Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Here's Why Cyber Security is Critical For Healthcare Sector

 

Healthcare organisations provide an essential service that, if disrupted by a cyber attack, could jeopardise patient safety, disrupt care delivery, and even result in death. In the case of a security incident, the implications could impact not only the victim organisation, but also their patients and national security. 

What makes medical device cybersecurity critical?

Unlike traditional computers, medical devices often lack adequate security protections, making them more vulnerable to hacking. These devices frequently rely on hard-coded and typically known passwords, and thus may not be easily patched or updated. 

Complicating matters further, the variety of manufacturers and distribution channels leads to a lack of conventional security controls like passwords, encryption, and device monitoring. The primary security risk is the possible exposure of both data and device control, resulting in a delicate balance between safety and security that necessitates stakeholder collaboration, particularly in implementation and maintenance methods. 

Given that older medical devices were not initially created with cyber security in mind and are difficult to secure properly, healthcare institutions must prioritise and invest in securing these devices. In order to minimise operational disruptions and protect patient safety and privacy, it is imperative to safeguard medical equipment, as the proliferation of newly linked devices exacerbates pre-existing vulnerabilities. 

Mitigation tips

Based on their experience working in healthcare the sector, researchers suggested  safety guidelines for healthcare organisations aiming to strengthen their cyber security:

  • Adopt a proactive strategy to cyber security, addressing people, processes, and technology. 
  • Define clear roles and responsibilities for network and information system security so that employees can take ownership of essential cybersecurity practices. 
  • Conduct regular cyber risk assessments to uncover flaws, evaluate potential threats, and prioritise remedial activities based on the risk to critical systems and patient data.
  • Conduct training programs to raise awareness and prepare for cyber threats. 
  • Establish well-defined policies and procedures as part of your security management system, together with conveniently available documentation to guide your security personnel. 
  • Use defence-in-depth technical controls to effectively guard, detect, respond to, and recover from incidents.
  • Backup and disaster recovery plans are used to ensure the availability and integrity of essential data in the case of a cyberattack, system failure, or data breach. 
  • Medical device security should be addressed explicitly throughout the product/system lifetime.

By implementing these best practices, healthcare companies can fortify their defences, mitigate cyber risks, and safeguard patient data and critical infrastructure from emerging cyber threats.

Weak Passwords Still Common in Education Sector, Says NordVPN Report

 

A new study by NordVPN has revealed a serious cybersecurity issue plaguing the education sector: widespread reliance on weak and easily guessable passwords. Universities, schools, and training centres continue to be highly vulnerable due to the reuse of simple passwords that offer minimal protection.  

According to NordVPN’s research, the most frequently used password across educational institutions is the infamous ‘123456’, with over 1.2 million instances recorded. This is closely followed by other equally insecure combinations like ‘123456789’ and ‘12345678’. Shockingly, commonly used words such as ‘password’ and ‘secret’ also rank in the top five, making them among the least secure options in existence. 

Karolis Arbaciauskas, head of business product at NordPass, emphasized that educational institutions often store a wealth of sensitive data, including student records and staff communications. Yet many are still using default or recycled passwords that would fail even the most basic security check. He warned that such practices make schools prime targets for cybercriminals. 

The consequences of this weak security posture are already visible. One of the most notable examples is the Power Schools breach, where personal information, including names, birthdates, and contact details of nearly 62 million students and educators, was compromised. These incidents highlight how vulnerable educational data can be when simple security measures are neglected.  

Cybercriminals are increasingly targeting schools not just for monetary gain but also to steal children’s identities. With access to personal information, they can commit fraud such as applying for loans or credit cards in the names of underage victims who are unlikely to detect such activity due to their lack of a credit history. 

To mitigate these risks, NordVPN recommends adopting stronger password practices. A secure password should be at least 12 characters long, combining uppercase and lowercase letters, numbers, and special symbols. One example is using a memorable phrase with substitutions, like turning a TV show quote into ‘Streets;Ahead6S&AM!’. Alternatively, using a trusted password manager or generator can help enforce robust security across accounts. 

As digital threats evolve, it’s critical that educational institutions update their cybersecurity hygiene, starting with stronger passwords. This simple step can help protect not only sensitive data but also the long-term digital identities of students and staff.

Can AI Be Trusted With Sensitive Business Data?

 



As artificial intelligence becomes more common in businesses, from retail to finance to technology— it’s helping teams make faster decisions. But behind these smart predictions is a growing problem: how do you make sure employees only see what they’re allowed to, especially when AI mixes information from many different places?

Take this example: A retail company’s AI tool predicts upcoming sales trends. To do this, it uses both public market data and private customer records. The output looks clean and useful but what if that forecast is shown to someone who isn’t supposed to access sensitive customer details? That’s where access control becomes tricky.


Why Traditional Access Rules Don’t Work for AI

In older systems, access control was straightforward. Each person had certain permissions: developers accessed code, managers viewed reports, and so on. But AI changes the game. These systems pull data from multiple sources, internal files, external APIs, sensor feeds, and combine everything to create insights. That means even if a person only has permission for public data, they might end up seeing results that are based, in part, on private or restricted information.


