Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

North Korean Hackers Drain $6.3 Billion from Binance in Record-Breaking Crypto Theft

 



Hackers tied to North Korea stole roughly $6.36 billion from Binance on Wednesday, stripping the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange of funds across ten blockchains in a heist that blockchain intelligence firms are calling the largest crypto theft in history.

The attack, which began at 8:05 p.m. UTC on October 29, moved faster than most exchange security teams could respond. The bulk of the money was gone within 20 minutes.

Binance suspended deposits and withdrawals shortly after detecting the breach and said user funds would be covered in full. "Investigating a potential security issue," the exchange wrote in an early-evening post, adding that user assets were safe. By late that night, a coalition of blockchain infrastructure firms had frozen roughly $3 billion of the stolen assets, though more than $2.4 billion remained in the attacker's control as of press time.


How They Got In

Blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs, which traced the attack in near real-time, said the intrusion bore the hallmarks of TraderTraitor, the North Korean state-sponsored hacking unit that the FBI also attributed to February's $1.5 billion Bybit breach.

The preparation started at least 36 hours before the theft. TRM Labs found that the attackers funded an operator wallet with small withdrawals from Tornado Cash, a crypto mixing service, then ran test transactions across wallets they controlled. In the day before the main theft, the attackers rehearsed the final version of their code on a third wallet before installing it on a live Binance hot wallet.

The technical method on Ethereum was particularly precise. The attackers used EIP-7702, an account delegation feature introduced in a recent Ethereum upgrade, to effectively convert a Binance hot wallet into a sweeper they controlled. A single transaction carried 50 pre-signed authorizations; one matched the wallet's transaction count exactly, granting the attackers the ability to sweep new incoming deposits for hours after the initial theft, all the way until 11:56 p.m. UTC.

On nine other blockchains, including Bitcoin, Tron, XRP Ledger, Solana, Arbitrum, and several Ethereum layer-2 networks, wallets sent funds through standard signed transfers during the same window. TRM's analysis concluded the most likely explanation was that the attacker had somehow obtained the ability to instruct Binance's hot wallet signing infrastructure to authorize transactions of their choosing. Binance has not yet published a root cause analysis.


What Was Taken

The breakdown by chain is staggering. Ethereum accounts for the largest slice: about $3.79 billion, including 200,630 ETH and roughly 1.875 billion USDT. Bitcoin follows with 18,270 BTC worth approximately $1.47 billion. Tron contributed about $628 million, primarily USDT, and XRP Ledger added 233 million XRP worth around $296 million. The remaining losses were spread across Solana, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Avalanche, and Polygon.

At those figures, the theft dwarfs every previous crypto hack on record by a considerable margin. The Bybit breach in February 2025, which itself broke every prior record, involved $1.5 billion. This attack is roughly four times larger.


The Freeze Race

Within hours of the theft, stablecoin issuers and blockchain governance bodies began freezing assets. Tether moved first, blacklisting 971 million USDT across wallets traced to the attacker at 9:01 p.m. UTC. Circle followed three minutes later with a freeze on $823 million in USDC, acting in coordination with law enforcement. Ripple froze 40.5 million RLUSD at 10:01 p.m. The Arbitrum Security Council executed forced transfers of 8,426 ETH and 74.6 million ARB tokens after midnight.

By 11:35 p.m. UTC, Binance said the verified total of frozen assets had reached $2.54 billion. TRM Labs placed the figure closer to $2.7 billion by 12:30 a.m. the following morning.

The attacker, however, moved quickly to convert portions of the stolen funds. Some USDT was swapped for ETH at a discount of more than 10%, and the attacker used Aave, a decentralized lending protocol, to borrow ETH against frozen stablecoin positions. As of the morning of October 30, the attacker still held more than 420,000 ETH and all 18,270 BTC, assets beyond the reach of any issuer's freeze function.


North Korea's Crypto Playbook

The FBI said it was aware of the incident and working with partners to assess the activity. The U.S. Secret Service had not responded to a request for comment at time of publication.

The timing fits a pattern that intelligence analysts have tracked closely. Chainalysis reported that North Korean operatives stole about $2 billion in cryptocurrency throughout 2025. TRM Labs found that two North Korea-linked groups accounted for three-quarters of all crypto hack losses in the first quarter of 2026 alone. The funds are widely believed to support Pyongyang's weapons programs, which have been cut off from conventional financial markets through international sanctions.

TRM Labs said it expects the attacker to route remaining funds through cross-chain bridges, swap services, and over-the-counter brokers in the coming weeks, and said it was monitoring those flows in real time.



Cyberattack Clouds Political Spending Transparency in America

 

A cyberattack targeting the United States Federal Election Commission disrupted access to campaign finance disclosures shortly before the November 3 midterm elections, prompting concerns about electoral transparency. The commission suspended its filing systems for approximately 41 hours after an unidentified malicious actor attempted to gain access. This interruption prevented campaigns and political organizations from submitting certain time-sensitive financial reports, temporarily limiting public oversight of election funding. The incident concerned financial disclosure infrastructure; the available information did not establish any interference with voting systems or election results. 

The disruption affected disclosures ordinarily required within 24 or 48 hours, producing an information gap during a particularly consequential period of campaign activity. Millions of dollars in political financing may have remained outside immediate public scrutiny while the systems were unavailable. Nevertheless, delayed reporting does not demonstrate that contributions were permanently concealed or that donors deliberately exploited the interruption. Limited public information about the attacker, the techniques employed, and the underlying motive prevented definitive conclusions regarding the incident’s origins, scope, or broader political implications and consequences. 

Transparency advocates emphasized that the timing substantially increased the significance of the outage. OpenSecrets executive director Hilary Braseth argued that delayed disclosure undermines meaningful public access to campaign finance information. Research director Brendan Glavin indicated that political spending before the interruption had reached approximately $50 million per day. At that scale, even a relatively brief suspension can impede efforts by journalists, researchers, and voters to identify financial interests behind election messaging. Information disclosed after voting may have less practical value for assessing candidates and their supporters. 

The incident also renewed attention to SuperPACs and technology interests seeking to influence public policy through election spending. Political organizations supporting artificial intelligence development have invested substantial resources in promoting sympathetic candidates and challenging opponents. These activities coincide with disputes over data center construction, local infrastructure pressures, and potential regulatory restrictions. Electoral outcomes may therefore affect both technology policy and future investment decisions. Such connections underscore the importance of prompt financial disclosure, but they provide no basis for attributing responsibility for the cyberattack to these interests. 

Speculation that the outage facilitated undisclosed political contributions remained unsubstantiated. Political spending researcher Molly White expressed concern about diminished visibility into rapidly increasing expenditures while acknowledging uncertainty surrounding the incident. The episode demonstrates that effective campaign finance oversight depends on resilient reporting infrastructure as well as legal disclosure requirements. Authorities must therefore balance cybersecurity precautions with the need to maintain accessible public records. Reliable systems, timely reporting, and clear communication are essential to preserving scrutiny when voters are preparing to make consequential decisions about political representation.

U.S. Data Centers Face Security Risks From Physical Attacks, Insiders and AI-Powered Hackers

 

Attacks on data centers in other countries are raising concerns about the security of similar facilities in the United States. Although American data centers are unlikely to face the same kind of military strikes seen overseas, cybersecurity experts warn that they remain vulnerable to physical intrusions and cyberattacks. Earlier this week, Ukraine targeted Russian data centers. 

