Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Showing posts with label Identity Theft. Show all posts

PayPal Subscriptions Exploited in Sophisticated Email Scam

 

Hackers have found a clever way to misuse PayPal's legitimate email system to send authentic looking phishing scams that are able to bypass security filters and look genuine to the end users.

Over the last few weeks, users are complaining that they are receiving emails from PayPal's legitimate address "service@paypal.com" informing that their automatic payment has expired. The emails successfully pass all the usual security checks such as DKIM and SPF authentication and have proved to be coming directly from PayPal’s mail servers. 

One of the reasons these messages are potent is that the scammers have altered the Customer Service URL to take users to their own websites from where they can see fake purchase notifications, claiming victims have purchased high-priced electronics such as MacBooks, iPhones, or Sony devices for USD 1,300 to 1,600.

The spam text message contains Unicode characters which can make the words bold or in different fonts, all this is to help to get round spam filters and keyword detection. Instead, the messages tell recipients to call a phony “PayPal support” phone number to cancel or dispute the alleged charges. 

BleepingComputer's analysis of logs and transactions shows that the PayPal Subscriptions feature is being abused by scammers. When merchants hold a subscriber's subscription, they can do so with their own mechanism, and PayPal, in turn, will notify subscribers via email. PayPal seems to be vulnerable to a subscription metadata attack - perhaps in an API or legacy platform - which lets attackers insert arbitrary text in the Customer Service URL field (it normally only accepts valid URLs). 

The scammers can forge emails and register a fake subscriber account for an email address associated with Google Workspace mailing list. When these accounts receive the notification from PayPal, the mailing list service sends what looks like a legitimate e-mail from PayPal to the list of "victims", making it looks more and more like a scam.

Safety measures

Recipients should ignore these emails and avoid calling the provided phone numbers. These tactics historically aim to facilitate bank fraud or trick victims into installing malware on their devices . PayPal confirmed awareness of the scam and recommends customers contact support directly through the official PayPal app or website if they suspect fraudulent activity. Users concerned about account compromise should log into their PayPal account directly rather than clicking email links to verify whether any unauthorized charges actually occurred.

Screen Sharing on WhatsApp Turns Costly with Major Financial Loss

 


Several disturbing patterns of digital deception have quietly developed in recent months, revealing just how readily everyday communications tools can be turned into instruments of financial ruin in an instant. According to security researchers, there has been an increase in sophisticated cybercriminal schemes utilizing the trust users place in familiar platforms, particularly WhatsApp, to gain access to the internet. 

It is a common occurrence that what initially starts out as a friendly message, an unexpected image, or a polite call claiming that an “urgent issue” with a bank account is a crafted scam which soon unravels into a meticulously crafted scam. It is very possible for malicious software to be installed through downloading an innocuous-looking picture that can allow you to infiltrate banking applications, harvest passwords, and expose personal identification information without your knowledge. 

There have been instances where fraudsters impersonating bank representatives have coaxed users into sharing their screens with the false pretense that they are resolving account discrepancy. When this has happened, these fraudsters can observe every detail in real time - OTP codes, login credentials, account balances - and in some cases, they will convince victims to install remote access programs or screen mirroring programs so they can further control the device. 

It is evident from the intertwined tactics that a troubling trend in digital crime has taken place, emphasizing the need for increased vigilance among Indians and beyond, underscoring a troubling development. There is a fast-growing network of social-engineering groups operating across multiple regions, who are utilizing WhatsApp's screen-sharing capabilities to bypass safety measures and gain control of their financial lives by manipulating their screen-sharing capabilities. 

Investigators have begun piecing together the contours of this network. Initially introduced in 2023 as a convenience feature, screen-sharing has since become a critical point of exploitation for fraudsters who place unsolicited video calls, pretend to be bank officials or service providers, and convince victims to reveal their screens, or install remote-access applications masquerading as diagnostic tools, to exploit their vulnerabilities. 

Almost $700,000 was defrauded by one victim in one of the cases of abuse that spanned from India and the U.K. to Brazil and Hong Kong. This demonstrates how swiftly and precisely these schemes emerge. In describing the technique, it is noted that it is not based on sophisticated malware, but rather on urgency, trust, and psychological manipulation, allowing scammers to circumvent a lot of traditional technical protections. 

