In the event that this occurs, outsiders will have access to your bank account information and other private information. They may even be able to listen in on your private discussions with loved ones, parents, or other family members.
However, you can tell if your wifi has been hacked or not by looking for these five indicators:
If your internet provider is normally trouble-free, an abrupt and unusual slowdown in your access to the internet may indicate that hackers have attacked your router.
Unknown gadgets, sometimes known as rogue devices, may indicate that hackers are trying to access private data from your router.
If you see this, you need to check if any unidentified devices are included in the list of connected devices by logging in to your router's IP address, which is typically found on the router itself.
Should this occur without warning, there may be a connection to hacker activity.
You won't be able to access the router and resolve the problem on your own because these annoying hackers typically alter your login credentials after they have access.
If you notice any strange new software on your device, it can be a sign that hackers have been targeting your network and maybe installing malware.
You will almost certainly notice this: if your browser starts directing you to strange websites, it's possible that hackers have altered your DNS settings. You may also notice things like ransomware messages appearing that purport to have sensitive data or photos, suggesting that hackers may have gained access to your router.
Fake purchasers will often contact real sellers of goods and appear to be interested in making a purchase in an attempt to obtain your private information.
The scammer would then lie and claim to have transferred monies that are only available through a dubious link, so the transaction never actually happens.
Usually, the link is a phishing one, where the seller enters their bank card information thinking they will get money, but inadvertently allows their account to be drained. There are, nevertheless, safety measures you can do. Downloading antivirus software would help prevent those hackers from getting near you.
Caceres launched a one-man cyberwar that disrupted every publicly visible website in North Korea, keeping them offline for over a week. But who was this mysterious figure, and what drove him to such extreme measures?
Alejandro Caceres, a 38-year-old Colombian-American cybersecurity entrepreneur, hardly fits the profile of a cyberwarrior. Yet, his personal vendetta against North Korean spies pushed him to the brink.
Having been targeted by North Korean agents earlier, Caceres reported the incidents to the FBI, only to receive no government support. Frustrated and disillusioned, he decided to take matters into his own hands. His mission: to send a message to Kim Jong Un’s regime that messing with American hackers would have consequences.
As Caceres executed his attack, he adopted the pseudonym “P4x.” The name was a clever nod to his intention: to force peace with North Korea through the threat of his own punitive measures.
By hiding behind this moniker, he hoped to evade both North Korean retaliation and potential criminal hacking charges from his own government. P4x became the faceless avenger, a digital vigilante with a singular purpose.
Armed with custom-built programs and cloud-based servers, Caceres disrupted North Korea’s internet infrastructure. His attacks were intermittent, calculated, and relentless. Publicly visible websites blinked out of existence, leaving the regime scrambling for answers.
Caceres provided screen-capture videos and real-time evidence of his disruption, all while remaining hidden in his coastal Florida home.
Caceres’ story underscores the power of a single individual in the vast digital landscape. In a world dominated by nation-states and cyber armies, he stood alone against North Korea. His actions were audacious, risky, and morally ambiguous. Was he a hero or a rogue? The answer, perhaps, lies in the gray areas of cyberwarfare.
As North Korea’s internet flickered and faltered, Caceres sent a message: No one is untouchable. Even the most secretive regime could be disrupted by a determined hacker. His personal vendetta had transformed into a geopolitical statement. The world watched as North Korea’s cyber defenses crumbled, and P4x became a legend.
In regard to this, a probe has been launched by Ireland’s watchdog. According to the Data Protection Commission (DPC) it "will examine Twitter's compliance with data protection law in relation to that security issue."
As per the reports, Twitter did not comment on this claim yet, nor did it respond to the press inquiries regarding the claimed breach.
The stolen data apparently includes victims’ phone numbers and emails, including that of some celebrities and politicians. While the exact size of the haul is yet to be confirmed, only a small “sample” has been made public thus far.
Several Hints May Prove the Claim
A cybercrime intelligence firm 'Hudson Rock' was the first to bring up the issue of the sale of stolen data. One of the company's chief technology officers told BBC that several hints seemed to back up the hacker's assertion.
The data did not seem to have been copied from some earlier breach, where the details were made public from 5.4 million Twitter accounts.
Out of the 1,000 sample emails provided by the hacker in the earlier incident, only 40 emails appeared, "so we are confident that this breach is different and significantly bigger," the officer said.
Additionally, Mr. Gal noted: "The hacker aims to sell the database through an escrow service that is offered on a cyber-crime forum. Typically this is only done for real offerings." An escrow service is a third party that agrees to release funds but only after certain conditions are met (for example handing over data)
The hacker has said that the breached data was obtained and gathered by taking advantage of a vulnerability in the system, that enables computer programs to connect with Twitter.
The DCP on the other hand announced that it was investigating the earlier breach that took place on December 23, 2022. Moreover, media reports assert that the hacker is in fact aware of the loss and potential damage the breached data can do.