackers or reports, this stealer combines browser credential theft, wallet exfiltration, and optional remote access deployment," explains the Morphisec researchers.

The malware targets data like browser credentials, session cookies, tokens, and cryptocurrency wallets. Stolen information is sent through a Telegram bot, acting as a stealthy command and control (C2) channel. In some cases, Noodlophile is also packaged with XWorm, a remote access trojan (RAT), enabling more aggressive data theft.

How to Stay Safe:
  • Avoid downloading files from unverified websites.
  • Double-check file extensions—don’t trust names alone.
  • Always run downloads through a reliable, up-to-date antivirus tool before executing.


Compromised npm Package 'rand-user-agent' Used to Spread Remote Access Trojan

 

A widely-used npm package, rand-user-agent, has fallen victim to a supply chain attack, where cybercriminals injected obfuscated code designed to install a Remote Access Trojan (RAT) on users’ systems.

Originally developed to generate randomized user-agent strings—helpful in web scraping, automation, and cybersecurity research—the package was deprecated but remained in use, logging approximately 45,000 downloads per week.

Security experts at Aikido uncovered the compromise on May 5, 2025, when their malware detection tools flagged version 1.0.110 of rand-user-agent. A deeper investigation revealed hidden malicious code in the dist/index.js file. This code was deliberately obscured and only viewable with horizontal scrolling on the npm website.

Researchers confirmed that the last legitimate release was version 2.0.82, uploaded seven months ago. The malicious code appeared in unauthorized versions 2.0.83, 2.0.84, and 1.0.110, none of which corresponded with updates on the project's GitHub repository—an indicator of foul play.

Once installed, the malicious versions create a hidden directory in the user’s home path (~/.node_modules) and modify the module loading path to prioritize this directory. They then load specific dependencies such as axios and socket.io-client, and establish a persistent connection to the attacker’s command and control (C2) server at http://85.239.62[.]36:3306.

Through this connection, the attacker retrieves critical system data—such as hostname, OS type, username, and a generated UUID. Once activated, the RAT listens for the following commands:
  • cd <path>: Change directory
  • ss_dir: Reset directory to script path
  • ss_fcd:<path>: Force change to a new directory
  • ss_upf:f,d: Upload single file
  • ss_upd:d,dest: Upload all files in a directory
  • ss_stop: Stop ongoing upload
  • Any other input is executed via child_process.exec()

Currently, the malicious versions have been removed from the npm repository. Developers are urged to revert to the latest clean version. However, users who installed versions 2.0.83, 2.0.84, or 1.0.110 are advised to run a full malware scan, as downgrading the package does not eliminate the RAT.

For continued use, it’s recommended to switch to a forked and actively maintained alternative of rand-user-agent.

The original developer responded to BleepingComputer with the following statement:

“On 5 May 2025 (16:00 UTC) we were alerted that three unauthorized versions of rand-user-agent had been published to the npm registry (1.0.110, 2.0.83, 2.0.84). The malicious code was never present in our GitHub repository; it was introduced only in the npm artifacts, making this a classic supply-chain attack.

Our investigation (still ongoing) shows that the adversary obtained an outdated automation token from an employee and used it to publish releases to npm. That token had not been scoped with 2-factor authentication, allowing the attacker to: Publish versions that did not exist in GitHub, Increment the version numbers to appear legitimate, Deprecate nothing, hoping the new releases would propagate before anyone noticed.

There is no evidence of a breach in our source-code repository, build pipeline, or corporate network. The incident was limited to the npm registry.

We apologize to every developer and organization impacted by this incident. Protecting the open-source ecosystem is a responsibility we take seriously, and we are committed to full transparency as we close every gap that allowed this attack to occur.”

North Korean Hackers Use 11 Malicious npm Packages to Propagate BeaverTail Malware

 

The North Korean threat actors behind the ongoing Contagious Interview campaign are expanding their tentacles on the npm ecosystem by distributing more malicious packages including the BeaverTail malware and a new remote access trojan (RAT) loader. 

"These latest samples employ hexadecimal string encoding to evade automated detection systems and manual code audits, signaling a variation in the threat actors' obfuscation techniques," Socket security researcher Kirill Boychenko noted in a report. 

The following packages were downloaded over 5,600 times before being removed: empty-array-validator, twitterapis, debugger-vite, snore-log, core-pino, events-utils, icloud-cod, cln-logger, node-clog, and consolidate-log. 

The announcement comes nearly a month after six npm packages were discovered to be distributing BeaverTail, a JavaScript stealer that can also deploy a Python-based backdoor known as InvisibleFerret. The campaign's ultimate purpose is to breach developer systems using the premise of a job interview, steal sensitive data, syphon financial assets, and maintain long-term access to compromised networks. 

The newly discovered npm packages masquerade as utilities and debuggers, with one of them - dev-debugger-vite - utilising a command-and-control (C2) address previously identified by SecurityScorecard as being used by the Lazarus Group in a campaign called Phantom Circuit in December 2024.