Furthermore, criminal networks are enhancing their arsenals by spreading malicious files via WhatsApp Web, including one Brazilian operation that uses self-replicating payloads to hijack contacts, automate fraudulent outreach, and compromise online banking credentials through its use of malicious payloads distributed through WhatsApp Web. 

The investigators of the fraud note that the mechanisms are based less on technical sophistication and more on psychological pressure intended to disarm victims. An unsolicited WhatsApp video call made by a number that appears local can be the start of the scam, usually presented as a bank officer, customer service agent, or even an acquaintance in need of assistance. 

Callers claim to have an urgent problem to solve - an unauthorized transaction, an account suspension threat, or even an error in the verification process - that creates a feeling of panic that encourages their victims to comply without hesitation.

The imposter will initially convince the victim that the issue is being resolved, thereby leading to them sharing their screen or installing a legitimate remote-access application, such as AnyDesk or TeamViewer, which will enable the fraudster to watch every action that occurs on the screen in real time, as they pretend to resolve it. 

By using this live feed, an attacker can access one-time passwords, authentication prompts, banking app interfaces, as well as other sensitive credentials. By doing so, attackers can be able to take control of WhatsApp accounts, initiate unauthorized transfers, or coax the victim into carrying out these actions on their own.

A more elaborate variant consists of guiding the victim into downloading applications that secretly contain keyloggers or spyware that can collect passwords and financial information long after the call has ended, allowing them to collect it all. When scammers have access to personal information such as banking details or social media profiles, they can drain accounts, take over accounts on social networks, and assume the identity of victims to target others on their contact list.

Authorities caution that the success of these schemes depends on trust exploiting, so user vigilance is key. According to the advisories, individuals should be cautious when receiving unknown phone calls, avoid sharing screens with unknown parties, disable installations coming from untrusted sources, and refrain from opening financial apps when they are receiving remote access. 

These measures are crucial in order to prevent these social engineering scams from getting the better of them, as they continue to develop. As far as the most advanced variations of the scam are concerned, the most sophisticated versions of the scam entail criminals installing malicious software through deceptive links or media files in a victim's device, thus granting them complete control of that victim's computer. 

When these kinds of malware are installed, they can record keystrokes, capture screens, gather banking credentials, intercept two-factor authentication codes, and even gain access to sensitive identity documents. It is possible for attackers to take control of cameras and microphones remotely, which allows them to utilize the device as a tool for surveillance, coercion, or a long-term digital impersonation device. 

In addition to financial theft, the extent to which the compromised identity may be exploited goes far beyond immediate financial exploitation, often enabling blackmail and continuous abuse of the victim's identity. 

In light of this backdrop, cybersecurity agencies emphasize the significance of adopting preventative habits that can significantly reduce exposure to cybercriminals. There is still an important role to play in ensuring that users do not download unfamiliar media, disable WhatsApp's automatic download feature, and keep reputable mobile security tools up to date. 

WhatsApp still has the built-in features that allow them to block and report suspicious contacts, while officials urge individuals to spread basic cyber-hygiene knowledge among their communities, pointing out that many people fall victim to cyber-attacks simply because they lack awareness of the dangers that lurk. 

There has been a surge of fraud attempts across messaging platforms, and Indian authorities, including the Indian Cybercrime Coordination Centre, as well as various state cyber cells have issued a number of public advisories about this, and citizens are encouraged to report such attacks to the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal as soon as possible. 

In conjunction with these warnings, these findings shed light on a broader point: even the most ordinary digital interactions are capable of masking sophisticated threats, and sustained vigilance remains the strongest defense against the growing epidemic of social engineering and malware-driven crimes that are booming in modern society. 

As the majority of the fraud is carried out by social-engineering tactics, researchers have also observed a parallel wave of malware campaigns that are utilizing WhatsApp's broader ecosystem, which demonstrates how WhatsApp is capable of serving as a powerful channel for large-scale infection. As an example of self-replicating chains delivered through WhatsApp Web, one of the most striking cases was reported by analysts in Brazil. 

