Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

About Me

Showing posts with label Instagram. Show all posts

Beware of Pig Butchering Scams That Steal Your Money

Beware of Pig Butchering Scams That Steal Your Money

Pig butchering, a term we usually hear in the meat market, sadly, has also become a lethal form of cybercrime that can cause complete financial losses for the victims. 

Pig Butchering is a “form of investment fraud in the crypto space where scammers build relationships with targets through social engineering and then lure them to invest crypto in fake opportunities or platforms created by the scammer,” according to The Department of Financial Protection & Innovation. 

Pig butchering has squeezed billions of dollars from victims globally. Cambodian-based Huione Group gang stole over $4 billion from August 2021 to January 2025, the New York Post reported.

How to stay safe from pig butchering?

Individuals should watch out for certain things to avoid getting caught in these extortion schemes. Scammers often target seniors and individuals who are not well aware about cybercrime. The National Council on Aging cautions that such scams begin with receiving messages from scammers pretending to be someone else. Never respond or send money to random people who text you online, even if the story sounds compelling. Scammers rely on earning your trust, a sob story is one easy way for them to trick you. 

Another red flag is receiving SMS or social media texts that send you to other platforms like WeChat or Telegram, which have fewer regulations. Scammers also convince users to invest their money, which they claim to return with big profits. In one incident, the scammer even asked the victim to “go to a loan shark” to get the money.

Stopping scammers

Last year, Meta blocked over 2 million accounts that were promoting crypto investment scams such as pig butchering. Businesses have increased efforts to combat this issue, but the problem still very much exists. A major step is raising awareness via public posts broadcasting safety tips among individuals to prevent them from falling prey to such scams. 

Organizations have now started releasing warnings in Instagram DMs and Facebook Messenger warning users about “potentially suspicious interactions or cold outreach from people you don’t know”, which is a good initiative. Banks have started tipping of customers about the dangers of scams when sending money online. 

Florida Scraps Controversial Law That Threatened Online Privacy

 



A proposed law in Florida that raised concerns about online privacy has now been officially dropped. The bill, called “Social Media Use by Minors,” aimed to place tighter controls on how children use social media. While it was introduced to protect young users, many experts argued it would have done more harm than good — not just for kids, but for all internet users.

One major issue with the bill was its demand for social media platforms to change how they protect users’ messages. Apps like WhatsApp, Signal, iMessage, and Instagram use something called end-to-end encryption. This feature makes messages unreadable to anyone except the person you're talking to. Not even the app itself can access the content.

The bill, however, would have required these platforms to create a special way for authorities to unlock private messages if they had a legal order. But cybersecurity professionals have long said that once such a "backdoor" exists, it can't be safely limited to just the police. Criminals, hackers, or even foreign spies could find and misuse it. Creating a backdoor for some means weakening protection for all.

The bill also included other rules, like banning temporary or disappearing messages for children and letting parents view everything their child does on social media. Critics worried this would put young users at greater risk, especially those needing privacy in situations like abuse or bullying.

Even though the Florida Senate passed the bill, the House of Representatives refused to approve it. On May 3, 2025, the bill was officially removed from further discussion. Digital privacy advocates, such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation, welcomed this move, calling it a step in the right direction for protecting online privacy.

This isn’t the first time governments have tried and failed to weaken encryption. Similar efforts have been blocked in other parts of the world, like France and the European Union, for the same reason: once secure messaging is weakened, it puts everyone at risk.

For now, users in Florida can breathe a sigh of relief. The bill’s failure shows growing recognition of how vital strong encryption is in keeping our personal information safe online.

Meta Removes Independent Fact Checkers, Replaces With "Community Notes"


Meta to remove fact-checkers

Meta is dumping independent fact-checkers on Instagram and Facebook, similar to what X (earlier Twitter) did, replacing them with “community notes” where users’ comments decide the accuracy of a post.

On Tuesday, Mark Zuckerberg in a video said third-party moderators were "too politically biased" and it was "time to get back to our roots around free expression".

Tech executives are trying to build better relations with the new US President Donald Trump who will take oath this month, the new move is a step in that direction.  

Republican Party and Meta

The Republican party and Trump have called out Meta for its fact-checking policies, stressing it censors right-wing voices on its platform.

After the new policy was announced, Trump said in a news conference he was pleased with Meta’s decision to have  "come a long way".

Online anti-hate speech activists expressed disappointment with the shift, claiming it was motivated by a desire to align with Trump.