What distinguishes these packages is that some of them, like events-utils and icloud-cod, are connected to Bitbucket repositories rather than GitHub. Furthermore, the icloud-cod package was discovered to be located in a directory called "eiwork_hire," confirming the threat actor's usage of interview-related themes to activate the infection. 

An investigation of the packages, cln-logger, node-clog, consolidate-log, and consolidate-logger, revealed slight code-level differences, indicating that the attackers are publishing numerous malware variants to boost the campaign's success rate.

Regardless of the alterations, the malicious code encoded in the four packages acts as a remote access trojan (RAT) loader, capable of spreading a next-stage payload from a remote server. Cybersecurity expert Boychenko stated that the exact nature of the malware being disseminated via the loader is unknown at this time due to the C2 endpoints no longer serving payloads. 

"The code functions as an active malware loader with remote access trojan (RAT) capabilities," Boychenko noted. "It dynamically fetches and executes remote JavaScript via eval(), enabling North Korean attackers to run arbitrary code on infected systems. This behavior allows them to deploy any follow-up malware of their choosing, making the loader a significant threat on its own.” 

The findings highlight the persistent nature of Contagious Interview, which, in addition to posing a long-term threat to software supply chains, has adopted the infamous ClickFix social engineering approach to propagate malware. 

The discovery of the new npm packages comes as South Korean cybersecurity firm AhnLab outlined a recruitment-themed phishing effort that downloads BeaverTail, which is subsequently used to launch a previously undocumented Windows backdoor known as Tropidoor. The firm's analysis of data shows that BeaverTail is actively targeting developers in South Korea.

Chinese Threat Actors Leveraging 'Noodle RAT' Backdoor

 

A backdoor in Executable and Linkable Format (ELF) files used by Chinese hackers has been misidentified as a version of existing malware for years, Trend Micro claimed in a recent analysis. 

In Noodle RAT: Reviewing the New Backdoor utilised by Chinese-Speaking Groups, a blog post based on a Botconf 2024 presentation, Trend Micro Research revealed Noodle RAT, a remote access Trojan employed by Chinese-speaking groups involved in espionage or criminal activity.

Noodle RAT, aka ANGRYREBEL or Nood RAT, has been active since at least 2018. However, it was always regarded as a variant of an existing malware strain, such as Gh0st RAT or Rekoobe.

“For instance, NCC Group released a report on a variant of Gh0st RAT used by Iron Tiger in 2018. Talos released a report on an ELF backdoor used by Rocke (aka Iron Cybercrime Group) in 2018. Sophos released a report on a Linux version of the Gh0st RAT variant used in the Cloud Snooper Campaign in 2018. Positive Technology Security released a report on Calypso RAT used by Calypso APT in 2019,” noted Trend Micro. 

The cybersecurity provider's threat intelligence team revealed that the ELF backdoor mentioned in these reports was actually a new malware strain known as Noodle RAT. 

Noodle RAT: New Malware Strain

Since 2020, the researchers claim to have discovered espionage campaigns employing Noodle RAT that targeted Thailand, India, Japan, Malaysia, and Taiwan. 

The Windows version of Noodle RAT contains several links to Gh0st RAT, a malware strain developed by the C. Rufus Security Team in China and exposed in 2008. For example, Win.NOODLERAT and Gh0st RAT share plugins, and the former employs a slightly similar packet encryption method to that employed by various Gh0st RAT variants, including Gh0stCringe, HiddenGh0st, and Gh0stTimes. 

However, the rest of Win.NOODLERAT and Gh0st RAT's code does not appear to be comparable, prompting Trend Micro to infer that the plugins were simply reused, despite the fact that the backdoor is completely different. 

Additionally, some Linux.NOODLERAT's code is identical to Rekoobe v2018, a backdoor built on Tiny SHell (or tsh) whose source code is freely available on GitHub. Specifically, both use the same reverse shell and process name spoofing techniques. 

“Still, since the rest of the code of Linux.NOODLERAT is totally different from any version of Rekoobe or Tiny SHell, we can conclude that Linux.NOODLERAT should be classified as another malware family,” Trend Micro concluded.

China Caught Deploying Remote Access Trojan Tailored for FortiGate Devices

 

The Military Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD) of the Netherlands has issued a warning regarding the discovery of a new strain of malware believed to be orchestrated by the Chinese government. Named "Coathanger," this persistent and highly elusive malware has been identified as part of a broader political espionage agenda, targeting vulnerabilities in FortiGate devices.

In a recent advisory, MIVD disclosed that Coathanger was employed in espionage activities aimed at the Dutch Ministry of Defense (MOD) in 2023. Investigations into the breach revealed that the malware exploited a known flaw in FortiGate devices, specifically CVE-2022-42475.
Coathanger operates as a second-stage malware and does not exploit any novel vulnerabilities. 
Unlike some malware that relies on new, undisclosed vulnerabilities (zero-day exploits), Coathanger operates as a second-stage malware and does not exploit any novel vulnerabilities. However, the advisory emphasizes that it could potentially be used in conjunction with future vulnerabilities in FortiGate devices.