A ZIP archive was sent to the victims, which when opened, triggered the obfuscated VBS installer SORVEPOTEL, which was an obfuscated VBS installer. In this PowerShell routine, the malware used ChromeDriver and Selenium to re-enter the victim's active WhatsApp Web session, enabling the malware to take full control of the victim's active WhatsApp Web session. 

In order to spread the malware, the script retrieved message templates from a command-and-control server, exfiltrated the user's contact list, and automatically distributed the same malicious ZIP file to every network member that was connected with it—often while displaying a fake banner that said "WhatsApp Automation v6.0" to give it the appearance of legitimacy. 

Researchers found that Maverick was a payload that was evasive and highly targeted, and it was also accompanied by a suite of malicious capabilities. It was also packaged inside the ZIP with a Windows LNK file that could execute additional code through the use of a remote server that had the first stage loader on it. As soon as the malware discovered that the device was belonging to a Brazilian user, it launched its banking module only after checking for debugging tools, examining the system locale indicators such as the time zone and language settings. 

A Maverick server monitoring website activity for URLs linked to Latin American financial institutions, when activated, was aligned with credential harvesting and account manipulation against regional banks, aligning its behavior with credential harvesting. As Trend Micro pointed out previously, an account ban could be issued as a result of the sheer volume of outbound messages caused by a similar WhatsApp Web abuse vector, which relied on active sessions to mass-distribute infected ZIP files. 

These malware infections acted primarily as infostealers that targeted Brazilian banking and cryptocurrency platforms, thereby demonstrating the fact that financial fraud objectives can be easily mapped to WhatsApp-based lures when it comes to financial fraud. 

It is important to note, however, that security analysts emphasize that the global screen-sharing scams are not primarily the work of a single sophisticated actor, but rather the work of a diffuse criminal ecosystem that combines trust, urgency, and social manipulation to make them successful. According to ESET researchers, these tactics are fundamentally human-driven rather than based on technical exploits over a long period of time, whereas Brazilian malware operations show clearer signs of being involved in structured criminal activity. 

It is thought that the Maverick Trojan can be linked to the group that has been named Water Saci, whose operations overlap with those of the Coyote banking malware family-which indicates that these groups have been sharing techniques and developing tools within Brazil's underground cybercrime market. 

Even though the associations that have been drawn between WhatsApp and opportunistic scammers still seem to be rooted in moderate confidence, they reveal an evolving threat landscape in which both opportunistic scammers and organized cybercriminals work towards exploiting WhatsApp to their advantage. 

A number of analysts have indicated that the success of the scheme is a function of a carefully orchestrated combination of trust, urgency, and control. By presenting themselves as legitimate entities through video calls that appear to originate from banks, service providers, or other reliable entities, scammers achieve a veneer of legitimacy by appearing authentic.

In addition, they will fabricate a crisis – a fake transaction, a compromised account, or a suspended service – in order to pressure the victim into making a hasty decision. The last step is perhaps the most consequential: convincing the victim to share their screen with the attacker, or installing a remote access tool, which in effect grants the attacker complete access to the device. 

In the event that a phone is gained access to, then every action, notification, and security prompt becomes visible, revealing the phone as an open book that needs to be monitored. Security professionals indicate that preventative measures depend more on vigilance and personal precautions than on technical measures alone. 

Unsolicited calls should be treated with suspicion, particularly those requesting sensitive information or screen access, as soon as they are received, and any alarming claims should be independently verified through official channels before responding to anything unfounded. The use of passwords, OTPs, and banking information should never be disclosed over the telephone or through email, as legitimate institutions would not request such data in this manner. 

Installing remote access apps at the direction of unfamiliar callers should be avoided at all costs, given that remote access applications allow you to control your device completely. It is also recommended to enable WhatsApp's built-in two-step verification feature, which increases the security level even in the event of compromised credentials.

Finally, investigators emphasize that a healthy degree of skepticism remains the most effective defense; if we just pause and check it out independently, we may be able to prevent the cascading damage that these highly persuasive scams intend to cause us.

