Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Showing posts with label social engineering. Show all posts

FBI Flags SafePay Ransomware as One of 2026’s Most Active Threats After 600 Victims

 



The FBI, alongside cybersecurity authorities in Germany and the United Kingdom, issued a joint advisory this week warning that a ransomware group called SafePay has compromised at least 600 organizations across the United States and Europe since it surfaced in late 2024, placing it among the most active extortion operations active right now.

The advisory, which draws on FBI and German law enforcement investigations, marks a significant escalation in attention for a group that operated in relative obscurity before racking up victims at a pace that rivals far better-known criminal networks. The most recent incident cited in the advisory occurred in August.


A Group Built on Borrowed Code

SafePay is not a ransomware-as-a-service operation, meaning it does not rent out its tools to outside affiliates the way groups like RansomHub do. Instead, it runs as a centralized crew, which security researchers say likely keeps operations tighter and reduces the risk of internal leaks.

Its malware, however, did not emerge from nothing. Analysts at Bitdefender and others found that SafePay's ransomware binary closely mirrors a late-2022 version of LockBit's code, with additional elements borrowed from ALPHV and INC Ransom. The group surfaced around the same period that law enforcement actions gutted LockBit in early 2024, and some researchers suspect its members include former Conti or LockBit operators who reconstituted under a new name. A telling technical detail: the ransomware includes a kill switch that deactivates itself on systems with Russian or Cyrillic as the default language, a pattern commonly associated with Eastern European criminal groups trying to avoid prosecution at home.


Getting In and Moving Fast

SafePay gets into networks through a combination of methods. The advisory lists password guessing, phishing, and exploitation of known vulnerabilities, including flaws in Cisco VPN products and Veeam backup software, as primary entry points. The group also buys stolen credentials from initial access brokers on dark web markets and uses automated scripts to scan the internet for exposed systems.

Once inside, the group moves quickly. Attacks have been documented going from initial access to full ransomware deployment in under 24 hours. Operators create new accounts or hijack existing ones, use Windows' own built-in tools to map the network, and disable security software using living-off-the-land techniques that avoid dropping obvious malware. Data is archived with WinRAR or 7-Zip and transferred out via FileZilla or RClone before encryption begins. In some cases, attackers change user passwords to lock out IT staff and slow down the response.

The group has also adopted a social engineering playbook that goes well beyond a simple phishing link. In several documented attacks, SafePay flooded employees with thousands of spam messages to overwhelm their inboxes, then followed up by impersonating IT support over Microsoft Teams or through direct phone calls. Vishing specialists, sometimes hired as a third-party service, would then convince employees to hand over remote access through Microsoft Quick Assist or approve multi-factor authentication prompts.


A Pattern of High-Profile Hits

Three incidents stand out in terms of impact. Government technology contractor Conduent confirmed an attack that disrupted Medicaid payments, child support disbursements, food assistance programs, and roadway tolls in multiple U.S. states. Conduent recently agreed to an $80 million class action settlement over the breach. British transport technology firm Microlise was hit in October 2024, disrupting DHL delivery operations and security systems installed in UK Ministry of Justice prisoner transport vans. In July 2025, researchers linked SafePay to an attack on Ingram Micro, one of the world's largest IT distributors, with analysts estimating the disruption cost the company at least $136 million in daily sales while order fulfillment was offline.


Germany as a Primary Target

Among the countries SafePay has focused on, Germany stands out. During the first quarter of 2025, Check Point Research found that 24 percent of all publicly reported ransomware victims in Germany were attributed to SafePay, the highest concentration of any single ransomware group in any single country during that period. The advisory confirms that dozens of German companies appear on SafePay's dark web leak site alongside government organizations across Latin America and the United States.


Ransom Demands Framed as a Business Transaction

SafePay's ransom notes describe the payment demand as "a subset of company revenue," typically falling between one and three percent of the victim's annual revenue. The group uses cryptocurrency for payments and, according to the advisory, sometimes employs third parties to make phone calls to pressure victims into paying. In cases where paying could expose a victim to regulatory penalties, the group has reportedly offered reduced demands.

The joint advisory stops short of attributing SafePay to any specific country or naming individual suspects.



