Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Showing posts with label Location. Show all posts

Apple's New Feature Will Help Users Restrict Location Data


Apple has introduced a new privacy feature that allows users to restrict the accuracy of location data shared with cellular networks on a few iPad models and iPhone. 

About the feature

The “Limit Precise Location” feature will start after updating to iOS26.3 or later. It restricts the information that mobile carriers use to decide locations through cell tower connections. Once turned on, cellular networks can only detect the device’s location, like neighbourhood instead of accurate street address. 

According to Apple, “The precise location setting doesn't impact the precision of the location data that is shared with emergency responders during an emergency call.” “This setting affects only the location data available to cellular networks. It doesn't impact the location data that you share with apps through Location Services. For example, it has no impact on sharing your location with friends and family with Find My.”

Users can turn on the feature by opening “Settings,” selecting “Cellular,” “Cellular Data Options,” and clicking the “Limit Precise Location” setting. After turning on limited precise location, the device may trigger a device restart to complete activation. 

The privacy enhancement feature works only on iPhone Air, iPad Pro (M5) Wi-Fi + Cellular variants running on iOS 26.3 or later. 

Where will it work?

The availability of this feature will depend on carrier support. The mobile networks compatible are:

EE and BT in the UK

Boost Mobile in the UK

Telecom in Germany 

AIS and True in Thailand 

Apple hasn't shared the reason for introducing this feature yet.

Compatibility of networks with the new feature 

Apple's new privacy feature, which is currently only supported by a small number of networks, is a significant step towards ensuring that carriers can only collect limited data on their customers' movements and habits because cellular networks can easily track device locations via tower connections for network operations.

“Cellular networks can determine your location based on which cell towers your device connects to. The limit precise location setting enhances your location privacy by reducing the precision of location data available to cellular networks,”

Indian Government Proposes Compulsory Location Tracking in Smartphones, Faces Backlash


Government faces backlash over location-tracking proposal

The Indian government is pushing a telecom industry proposal that will compel smartphone companies to allow satellite location tracking that will be activated 24x7 for surveillance. 

Tech giants Samsung, Google, and Apple have opposed this move due to privacy concerns. Privacy debates have stirred in India after the government was forced to repeal an order that mandated smartphone companies to pre-install a state run cyber safety application on all devices. Activists and opposition raised concerns about possible spying. 

About the proposal 

Recently, the government had been concerned that agencies didn't get accurate locations when legal requests were sent to telecom companies during investigations. Currently, the firm only uses cellular tower data that provides estimated area location, this can be sometimes inaccurate.

The Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) representing Bharti Airtel and Reliance Jio suggested accurate user locations be provided if the government mandates smartphone firms to turn on A-GPS technology which uses cellular data and satellite signals.

Strong opposition from tech giants 

If this is implemented, location services will be activated in smartphones with no disable option. Samsung, Google, and Apple strongly oppose this proposal. A proposal to track user location is not present anywhere else in the world, according to lobbying group India Cellular & Electronics Association (ICEA), representing Google and Apple. 

Reuters reached out to the India's IT and home ministries for clarity on the telecom industry's proposal but have received no replies. According to digital forensics expert Junade Ali, the "proposal would see phones operate as a dedicated surveillance device." 

According to technology experts, utilizing A-GPS technology, which is normally only activated when specific apps are operating or emergency calls are being made, might give authorities location data accurate enough to follow a person to within a meter.  

Telecom vs government 

Globally, governments are constantly looking for new ways to improve in tracking the movements or data of mobile users. All Russian mobile phones are mandated to have a state-sponsored communications app installed. With 735 million smartphones as of mid-2025, India is the second-largest mobile market in the world. 

According to Counterpoint Research, more than 95% of these gadgets are running Google's Android operating system, while the remaining phones are running Apple's iOS. 

Apple and Google cautioned that their user base will include members of the armed forces, judges, business executives, and journalists, and that the proposed location tracking would jeopardize their security because they store sensitive data.

According to the telecom industry, even the outdated method of location tracking is becoming troublesome because smartphone manufacturers notify users via pop-up messages that their "carrier is trying to access your location."



