Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

About Me

Showing posts with label Threat Landscape. Show all posts

AI Bots Fuel 57% of Holiday Shopping Traffic, Study Finds

 

Radware's 2025 E-commerce Bot Threat Report reveals that automated bots generated 57% of online shopping website traffic during the 2024 holiday season, rather than human buyers. According to Radware's analytics, this is the first time non-DDoS generating bots have outperformed human shoppers in driving traffic to e-commerce websites. The company claims that this represents substantial shifts in the cybersecurity landscape for e-commerce providers and online retailers.

"Bad bots are no longer just based on simple scripts—they're sophisticated, AI-enhanced agents capable of outsmarting traditional defences. E-commerce providers and online retailers that rely on conventional security measures will find themselves increasingly exposed, not just during the holidays but year-round," stated Ron Meyran, Vice President of Cyber Threat Intelligence at Radware. 

The report describes numerous important bot attack trends and real-world data collected during the 2024 online holiday shopping season. It also looks at the dispersed and multi-vector threats that e-commerce enterprises should be prepared to face in the coming year. According to the findings, AI-generated bots with human-like characteristics are becoming more common. Bad bots accounted for 31% of all internet traffic during the 2024 holiday season. 

Nearly 60% of this malicious traffic employed novel strategies to avoid traditional, signature-based detection systems. Tactics discovered include IP address and identity rotation, distributed attack patterns, the exploitation of CAPTCHA farm services, and other sophisticated anomalies. According to the study, addressing these risks requires reliable, AI-powered detection systems that prevent false positives while recognising attack trends. 

The report also highlights that attacks against mobile platforms have increased. The holiday seasons of 2023 and 2024 saw a 160% spike in malicious bot traffic directed at mobile devices. According to the study, this change in attacker focus necessitates security measures that are especially suited for mobile systems. These days, attackers use headless browsers with mobile user-agent strings, mobile emulators, and mobile-centric proxy services. 

Attacks against distributed network infrastructures and residential proxy networks have also increased. Between 2023 and 2024, the share of holiday assault traffic originating and blending with ISP networks climbed by 32%. This rise reflects attackers' increased use of residential proxy services to circumvent rate-limiting, geo-based, and IP-based blocking methods. According to Radware, this trend creates new mitigation challenges for security teams who lack comprehensive and multilayered defences.

Iran Claims it Thwarted Sophisticated Cyberattack on its Infrastructure

 

Iran thwarted a “widespread and complex” cyberattack on Sunday that targeted the nation’s infrastructure, a senior official told Tasnim News Agency, which is affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. 

Behzad Akbari, the head of the government's Telecommunications Infrastructure Company (TIC), revealed the occurrence, which was not explained in detail. "One of the most widespread and complex cyber attacks against the country's infrastructure was identified and preventive measures were taken," Akbari noted. 

The cyber incident occurred a day after a huge explosion at Shahid Rajaei, the country's busiest commercial port, which killed at least 28 people and injured 800 more, according to police. The cause has not been determined. There is no indication that it was related to any cyber activity. 

Ambrey Intelligence, a maritime risk consultant, claims the explosion was caused by "improper handling of a shipment of solid fuel intended for use in Iranian ballistic missiles" imported from China, while Iran's defence ministry denies this. 

It comes amid ongoing talks between Iran and the United States over the Islamic Republic's contentious nuclear program, amid concerns that the nation will aim to enrich uranium to the point where it could build a nuclear bomb. Iran has had many noteworthy cyberattacks in recent years, including those against the country's fuel system in 2021 and a steel mill in June 2022, both claimed by a group calling itself Predatory Sparrow, which stated that its attacks were "carried out carefully to protect innocent individuals.” 

While the Predatory Sparrow group claims to be made up of dissidents, the attack on the steel mill appeared to be carried out with sophisticated operational planning to avoid casualties, raising the possibility that it was sponsored by a foreign state agency with a risk management process. Iranian officials blamed the United States and Israel for the 2021 cyberattack on Iran's gasoline systems, but provided no evidence. 

At the time, Gholamreza Jalali, the country's civil defence chief, told state television: "We are still unable to say forensically, but analytically, I believe it was carried out by the Zionist Regime, the Americans, and their agents.” 

Jalili claimed that the United States and Israel were responsible for a cyberattack on the Shahid Rajaei port authority's technological infrastructure in 2020, but he did not provide any evidence. The United States and Israel are thought to have worked on the Stuxnet worm, which was discovered in 2010 and was aimed to destroy Iran's nuclear program.

Digital Danger Zone: America's Rising Cybersecurity Threats

 

A major firm being hacked, facing a cyber threat, or having critical digital data leaked seems to make headlines every day. Cyberattacks increased dramatically worldwide in the first quarter of 2025, with an average of 1,925 attacks per organisation per week. Compared to the same period in 2024, that is an astounding 47% increase. 

The personal information of hundreds of thousands of Americans has been made public by high-profile hacks at organisations like Ticketmaster, AT&T, and UnitedHealth. These kinds of attacks have turned cybersecurity from a technical issue to a national security and economic one. 

New cybercrime front lines 

With cyberattacks expected to skyrocket in 2025, many Americans are investigating what's driving this digital crime wave. One significant factor is our increasing reliance on the internet. As more people and organisations share personal and financial information online, fraudsters' targets have grown in size and profitability. 

The transition to remote employment has also provided new opportunities for attackers. Employees working from home, coffee shops, or communal spaces frequently use unprotected networks and personal devices that lack the security of a corporate IT system. 

Adding to the difficulty, fraudsters are increasingly using artificial intelligence to make their attacks faster, smarter, and more challenging to detect. AI-powered tools enable hackers to automate phishing emails, impersonate reputable websites, and even crack passwords at breakneck speed. As a result, traditional cybersecurity defences are unable to keep pace.

Infrastructure flaws

Cyberattacks are endangering not only private businesses, but also the systems that keep the government functioning. The US Department of Homeland Security has identified sixteen critical infrastructure sectors as crucial to national security, public health, and economic stability. These include energy, healthcare, water systems, financial services, and transportation, among others. 