How the Apple Copy-Paste Scam Can Give Attackers Remote Access to Your Mac

 


Apple users are being urged to exercise caution when following troubleshooting instructions found online after cybersecurity experts underlined a growing social engineering tactic that tricks victims into pasting malicious commands into the macOS Terminal application. Rather than exploiting a flaw in macOS itself, the scam relies on convincing users to voluntarily execute commands that can install malware, grant attackers remote access, or expose sensitive information stored on their devices.

Often referred to as a "copy-paste" scam, the technique targets users unfamiliar with Terminal, a command-line interface included with macOS that enables direct interaction with the operating system through text-based commands. While the application is commonly used by developers, system administrators and advanced users to automate tasks or manage system settings, executing unfamiliar commands without understanding their function can introduce significant security risks.

Unlike traditional malware campaigns that exploit software vulnerabilities, this attack depends almost entirely on social engineering. Cybercriminals impersonate trusted sources or create convincing troubleshooting scenarios to persuade victims that running a Terminal command is necessary to fix a technical issue, improve security or restore system performance. Once executed, however, the command may download malicious software, establish remote access, alter security settings or perform other unauthorized actions without the user's awareness.

Depending on the instructions provided, attackers could gain access to documents, photographs, emails, browser data, financial information, saved credentials and contact lists stored on the Mac. Some malicious scripts may also deploy keylogging software capable of recording everything a victim types, including usernames, passwords and other confidential information. In more severe cases, attackers could install ransomware or persistence mechanisms that allow them to retain access to the compromised system even after a restart.

Security researchers note that the scam can begin through multiple channels. Victims may receive phishing emails or text messages containing the malicious command, encounter it in online discussion forums disguised as a legitimate solution, or visit fraudulent websites presenting it as an official troubleshooting step. Attackers have also been observed posing as technical support representatives over the phone, carefully instructing victims to open Terminal and manually type commands under the pretense of resolving an issue.

The rise of generative artificial intelligence has introduced another avenue for abuse. Threat actors may intentionally publish malicious commands across public websites and discussion platforms in an effort to influence AI-powered assistants through a technique known as indirect prompt injection. If an AI system retrieves or references poisoned content while responding to a user's troubleshooting request, it could inadvertently recommend unsafe commands. Although AI tools continue to improve their safeguards, cybersecurity experts advise users to independently verify any command before executing it on their systems.

The attack typically follows a similar pattern. After directing a user to open the Terminal application located within the Utilities folder inside Applications, the attacker provides one or more commands and claims they are required to diagnose, repair or secure the computer. In reality, those commands may download remote administration tools, retrieve additional payloads from external servers, modify system configurations or provide unauthorized access to the attacker's infrastructure.

Because the attack depends on user participation rather than exploiting a software flaw, many victims may not immediately recognize they are being targeted. Individuals unfamiliar with Terminal often have little reason to question commands presented by someone claiming to represent Apple, a software vendor or a technical support service. Similarly, users searching online for solutions may encounter malicious instructions embedded within forum posts or copied across multiple websites, making them appear credible.

To help reduce the effectiveness of these attacks, Apple introduced additional safeguards in recent versions of macOS. When users who do not regularly work in Terminal attempt to paste commands copied from websites, messaging platforms, email applications or chatbots, the operating system may interrupt the action with a warning indicating that the pasted content could contain malware or compromise privacy. Rather than automatically executing the command, the prompt encourages users to reconsider before proceeding.

Apple has also expanded malware detection capabilities within Terminal. If the operating system identifies known malicious content or scripts, it can block execution and notify the user that the pasted command has been prevented because it poses a security risk. These protections are designed to slow down impulsive actions and reduce the likelihood of users unknowingly compromising their own systems.

Cybersecurity professionals emphasize that no security warning should replace careful judgment. Users should never execute Terminal commands they do not fully understand, regardless of whether the instructions originate from an email, text message, online forum, chatbot or unsolicited phone call. Requests accompanied by pressure tactics or claims that immediate action is required should be treated with particular suspicion, as creating a false sense of urgency remains one of the most common techniques used in phishing campaigns.

Experts also caution against assuming that information found on public forums or generated by AI assistants is inherently trustworthy. Malicious instructions can spread rapidly across the internet and may be reproduced by multiple sources, giving them an appearance of legitimacy. Verifying guidance through official Apple documentation or other trusted security resources before executing any command remains one of the most effective ways to avoid becoming a victim of Terminal-based social engineering attacks.