Rome’s La Sapienza University is continuing to experience major operational disruption after a cyber intrusion forced administrators to take its digital infrastructure offline as a safety measure. The shutdown began on February 2 and has affected core online services used by students, faculty, and administrative staff.
Since the incident, students have been unable to complete basic academic and administrative tasks such as registering for examinations, viewing tuition-related records, or accessing official contact information for teaching staff. With internal platforms unavailable, the university has relied mainly on its social media channels to share updates. These notices have acknowledged the disruption but have not provided detailed technical explanations or a confirmed date for when full access will be restored.
University officials confirmed that their systems were deliberately powered down to contain the threat and to prevent malicious software from spreading to other parts of the network. Emergency shutdowns of this kind are typically used when there is a risk that an attack could compromise additional servers, user accounts, or stored data. This response suggests that the incident involved harmful software capable of moving across connected systems.
According to publicly available reporting, the disruption was caused by ransomware, a category of cyber attack in which criminals attempt to lock organizations out of their own systems or data. Some media sources have claimed that a newly observed cybercrime group may be linked to the breach and that a ransomware variant referred to in security research as Bablock, also known as Rorschach, may have been involved. These attributions are part of ongoing assessments and have not been formally confirmed by authorities.
Technical analyses cited in public reporting describe this malware family as drawing components from previously leaked cybercrime tools, allowing attackers to combine multiple techniques into a single, highly disruptive program. Such ransomware is designed to operate rapidly and can spread across large digital environments, which helps explain the scale of the disruption experienced by one of Europe’s largest universities by student enrollment.
The university has formally reported the incident to Italian law enforcement and to the National Cybersecurity Agency, both of which are now involved in the investigation and response. Administrators have stated that emergency management is being coordinated across academic offices, administrative departments, and student representatives, with discussions underway to introduce deadline extensions and flexible arrangements to limit academic harm.
Due to the ongoing shutdown of internal systems, campus information desks are currently unable to access digital records that would normally support student inquiries. Updates about service availability and office hours are being shared through official faculty social media pages.
Meanwhile, technical teams are examining the full scope of the breach before restoring systems from backups. This step is necessary to ensure that no malicious code remains active. It is still unclear whether all stored data can be fully recovered or whether some information may remain inaccessible following the attack.
Mohan noted that the creator economy is another area of concern. According to YouTube's CEO, video producers will discover new revenue streams this year. The suggestions made include fan funding elements like jewelry and gifts, which will be included in addition to the current Super Chat, as well as shopping and brand bargains made possible by YouTube.
The business also hopes to grow YouTube Shopping, an affiliate program that lets content producers sell goods directly in their videos, shorts, and live streams. The business stated that it will implement in-app checkout in 2026, enabling users to make purchases without ever leaving the site.
Security researchers have identified a previously undocumented cyber espionage group that infiltrated at least 70 government and critical infrastructure organizations across 37 countries within the past year. The same activity cluster also conducted wide-scale scanning and probing of government-related systems connected to 155 countries between November and December 2025, indicating a broad intelligence collection effort rather than isolated attacks.
The group is tracked as TGR-STA-1030, a temporary designation used for actors assessed to operate with state-backed intent. Investigators report evidence of activity dating back to January 2024. While no specific country has been publicly confirmed as the sponsor, technical indicators suggest an Asian operational footprint. These indicators include the services and tools used, language and configuration preferences, targeting patterns tied to regional interests, and working hours consistent with the GMT+8 time zone.
Who was targeted and what was taken
Confirmed victims include national law enforcement and border agencies, finance ministries, and departments responsible for trade, natural resources, and diplomatic affairs. In several intrusions, attackers maintained access for months. During these periods, sensitive data was taken from compromised email servers, including financial negotiations, contract material, banking information, and operational details linked to military or security functions.
How the intrusions worked
The initial entry point commonly involved phishing messages that led recipients to download files hosted on a legitimate cloud storage service. The downloaded archive contained a custom loader and a decoy file. The malware was engineered to avoid automated analysis by refusing to run unless specific environmental conditions were met, including a required screen resolution and the presence of the decoy file. It also checked for the presence of selected security products before proceeding.
Once active, the loader retrieved additional components disguised as image files from a public code repository. These components were used to deploy a well known command and control framework to manage compromised systems. The repository linked to this activity has since been taken down.
Beyond phishing, the group relied on known vulnerabilities in widely used enterprise and network software to gain initial access. There is no indication that previously unknown flaws were used. After entry, the attackers employed a mix of command and control tools, web shells for remote access, and tunneling utilities to move traffic through intermediary servers.
Researchers also observed a Linux kernel level implant that hides processes, files, and network activity by manipulating low level system functions. This tool concealed directories with a specific name to avoid detection. To mask their operations, the attackers rented infrastructure from legitimate hosting providers and routed traffic through additional relay servers.
Analysts assess that the campaign focuses on countries with active or emerging economic partnerships of interest to the attackers. The scale, persistence, and technical depth of these operations highlight ongoing risks to national security and essential public services, and reinforce the need for timely patching, email security controls, and continuous monitoring across government networks.
Threat actors are targeting Fortinet FortiGate devices via automated attacks that make rogue accounts and steal firewall settings info.
The campaign began earlier this year when threat actors exploited an unknown bug in the devices’ single-sign-on (SSO) option to make accounts with VPN access and steal firewall configurations. This means automation was involved.