Why It Matters

Security Concerns: If sensitive data ends up in the wrong hands even indirectly, it can lead to data leaks. A 2025 study showed that over two-thirds of companies had AI-related security issues due to weak access controls.

Legal Risks: Privacy laws like the GDPR require clear separation of data. If a prediction includes restricted inputs and is shown to the wrong person, companies can face heavy fines.

Trust Issues: When employees or clients feel their data isn’t safe, they lose trust in the system, and the business.


What’s Making This So Difficult?

1. AI systems often blend data so deeply that it’s hard to tell what came from where.

2. Access rules are usually fixed, but AI relies on fast-changing data.

3. Companies have many users with different roles and permissions, making enforcement complicated.

4. Permissions are often too broad, for example, someone allowed to "view reports" might accidentally access sensitive content.


How Can Businesses Fix This?

• Track Data Origins: Label data as "public" or "restricted" and monitor where it ends up.

• Flexible Access Rules: Adjust permissions based on user roles and context.

• Filter Outputs: Build AI to hide or mask parts of its response that come from private sources.

• Separate Models: Train different AI models for different user groups, each with its own safe data.

• Monitor Usage: Keep logs of who accessed what, and use alerts to catch suspicious activity.


As AI tools grow more advanced and rely on live data from many sources, managing access will only get harder. Businesses must modernize their security strategies to protect sensitive information without slowing down innovation.

NVIDIA Urges Users to Enable ECC to Defend GDDR6 GPUs Against Rowhammer Threats

  

NVIDIA has issued a renewed advisory encouraging customers to activate System Level Error-Correcting Code (ECC) protections to defend against Rowhammer attacks targeting GPUs equipped with GDDR6 memory.

This heightened warning follows recent research from the University of Toronto demonstrating how practical Rowhammer attacks can be on NVIDIA’s A6000 graphics processor.

“We ran GPUHammer on an NVIDIA RTX A6000 (48 GB GDDR6) across four DRAM banks and observed 8 distinct single-bit flips, and bit-flips across all tested banks,” the researchers explained. “The minimum activation count (TRH) to induce a flip was ~12K, consistent with prior DDR4 findings.”

Using these induced bit flips, the researchers performed what they described as the first machine learning accuracy degradation attack leveraging Rowhammer on a GPU.

Rowhammer exploits a hardware vulnerability where repeatedly accessing a memory row can cause adjacent memory cells to change state, flipping bits from 1 to 0 or vice versa. This can lead to denial-of-service issues, corrupted data, or even potential privilege escalation.

System Level ECC combats such risks by introducing redundant bits that can automatically detect and correct single-bit memory errors, ensuring data remains intact.

NVIDIA emphasized that enabling ECC is particularly critical for workstation and data center GPUs, which handle sensitive workloads like AI training and inference, to prevent serious computational errors.

The company’s security bulletin confirmed that researchers “showed a potential Rowhammer attack against an NVIDIA A6000 GPU with GDDR6 Memory” in scenarios where ECC had not been turned on.

The GPUHammer technique developed by the academic team successfully induced bit flips despite GDDR6’s higher latency and faster refresh rates, which generally make Rowhammer attacks more challenging compared to older DDR4 memory.

Researcher Gururaj Saileshwar told BleepingComputer that their demonstration could drop an AI model’s accuracy from 80% to below 1% with just a single bit flip on the A6000.

In addition to the RTX A6000, NVIDIA strongly recommends enabling ECC on the following GPU product lines:

Data Center GPUs:
  • Ampere: A100, A40, A30, A16, A10, A2, A800
  • Ada: L40S, L40, L4
  • Hopper: H100, H200, GH200, H20, H800
  • Blackwell: GB200, B200, B100
  • Turing: T1000, T600, T400, T4
  • Volta: Tesla V100, Tesla V100S
Workstation GPUs:
  • Ampere RTX: A6000, A5000, A4500, A4000, A2000, A1000, A400
  • Ada RTX: 6000, 5000, 4500, 4000, 4000 SFF, 2000
  • Blackwell RTX PRO (latest workstation line)
  • Turing RTX: 8000, 6000, 5000, 4000
  • Volta: Quadro GV100
Embedded/Industrial:
  • Jetson AGX Orin Industrial
  • IGX Orin
Newer GPUs—including Blackwell RTX 50 Series, Blackwell Data Center chips, and Hopper Data Center GPUs—feature built-in on-die ECC protection that requires no manual configuration.

To verify whether ECC is active, administrators can use an out-of-band method through the Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) and Redfish API to check the “ECCModeEnabled” status. NVIDIA’s NSM Type 3 and SMBPBI tools also allow ECC configuration, but these require NVIDIA Partner Portal access.

Alternatively, ECC can be checked or enabled in-band using the nvidia-smi command-line tool from the system CPU.

Saileshwar noted that enabling these safeguards could reduce machine learning inference performance by around 10% and reduce available memory capacity by 6.5% across workloads.

