A cyberespionage group known in security research circles as PlushDaemon has been carrying out a long-running operation in which they take advantage of software update systems to secretly install their own tools on targeted computers. According to new analysis by ESET, this group has been active for several years and has repeatedly improved its techniques. Their operations have reached both individuals and organizations across multiple regions, including areas in East Asia, the United States, and Oceania. Victims have included universities, companies that manufacture electronics, and even a major automotive facility located in Cambodia. ESET’s data suggests that this shift toward manipulating software updates has been a consistent part of PlushDaemon’s strategy since at least 2019, which indicates the group has found this method to be reliable and efficient.
The attackers begin by attempting to take control of the network equipment that people rely on for internet connectivity, such as routers or similar devices. They usually exploit security weaknesses that are already publicly known or take advantage of administrators who have left weak passwords unchanged. Once the attackers get access to these devices, they install a custom-built implant researchers call EdgeStepper. This implant is written in the Go programming language and compiled in a format that works comfortably on Linux-based router systems. After deployment, EdgeStepper operates quietly in the background, monitoring how the device handles internet traffic.
What makes this implant dangerous is its ability to interfere with DNS queries. DNS is the system that helps computers find the correct server whenever a user tries to reach a domain name. EdgeStepper watches these requests and checks whether a particular domain is involved in delivering software updates. If EdgeStepper recognizes an update-related domain, it interferes and redirects the request to a server controlled by PlushDaemon. The victim sees no warning sign because the update process appears completely normal. However, instead of downloading a legitimate update from the software provider, the victim unknowingly receives a malicious file from the attackers’ infrastructure.
This deceptive update carries the first stage of a layered malware chain. The initial file is a Windows component known as LittleDaemon. It is intentionally disguised as a DLL file to convince the system that it is a harmless library file. Once LittleDaemon runs, it connects to one of the attacker-controlled nodes and downloads the next stage, known as DaemonicLogistics. This second-stage tool is decrypted and executed directly in memory, which makes it more difficult for traditional security products to spot because it avoids writing visible files to disk. DaemonicLogistics is essentially the bridge that loads the final and most important payload.
The last payload is the group’s advanced backdoor, SlowStepper. This backdoor has been documented in earlier incidents, including a case in which users of a South Korean VPN service unknowingly received a trojanized installer from what appeared to be the vendor’s official site. SlowStepper gives the attackers broad access to a compromised machine. It can gather system information, execute various commands, browse and manipulate files, and activate additional spyware tools. Many of these tools are written in Python and are designed to steal browser data, capture keystrokes, and extract stored credentials, giving PlushDaemon a detailed picture of the victim’s activity.
ESET researchers also examined the group’s interference with update traffic for Sogou Pinyin, which is one of the most widely used Chinese input software products. While this example helps illustrate the group’s behavior, the researchers observed similar hijacking patterns affecting other software products as well. This means PlushDaemon is not focused on one specific application but is instead targeting any update system they can manipulate through the network devices they have compromised. Because their technique relies on controlling the network path rather than exploiting a flaw inside the software itself, the group’s approach could be applied to targets anywhere in the world.
The research report includes extensive technical information on every component uncovered in this campaign and offers indicators of compromise for defenders, including associated files, domains, and IP addresses. These findings suggest how imperative it is that a routine process like installing updates can become a highly effective attack vector when network infrastructure is tampered with. The case also reinforces the importance of securing routers and keeping administrator credentials strong, since a compromised device at the network level allows attackers to alter traffic without the user noticing any warning signs.
A coordinated review by several federal agencies in the United States has intensified scrutiny of TP-Link home routers, with officials considering whether the devices should continue to be available in the country. Recent reporting indicates that more than six departments and agencies have supported a proposal recommending restrictions because the routers may expose American data to security risks.
Public attention on the matter began in December 2024, when major U.S. outlets revealed that the Departments of Commerce, Defense and Justice had opened parallel investigations into TP-Link. The inquiries focused on whether the company’s corporate structure and overseas connections could create opportunities for foreign government influence. After those initial disclosures, little additional information surfaced until the Washington Post reported that the proposal had cleared interagency review.
Officials involved believe the potential risk comes from how TP-Link products collect and manage sensitive information, combined with the company’s operational ties to China. TP-Link strongly disputes the allegation that it is subject to any foreign authority and says its U.S. entity functions independently. The company maintains that it designs and manufactures its devices without any outside control.