A successful cyberattack on any of them might result in widespread disruptions, ranging from power outages to delayed emergency services. Ransomware assaults have recently targeted hospitals, oil pipelines, and even public transportation systems, indicating that these sectors are becoming increasingly vulnerable to both cybercriminals and state actors. 

One of the most high-profile incidents occurred in 2021, when a ransomware group targeted the Colonial Pipeline. The attack forced a temporary stoppage of the pipeline, resulting in fuel shortages and price increases across the Southeastern United States. Colonial later paid the hackers $4.4 million in cryptocurrencies to restore its servers. That attack, and others like it, have raised fears that essential utilities and infrastructure are still vulnerable to foreign intrusion. As cyberthreats advance, many experts fear that future attacks may have far larger and more severe consequences.

Remain cautious 

With AI making hacks easier than ever, it is critical to keep ahead of the curve. New legislation, such as updated data privacy laws and tougher cybersecurity regulations, can help safeguard both businesses and citizens from these emerging threats. Beyond legislation, public awareness is crucial. 

Americans should be aware of the most prevalent cybercrime strategies, such as phishing emails, deep fakes, and social engineering frauds. As AI-generated material gets more convincing, fraudulent actors have an easier time impersonating trusted sources or manipulating digital identities. 

Cybersecurity experts emphasise the importance of integrating digital literacy into ordinary education. Small efforts, such as multi-factor authentication and safe browsing practices, can help to reduce risk significantly. Staying vigilant in the age of AI-enhanced cybercrime is not just sensible, but also critical.

Explaining AI's Impact on Ransomware Attacks and Businesses Security

 

Ransomware has always been an evolving menace, as criminal outfits experiment with new techniques to terrorise their victims and gain maximum leverage while making extortion demands. Weaponized AI is the most recent addition to the armoury, allowing high-level groups to launch more sophisticated attacks but also opening the door for rookie hackers. The NCSC has cautioned that AI is fuelling the global threat posed by ransomware, and there has been a significant rise in AI-powered phishing attacks. 

Organisations are increasingly facing increasing threats from sophisticated assaults, such as polymorphic malware, which can mutate in real time to avoid detection, allowing organisations to strike with more precision and frequency. As AI continues to rewrite the rules of ransomware attacks, businesses that still rely on traditional defences are more vulnerable to the next generation of cyber attack. 

Ransomware accessible via AI 

Online criminals, like legal businesses, are discovering new methods to use AI tools, which makes ransomware attacks more accessible and scalable. By automating crucial attack procedures, fraudsters may launch faster, more sophisticated operations with less human intervention. 

Established and experienced criminal gangs gain from the ability to expand their operations. At the same time, because AI is lowering entrance barriers, folks with less technical expertise can now utilise ransomware as a service (RaaS) to undertake advanced attacks that would ordinarily be outside their pay grade. 

OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, stated that it has detected and blocked more than 20 fraudulent operations with its famous generative AI tool. This ranged from creating copy for targeted phishing operations to physically coding and debugging malware. 

FunkSec, a RaaS supplier, is a current example of how these tools are enhancing criminal groups' capabilities. The gang is reported to have only a few members, and its human-created code is rather simple, with a very low level of English. However, since its inception in late 2024, FunkSec has recorded over 80 victims in a single month, thanks to a variety of AI techniques that allow them to punch much beyond their weight. 

Investigations have revealed evidence of AI-generated code in the gang's ransomware, as well as web and ransom text that was obviously created by a Large Language Model (LLM). The team also developed a chatbot to assist with their operations using Miniapps, a generative AI platform. 

Mitigation tips against AI-driven ransomware 

With AI fuelling ransomware groups, organisations must evolve their defences to stay safe. Traditional security measures are no longer sufficient, and organisations must match their fast-moving attackers with their own adaptive, AI-driven methods to stay competitive. 

One critical step is to investigate how to combat AI with AI. Advanced AI-driven detection and response systems may analyse behavioural patterns in real time, identifying anomalies that traditional signature-based techniques may overlook. This is critical for fighting strategies like polymorphism, which have been expressly designed to circumvent standard detection technologies. Continuous network monitoring provides an additional layer of defence, detecting suspicious activity before ransomware can activate and propagate. 

Beyond detection, AI-powered solutions are critical for avoiding data exfiltration, as modern ransomware gangs almost always use data theft to squeeze their victims. According to our research, 94% of reported ransomware attacks in 2024 involved exfiltration, highlighting the importance of Anti Data Exfiltration (ADX) solutions as part of a layered security approach. Organisations can prevent extortion efforts by restricting unauthorised data transfers, leaving attackers with no choice but to move on.

US Tariffs May Lead to Chinese Cyberattacks in Retaliation, Experts Warn

 

As the trade battle between the United States and China heats up, some cybersecurity and policy experts fear Beijing could retaliate in cyberspace. Shortly after the US raised its tax on imported Chinese goods to 104 percent on Wednesday last week, China raised its duty on American imports to 84 percent.

"China urges the US to immediately correct its wrong practices, cancel all unilateral tariff measures against China, and properly resolve differences with China through equal dialogue on the basis of mutual respect," the Office of the Tariff Commission of the State Council noted in a statement. 

Citing a "lack of respect" from Beijing, US President Trump raised the China tariff yet again, this time by 125 percent. The government later "paused" punitive tariffs on numerous other countries, but maintained the 125 percent tax on China. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters, "President Trump will strike back harder when you strike at the United States of America.” 

There is growing concern that President Xi Jinping may use his army of cyber-spies to support the People's Republic, even though this back and forth has the potential to ruin trade between the two countries, drive up consumer costs, or cut off supply completely. 

"China will retaliate with systemic cyber attacks as tensions simmer over," cybersecurity advisor Tom Kellermann stated. "The typhoon campaigns have given them a robust foothold within critical infrastructure that will be used to launch destructive attacks. Trade wars were a historical instrument of soft power. Cyber is and will be the modern instrument of choice.” 