In March, the Iranian military struck Amazon data centers in the United Arab Emirates, leaving the affected facilities out of service for several months. Charles Brooks, an adjunct lecturer in cybersecurity at Georgetown University, told Mashable that data centers are valuable targets because so much of modern life depends on them. Everyday activities such as watching Netflix, using Google Docs and accessing online banking services rely on servers housed in these facilities. 

Data centers also support cloud services used by government agencies, hospitals, financial institutions and businesses, as well as communications between Earth and space. This makes them attractive to state-backed hackers and criminal groups seeking sensitive information or attempting to disrupt essential services. Brooks warned that a serious breach could have catastrophic consequences. He identified three major security concerns for American data centers. 

The first is physical security. Although a drone-powered attack is considered unlikely, facilities could still face attacks involving explosives or unauthorized physical access. Even limited damage could serve as a symbolic victory for terrorist groups or organizations opposed to AI infrastructure. Brooks said security measures should extend beyond surveillance cameras, alarms and barbed-wire fences. He recommended stronger perimeter defenses, security guards and protected areas around sensitive sections, including control centers and water-cooling systems. 

The second concern is the threat posed by insiders. Employees with authorized access to servers and infrastructure could expose sensitive information, reveal security weaknesses or interfere with operations. This could involve a disgruntled worker, someone recruited by an adversary or an employee who makes a costly mistake. Brooks recommended rigorous background checks comparable to those conducted for staff at hospitals and power plants. He also suggested AI-powered surveillance to identify unusual employee behavior, arguing that the potential security benefits could justify occasional false alarms. 

The third threat comes from AI-assisted hacking. Artificial intelligence can help attackers automate cyber operations, identify weaknesses and expand espionage campaigns. Brooks pointed to an Anthropic security report describing how individuals, including foreign government-backed actors, have used AI to automate cyber spying. Hackers could use these tools to scan for vulnerabilities in data center systems or launch phishing attacks against employees to steal login credentials. 

AI allows attackers to conduct these operations at greater scale and identify weaknesses more efficiently. Brooks said protecting data centers should be treated as a national security priority. A breach may not be immediately apparent to the public, but its effects could disrupt businesses, prevent people from working or expose personal information through ransomware attacks. He argued that stronger security requires cooperation between government agencies and the private companies that own and operate these facilities.

Trojanized Claude Code Extension on Cursor Marketplace Exposes Users to SSH Backdoor


The Cursor IDE extension marketplace was flooded with modified versions of Anthropic's official Claude Code extension, exposing developers to a persistent SSH backdoor. This malicious package, version 2.1.313, appeared to be a legitimate update as opposed to a separate malicious application as it was published under the legitimate extension identity, making it appear to be an authentic update. 

A report was issued on October 29, 2026, following the discovery of the compromised extension installing an attacker-controlled SSH key, establishing remote access, and maintaining persistence on affected systems. According to Cursor, the malicious version was accessible for approximately 11 hours from 2:27am to 1:35pm Pacific Time. 

The company estimates that up to 5,000 users could have been affected. 66 lines of JavaScript code were inserted into the main code bundle of the extension by the attackers. The malicious component was designed to execute before the extension's normal functions, allowing it to perform unauthorized activities without requiring any suspicious interaction from users. 

Despite the extension's continued normal operation, the injected code attempted to modify system files and establish connections with attacker-controlled infrastructure in order to alter the extension's behavior. According to researchers, the compromised package was distributed by Cursor under the legitimate extension identifier of Anthropic, anthropic.claude-code. This incident was particularly concerning because the malicious update appeared as an authentic publisher rather than as a mere imitation. 

It remains unclear how the unauthorized package was introduced. Based on Microsoft Threat Intelligence's confirmation, the malicious versions have not been distributed via Microsoft's official Visual Studio Marketplace or Anthropic's npm package. Furthermore, Anthropic confirmed that the company had not been compromised and did not develop the malicious package. Based on the available evidence, Cursor's extension marketplace was the focus of the incident. 

The injectable loader attempted to modify the victim's authorized_keys file to include an SSH public key labelled "svc-telemetry". This modification was intended to enable the attacker to access the affected user's account via SSH. In addition to enabling local SSH services and establishing reverse SSH tunnels to external servers 134.209.82[.]225, the malware also attempted to maintain access to the external server. This was accomplished by incorporating separate persistence mechanisms for Windows, Linux, and macOS, which allowed the backdoor connection to be restarted depending on the platform's startup configurations. 

Additionally, the malicious payload collected information that could allow attackers to identify valuable developer environments by using system information. There was a collection of information on the device hostname, logged-in username, operating system, CPU architecture, home directory, the current working directory, public IP address, and the global Git email configuration. There were also up to 40 environment variables named KEY, TOKEN, SECRET, PASS, AWS and GCP, which contained up to 400 terms. 

Even though the initial beacon did not transmit the values for these variables, this information can be used to identify what cloud services, development platforms and credential types are on a compromised system. As well as sending data to the attacker-controlled server at 134.209.82[.]225:8099/beacon, the loader attempted to send a request to a local loopback address as well. 

It has been determined that the attacker's infrastructure has been permanently shut down with the assistance of its hosting provider, which prevents further communication through the reported server. However, the shutdown does not remove malicious files or persistence mechanisms that are already installed on affected systems. However, researchers have not identified any additional payloads, despite the possibility of attackers executing commands and transferring files via a successful SSH tunnel.

It was later clarified that two malicious versions of the software were released through Cursor's marketplace for Windows and macOS, respectively, during the exposure period of October 29 between 2:27 a.m. and 1:35 p.m. Pacific Time. According to the company, up to 5,000 users may have been affected. They will be contacted directly by the company. Cursor temporarily shut down its marketplace while investigating the incident following discovery of the affected packages. 

A thorough audit of marketplace access by the company revealed no evidence of tampered with other extensions. After rotating the keys of the marketplace and rebuilding the marketplace, the company was able to restore service. Anthropic also confirmed that its official distribution channels and systems were not compromised. 

The extension 2.1.314 was then released through Open VSX and Microsoft's Visual Studio Marketplace. However, Microsoft's Security teams have warned that simply uninstalling it is not sufficient to stop the threat. Scripts, scheduled tasks, cron entries, LaunchAgent files and unauthorized SSH keys marked svc-telemetry should be checked on affected systems. 

When evidence of malicious activity is present, systems should be isolated and confirmed malicious components removed after relevant evidence has been preserved. Additionally, organizations are being advised to review endpoint, network, and authentication logs in order to identify suspicious connections and activity involving SSH. Credentials and active sessions accessed from affected machines should be rotated or revoked from trusted devices.

Whenever unauthorized access is confirmed or its security cannot be restored, it may be necessary to rebuild the system. This incident adds to the series of attacks targeting trusted developer tools in the software supply chain. This follows the attack on OVHcloud's official command-line interface that resulted in the replacement of legitimate release binary packages with malware containing secret stealing features. The combined effect of these incidents demonstrates the risks associated with tampered software updates distributed through otherwise reputable channels.

