Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Showing posts with label Website vulnerability. Show all posts

Brizy WordPress Plugin Exploit Chains Permit Full Site Takeovers

 

According to researchers, flaws in the Brizy Page Builder plugin for WordPress sites may be linked together to allow attackers to totally take over a website. 

Brizy (or Brizy - Page Builder) is used on over 90,000 websites. It's advertised as an easy-to-use website builder for individuals with no technical knowledge. It has over 500 pre-designed blocks, maps and video integration, and drag-and-drop creation capability. 

Before version 2.3.17, it also had a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability and an arbitrary file-upload vulnerability, according to researchers. 

“During a routine review of our firewall rules, we found traffic indicating that a vulnerability might be present in the Brizy – Page Builder plugin, though it did not appear to be under active attack,” researchers at Wordfence explained in a Wednesday posting. 

“This led us to discover two new vulnerabilities as well as a previously patched access-control vulnerability in the plugin that had been reintroduced.” 

According to the researchers, the two new flaws may be chained together with the reintroduced access control weakness to enable total site takeover. Any logged-in user, in combination with the stored XSS flaw, would be able to edit any published post and inject malicious JavaScript into it. Meanwhile, a combination with the other flaw may allow any logged-in user to post potentially executable files and achieve remote code execution. 

A Reintroduced Access Control Bug Serves as the Attack's Foundation

The previous access-control problem (now listed as CVE-2021-38345) was fixed in June 2020 but reappeared this year in version 1.0.127. According to Wordfence, it's a high-severity problem caused by a lack of adequate authorisation checks, allowing attackers to edit posts. The plugin used a pair of administrator functions for a wide range of authorization checks, and any user that passed one of these tests was considered to be an administrator.

"Being logged in and visiting any endpoint in the wp-admin directory was sufficient to pass this check," as per the researchers. 

As a result, all logged-in users, such as newsletter subscribers, were able to alter any post or page made or updated with the Brizy editor, even if it had already been published. 

According to Wordfence’s analysis, “While this vulnerability might only be a nuisance on its own, allowing attackers to replace the original contents of pages, it enabled two additional vulnerabilities that could each be used to take over a site.” 
 
The first follow-on bug (CVE-2021-38344) is a medium-severity stored XSS flaw that allows intruders to insert malicious scripts into web pages. Because it is a stored XSS issue rather than a reflected one, victims are only required to visit the affected page to be attacked. 

The flaw allows a less-privileged user (such as a contributor or subscriber) to attach JavaScript to an update request, which is subsequently executed if the post is read or previewed by another user, such as an administrator. It becomes hazardous, however, when paired with the authorisation bypass, according to the researchers. 

The second new vulnerability is a high-severity arbitrary file-upload flaw (CVE-2021-38346), which might allow authenticated users to post files to a website. According to Wordfence researchers, the authorization check vulnerability allows subscriber-level users to elevate their privileges and subsequently upload executable files to a place of their choice via the brizy_create_block_screenshot AJAX method. According to the evaluation, other types of assaults are also possible.

“While the plugin appended .JPG to all uploaded filenames, a double extension attack was also possible,” researchers explained. 

“For instance, a file named shell.php would be saved as shell.php.jpg, and would be executable on a number of common configurations, including Apache/modPHP with an AddHandler or unanchored SetHandler directive. An attacker could also prepend their filename with ../ to perform a directory traversal attack and place their file in an arbitrary location, which could potentially be used to circumvent execution restrictions added via .htaccess.” 

Thus, “by supplying a file with a .PHP extension in the id parameter, and base64-encoded PHP code in the ibsf parameter, an attacker could effectively upload an executable PHP file and obtain full remote code execution on a site, allowing site takeover,” they added. 

Users can protect themselves by switching to the most recent version of the plugin, 2.3.17.

Student Uncovers Flaw in Education Software Exposing Data of Students



A high school senior in Lexington, Massachusetts discovered two vulnerabilities in software programs employed by his school which could have potentially affected the student data of around 5 million students.

Billi Demikarpi is a teen hacker who developed a penchant for hacking when he was in the freshman year and subsequently uncovered serious security flaws in two education programs, Aspen and Blackboard.

Reportedly, the probable consequences of these vulnerabilities would have been more disastrous than those San Diego Unified School District faced after the massive data breach that put to risk the data of more than 500,000 students along with the staff of the school.

The information that could have been exposed via the Aspen vulnerability includes details of bus routes, birthplaces, special education status, number of reduced or free lunches and suspensions.

It could have been exploited by the hacker to gain access to the data on the website after entering his own script as the Aspen website lacked the filters which other websites usually contain in order to reject hacker requests.

According to the statements given by both the companies, no one has exploited the security flaws besides Billi, who only accessed the information about himself and of a friend's whom he took consent from before doing so.

While sharing  his experience, Demirkapi said, “These companies say they're secure, that they do audits, but don't take the necessary steps to protect themselves from threats.”