The "typhoon campaigns" refer to a sequence of digital incursions supported by the Chinese government that were revealed last year. Among them are Volt Typhoon, which has been infiltrating America's vital infrastructure since at least 2023 and plotting destructive cyberattacks against those targets, and Salt Typhoon, an espionage team that gained access to at least nine US government and telecom networks. 

"To the extent that China is holding back on conducting certain types of cyberattacks, it may feel less restrained now," noted Annie Fixler, director of the Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

"The intelligence community has assessed that China has conducted operational preparation of the battlefield to disrupt US critical infrastructure and cause societal panic, impede US government decision making, and degrade our ability to mobilize forces," Fixler added. 

In addition to spying, which is always going on, it is unclear what, if anything, Beijing-backed goons intend to do online to protest Trump's tariffs. However, financially motivated cybercriminals have already discovered ways to take advantage of people's misunderstanding of the constantly changing trade regulations.

The Rise of Cyber Warfare and Its Global Implications

 

In Western society, the likelihood of cyberattacks is arguably higher now than it has ever been. The National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) advised UK organisations to strengthen their cyber security when Russia launched its attack on Ukraine in early 2022. In a similar vein, the FBI and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued warnings about increased risks to US companies. 

There is no doubt that during times of global transition and turmoil, cyber security becomes a battlefield in its own right, with both state and non-state actors increasingly turning to cyber-attacks to gain an advantage in combat. Furthermore, as technology advances and an increasing number of devices connect to the internet, the scope and sophistication of cyber-attacks has grown significantly. 

Cyber warfare can take numerous forms, such as breaking into enemy state computer systems, spreading malware, and executing denial-of-service assaults. If a cyber threat infiltrates the right systems, entire towns and cities may be shut off from information, services, and infrastructure that have become fundamental to our way of life, such as electricity, online banking systems, and the internet. 

The European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) believes that cyber warfare poses a substantial and growing threat to vital infrastructure. Its research on the "Threat Landscape for Foreign Information Manipulation Interference (FIMI)" states that key infrastructure, such as electricity and healthcare, is especially vulnerable to cyber-attacks during times of conflict or political tension.

In addition, cyber-attacks can disrupt banking systems, inflicting immediate economic loss and affecting individuals. According to the report, residents were a secondary target in more than half of the incidents analysed. Cyber-attacks are especially effective at manipulating public perceptions through, at the most basic level, inconvenience, to the most serious level, which could result in the loss of life. 

Risk to businesses 

War and military conflicts can foster a business environment susceptible to cyber-attacks, since enemies may seek to target firms or sectors deemed critical to a country's economy or infrastructure. They may also choose symbolic targets, like media outlets or high-profile businesses connected with a country. 

Furthermore, the use of cyber-attacks in war can produce a broad sense of instability and uncertainty, which can be exploited to exploit vulnerabilities in firms' cyber defences.

Cyber-attacks on a company's computer systems, networks, and servers can cause delays and shutdowns, resulting in direct loss of productivity and money. However, they can also harm reputation, prompt regulatory action (including the imposition of fines), and result in consumer loss. 

Prevention tips

To mitigate these risks, firms can take proactive actions to increase their cyber defences, such as self-critical auditing and third-party testing. Employees should also be trained to identify and respond to cyber risks. Furthermore, firms should conduct frequent security assessments to detect vulnerabilities and adopt mitigation techniques.

Russians Seize Malware-Infected Ukrainian Drones

 

Ukrainian forces are installing malware into their drones as a new tactic in their ongoing war with Russia. This development adds a cyber warfare layer to a battlefield that has already been impacted by drone technology, Forbes reported. 

Russian forces identified Ukrainian drones carrying malware, as evidenced by a video uploaded on social media. According to a Reddit thread that includes the video, this malware performs a variety of disruptive functions, including "burning out the USB port, preventing reflashing, or hijacking the repurposed FPV and revealing the operator location.” 

“This tactic highlights how Ukraine is leveraging its strong pre-war information technology sector to counter Russia’s advanced military technologies and strong defense industrial base,” states defense expert Vikram Mittal in his analysis. 

The malware serves several strategic objectives. It hinders Russian troops from analyzing seized Ukrainian drones to create countermeasures, prohibits them from repurposing captured technology, and may allow Ukrainian forces to track the whereabouts of Russian drone operators attempting to use captured devices.

“By embedding malware into their drones, Ukrainian developers have found a way to disrupt Russian counter-drone efforts without requiring additional physical resources, a critical advantage given Ukraine’s logistical constraints. This innovation could have broader implications for the war. If successful, Ukraine may begin integrating malware into other electronic systems to limit Russia’s ability to study or reuse them,” Mittal explains.

As drone warfare tactics continue to evolve, the report suggests that this trend would likely lead to a new technological competition between Russia and Ukraine. Ukraine's use of malware is expected to spark a new technological competition, similar to what is already happening with Ukrainian and Russian drone technology. 

In response, Russia is likely to deploy similar spyware on its drones and equipment, while both sides respond by establishing safety protocols and developing anti-virus software to combat the malware. In response, scientists on both sides will create increasingly powerful malware to circumvent these protections. This continuous cycle of assault and defence will add a new dimension to the fight for drone supremacy.

Windows Shortcut Vulnerability Exploited by 11 State-Sponsored Outfits

 

Since 2017, at least 11 state-sponsored threat groups have actively exploited a Microsoft zero-day issue that allows for abuse of Windows shortcut files to steal data and commit cyber espionage against organisations across multiple industries. 

Threat analysts from Trend Micro's Trend Zero Day Initiative (ZDI) discovered roughly 1,000 malicious.lnk files that exploited the flaw, known as ZDI-CAN-25373, which allowed cyber criminals to execute concealed malicious commands on a victim's PC via customised shortcut files.

