Trust Wallets in a post on X said, “We’ve identified a security incident affecting Trust Wallet Browser Extension version 2.68 only. Users with Browser Extension 2.68 should disable and upgrade to 2.69.”
CZ has assured that the company is investigating how threat actors were able to compromise the new version.
Mobile-only users and browser extension versions are not impacted. User funds are SAFE,” Zhao wrote in a post on X.
The compromise happened because of a flaw in a version of the Trust Wallet Google Chrome browser extension.
If you suffered the compromise of Browser Extension v2.68, follow these steps on Trust Wallet X site:
Please wait to open the Browser Extension until you have updated to Extension version 2.69. This helps safeguard the security of your wallet and avoids possible problems.
Social media users expressed their views. One said, “The problem has been going on for several hours,” while another user complained that the company ”must explain what happened and compensate all users affected. Otherwise reputation is tarnished.” A user also asked, “How did the vulnerability in version 2.68 get past testing, and what changes are being made to prevent similar issues?”
For years, illegal online marketplaces were closely linked to the dark web. These platforms relied on privacy-focused browsers and early cryptocurrencies to sell drugs, weapons, stolen data, and hacking tools while remaining hidden from authorities. At the time, their technical complexity made them difficult to track and dismantle.
That model has now changed drastically. In 2025, some of the largest illegal crypto markets in history are operating openly on Telegram, a mainstream messaging application. According to blockchain intelligence researchers, these platforms no longer depend on sophisticated anonymity tools. Instead, they rely on encrypted chats, repeated channel relaunches after bans, and communication primarily in Chinese.
Analysis shows that Chinese-language scam-focused marketplaces on Telegram have reached an unprecedented scale. While enforcement actions earlier this year temporarily disrupted a few major platforms, activity quickly recovered through successor markets. Two of the largest currently active groups are collectively processing close to two billion dollars in cryptocurrency transactions every month.
These marketplaces function as service hubs for organized scam networks. They provide money-laundering services, sell stolen personal and financial data, host fake investment websites, and offer digital tools designed to assist fraud, including automated impersonation technologies. Researchers have also flagged listings that suggest serious human exploitation, adding to concerns about the broader harm linked to these platforms.
Their rapid growth is closely connected to large-scale crypto investment and romance scams. In these schemes, victims are gradually manipulated into transferring increasing amounts of money to fraudulent platforms. Law enforcement estimates indicate that such scams generate billions of dollars annually, making them the most financially damaging form of cybercrime. Many of these operations are reportedly run from facilities in parts of Southeast Asia where trafficked individuals are forced to carry out fraud under coercive conditions.
Compared with earlier dark web marketplaces, the difference in scale is striking. Previous platforms processed a few billion dollars over several years. By contrast, one major Telegram-based marketplace alone handled tens of billions of dollars in transactions between 2021 and 2025, making it the largest illicit online market ever documented.
Telegram has taken limited enforcement action, removing some large channels following regulatory scrutiny. However, replacement markets have repeatedly emerged, often absorbing users and transaction volumes from banned groups. Public statements from the platform indicate resistance to broad bans, citing privacy concerns and financial freedom for users.
Cryptocurrency infrastructure also plays a critical role in sustaining these markets. Most transactions rely on stablecoins, which allow fast transfers without exposure to price volatility. Analysts note that Tether is the primary stablecoin used across these platforms. Unlike decentralized cryptocurrencies, Tether is issued by a centralized company with the technical ability to freeze funds linked to criminal activity. Despite this capability, researchers observe that large volumes of illicit transactions continue to flow through these markets with limited disruption. Requests for comment sent to Tether regarding its role in these transactions did not receive a response at the time of publication.
Cybercrime experts warn that weak enforcement, fragmented regulation, and inconsistent platform accountability have created conditions where large-scale fraud operates openly. Without coordinated intervention, these markets are expected to continue expanding, increasing risks to users and the global digital economy.