Hacktivists Dump Records of 41,000 DHS Employees, Citing ICE Escalation

 



A hacktivist group has published internal records identifying more than 41,000 Department of Homeland Security employees and contractors, in what security researchers are calling one of the most detailed government workforce exposures in recent memory.

The group, which calls itself the "Department of Peace," shared the data with Distributed Denial of Secrets (DDoSecrets), a nonprofit that publishes leaked government datasets, and with Swiss hacker-journalist maia arson crimew. The records went public on October 29 and cover staff across nine DHS agencies.

The group tied the release directly to DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin's July 17 comments, in which he told reporters he was "turning up the heat" on immigration enforcement. That remark, the group said, was the trigger.


What the data contains

The leaked dataset holds 41,191 records spanning employees and contractors across nine DHS sub-agencies, pulled from nearly 7,000 offices and more than 2,200 locations. Each record contains names, job titles, supervisor relationships, direct reports, employment status, workplace addresses, email addresses, phone numbers, and internal group memberships.

CBP accounts for the largest share with 21,329 records, followed by ICE at 6,598 and USCIS at 6,245. Homeland Security Investigations holds 3,421 records, DHS headquarters 1,755, and CISA 980. The Federal Protective Service, FLETC, and the Science and Technology Directorate account for the remainder. Combined, the exposed records represent roughly one-fifth of DHS's reported headcount of 222,538, according to the DOGE website. CISA records were pulled from the public-facing search results but remain in the underlying dataset.


The Icepick tool

Crimew, who faces a U.S. federal indictment tied to prior leaks, built a searchable interface called "Icepick" and hosted it at icepi.cx. The domain registrar pulled the site down shortly after launch. DDoSecrets responded by releasing the tool's source code publicly. By Thursday morning, the searchable site was offline, but the data itself continued to circulate.

DDoSecrets co-founder Emma Best said the dataset extends well beyond contact information. The records, she wrote, identify officials overseeing covert and undercover operations, the government's internal effort to track down leakers, and the now-defunct BlueLeaks investigation. Crimew described it as "a complete game changer for anyone investigating DHS" and said it "provides FOIA material for years to come."

Ryan Shapiro of Property of the People, a government transparency organization, offered a narrower read, noting that staff contact information could prove useful for Freedom of Information Act requests.


Okta in the spotlight

The Department of Peace claimed the data came from an Okta single sign-on service used internally at DHS. Okta said it reviewed the report and found no evidence that its systems or data had been affected.

That denial has not fully closed the question. CyberScoop verified that numerous active CISA employees appear in the dataset alongside former agency leaders who left government years ago. The records also reference internal groups tied to COVID-19 planning and a 2023 internal summit, suggesting the data spans multiple years and may reflect sustained access rather than a single point-in-time pull.

Bluesky moved to block links pointing to the leaked data and flagged them as malicious, according to WIRED. The speed with which journalists and researchers confirmed active employees in the dataset drew particular concern, given that portions of the records appear to touch on undercover personnel.


A pattern of DHS breaches

This is not the first substantial data exposure tied to DHS. In 2014, a breach potentially affected as many as 390,000 current and former employees, applicants, and contractors. In 2018, the department notified nearly 250,000 people after another incident. Earlier this year, security firm GitGuardian found a publicly accessible GitHub repository containing credentials for privileged AWS GovCloud accounts and internal CISA systems, with the exposure dating back to at least November 2025.

Last month, the hacking group ShinyHunters published a separate spreadsheet containing records on roughly 5,000 alleged FBI employees, including home addresses and emergency contacts, framing that release as retaliation for an FBI advisory about the group.

DHS confirmed it is investigating the current incident. "DHS is aware of a potential breach and is actively working to address the situation swiftly and effectively," as mentioned by a spokesperson, adding that the department would release further details as they became available. DHS did not respond to additional requests for comment by publication time.



Fake ChatGPT and Claude Apps Deliver Crypto-Mining Malware

 

Cybersecurity researchers have uncovered a malware campaign, known as Yoba, that uses fake desktop applications for ChatGPT and Claude to trick users into installing cryptocurrency-mining malware. The attackers created convincing GitHub projects and websites for supposed AI tools such as “GPT-5.6 Sol,” “GPT-6 Astra,” and “Claude Opus,” then distributed malicious ZIP files that appeared to be legitimate installers. According to Check Point Research, the campaign exploits public interest in AI tools and the trust people place in familiar technology brands. 

The malicious archives contain two key files: a genuine, digitally signed executable from OpenAI or Anthropic, and a harmful Windows DLL named winmm.dll. When a user runs the legitimate-looking Setup.exe, Windows loads the malicious DLL alongside it. This technique, called DLL sideloading, lets attackers abuse trusted signed software to make malicious code appear less suspicious and evade basic security checks. Importantly, the research does not suggest that OpenAI, Anthropic, ChatGPT, or Claude themselves were compromised. 

Once launched, the malicious DLL—called YobaDropper—checks that it is being run through the expected host executable, making it harder for researchers to activate it in a sandbox. It then copies a legitimate Windows media component, wmpdmc.exe, into a new folder and places another malicious DLL beside it. This second component, YobaLoader, establishes persistence through a scheduled task and retrieves further instructions from the attacker. 

YobaLoader uses an unusual command-and-control method to avoid detection. It downloads an image from a Telegram channel, takes the final 50 bytes as a seed, and generates a new domain using a domain-generation algorithm. It then queries Google’s DNS-over-HTTPS service for a hidden command stored in a DNS TXT record, which leads it to download the next-stage payload. By using DoH and common file-hosting services, the attackers make their traffic resemble ordinary internet activity and evade passive DNS monitoring. 

The downloaded payload is injected into Windows’ svchost.exe process, where it launches XMRig, a cryptocurrency miner. Victims may notice slower performance, higher CPU usage, increased electricity consumption, or unexpected system heat. Users should download AI applications only from official vendor websites or verified app stores, avoid installing “desktop versions” from random GitHub repositories, and be cautious of search results promoting unfamiliar AI tools. Organizations should also restrict installations from unknown sources and monitor endpoints for unusual scheduled tasks and mining activity.

Moldova Probes Possible Foreign State Involvement in Major Cyberattack Exposing Government Data

 

The Moldovan authorities are looking into whether the large cyber attack, which caused sensitive personal data to be breached and dozens of state services to be disrupted, could be linked to a larger operation targeting citizen data. Prime Minister Vasile Tofan said on Wednesday.

"We have seen coordinated attacks on a large scale. This shouldn’t be seen as an isolated incident. We’re looking at whether there was any foreign state actors involved," he said. The government has not named any countries or hacking groups. 

In total, hackers targeted vulnerabilities between October 19 and October 23 to gain large amounts of personal data from government services. They made around 11 million requests to access data. Preliminary findings show that information relating to around 750,000 identification numbers was removed but this does not necessarily mean all personal data was compromised. 

This could include personal information such as full names, date and place of birth, family relations, health insurance, social benefits, pensions, disabilities, drivers licences, images and car ownership. Financial information such as bank account numbers, tax liabilities and government payments could also have been accessed. However, authorities said there was no breach of bank cards and no evidence of the attackers attempting to tamper with official government documents. 