“By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can prepare a malicious .lnk file for delivery to a victim,” researchers at Trend Micro noted. “Upon examining the file using the Windows-provided user interface, the victim will not be able to tell that the file contains any malicious content.”

The malicious files delivered by cybercriminals include a variety of payloads, including the Lumma infostealer and the Remcos remote access Trojan (RAT), which expose organisations to data theft and cyber espionage. 

State-sponsored outfits from North Korea, Iran, Russia, and China, as well as non-state actors, are among those behind the flaw attacks, which have affected organisations in the government, financial, telecommunications, military, and energy sectors across North America, Europe, Asia, South America, and Australia. 

Additionally, 45% of attacks were carried out by North Korean players, with Iran, Russia, and China each accounting for approximately 18%. Some of the groups listed as attackers are Evil Corp, Kimsuky, Bitter, and Mustang Panda, among others.

According to Trend Micro, Microsoft has not fixed the flaw despite receiving a proof-of-concept exploit through Trend ZDI's bug bounty program. Trend Micro did not react to a follow-up request for comment on their flaw detection and submission timeline.

Microsoft's position remains that it will not be fixing the vulnerability described by Trend Micro at this time because it "does not meet the bar for immediate servicing under our severity classification guidelines," though the company "will consider addressing it in a future feature release," according to an email from a Microsoft spokesperson.

Meanwhile, Microsoft Defender can detect and block threat behaviour, as detailed by Trend Micro, and Microsoft's Windows Smart App Control prevents malicious files from being downloaded from the internet. Furthermore, Windows recognises shortcut (.lnk) files as potentially malicious file types, and the system will automatically display a warning if a user attempts to download one.

Nearly Half of Companies Lack AI-driven Cyber Threat Plans, Report Finds

 

Mimecast has discovered that over 55% of organisations do not have specific plans in place to deal with AI-driven cyberthreats. The cybersecurity company's most recent "State of Human Risk" report, which is based on a global survey of 1,100 IT security professionals, emphasises growing concerns about insider threats, cybersecurity budget shortages, and vulnerabilities related to artificial intelligence. 

According to the report, establishing a structured cybersecurity strategy has improved the risk posture of 96% of organisations. The threat landscape is still becoming more complicated, though, and insider threats and AI-driven attacks are posing new challenges for security leaders. 

“Despite the complexity of challenges facing organisations—including increased insider risk, larger attack surfaces from collaboration tools, and sophisticated AI attacks—organisations are still too eager to simply throw point solutions at the problem,” stated Mimecast’s human risk strategist VP, Masha Sedova. “With short-staffed IT and security teams and an unrelenting threat landscape, organisations must shift to a human-centric platform approach that connects the dots between employees and technology to keep the business secure.” 

95% of organisations use AI for insider risk assessments, endpoint security, and threat detection, according to the survey, but 81% are concerned regarding data leakage from generative AI (GenAI) technology. In addition to 46% not being confident in their abilities to defend against AI-powered phishing and deepfake threats, more than half do not have defined tactics to resist AI-driven attacks.

Data loss from internal sources is expected to increase over the next year, according to 66% of IT leaders, while insider security incidents have increased by 43%. The average cost of insider-driven data breaches, leaks, or theft is $13.9 million per incident, according to the research. Furthermore, 79% of organisations think that the increased usage of collaboration technologies has increased security concerns, making them more vulnerable to both deliberate and accidental data breaches. 

With only 8% of employees accountable for 80% of security incidents, the report highlights a move away from traditional security awareness training and towards proactive Human Risk Management. To identify and eliminate threats early, organisations are implementing behavioural analytics and AI-driven surveillance. A shift towards sophisticated threat detection and risk mitigation techniques is seen in the fact that 72% of security leaders believe that human-centric cybersecurity solutions will be essential over the next five years.

Threat Analysts Warn of the 'Largest Data Breach' After Elon Musk's DOGE Controversy

 

The debate over Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency continues, with the world's richest man accused of snooping on some of America's most sensitive data. The DOGE has been tasked with reducing government spending by a paltry $2 trillion, which Musk himself admits might be unfeasible. 

However, the billionaire and his crew have lost no time to shed the fat, targeting everything from the National Space Council to USAID. Concerns have been raised regarding the DOGE's level of access, and some staff members have received death threats as a result of the debate.

"You can’t un-ring this bell,” the anonymous source told the local media outlet. Once these DOGE guys have access to these data systems, they can ostensibly do with it what they want." 

Four sources spoke to the local media outlet, but only Scott Cory would go on record. The former CIO for an HHS agency said: "The longer this goes on, the greater the risk of potential fatal compromise increases.” 

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Office of Personnel Management, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the U.S. Treasury have all apparently been accessed by the DOGE. "I don't think the public quite understands the level of danger," a federal agency administrator continued. 

With its newfound authority, the DOGE might prevent payments to government agencies and redirect funds to organisations it chooses. There are concerns that possible access to Federal Aviation could be "dire," even if Musk hasn't altered the current system yet. 

There have also been criticism that he has brought in a young team of technical wizards, but one payment-systems expert remarked that this is actually a good thing: "If you were going to organise a heist of the US Treasury, why in the world would you bring a handful of college students?" He went on to suggest that you'd need numerous people with at least ten years of experience with COBOL. 

Despite not being paid, working 120 hours a week, and sleeping in the offices, DOGE employees have been flexing their muscles to make some significant savings. Looking at the broad picture, one source concluded: "I'd want to believe that this is all so enormous and convoluted that they won't be successful in whatever they're attempting to do. But I wouldn't bet that outcome against their egos.”

Three Ways to Safeguard Your Smart Home From Cybercriminals

 

Your smart home is a technological marvel. However, when camera flaws allow our neighbours to spy on us, smart speakers are manipulated with lasers, robot vacuums are breached to shout obscenities, and entire security systems are compromised by a smart plug, it's fair if you're hesitant to link your home to the internet. 

However, there is no reason to completely forgo the benefits of smart home devices. The idea is to recognise the risks and make use of available security features. Whether you have a network of smart kitchen gadgets or a single voice assistant, these measures will ensure that no one messes with your belongings. 