“Zuckerberg's announcement is a blatant attempt to cozy up to the incoming Trump administration – with harmful implications. Claiming to avoid "censorship" is a political move to avoid taking responsibility for hate and disinformation that platforms encourage and facilitate,” said Ava Lee of Global Witness. This organization sees itself as trying to bring big tech like Meta accountable.

Copying X

The present fact-checking program of Meta was introduced in 2016, it sends posts that seem false or misleading to independent fact-checking organizations to judge their credibility. 

Posts marked as misleading have labels attached to them, giving users more information, and move down in viewers’ social media feeds. This will now be replaced by community notes, starting in the US. Meta has no “immediate plans” to remove third-party fact-checkers in the EU or the UK.

The new community notes move has been copied from platform X, which was started after Elon Musk bought Twitter. 

It includes people with opposing opinions agreeing on notes that provide insight or explanation to disputed posts. 

We will allow more speech by lifting restrictions on some topics that are part of mainstream discourse and focusing our enforcement on illegal and high-severity violations. We will take a more personalized approach to political content, so that people who want to see more of it in their feeds can.

Why Did Turkey Suddenly Ban Instagram? The Shocking Reason Revealed


 

On Friday, Turkey's Information and Communication Technologies Authority (ICTA) unexpectedly blocked Instagram access across the country. The ICTA, responsible for overseeing internet regulations, did not provide any specific reason for the ban. However, according to reports from Yeni Safak, a newspaper supportive of the government, the ban was likely a response to Instagram removing posts by Turkish users that expressed condolences for Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh's death.

Many Turkish users faced difficulties accessing Instagram following the ban. Fahrettin Altun, the communications director for the Turkish presidency, publicly condemned Instagram, accusing it of censoring messages of sympathy for Haniyeh, whom he called a martyr. This incident has sparked significant controversy within Turkey.

Haniyeh’s Death and Its Aftermath

Ismail Haniyeh, the political leader of Hamas and a close associate of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, was killed in an attack in Tehran on Wednesday, an act allegedly carried out by Israel. His death prompted widespread reactions in Turkey, with many taking to social media to express their condolences and solidarity, leading to the conflict with Instagram.

A History of Social Media Restrictions in Turkey

This is not the first instance of social media restrictions in Turkey. The country, with a population of 85 million, includes over 50 million Instagram users, making such bans highly impactful. From April 2017 to January 2020, Turkey blocked access to Wikipedia due to articles that linked the Turkish government to extremism, tellingly limiting the flow of information.

This recent action against Instagram is part of a broader pattern of conflicts between the Turkish government and social media companies. In April, Meta, the parent company of Facebook, had to suspend its Threads network in Turkey after authorities blocked its information sharing with Instagram. This surfaces ongoing tensions between Turkey and major social media firms.

The blockage of Instagram illustrates the persistent struggle between the Turkish government and social media platforms over content regulation and freedom of expression. These restrictions pose crucial challenges to the dissemination of information and public discourse, affecting millions who rely on these platforms for news and communication. 

Turkey's decision to block Instagram is a testament to the complex dynamics between the government and digital platforms. As the situation pertains, it will be essential to observe the responses from both Turkish authorities and the affected social media companies to grasp the broader implications for digital communication and freedom of speech in Turkey.


EU Claims Meta’s Paid Ad-Free Option Violates Digital Competition Rules

 

European Union regulators have accused Meta Platforms of violating the bloc’s new digital competition rules by compelling Facebook and Instagram users to either view ads or pay to avoid them. This move comes as part of Meta’s strategy to comply with Europe's stringent data privacy regulations.

Starting in November, Meta began offering European users the option to pay at least 10 euros ($10.75) per month for ad-free versions of Facebook and Instagram. This was in response to a ruling by the EU’s top court, which mandated that Meta must obtain user consent before displaying targeted ads, a decision that jeopardized Meta’s business model of personalized advertising.

The European Commission, the EU’s executive body, stated that preliminary findings from its investigation indicate that Meta’s “pay or consent” model breaches the Digital Markets Act (DMA) of the 27-nation bloc. According to the commission, Meta’s approach fails to provide users the right to “freely consent” to the use of their personal data across its various services for personalized ads.

The commission also criticized Meta for not offering a less personalized service that is equivalent to its social networks. Meta responded by stating that their subscription model for no ads aligns with the direction of the highest court in Europe and complies with the DMA. The company expressed its intent to engage in constructive dialogue with the European Commission to resolve the investigation.