Chennai, India — In a paradigm-shifting judgment that reshapes how India’s legal system views digital assets, the Madras High Court has ruled that cryptocurrencies qualify as property under Indian law. The verdict, delivered by Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, establishes that while cryptocurrencies cannot be considered legal tender, they are nonetheless assets capable of ownership, transfer, and legal protection.
Investor’s Petition Leads to Legal Precedent
The case began when an investor approached the court after her 3,532.30 XRP tokens, valued at around ₹1.98 lakh, were frozen by the cryptocurrency exchange WazirX following a major cyberattack in July 2024.
The breach targeted Ethereum and ERC-20 tokens, resulting in an estimated loss of $230 million (approximately ₹1,900 crore) and prompted the platform to impose a blanket freeze on user accounts.
The petitioner argued that her XRP holdings were unrelated to the hacked tokens and should not be subject to the same restrictions. She sought relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, requesting that Zanmai Labs Pvt. Ltd., the Indian operator of WazirX, be restrained from redistributing or reallocating her digital assets during the ongoing restructuring process.
Zanmai Labs contended that its Singapore-based parent company, Zettai Pte Ltd, was undergoing a court-supervised restructuring that required all users to share losses collectively. However, the High Court rejected this defense, observing that the petitioner’s assets were distinct from the ERC-20 tokens involved in the hack.
Justice Venkatesh ruled that the exchange could not impose collective loss-sharing on unrelated digital assets, noting that “the tokens affected by the cyberattack were ERC-20 coins, which are entirely different from the petitioner’s XRP holdings.”
Court’s Stance: Cryptocurrency as Property
In his judgment, Justice Venkatesh explained that although cryptocurrencies are intangible and do not function as physical goods or official currency, they meet the legal definition of property.
He stated that these assets “can be enjoyed, possessed, and even held in trust,” reinforcing their capability of ownership and protection under law.
To support this interpretation, the court referred to Section 2(47A) of the Income Tax Act, which classifies cryptocurrencies as Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs). This legal category recognizes digital tokens as taxable and transferable assets, strengthening the basis for treating them as property under Indian statutes.
Jurisdiction and Legal Authority
Addressing the question of jurisdiction, the High Court noted that Indian courts have the authority to protect assets located within the country, even if international proceedings are underway. Justice Venkatesh cited the Supreme Court’s 2021 ruling in PASL Wind Solutions v. GE Power Conversion India, which affirmed that Indian courts retain the right to intervene in matters involving domestic assets despite foreign arbitration.
Since the petitioner’s crypto transactions were initiated in Chennai and linked to an Indian bank account, the Madras High Court asserted complete jurisdiction to hear the dispute.
Beyond resolving the individual case, Justice Venkatesh emphasized the urgent need for robust regulatory and governance frameworks for India’s cryptocurrency ecosystem.
The judgment recommended several safeguards to protect users and maintain market integrity, including:
• Independent audits of cryptocurrency exchanges,
• Segregation of customer funds from company finances, and
• Stronger KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) compliance mechanisms.
The court underlined that as India transitions toward a Web3-driven economy, accountability, transparency, and investor protection must remain central to digital asset governance.
Impact on India’s Crypto Industry
Legal and financial experts view the judgment as a turning point in India’s treatment of digital assets.
By recognizing cryptocurrencies as property, the ruling gives investors a clearer legal foundation for ownership rights and judicial remedies in case of disputes. It also urges exchanges to improve corporate governance and adopt transparent practices when managing customer funds.
“This verdict brings long-needed clarity,” said a corporate lawyer specializing in digital finance. “It does not make crypto legal tender, but it ensures that investors’ holdings are legally recognized as assets, something the Indian market has lacked.”
The decision is expected to influence future policy discussions surrounding the Digital India Act and the government’s Virtual Digital Asset Taxation framework, both of which are likely to define how crypto businesses and investors operate in the country.
A Legally Secure Digital Future
By aligning India’s legal reasoning with international trends, the Madras High Court has placed the judiciary at the forefront of global crypto jurisprudence. Similar to rulings in the UK, Singapore, and the United States, this decision formally acknowledges that cryptocurrencies hold measurable economic value and are capable of legal protection.