Secure your wi-fi network 

The majority of routers come with a model-specific SSID and either a random password or something generic, such as "admin," making it easier for cybercriminals to gain access to your home Wi-Fi and snoop about your linked smart home devices. Keep in mind that these manufacturer-supplied credentials are available online for anybody to use, so the first step is to secure your Wi-Fi network with a strong password. 

The process differs slightly depending on the device, but the basics are the same; here's how to get started. Those employing a mesh system will be able to manage security settings via a handy smartphone app. If your router supports it, consider altering the SSID, which is simply the name of your Wi-Fi network (e.g., PCMag_Home). While older devices are limited to WPA2, newer routers support the more secure WPA3 protocol. 

Replace outdated routers

You presumably purchased a new phone or laptop during the last several years. But how about your router? Has it accumulated dust on a shelf for far too long? If your internet performance isn't already hurting, the security of your linked gadgets very likely is. 

An ageing router indicates ageing security protocols—and an easier access point for undesirable actors. If you need a new router, the latest home internet standard is Wi-Fi 6. Prices for Wi-Fi 6 routers have dropped dramatically in recent years, with more alternatives available. Meanwhile, Wi-Fi 7 is still in its early stages of release. Check out our reviews of the finest wireless routers, gaming routers, and mesh networks.

Manage your account passwords

After securing the Wi-Fi network, it's time to safeguard the individual devices and services that connect to it. Numerous smart gadgets are managed by a smartphone app, so you'll need to create an account for each one. Using the same password for everything is handy, but it also poses a security risk.

If one of those accounts is compromised and the password is revealed, hackers may gain access to all of the other accounts on which you used that password. Instead, create a one-of-a-kind password that no one else will be able to guess. You may use a random password generator to generate difficult-to-guess codes, and a password manager to remember them all for you.

A Looming Threat to Crypto Keys: The Risk of a Quantum Hack

 


The Quantum Computing Threat to Cryptocurrency Security

The immense computational power that quantum computing offers raises significant concerns, particularly around its potential to compromise private keys that secure digital interactions. Among the most pressing fears is its ability to break the private keys safeguarding cryptocurrency wallets.

While this threat is genuine, it is unlikely to materialize overnight. It is, however, crucial to examine the current state of quantum computing in terms of commercial capabilities and assess its potential to pose a real danger to cryptocurrency security.

Before delving into the risks, it’s essential to understand the basics of quantum computing. Unlike classical computers, which process information using bits (either 0 or 1), quantum computers rely on quantum bits, or qubits. Qubits leverage the principles of quantum mechanics to exist in multiple states simultaneously (0, 1, or both 0 and 1, thanks to the phenomenon of superposition).

Quantum Computing Risks: Shor’s Algorithm

One of the primary risks posed by quantum computing stems from Shor’s algorithm, which allows quantum computers to factor large integers exponentially faster than classical algorithms. The security of several cryptographic systems, including RSA, relies on the difficulty of factoring large composite numbers. For instance, RSA-2048, a widely used cryptographic key size, underpins the private keys used to sign and authorize cryptocurrency transactions.

Breaking RSA-2048 with today’s classical computers, even using massive clusters of processors, would take billions of years. To illustrate, a successful attempt to crack RSA-768 (a 768-bit number) in 2009 required years of effort and hundreds of clustered machines. The computational difficulty grows exponentially with key size, making RSA-2048 virtually unbreakable within any human timescale—at least for now.

Commercial quantum computing offerings, such as IBM Q System One, Google Sycamore, Rigetti Aspen-9, and AWS Braket, are available today for those with the resources to use them. However, the number of qubits these systems offer remains limited — typically only a few dozen. This is far from sufficient to break even moderately sized cryptographic keys within any realistic timeframe. Breaking RSA-2048 would require millions of years with current quantum systems.

Beyond insufficient qubit capacity, today’s quantum computers face challenges in qubit stability, error correction, and scalability. Additionally, their operation depends on extreme conditions. Qubits are highly sensitive to electromagnetic disturbances, necessitating cryogenic temperatures and advanced magnetic shielding for stability.

Future Projections and the Quantum Threat

Unlike classical computing, quantum computing lacks a clear equivalent of Moore’s Law to predict how quickly its power will grow. Google’s Hartmut Neven proposed a “Neven’s Law” suggesting double-exponential growth in quantum computing power, but this model has yet to consistently hold up in practice beyond research and development milestones.

Hypothetically, achieving double-exponential growth to reach the approximately 20 million physical qubits needed to crack RSA-2048 could take another four years. However, this projection assumes breakthroughs in addressing error correction, qubit stability, and scalability—all formidable challenges in their own right.

While quantum computing poses a theoretical threat to cryptocurrency and other cryptographic systems, significant technical hurdles must be overcome before it becomes a tangible risk. Current commercial offerings remain far from capable of cracking RSA-2048 or similar key sizes. However, as research progresses, it is crucial for industries reliant on cryptographic security to explore quantum-resistant algorithms to stay ahead of potential threats.

Japan Attributes Ongoing Cyberattacks to China-Linked MirrorFace Group

 


Japan's National Police Agency (NPA) and the National Centre of Incident Readiness and Strategy for Cybersecurity (NISC) have officially attributed a prolonged cyberattack campaign targeting Japanese organizations and individuals since 2019 to the China-linked threat actor MirrorFace, also known as Earth Kasha.

The cyberattacks were designed to steal sensitive information related to Japan's national security and emerging technologies. MirrorFace is reportedly a subgroup of the Chinese state-sponsored hacking collective APT10, notorious for deploying malware tools such as ANEL, LODEINFO, and NOOPDOOR.

