Nearly Two Billion Discord Messages Scraped and Sold on Dark Web Forums
Discord, a platform widely used for gaming, social communities, and professional groups, enables users to connect via text, voice, and video across servers organized around different interests. Many of these servers are open to the public, meaning their content—including usernames, conversations, and community activity—can be accessed by anyone who joins. While much of this information is publicly visible, the large-scale automated scraping of data still violates Discord’s Terms of Service and could potentially breach data protection regulations such as the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or California’s Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).
The true sensitivity of the dataset remains unclear, as no full forensic analysis has been conducted. It is possible that a significant portion of the messages and voice records were collected from publicly accessible servers, which would reduce—but not eliminate—the privacy concerns. However, the act of compiling, distributing, and selling this information at scale introduces new risks, such as the misuse of user data for surveillance, targeted phishing, or identity exploitation.
Discord has faced similar challenges before. In April 2024, a service known as Spy.Pet attempted to sell billions of archived chat logs from the platform. That operation was swiftly shut down by Discord, which banned the associated accounts and confirmed that the activity violated its rules. At the time, the company emphasized that automated scraping and self-botting were not permitted under its Terms of Service and stated it was exploring possible legal action against offenders.
The recurrence of large-scale scraping attempts highlights the ongoing tension between the open nature of platforms like Discord and the privacy expectations of their users. While public servers are designed for accessibility and community growth, they can also be exploited by malicious actors seeking to harvest data en masse. Even if the information being sold in the latest case is largely public, the potential to cross-reference user activity across communities raises broader concerns about surveillance and abuse.
As of now, Discord has not issued an official statement on this latest incident, but based on previous responses, it is likely the company will take steps to disrupt the sale and enforce its policies against scraping. The incident serves as another reminder that users on open platforms should remain mindful of the visibility of their activity and that service providers must continue to balance openness with strong protections against data misuse.