While Rowhammer remains a significant security concern, its exploitation in real-world scenarios is complex. An attack requires highly specific conditions, intensive memory access, and precise control, making it difficult to carry out reliably, especially in production environments.

Ingram Micro Faces Major Outage Following Ransomware Incident


 

An assault on Ingram Micro's global network started on July 3, which crippled parts of the company's global network as well as disrupted its ordering portals and customer service channels. Ingram Micro is currently restoring critical systems. 

It became evident that the disruption was caused first when clients were suddenly unable to place orders or communicate with account teams via standard telephone lines, particularly resellers and managed service providers that rely heavily on the distributor's platforms. 

A wide array of regional websites became unavailable as a consequence of the outage, which forced them into maintenance mode landing pages that offered only minimal contact information for sales and technical support, emphasising the extent of the damage and how urgent it was to get them back online. 

A ransomware attack that began on July 3 triggered widespread disruptions across Ingram Micro's global infrastructure, severely affecting the ability of company to support its partners and customers. As a first sign of trouble, customers began experiencing difficulties placing orders and getting in touch with account representatives through standard communication channels, especially resellers and managed service providers, which comprise a substantial portion of the company's customer base. 

After a series of disruptions, the company decided to redirect traffic to temporary maintenance pages that contained only basic contact information for sales and support teams, as traffic to its regional websites had quickly escalated. While it was necessary to move, this move highlighted the extent of the problem and the limited availability of core services. As one of the world's largest IT distributors, Ingram Micro relied heavily on interconnected digital systems, and the impact was far-reaching, affecting partners throughout multiple countries. 

Since then, the company has worked tirelessly to restore its systems, focusing on service restoration as well as launching an investigation into the nature and extent of the breach. Ingram Micro is a global leader in business-to-business technology distribution and service providers, recognised as one of the most important and reliable technology service providers globally. 

As a leading provider of comprehensive IT solutions encompassing hardware, software, cloud computing, logistics, and professional training, Ingram Micro plays a crucial role in the IT supply chain. As a key enabler of digital infrastructure for organisations around the world, the company serves a vast network of resellers, system integrators, and managed service providers. 

It has been unresponsive since Thursday, including its official website, online ordering systems, and support systems, leading to a significant operational disruption for customers who use its digital platforms to access inventory in real-time, place orders, and receive support. Despite the fact that Ingram Micro did not publicly disclose the cause of the outage, the sustained downtime has raised concerns across the entire technology distribution ecosystem as the sustained outage has raised increasing concern. 

The incident has not only hampered the company's day-to-day operations but has also rippled across supply chains and service delivery for its clients and partners, due to the company's integral position in the global IT channel. When the cyberattack began on Thursday, it quickly took Ingram Micro's primary website, as well as significant parts of the global network infrastructure, offline and inoperable.

Late Saturday night, the company released a brief public statement acknowledging the incident, informing customers of its intent to restore systems as quickly as possible to resume order processing and core operations. Before the opening of the financial markets in the United States on Monday, Ingram Micro formally notified its shareholders regarding the breach, indicating that there may be a negative impact on the business continuity and the interest of investors. 

As a result of the timing of this outage, coincidental with the approaching long holiday weekend, it immediately triggered immediate concern, especially since ransomware attacks on high-profile organisations are becoming increasingly common during times of diminished staffing and increased vulnerability. 

With headquarters in California, Ingram Micro holds a prominent position as one of the largest distributors of hardware, software, and information technology solutions in the global technology supply chain, with several products on offer. As well as providing distribution services, the company is also a managed service provider (MSP), offering cloud management and outsourced IT services to a wide range of corporate clients, particularly small and mid-sized organisations. 

A significant portion of the outage has extended beyond logistical and e-commerce functions, with reports indicating that software licensing processes have also been disrupted as a result of the outage. Ingram Micro's backend systems have been compromised by this attack, which has made it more difficult for many customers to provision or access certain digital products which are dependent on them. It has also impacted the company's service ecosystem on multiple levels.

On Saturday evening, Ingram Micro released an official statement confirming that a ransomware attack caused the service outage that had gone on for almost 48 hours, validating the concerns expressed by the company's global customer base. In parallel with the public disclosure of the incident, the company also filed a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which indicated that the incident was likely to have a significant impact on the company's operations and materiality. 

There is no doubt that this formal regulatory filing emphasises the seriousness of the attack and shows how the company is expected to maintain transparency with its stakeholders, investors, and regulators in the aftermath of a cybersecurity breach of this magnitude, as well as the seriousness of the incident. According to industry analysts, Ingram Micro's handling of the incident highlights just how critical it is to communicate rapidly, transparently, and coordinatedly during large-scale cyber crises of any scale. 

A cascading effect has been caused across the entire global IT supply chain as core systems have been severed from vendors and clients as a result of the attack, even though it is still unclear how much damage has been caused. It is not just apparent that interconnected ecosystems can be operationally vulnerable, but the incident also serves to underscore the importance of cybersecurity resilience in the digital age in terms of strategic importance. 

