Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Rethinking Trust: The Case Against Blind Reliance on Antivirus Software

Avast fined $16.5M by FTC for secretly selling user data; users urged to rethink antivirus trust.

 


Most users would believe that the best antivirus programs are the most trustworthy type of software in the market, however, it turns out that perceptions can be deceiving and there is no such thing as a foolproof solution. 

As one of the most recognizable and widely used antivirus solutions for PCs, Avast has been found to have secretly collected and sold user data to third parties for the past six years to facilitate its revenue stream. 

Viruses on a computer are malicious pieces of software or hardware capable of replicating themselves on any drive that's similarly connected to your computer to actual viruses. A computer virus could slow down a user's computer as well as lead to its complete inability to function once it has been infected by one. 

The user's device may be infected with a virus if a removable media contains a virus, such as a USB stick, and they plug it into their device. As a result of sharing USBs with others or transferring files from an infected device to a user's device, the virus can also enter the device.

Furthermore, because software and applications are available for download from the internet, it is possible to infect their device with a virus. The bottom line is to ensure that when users transfer files from another device or the internet, they trust the source from which they received the files. 

It is also possible for a virus to infect a user's computer by opening a suspicious email, most likely from a spam folder, and clicking on a link or attachment on that email which contains a virus. Whenever users receive an email or attachment from a person they do not trust or have no idea about, make it a habit to not open it. 

After an investigation was completed, the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) decided to fine Avast $16.5 cardinal for its violation of the law, and they banned them from doing the same thing in the future. 

If the user does not use Avast, their information may still have been compromised even if they do not have the software installed on their computer. In each autumn, there are distinct programs that are grouped together under the above umbrella to form the Arsenic locations.

It was reported by the Federal Trade Commission that Jumpshot, an Avast subsidiary (that had been "voluntarily closed" in February of 2020), was selling users' browsing information to a total of 100 different businesses between 2014 and January 2020. 

The FTC discovered that Jumpshot had acquired 8 petabytes (8.000 terabytes) of browsing data throughout its existence. In the information, there were things that not even a rogue antivirus would ever try to bring in front of corporations, including specific arsenic accusations regarding health and aesculapian status, beliefs about politics, government relations, finances, and others. 

In February, PCMag and Motherboard (Vice) published an investigation regarding Avast trading personification data in their publications, and the institution stated in their report that the identifying allegations were stripped from the data before it was sold on the market to third parties. Jumpshot, in addition, had engagements with prominent advertising entities like Lotame and Omnicom. 

These agreements allowed Jumpshot to correlate data from various sources, thereby facilitating the identification of individual users. Samuel Levine, who holds the position of Head of the Federal Trade Commission's Bureau of Consumer Protection, conveyed in an official statement, “Avast assured users that its products would safeguard the privacy of their browsing data; however, the reality was quite the opposite. 

Avast’s deceptive surveillance practices not only compromised consumers’ privacy but also contravened the law.” Gen Digital, the parent company of Avast, is associated with various products focused on internet and PC security. This product lineup encompasses Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, Reputation Defender, CCleaner, Recuva, Speccy, and Defraggler. Apart from the imposed $16.5 million fine and stringent directives against selling or licensing collected user data for advertising purposes, Avast is obligated to notify affected users about the prior sale of their data.
Share it:

antivirus software

Avast

Cyber Attacks

CyberCrime

Cyberhackers

Cybersecurity