Initially the hackers exploited vulnerabilities within services that did not require authentication. This was then used to access more records from the government services that are linked. The government have reviewed 82 digital public services and have disconnected the vulnerable services. Over 30 government information systems and administrative services were also disconnected. Several public services were impacted including applying for building permits, veterinary transport authorisations, importing medicine and food safety registrations. 

Most of the services have now been secured, however they are being gradually reconnected following further security checks. On October 23 the authorities said unauthorised access was stopped. However, they said they identified further attempts on Sunday and Tuesday but these were unsuccessful. The government has warned that criminals could attempt to use the stolen information for fraud and impersonation. They could try to impersonate someone from a bank or public institution to get people to give them passwords or codes or send them money. 

The incident could be part of a larger hybrid attack campaign, government spokesperson Dumitru Ciorici said. Moldova has been constantly targeted by cyber attacks and disinformation since Russia launched a full invasion of Ukraine in 2022. 

Moldovan officials have previously accused Russia of launching disinformation campaigns to destabilise the country and weaken state institutions. They have also undermined confidence in the pro-European government led by President Maia Sandu. The latest incident has raised concerns over the security of Moldova’s digital services.

Data Breach at Japan Airlines Adds to Japan's Mounting Cybersecurity Challenges


A data breach has been reported by Japan Airlines (JAL) involving approximately 92,000 customers following unauthorized access to its third-party technology provider, Amadeus IT Group, which exposed passenger reservation information. Due to several recent major cyber incidents reported by Japanese companies, this incident has raised further concerns about the security of customer data handled by external service providers. 

Japanese Airlines and Japan Transocean Air use Amadeus' passenger services systems for flight reservations, ticketing, and check-in operations. According to the airline, Amadeus informed them on October 23, 2026, that unauthorized access to their systems had occurred. This incident involved the breach of customer reservation records stored within the provider's environment. 

Passenger information included names, reservation codes, flight dates, routes, and travel classes of passengers that had been compromised. It is estimated that 90,000 customer information has been exposed. A second 2,000 passengers were also exposed with additional personal information contained in the compromised records, including passports, nationalities, frequent flyer numbers, email addresses, phone numbers, and flight, ticket, and seat numbers. 

According to reports, the unauthorized access occurred from August 10, 2023, to September 23, 2026, suggesting that the affected environment may have been exposed for an extended period of time. Although the method employed by the attackers to gain access has not been publicly disclosed, Japan Airlines has clarified that credit card information and passwords were not compromised in the incident. 

In addition, Amadeus has reportedly implemented security measures to address the issue, as the airline states there is no evidence that the exposed information has been misused and that flight operations have not been disrupted. According to JAL, affected passengers will be contacted individually and provided with necessary assistance. 

Customers were also warned against phishing emails, fraudulent phone calls and suspicious websites impersonating the JAL Group, since exposed travel and contact information might be used in targeted scams. In addition, this incident highlights the risk that third-party technology providers pose in the aviation industry. 

With its digital infrastructure providing airline, airport, hotel, and travel agency customers around the world, Amadeus makes security a critical concern for many organizations. Several airlines have reported possible exposures involving Amadeus systems, extending the impact beyond Japan Airlines. According to Korean Air and Asiana Airlines, unauthorized access to customer information managed by the same technology provider has been reported. 

It is reported that both airlines were notified of the incidents by Amadeus on October 20 and reported them on October 23. Based on their initial findings, it appears that reservation reference numbers belonging to some customers were exposed. Also pointed out was the unauthorized use of credentials related to an Amadeus system account. 

An incident similar to this one has also been reported by All Nippon Airways (ANA), another major Japanese airline. A notification of unauthorized access was received on October 29 by the airline and the provider is currently working to determine the extent of the exposure. As of now, ANA has not released the number of affected passengers or the specific categories of information affected. 

Once additional information has been confirmed, ANA will inform customers. These incidents have raised questions about the security of Amadeus's travel booking infrastructure as a result of their connection. As of October 1, the company disclosed a vulnerability in its travel booking display environment that may be exploited by ransomware actors. 

At that time, Amadeus stated that payment and other financial details had not been exploited by ransomware actors. Following the disclosures by multiple airlines, a closer examination of the earlier security issue has taken place. Amadeus provides technology services to more than 400 airlines, hotels, airport operators, and travel agents. 

In the event of a security vulnerability in a widely utilized platform, information could be exposed to several organizations, although it remains unclear how many airlines and passengers are affected. A person who has access to passenger names, travel schedules, and booking references may use these information to create convincing communications impersonating airlines using the exposed reservation information. This may also lead to opportunities for targeted phishing and identity fraud. 

It may be more credible for such attempts to possess additional information, such as passport numbers, email addresses, and telephone numbers. A broader cyber threat has prompted government intervention in Japan, as Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi called a cabinet meeting on October 26 to discuss the recent attacks and announced plans for emergency measures to strengthen cybersecurity protections for citizens and businesses. Her concern was expressed regarding the potential harm that might result from the misuse of personal information stolen. 

When Shinjiro Koizumi and U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth met in the Philippines on October 28, cyber security concerns of Japan were also discussed. Both sides agreed to intensify cooperation against malicious cyber activities that could adversely affect citizens, economic operations, and national security. 

Amadeus is still investigating these incidents, with the total number of passengers affected, the method by which the unauthorized access occurred, and the possibility of additional airline victims still being determined. It is evident from this incident that third-party technology providers in the aviation sector pose security risks. There remains an urgent need for stronger safeguards and a greater level of oversight in order to protect passengers' information as investigations continue to span multiple airlines.

French Energy Giant ENGIE Hit by Data Breach, Customer Records Accessed Through Partner Platform

 


ENGIE, one of the world's largest energy companies, has notified customers in France that an unauthorized third party accessed their personal data through a marketing platform used by the company's business partners, the company confirmed this week.

The breach notification letters, dated October 23, went to affected customers after ENGIE said it detected "unusual data access activity" on the partner tool. The company has not stated exactly when the intrusion took place or how long the attacker had access before it was caught.

According to the notifications, the data the intruder obtained includes customers' first and last names, mailing addresses, email addresses, and phone numbers. It also includes two types of energy infrastructure identifiers specific to the French grid: the Delivery Point identifier (PDL) and the Metering and Estimation Point identifier (PCE). Both codes are tied to a customer's physical connection to the gas and electricity supply network. Customer IDs and contract numbers were also taken.

ENGIE said no banking data was involved, and that the breach was confined to the partner-facing marketing platform rather than any of its internal systems. The scope of the incident is currently limited to its French customer base, though the company has not said how many customers received notifications.

"We have cut off the attacker's access to the platform, notified the relevant authorities, and are directly informing each affected customer," the company said in a statement.

Customers were advised to stay alert to unsolicited contact and potential phishing attempts in the wake of the exposure.

No ransomware group or extortion actor had publicly claimed responsibility for the breach at the time of publication.


A Company With a Recurring Target on Its Back

ENGIE operates across 30 countries, employs more than 90,000 people, and posted €71.9 billion in revenue last year. Its scale across utilities, renewables, and energy infrastructure makes it a high-value target for threat actors looking for customer data at volume.