"Neil Shah, Vice President at Counterpoint Research, stated that the attack exposed vulnerabilities in a broader IT value chain, particularly due to the central role Ingram Micro plays in channel operations. As a consequence of this event, Ingram's IT infrastructure was disabled, preventing access to its partners as well as its clients from being able to work. 

Consequently, Shah explained to me that this caused significant delays in processing and fulfilment, as well as the potential exposure to sensitive customer information, such as pricing structures and data related to channel partnerships,” he explained. As well, Greyhound Research's Chief Analyst and CEO, Vir Gogia, echoed these concerns by stating that cyberattacks targeting IT distributors can directly hinder the agility of global supply chains. 

If fulfilment platforms fail, a ripple effect takes place: enterprise buyers are left with backlogs and shipment delays, OEMs lose insight into downstream demand, resellers are unable to meet customer service level agreements (SLAs), and enterprise procurement teams are forced to defer capital recognition. According to the author, the consequences of centralised procurement models are especially acute in industries and regions with large-scale retail, government, and telecommunications. 

A renewed interest has also been drawn to the systemic risks associated with cloud-based infrastructures as a result of the incident. As today's supply chains rely heavily on cloud-based logistics, vendor-client management systems, and real-time data visibility, the breach at Ingram Micro highlights one of the biggest vulnerabilities in today's cloud-centric IT ecosystems. 

Besides halting the company's global operations, Ingram Micro was also disrupted by the ransomware attack, disrupting the flow of billions of dollars worth of channel transactions, which forced resellers and enterprise customers to seek alternative sources for procurement. As a result of this sudden shift in purchase behaviour, business continuity across the supply chain was severely compromised, and Ingram Micro's reputation for operational reliability and efficiency for logistical reasons was temporarily eroded. 

Industry analysts have cautioned that the incident might result in revenue deferrals, contract fulfilment delays, and possible penalties due to breaches of service-level agreements (SLAs). Several experts, however, have also pointed out that the timely disclosure of the company's issues and the coordination of remediation efforts have played a crucial role in reducing the reputational and financial consequences for the company in the long run. 

In light of this incident, the entire industry has been jolted awake, reinforcing the urgency for robust cybersecurity preparedness and agile response frameworks. During Ingram Micro's experience with the SafePay ransomware variant, it was clear that maintaining a secure and modern IT infrastructure, including security patches updated to the latest version, optimised system configurations and constant threat monitoring protocols, was imperative. 

There has been a great deal of learning from this breach, such as the importance of clear, fast communication, both internally among operational teams as well as externally to partners, clients, and regulatory authorities. Through the company's response strategy, which involved a thorough investigation and a structured recovery process, actionable insights have been gained that can be applied to enhancing cybersecurity resilience. 

In the future, this event is expected to help shape future risk management practices by emphasising the importance of being proactive and preventative in defending against cyber threats that are evolving. In the wake of the Ingram Micro ransomware attack, the broader IT industry has to reexamine and strengthen its cyber preparedness posture as soon as possible in order to recover from the incident. 

The resilience of technology supply chains depends on more than just operational efficiency, as digital infrastructure increasingly intertwines with global commerce. They must also have a strong cyber foundation in place to protect them. Organisations, particularly large-scale distributors, service providers, and vendors, need to prioritise developing incident response frameworks that are both agile and deeply integrated into business continuity plans to stay on top of cyber threats. 

The organization must adopt zero-trust architectures, run regular threat simulations, ensure system visibility in real-time, and establish clear escalation protocols with technical, legal, and communications teams simultaneously, in order to ensure real-time system visibility. Enhanced vendor risk management, third-party audits, and contingency procurement strategies should no longer be optional safeguards, but rather become a standard part of operations. 

The Ingram Micro incident has highlighted the vulnerabilities inherent in today’s cloud-reliant ecosystems; moving forward, we need to focus on proactive cyber resilience not just as a precautionary measure, but as a vital part of ensuring trust, continuity, and competitive viability in a digital economy that is increasingly dependent on cloud technologies.

Latest Malware "Mamona" Attacks Locally, Hides by Self Deletion

Latest Malware "Mamona" Attacks Locally, Hides by Self Deletion

Cybersecurity experts are tracing Mamona, a new ransomware strain that is famous for its stripped-down build and silent local execution. Experts believe that the ransomware prevents the usual command-and-control (C2) servers, choosing instead a self-contained method that moves past tools relying on network traffic analysis.  

The malware is executed locally on a Windows system as a standalone binary file. The offline approach reveals a blind spot in traditional defenses, raising questions about how even the best antivirus and detection mechanisms will work when there is no network.

Self-deletion and escape techniques make detection difficult

Once executed, it starts a three-second delay via a modified ping command, ”cmd.exe /C ping 127.0.0.7 -n 3 > Nul & Del /f /q.” After this, it self-deletes. The self-deletion helps to eliminate forensic artifacts that make it difficult for experts to track or examine the malware after it has been executed. 