NordVPN Survey Finds Most Americans Misunderstand Antivirus Protection Capabilities

 

A new survey by NordVPN, one of the world’s leading cybersecurity firms, has revealed a surprising lack of understanding among Americans about what antivirus software actually does. The study, which polled over 1,000 U.S. residents aged 18 to 74, found that while 52% use antivirus software daily, many hold serious misconceptions about its capabilities — misconceptions that could be putting their online safety at risk. 

According to the findings, more than a quarter of respondents incorrectly believe that antivirus software offers complete protection against all online threats. Others assume it can prevent identity theft, block phishing scams, or secure public Wi-Fi connections — functions that go far beyond what antivirus tools are designed to do. NordVPN’s Chief Technology Officer, Marijus Briedis, said the confusion highlights a troubling lack of cybersecurity awareness. “People tend to confuse different technologies and overestimate their capabilities,” he explained. “Some Americans don’t realize antivirus software’s main job is to detect and remove malware, not prevent identity theft or data breaches. This gap in understanding shows how much more cybersecurity education is needed.” 

The survey also found that many Americans mix up antivirus software with other digital security tools, such as firewalls, password managers, ad blockers, and VPNs. This misunderstanding can create a false sense of security, leaving users vulnerable to attacks. Even more concerning, over one-third of those surveyed reported not using any cybersecurity software at all, despite nearly half admitting their personal information had been exposed in a data breach. 

NordVPN’s research indicates that many users believe following good online habits alone is sufficient protection. While best practices like avoiding suspicious links, using strong passwords, and steering clear of phishing attempts are important, experts warn they are not enough in today’s sophisticated cyber landscape. Modern malware can infect devices without any direct user action, making layered protection essential. 

Participants in the survey expressed particular concern about the exposure of sensitive personal data, such as social security numbers and credit card details. However, the most commonly leaked information remains email addresses, phone numbers, and physical addresses — details often dismissed as harmless but frequently exploited by cybercriminals. Such data enables more personalized and convincing phishing or “smishing” attacks, which can lead to identity theft and financial fraud. 

Experts emphasize that while antivirus software remains a critical first line of defense, it cannot protect against every cyber threat. A combination of tools — including secure VPNs, multi-factor authentication, and strong, unique passwords — is necessary to ensure comprehensive protection. A VPN like NordVPN encrypts internet traffic, hides IP addresses, and shields users from tracking and surveillance, especially on unsecured public networks. Multi-factor authentication adds an additional verification layer to prevent unauthorized account access, while password managers help users create and store complex, unique passwords safely. 

The key takeaway from NordVPN’s research is clear: cybersecurity requires more than just one solution. Relying solely on antivirus software creates dangerous blind spots, especially when users misunderstand its limitations. As Briedis put it, “This behavior undoubtedly contributes to the concerning cybersecurity situation in the U.S. Education, awareness, and layered protection are the best ways to stay safe online.” 

With cyberattacks and data breaches on the rise, experts urge Americans to take a proactive approach — combining trusted software, informed digital habits, and vigilance about what personal information they share online.

Qantas Data Leak Highlights Rising Airline Cyberattacks and Identity Theft Risks

 

Airlines continue to attract the attention of cybercriminals due to the vast amounts of personal data they collect, with passports and government IDs among the most valuable targets. According to privacy firm Incogni, the exposure of such documents poses a “severe, long-term identity theft risk” since they are difficult to replace and can be exploited for years in fraud schemes involving fake identities, counterfeit documents, and impersonation scams. 

The recent Qantas Airways data breach, claimed by the Scattered LAPSUS$ Hunters group, underscores the sector’s growing vulnerability. The stolen data included names, email addresses, Frequent Flyer details, and limited personal information such as phone numbers and birth dates. Fortunately, Qantas confirmed that no passport details, financial information, or credit card data were compromised. 

However, experts warn that even limited leaks can have serious consequences. “Attackers often combine personal identifiers like names and loyalty program details from multiple breaches to build complete identity profiles,” said Darius Belejevas, Head of Incogni. Such composite records can enable large-scale fraud even without financial data exposure. 

The Qantas incident also highlights the danger of third-party compromises. The breach reportedly stemmed from Salesforce social engineering and vendor vulnerabilities, illustrating how a single compromised supplier can have ripple effects across industries. Belejevas emphasized that “one compromised partner can expose millions of records in a single incident.” 