TP-Link was founded in Shenzhen in 1996 and reorganized in 2024 into two entities: TP-Link Technologies and TP-Link Systems. The U.S. arm, TP-Link Systems, operates from Irvine, California, with roughly 500 domestic employees and thousands more across its global workforce. Lawmakers previously expressed concern that companies with overseas operations may be required to comply with foreign legal demands. They also cited past incidents in which compromised routers, including those from TP-Link, were used by threat actors during cyber operations targeting the United States.
The company has grown rapidly in the U.S. router market since 2019. Some reports place its share at a majority of consumer sales, although TP-Link disputes those figures and points to independent data that estimates a smaller share. One industry platform found that about 12 percent of active U.S. home routers are TP-Link devices. Previous reporting also noted that more than 300 internet providers distribute TP-Link equipment to customers.
In a separate line of inquiry, the Department of Justice is examining whether TP-Link set prices at levels intended to undercut competitors. The company denies this and says its pricing remains sustainable and profitable.
Cybersecurity researchers have found security flaws in routers from many manufacturers, not only TP-Link. Independent analysts identified firmware implants linked to state-sponsored groups, as well as widespread botnet activity involving small office and home routers. A Microsoft study reported that some TP-Link devices became part of password spray attacks when users did not change default administrator credentials. Experts emphasize that router vulnerabilities are widespread across the industry and not limited to one brand.
Consumers who use TP-Link routers can reduce risk by updating administrator passwords, applying firmware updates, enabling modern encryption such as WPA3, turning on built-in firewalls, and considering reputable VPN services. Devices that no longer receive updates should be replaced.
The Department of Commerce has not issued a final ruling. Reports suggest that ongoing U.S. diplomatic discussions with China could influence the timeline. TP-Link has said it is willing to improve transparency, strengthen cybersecurity practices and relocate certain functions if required.
China has approved major changes to its Cybersecurity Law, marking its first substantial update since the framework was introduced in 2017. The revised legislation, passed by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress in late October 2025, is scheduled to come into effect on January 1, 2026. The new version aims to respond to emerging technological risks, refine enforcement powers, and bring greater clarity to how cybersecurity incidents must be handled within the country.
A central addition to the law is a new provision focused on artificial intelligence. This is the first time China’s cybersecurity legislation directly acknowledges AI as an area requiring state guidance. The updated text calls for protective measures around AI development, emphasising the need for ethical guidelines, safety checks, and governance mechanisms for advanced systems. At the same time, the law encourages the use of AI and similar technologies to enhance cybersecurity management. Although the amendment outlines strategic expectations, the specific rules that organisations will need to follow are anticipated to be addressed through later regulations and detailed technical standards.
The revised law also introduces stronger enforcement capabilities. Penalties for serious violations have been raised, giving regulators wider authority to impose heavier fines on both companies and individuals who fail to meet their obligations. The scope of punishable conduct has been expanded, signalling an effort to tighten accountability across China’s digital environment. In addition, the law’s extraterritorial reach has been broadened. Previously, cross-border activities were only included when they targeted critical information infrastructure inside China. The new framework allows authorities to take action against foreign activities that pose any form of network security threat, even if the incident does not involve critical infrastructure. In cases deemed particularly severe, regulators may impose sanctions that include financial restrictions or other punitive actions.
Alongside these amendments, the Cyberspace Administration of China has issued a comprehensive nationwide reporting rule called the Administrative Measures for National Cybersecurity Incident Reporting. This separate regulation will become effective on November 1, 2025. The Measures bring together different reporting requirements that were previously scattered across multiple guidelines, creating a single, consistent system for organisations responsible for operating networks or providing services through Chinese networks. The Measures appear to focus solely on incidents that occur within China, including those that affect infrastructure inside the country.
The reporting rules introduce a clear structure for categorising incidents. Events are divided into four levels based on their impact. Under the new criteria, an incident qualifies as “relatively major” if it involves a data breach affecting more than one million individuals or if it results in economic losses of over RMB 5 million. When such incidents occur, organisations must file an initial report within four hours of discovery. A more complete submission is required within seventy-two hours, followed by a final review report within thirty days after the incident is resolved.
To streamline compliance, the regulator has provided several reporting channels, including a hotline, an online portal, email, and the agency’s official WeChat account. Organisations that delay reporting, withhold information, or submit false details may face penalties. However, the Measures state that timely and transparent reporting can reduce or remove liability under the revised law.