The malware uses 127.0.0.7 instead of the popular 127.0.0.1, which helps in evading detection measures. This tactic escapes simple detection tests and doesn’t leave digital traces that older file-based scanners might tag. The malware also drops a ransom note titled README.HAes.txt and renames impacted files with the .HAes extension. This means the encryption was successful. 

“We integrated Sysmon with Wazuh to enrich logs from the infected endpoint and created Wazuh detection rules to identify malicious behaviour associated with Mamona ransomware,” said Wazuh in a blog post.

Spotting Mamona

Wazuh has alerted that the “plug-and-play” nature of the malware makes it easy for cybercriminals and helps in the commodization of ransomware. This change highlights an urgent need for robust inspections of what stands as the best ransomware protection when such attacks do not need remote control infrastructure. Wazu’s method to track Mamona involves combining Sysom for log capture and employing custom rules to flag particular behaviours like ransom note creation and ping-based delays.

According to TechRadar, “Rule 100901 targets the creation of the README.HAes.txt file, while Rule 100902 confirms the presence of ransomware when both ransom note activity and the delay/self-delete sequence appear together.”

CISA Lists Citrix Bleed 2 as Exploit, Gives One Day Deadline to Patch

CISA Lists Citrix Bleed 2 as Exploit, Gives One Day Deadline to Patch

CISA confirms bug exploit

The US Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) confirms active exploitation of the CitrixBleed 2 vulnerability (CVE-2025-5777 in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Gateway. It has given federal parties one day to patch the bugs. This unrealistic deadline for deploying the patches is the first since CISA issued the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, highlighting the severity of attacks abusing the security gaps. 

About the critical vulnerability

CVE-2025-5777 is a critical memory safety bug (out-of-bounds memory read) that gives hackers unauthorized access to restricted memory parts. The flaw affects NetScaler devices that are configured as an AAA virtual server or a Gateway. Citrix patched the vulnerabilities via the June 17 updates. 

After that, expert Kevin Beaumont alerted about the flaw’s capability for exploitation if left unaddressed, terming the bug as ‘CitrixBleed 2’ because it shared similarities with the infamous CitrixBleed bug (CVE-2023-4966), which was widely abused in the wild by threat actors.

What is the CitrixBleed 2 exploit?

According to Bleeping Computer, “The first warning of CitrixBleed 2 being exploited came from ReliaQuest on June 27. On July 7, security researchers at watchTowr and Horizon3 published proof-of-concept exploits (PoCs) for CVE-2025-5777, demonstrating how the flaw can be leveraged in attacks that steal user session tokens.”

The rise of exploits

During that time, experts could not spot the signs of active exploitation. Soon, the threat actors started to exploit the bug on a larger scale, and after the attack, they became active on hacker forums, “discussing, working, testing, and publicly sharing feedback on PoCs for the Citrix Bleed 2 vulnerability,” according to Bleeping Computers. 

Hackers showed interest in how to use the available exploits in attacks effectively. The hackers have become more active, and various exploits for the bug have been published.

Now that CISA has confirmed the widespread exploitation of CitrixBleed 2 in attacks, threat actors may have developed their exploits based on the recently released technical information. CISA has suggested to “apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”

Is Your Bank Login at Risk? How Chatbots May Be Guiding Users to Phishing Scams

 


Cybersecurity researchers have uncovered a troubling risk tied to how popular AI chatbots answer basic questions. When asked where to log in to well-known websites, some of these tools may unintentionally direct users to the wrong places, putting their private information at risk.

Phishing is one of the oldest and most dangerous tricks in the cybercrime world. It usually involves fake websites that look almost identical to real ones. People often get an email or message that appears to be from a trusted company, like a bank or online store. These messages contain links that lead to scam pages. If you enter your username and password on one of these fake sites, the scammer gets full access to your account.

Now, a team from the cybersecurity company Netcraft has found that even large language models or LLMs, like the ones behind some popular AI chatbots, may be helping scammers without meaning to. In their study, they tested how accurately an AI chatbot could provide login links for 50 well-known companies across industries such as finance, retail, technology, and utilities.

The results were surprising. The chatbot gave the correct web address only 66% of the time. In about 29% of cases, the links led to inactive or suspended pages. In 5% of cases, they sent users to a completely different website that had nothing to do with the original question.

So how does this help scammers? Cybercriminals can purchase these unclaimed or inactive domain names, the incorrect ones suggested by the AI, and turn them into realistic phishing pages. If people click on them, thinking they’re going to the right site, they may unknowingly hand over sensitive information like their bank login or credit card details.

In one example observed by Netcraft, an AI-powered search tool redirected users who asked about a U.S. bank login to a fake copy of the bank’s website. The real link was shown further down the results, increasing the risk of someone clicking on the wrong one.

Experts also noted that smaller companies, such as regional banks and mid-sized fintech platforms, were more likely to be affected than global giants like Apple or Google. These smaller businesses may not have the same resources to secure their digital presence or respond quickly when problems arise.

