.jpg "Russian Threat Actors Deploy Zero-Click Exploit in High-Impact Attack on France")
.jpg)
The end of 2025 and global cybersecurity assessments indicated that one of the most formidable state-aligned hacking units in Russia has changed its tactics significantly. It has been widely reported that state-sponsored threat actors linked to the GRU's cyber-operations arm, widely known by various nicknames such as Sandworm, APT44, and Microsoft's Seashell Blizzard cluster, are recalibrating their approach with noticeable precision as they approach their target market.
A group that once was renowned for exploiting zero-day vulnerabilities and newly disclosed ones with high-profile and disruptive effects, the group has now shifted into a quieter, yet equally strategic approach, systematically targeting weaknesses resulting from human and network misconfigurations rather than exploits resulting from cutting-edge techniques.
The analysis published by Amazon Threat Intelligence, based on findings obtained by Amazon’s Threat Intelligence division, illustrates this shift, revealing that the cluster is increasingly concentrating on exploiting incorrectly configured network edge devices, suggesting a deliberate move away from overt zero-day or zero-n-day intrusion techniques to the use of sustained reconnaissance and exploitation of exposed infrastructure at the digital perimeter, signaling an intentional shift away from overt zero-day or n-day intrusion techniques.
An intrusion campaign that lasted only a few weeks, but was exceptionally powerful, was uncovered in early October by investigators attributed to RomCom, a Russia-connected advanced persistent threat group that has also been identified by Storm 0978, Tropical Scorpius, and UNC2596.
The ESET cybersecurity researchers found malicious files on a Russian-managed server on October 8, and they traced the availability of these malicious files back to October 3, just five days before they were discovered by the researchers.
The technical analysis revealed that both of these files exploited two previously unknown zero-day vulnerabilities, one of which affected Mozilla browsers used both in Firefox and Tor environments, while the other was targeted at a Windows operating system vulnerability.
By combining these weaknesses, it became possible for RomCom to deliver a silent backdoor to any device accessing a compromised website without the visitor interacting with them, consenting to them, or even clicking a single button.
Although attackers initially had the capability of executing arbitrary code globally on a global scale, the exposure window remained narrow even though attackers had the capability. Romain Dumont, a malware researcher for ESET, noted that while the operation was constrained by quick defensive actions, highlighting that even though the vulnerabilities were severe, they were patched within days, sharply limiting the likelihood of mass compromises occurring.
A deliberate and multilayered attack chain was used to perpetrate the intrusion in a manner that was designed for both reach and discretion. It was the first part of the campaign where a browser-level vulnerability was exploited to gain access to a target computer by invoking it, and this setup created the conditions for a secondary breach that was made possible via a critical flaw within the Windows Task Scheduler service known as CVE-2024-49039.
An insufficient ability to handle permissions enabled malicious tasks to execute without being detected by security prompts or requiring the user's consent. As a result of linking the two vulnerabilities, the attackers were able to achieve a zero-click compromise by granting complete system control when a victim loaded a booby-trapped webpage, eliminating traditional interaction-based warnings.
There is a concealed PowerShell process in the payload that connects to a remote command server, downloads malware and deploys it aggressively in rapid succession, so the infection timeline can be compressed to near on-the-spot execution as a result.
As researchers noted, the initial distribution vector of the attack is unclear, but the operational design strongly emphasized automation, persistence, and a minimal forensic footprint, which reduced visible indications of compromise and complicated the investigation of the incident afterward.
There has been a continuous coordination of Russian-aligned cyber units across geopolitical targets during the same monitoring period, with the country of Ukraine experiencing most sustained pressure during the period.
Despite the fact that Gamaredon appears to have been linked with Russia's Federal Security Service and has been tracked by several security indices such as Primitive Bear, UNC530, and Aqua Blizzard, it continues to be the most active hacker targeting Ukrainian government networks. As well as improving malware obfuscation frameworks, the group deployed a cloud-enabled file stealer called PteroBox that used legitimate services like Dropbox to extract data.
Fancy Bear, a cyber-intelligence division of the GRU reportedly responsible for APT28, expanded Operation RoundPress at the same time, refining its exploitation of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities within webmail platforms.
The attacker leveraged the zero-day vulnerability in the MDaemon Email Server (CVE-2024-11182) to exploit the penetration of Ukrainian private-sector systems using a zero-day exploit.
One of the clusters linked to GRU, Sandworm, was also indexed under APT44 and has traditionally been associated with disruptive campaigns that targeted Ukrainian energy infrastructure, exploiting weaknesses in Active Directory Group Policies, which enabled it to deploy ZEROLOT, a new tool designed to destroy networks.
A parallel investment in high-impact exploit development was demonstrated at RomaCom, a company operating within a broader Russian-aligned threat ecosystem.
It chained zero-day vulnerabilities across widely used software platforms, including Firefox and Windows, confirming that zero-interaction intrusion methods are gaining traction, reinforcing the trend toward zero-interaction intrusion methods. In addition to putting these operations into a global context, ESET’s intelligence reports also identified persistent activity from state-backed groups in the context of the operations.
APT actors aligned with China, such as Mustang Panda, have continued a campaign against governments and maritime transportation companies by using Korplug loaders and weaponized USB vectors, while PerplexedGoblin has deployed the NanoSlate espionage backdoor against a government network in Central Europe.