This latest breach is not the first time attackers have made it inside ENGIE's wider corporate ecosystem. Approximately a year ago, the Scattered LAPSUS$ Hunters group claimed it had breached a Salesforce instance belonging to Engie Records, the retail energy subsidiary of ENGIE North America, and leaked records from the intrusion. Engie Records appeared on the group's leak site as the 27th of 39 organizations allegedly hit through the same Salesforce-related campaign, with around 3GB of data listed.

Before that, in August 2023, a separate incident affected roughly 110,000 French ENGIE customers. In that case, a hacker known online as "HommedeLombre" reportedly got into ENGIE's systems through an external contractor's network, a technique also used in the Pôle Emploi breach around the same period. That attacker exposed names, email addresses, and phone numbers, and later said the intrusion was meant to demonstrate that "nothing is ever secure," citing rising gas prices as a grievance. ENGIE filed a complaint with authorities following that incident and said it had brought the affected system under control.

If we look closer to understand the link here, the three incidents point to a recurring problem: ENGIE's data, whether held by internal systems, subsidiaries, or third-party partners, keeps ending up in attackers' hands.


Why Energy Sector Customer Data Is Valuable

The combination of contact information and energy-specific identifiers like PDL and PCE codes makes the stolen data more useful to attackers than a standard contact list. Those codes link a name and address to a specific gas or electricity metering point in the French national grid, which means the data could be used to convincingly impersonate ENGIE in phishing campaigns or to target customers with fraudulent offers around energy billing or contracts.

France's energy market also went through a turbulent period of price volatility in recent years, which means many customers have been actively comparing suppliers and receiving legitimate outreach about tariff changes. That context makes it easier for fraudsters to craft believable messages that reference contract numbers, delivery point details, and billing information, exactly the kind of data now in circulation.

ENGIE said it has notified the relevant authorities, as required under GDPR. French data protection rules mandate that breaches of personal data be reported to the CNIL, the national data protection authority, within 72 hours of detection, and that affected individuals be notified without undue delay when the breach poses a risk to their rights and freedoms.

As of now, ENGIE has not attributed the breach to any specific threat actor, and it is unclear whether the platform through which the data was accessed belonged to an external vendor or an internal partner system. The investigation appears to be ongoing.



Cybersecurity Incident Disrupts New Mexico Hospital Network, Forcing Patient Diversions and Clinic Closures

 

A cybersecurity incident caused ambulance diversions, cancelled appointments and disruptions to medical facilities around the state on Monday October 26, leaving New Mexico with no emergency departments able to treat the most severe traumatic injuries. The University of New Mexico Health System provides the only level 1 trauma centre in the state. 

The health system advised patients not to attend the main hospital in Albuquerque and cancelled appointments at over 30 clinics whilst they tried to resolve the issue. Although officials did not immediately say what exactly had happened, later in the day it was announced that parts of the hospital and clinics were beginning to get back up and running. Presbyterian Healthcare Services and Lovelace Health System are also large healthcare providers in the state and worked with the network to prepare to take in extra patients. 

The University of New Mexico Health System sees around 900,000 outpatients and 100,000 emergency department patients per year (University of New Mexico Health System website), meaning this is a large part of the healthcare system. Multiple staff reported seeing messages on their computers late Monday morning stating that student, staff and patient data had been stolen. A spokesperson for the health system did not want to comment as they said there was an ongoing police investigation. 

An FBI spokesperson confirmed that they were assisting a partner organisation but did not give any further details. Attempts to comment were also sent to the Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Office and Albuquerque Police Department. This incident comes as there has been ongoing concerns about attacks on digital systems within essential services such as healthcare. Ransomware requests and other cyber incidents have been seen with hospitals for around a decade, however it is unusual for messages to be shown on computer systems due to the breach (Josephine Wolff, Professor of Cybersecurity Policy at Tufts University). 

This shows how difficult it can be for organisations to protect their networks. The impact could be seen throughout Albuquerque and surrounding areas. At the main hospital, staff in turquoise uniforms were directing patients away from the waiting area and advising they may have their appointments cancelled. Patients arriving at a medical centre in Rio Rancho were also told by security guards to rearrange their appointments. 

The University of New Mexico’s Health Sciences Centre, the largest academic medical centre in the state, cancelled Monday and Tuesday classes. Staff working in the hospital and medical group will be returning on Tuesday. It has not been confirmed what caused the incident, if data has been extracted or if there was a ransom request. The investigation is ongoing.

Warp Breach Exposes AI Agent Logs and Telemetry

 

Warp has disclosed a security incident involving a third party infrastructure vendor that exposed AI agent decision logs and user telemetry. Chief executive Zach Lloyd estimated that approximately 1% of users could be affected, while emphasizing that the investigation remains ongoing. The disclosure identifies an exposure of operational records rather than establishing a compromise of every component in Warp’s development environment. The vendor, initial access mechanism, affected infrastructure components, and precise data boundaries have not been publicly identified, limiting independent assessment of the incident. 

Warp combines terminal functionality, a code editor, task orchestration, and agent activity review within an agentic development environment. Developers use its AI agents to generate code, execute tests, and deploy software. Consequently, agent traces and telemetry represent records associated with automated development workflows, although their exact contents vary with implementation. Warp reports at least 800,000 users, but its preliminary estimate of affected users does not establish the number of exposed records, compromised sessions, or affected organizations. Those measurements describe different dimensions of a security incident.

According to Lloyd, Warp detected what it believed was active, narrowly targeted exploitation of an infrastructure vendor on Friday and intervened within hours. The company described an attacker operation involving an “agent swarm,” sophisticated penetration techniques, and privilege escalation. However, the disclosure does not provide enough technical detail to reconstruct the attack chain or verify individual exploitation stages. No publicly identified vulnerability, authentication bypass, compromised identity, or execution mechanism has been specified. Claims about particular exploit classes would therefore exceed the available evidence. 

The exposed data categories were agent traces and telemetry. Warp has not established publicly whether these records included source code, user prompts, credentials, or other sensitive content. This uncertainty prevents a definitive assessment of confidentiality impact or potential secondary compromise. Exposure of operational logs should not automatically be equated with theft of API keys or unauthorized access to customer repositories. Warp notified identified affected users, informed the vendor, engaged CrowdStrike to assist with investigation, and contacted law enforcement. Further findings are needed to establish scope. 

A separate incident involving AI coding platform OpenCode illustrates why data classification matters when comparing breaches. That compromise exposed stored API keys for external providers, affected approximately 1.4% of users, and resulted in unauthorized charges reaching $1,700 for some victims. Equivalent credential exposure or financial abuse has not been established for Warp. The technical questions remain which records were accessible, what sensitive fields they contained, and how vendor access enabled their exposure. Until those details emerge, conclusions about downstream exploitation must remain provisional.

Brazilian Magecart Group Exploits Plausible Installation to Steal Checkout


Data Magecart, a Brazilian group of hackers, compromised the analytics script used by e-commerce platform Convertr, potentially revealing payment information provided by customers to dozens of Brazilian fashion brands. During the attack, which was detected by cybersecurity firm Sansec on October 24, 2026, malicious code was injected into Convertr's Plausible analytics tracker. 

By modifying a JavaScript file loaded into Convertr's merchant checkouts, the attackers allowed the card skimmer to collect sensitive information during online purchases by modifying the JavaScript file. The data obtained was comprised of card numbers, expiration dates, CVV security codes, cardholder names, and Brazilian CPF taxpayer identification numbers. 