The researchers explained that this problem doesn't mean the AI tools are malicious. However, these models generate answers based on patterns, not verified sources and that can lead to outdated or incorrect responses.

The report serves as a strong reminder: AI is powerful, but it is not perfect. Until improvements are made, users should avoid relying on AI-generated links for sensitive tasks. When in doubt, type the website address directly into your browser or use a trusted bookmark.

Scamfluencers Use Social Media to Orchestrate Sophisticated Online Fraud

 

Scamfluencers, a rising category of deceptive internet personalities, are leveraging their online influence to run sophisticated scams that have already cost Americans an estimated $1.9 billion in 2024. 

These individuals masquerade as experts in finance, health, or other trusted domains to exploit trust and extract money from their followers. By blending online popularity with calculated deceit, scamfluencers are proving to be one of the most dangerous forms of digital manipulation today. 

According to Adewale Adeife, a cybersecurity consultant at EY, scamfluencers are especially dangerous because they merge their social credibility with modern deception tactics. These often include emotional manipulation, fabricated social proof such as fake likes and engagement pods, and now, even AI-generated deepfakes to bolster their authority. Scamfluencers fabricate credentials, pose as professionals, and often use emotionally charged content to draw in followers. 

In one infamous example, teenager Malachi Love-Robinson posed as a medical doctor, tricking patients and professionals alike. Others may impersonate financial experts, promising “get-rich-quick” results backed by fake testimonials and limited-time offers. Tactics also include exploiting psychological tendencies like authority bias, where users are more likely to believe information from someone who appears famous or credentialed. 

Scamfluencers also use the consistency principle—starting with small asks that escalate into larger scams. Fear, greed, and urgency are common emotional triggers they use to lower victims’ skepticism. To protect yourself, cybersecurity experts recommend several steps. 

Always verify an influencer’s claims and professional background. Be wary of requests for unconventional payments such as cryptocurrency or gift cards. If the person reacts defensively to questions, or if their results seem too good to be true, it’s likely a red flag. If you suspect you’ve encountered a scamfluencer, stop communication immediately, save all evidence, report it to your financial institution, and file complaints with law enforcement and cybercrime units. 

Social media companies are stepping up their defenses, using AI to detect fake accounts, manipulated media, and suspicious behavior. Despite these efforts, experts emphasize that individual vigilance is still the best defense against scamfluencer tactics. 

In an increasingly digital world, where influence can easily be faked and trust weaponized, staying informed and skeptical is essential. Recognizing the signs of scamfluencers helps prevent fraud and contributes to creating a safer and more authentic online environment.

DeepSeek Faces Ban From App Stores in Germany

 

DeepSeek, a competitor of ChatGPT, may face legal ramifications in the European Union after the Berlin Commissioner for Data Protection ordered that Google and Apple remove the AI app from their stores. 

After discovering that the DeepSeek app violates the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Berlin Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information Meike Kamp issued a press release on June 27 urging Google and Apple to take the app down. The action follows Kamp's earlier request that DeepSeek either voluntarily remove its app from Germany or alter its procedures to safeguard the data of German users, neither of which DeepSeek did. 

"The transfer of user data by DeepSeek to China is unlawful. DeepSeek has not been able to provide my office with convincing evidence that data of German users is protected in China at a level equivalent to that of the European Union. Chinese authorities have extensive access rights to personal data held by Chinese companies,” Kamp stated. 

"In addition, DeepSeek users in China do not have enforceable rights and effective legal remedies as guaranteed in the European Union. I have therefore informed Google and Apple, as operators of the largest app platforms, of the violations and expect a prompt review of a blocking.” 

This does not imply that DeepSeek will be removed from the Google Play Store or App Store right away. Apple and Google must consider Kamp's request and choose their course of action. If the app is eventually taken down, it probably won't affect users in other countries; it might only be blocked in Germany or the EU broadly. Despite this, millions of users may be looking for a new favourite AI software, given that DeepSeek had over 50 million downloads on the Google Play Store as of July 2025.

In any case, given this news, some users might wish to get rid of the app altogether. As Kamp's news statement states, "According to its own website, [DeepSeek] processes extensive personal data of users, including all text entries, chat histories, and uploaded files, as well as information about location, devices used, and networks.” 

Users who care about their data privacy, regardless of where they live, should likely be concerned about Kamp's office's increased efforts to have DeepSeek banned in Germany or to have it provide data protection that complies with EU regulations. However, the same could be said for the majority of social media and AI apps.

The Rise of Digital Slavery in the Age of Global Cybercrime

 


A growing number of cybercriminals are becoming more sophisticated and dangerous in the hyperconnected digital world of today. These criminals use advanced methods to exploit individuals and organisations who are not expecting them. To lure victims into divulging confidential information, perpetrators often disguise themselves as legitimate individuals—posing as bank officials, customer service representatives, or company executives—to deceive them into disclosing confidential information voluntarily. 