Data breaches in the airline industry are escalating rapidly. According to Cyble’s threat intelligence database, more than 20 airline-related breaches have been reported on the dark web in 2025 — a 50% increase from 2024. Much of this surge is attributed to coordinated attacks by Scattered Spider and the broader Scattered LAPSUS$ Hunters alliance, although other groups have also begun targeting the aviation sector. 

In a separate incident, the CL0P ransomware group claimed to have breached Envoy Air, a regional carrier of American Airlines. Envoy confirmed the intrusion but stated that no customer data was affected, only limited business information. In contrast, WestJet, which suffered a breach in June 2025, had passports and government-issued IDs exposed, prompting it to offer two years of free identity monitoring to affected customers. Incogni, however, warned that identity theft risks from such documents can persist well beyond two years. 

Experts urge travelers to take preventive security measures. Incogni recommends enrolling in identity theft monitoring, reporting phishing attempts to national anti-fraud agencies, using strong passwords with multi-factor authentication, and removing personal data from data broker sites. 

“Individuals and organizations must do more to safeguard sensitive data,” said Ron Zayas, CEO of Incogni. “In today’s world, data isn’t just being stolen by hackers — it’s also being misused by legitimate entities to manipulate outcomes.”

Qantas Faces Scrutiny After Massive Data Leak Exposes Millions of Customer Records

 



Qantas Airways is under investigation after personal data belonging to millions of its customers appeared online following a major cyberattack. The breach, which originated from an offshore call centre using Salesforce software, is believed to have exposed information from around 5.7 million individuals.

According to cybersecurity reports, the data was released after a criminal group known as Scattered LAPSUS$ Hunters followed through on a ransom threat. The leaked files reportedly include customers’ full names, email addresses, Frequent Flyer membership numbers, phone numbers, home and business addresses, dates of birth, and gender details. In some cases, even meal preferences were among the stolen data.

Although Qantas had outsourced customer support operations to an external provider, Australian officials emphasized that responsibility for data protection remains with the airline. “Outsourcing does not remove a company’s cybersecurity obligations,” warned Cyber Security Minister Tony Burke, who added that serious penalties may apply if organisations fail to meet legal requirements for safeguarding personal data.

Experts have cautioned customers not to search for the leaked information online, particularly on dark web platforms, to avoid scams or exposure to malicious content.

Cybersecurity researcher Troy Hunt explained that while the stolen data may not include financial details, it still poses serious risks of identity theft. “The information provides multiple points of verification that can be exploited for impersonation attacks,” he noted. Hunt added that Qantas would likely face substantial legal and financial repercussions from the incident, including class-action lawsuits.

RMIT University’s Professor Matthew Warren described the event as the beginning of a “second wave of scams,” predicting that fraudsters could impersonate Qantas representatives to trick customers into disclosing more information. “Attackers may contact victims, claiming to offer compensation or refunds, and request bank or card details,” he said. With most Qantas passengers being Australian, he warned, “a quarter of the population could be at risk.”

In response, Qantas has established a dedicated helpline and identity protection support for affected customers. The airline also secured a court injunction from the New South Wales Supreme Court to block access to the stolen data. However, this order only applies within Australia, leaving the information still accessible on some foreign websites where the databases were leaked alongside data from other companies, including Vietnam Airlines, GAP, and Fujifilm.

Legal experts have already lodged a complaint with the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, alleging that Qantas failed to take sufficient steps to protect personal information. Similar to previous high-profile breaches involving Optus and Medibank in 2022, the case may lead to compensation claims and regulatory fines.

Professor Warren emphasised that low conviction rates for cybercrimes continue to embolden hackers. “When attackers see few consequences, it reinforces the idea that cyber laws are not a real deterrent,” he said.


Data Breach at Bectu Exposes Members’ Information and Bank Details


 

Prospect, one of the UK's leading trade unions, has revealed that in June 2025, it was seriously affected by a cyberattack which had been discovered in the wake of a sophisticated cyberattack that had been launched against it. This underscores the sophistication and persistence of cyber attacks against professional bodies that are becoming ever more sophisticated. A significant part of the data that has been compromised is sensitive financial and personal data belonging to members of Prospect, the union affiliated with Prospect, and its member union, Bectu, a major representation body for professionals in the film and television industry in the country. 