Why Cybersecurity is Critical for Protecting Spatial Data



In a world where almost every service depends on digital connections, one type of information underpins much of our daily lives: spatial data. This data links activities to a place and time, revealing not just “where” something happens, but also “when,” “how,” and sometimes even “why.” Its importance spans a wide range of fields, including transportation, agriculture, climate science, disaster management, urban planning, and national security.


The power of spatial data

Spatial data is collected constantly by satellites, GPS receivers, drones, advanced sensors, and connected devices. Combined with 5G networks, cloud platforms, and artificial intelligence, this information is transformed from raw coordinates into actionable insights. It enables predictive models, smart city planning, and digital twins, virtual copies of physical systems that simulate real-world conditions. In short, spatial data is no longer static; it drives decisions in real time.


The security challenges

Its value, however, makes it a prime target for cyber threats. Three major risks stand out:

Loss of confidentiality: Unauthorized access to location data can expose sensitive details, from an individual’s daily routine to the supply routes of critical industries. This creates openings for stalking, fraud, corporate espionage, and even threats to national security.

Manipulation of data: One of the most dangerous scenarios is GPS spoofing, where attackers send fake signals to alter a device’s calculated position. If navigation systems on ships, aircraft, or autonomous vehicles are misled, the consequences can be catastrophic.

Denial of access: When spatial services are disrupted through jamming signals or cyberattacks: emergency responders, airlines, and logistics companies may be forced to halt operations. In some cases, entire networks have been shut down for days to contain breaches.

Securing spatial data requires a mix of governance, technical safeguards, and intelligence-led defences. Organizations must classify datasets by their sensitivity, since the location of a retail outlet carries far less risk than the coordinates of critical infrastructure. Training specialists to handle spatial data responsibly is equally important.

On the technical front, strong encryption, strict access controls, and continuous monitoring are basic necessities. Integrity checks and tamper detection can ensure that location records remain accurate, while well-tested recovery plans help reduce downtime in case of an incident.

Finally, intelligence-driven security shifts the focus from reacting to threats to anticipating them. By analysing attacker behaviour and emerging vulnerabilities, organizations can strengthen weak points in advance. Privacy-preserving techniques such as masking or differential privacy allow data to be used without exposing individuals. At the same time, technologies like blockchain add tamper resistance, and AI tools help detect anomalies at scale.

Spatial data has the power to make societies more efficient, resilient, and sustainable. But without strong cybersecurity, its benefits can quickly turn into risks. Recognizing its vulnerabilities and implementing layered protections is no longer optional, it is the only way to ensure that this valuable resource continues to serve people safely.



Why Location Data Privacy Laws Are Urgently Needed

 

Your location data is more than a simple point on a map—it’s a revealing digital fingerprint. It can show where you live, where you work, where you worship, and even where you access healthcare. In today’s hyper-connected environment, these movements are silently collected, packaged, and sold to the highest bidder. For those seeking reproductive or gender-affirming care, attending protests, or visiting immigration clinics, this data can become a dangerous weapon.

Last year, privacy advocates raised urgent concerns, calling on lawmakers to address the risks posed by unchecked location tracking technologies. These tools are now increasingly used to surveil and criminalize individuals for accessing fundamental services like reproductive healthcare.

There is hope. States such as California, Massachusetts, and Illinois are now moving forward with legislation designed to limit the misuse of this data and protect individuals from digital surveillance. These bills aim to preserve the right to privacy and ensure safe access to healthcare and other essential rights.

Imagine a woman in Alabama—where abortion is entirely banned—dropping her children at daycare and driving to Florida for a clinic visit. She uses a GPS app to navigate and a free radio app along the way. Without her knowledge, the apps track her entire route, which is then sold by a data broker. Privacy researchers demonstrated how this could happen using Locate X, a tool developed by Babel Street, which mapped a user’s journey from Alabama to Florida.