Authorities have identified three distinct phases in MirrorFace's attack operations:
  • December 2019 – July 2023: Spear-phishing emails carrying malware like LODEINFO, LilimRAT, and NOOPDOOR targeted government agencies, think tanks, politicians, and media outlets.
  • February – October 2023: Malware such as Cobalt Strike Beacon, LODEINFO, and NOOPDOOR was deployed through vulnerabilities in network devices to infiltrate sectors like semiconductors, aerospace, and academic institutions.
  • June 2024 – Present: Phishing emails loaded with ANEL malware were sent to think tanks, political figures, and media organizations.

Sophisticated Cyberattack Techniques

MirrorFace utilized advanced methods to evade detection and maintain persistence, including:
  • Windows Sandbox Deployment: Malware was executed within the Windows Sandbox, a virtualized environment that limits malware persistence by erasing data upon system reset.
  • Evasion of Security Tools: This technique allowed malware to operate undetected by antivirus software.

Scale and Impact of the Cyberattacks

The NPA has connected MirrorFace to over 200 cyber incidents spanning five years. The affected sectors include:
  • Government Agencies
  • Defense Organizations
  • Space Research Centers
  • Private Enterprises in Advanced Technologies

Phishing emails often used compelling subjects like "Japan-US alliance" and "Taiwan Strait" to deceive recipients into downloading malicious attachments. Notable attacks linked to similar tactics include:
  • Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA): Targeted in a sophisticated cyberattack.
  • Port of Nagoya (2023): Disrupted by a ransomware incident.

In response to these threats, the NPA issued a public warning:

“This alert aims to raise awareness among targeted organizations, businesses, and individuals about the threats they face in cyberspace by publicly disclosing the methods used in the cyber-attacks by ‘MirrorFace.’ It also seeks to encourage the implementation of appropriate security measures to prevent the expansion of damage from cyber-attacks and to avert potential harm.”

The warning underscores the need for heightened cybersecurity practices across sectors to mitigate risks from increasingly sophisticated cyber threats.

Apple Faces Backlash Over Misinformation from Apple Intelligence Tool

 



Apple made headlines with the launch of its Apple Intelligence tool, which quickly gained global attention. However, the tech giant now faces mounting criticism after reports emerged that the AI feature has been generating false news notifications, raising concerns about misinformation.

The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) was the first to report the problem, directly complaining to Apple that the AI summaries were misrepresenting their journalism. Apple responded belatedly, clarifying that its staff are working to ensure users understand these summaries are AI-generated and not official news reports.

Alan Rusbridger, former editor of The Guardian, criticized Apple, suggesting the company should withdraw the product if it is not yet ready. He warned that Apple’s technology poses a significant risk of spreading misinformation globally, potentially causing unnecessary panic among readers.

Rusbridger further emphasized that public trust in journalism is already fragile. He expressed concern that major American tech companies like Apple should not use the media industry as a testing ground for experimental features.

Pressure from Journalist Organizations

The National Union of Journalists (NUJ), a leading global body representing journalists, joined the criticism, urging Apple to take swift action to curb the spread of misinformation. The NUJ's statement echoes previous concerns raised by Reporters Without Borders (RSF).

Laura Davison, NUJ’s general secretary, stressed the urgency of the matter, stating,

"At a time when access to accurate reporting has never been more important, the public must not be placed in a position of second-guessing the accuracy of news they receive."

Apple is now under increasing pressure from media organizations and watchdog groups to resolve the issue. If the company fails to address these concerns promptly, it may be forced to remove the Apple Intelligence feature altogether.

With legal and regulatory scrutiny intensifying, Apple’s next steps will be closely watched. Prolonging the issue could invite further criticism and potential legal consequences.

This situation highlights the growing responsibility of tech companies to prevent the spread of misinformation, especially when deploying advanced AI tools. Apple must act decisively to regain public trust and ensure its technologies do not compromise the integrity of reliable journalism.

Threat Actors Are Sending Fraudulent Legal Notices to Target Indians

 

The Indian authorities have issued an urgent warning to residents over the widespread circulation of counterfeit emails impersonating Rajesh Kumar, CEO of the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C). 

These fraudulent emails, with misleading subject lines like "Urgent Notification!" and "Court Notification," falsely accuse recipients of cybercrime and pressure them to respond. The PIB Fact Check team has identified these emails as fraudulent, emphasising that they were sent with malicious purpose to trick recipients and exploit their fears. 

Fake email threat

The bogus emails exploit the logos of prominent Indian institutions, such as the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C), Intelligence Bureau (IB), and Delhi Police, as proof of legitimacy. They also represent themselves by using the names and contact information of senior officials to deceive recipients. These fake emails have been sent to government offices, people, and organisations, posing as official correspondence. 

In a tweet from its official handle, @PIBFactCheck, the bureau clarified that these emails are absolutely fraudulent and deceitful. "It is vital to note that neither the undersigned nor this unit originated such emails. Furthermore, no permission has been obtained for the creation or distribution of such content," the release noted. 

Cybercrime impact in India 

Concern over the rise in cybercrime in India is growing. Avinash Mohanty, the commissioner of police for Cyberabad, claims that cybercrime makes up more than 30% of the commissionerate's cognisable offences and that it may soon reach 50%. It is alarming to learn that every minute, Indian residents lose between 1.3 and 1.5 lakh rupees to hackers. This startling statistic emphasises the importance of raising awareness and vigilance against online fraud and scams. 

The recovery rate for cybercrime damages in the nation remains dismally low, averaging less than 20%. This increases the financial and emotional toll on sufferers. The increase in cybercrime impacts not only individuals and businesses, but also government institutions, which have been targeted in cases of espionage and data breaches.

In recent years, India has had a number of high-profile data breaches, the most significant of which involved Aadhaar, the country's unique citizen identification system. This breach affected over a billion Indians' personal information, including bank account numbers, addresses, and fingerprints. In 2024, the cost of data breaches in India would exceed two million US dollars, illustrating the increasing sophistication of cyberattacks and their devastating consequences.

Understanding VoIP DDoS Attacks: Prevention and Mitigation Strategies

 


A distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack targets a VoIP server by overwhelming it with phony user requests. This excessive traffic can exceed the network’s capacity, causing service disruptions and making genuine user requests unprocessable. Online criminals exploit these attacks to disrupt Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) network services, the backbone of modern business phone systems and customer service software. VoIP services are particularly susceptible to DDoS attacks, as even a failed attempt can significantly degrade voice call quality and reliability. 
  