Prospect, a national organisation of close to 160,000 engineers, scientists, managers, and specialists from companies including BT Group, Siemens, and BAE Systems, disclosed that the breach involved a considerable amount of confidential information from its members. Based on preliminary findings, it has been found that the attackers have accessed names, birthdates, contact information, bank account information, including sort codes, for over one year. 

Moreover, it has been suggested that data related to protected personal characteristics, including gender, race, religion, disability status, and employment status, may also have been compromised. A disclosure of this nature is not surprising considering that unions and membership-based organisations are increasingly relying on digital platforms for managing member records, communicating with members, and processing subscriptions – all of which make them attractive targets for cybercriminals who are looking for large quantities of personal information in bulk. 

Bectu Members Among the Most Affected

It is estimated that thousands of people, including Bectu, one of the largest unions in the UK representing professional workers in the film and television industries, as well as theatre and live entertainment, will be affected by this strike. The organisation, which operates under Prospect, acts as an important voice for screen and stage workers, from technicians to creative freelancers, as well as the production crew. A significant percentage of Bectu's approximately 40,000 members may have been affected by the breach, according to internal assessments. While it has not yet been officially confirmed how large a compromise was, early indications suggest that the attack may have exposed highly detailed personal information, leaving individuals open to the possibility that their data could be misused. There are several types of information that have been compromised in addition to bank account information and financial details, including addresses, phone numbers, and email accounts, as well as personal identifiers such as birth dates. The information, which includes diversity and equality statistics and individual case files - often used in representation and employment disputes - was also accessed in some instances. 

Timeline and Discovery of the Breach 

There was a report of a cyberattack that occurred in June 2025, however the full extent of the incident did not become apparent until a detailed forensic investigation of the incident in the months that followed. Prospect's General Secretary, Mike Clancy, formally notified members of the breach in October 2025 via email communications, explaining the nature of the breach, as well as the measures that were being taken to address it. After the incident occurred, Prospect has reported it to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), the police, and other relevant authorities. The company has also hired cybersecurity specialists to assist in the ongoing investigation, strengthen internal defences, and ensure that affected individuals receive information on how to safeguard their personal information. 

Prospect’s Official Response 

Michael Clancy, president of the company, issued an official statement addressing the incident in which he confirmed that internal investigations had confirmed that unauthorised access had been gained to the data of specific members. “This investigation is ongoing, but we have unfortunately identified that some member information was accessed during this incident. The evidence we have gathered has identified the members that we need to contact about an impact on their personal information. We have written to them with information on what this means for them and the support Prospect will provide to mitigate risk,” Clancy said.

Among the union's commitments to transparency and determination to assist affected members after the breach, the union stressed its commitment to transparency. Prospect will be offering a free 12-month credit and identity monitoring service as part of its response strategy to help safeguard members from potential financial fraud or identity theft caused by the stolen information as part of its response strategy. 

Cybersecurity Experts Warn of Growing Risks to Unions.  Several cybersecurity analysts have pointed out that trade unions, as well as professional associations, are becoming prime targets for data breaches due to the sheer amount of personal information they collect and store. Many unions, in contrast to corporations, do not have a lot of IT resources at their disposal, making them more vulnerable to sophisticated cyberattacks than other organisations. 

It is important to note that unions store an enormous amount of sensitive information - from payroll information to contact information to equality and disciplinary records. In addition to this, cybercriminals are highly interested in these types of data and can exploit or sell it for financial or political gain. Although the motives behind the Prospect breach remain unclear, investigators have not yet officially identified any specific threat actor responsible for the attack, despite similar incidents occurring in recent years having been linked to organised cybercrime groups that extort organisations or sell stolen data via dark web marketplaces in an attempt to profit. 

Regulatory and Legal Implications 

The UK Data Protection Act 2018 and the UK GDPR require Prospect to report significant data breaches to the Information Commissioner (ICO) and inform affected individuals “without undue delay.” As part of its review of the case, the ICO will examine whether appropriate data protection measures had been implemented before the incident and whether additional sanctions or guidance should have been issued in the future. 