Despite its marketing as a law enforcement tool, Locate X was accessed by private investigators who falsely claimed affiliation with authorities. This loophole highlights the deeply flawed nature of current data protections and how they can be exploited by anyone posing as law enforcement.

The data broker ecosystem remains largely unregulated, enabling a range of actors—from law enforcement to ideological groups—to access and weaponize this information. Near Intelligence, a broker, reportedly sold location data from visitors to Planned Parenthood to an anti-abortion organization. Meanwhile, in Idaho, cell phone location data was used to charge a mother and her son with aiding an abortion, proving how this data can be misused not only against patients but also those supporting them.

The Massachusetts bill proposes a protected zone of 1,850 feet around sensitive locations, while California takes a broader stance with a five-mile radius. These efforts are gaining support from privacy advocates, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

“A ‘permissible purpose’ (which is key to the minimization rule) should be narrowly defined to include only: (1) delivering a product or service that the data subject asked for, (2) fulfilling an order, (3) complying with federal or state law, or (4) responding to an imminent threat to life.”

Time and again, we’ve seen location data weaponized to monitor immigrants, LGBTQ+ individuals, and those seeking reproductive care. In response, state legislatures are advancing bills focused on curbing this misuse. These proposals are grounded in long-standing privacy principles such as informed consent and data minimization—ensuring that only necessary data is collected and stored securely.

These laws don’t just protect residents. They also give peace of mind to travelers from other states, allowing them to exercise their rights without fear of being tracked, surveilled, or retaliated against.

To help guide new legislation, this post outlines essential recommendations for protecting communities through smart policy design. These include:
  • Strong definitions,
  • Clear rules,
  • Affirmation that all location data is sensitive,
  • Empowerment of consumers through a strong private right of action,
  • Prohibition of “pay-for-privacy” schemes, and
  • Transparency through clear privacy policies.
These protections are not just legal reforms—they’re necessary steps toward reclaiming control over our digital movements and ensuring no one is punished for seeking care, support, or safety.

FTC Stops Data Brokers from Unlawful User Location Tracking

FTC Stops Data Brokers from Unlawful User Location Tracking


Data Brokers Accused of Illegal User Tracking

The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has filed actions against two US-based data brokers for allegedly engaging in illegal tracking of users' location data. The data was reportedly used to trace individuals in sensitive locations such as hospitals, churches, military bases, and other protected areas. It was then sold for purposes including advertising, political campaigns, immigration enforcement, and government use.

Mobilewalla's Allegations

The Georgia-based data broker, Mobilewalla, has been accused of tracking residents of domestic abuse shelters and protestors during the George Floyd demonstrations in 2020. According to the FTC, Mobilewalla allegedly attempted to identify protestors’ racial identities by tracing their smartphones. The company’s actions raise serious privacy and ethical concerns.

Gravy Analytics and Venntel's Accusations

The FTC also suspects Gravy Analytics and its subsidiary Venntel of misusing customer location data without consent. Reports indicate they used this data to “unfairly infer health decisions and religious beliefs,” as highlighted by TechCrunch. These actions have drawn criticism for their potential to exploit sensitive personal information.

Unlawful Data Collection Practices

The FTC revealed that Gravy Analytics collected over 17 billion location signals from more than 1 billion smartphones daily. The data was allegedly sold to federal law enforcement agencies such as the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, stated, “Surreptitious surveillance by data brokers undermines our civil liberties and puts servicemembers, union workers, religious minorities, and others at risk. This is the FTC’s fourth action this year challenging the sale of sensitive location data, and it’s past time for the industry to get serious about protecting Americans’ privacy.”

FTC's Settlements

As part of two settlements announced by the FTC, Mobilewalla and Gravy Analytics will cease collecting sensitive location data from customers. They are also required to delete the historical data they have amassed about millions of Americans over time.

The settlements mandate that the companies establish a sensitive location data program to identify and restrict tracking and disclosing customer information from specific locations. These protected areas include religious organizations, medical facilities, schools, and other sensitive sites.

Additionally, the FTC’s order requires the companies to maintain a supplier assessment program to ensure consumers have provided consent for the collection and use of data that reveals their precise location or mobile device information.