Modus Operandi of VoIP DDoS Attacks 
 
DDoS attacks aim to overwhelm a network with fake traffic, resulting in service denial for legitimate users. A typical VoIP server managing hundreds of calls per hour might struggle to respond to thousands of requests per second during an attack. Key attack methods include:
  • Botnets: Hackers deploy large networks of compromised devices, such as PCs, routers, mobile phones, and IoT devices, to generate attack traffic.
  • SIP Flood Attack: The attacker sends numerous Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) call requests, crashing the victim's VoIP server.
  • SIP Reflection Attack: Hackers spoof the victim's IP address and send queries to random servers, which flood the victim’s server with responses, overloading it.
Mitigation Tips to Defend Against VoIP DDoS Attacks 
 
Adopting robust defense mechanisms can help protect VoIP systems from DDoS attacks. Key strategies include: 
  
1. Use a Reverse Proxy A reverse proxy acts as an intermediary between clients and servers, handling and filtering requests to shield the server. Benefits include:
  • Regulating inbound traffic to ensure only legitimate requests pass through.
  • Disguising the origin server's IP address to prevent direct targeting by hackers.
  • Minimizing latency by offloading tasks such as encrypting and decrypting TLS/SSL communications.
2. Real-Time Network Monitoring Real-time monitoring tools establish a baseline of regular activity to detect anomalies. These tools:
  • Identify unusual network behavior, enabling rapid responses to DDoS-induced traffic spikes.
  • Protect endpoint protocols and IP blocks from malicious requests.
  • Help prevent VoIP fraud by detecting and mitigating suspicious activities.
3. Implement Rate Limiting Rate limiting reduces the impact of malicious bot traffic by controlling the volume of requests. It works by:
  • Delaying or blocking excessive requests from a single IP or multiple sources.
  • Setting thresholds to limit the frequency of actions within a specific time frame.
  • Ensuring only legitimate traffic reaches critical resources.
Rate limiting effectively curtails attackers' ability to sustain a successful DDoS attack. 

VoIP DDoS attacks pose significant risks to modern communication systems, but proactive measures can mitigate these threats. By using reverse proxies, adopting real-time monitoring tools, and implementing rate-limiting techniques, organizations can safeguard their VoIP infrastructure against malicious traffic and ensure uninterrupted services.

Here's Why You Need A New App After Google RCS Issue

 

Google Messages has suddenly gone haywire. After years of campaigning, the "seamless messaging" dream was finally realised, but it vanished as quickly as it arrived. Currently, the question is whether it has any prospect of ever returning. 

Like a slow-motion train crash, Google quickly appreciated Apple for its long-awaited adoption of RCS, but as soon as it went live, it was criticised for its awkward security flaw. Despite iMessage's constant praise of its end-to-end encryption, those green bubbles are still without it. 

Quick to react, Google and the GSMA said that end-to-end encryption for RCS is currently being developed. China comes along to ruin the fun, even though that might have won the day. Apple, Google, and other companies insist on end-to-end encryption since it appears that state-sponsored hackers have infiltrated US telco networks. 

Cross-platform RCS has suffered severely as a result of the FBI and CISA are now both cautioning the public to utilise encrypted platforms properly. There is no security when texting from an Android phone to an iPhone, as Samsung has warned customers. 

Google and the GSMA were quick to respond, promising that end-to-end encryption for RCS is in the works. But, although that might have won the day, China arrives to spoil the fun. It appears that state-sponsored hackers have broken into US telco networks, highlighting why Apple, Google, and others advocate for end-to-end encryption in the first place. With the FBI and CISA now warning citizens to use appropriately encrypted systems, cross-platform RCS has taken a significant knock. Even Samsung has advised consumers that texting from Android to iPhone is not secure. 

Apple has never denied that iMessage is only secure within its own walled garden. Google, not Apple, pushed for cross-platform RCS. When it finally arrived with iOS 18, Google sent out public messages about non-blurry images and other new capabilities, whereas Apple said little, if anything at all. 

So now it's up to Google Messages to pick up the pieces of this security catastrophe and figure out what to do next. How quickly can RCS be beefed up to meet the "responsible encryption" standard specified by the US government officials? Given the official warnings, how do Google and Apple encourage consumers to send basic RCS/SMS texts? How quickly will network confidence get better? 

However, with timing being everything, the ultimate impediment to that RCS train could be Apple's upcoming iPhone update—iOS 18.2. To everyone's surprise, the iMaker has chosen to provide all of its users—not just those in controlled Europe—the ability to choose their default apps. For the first time, choose an over-the-top service like WhatsApp or Signal as your primary call and message provider. 

The 2024 RCS dream has suffered a setback, though whether it has been buried beneath the waters remains to be seen. What is evident is that this benefits Meta, which owns the world's largest end-to-end encrypted messaging systems, WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger, even if they are not "responsibly" encrypted, as defined by the FBI, which requires authorised access to content when necessary. 

Google Messages customers who use that platform to text friends, family, and colleagues will now require a new app. If you don't already have WhatsApp, Messenger, or Signal, you should download them right now. WhatsApp is the clear winner, striking the ideal combination between security, functionality, and scalability. Many of the people you communicate with will already have the app installed.

In keeping with the security theme, you must take two steps to guarantee the integrity of end-to-end encryption. Start by correctly configuring WhatsApp (or a substitute). This includes passkeys when they are available and two-factor authentication. Second, make sure you avoid taking any chances when installing apps, downloading files, or clicking links. It's as if you haven't secured your stuff at all if an attacker uses malware to take over your phone or lures you into installing malicious software, regardless of the messenger you use. 