While the ruling does not alter the Reserve Bank of India’s stance that cryptocurrencies are not legal currency, it does mark a decisive step toward legal maturity in digital asset regulation.
It signals a future where blockchain-based assets will coexist within a structured legal framework, allowing innovation and investor protection to advance together.
Canadian police have shut down the cryptocurrency trading platform TradeOgre and seized digital assets valued at more than $40 million USD, marking both the country’s largest cryptocurrency seizure and the first time a crypto exchange has been dismantled by national law enforcement.
A Platform Built on Anonymity
TradeOgre was a small but notable exchange that allowed users to trade niche digital currencies, including Monero, which is popular for its privacy features. The platform stood out for avoiding Know Your Customer (KYC) checks, meaning people could open accounts without providing identification. According to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), TradeOgre also failed to register as a money services business with FINTRAC, Canada’s financial watchdog. These gaps made the exchange appealing to those seeking anonymity but also raised red flags for regulators.
The case began in June 2024, when Canada’s Money Laundering Investigative Team (MLIT) opened a probe after receiving intelligence from Europol. Investigators relied on blockchain tracing tools to track wallet activity linked to the platform. In July 2024, TradeOgre suddenly went offline without any announcement from its operators, fueling rumors among users that it had carried out an “exit scam.” Authorities later confirmed that the takedown was part of their enforcement action.
Why Authorities Took Action
The RCMP said TradeOgre was operating illegally in Canada because it was unregistered and allowed anonymous trading. Investigators suspect the site was used by criminals to launder illicit funds, taking advantage of Monero and other privacy-focused coins. However, officials stressed that not all customer funds were necessarily linked to crime.
In a statement, the RCMP clarified that they could not confirm whether the seized assets came from specific crimes such as extortion. They also noted that details about the exact sources of the money could not be released at this stage.
Fallout and Reactions
The sudden seizure left many users cut off from their funds. Some, including well-known crypto community members like Taylor Monahan of MetaMask, criticized the move, arguing that innocent users had their assets frozen without warning. “Very much looking forward to seeing the evidence… and for you to provide recourse to ALL innocent parties,” Monahan wrote on social media.
The RCMP responded that individuals who believe their funds were legitimate may seek remedies through the Canadian court system if the assets are subject to forfeiture proceedings. The agency added that any inquiries about the seized cryptocurrency should be directed to the MLIT.
A Warning for Crypto Users
Authorities emphasized that this case shows the risks of using unregulated exchanges. While anonymity may appeal to some traders, platforms that avoid oversight expose customers to legal uncertainty, sudden shutdowns, and loss of access to funds.
CEO Cyrus Fazel said that an external finance wallet of a partner was compromised. The incident happened due to hacking of the partner’s API, a process that lets software customers communicate with each other, impacting a single counterparty. It was not a compromise of SwissBorg, the company said on X.
SwissBorg said that the hack has impacted fewer than 1% of users. “A partner API was compromised, impacting our SOL Earn Program (~193k SOL, <1% of users). Rest assured, the SwissBorg app remains fully secure and all other funds in Earn programs are 100% safe,” it tweeted. The company said they are looking into the incident with other blockchain security firms.
All other assets are secure and will compensate for any losses, and user balances in the SwissBorg app are not impacted. SOL Earn redemptions have been stopped as recovery efforts are undergoing. The company has also teamed up with law enforcement agencies to recover the stolen funds. A detailed report will be released after the investigations end.
The exploit surfaced after a surge in crypto thefts, with more than $2.17 billion already stolen this year. Kiln, the partner company, released its own statement: “SwissBorg and Kiln are investigating an incident that may have involved unauthorized access to a wallet used for staking operations. The incident resulted in Solana funds being improperly removed from the wallet used for staking operations.”
After the attack, “SwissBorg and Kiln immediately activated an incident response plan, contained the activity, and engaged our security partners,” it said in a blogpost, and that “SwissBorg has paused Solana staking transactions on the platform to ensure no other customers are impacted.”
Fazel posted a video about the incident, informing users that the platform had suffered multiple breaches in the past.