The news first came in December last year. According to the WSJ, officials at the Departments of Justice, Commerce, and Defense had launched investigations into the company due to national security threats from China.
Currently, the proposal has gotten interagency approval. According to the Washington Post, "Commerce officials concluded TP-Link Systems products pose a risk because the US-based company's products handle sensitive American data and because the officials believe it remains subject to jurisdiction or influence by the Chinese government."
But TP-Link's connections to the Chinese government are not confirmed. The company has denied of any ties with being a Chinese company.
The company was founded in China in 1996. After the October 2024 investigation, the company split into two: TP-Link Systems and TP-Link Technologies. "TP-Link's unusual degree of vulnerabilities and required compliance with [Chinese] law are in and of themselves disconcerting. When combined with the [Chinese] government's common use of [home office] routers like TP-Link to perpetrate extensive cyberattacks in the United States, it becomes significantly alarming" the officials wrote in October 2024.
The company dominated the US router market since the COVID pandemic. It rose from 20% of total router sales to 65% between 2019 and 2025.
The US DoJ is investigating if TP-Link was involved in predatory pricing by artificially lowering its prices to kill the competition.
The potential ban is due to an interagency review and is being handled by the Department of Commerce. Experts say that the ban may be lifted in future due to Trump administration's ongoing negotiations with China.
The United Kingdom’s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) has cautioned that hacking groups connected to China are responsible for an increasing number of cyberattacks targeting British organisations. Officials say the country has become one of the most capable and persistent sources of digital threats worldwide, with operations extending across government systems, private firms, and global institutions.
Paul Chichester, the NCSC’s Director of Operations, explained that certain nations, including China, are now using cyber intrusions as part of their broader national strategy to gain intelligence and influence. According to the NCSC’s latest annual report, China remains a “highly sophisticated” threat actor capable of conducting complex and coordinated attacks.
This warning coincides with a government initiative urging major UK companies to take stronger measures to secure their digital infrastructure. Ministers have written to hundreds of business leaders, asking them to review their cyber readiness and adopt more proactive protection strategies against ransomware, data theft, and state-sponsored attacks.
Last year, security agencies from the Five Eyes alliance, comprising the UK, the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand uncovered a large-scale operation by a Chinese company that controlled a botnet of over 260,000 compromised devices. In August, officials again warned that Chinese-backed hackers were targeting telecommunications providers by exploiting vulnerabilities in routers and using infected devices to infiltrate additional networks.
The NCSC also noted that other nations, including Russia, are believed to be “pre-positioning” their cyber capabilities in critical sectors such as energy and transportation. Chichester emphasized that the war in Ukraine has demonstrated how cyber operations are now used as instruments of power, enabling states to disrupt essential services and advance strategic goals.
Artificial Intelligence: A New Tool for Attackers
The report highlights that artificial intelligence is increasingly being used by hostile actors to improve the speed and efficiency of existing attack techniques. The NCSC clarified that, while AI is not currently enabling entirely new forms of attacks, it allows adversaries to automate certain stages of hacking, such as identifying security flaws or crafting convincing phishing emails.
Ollie Whitehouse, the NCSC’s Chief Technology Officer, described AI as a “productivity enhancer” for cybercriminals. He explained that it is helping less experienced hackers conduct sophisticated campaigns and enabling organized groups to expand operations more rapidly. However, he reassured that AI does not currently pose an existential threat to national security.
Ransomware Remains the Most Severe Risk
For UK businesses, ransomware continues to be the most pressing danger. Criminals behind these attacks are financially motivated, often targeting organisations with weak security controls regardless of size or industry. The NCSC reports seeing daily incidents affecting schools, charities, and small enterprises struggling to recover from system lockouts and data loss.
To strengthen national resilience, the upcoming Cyber Security and Resilience Bill will require critical service providers, including data centres and managed service firms, to report cyber incidents within 24 hours. By increasing transparency and response speed, the government hopes to limit the impact of future attacks.
The NCSC urges business leaders to treat cyber risk as a priority at the executive level. Understanding the urgency of action, maintaining up-to-date systems, and investing in employee awareness are essential steps to prevent further damage. As cyber activity grows “more intense, frequent, and intricate,” the agency stresses that a united effort between the government and private sector is crucial to protecting the UK’s digital ecosystem.