Social engineering is an effective way for fraudsters to manipulate emotions, exploit trust, and overcome even the most vigilant security measures. Once these fraudsters have gained access to critical information such as banking credentials, personal identification numbers, or login details, they begin stealing identities, engaging in financial fraud, and causing large-scale data breaches as a result. As a result, this cybercrime threat is particularly alarming because it is relentlessly adaptable. 

Cyberfraud, in its current form, has evolved not only from isolated phishing attempts but has also developed into a worldwide threat that is well-organised and is constantly changing as time goes on. With the rise of digital platforms, both personal and professional, there has never been a greater urgency to recognise, detect, and fight cyber fraud. 

Digital organised crime has begun to emerge as a new frontier in the digital world, where cyber slavery is emerging as a widespread and deeply concealed problem, which is an alarming development. Rather than being isolated incidents, this growing phenomenon is structured, transnational, and profit-driven, with credible investigations revealing that in so-called "scam compounds," thousands of people are held against their will. 

They are often duped into accepting fake work offers and trafficked across borders, thus forcing them to carry out large-scale online fraud operations under inhumane conditions, ranging from phishing scams to cryptocurrency scams, which are implemented by politicians and businesses alike. Many of the spam messages or suspicious links that appear to the average user to be harmless are, in fact, the product of forced labour that is orchestrated by criminal syndicates. 

In light of this troubling intersection between human trafficking and digital fraud, it is imperative that we raise global awareness, intervene with policy, and cooperate with each other so these hidden networks of exploitation will cease to operate. An opportunity that seems promising at first glance can, with a single click, plunge an unsuspecting applicant into captivity and brutal exploitation, even if it seems to offer a promising salary, flexible working schedules, and the allure of a new start abroad. 

Currently, cyberslavery encompasses several groups of victims: those deceived by online scams, as well as those who are forced to run those very scams due to their trafficking, confinement, and exploitation. It is known that these individuals are enticed to work for counterfeit companies, transported across borders, stripped of their travel documents, and locked inside secure compounds where they are forced to engage in phishing scams, romance scams, and cryptocurrency scams under constant threat of violence, and that the rapid expansion of this phenomenon is directly connected to modern connectivity. 

There was a time when limited bandwidth curtailed large-scale abuses, but today's high-speed internet, encrypted messaging apps, and global social media platforms serve as frictionless tools for traffickers to recruit, control, and conceal the forced labourers they are exploiting. A recent event underscores the scale of the problem: in Myawaddy, Myanmar, police turned over 540 Indians coerced into participating in scams after agents lured them into employment in Dubai, Bangkok, and Kuala Lumpur by promising jobs there. 

A total of 40 Karnatakaians were rescued after a lengthy journey through several Southeast Asian hubs and clandestine boat transfers. After being imprisoned and forced to commit cyberfraud against victims worldwide, they were found guilty and sentenced to conduct it. In this ordeal, the stark reality is illustrated: a shadow industry spawned by the intersection of high-tech crime and human trafficking has flourished on broken promises and stolen identity, creating an urgency for international coordination and action that must be taken now. 

There is no doubt that cyberslavery is becoming a major concern across Southeast Asia, with countries like Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and the Philippines emerging as key hotspots for this disturbing phenomenon. It has been reported that scam centres in these regions have become an epicentre of modern-day slavery and grave human rights violations, according to recent research findings. 

It is common for victims to experience physical abuse, psychological manipulation, and extreme coercion, as well as being forced to carry out sophisticated online scams targeting individuals all over the world – they are often trafficked or kidnapped. Criminal syndicates orchestrate these illicit activities, and they are enabled by complicit business networks which take advantage of resources like capital, human labour, and digital infrastructure to sustain and expand their criminal operations. 

As a result of the tremendous stakes involved, reports by international agencies have estimated that these scamcentress generate billions of dollars in illicit revenue every year. Nevertheless, it has been very difficult to dismantle this deeply embedded system, which is characterized by its transnational nature, complex organizational structures, and the presence of overlapping legal, political, and jurisdictional barriers.

In addition to this crisis, cyber slavery is still widely misunderstood by the public, causing policymaking decisions to be influenced by public misconceptions, which limit public awareness and support for victims of cyber slavery. As these scam networks have evolved over the past decade, they have shown a further sign of their increasing sophistication as well. At first, such operations were based out of modest apartments, small villas, or rented hotels.

The trend began to shift by the late 2010s, with large-scale compounds containing multiple criminal operations under one roof while employing thousands of coerced workers under the roof. This phenomenon became especially prevalent in the Cambodian city of Sihanoukville, which has become a central hub for such operations in the past few years, emphasising the necessity for coordinated regional and global responses to combat a growing industry of digital exploitation that has become largely hidden but has become more aggressive in recent years. 

Currently, law enforcement agencies are grappling with the challenge of combating cyber slavery, a complex and ever-evolving problem, as it is characterised by transnational criminality, legal fragmentation, and legal instability across different jurisdictions. Cybercriminals are often based in countries with different laws governing cybercrime, regulatory frameworks, and definitions of digital exploitation, making international cooperation both complex and inconclusive.