The investigation was launched soon after the DMA took effect in March, aiming to prevent tech “gatekeepers” from dominating digital markets through heavy financial penalties. One of the DMA's objectives is to reduce the power of Big Tech firms that have amassed vast amounts of personal data, giving them an advantage over competitors in online advertising and social media services. The commission suggested that Meta should offer an option that doesn’t rely on extensive personal data sharing for advertising purposes.

European Commissioner Thierry Breton, who oversees the bloc’s digital policy, emphasized that the DMA aims to empower users to decide how their data is used and to ensure that innovative companies can compete fairly with tech giants regarding data access.

Meta now has the opportunity to respond to the commission’s findings, with the investigation due to conclude by March 2025. The company could face fines of up to 10% of its annual global revenue, potentially amounting to billions of euros. Under the DMA, Meta is classified as one of seven online gatekeepers, with Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger, and its online ad business listed among two dozen “core platform services” that require the highest level of regulatory scrutiny.

This accusation against Meta is part of a series of regulatory actions by Brussels against major tech companies. Recently, the EU charged Apple with preventing app makers from directing users to cheaper options outside its App Store and accused Microsoft of violating antitrust laws by bundling its Teams app with its Office software.


Meta to Train AI with Public Facebook and Instagram Posts

 


 

Meta, the company behind Facebook and Instagram, is set to begin using public posts from European users to train its artificial intelligence (AI) systems starting June 26. This decision has sparked discussions about privacy and GDPR compliance.

Utilising Public Data for AI

European users of Facebook and Instagram have recently been notified that their public posts could be used to help develop Meta's AI technologies. The information that might be utilised includes posts, photos, captions, and messages sent to an AI, but private messages are excluded. Meta has emphasised that only public data from user profiles will be used, and data from users under 18 will not be included.

GDPR Compliance and Legitimate Interest

Under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), companies can process personal data if they demonstrate a legitimate interest. Meta argues that improving AI systems constitutes such an interest. Despite this, users have the right to opt out of having their data used for this purpose by submitting a form through Facebook or Instagram, although these forms are currently unavailable.

Even if users opt out, their data may still be used if they are featured in another user's public posts or images. Meta has provided a four-week notice period before collecting data to comply with privacy regulations.

Regulatory Concerns and Delays

The Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) intervened following Meta's announcement, resulting in a temporary delay. The DPC requested clarifications from Meta, which the company has addressed. Meta assured that only public data from EU users would be utilized and confirmed that data from minors would not be included.

Meta’s AI Development Efforts

Meta is heavily investing in AI research and development. The company’s latest large language model, Llama 3, released in April, powers its Meta AI assistant, though it is not yet available in Europe. Meta has previously used public posts to train its AI assistant but did not include this data in training the Llama 2 model.

In addition to developing AI software, Meta is also working on the hardware needed for AI operations, introducing custom-made chips last month.

Meta's initiative to use public posts for AI training highlights the ongoing balance between innovation and privacy. While an opt-out option is provided, its current unavailability and the potential use of data from non-consenting users underscore the complexities of data privacy.

European users should remain informed about their rights under GDPR and utilize the opt-out process when available. Despite some limitations, Meta's efforts to notify users and offer an opt-out reflect a step towards balancing technological advancement with privacy concerns.

This development represents a striking move in Meta's AI journey and accentuates the critical role of transparency and regulatory oversight in handling personal data responsibly.


Heightened Hacking Activity Prompts Social Media Security Warning

 


Having social media software for managing users' privacy settings, and security settings, and keeping track of recent news and marketing opportunities can provide a great way to keep in touch with family, and friends, and stay updated on recent news. However, it is important to abide by these settings to keep information safe. 

When social media is used improperly, it can introduce several risks to a person's personal information, as online criminals are devising new and in-depth methods for exploiting vulnerabilities more frequently than ever before. There are many things users need to know about keeping their Facebook, X and Instagram accounts secure - from finding out how accounts are hacked, to recovering accounts. 

When fraudsters gain access to the details of the users' accounts, they can take advantage of their contacts, sell their information on the dark web, and steal the identity of the users. According to reports by Action Fraud, some victims of email and social media hacking have been forced into extortion by criminals who have stolen their private photos and videos and used them to extort them. 9 out of 10 of the people who participated in the survey (89%) stated that they knew or were aware of people whose profiles had been compromised, and 28% said they knew at least five to ten people who had been hacked. 