Cybersecurity company Arctic Wolf discovered this attack and said they are quite similar to the attacks it found in December after the reveal of a critical login bypass flaw (CVE-2025-59718) in Fortinet products.
The advisory comes after a series of reports from Fortinet users about threat actors abusing a patch bypass for the bug CVE-2025-59718 to take over patched walls.
Impacted admins complaint that Fortinet said that the latest FortiOS variant 7.4.10 doesn't totally fix the authentication bypass bug, which should have been fixed in December 2025.
Fortinet also plans on releasing more FortiOS variants soon to fully patch the CVE-2025-59718 security bug.
Following an SSO login from cloud-init@mail.io on IP address 104.28.244.114, the attackers created admin users, according to logs shared by impacted Fortinet customers. This matches indications of compromise found by Arctic Wolf during its analysis of ongoing FortiGate attacks and prior exploitation the cybersecurity firm noticed in December.
Turn off FortiCloud SSO to prevent intrusions.
Admins can temporarily disable the vulnerable FortiCloud login capability (if enabled) by navigating to System -> Settings and changing "Allow administrative login using FortiCloud SSO" to Off. This will help administrators safeguard their firewalls until Fortinet properly updates FortiOS against these persistent assaults.
You can also run these commands from the interface:
"config system global
set admin-forticloud-sso-login disable
end"
Internet security watchdog Shadowserver is investigating around 11,000 Fortinet devices that are vulnerable to online threats and have FortiCloud SSO turned on.
Additionally, CISA ordered federal agencies to patch CVE-2025-59718 within a week after adding it to its list of vulnerabilities that were exploited in attacks on December 16.
Spain’s Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities has temporarily disabled parts of its digital infrastructure following what it described as a technical problem. The disruption has affected several online services used by citizens, universities, researchers, and businesses for official procedures and submissions. These platforms support important administrative functions and process sensitive information, which is why access was restricted as a precaution.
The ministry oversees national science policy, research programs, innovation initiatives, and higher education administration. Its systems handle high-value data, including academic and research records, application materials, and personal information linked to students and professionals. Because of the incident, multiple digital services were made unavailable, and active procedures were placed on hold to limit any potential risk to data or system integrity.
In a public notice on its official website, the ministry stated that the incident is under technical assessment and did not disclose further details at the time. The announcement clarified that the ministry’s online portal is only partially operational and that ongoing administrative processes have been paused to protect the rights and lawful interests of affected users. To reduce the impact of the outage, authorities confirmed that deadlines for affected procedures will be extended in line with Spain’s administrative law provisions, so applicants and institutions are not penalized for delays caused by the shutdown.
Separately, claims surfaced on underground online platforms from an individual alleging unauthorized access to the ministry’s systems. The person shared what they presented as sample data to support the claim and stated that additional information was available for sale. The material reportedly includes personal records, email information, application-related documents, and images of official paperwork. These claims have not been independently verified, and the online space where the samples were shared later became inaccessible.
The same individual alleged that access was gained by exploiting a security weakness that can allow users to reach restricted resources without proper authorization. Such flaws, when present in web applications, can expose internal systems if not properly secured. At this stage, the technical details of the claim remain unconfirmed by authorities.
Spanish media outlets have reported that a ministry spokesperson acknowledged that the service disruption is linked to a cybersecurity incident. However, officials have not confirmed whether any data was accessed or taken, nor have they outlined the scope of any potential compromise. The ministry has indicated that investigations are ongoing to determine what occurred and to restore services safely.
Cybersecurity experts consistently warn that public sector systems are frequent targets because of the volume and sensitivity of data they manage. Strong access controls, continuous monitoring, and timely security updates are critical to reducing exposure to such risks. Further updates from the ministry are expected once technical assessments are completed and the situation is fully clarified.
In reaction to previous protests, Iranian authorities implemented a nationwide internet shutdown on this day, which probably indicates that even government-affiliated cyber units did not have the internet.
The new activity was spotted on 26 January 2026 while the gang was setting up its new C2 servers, one day prior to the Iranian government’s internet restrictions. This suggests that the threat actor may be state-sponsored and supported by Iran.
Infy is one of the many state-sponsored hacking gangs working out of Iran infamous for sabotage, spying, and influence campaigns coordinated with Tehran’s strategic goals. However, it also has a reputation for being the oldest and less famous gangs staying under the radar and not getting caught, working secretly since 2004 via “laser-focused” campaigns aimed at people for espionage.
The use of modified versions of Foudre and Tonnerre, the latter of which used a Telegram bot probably for data collection and command issuance, were among the new tradecraft linked to the threat actor that SafeBreach revealed in a report released in December 2025. Tornado is the codename for the most recent version of Tonnerre (version 50).
The report also revealed that threat actors replaced the C2 infrastructure for all variants of Tonnerre and Foudre and also released Tornado variant 51 that employs both Telegram and HTTP for C2.
It generates C2 domain names using two distinct techniques: a new DGA algorithm initially, followed by fixed names utilizing blockchain data de-obfuscation. We believe that this novel method offers more flexibility in C2 domain name registration without requiring an upgrade to the Tornado version.
Experts believe that Infy also abused a 1-day security bug in WinRAR to extract the Tornado payload on an infected host to increase the effectiveness of its attacks. The RAR archives were sent to the Virus Total platform from India and Germany in December 2025. This means the two countries may have been victims.