There may be substantial penalties imposed on organisations which fail to implement sufficient cybersecurity safeguards, including a fine of up to £17.5 million or 4% of the company's global annual turnover, whichever is greater. There is, however, a significant difference between Prospect and other unions, which are typically nonprofit organisations, and regulatory authorities may instead concentrate on remediation, accountability, and security governance reform. 

Industry Repercussions and Member Concerns 

Many members of both Bectu and Prospect have expressed concern about the incident, since they work in sectors already confronted with job insecurity and issues relating to data privacy. A number of people have expressed concerns about the misuse of financial information or the possibility of targeted phishing attacks following the breach. 

Bectu members, whose professional lives are often based on freelance or contractual work, should be aware that any compromise of personal or banking details could lead to serious consequences for them. According to the union, members should be vigilant, monitor their bank accounts regularly, and report suspicious activity to the financial institution as soon as possible. 

In the opinion of industry observers, the reputational impact could extend far beyond the unions themselves. Due to the waning confidence in digital record-keeping systems, organisations are being urged to invest in stronger encryption, zero-trust network frameworks, and regular security audits in order to avoid similar incidents from occurring again. 

A Wake-Up Call for the Sector

A breach like this serves as an important reminder for all professional organisations that handle large amounts of member or employee data regularly. In an increasingly digitalised world, in which sensitive information is exchanged and stored online, robust cybersecurity measures are no longer optional — they are essential to maintaining trust and operational integrity in the digital age. 

 There has been a clear commitment by Prospect and Bectu to assist affected members, strengthen their IT infrastructure, and prevent future breaches as investigations continue. The outcome of the ICO’s review, which is expected to be completed later this year, may serve as a guide for how similar incidents are handled across the UK's trade union landscape going forward.

AI Turns Personal: Criminals Now Cloning Loved Ones to Steal Money, Warns Police

 



Police forces in the United Kingdom are alerting the public to a surge in online fraud cases, warning that criminals are now exploiting artificial intelligence and deepfake technology to impersonate relatives, friends, and even public figures. The warning, issued by West Mercia Police, stresses upon how technology is being used to deceive people into sharing sensitive information or transferring money.

According to the force’s Economic Crime Unit, criminals are constantly developing new strategies to exploit internet users. With the rapid evolution of AI, scams are becoming more convincing and harder to detect. To help people stay informed, officers have shared a list of common fraud-related terms and explained how each method works.

One of the most alarming developments is the use of AI-generated deepfakes, realistic videos or voice clips that make it appear as if a known person is speaking. These are often used in romance scams, investment frauds, or emotional blackmail schemes to gain a victim’s trust before asking for money.

Another growing threat is keylogging, where fraudsters trick victims into downloading malicious software that secretly records every keystroke. This allows criminals to steal passwords, banking details, and other private information. The software is often installed through fake links or phishing emails that look legitimate.

Account takeover, or ATO, remains one of the most common types of identity theft. Once scammers access an individual’s online account, they can change login credentials, reset security settings, and impersonate the victim to access bank or credit card information.

Police also warned about SIM swapping, a method in which criminals gather personal details from social media or scam calls and use them to convince mobile providers to transfer a victim’s number to a new SIM card. This gives the fraudster control over the victim’s messages and verification codes, making it easier to access online accounts.

Other scams include courier fraud, where offenders pose as police officers or bank representatives and instruct victims to withdraw money or purchase expensive goods. A “courier” then collects the items directly from the victim’s home. In many cases, scammers even ask for bank cards and PIN numbers.

The force’s notice also included reminders about malware and ransomware, malicious programs that can steal or lock files. Criminals may also encourage victims to install legitimate-looking remote access tools such as AnyDesk, allowing them full control of a victim’s device.

Additionally, spoofing — the act of disguising phone numbers, email addresses, or website links to appear genuine, continues to deceive users. Fraudsters often combine spoofing with AI to make fake communication appear even more authentic.

Police advise the public to remain vigilant, verify any unusual requests, and avoid clicking on suspicious links. Anyone seeking more information or help can visit trusted resources such as Action Fraud or Get Safe Online, which provide updates on current scams and guidance on reporting cybercrime.