The operations of North Korea-aligned threat actors, such as Kimsuky and Konni, increased significantly in early 2025 after a temporary decline in late 2024 as they shifted their attentions from South Korean institutions to in-country diplomatic personnel.
Andariel reappeared after nearly a year of being out of the game, when an industrial software provider in South Korea was breached, while DeceptiveDevelopment continued to conduct social engineering operations to spread the multi-platform WeaselStore malware.
This led to the spreading of fraudulent cryptocurrency and finance job postings, which enabled the malware to be distributed on multiple platforms.
The APT-C-60 group also uploaded to VirusTotal in late February 2025 a VHDX archive containing an encrypted downloader and a malicious shortcut, which is internally called RadialAgent and uploaded through a Japan-based submission to the web security company.
ESET's leadership explained that the disclosures were only a small portion of the intelligence data gathered during that period, however they did represent a broad tactical trajectory that was reflected in the disclosures. To increase the effectiveness of their operations, threat actors have increasingly prioritized stealth, infrastructure exposure, malware modularity, and long-range intrusion campaigns that align with active geopolitical fault lines in order to increase their operational efficiency.
It remains unclear how the exploit chain is likely to impact the victims as well as the precise scope of damages caused. The identities of the victims who may have been affected remain unclear. This underscores the difficulty of uncovering campaigns that are designed for speed and opacity.
A pronounced concentration of targets has been observed across North America and Europe based on ESET's telemetry. Investigators have been able to confirm this based on ESET's telemetry. The Czech Republic, France, Germany, Poland, Spain, Italy, and the United States are among the notable clusters, and New Zealand and French Guiana have been identified as having a smaller number of dispersed cases.
There was no evidence of compromise among any of the victims tracked by ESET that had used the Tor browser even though the exploit theoretically was capable of reaching users accessing the web from privacy-hardened environments. According to Damien Schaeffer, a senior malware researcher at ESET, it may have been the configuration differences between Tor and standard Firefox, particularly the default permission settings, that disrupted the exploit's execution path, an idea that is reinforced by the target profile of the exploit.
In the period between RomCom's activities and the period after it, it seemed that its activities were focused primarily on corporate networks and commercial infrastructure, environments that tended not to use Tor, limiting the exploit's viability in those channels. The two vulnerabilities in the chain, Mozilla's CVE-2024-9680 and Windows Task Scheduler's CVE-2024-49039, were remediated and fixed since then.
In the case of the attack, the payload was triggered by a permissions error in the Windows Task Scheduler service that caused it to connect to a remote command server and retrieve malicious software without generating security prompts or requiring the user to authorize the process.
This allowed the attack to execute.
Infections had a consistent exposure point - loading a compromised or counterfeit website - which led to the deployment sequence running to completion within seconds. There were very few observable indicators and it was very difficult to detect an endpoint once the infection had been installed. In the middle of October, Mozilla released browser patches for Firefox and Tor, followed by a Thunderbird security update on October 10.
The vulnerability disclosure was received about 25 hours after Thunderbird's security update was released.
A Microsoft security update on Windows was released on Nov. 12, which effectively ended the exploit chain, effectively severing any systemic exposure before it could be widespread.
As researchers have acknowledged, the original distribution vector used in seeding the infected URLs has yet to be identified, further raising concerns about the group's preference for automated campaigns over traceability campaigns.
It is important to note that even though the operation was ultimately limited by the rapid vendor response, cybersecurity specialists continue to emphasize the importance of routinely verifying software updates and to urge users and businesses to ensure that all necessary browser patches are applied. Additionally, industry experts are advocating a more rigorous validation of digital touchpoints, particularly in corporate environments, warning that infrastructure exposure, rather than novelty software, is increasingly becoming the weakest link in high-impact intrusion chains, which, if not removed, will lead to increased cyber-attacks.
As 2025 dawned on us, a stark reminder was in front of us that today's cyber conflict is no longer simply defined by the discovery of rare vulnerabilities, but by the strategic exploitation of overlooked ones, as well.
In spite of the fact that RomCom and the broader Russia-aligned threat ecosystem have been implicated in a number of incidents, operational success has become increasingly dependent on persistence, infrastructure visibility, and abuse of trust - whether through network misconfiguration, poisoned policy mechanisms, or malware distribution without interaction.
There has been a limited amount of disruption since Mozilla and Microsoft released their patches, but there remains some uncertainty around initial link distribution, victim identification, and possible data impact, which illustrates a broader truth: even short access to powerful exploit chains can have lasting consequences that go far beyond their lifetime.
There is a growing awareness among security experts that defense must evolve at the same pace as offense, so organizations should implement layered intrusion monitoring systems, continuous endpoint behavior analyses, stricter identity policy audits, and routinely verifying the integrity of software as a replacement for updating only providing security.
A greater focus on the external digital assets, supply chains, and risks of cloud exfiltration will be critical in the year to come. As a result of the threat landscape in 2025, there is clear evidence that resilience can be built not only by applying advanced tools, but also through disciplined configuration hygiene, rapid incident transparency, and an attitude towards security that anticipates rather than reacts to compromise.