The irony for Google has continued with the announcement that Samsung is discontinuing RCS for millions of Galaxy users who are still using Samsung Messages and advising they migrate to Google Messages. The Galaxy maker told Verizon customers that "Samsung Messages will no longer support RCS after 1.6.2025." Switch to Google Messages to keep the more robust messaging you're accustomed to.”

Turn Your Phone Off Daily for Five Minutes to Prevent Hacking

 


There are numerous ways in which critical data on your phone can be compromised. These range from subscription-based apps that covertly transmit private user data to social media platforms like Facebook, to fraudulent accounts that trick your friends into investing in fake cryptocurrency schemes. This issue goes beyond being a mere nuisance; it represents a significant threat to individual privacy, democratic processes, and global human rights.

Experts and advocates have called for stricter regulations and safeguards to address the growing risks posed by spyware and data exploitation. However, the implementation of such measures often lags behind the rapid pace of technological advancements. This delay leaves a critical gap in protections, exacerbating the risks for individuals and organizations alike.

Ronan Farrow, a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist, offers a surprisingly simple yet effective tip for reducing the chances of phone hacking: turn your phone off more frequently. During an appearance on The Daily Show to discuss his new documentary, Surveilled, Farrow highlighted the pressing need for more robust government regulations to curb spyware technology. He warned that unchecked use of such technology could push societies toward an "Orwellian surveillance state," affecting everyone who uses digital devices, not just political activists or dissidents.

Farrow explained that rebooting your phone daily can disrupt many forms of modern spyware, as these tools often lose their hold during a restart. This simple act not only safeguards privacy but also prevents apps from tracking user activity or gathering sensitive data. Even for individuals who are not high-profile targets, such as journalists or political figures, this practice adds a layer of protection against cyber threats. It also makes it more challenging for hackers to infiltrate devices and steal information.

Beyond cybersecurity, rebooting your phone regularly has additional benefits. It can help optimize device performance by clearing temporary files and resolving minor glitches. This maintenance step ensures smoother operation and prolongs the lifespan of your device. Essentially, the tried-and-true advice to "turn it off and on again" remains a relevant and practical solution for both privacy protection and device health.

Spyware and other forms of cyber threats pose a growing challenge in today’s interconnected world. From Pegasus-like software that targets high-profile individuals to less sophisticated malware that exploits everyday users, the spectrum of risks is wide and pervasive. Governments and technology companies are increasingly being pressured to develop and enforce regulations that prioritize user security. However, until such measures are in place, individuals can take proactive steps like regular phone reboots, minimizing app permissions, and avoiding suspicious downloads to reduce their vulnerability.

Ultimately, as technology continues to evolve, so too must our awareness and protective measures. While systemic changes are necessary to address the larger issues, small habits like rebooting your phone can offer immediate, tangible benefits. In the face of sophisticated cyber threats, a simple daily restart serves as a reminder that sometimes the most basic solutions are the most effective.

Internal Threats Loom Large as Businesses Deal With External Threats

 

Most people have likely been forced by their employer to undergo hour-long courses on how to prevent cyberattacks such as phishing, malware, and ransomware. Companies compel their staff to do this since cybercrime can be quite costly. According to FBI and IMF estimates, the cost is predicted to rise from $8.4 trillion in 2022 to $23 trillion by 2027. There are preventative methods available, such as multifactor authentication. 

The fact is, all of these threats are external. As companies develop the ability to handle these concerns, leadership's attention will move to an even more important concern: risks emanating from within the organisation. Being on "the inside" generally entails having access to highly sensitive and confidential information required to perform their duties. 

This can include financial performance statistics, product launch timelines, and source code. While this seems reasonable at first look, allowing access to this information also poses a significant risk to organizations—from top-secret government agencies to Fortune 500 companies and small businesses—if employees leak it.

Unfortunately, insider disclosures are becoming increasingly common. Since 2019, the number of insider occurrences reported by organisations has increased from 66% to an astounding 76%. Furthermore, these insider leaks are costly. In 2023, organisations spent an average of $16.2 million on resolving insider threats, with North American companies incurring the greatest overall cost of $19.09 million. 

There are several recent examples. Someone has leaked Israeli documents regarding an attack on Iran. An Apple employee leaked information about the iPhone 16. Examples abound throughout history. For example, in 1971, the Pentagon Papers altered public perception of the Vietnam War. However, the widespread use of internet media has made these risks simpler to propagate and more difficult to detect. 

Prevention tips 

Tech help: Monitoring for suspicious behaviour with software and AI is one technique to prevent leaks. Behaviour modelling technology, particularly AI-powered ones, can be quite effective at generating statistical conclusions using predictive analytics to, well, forecast outcomes and raise red flags. 

These solutions can provide an alarm, for example, if someone in HR, who would ordinarily not handle product design files, suddenly downloads a large number of product design files. Or if an employee has saved a large amount of information to a USB drive. Companies can use this information to conduct investigations, adjust access levels, or notify them that they need to pay more attention. 

Shut down broad access: Restricting employee access to specific data and files or eliminating certain files completely are two other strategies to stop internal leaks. This can mitigate the chance of leakage in the short term, but at what cost? Information exchange can inspire creativity and foster a culture of trust and innovation. 

Individualize data and files: Steganography, or the act of concealing information in plain sight, dates back to Ancient Greece and is a promising field for preventing leaks. It employs forensic watermarks to change a piece of content (an email, file, photo, or presentation) in imperceptible ways that identify the content so that sharing can be traced back to a single person. 

In recent times, the film industry was the first to employ steganography to combat piracy and theft of vital content. Movies and shows streamed on Hulu or Netflix are often protected with digital rights management (DRM), which includes audio and video watermarking to ensure that each copy is unique. Consider applying this technology to a company's daily operations, where terabytes of digital communications including potentially sensitive information—emails, presentations, photos, customer data—could be personalised for each individual. 

One thing is certain, regardless of the approach a business takes: it needs to have a strategy in place for dealing with the escalating issue of internal leaks. The danger is genuine, and the expenses are excessive. Since most employees are good, it only takes one bad actor to leak information and bring significant damage to their organisation.