Quantum Navigation as the Successor to GPS

 


The cause of the recent flight cancellations by Finnair planes flying into Estonia did not have anything to do with mechanical failures or bad weather the cause was the GPS signal not being received by the aircraft. To prevent GPS denial, an aircraft deliberately interferes with the navigation signals that it relies on as part of its navigation. 

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) has been providing maps of areas where GPS is unavailable or unreliable for a long time, and this is not a new phenomenon. Although GPS jamming and spoofing are becoming increasingly powerful weapons of economic and strategic influence around Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, there is growing concern as conflict spreads quickly across these regions.

In some conflict zones, it has been documented that adversarial nations have used false (spoofed) GPS signals to disrupt air transit, shipping, trade, or military logistics and disrupt the daily activities of the nation. There have also been recent talks about anti-satellite weapons, and these discussions have rekindled fears that deliberate actions may be planned to disrupt GPS systems to wreak havoc on the economy. So many aspects of people's lives cannot function without GPS, and they do not even think about it when they do not have it. 

In case of a GPS outage, many online services will not function properly (these rely on GPS-based network synchronization) as well as the in-vehicle Satnav not working. On the other hand, users' mobile phones will not be able to access location-based services. According to studies conducted in the United States and the United Kingdom over the past few years, An analysis by two different academic institutions recently identified that the cost of a temporary outage in economic terms was about $1 billion per day. 

However, the strategic impacts could be even greater, especially during times of war.  As the saying goes, infantry win battles, but logistics win wars, and this is a testament to this assertion. The concept that it would be almost impossible to operate military logistics supply chains without GPS, given the heavy dependence on synchronized communication networks, general command and control, and locating and tracking vehicles and materials, is almost impossible to imagine. 

The entire system relies on GPS-based information and is susceptible to disruptions in any of them at any time. Most of the large military and commercial ships as well as aircraft carry GPS backup systems for steering since it was not long ago that navigation was performed without GPS. At high latitudes and underwater, GPS signals are not always available in all settings-for example, underground and underwater. 

It has been found that GPS alternatives depend on signals that can be measured locally (for example, motion or magnetic fields, such as the magnetic field in a compass), meaning that a vessel can navigate even in the absence of GPS or if GPS cannot be trusted at all. Inertial navigation, for example, uses special accelerometers that measure the movement of the vehicle, in a similar way to how one of those in a user's mobile phone can reorient itself when rotated in a certain direction. 

Then, based on the data users notice that the vehicle is moving, and using Newton's laws, users can calculate their likely position after a considerable period. In another technique called "alt-PNT," measurements are made of magnetic and gravitational fields to determine whether the Earth's surface is different from the known variation of these fields. Certainly! Here is the expanded and formalized version of the provided paragraphs. Reliable GPS is approaching its technological limits, and emerging quantum technologies present a promising path forward. 

Ultrastable locally deployed clocks are a key component of these advancements, ensuring that communications networks remain synchronized even during GPS outages. Traditionally, communications networks relied on GPS timing signals for synchronization. However, quantum technology offers a robust alternative. At the core of this technological shift is the fundamental behaviour of atoms. 

Satellite navigation systems depend on signals reflected from space, whereas quantum navigation leverages the precise movement of a single atom tracked under cryogenic conditions. According to New Atlas, a leading science publication, quantum navigation systems operate independently within each vehicle, with measurements taken at the point of use. This method ensures that the signal remains stable and resistant to interception, as noted by Richard Claridge, a physicist at PA Consulting Group. In May, the United Kingdom conducted two distinct quantum navigation tests one aboard a Royal Navy ship and another on a small jet plane. 

Subsequently, in June, London's underground transport system served as a testing ground for this cutting-edge technology. These tests demonstrated that quantum navigation systems are resistant to jamming, underscoring the UK's pioneering role in the future deployment of this technology on a broader scale. Quantum sensors exploit the immutable laws of nature to detect previously inaccessible signals, providing unprecedented sensitivity and stability. 