The information was transmitted to a server controlled by the attacker at 1x0.is. Online shopping and checkout services are provided by Convertr to dozens of Brazilian fashion retailers. According to the platform, its merchants have processed more than R$2 billion in sales. Due to the fact that the affected analytics tracker was distributed throughout its merchant network, compromising one file created a potential supply chain risk that extends beyond one individual online store. 

The malicious script was detected by Sansec after a clean version was captured earlier on October 24th. In October, the attackers modified the skimmer in order to target Convertr's payment API field names, making it more effective in capturing payment information. Researchers also reported that the compromised tracker continued to serve on October 26, despite efforts to notify Convertr. 

As Sansec has been tracking the Brazilian Magecart group since July 2024, the incident represents a significant development in its activities. The group has previously targeted individual online stores using Magento, OpenCart and WooCommerce, mainly in Brazil. With the Convertr compromise, Sansec has shifted from infecting individual stores to compromising a service shared by multiple businesses, resulting in the first supply chain attack attributed to the group. 

An unpatched installation of Plausible Community Edition, an open-source web analytics platform, is believed to have been the source of the attack. Versions 3.0.0 through 3.2.0 were affected by CVE-2026-8467, a critical vulnerability that could allow unauthenticated command execution through an exposed component of the /storybook component. 

Convertr reported installing version 3.0 in 2025 and not updating it prior to the incident. On May 15, 2026, Plausible released version 3.2.1 which fixed the vulnerability. Since researchers were not able to access the platform’s server logs, Sansec has not confirmed that the vulnerability was exploited to gain access. Therefore, it remains unclear what specific method was used to compromise the analytics server. Furthermore, the group has consistently targeted Brazilian payment systems as a focus for their methods. 

According to Sansec, its skimmers exhibit recurring characteristics, including the use of short-lived domains as recipients of stolen information, and endpoints containing Portuguese names related to card payments. Other variants have also been developed to attack payment services, including e.Rede, PagSeguro, Pagar.me and Mercado Pago. 

Another version is reported to replace genuine PIX payment QR codes with malicious codes. Convertr confirmed on October 27 that Plausible had been updated with a patched version following the discovery of the malicious script. In addition to notifying affected merchants, payment providers, and relevant authorities, the company also verified that the tracker hosted on Convertr's analytics server was free of infection. 

While it is important to remove malicious code, it does not necessarily eliminate all immediate risks for all shoppers. Sansec stated that browsers may retain cached copies of infected scripts for up to 24 hours following the server-side cleanup, potentially allowing the malicious code to remain active during that period. 

Payments made by Brazilian customers through checkout addresses containing checkout.convertr from October 24 onward should be blocked and replaced by their banks. It is also recommended to monitor transactions for suspicious activity involving CPF identification numbers in order to identify suspicious activity. 

A Sansec recommendation for organizations using Plausible Community Edition is to update the version to 3.2.1 or later and to review server access logs for requests to the exposed path of /storybook. Upon detecting evidence of exploitation, the affected server should be rebuilt, secrets rotated, tracker files checked against the official release, and a more thorough investigation conducted. The incident emphasizes the wider risks associated with shared web infrastructure. 

Multiple businesses can be affected by compromised analytics scripts without the attacker having to breach each merchant individually. To reduce the risk of similar attacks, it is vital that software be updated, scripts loaded on payment pages are monitored, and unauthorized outbound connections are restricted. 

This incident illustrates the dangers posed by compromised third-party scripts used on checkout pages. Preventing digital skimming attacks requires timely software updates, continuous script monitoring, and stronger protection of payment infrastructure.

Genesys Hack Exposes Customer Data From Internal Systems

 

Genesys, a California-based provider of customer experience and call-center technology, has disclosed a cyberattack in which unauthorized actors accessed data from internal business systems. The company said the incident affected a learning management system and a customer relationship management environment, but stressed that its core customer-facing platforms were not compromised. 

According to Genesys, attackers likely downloaded business and account information used to manage relationships with current and prospective customers. The exposed information may include names, phone numbers, business email addresses, job titles, company and account details, and other customer-interaction data. While such records can be valuable for phishing and social-engineering schemes, Genesys has not said how many individuals or organizations were affected. 

The company said it acted quickly to contain the breach, including suspending the LMS platform. By October 23, Genesys announced that the incident had been fully contained, although its investigation into the scope and impact remains ongoing. It has promised further updates as it reviews the accessed information and confirms material facts. 

Importantly, Genesys stated that its Genesys Cloud, Genesys Engage, and Genesys Engage Cloud platforms were not affected. It said there was no unauthorized access to those platforms, customer and partner environments, or the data stored and processed within them. That distinction is significant because the company’s core platforms handle sensitive communications and operational data for enterprise clients. 

Genesys has not identified the attacker, but a newly emerged group called ScarlettGroup has claimed responsibility on its leak site. The company is urging customers to stay alert for suspicious messages impersonating Genesys and emphasized that it will never request sensitive information, such as passwords, through unsolicited email or other channels. The episode is a reminder that even when primary production platforms remain secure, internal systems holding customer-relationship data can still create meaningful privacy and fraud risks.

Chinese National Extradited to Face Charges in $36.9 Million Cryptocurrency Fraud

 


A 44-year-old Chinese national has been brought to the United States from the Netherlands to answer federal charges tied to a cryptocurrency investment scheme that drained nearly $37 million from 174 American victims.

Zhen Zhao was arraigned in California after his extradition, prosecutors said, following a federal indictment handed down in August 2025 charging him with conspiracy to commit money laundering. If convicted, he faces up to 20 years in federal prison.

Zhao is accused of running what investigators call a "pig butchering" operation, a type of confidence scam that has become one of the fastest-growing financial crimes in the world. The name reflects how the fraud works: operators spend weeks or months cultivating trust with their targets before stealing everything from them at once.


How the scheme worked

According to court documents, Zhao and his co-conspirators reached victims through unsolicited text messages, social media platforms, phone calls, and online dating services. The initial contact was typically low-stakes, a misdirected text, a friendly exchange that seemed accidental, or a casual introduction through a dating app. Over time, the operators steered conversations toward investment opportunities, eventually directing victims to what appeared to be functioning cryptocurrency trading platforms.

The platforms were fabricated. Built to resemble real exchanges, they showed account balances growing steadily over time, giving victims every reason to keep putting money in. When victims eventually tried to withdraw their funds, they were blocked, hit with invented fees, or simply cut off. Their money was already gone.

The ring funneled more than $36.9 million from U.S. bank accounts into an account at Deltec Bank in the Bahamas, registered under the name Axis Digital Limited. From there, the bank was directed to convert the deposited money into Tether, a dollar-pegged stablecoin widely used in fraud for its stability and ease of transfer. That Tether was then moved to a digital asset wallet controlled in Cambodia, where it was passed up to the leaders of scam centers operating in the region.

Cambodia has become a significant hub for this type of operation. Criminal syndicates there have turned large-scale cryptocurrency fraud into core business, often staffing compound facilities with trafficked workers from across Asia who are forced to run these schemes under threat of violence. The money chain in the Zhao case reflects that geography directly.