Lost or Stolen Phone? Here’s How to Protect Your Data and Digital Identity

 



In this age, losing a phone can feel like losing control over your digital life. Modern smartphones carry far more than contacts and messages — they hold access to emails, bank accounts, calendars, social platforms, medical data, and cloud storage. In the wrong hands, such information can be exploited for financial fraud or identity theft.

Whether your phone is misplaced, stolen, or its whereabouts are unclear, acting quickly is the key to minimizing damage. The following steps outline how to respond immediately and secure your data before it is misused.


1. Track your phone using official recovery tools

Start by calling your number to see if it rings nearby or if someone answers. If not, use your device’s official tracking service. Apple users can access Find My iPhone via iCloud, while Android users can log in to Find My Device.

These built-in tools can display your phone’s current or last known location on a map, play a sound to help locate it, or show a custom message on the lock screen with your contact details. Both services can be used from another phone or a web browser. Avoid third-party tracking apps, which are often unreliable or insecure.


2. Secure your device remotely

If recovery seems unlikely or the phone may be in someone else’s possession, immediately lock it remotely. This prevents unauthorized access to your personal files, communication apps, and stored credentials.

Through iCloud’s “Mark as Lost” or Android’s “Secure Device” option, you can set a new passcode and display a message requesting the finder to contact you. This function also disables features like Apple Pay until the device is unlocked, protecting stored payment credentials.


3. Contact your mobile carrier without delay

Reach out to your mobile service provider to report the missing device. Ask them to suspend your SIM to block calls, texts, and data usage. This prevents unauthorized charges and, more importantly, stops criminals from intercepting two-factor authentication (2FA) messages that could give them access to other accounts.

Request that your carrier blacklist your device’s IMEI number. Once blacklisted, it cannot be used on most networks, even with a new SIM. If you have phone insurance, inquire about replacement or reimbursement options during the same call.


4. File an official police report

While law enforcement may not always track individual devices, filing a report creates an official record that can be used for insurance claims, fraud disputes, or identity theft investigations.

Provide details such as the model, color, IMEI number, and the time and place where it was lost or stolen. The IMEI (International Mobile Equipment Identity) can be found on your phone’s box, carrier account, or purchase receipt.


5. Protect accounts linked to your phone

Once the device is reported missing, shift your focus to securing connected accounts. Start with your primary email, cloud services, and social media platforms, as they often serve as gateways to other logins.

Change passwords immediately, and if available, sign out from all active sessions using the platform’s security settings. Apple, Google, and Microsoft provide account dashboards that allow you to remotely sign out of all devices.

Enable multi-factor authentication (MFA) on critical accounts if you haven’t already. This adds an additional layer of verification that doesn’t rely solely on your phone.

Monitor your accounts closely for unauthorized logins, suspicious purchases, or password reset attempts. These could signal that your data is being exploited.


6. Remove stored payment methods and alert financial institutions

If your phone had digital wallets such as Apple Pay, Google Pay, or other payment apps, remove linked cards immediately. Apple’s Find My will automatically disable Apple Pay when a device is marked as lost, but it’s wise to verify manually.

Android users can visit payments.google.com to remove cards associated with their Google account. Then, contact your bank or card issuer to flag the loss and monitor for fraudulent activity. Quick reporting allows banks to block suspicious charges or freeze affected accounts.


7. Erase your device permanently (only when recovery is impossible)

If all efforts fail and you’re certain the device won’t be recovered, initiate a remote wipe. This deletes all data, settings, and stored media, restoring the device to factory condition.

For iPhones, use the “Erase iPhone” option under Find My. For Androids, use “Erase Device” under Find My Device. Once wiped, you will no longer be able to track the device, but it ensures that your personal data cannot be accessed or resold.


Be proactive, not reactive

While these steps help mitigate damage, preparation remains the best defense. Regularly enable tracking services, back up your data, use strong passwords, and activate device encryption. Avoid storing sensitive files locally when possible and keep your operating system updated for the latest security patches.

Losing a phone is stressful, but being prepared can turn a potential disaster into a controlled situation. With the right precautions and quick action, you can safeguard both your device and your digital identity.