It can be exceedingly difficult to collect admissible evidence across borders, especially with the help of mechanisms like the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT), because they are extremely time-consuming and bureaucratic in nature, which can often delay vital investigative action. In addition to that difficulty, fraudsters and scam operators frequently mask themselves with false documents, virtual private networks (VPNs), and encrypted communication platforms, which makes their activities even more difficult. 

Cyber slavery, in addition, is not limited to forced labour used in scam operations. As a result, some individuals are blackmailed or psychologically manipulated into participating in cybercrime, blurring the line between culpability and victimhood, as a result of which they are blackmailed or psychologically manipulated. As a key component of building a case, digital evidence presents its own set of challenges. 

Since it is volatile, it must be preserved in the utmost way possible. Victims trapped in scam compounds, however, are often unable to communicate online or are unable to interact via tightly controlled channels, so they are limited in their ability to report abuse or cooperate with authorities. These restrictions highlight the urgent need for a multifaceted response to these crimes.
To effectively address the threat of cyber slavery, several strategic approaches must be developed, including cross-border collaboration, cybercrime units, public-private partnerships, and proactive legal reforms. There needs to be a vigorous enforcement of domestic laws such as the Indian Emigration Act of 1983, in particular to crack down on illegal recruitment agents who are a significant part of the trafficking industry by masquerading as overseas employees. 

Additionally, large-scale awareness campaigns can be conducted via traditional as well as digital media simultaneously to inform the public, especially vulnerable job seekers, regarding the risks that unregistered recruiters pose to them, as well as their deceptive tactics used to lure people into digital servitude. There is only one way to effectively curb the growing menace of cyber slavery, and that is by coordinating global efforts, reforming policies, and maintaining public involvement. 

A rapid increase in cyber fraud is an indication that cyber fraud is becoming an increasingly dangerous threat within the digital ecosystem. It entails a variety of sophisticated tactics, along with a broad spectrum of damaging consequences resulting from cyber fraud. In its simplest sense, cyber fraud is a form of deception that manipulates victims into disclosing sensitive information or performing actions that serve the fraudsters' interests. 
To achieve this kind of manipulation, advanced technological means are often employed, including phishing schemes, malware deployment, and a variety of social engineering techniques. Cyber fraud is an alarming phenomenon in the sense that the perpetrators usually operate under a veil of anonymity online, which makes the task of tracing and prosecuting offenders incredibly difficult. 

Cyber fraud has a global reach that is one of its most alarming aspects. It is different from traditional crime in that it transcends geographical boundaries, meaning that perpetrators can target victims on other continents and with minimal risk of detection. Further, there is an ever-evolving landscape of cyber fraud. 

As fraudsters adjust their methods to counter the increased security measures that organisations and individuals face, individuals and  mustorganisations remain informed and proactive in adopting robust cybersecurity protocols, no matter what. Several forms of cyber fraud havebecomeg more popular in recent years. 

Phishing attacks, for example, use phoney email messages, messages from phoney websites, or false links to steal login information and financial details. Identity theft is when individuals are impersonated by someone else in order to conduct unauthorised transactions by using their personal data. Online scams exploit trust to request payments or personal information under false pretences, while ransomware attacks block users from accessing their own data, requiring payment before they can get to it. 

Data breaches, which occur when a secure system is breached by an unauthorised individual, expose large amounts of sensitive data with lasting consequences. Cyber fraud has profound and far-reaching effects on a company's bottom line. Financial losses are one of the most immediate and visible consequences, as victims may suffer theft of funds, unauthorised purchases, or costly efforts to recover their money. 

In addition, businesses can suffer severe reputational damage, leading to reduced consumer trust, regulatory penalties, and the possibility of a lawsuit. Furthermore, cyber attacks can cause significant disruptions to vital services such as healthcare, transportation, and communications, which puts the public at risk. 

Cyber fraud is a problem of a global scale that threatens trust in digital platforms and financial systems. The persistence of cyber fraud erodes trust in digital platforms and financial systems, which constitutes a significant obstacle to economic stability and growth in a world which is increasingly connected. The government, businesses, and ordinary citizens must adopt vigilance and responsibility to stem the escalating tide of cyber-enabled exploitation. 

Lawmakers should close jurisdictional gaps by harmonising cybercrime statutes and streamlining evidence-sharing protocols, at the same time that enforcement agencies need to invest heavily in digital forensics capacity and the development of multilingual victim support channels to close cybercrime loopholes. Especially in the areas of finance, telecommunications, and social media, private firms need to implement a real-time fraud detection system and rigorously vet third-party recruiters who operate on their platforms.

The first line of defence should remain establishing “zero-trust” digital habits at the individual level, which includes verifying unsolicited emails, using strong authentication, and immediately reporting suspicious activity. A multilayered, collaborative approach is the only way for the global community to dismantle the infrastructure of cyber slavery and fraud, protect vulnerable populations, and restore trust in the digital economy through the implementation of this multilayered, collaborative approach.