Eight accomplices, two already sentenced

Zhao was not running the operation alone. Eight co-conspirators have already pleaded guilty in connection with the same scheme. Two have been sentenced so far, one to 51 months and another to 46 months in federal prison. The remaining cases are moving through the courts.

The extradition itself was the result of months of legal coordination between U.S. prosecutors, the State Department, and Dutch authorities. The Netherlands, which maintains a functioning extradition treaty with the United States, processed Zhao's transfer back to face trial in California.


A problem that keeps growing

This case sits inside a much larger crisis. The FBI's 2025 Internet Crime Report recorded more than $8.6 billion in losses from investment scams over the course of a single year, up from $6.5 billion the year before. Those figures came from roughly 73,000 complaints, and investigators routinely note that reported numbers reflect only a portion of real losses, since many victims never file a report out of embarrassment or because they do not know where to turn.

Pig butchering has become the dominant form of cryptocurrency fraud in the United States. The FBI ran a proactive victim notification program that reached more than 4,300 pig butchering victims in a single year, warning people before they lost everything. Despite those efforts, the dollar figures keep climbing.

The Department of Justice has treated these cases as a priority. In December 2023, federal prosecutors in California charged four people with laundering more than $80 million connected to similar cryptocurrency investment scams, using shell companies and hundreds of individual banking transactions to move stolen money internationally. Prosecutors at the time described the mechanics as nearly identical to what Zhao and his network allegedly ran.


What victims should do

Anyone who believes they were targeted by a pig butchering scam can file a report with the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center at IC3.gov. Investigators ask that victims preserve all records of communications, platform names, cryptocurrency wallet addresses, transaction IDs, and any banking information they shared during the fraud.

For Zhao, the arraignment in California is the start of what will likely be a long legal process. With eight alleged co-conspirators already pleading guilty, prosecutors appear to have a functioning case built around his network. Whether he opts for trial or takes a similar path remains to be determined.




DreamHost Forces Password Resets Amid Ongoing Security Incident


Due to a disruption of access to DreamHost's File Manager and webmail services as a result of an incident, certain email and FTP/SFTP accounts were forced to reset their passwords. Although the hosting provider described the action as a precautionary security measure, it has not yet revealed the cause of the incident or confirmed whether any accounts have been accessed without authorization. 

When DreamHost first detected connectivity problems affecting its file manager on the web at files.dreamhost.com on October 23, 2026, the disruption was initially reported. As a consequence, some webmail users experienced login failures, while FTP/SFTP access was also affected by the issue. As a result, the company reset passwords for affected accounts and temporarily restricted access until new credentials could be established. 

When a DreamHost account owner assigns a replacement password to the affected mailbox and file transfer users, the users cannot sign in. By the weekend, DreamHost mailed recovery instructions to all affected account holders in stages and confirmed to all affected account holders that all were notified by October 25. 

In October, the company reported that engineers had deployed a fix and had restored File Manager functionality. Monitoring continued to ensure that the service continued to operate, however password changes for affected accounts continued to be required. Since limited information has been released by the company about the incident, customers have expressed concern. 

Neither DreamHost nor the company has identified the root cause, disclosed the number of accounts affected, or confirmed whether any email messages, stored files, or login credentials have been compromised. Also, the provider advised users to review their mailbox forwarding settings and remove any unfamiliar destinations. This setting can be abused in order to redirect sensitive communications outside a company, thereby making it a crucial element of account security. 

DreamHost has, however, not confirmed that unauthorized forwarding rules have been created in this incident. Additionally, customers have expressed concern about the lack of detailed explanations for the disruptions in service as well as mandatory password changes. Despite speculation about a possible compromise, no publicly available confirmation has been provided to indicate that an attack or data breach has occurred. 

According to DreamHost, account owners should update stored credentials across connected applications and review account settings in order to complete the recovery process. Email clients, FTP/SFTP software, website backup tools, deployment systems and plugins relying on previously stored credentials may be affected by password changes. 

In order to avoid the possibility of affected users losing access to their hosted mailboxes, the company recommends that replacement passwords be shared through private channels, such as telephone calls or secure text messages. The recovery guidance provided by DreamHost specifies that mailbox passwords can be changed under “Mail > Manage Email” in the control panel, and FTP/SFTP credentials can be updated under “Websites > SFTP Users & Files”. 

If you changed your password before the reset process was completed, you should verify that your new password remains valid as well. Password changes may take up to 15 minutes to become effective. There is no indication that incoming email is reaching affected mailboxes, and that FTP/SFTP data is still stored on the provider's servers. 

In addition to these assurances concerning service and data availability, it is also recommended that website owners conduct routine site checks to determine whether unauthorized access occurred prior to the password reset. Considering that FTP/SFTP credentials provide access to website files, it is important to identify suspicious changes by reviewing recently modified files, unfamiliar administrator accounts, and unforeseen scheduled tasks.

There has been no evidence published to indicate that DreamHost-hosted websites were altered as a result of the incident. This episode also underscores the importance of using third-party hosting providers for security reasons. When a hosting company encounters a disruption, several connected services may be affected at once, especially when email addresses and file transfer credentials are handled by the same provider.

In order to ensure that essential operations are resumed after the password change, DreamHost has repeatedly warned customers that it will never send customers passwords by email. Businesses using DreamHost may need to check integrations and automated processes reliant on these accounts. Rather than logging into the control panel through unsolicited messages, account owners should access the control panel directly. 

No public explanation has yet been provided by the company as to what triggered the incident or the number of affected customers has been confirmed. In the interim, a central question remains as to whether the incident involved unauthorized access, how many accounts were affected, and if any customer information was revealed. Despite DreamHost's password reset process and restoration of File Manager access, the broader issues associated with the incident haven't been resolved. 

DreamHost's restoration of File Manager access marks progress in the recovery process, but the absence of an identified root cause leaves the incident's broader security implications unresolved. While the company has yet to clarify the cause of the incident, and whether any customer accounts or data has been accessed, it remains unclear how the incident will impact the security of the company.

Researchers Uncover Compaction Smuggling Flaw That Exposes OpenAI Reasoning Traces

 


Researchers at Xint identified a vulnerability in the OpenAI API that could expose hidden reasoning traces from advanced AI models, creating a potential route for large-scale model distillation. The technique, named “compaction smuggling,” bypassed safeguards introduced after earlier research demonstrated methods for extracting encrypted reasoning data. OpenAI confirmed the issue and deployed a fix on October 23, 2026. Xint received a $6,000 bounty for the discovery. 

Reasoning models such as GPT-5.6 Sol generate intermediate reasoning before producing answers. OpenAI does not provide API users with the complete raw reasoning in readable form, instead offering optional summaries. This restriction helps protect against distillation, a process in which developers train smaller models using outputs from more advanced systems. Full reasoning traces can provide particularly useful training data because they contain intermediate steps, incorrect approaches and self-corrections. 

The API stores raw reasoning in encrypted items that clients can return during later interactions but cannot directly decode. OpenAI also encrypts conversation compactions, which condense lengthy exchanges into smaller items while preserving relevant context. The discovery follows an August 2026 study titled Stealing Reasoning Traces from Proprietary LLM APIs. The researchers behind that study demonstrated that encrypted reasoning could be replayed into weaker models from the same provider and reproduced as text. 