Consequently, quantum-assured navigation systems offer a reliable defence against GPS outages and enable innovative new missions. The most advanced quantum navigation systems integrate multiple sensors, each detecting unique environmental signals pertinent to navigation. This approach mirrors the technology used in autonomous vehicles, which combines lidar, cameras, ultrasonic detectors, and other sensors to achieve optimal performance. The evolution of navigation begins with an improved generation of quantum inertial navigation. 

However, the capabilities of quantum sensing extend beyond traditional methods by accessing new signals that were previously challenging to detect in real-world environments. As a result, quantum navigation technology represents a significant advancement, ensuring enhanced reliability and opening new possibilities for future applications.

Is Your Android Device Tracking You? Understanding its Monitoring Methods

 

In general discussions about how Android phones might collect location and personal data, the focus often falls on third-party apps rather than Google's built-in apps. This awareness has grown due to numerous apps gathering significant information about users, leading to concerns, especially when targeted ads start appearing. The worry persists about whether apps, despite OS permissions, eavesdrop on private in-person conversations, a concern even addressed by Instagram's head in a 2019 CBS News interview.

However, attention to third-party apps tends to overshadow the fact that Android and its integrated apps track users extensively. While much of this tracking aligns with user preferences, it results in a substantial accumulation of sensitive personal data on phones. Even for those trusting Google with their information, understanding the collected data and its usage remains crucial, especially considering the limited options available to opt out of this data collection.

For instance, a lesser-known feature involves Google Assistant's ability to identify a parked car and send a notification regarding its location. This functionality, primarily guesswork, varies in accuracy and isn't widely publicized by Google, reflecting how tech companies leverage personal data for results that might raise concerns about potential eavesdropping.

The ways Android phones track users were highlighted in an October 2021 Kaspersky blog post referencing a study by researchers from the University of Edinburgh and Trinity College. While seemingly innocuous, the compilation of installed apps, when coupled with other personal data, can reveal intimate details about users, such as their religion or mental health status. This fusion of app presence with location data exposes highly personal information through AI-based assumptions.

Another focal point was the extensive collection of unique identifiers by Google and OEMs, tying users to specific handsets. While standard data collection aids app troubleshooting, these unique identifiers, including Google Advertising IDs, device serial numbers, and SIM card details, can potentially associate users even after phone number changes, factory resets, or ROM installations.

The study also emphasized the potential invasiveness of data collection methods, such as Xiaomi uploading app window histories and Huawei's keyboard logging app usage. Details like call durations and keyboard activity could lead to inferences about users' activities and health, reflecting the extensive and often unnoticed data collection practices by smartphones, as highlighted by Trinity College's Prof. Doug Leith.

Google Reaches an Agreement with 40 States Over Location Tracking Practices

 

Google has consented to a $391.5 million settlement with 40 states over its use of location tracking, according to Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum. Even when users thought they had turned off location tracking in their account settings, Google continued to collect information about their whereabouts, according to Oregon's Attorney General's office. 

Commencing in 2023, the settlement requires Google to be more transparent with users and provide clearer location-tracking disclosures. The settlement was led by Rosenblum and Nebraska Attorney General Doug Peterson. As per the release, it is the largest consumer privacy settlement ever led by a group of attorneys general.

“Consistent with improvements we’ve made in recent years, we have settled this investigation which was based on outdated product policies that we changed years ago,” said Google spokesperson José Castañeda in a statement.

The basis of the investigation was revealed in a 2018 Associated Press report.

Rosenblum said in the release, “For years Google has prioritized profit over their users’ privacy. They have been crafty and deceptive. Consumers thought they had turned off their location tracking features on Google, but the company continued to secretly record their movements and use that information for advertisers.”

Google paid $85 million to settle a similar lawsuit with Arizona last month, and the company is facing additional location tracking lawsuits in Washington, D.C., Indiana, Texas, and Washington state. According to the four AGs, Google was using location data for its ad business. 

The lawsuits instruct the court to order Google to hand over any algorithms developed with allegedly ill-gotten gains, as well as any monetary profits.