The survey found that 15 per cent of the respondents knew someone who was hacked on social media more than ten times. With 76% of respondents indicating they have increased concerns within the last year compared to the previous year, it appears that the fears are growing. What scammers do to hack accounts Online users' accounts can be accessed in a variety of ways by fraudsters to gain access to their money. 

The hacked account user may be wondering how they managed to gain access to one of their accounts if they discover that one of theirs has been hacked. There are times when hackers gain access to a system which carries highly confidential data about a person and causes the system to be breached. This information is then used by fraudsters to gain access to accounts that have been compromised. 

Phishing attacks are designed to entice users into divulging their details by impersonating legitimate companies and containing links that lead them to malicious websites that can harvest their data. As a result, users may end up downloading malicious code to the devices they use to steal their information once they enter the information on the website. 

A chain hack which takes place on a social media platform involves a fraudster posting links to dubious websites in the comment section of a post. After the victim clicks on the link, the fraudster will then ask them to enter their social media account details. This will allow the fraudster access to the victim's account information. It has been reported that fraudsters are known to send messages to victims impersonating one of their contacts in an attempt to get them to share their two-factor authentication code with them. 

Hackers who use credentials they have previously been successful in obtaining access to other accounts belonging to a particular person are known as credential stuffers. When a scammer watches a user log into an account while an account is being used, they are shoulder surfing the user. It is possible to download a malicious app to the users' phones, which will, in turn, install malware onto their devices, enabling the fraudster to steal the username and password for their account and use it to steal users' money. 

When users' accounts have been hacked, take precautions to avoid recovery scammers contacting them on social media and saying they can retrieve their accounts for them if only they would follow their instructions. This is just another scam that they cannot fall victim to, and they would not be able to do this. 

Find out who to contact to get help with a hacked account by going to the help page of the account provider. All devices must be logged out of the users' accounts as well as their passwords must be changed on all devices. Please examine to ascertain the presence of any newly instituted protocols or configurations within users' email accounts, which may have been established without their explicit authorization. 

These modifications could potentially dictate the redirection of emails about their accounts. It is incumbent upon users to promptly notify their contacts of a potential security breach and advise them to exercise caution, as any received messages may not be legitimately sent by them.

Mark Zuckerberg Apologizes to Families in Fiery US Senate Hearing

Mark Zuckerberg Apologizes to Families in Fiery US Senate Hearing

In a recent US Senate hearing, Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta (formerly Facebook), faced intense scrutiny over the impact of social media platforms on children. Families who claimed their children had been harmed by online content were present, and emotions ran high throughout the proceedings.

The Apology and Its Context

Zuckerberg's apology came after families shared heartbreaking stories of self-harm and suicide related to social media content. The hearing focused on protecting children online, and it provided a rare opportunity for US senators to question tech executives directly. Other CEOs, including those from TikTok, Snap, X (formerly Twitter), and Discord, were also in the hot seat.

The central theme was clear: How can we ensure the safety and well-being of young users in the digital age? The families' pain and frustration underscored the urgency of this question.

The Instagram Prompt and Child Sexual Abuse Material

One important topic during the hearing was an Instagram prompt related to child sexual abuse material. Zuckerberg acknowledged that the prompt was a mistake and expressed regret. The prompt mistakenly directed users to search for explicit content when they typed certain keywords. This incident raised concerns about the effectiveness of content moderation algorithms and the need for continuous improvement.

Zuckerberg defended the importance of free expression but also recognized the responsibility that comes with it. He emphasized the need to strike a balance between allowing diverse viewpoints and preventing harm. The challenge lies in identifying harmful content without stifling legitimate discourse.

Directing Users Toward Helpful Resources

During his testimony, Zuckerberg highlighted efforts to guide users toward helpful resources. When someone searches for self-harm-related content, Instagram now directs them to resources that promote mental health and well-being. While imperfect, this approach reflects a commitment to mitigating harm.

The Role of Parents and Educators

Zuckerberg encouraged parents to engage with their children about online safety and set boundaries. He acknowledged that technology companies cannot solve these issues alone; collaboration with schools and communities is essential.

Mark Zuckerberg's apology was a significant moment, but it cannot be the end. Protecting children online requires collective action from tech companies, policymakers, parents, and educators. We must continue to address the challenges posed by social media while fostering a healthy digital environment for the next generation.

As the hearing concluded, the families' pain remained palpable. Their stories serve as a stark reminder that behind every statistic and algorithm lies a real person—a child seeking connection, validation, and safety.