The approach affected models from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google, although OpenAI’s safeguards made extraction more difficult. Subsequent protections reportedly stopped the original technique from working. Xint discovered that the compaction feature offered another route. The researchers first generated reasoning using GPT-5.6 Sol and retained its encrypted reasoning item. They then removed the original task from the conversation history and instructed the compaction process to preserve the reasoning verbatim in a JSON object. Replacing spaces with tab characters helped the content evade usage-policy classifiers. 

The resulting encrypted compaction was then submitted to GPT-4.1 and GPT-4o, which were instructed to reproduce the contents exactly. After decoding the JSON and converting tabs back into spaces, the researchers recovered the reasoning trace. The technique worked across all tested reasoning-effort settings, from minimal to maximum. In the demonstration, the original reasoning item contained 405 tokens, compared with 612 tokens in the compaction and 609 tokens in each echoed output. Xint compared outputs from two models using different prompts and obtained identical results. 

Although the original plaintext was unavailable for a definitive token-by-token comparison, the recovered trace retained its false starts, corrections and characteristic writing style. The researchers developed the technique while investigating GhostCompact and examining how encrypted compactions could be transferred between models. The findings raise concerns about large-scale extraction of proprietary AI capabilities. 

In September 2026, U.S. agencies warned about industrial-scale model distillation campaigns. Anthropic subsequently reported seven campaigns attributed to China-based laboratories, while OpenAI disclosed disrupting an effort that generated approximately 16,000 requests from more than 4,000 accounts in July. 

Xint concluded that server-side processes handling decrypted reasoning while accepting client-controlled instructions can become potential extraction pathways. The researchers said compaction features require protections comparable to those applied to raw reasoning traces.

Dutch Police Arrest Two Over $400,000 NFC Relay Bank Fraud

 

Dutch police have arrested two men suspected of operating a sophisticated bank-fraud scheme that used NFC relay attacks to steal more than €380,000, approximately $425,600, from 170 victims. The suspects allegedly combined AI-generated robocalls, fake bank employees, and malicious mobile applications to trick people into exposing their contactless debit-card data. The arrests highlight how criminals are adapting near-field communication technology, which is designed for convenient tap-to-pay transactions, into a tool for remote account theft. 

According to Dutch authorities, the scam began with automated calls that used AI-generated audio to impersonate banks, companies, or other trusted organizations. Victims were told that suspicious activity had been detected on their accounts and were asked to press “1” if they were not responsible. Once the victim responded, the call was transferred to a suspect posing as a bank employee, who claimed that the person’s debit card had been blocked and needed verification. 

The fraudsters then instructed victims to download an application and hold their debit card against their phone. Rather than simply verifying the card, the app extracted data from the card’s NFC chip, which supports contactless payments. That information was relayed in real time to an accomplice waiting at an ATM, who used it to withdraw money from the victim’s bank account. This technique is known as an NFC relay attack because it effectively extends the card’s contactless signal across a distance. 

Police arrested a 23-year-old man from Vaassen and a 25-year-old man from Ede on October 6. Investigators believe the younger suspect likely built the technical infrastructure behind the operation and orchestrated the attacks, while the second suspect played a coordinating role. Authorities also took the criminals’ servers offline and seized them, along with phones and laptops believed to be connected to the scheme. Both men remain in custody while the investigation continues. 

The case is a warning that a phone call claiming to be from a bank should never be treated as proof of identity. Genuine banks generally do not ask customers to install unknown apps, scan their cards against a phone, or share one-time codes. Consumers can reduce their risk by hanging up and calling their bank using the number on the official website or card, avoiding app downloads from unsolicited calls, and treating any request to tap a payment card on a phone as a major red flag.

AI Coding Agents Can Be Hijacked by a Single Malicious File in Your Downloads Folder

 



A security firm has found that placing a disguised instruction file inside a user's Downloads folder is enough to manipulate AI coding agents into installing malware, with one leading tool executing a known-malicious package in more than nine out of ten test runs.

The finding comes from Forever Security, which said one of its customers had an `AGENTS.md` file sitting in their Downloads folder. The file was designed to look like routine engineering notes, but its actual purpose was to instruct any coding agent that opened the folder to install `function-color`, a package tied to the MALFEX npm supply chain campaign. Forever stopped the agent before the installation completed. The firm could not determine how the file got there.


How the Malware Chain Works

`function-color` is a wrapper package. It carries no payload of its own but silently installs `function-flag` as a dependency. That package runs a postinstall script that downloads a Windows executable from a remote host, saves it as `node.exe` inside `%APPDATA%`, and executes it in the background. The download routine sits inside an empty catch block, so a failed attempt produces no error and leaves no trace in the install log. As of early October, both packages remained installable on npm with no advisory flagging either one.

The reason the attack targets the Downloads folder specifically is not arbitrary. Browsers can save files to that directory without asking the user for permission or even requiring a click. Forever built a proof-of-concept web page that silently dropped a crafted `AGENTS.md` into Downloads during a normal browsing session. The firm did not establish that an attacker used this exact method against its customer, but the capability is real and requires no special access.


Test Results Across Two Major Agents

To measure how reliably the technique works, Forever ran controlled tests against OpenAI's Codex and Anthropic's Claude Code.

For Codex, the planted file instructed the agent to register a new server entry in `~/.codex/config.toml` and install the malicious package. Because that config file applies to every session on the machine, a successful write would persist across projects. Codex followed through in more than 90 percent of the test attempts inside an isolated virtual machine.

Claude Code required a different approach. The planted `CLAUDE.md` was written to resemble internal gateway setup documentation, and its goal was to write a custom API endpoint into the project's `.claude/settings.json` file. If an attacker controls that endpoint, every API call from the agent passes through their infrastructure, along with the session token. The token can then be used to take over the account. Claude Code normally prompts the user to approve writes of that kind, and it frequently rejected requests that looked suspicious. The extended engineering-document framing, however, got the write approved roughly half the time.


Neither Vendor Has a Patch

Forever stated plainly that there is nothing for OpenAI or Anthropic to fix. Each agent was doing what it was built to do: read instruction files in the working directory and carry out the steps listed in them. The firm compared the situation to a browser rendering a phishing page. The browser is not broken; the page is malicious.

That framing shifts the responsibility to users and organizations. Forever's own telemetry adds urgency to that point. About half of its customers run a coding agent from their Downloads folder, and roughly a quarter of agent sessions involve an open browser. In many of those cases, no person is actively watching the session when a new file arrives in the directory.


What to Do

The most direct fix is to stop running coding agents from the Downloads folder entirely. Beyond that, Forever recommends reading any `AGENTS.md` or `CLAUDE.md` file you did not write yourself before running a session, including files that arrive in freshly cloned repositories.

For anyone who suspects a file may have already been processed, the firm advises checking `~/.codex/config.toml` for unrecognized server blocks and reviewing `.claude/settings.json` for API endpoints that were not intentionally set. On Windows machines, the presence of `node.exe` inside `%APPDATA%` is a strong indicator that the function-flag payload ran successfully. If a planted file is confirmed, the session's login token should be treated as compromised and rotated immediately.

Keeping approval prompts enabled and running agents inside sandboxes reduces the attack surface, though the Claude Code test results show that approval prompts alone are not a reliable barrier when the malicious instruction is written to look like legitimate documentation.