Described as stealthy and resilient, Coathanger evades detection by concealing itself through sophisticated methods, such as hooking system calls to evade detection. It possesses the capability to survive system reboots and firmware upgrades, making it particularly challenging to eradicate.

According to Dutch authorities, Coathanger is just one component of a larger-scale cyber espionage campaign orchestrated by Chinese state-sponsored threat actors. These actors target various internet-facing edge devices, including firewalls, VPN servers, and email servers.

The advisory issued by Dutch intelligence underscores the aggressive scanning tactics employed by Chinese threat actors, who actively seek out both disclosed and undisclosed vulnerabilities in edge devices. It warns of their rapid exploitation of vulnerabilities, sometimes within the same day they are made public.

Given the popularity of Fortinet devices as cyberattack targets, businesses are urged to prioritize patch management. Recent reports from Fortinet highlighted the discovery of two critical vulnerabilities in its FortiSIEM solution, emphasizing the importance of prompt patching.

To mitigate the risk posed by Coathanger and similar threats, intelligence analysts recommend conducting regular risk assessments on edge devices, restricting internet access on these devices, implementing scheduled logging analysis, and replacing any hardware that is no longer supported.

Unveiling 'Bandook': A Threat that Adapts and Persists

 


The Bandook malware family, which was thought to be extinct, is back and may be part of a larger operation intended to sell offensive hacking tools to governments and cybercriminal groups to attack them. Several recent research papers have been released by Check Point Research, which indicate that Bandook is regaining popularity across a wide range of targeted sectors and locations despite being a 13-year-old bank, Trojan. 

It has been observed that dozens of variants of the malware have been used in attacks in the United States, Singapore, Cyprus, Chile, Italy, Turkey, Switzerland, Indonesia and Germany over the past year in attacks against organizations. Government, finance, energy, food, healthcare, education, IT, and legal are some of the sectors targeted by the software. 

In 2007, Bandook malware was discovered as a remote access trojan (RAT) that has been active for several years. It has been reported that Bandook malware has evolved into a new variant that injects its payload into msinfo32.exe to distribute the malware and allow remote attackers to take control of the system if it is infected. As a result, this remote access trojan poses a significant threat to users privacy, as it is capable of performing various tasks allowing cybercriminals to gather various types of personal data. 

Therefore, my recommendation would be to avoid installing it if people are gaming their system and its usage can lead to several problems. Originally developed as a commercial RAT written in both Delphi and C++, Bandook RAT eventually evolved into several variants over the years, and this malware became available for download from the internet. Formerly a commercial RAT, Bandook was originally developed by a Lebanese named Prince Ali as a commercial RAT. 

It is common for remote access trojans to be used to remotely manage infected computers, without the consent of the users. In addition to keylogging, audio capture (microphone) and video capture (webcam), screenshot capture and uploading to a remote server, and running various command shell programs, this malware is capable of performing a variety of malicious activities. 

Cybercriminals could take advantage of this situation to gain access to personal accounts (for example, social networks, emails, banks, etc.). To gain as much revenue as possible, these people will use hijacked accounts for various purposes such as online purchases, money transfers, asking the victim's friends to lend them money, etc. Consequently, they are likely to make misuse of hijacked accounts. 

Moreover, thieves can use hijacked accounts to spread malware, sending malicious files and links to all contacts in the account. They can also utilize Bandook to launch several Windows shell commands, which could result in a significant loss of savings and debt. A Trojan horse is often used to spread infections, such as ransomware and crypto miners since they can modify system settings as well as download (inject) additional malware. 

Trojan horses are also often used to spread viruses and malware. There is a risk that this infection will result in significant financial loss, serious privacy issues (such as identity theft), as well as additional infections of the computer system. The last time Bandook was spotted was in 2015 as part of the "Operation Manul" campaign, while the last time it was spotted was in 2017-2018 as part of the "Dark Caracal" campaign. 

During the last few years, the malware had all but disappeared from the threat landscape, but it appears it has begun to resurface again. An infected computer will receive a malware chain consisting of three stages. The first stage is to download two files into the local user folder using a lure document, which contains malicious VBA macro code encoded with an encryption algorithm. 

First, there is a PowerShell script file that gets dropped into the user's folder, and the second file is a JPG file which contains a base64 encoded PowerShell script that is saved in the JPG file. Its second stage will be the decoding and executing of the base64 encoded PowerShell scripts stored in the JPG file, which will render a zip file containing four files from cloud services, then download the zip file containing the files in the zip file. 

Among the four files, three of them are PNG files with hidden RC4 functions encapsulated in the RGB values of the pixels that belong to the RGB file. As a result of the existence of these files, an executable that acts as a Bandook loader will be constructed. 

After the creation of the Internet Explorer process, the bandook loader will inject the malicious payload into the process and then proceed to the final stage of the process. It is the payload that makes contact with the command and control server, and it waits for the server to give additional commands.